World Freedom

August 7th, 2026

Blogger Comment: All you need to know about this piece of shit and Globalist WEF controlled stooge lead author of this depopulation agenda article Mark Keegan, is all here and only wants to kill humanity on a massive scale, but where he has his figures wrong where the WEF Globalists have stated many times that they want to reduce Humanity to 400 million and to 1/10th of what Keegan and his genocide scientists gang want to do to humanity’s-numbers   https://everydayconcerned.net/2020/12/10/mark-keenan-former-un-environmental-officer-false-and-deceptive-un-and-wef-narratives-on-corona-reset-agenda-2030-all-part-of-the-one-world-government-agenda-of-control/

.

A group of international scientists is pushing a chilling plan to slash a staggering 4 billion people from the global population of humans to achieve what they describe as a “sustainable” future for those selected to remain on Earth.

The scientists made the call in a newly published study, reigniting alarm over the global depopulation agenda after the researchers argued that the Earth’s population should be cut roughly in half.

The study, authored by roughly a dozen researchers led by Columbia University’s Mark Keegan, contends that the world’s population must be culled to approximately four billion people by the year 2200.

“We show that slowing and gradually reversing population growth to ∼4 billion or less by 2200, while moderating per capita impacts, is the path toward sustainability,” the authors wrote.

The researchers also called for reducing “per capita impacts,” a reference to lowering individual consumption of energy, resources, and other goods.

Researchers Blame Humanity for Environmental Problems

The study argues that population growth is driving a wide range of environmental issues, including declining wildlife populations, rising carbon dioxide emissions, greater energy consumption, increased freshwater use, expanded mineral extraction, plastic production, pesticide use, and a growing ecological footprint.

“Global environmental problems are caused by people, nothing else,” the authors asserted.

“The more of us there are, the greater our overall economic demands and the greater the associated environmental problems.”

They concluded that continued population growth is fundamentally “unsustainable.”

Using United Nations population projections, the researchers argued that humanity is on course to peak at between 9 billion and more than 11 billion people by the end of the century; levels they claim pose an unacceptable threat to long-term sustainability.

Calls for More Population-Control Policies

To accelerate population decline, the study recommends expanding access to what it describes as “reproductive health services,” a term that commonly includes abortion alongside contraception.

The authors also call for improving girls’ educational opportunities, particularly in developing nations, as part of their strategy for reducing birth rates.

Beyond reducing population growth, they advocate additional government intervention aimed at lowering consumption through stricter land-use policies, pollution controls, energy-efficiency targets, and expanded limits on the extraction of natural resources ranging from fisheries to forests.

The researchers argue that even stronger measures may ultimately be required at the local, national, and international levels.

Critics Say Population Collapse Is the Real Threat

While the study warns of overpopulation, many demographers argue that the opposite problem is rapidly emerging.

Global fertility has already fallen dramatically.

The study itself acknowledges that the worldwide fertility rate stood at just 2.2 children per woman in 2024, barely above the replacement level needed to maintain stable populations.

Other researchers have warned that much of the developed world is already experiencing sustained below-replacement fertility, setting the stage for long-term population decline.

A major study published in The Lancet projected that the world could begin experiencing a steep population decline within decades.

Economist Dean Spears of the University of Texas Population Research Center has similarly warned that once fertility remains below replacement for an extended period, the world’s population could eventually shrink to “very small” numbers.

According to Spears and his co-authors, prolonged population decline could trigger widespread economic and social consequences, including shrinking workforces, reduced innovation, deteriorating infrastructure, labor shortages, declining mental health, and mounting pressure on healthcare systems caring for aging populations.

Even the World Economic Forum has acknowledged that large-scale population collapse could have “severe” consequences.

Debate Over Earth’s Carrying Capacity

The assumption that Earth cannot support its current population remains highly contested.

Research on the planet’s carrying capacity varies dramatically.

Some studies estimate Earth can sustainably support roughly 8 billion people, close to today’s global population.

Others conclude the planet could sustain 16 billion people or more, while several estimates place the number as high as 64 billion.

One study even projected a theoretical carrying capacity exceeding 1 trillion people under certain technological assumptions.

Past Predictions Failed to Materialize

Psychologist Jordan Peterson has frequently pointed to earlier warnings of catastrophic overpopulation that never came to pass.

Discussing predictions made decades ago by the globalist pro-depopulation Club of Rome, Peterson noted that many forecasts warned of mass starvation, riots, and societal collapse by the turn of the century because there were supposedly “too many people on the planet.”

“That just didn’t happen at all,” Peterson said.

“It wasn’t just wrong, it was anti-true.

“It was absolutely wrong.”

Instead, Peterson argued, living standards improved dramatically around the world, with hundreds of millions of people escaping extreme poverty.

Author Eric Metaxas has similarly criticized modern overpopulation fears as descendants of Thomas Malthus’ population theory, which predicted that population growth would inevitably outstrip food production.

Environmental scientist Erle C. Ellis has also challenged the premise, arguing that advances in technology have repeatedly expanded humanity’s ability to support larger populations.

According to Ellis, history demonstrates that societies have consistently sustained populations well beyond what traditional Malthusian models predicted, leading him to conclude that there is “no such thing as a human carrying capacity” in any fixed sense.

The study nevertheless adds to a growing body of proposals advocating lower birth rates, reduced consumption, and expanded government intervention as solutions to global environmental challenges, recommendations that amount to another push for population control despite mounting evidence that many nations are instead confronting demographic decline.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/scientists-push-plan-slash-global-population-4-billion/

And,

READ MORE – Biologist: Bill Gates ‘Destroyed’ Entire Ecosystem with Mosquito Agenda

Blogger Comment: All you need to know about this piece of shit and Globalist WEF controlled stooge lead author of this depopulation agenda article Mark Keegan, is all here and only wants to kill humanity on a massive scale, but where he has his figures wrong where the WEF Globalists have stated many times that they want to reduce Humanity to 400 million and to 1/10th of what Keegan and his genocide scientists gang want to do to humanity’s-numbers  https://everydayconcerned.net/2020/12/10/mark-keenan-former-un-environmental-officer-false-and-deceptive-un-and-wef-narratives-on-corona-reset-agenda-2030-all-part-of-the-one-world-government-agenda-of-control/

.

A group of international scientists is pushing a chilling plan to slash a staggering 4 billion people from the global population of humans to achieve what they describe as a “sustainable” future for those selected to remain on Earth.

The scientists made the call in a newly published study, reigniting alarm over the global depopulation agenda after the researchers argued that the Earth’s population should be cut roughly in half.

The study, authored by roughly a dozen researchers led by Columbia University’s Mark Keegan, contends that the world’s population must be culled to approximately four billion people by the year 2200.

“We show that slowing and gradually reversing population growth to ∼4 billion or less by 2200, while moderating per capita impacts, is the path toward sustainability,” the authors wrote.

The researchers also called for reducing “per capita impacts,” a reference to lowering individual consumption of energy, resources, and other goods.

Researchers Blame Humanity for Environmental Problems

The study argues that population growth is driving a wide range of environmental issues, including declining wildlife populations, rising carbon dioxide emissions, greater energy consumption, increased freshwater use, expanded mineral extraction, plastic production, pesticide use, and a growing ecological footprint.

“Global environmental problems are caused by people, nothing else,” the authors asserted.

“The more of us there are, the greater our overall economic demands and the greater the associated environmental problems.”

They concluded that continued population growth is fundamentally “unsustainable.”

Using United Nations population projections, the researchers argued that humanity is on course to peak at between 9 billion and more than 11 billion people by the end of the century; levels they claim pose an unacceptable threat to long-term sustainability.

Calls for More Population-Control Policies

To accelerate population decline, the study recommends expanding access to what it describes as “reproductive health services,” a term that commonly includes abortion alongside contraception.

The authors also call for improving girls’ educational opportunities, particularly in developing nations, as part of their strategy for reducing birth rates.

Beyond reducing population growth, they advocate additional government intervention aimed at lowering consumption through stricter land-use policies, pollution controls, energy-efficiency targets, and expanded limits on the extraction of natural resources ranging from fisheries to forests.

The researchers argue that even stronger measures may ultimately be required at the local, national, and international levels.

Critics Say Population Collapse Is the Real Threat

While the study warns of overpopulation, many demographers argue that the opposite problem is rapidly emerging.

Global fertility has already fallen dramatically.

The study itself acknowledges that the worldwide fertility rate stood at just 2.2 children per woman in 2024, barely above the replacement level needed to maintain stable populations.

Other researchers have warned that much of the developed world is already experiencing sustained below-replacement fertility, setting the stage for long-term population decline.

A major study published in The Lancet projected that the world could begin experiencing a steep population decline within decades.

Economist Dean Spears of the University of Texas Population Research Center has similarly warned that once fertility remains below replacement for an extended period, the world’s population could eventually shrink to “very small” numbers.

According to Spears and his co-authors, prolonged population decline could trigger widespread economic and social consequences, including shrinking workforces, reduced innovation, deteriorating infrastructure, labor shortages, declining mental health, and mounting pressure on healthcare systems caring for aging populations.

Even the World Economic Forum has acknowledged that large-scale population collapse could have “severe” consequences.

Debate Over Earth’s Carrying Capacity

The assumption that Earth cannot support its current population remains highly contested.

Research on the planet’s carrying capacity varies dramatically.

Some studies estimate Earth can sustainably support roughly 8 billion people, close to today’s global population.

Others conclude the planet could sustain 16 billion people or more, while several estimates place the number as high as 64 billion.

One study even projected a theoretical carrying capacity exceeding 1 trillion people under certain technological assumptions.

Past Predictions Failed to Materialize

Psychologist Jordan Peterson has frequently pointed to earlier warnings of catastrophic overpopulation that never came to pass.

Discussing predictions made decades ago by the globalist pro-depopulation Club of Rome, Peterson noted that many forecasts warned of mass starvation, riots, and societal collapse by the turn of the century because there were supposedly “too many people on the planet.”

“That just didn’t happen at all,” Peterson said.

“It wasn’t just wrong, it was anti-true.

“It was absolutely wrong.”

Instead, Peterson argued, living standards improved dramatically around the world, with hundreds of millions of people escaping extreme poverty.

Author Eric Metaxas has similarly criticized modern overpopulation fears as descendants of Thomas Malthus’ population theory, which predicted that population growth would inevitably outstrip food production.

Environmental scientist Erle C. Ellis has also challenged the premise, arguing that advances in technology have repeatedly expanded humanity’s ability to support larger populations.

According to Ellis, history demonstrates that societies have consistently sustained populations well beyond what traditional Malthusian models predicted, leading him to conclude that there is “no such thing as a human carrying capacity” in any fixed sense.

The study nevertheless adds to a growing body of proposals advocating lower birth rates, reduced consumption, and expanded government intervention as solutions to global environmental challenges, recommendations that amount to another push for population control despite mounting evidence that many nations are instead confronting demographic decline.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/scientists-push-plan-slash-global-population-4-billion/

And,

READ MORE – Biologist: Bill Gates ‘Destroyed’ Entire Ecosystem with Mosquito Agenda

August 7th, 2026

Blogger Comment: A part of Hell on Earth that is emerging, but no-one is hardly looking at what is on the horizon for humanity…and all part of the Globalist’s killing field…The explosive testimony from Donovan James has gone viral after he accused Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) regime of abandoning his wife, Kristin Logan, to die while refusing to provide life-saving care…for according to James, leaving Canada wasn’t a choice…it was the only way to save her life...welcome t the world of the Globalists and their depopulation agenda where no-one will have a choice whether you live or die according to the Bible of the Globalist elites…for its coming…

.

A Canadian husband is sounding the alarm after the country’s government-run healthcare system tried to euthanize his wife instead of saving her life, forcing the couple to flee to the United States, where she received treatment that has since put her cancer into remission multiple times.

The explosive testimony from Donovan James has gone viral after he accused Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) regime of abandoning his wife, Kristin Logan, to die while refusing to provide life-saving care.

According to James, leaving Canada wasn’t a choice.

It was the only way to save her life.

“They Tried to Kill My Wife”

“It’s been 2 1/2 years since my wife first fled Canada to save her life in the United States from stage four ovarian cancer after the Canadian healthcare system left her to die,” James said.

He said Canadian doctors told his wife there was nothing more they could do and dismissed HIPEC surgery as a treatment that would never save her.

Instead, he says, the system left euthanasia as the path forward.

“If we stayed in Canada, her only option would have been to kill herself on MAID because they had no treatment for her; they lied to her and said that the HIPEC surgery wouldn’t ever save her life, but it did,” James said.

James said the failures did not stop there.

He said the healthcare system lost his wife’s chemotherapy requisition before treatment even began, leaving her without cancer treatment while her condition rapidly deteriorated.

Every trip to the emergency room, he said, ended the same way.

“Every time” she went “begging for help in the ER” because her “lungs were filling in with fluid, and she was drowning in them, they kicked her out and sent her home with opioids because they didn’t have anybody there to drain her lungs,” James said.

“So now she’s getting closer to death and in a wheelchair. In a last-minute decision, she decides to try her luck in the United States.”

America Saved Her Life

Logan, who is both a Canadian and American citizen and also served in the U.S. Air Force, crossed the border to Seattle, where doctors immediately began chemotherapy and performed HIPEC surgery.

James says the treatment Canadian doctors dismissed ended up saving her life.

She later returned to Canada to spend time with family because James was unable to remain with her in the United States.

The nightmare quickly resumed.

James said she once again found herself inside a Canadian hospital “rotting and dying, and nearly about to go septic.”

After watching the same cycle repeat itself, the couple decided they had reached their breaking point.

“We decided enough is enough and we got me a green card,” James said.

“There’s No Death Cult Here”

The couple has since relocated to Texas, where James says the contrast with Canada could not be more dramatic.

“Nobody talks about death,” he said.

“In fact, last week, my wife is doing so well on chemo … she’s going into a third remission, she’s back squatting 175 pounds for five in the gym last week.”

“Does that sound like somebody who’s ready to die, Canada?

“Does that sound like somebody who needs to kill themselves with MAID?”

“I’m so grateful to be here in the United States, I’m so grateful especially to be here in Texas. I love Texas.”

“There’s state-of-the-art health care.

“There’s no waiting, there’s no bullsh*t.

“There’s no death cult here, just good care.”

Although Logan later revealed that her cancer has returned and she is now undergoing a 13th round of chemotherapy, James says she is still alive today because she escaped Canada’s euthanasia-first healthcare system before it was too late.

WATCH: To view the video below click on the following link – https://rumble.com/shorts/v7d7cla

Canada’s MAiD Regime Under Intensifying Fire

Canada legalized euthanasia in 2016, and the country’s MAiD program has expanded at a rapid pace ever since.

Hospitals have repeatedly come under fire for offering assisted suicide to vulnerable patients suffering from chronic illnesses, disabilities, or those in need of long-term care.

Slay News has previously highlighted the case of Roger Foley, a disabled Canadian with a degenerative brain disease whose advocate says the hospital caring for him has repeatedly promoted euthanasia while failing to provide the care he needs to survive.

Unless lawmakers intervene, Canada’s euthanasia law is set to expand again in 2027 to include people whose sole underlying condition is mental illness under Bill C-7.

Marking the tenth anniversary of legalized euthanasia, Canada’s Catholic bishops issued a warning against growing acceptance of what they described as a culture of death, urging Canadians to reject complacency toward a practice they said can “never” be morally acceptable.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/man-saves-wife-euthanized-canadian-government-flees-texas-cancer-treatment/

And,

READ MORE – Canada Edges Closer to Euthanizing Children

Blogger Comment: A part of Hell on Earth that is emerging, but no-one is hardly looking at what is on the horizon for humanity…and all part of the Globalist’s killing field…The explosive testimony from Donovan James has gone viral after he accused Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) regime of abandoning his wife, Kristin Logan, to die while refusing to provide life-saving care…for according to James, leaving Canada wasn’t a choice…it was the only way to save her life...welcome t the world of the Globalists and their depopulation agenda where no-one will have a choice whether you live or die according to the Bible of the Globalist elites…for its coming and is here already, but people are not aware as usual…

.

A Canadian husband is sounding the alarm after the country’s government-run healthcare system tried to euthanize his wife instead of saving her life, forcing the couple to flee to the United States, where she received treatment that has since put her cancer into remission multiple times.

The explosive testimony from Donovan James has gone viral after he accused Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) regime of abandoning his wife, Kristin Logan, to die while refusing to provide life-saving care.

According to James, leaving Canada wasn’t a choice.

It was the only way to save her life.

“They Tried to Kill My Wife”

“It’s been 2 1/2 years since my wife first fled Canada to save her life in the United States from stage four ovarian cancer after the Canadian healthcare system left her to die,” James said.

He said Canadian doctors told his wife there was nothing more they could do and dismissed HIPEC surgery as a treatment that would never save her.

Instead, he says, the system left euthanasia as the path forward.

“If we stayed in Canada, her only option would have been to kill herself on MAID because they had no treatment for her; they lied to her and said that the HIPEC surgery wouldn’t ever save her life, but it did,” James said.

James said the failures did not stop there.

He said the healthcare system lost his wife’s chemotherapy requisition before treatment even began, leaving her without cancer treatment while her condition rapidly deteriorated.

Every trip to the emergency room, he said, ended the same way.

“Every time” she went “begging for help in the ER” because her “lungs were filling in with fluid, and she was drowning in them, they kicked her out and sent her home with opioids because they didn’t have anybody there to drain her lungs,” James said.

“So now she’s getting closer to death and in a wheelchair. In a last-minute decision, she decides to try her luck in the United States.”

America Saved Her Life

Logan, who is both a Canadian and American citizen and also served in the U.S. Air Force, crossed the border to Seattle, where doctors immediately began chemotherapy and performed HIPEC surgery.

James says the treatment Canadian doctors dismissed ended up saving her life.

She later returned to Canada to spend time with family because James was unable to remain with her in the United States.

The nightmare quickly resumed.

James said she once again found herself inside a Canadian hospital “rotting and dying, and nearly about to go septic.”

After watching the same cycle repeat itself, the couple decided they had reached their breaking point.

“We decided enough is enough and we got me a green card,” James said.

“There’s No Death Cult Here”

The couple has since relocated to Texas, where James says the contrast with Canada could not be more dramatic.

“Nobody talks about death,” he said.

“In fact, last week, my wife is doing so well on chemo … she’s going into a third remission, she’s back squatting 175 pounds for five in the gym last week.”

“Does that sound like somebody who’s ready to die, Canada?

“Does that sound like somebody who needs to kill themselves with MAID?”

“I’m so grateful to be here in the United States, I’m so grateful especially to be here in Texas. I love Texas.”

“There’s state-of-the-art health care.

“There’s no waiting, there’s no bullsh*t.

“There’s no death cult here, just good care.”

Although Logan later revealed that her cancer has returned and she is now undergoing a 13th round of chemotherapy, James says she is still alive today because she escaped Canada’s euthanasia-first healthcare system before it was too late.

WATCH: To view the video below click on the following link – https://rumble.com/shorts/v7d7cla

Canada’s MAiD Regime Under Intensifying Fire

Canada legalized euthanasia in 2016, and the country’s MAiD program has expanded at a rapid pace ever since.

Hospitals have repeatedly come under fire for offering assisted suicide to vulnerable patients suffering from chronic illnesses, disabilities, or those in need of long-term care.

Slay News has previously highlighted the case of Roger Foley, a disabled Canadian with a degenerative brain disease whose advocate says the hospital caring for him has repeatedly promoted euthanasia while failing to provide the care he needs to survive.

Unless lawmakers intervene, Canada’s euthanasia law is set to expand again in 2027 to include people whose sole underlying condition is mental illness under Bill C-7.

Marking the tenth anniversary of legalized euthanasia, Canada’s Catholic bishops issued a warning against growing acceptance of what they described as a culture of death, urging Canadians to reject complacency toward a practice they said can “never” be morally acceptable.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/man-saves-wife-euthanized-canadian-government-flees-texas-cancer-treatment/

And,

READ MORE – Canada Edges Closer to Euthanizing Children

Blogger Comment: This monster on humanity has caused more death than any other person in history by a magnitude of all the other genocide on humanity through time and where he only started 51 years ago…as he is devastating the world and presents a collapsing indictment of global philanthropy imposed without regard for local realities and where the Gates Foundation entered the philantropic brain-dead religion promising to fight disease, but instead helped destroy the food source that millions depended upon to survive…the ultimate killer without a conscience for human life…

.

Renowned wildlife biologist Forrest Galante erupted during an appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast, accusing Bill Gates and his foundation of helping destroy one of Africa’s most important freshwater fisheries through a disastrous mosquito-net program.

Galante said the foundation distributed millions of tightly woven nets across communities near the Cahora Bassa Delta to combat malaria.

However, starving residents used the nets to catch fish instead.

Because mosquito nets contain extremely small holes, Galante said they indiscriminately captured juvenile fish before they could mature and reproduce, devastating a fishery relied upon by millions of people.

‘I’m Gonna Go on a F*cking Tirade’

Galante raised the issue while speaking with Rogan about wildlife and conservation in Africa.

“Do you know what they did fucking in the Cahora Bassa Delta with their mosquito nets?” Galante asked.

“No. What’d they do?” Rogan responded.

“Dude, I’m gonna go on a f*cking tirade here,” Galante warned.

“Please do,” Rogan replied.

Galante said the Gates Foundation entered African villages with a plan to reduce malaria by distributing mosquito nets.

“Okay, so the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation decided that there was too much malaria in Africa, right?” Galante said.

“Which you and I could probably agree with.

“Malaria is bad. So what did they do?

“They gave all of these people living in tribal villages,” Galante explained.

“I totally pirated your thing. I’m sorry, but I’m gonna go on a fu**ing rant here.

“They gave all these people living in the Cahora Bassa Delta, which is the breadbasket of the Zambezi Valley, meaning, like, where more fish are born.

“It’s a nursery for fish. Right.

“Not just there, but this is a good micro example.”

Nets Used to Catch Baby Fish

Galante said the people receiving the nets were struggling to obtain food and quickly realized the material could be used for fishing.

“They gave millions of mosquito nets out to all these people to ‘avoid malaria,’” Galante said.

“Guess what the people who are starving to death did with their mosquito nets?

“They fished with them. They fished with them.

“A mosquito net has a hole that is so small that a mosquito can’t get through.

“So guess what?” Galante asked.

“These mosquito nets now indiscriminately catch tiny baby fish in areas like Cahora Bassa, where the fish go to breed and reproduce and populate.

“So now all of a sudden, you have thousands and thousands of people that have been handed nets that have been living one way for hundreds of thousands of years.”

The nets allowed fishermen to scoop up fish before they could reach maturity, wiping out future generations of one of the region’s most vital food sources.

Galante Says Foundation ‘Absolutely Collapsed’ Fish Population

Galante said local communities had already developed their own methods for reducing mosquito exposure before outside organizations intervened.

“They don’t give a sh*t about malaria,” Galante said.

“They have their own way of dealing with malaria.

“They sit in smoky huts at night; they sleep with a campfire.

“Everything else, yes, they still get malaria, some of them, but they deal with it their own way.

“Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation come in, hand out millions of mosquito nets, absolutely collapse the entire population of fish that feed millions of people.

“Because these people just take the nets and fish all the baby fish out so that those fish don’t grow up to make substantial protein sources.

“So now these wonderful ‘philanthropists’ that have given out millions of nets, have destroyed an ecosystem, crashed a fish population and created widespread hunger for people that otherwise had plenty of resources, all because they were trying to ‘help’ with their mosquito nets.”

“Oh, God,” Rogan responded.

Galante described the outcome as an environmental and humanitarian catastrophe caused by wealthy outsiders who failed to understand how the nets would actually be used.

“It’s just like. It’s a f*cking disaster, dude,” Galante said.

“They’ve taken such a rich and important part of Africa, one of the most abundant freshwater fisheries in the world, and destroyed it.

“Because they’re ‘helping’ by handing out mosquito nets.”

“Good God,” Rogan replied.

‘They’re Still Giving Out Mosquito Nets’

Galante said the practice has continued despite the damage.

“Yeah, I know. Sorry,” Galante said.

“I told you I’d go on a rant, but it’s like, it’s so bad what’s happened over there.

“And they’re still giving out mosquito nets, by the way.

“And you literally watch these guys line up, take a mosquito net, and it never goes in their house.

“It goes straight to catching fish that are this big [tiny] for them to eat.”

“Oh, God…” Rogan responded.

WATCH:

Galante’s account presents a devastating indictment of global philanthropy imposed without regard for local realities.

The Gates Foundation entered the region promising to fight disease.

According to Galante, it instead helped destroy the food source that millions depended upon to survive.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/biologist-bill-gates-destroyed-entire-ecosystem-mosquito-agenda/

And.

READ MORE – Obama Gave Bill Gates Top Secret ‘Q Security Clearance’

Blogger Comment: The latest proposal to make organ harvesting the mechanism of euthanasia is likely to intensify concerns that Canada’s assisted suicide program continues to move way beyond the limits originally presented to the public…as the the current legal reality of voluntary euthanasia provides a new context for interpreting the Don’t Kill Rule,” they continued, arguing that euthanasia already “circumvents” the traditional prohibition on physicians intentionally causing death…another warning from history, but no-one is taking any notice, except those who have got their ear hard to the ground…as it is one of the cornerstones of the Globalist’s dream with their Globalist’s controlled killer pharma for the deployment and mass depopulation of humanity…euthanasia just being one of the elites’s global mechanisms for genocide on a level never envisioned by sane people, but where these people are literally insane when you dig deep…

.

Three physicians have sparked outrage after publishing a paper in one of the world’s most prestigious medical journals advocating a radical new form of euthanasia in which patients would be killed by having their vital organs surgically removed.

The proposal calls the practice “death by organ donation” and argues that patients seeking “assisted suicide” should be euthanized through organ harvesting rather than by lethal injection or a fatal drug overdose.

The authors contend that the potential increase in transplantable organs justifies rethinking long-standing ethical and legal barriers that prohibit removing vital organs from living patients.

The proposal has ignited alarm among pro-life advocates and medical ethicists, who warn it represents another step down a dangerous path as euthanasia continues to expand.

Doctors Seek to Rewrite Longstanding Medical Ethics

The paper, titled “Contextualizing the Dead Donor Rule in an Era of Voluntary Euthanasia,” was published earlier this month in The New England Journal of Medicine.

It was authored by Dr. Ian Ball, Dr. Carter Winberg, and Dr. Robert Truog.

“In death by organ donation, the patient’s authorization, experience, and outcome are not altered by whether death occurs moments before or during organ retrieval,” the physicians wrote.

The paper argues that legal euthanasia has fundamentally changed the ethical framework surrounding organ donation.

“Voluntary euthanasia creates a new ethical context, complicating the DDR and established approaches to organ donation: patients are not yet dead, but their death is imminent and results directly from voluntary medical intervention,” the doctors wrote.

“The current legal reality of voluntary euthanasia provides a new context for interpreting the Don’t Kill Rule,” they continued, arguing that euthanasia already “circumvents” the traditional prohibition on physicians intentionally causing death.

“In this landscape, the moral significance of strict temporal sequencing (post, not pre-mortem retrieval) is diminished,” the paper states.

The authors concluded that “ethical focus should therefore shift away from identifying a precise moment of biologic death and toward respecting patients’ autonomous decisions, ensuring that safeguards against coercion and exploitation are robust and advocating for a transparent and publicly accountable process.”

Under current law in Canada and most Western nations, healthy organs may only be removed after a patient has been declared clinically dead.

The proposal would reverse that longstanding principle by making the organ removal itself the direct cause of death.

Proposal Sparks Fierce Backlash

The paper was swiftly condemned by Conservative Member of Parliament Leslyn Lewis, who warned that the proposal threatens vulnerable patients and further erodes respect for human life.

“Reports of proposals to retrieve organs from MAiD patients before death raise profound ethical questions that Canadians should not dismiss,” Lewis wrote on X.

“These discussions underscore the importance of maintaining clear safeguards and ensuring that organ donation never compromises the value we place on human life.”

Lewis said Canadians “deserve thoughtful, transparent debate on these issues.”

“We must protect the vulnerable, uphold informed consent, and ensure that compassion and human dignity remain at the heart of our healthcare system,” she added.

Reports of proposals to retrieve organs from MAiD patients before death raise profound ethical questions that Canadians should not dismiss.

These discussions underscore the importance of maintaining clear safeguards and ensuring that organ donation never compromises the value… pic.twitter.com/iXVdU9gX5B

— Dr. Leslyn Lewis (@LeslynLewis) July 23, 2026

Even supporters of Canada’s medical establishment expressed concern.

University of Toronto bioethicist Kerry Bowman described the proposal as “very problematic.”

“There’s a lot of deep religious concern that if the cause of death is actually organ donation, from a religious point of view, it would be considered very problematic,” Bowman said.

He added that many people outside religious communities also find the proposal deeply disturbing.

“We have enough challenges in this country right now with (MAiD),” Bowman said.

“I would argue this is an unnecessary distraction at a difficult time.”

Canada’s Expanding Euthanasia Regime Faces Growing Scrutiny

Canada legalized euthanasia in 2016 under its Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program.

The country is now scheduled to expand eligibility in 2027 to include people suffering solely from mental illness under Bill C-7 unless the Liberal government intervenes.

The proposal comes as Canada’s euthanasia regime faces mounting criticism over cases in which vulnerable patients have claimed they were steered toward assisted suicide instead of receiving medical treatment or long-term care.

Canada’s Catholic bishops recently marked the tenth anniversary of legalized euthanasia by urging Canadians to reject what they described as growing complacency toward the practice.

The bishops said euthanasia can “never” be morally acceptable and called for renewed respect for the sanctity of human life.

Critics have also pointed to cases in which hospitals allegedly promoted MAiD to seriously ill patients, while others have described feeling pressured toward assisted suicide after struggling to obtain adequate healthcare.

Among them is disabled Canadian Roger Foley, who suffers from a degenerative neurological disease and has repeatedly said he is being pressured into accepting “assisted suicide” rather than receiving the care he needs to continue living.

Foley is pleading for help to continue living while Canada’s socialized healthcare system pushes to euthanize him for the “greater good.”

The latest proposal to make organ harvesting the mechanism of euthanasia is likely to intensify concerns that Canada’s assisted suicide program continues to move beyond the limits originally presented to the public.

Follow the source for the source… https://slaynews.com/canadian-doctors-chilling-plan-euthanize-patients-harvesting-organs/

And,

READ MORE – Man Saves Wife from Being Euthanized by Canadian Government, Flees to Texas for Cancer Treatment

Blogger Comment: This is what is coming to us all and where the State will make their mind up, no-one else, whether you live or die…the globalist’s dream, although they control govenment politicians and the health serrvices in all western nations now except only ‘four’ currently…so you know that their depopulation agenda is in full play and with no court being able to stop killing you or any loved member of your family, for if it has happens in one county like Franc, it then ALWAYS spreads to others like wildfire, the Globalist’s wildfire, as the Assisted Dying acts in all westen country where it has been allowed, have exploded over the last few years and what the Globalists demanded…another warning from history, but no-ne as usual is listening…

.

Just days after France legalized “assisted suicide,” the French government has now ruled that doctors can euthanize a conscious patient against his wishes by withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, even though he repeatedly says he wants to live.

The bombshell ruling has intensified fears that France’s euthanasia regime is already sliding toward a system in which doctors, not patients, ultimately decide who lives and who dies.

At the center of the case is Rémi, a man who regained consciousness after a devastating accident and now consistently tells doctors and his family that he wants to continue living after getting a second chance at life.

Despite his repeated requests, physicians at Paris’s taxpayer-funded Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital have sought to end the treatment keeping him alive, arguing it constitutes “unreasonable obstinacy.”

France’s Council of State, the country’s highest administrative court, has now sided with the doctors.

In one of the ruling’s most alarming declarations, the court stated that “the patient’s wishes are subject to the law.”

Conscious Patient’s Pleas Rejected

Rémi suffered severe neurological injuries after a serious accident and spent months in a coma.

Against the odds, he regained consciousness.

Although he remains profoundly disabled and dependent on life-sustaining treatment, he is able to communicate and has made his wishes unmistakably clear.

He wants to live.

His family has fully supported that decision and has fought to prevent doctors from withdrawing his treatment.

Hospital physicians nevertheless concluded that continuing treatment would merely prolong his life without any realistic prospect of meaningful recovery.

They invoked France’s Claeys-Leonetti Act, which governs end-of-life medical decisions for the nation’s socialized healthcare system.

The act permits doctors to discontinue treatment they deem medically futile or disproportionate.

The family challenged that decision through France’s legal system, arguing that because Rémi is conscious and capable of expressing his wishes, his desire to remain alive should be decisive.

The Council of State, a federal government body, rejected that argument.

The court ruled that the legal conditions allowing treatment to be withdrawn had been satisfied and upheld the doctors’ decision.

Critics Warn of Dangerous Shift in Medical Power

The ruling has fueled concerns that France’s newly expanded assisted-dying framework is transferring extraordinary power from patients and families to the medical profession.

For months, supporters of legalized euthanasia argued that the legislation was fundamentally about respecting patient autonomy and honoring an individual’s wishes.

Critics say the Rémi case exposes a glaring contradiction.

When a patient asks to die, personal autonomy is presented as paramount.

But when a conscious patient explicitly asks to live, that wish can be overridden if doctors determine continued treatment is medically unjustified.

Under French law, physicians make the final decision after completing a formal collegial review.

Family members are consulted but have no authority to block the withdrawal of treatment.

Even unanimous opposition from relatives is insufficient if the courts conclude that legal procedures have been followed.

‘A Gravely Serious Reversal’

The timing of the decision has intensified political controversy.

Coming only days after France approved assisted dying, opponents argue the case demonstrates exactly the type of expansion they warned lawmakers would eventually occur.

Grégor Puppinck, director of the European Centre for Law and Justice, described the ruling as unprecedented.

“This is the first time that doctors have decided to withdraw treatment, against the expressed wishes of a ‘conscious’ patient, thereby causing their death,” Puppinck said.

He contrasted the case with that of Vincent Lambert, whose death sparked international controversy after doctors withdrew life support despite objections from parts of his family.

Lambert, however, never regained consciousness and was unable to communicate his wishes.

Rémi’s case is fundamentally different.

He is conscious.

He has repeatedly stated that he wants to live.

Yet France’s highest administrative court has ruled that his expressed wishes do not prevent doctors from ending the treatment sustaining his life.

For opponents of the country’s new assisted-dying law, the decision represents what they describe as a profound reversal of patient autonomy, one in which an individual’s wishes are honored when requesting death but can be set aside when they’re begging to live.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/french-government-moves-euthanize-man-against-his-wishes/

And,

READ MORE – Man Saves Wife from Being Euthanized by Canadian Government, Flees to Texas for Cancer Treatment

Blogger Comment: That’s the good our western politicians have done for us in the West…destroyed nations from within, without a war…all planned of course, as its the Globalist’s strategy to control the world and to do that they have to destroy western civilization…and its as simple as that and by 2030 the Globalists golden year to take control they are well on their way to achieving this…looting, rapes and violence are all part of what is happening if you are attuned to ‘X’ and truth platforms that show you what is really going on and not relying if the Globalist controlled legacy lies media that they control…and added to the above, PM Pedro Sánchez is a Globalist WEF member, like all the leaders of the EU nearly and why things are so bad now in the EU…Judas would be proud of him…

.

Spain has deployed troops to the Spanish enclave of Ceuta after nearly 50,000 African migrants crossed into the territory by land and sea in just 24 hours, marking what is believed to be the largest single-day illegal immigration influx in European Union history.

Spain’s Interior Ministry estimated that approximately 49,000 migrants, mostly military-aged men, entered the tiny enclave, which has a permanent population of roughly 84,000.

Video from the scene showed thousands of migrants swimming toward Ceuta’s shoreline while others rushed across the land border with Morocco, overwhelming Spanish border security.

Authorities said at least 18 people died during the crossing.

WATCH:

🇪🇸 Insane footage from the Moroccan border with Spain: thousands of migrants are gathering at the border

This is exactly what Spanish Prime Minister Sanchez was aiming for. pic.twitter.com/Fb1pEKU0jj

— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) July 30, 2026

Spain Deploys Military as European Leaders Sound Alarm

Spain’s socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez ordered the military to Ceuta to help restore order and announced he would travel to the territory on Friday.

The unprecedented influx has sparked concern across Europe that migrants entering Ceuta could eventually gain access to the Schengen Area if granted legal status under Sánchez’s immigration policies.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni sharply criticized Spain’s handling of the crisis, calling the situation a threat to European security.

“The images coming from Ceuta are striking and demonstrate, once again, that uncontrolled illegal immigration poses a concrete threat to the security of Europe’s borders,” Meloni said.

“Italy will not stand by and watch.

“We are prepared to intervene to defend the borders and safety of citizens, including suspending the Schengen Area with Spain.”

Even during the height of Europe’s 2015 migrant crisis, the European Union recorded approximately 11,000 migrant arrivals on its busiest day, less than one-quarter of the number reported in Ceuta this week.

Court Ruling Opened New Route Into Ceuta

The surge comes weeks after Spain’s Supreme Court ruled that migrants intercepted at sea while attempting to reach Ceuta or the nearby enclave of Melilla could no longer be immediately returned to Morocco.

The court held that expedited “hot returns” could only be used against migrants attempting to cross the land border.

The ruling effectively created a different legal framework for migrants arriving by sea, prompting concerns that smugglers and migrants would exploit the route.

Ceuta and Melilla are the European Union’s only territories with land borders on the African continent, making them key entry points for migrants seeking access to Europe.

🇪🇸 Thousands of African migrants who illegally invaded Spain today are celebrating their arrival

Soon, Sánchez’s government will issue them legal documents, and they will disperse across Europe. pic.twitter.com/Yx5YDRrnXy

— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) July 30, 2026

Morocco’s Role Faces New Scrutiny

Questions have also emerged over Morocco’s role in the unprecedented migration surge.

Haizam Amirah Fernández, director of the Centre for Contemporary Arab Studies in Madrid, argued that such a large movement of people could not have occurred without Moroccan authorities being aware of it.

“The displacement of such a large number of people from Morocco to Ceuta could not have taken place without the Moroccan authorities knowing about it in advance or without them allowing such a phenomenon to occur,” Fernández wrote.

Relations between Madrid and Rabat have reportedly become increasingly strained following Spain’s closer energy ties with Algeria, Morocco’s regional rival.

France Tightens Border Controls

France responded by strengthening security along its border with Spain.

French Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez said authorities were immediately increasing inspections and deploying the country’s Rapid Reaction Border Force.

“In light of the situation in the Ceuta enclave, I issued instructions last night to immediately step up checks at the Spanish border,” Nuñez wrote.

“I am also deploying the Rapid Reaction Border Force to conduct in-depth checks.”

European governments also retain the ability to temporarily reinstate border controls under Schengen rules on national security grounds.

Sánchez Faces Mounting Political Pressure

The migration surge comes months after Sánchez granted legal residency to approximately 500,000 migrants under an amnesty program he described as an “act of justice.”

The deal will open up the socialist nation’s taxpayer-funded “free” services and benefits to all who apply.

Legal residency in Spain will also grant migrants access to roam freely through all EU member nations.

The policy has drawn criticism from conservative leaders across Europe, who argue it has encouraged illegal migration.

European People’s Party President Manfred Weber called for existing migrant return rules to be fully enforced.

France’s National Rally President Jordan Bardella warned that Spain’s immigration policies were opening Europe to increased security risks.

“For several days now, thousands of migrants have been flooding into the Ceuta enclave,” Bardella said.

“Tomorrow, they will be on our streets, against the will of the French people.”

Spain’s Vox Party leader Santiago Abascal described the scenes as an “invasion.”

“Pedro Sánchez is its main promoter and guilty of all its consequences,” Abascal wrote on X.

Follow the link for the source and evudence… https://slaynews.com/50000-african-migrants-flood-spanish-enclave-ceuta-largest-single-day-border-surge-eu-history/

And,

READ MORE – Trump Torches Socialist Spain, Calls for Cutting Off All Trade: ‘Terrible Partner in NATO’

Blogger Comment: This technology should never have been and I would not trust it just as I determined with the mRNA Covid-19 experimental-jabs and just look where that has got us now with a vast reduction in human populations in the western world especially (as the so-called third world countries could not afford them, so at times being poor can be a good thing ironically) that will continue now for decades to come and will have a knock-on effect from diseases and illhealth for all future generations to come (as once the mRNA is within a person, it is passed onto any future children to create a family or otherwise) through the mRNA jabs and that’s why they were created for by the Globalist elites who wish to take control of humanity through their Agenda 2030 (no it is not the UN’s Agenda 2030 in reality)…for all the politicians except for a few, took us down the road to have these experimental jabs…but where unfortunately our policians now, because of the devistation that these jabs have caused throughout the western world, will not tell us the ‘real’ truth…as they were ultimately responsible….

.

Scientists have taken a major step toward producing artificial human sperm in a laboratory as collapsing male fertility rates fuel fears that natural reproduction could eventually become impossible.

The breakthrough involved creating early-stage reproductive cells from human and monkey stem cells before growing them inside laboratory-made structures designed to imitate natural testes.

The study, published in the journal Cell Stem Cell, marks an early but significant advance toward the creation of fully developed lab-grown sperm.

Researchers Build Artificial ‘Mini-Testis’

Scientists began with induced pluripotent stem cells, known as iPSCs, taken from humans and rhesus macaques.

These blank-slate cells can be programmed to develop into almost any type of cell in the body.

Researchers exposed the cells to chemical signals that transformed them into primordial germ cell-like cells, which resemble the earliest embryonic cells that eventually develop into sperm.

Science website MedicalXpress explained how researchers then attempted to recreate the biological environment needed for those cells to mature.

“The researchers started with induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from humans and rhesus macaques, which are blank-slate cells that can be programmed to become almost any cell type,” the report notes.

“By exposing them to specific chemical signals, the researchers transformed them into primordial germ cell-like cells (PGCLCs), which are lab-grown versions of the earliest embryonic cells that eventually develop into germline cells, in this case sperm cells.

“Germ cells cannot mature on their own and require a supportive environment, or niche.

“To provide this, the researchers combined the human or monkey germ cells with supportive cells from mouse fetuses.

“Together, these cells self-organized into a three-dimensional structure called a xenogeneic reconstituted testis (xrTestis), which mimics the basic structure of a natural testis.

“Inside the mini-testis, seminiferous tubules began to form,” the report explains.

“These are coiled structures within the testes where sperm are made.

“What grew in this setup closely resembled both the appearance and gene activity patterns of real human germ cells during the early stages of sperm development.”

The cells did not become fully mature sperm, but the experiment demonstrated that scientists could reproduce crucial early stages of sperm development outside the human body.

Male Fertility Rates Continue to Collapse

The announcement comes amid growing alarm over declining sperm counts and other measures of male fertility around the world.

Professor Shanna Swan has warned that current global trends could leave the median man with a sperm count of zero by the middle of the century.

Under that scenario, half of all men would produce no sperm, while many of the remainder would produce so little that they would be functionally infertile.

Such a collapse, described as “spermageddon,” could make natural human reproduction impossible within a generation.

Swan has linked the decline to several factors, including obesity, sedentary lifestyles, and increasing exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

Those chemicals can interfere with the body’s natural hormonal systems and have become widespread in modern consumer products and the environment.

Artificial Reproduction Moves Closer

The new research remains at an early stage, and scientists have not yet produced fully functional human sperm using the process.

However, the successful creation of early germ cells inside a laboratory-grown testicular structure brings researchers closer to developing an artificial alternative to natural sperm production.

The technology could eventually be used to treat male infertility.

However, it also raises profound ethical and societal questions as scientists gain increasing control over the biological processes behind human reproduction.

As male fertility continues to decline, the prospect of laboratory-produced sperm is moving from science fiction toward a potential medical reality.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/scientists-lab-grown-sperm-male-fertility-crisis-deepens/

And,

READ MORE – Scientists Create Synthetic Cell That Can Feed, Grow, and Replicate

Blogger Comment: Although Musk is a Globalist, at least he discussed the threat to humanity through Ai, but where we have always to caution ourselves in falling into a false sense of security, as there are no good Globalists and everyone has to ask the basic question, even about Musk, where did they receive their funding from to develp into multibillionaires and their start-ups to $Trillionaire technogical behemoths in a mere part of a generation, for it was not just good ideas that got them there so quickly…for in earlier days we have their equivalents like JD Rockerfeller, who literally manupulated and corrupted the systems by cornering the markets…so there was no real competion and they could to agreat extent, ask what price of their commodities they wished…but these days its different and where these people suddenly appear in a matter of a few decades or less, but where the same question has to be applied in the real world, where did they get their funding from to build so quickly these technological giants and even where they may have gone through some rough times according to THEMSELVES…but was that really a part of the fairy-tail story…to passive people with and was it really true behind closed doors…?

.

Tech billionaire Elon Musk has issued a chilling warning that humans may no longer be “in charge of the world” within the next decade as artificial intelligence races toward replacing humanity.

Musk also revealed that he still believes there is a 10% to 20% chance AI could trigger a catastrophic outcome, underscoring concerns he has been raising for more than a decade.

The Tesla and SpaceX CEO made the remarks during a July 2026 interview with The Economist, where he outlined his latest assessment of the AI revolution rapidly reshaping the world.

‘Humans Will No Longer Be in Charge’

Speaking with The Economist Editor-in-Chief Zanny Minton Beddoes, Musk said he no longer sees any realistic way to slow the explosive pace of AI development.

“I can’t see any way to really stop this incredible momentum of AI and robots,” Musk said.

He then delivered one of his starkest predictions yet.

According to Musk, humans will “no longer be in charge of the world in 10 years” as AI systems eclipse human capabilities across nearly every field.

While Musk believes the technology could usher in an unprecedented era of prosperity, he warned the danger has not disappeared.

He repeated his long-standing estimate that there remains a 10% to 20% chance AI could produce catastrophic consequences and “wipe out humanity.”

“The probability of catastrophe is not zero,” Musk said.

Even so, Musk argued the more likely outcome is one of “incredible abundance for all,” predicting AI will surpass the combined intelligence of humanity within roughly five years and unleash extraordinary gains in productivity.

WATCH:

Warnings Stretch Back More Than a Decade

Musk has repeatedly sounded the alarm about artificial intelligence since long before the current AI boom.

In 2014, he famously warned that developing advanced AI was like “summoning the demon.”

Four years later, he argued artificial intelligence posed a greater threat to civilization than nuclear weapons.

Although his estimate of catastrophic risk has remained largely unchanged, his emphasis has shifted as AI capabilities have accelerated.

Rather than calling for AI development to be slowed, Musk now argues the technology’s momentum has become unstoppable.

He says attempting to halt progress is neither practical nor desirable given the global race to dominate artificial intelligence.

From AI Critic to AI Builder

Musk co-founded OpenAI in 2015, arguing that advanced artificial intelligence should be developed responsibly and with strong safeguards.

He later left the organization’s board before launching his own AI company, xAI, which developed the Grok family of artificial intelligence models.

His companies have since invested billions of dollars into AI computing infrastructure, making artificial intelligence central to Musk’s long-term vision.

Throughout 2026, Musk has increasingly promoted what he describes as an age of technological abundance driven by AI and robotics.

He has predicted automation could dramatically reduce the need for human labor while creating what he has called a future of “universal high income.”

Earlier this year, he even suggested traditional retirement planning could become largely obsolete as AI transforms the global economy.

Growing Alarm Over AI’s Future

Musk’s latest warning comes as concerns over artificial intelligence continue mounting among governments, researchers, and technology leaders.

Geoffrey Hinton, the Nobel Prize-winning computer scientist widely regarded as one of the pioneers of modern AI, has similarly estimated roughly a 10% chance that artificial intelligence could contribute to humanity’s extinction over the coming decades.

Musk’s comments have sparked intense debate online, with supporters arguing AI development cannot realistically be stopped because of international competition, while others question whether the technology’s enormous potential benefits justify accepting even a small risk of civilizational catastrophe.

As companies continue pouring billions of dollars into ever more powerful AI systems, Musk’s latest warning serves as another reminder that the race to build superintelligence is accelerating and humanity may not remain in control for much longer.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/elon-musk-warns-ai-annihilation-humans-charge-10-years/

And,

READ MORE – Anthropic Hires Economist Who Argues AI Growth Justifies Risk of Human Extinction