• U.S Birth Rate Plunges Below Sustainable Level

    Blogger Comment: The massive increase in excess deaths and in the significant increase in new birth deaths (in or outside the Womb)  in American and all western nations (China was far less significant), should have alerted the Biden Administration and all western governments to look into what is happening, but for some very strange reason this time, none of them have investigated the cause of these millions of deaths throughout all western nations.

    America’s birth rate has just plunged to its lowest level in over four decades, according to the latest figures.

    The U.S. birth rate is currently sitting far below the “replacement rate” which is required to keep the population at a sustainable level.

    According to the data, published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), fewer babies were born in America in 2023 than in any year since 1979.

    The data was revealed in a new report from the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics.

    There were 3.59 million babies born in 2023, down 2% from 3.66 million recorded in 2022.

    This number is the lowest since 1979 when 3.4 million babies were born.

    Karen Benjamin Guzzo, director of the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, told The Wall Street Journal that fewer Americans want to have children while many are delaying starting a family.

    “People are making rather reasoned decisions about whether or not to have a child at all,” Guzzo said.

    “More often than not, I think what they’re deciding is, ‘Yes, I’d like to have children, but not yet.’”

    This number is the lowest since 1979 when 3.4 million babies were born.

    Karen Benjamin Guzzo, director of the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, told The Wall Street Journal that fewer Americans want to have children while many are delaying starting a family.

    “People are making rather reasoned decisions about whether or not to have a child at all,” Guzzo said.

    “More often than not, I think what they’re deciding is, ‘Yes, I’d like to have children, but not yet.’”America’s declining total fertility rate peaked at 3.75 births per woman after World War II and has since collapsed to about 1.617, well below the replacement rate of 2.1.

    The total fertility rate is an estimate of the number of babies a woman would have in her lifetime; 2.1 is ​the level needed for a generation to replace itself.

    A nation without children is a nation without a future.

    Meanwhile, deaths are continuing to rise as births fall.

    The intersection of deaths exceeding births per year appears imminent.

    A nation without children is a nation without a future.

    Meanwhile, deaths are continuing to rise as births fall.

    The intersection of deaths exceeding births per year appears imminent.

    America’s birth rates for most age groups are all declining, except for women ages 35-39 and 40-44.

    Rates are per 1,000 women in specified age groups.

    Only the Hispanic fertility rate has rebounded.

    Fertility rates are births per 1,000 women aged 15–44 in specified group

    The total birth rate has been well under the level of replacement since 2007.

    Elon Musk has been warning the public about the threat posed to humanity by plunging birth rates around the world.

    In a recent interview posted on X, Musk explains:

    “There are certainly some big risks that humanity faces.

    “Population collapse is a really big deal, but I wish more people would think about…the birth rate is far below what’s needed to sustain civilization at its current level.”

    Earlier this month, Musk wrote in a post on X:

    “Any nation with a birth rate below replacement will eventually cease to exist.”

    https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?creatorScreenName=Slay_News_&dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=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%3D%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1779903587276964126&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fslaynews.com%2Fnews%2Fus-birth-rate-plunges-below-sustainable-level%2F&sessionId=b2e85099aa78ccb988c8f98a7957586693dcb018&siteScreenName=Slay_News_&theme=light&widgetsVersion=2615f7e52b7e0%3A1702314776716&width=500px

    Follow the Link for the Article… U.S Birth Rate Plunges Below Sustainable Level

    And, READ MORE – WEF: Depopulation Will ‘Save Elites’ & ‘Drown the Rest’

    And last but the most potent prediction that was in 2017

    “Why is the influential military arms data firm The Deagel corporation, a minor branch of US military intelligence and one of the many secretive organizations stating that in 2025 there will be a massive decline in populations of every western nation?” – note that Deagel took this web listing prediction down sometime in 2020, but the “Wayback Machine” has still got it…

    https://nobulart.com/deagel-2025-forecast

    The biggest in the predicted drop in 2017 within Western Nations is the UK (from a population of 65,650,000 in 2017 to a mere 14,517,860 in  2025) followed by the USA (from a population of 326,620,000 in 2017 to a mere  99,553,100 in  2025). These figures seem absolutely mad, but the nearer we get to 2025, things do appear to be accelerating in the alternative Media arena (that is censored, but you can see the other side of the story that we are not told). Therefore immigration does have a purpose therefore if and when these prediction become the truth instead of conspiracies, which basically “Deagel” is not really into as a ‘leading’ military analysist who is in the “intelligence know” working for for the US government (on paper anyway, but ultimately controlled by the Globalists)…and their “2030 Great Reset” 

    And,
    Leaked Pfizer Docs Expose Plan to Depopulate Earth by 2025

  • Senate Republicans Challenge Hidden Measure for $5.7 Billion Refugee Funding

    Blogger Comment: Just another day at the office for the Corrupt Democrat Party that has just been uncovered that was buried…but ONLY $5,690million, so not a big deal I suppose based upon their Biden track record…

    .

    Two Senate Republicans are raising a red flag after uncovering a hidden measure in a hefty spending bill that could pour billions into refugee programs with questionable oversight.

    Sens. Rand Paul (R-KY) and Mike Lee (R-UT) are firmly against a $5.69 billion provision for refugee assistance that was found buried in the fiscal year 2026 appropriations bill for the Departments of Labor and Health and Human Services (HHS).

    This amount, triple what was budgeted before former President Joe Biden’s administration, has sparked fears of rampant fraud and a rollback of hard-won limits on welfare for noncitizens.

    As head of the Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee, Paul is gearing up to fight.

    He is proposing an amendment to stop this funding and pushing legislation to cut all welfare benefits for immigrants, including refugees.

    “The big spenders in Congress are back in DC, hoping to pass a bill that spends billions on refugee benefits despite widespread reports of fraud,” Paul warned.

    His sharp critique raises serious questions of why taxpayer dollars are being risked on programs so prone to misuse.

    Meanwhile, Lee is championing his SAVE Act to mandate proof of citizenship for voting while calling for tougher immigration enforcement policies.

    Opponents of the bill argue that this nearly $6 billion for refugee resettlement undercuts Trump-era measures that used executive action to restrict noncitizen access to federal benefits.

    During Biden’s tenure, expansive immigration policies have welcomed hundreds of thousands of refugees, including about 200,000 evacuees from 2021 to 2023, with many from Afghanistan and Somalia.

    A chilling case saw an Afghan evacuee charged with shooting two National Guard members near the White House, killing one, just before Thanksgiving, in a tragic example of the dangers of hasty resettlement without strict checks.

    Under current rules, resettled refugees can access federal programs like SNAP, HUD assistance, and emergency Medicaid, as noted by the National Immigration Law Center.

    Research from the Center for Immigration Studies shows 80% of Somalians resettled in Minnesota rely on public assistance, casting doubt on the long-term viability of such support.

    Minnesota has also emerged as a cautionary tale, with state Medicaid programs reportedly exposed to fraud costing billions, amplifying concerns over unchecked federal spending.

    Adding to the frustration, the so-called “Big Beautiful Bill” once eliminated Medicaid coverage for refugees and asylees, a protection now seemingly undone by this new proposal.

    “New Year’s resolution: stop nonsense like this, pass my SAVE Act to require proof of citizenship to vote, and codify the MAGA agenda, especially on immigration and enforcement,” Sen. Lee urged.

    His blunt challenge questions whether Congress prioritizes fiscal responsibility or political posturing.

    With billions on the line, the stance of Paul and Lee serves as a reminder that every dollar spent demands scrutiny, especially when past policies aimed at curbing abuse are at risk of being dismantled.

    Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/senate-republicans-challenge-hidden-measure-5-7-billion-refugee-funding/

    And,

    READ MORE – AG Bondi Deploys Federal Prosecutors to Minnesota to Investigate Somali Fraudsters

  • United Nations Chief Warns Trump: U.S Has ‘Legal Obligation’ to Pay Dues

    Blogger Comment: It appears that the corrupt United Nations thinks that it can force Trump and the American people to pay for their corruption that has been going on for years with no results for the people of the world…but Trump is different and 100% for the people, not the Davos Globalists that the UN serves now in reality…

    .

    United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres issued a warning to President Donald Trump after the White House announced a sweeping withdrawal from dozens of international organizations.

    In a message aimed at Trump, Guterres warned Washington that the United States remains legally obligated to pay its U.N. dues.

    The Trump administration revealed on Wednesday that the U.S. is withdrawing from 66 international organizations, roughly half of which are affiliated with the United Nations.

    The announcement is prompting panic and confusion among senior U.N. officials.

    Despite the pullout, Guterres’s office insists that financial obligations remain unchanged.

    On Thursday, Guterres spokesman Stéphane Dujarric said:

    “Assessed contributions to the UN regular budget and peacekeeping budget, as approved by the General Assembly, are a legal obligation under the UN Charter for all member states, including the US.”

    Dujarric added that the affected U.N. programs would continue operating regardless of the U.S. decision.

    However, it is unclear how the U.N. expects to force the United States to fund the globalist body’s organizations.

    According to U.N. officials, the organization learned of the withdrawals through media reports and White House social media posts, with no formal notification delivered directly to U.N. leadership.

    The list of abandoned initiatives reportedly includes major programs focused on promoting radical left-wing ideology, all funded primarily by American tax dollars.

    President Trump has said these programs “operate contrary to U.S. national interests.”

    The United States remains the single largest contributor to the U.N.’s regular budget, paying the maximum allowed share of 22 percent as the world’s largest economy.

    Those contributions are mandatory under the U.N. Charter.

    The U.S. currently owes the organization approximately $1.5 billion.

    Under U.N. rules, failure to pay could ultimately result in the loss of America’s voting rights in the General Assembly.

    “We’re not going to renegotiate the charter,” Dujarric said flatly.

    The Trump administration’s move also halts funding for a number of international initiatives not formally tied to the U.N., part of a broader effort to rein in foreign spending since the president began his second term last January.

    U.S. officials have openly discussed plans to cut billions of dollars in international aid and funding for global organizations, arguing that taxpayer money should be prioritized for domestic needs.

    Other Western nations are also reassessing their commitments.

    France and the United Kingdom have signaled they may divert humanitarian funding toward military spending amid growing global instability.

    While the administration has made clear it is willing to walk away from institutions it views as hostile to U.S. interests, the U.N.’s leadership is now signaling that disengagement will not exempt Washington from its financial responsibilities, setting the stage for a looming standoff between the Trump White House and the world body.

    Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/united-nations-chief-warns-trump-us-legal-obligation-pay-dues/

    And,

    READ MORE – Globalists Panic: Trump Is Destroying ‘World Order’

  • RFK Jr Unveils Trump Admin’s New MAHA Dietary Guidelines

    Blogger Comment: At least one western Leader and his Admoinistraion are looking after the health of their people in President Trump in the USA, unlike most other western nations where the Glkobalist control has stopped all good health ever happening to their people and where only four wesrtern nations are not now controlled behind the scenes but the Davos Globalists, The USA, Hungary, Slovakia and Italy…hard to believe but pefectly true 100%…

    .

    President Donald Trump’s administration has released a new set of federal dietary guidelines that will influence meals served to millions of Americans across government programs, schools, and federal institutions.

    The new guidelines were revealed by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins and are designed to align with the Trump administration’s Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) agenda.

    The 10-page guidance document emphasizes protein, dairy, “healthy fats,” fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, with Kennedy and Rollins describing the approach as a return to whole, nutrient-dense food.

    “The new guidelines recognize that whole, nutrient-dense food is the most effective path to better health and lower health care costs,” Kennedy said at a press conference in Washington.

    Rollins said previous administrations from both parties promoted highly processed foods at the expense of traditional nutrition.

    “For decades, decades, under both Republicans and Democrats, federal incentives have promoted low-quality, highly-processed foods, and pharmaceutical interventions instead of prevention,” she said.

    “As a result, nutrient-dense whole foods grown by America’s farmers and ranchers have been increasingly displaced.

    “The Trump administration is acutely aware of this danger, and today this announcement is making a major step in doing something about it.”

    The guidelines instruct Americans to eat appropriate quantities based on factors including age and weight, while prioritizing protein at every meal and consuming a variety of sources such as meat, beans, and nuts.

    The document advises Americans to consume full-dairy products without added sugars, eat fruits and vegetables throughout the day, choose whole grains, and incorporate “healthy fats” such as eggs and avocados.

    While allowing saturated fats, the guidelines state that they should not exceed 10 percent of daily calories.

    Citing widespread reliance on ultra-processed foods such as pizza and soda, the guidelines advise limiting refined carbohydrates, added sugars, and processed products.

    “No amount of added sugars or non-nutritive sweeteners is recommended or considered part of a healthy or nutritious diet,” the guidelines state.

    They also encourage limiting alcohol consumption.

    The updated standards will apply across major federal programs, including public school meal plans, the military, Veterans Affairs facilities, and nutrition assistance programs such as Head Start.

    Federal dietary guidelines are updated every five years.

    The previous 2020 edition spanned 164 pages and included similar warnings about sugary foods and beverages.

    A 421-page advisory draft circulated in 2024 had urged reductions in meat consumption, avoidance of full-fat dairy, and greater reliance on plant-based proteins.

    Officials said the new guidelines are intended to address worsening national health trends, including rising obesity rates.

    Kennedy said the American Medical Association and American Academy of Pediatrics provided input on the framework.

    Dr. Bobby Mukkamala, president of the AMA, said the guidance appropriately focuses on reducing highly processed foods, sweetened drinks, and sodium.

    “The Guidelines affirm that food is medicine and offer clear direction patients and physicians can use to improve health,” he said, adding that the association will work with physicians to apply the recommendations in clinical settings.

    The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine praised some elements of the guidance but urged stronger warnings about animal products.

    “Americans already get enough protein,” Dr. Neal Barnard said in a statement.

    “If the Guidelines are going to push for increased protein consumption, it should come from plants.”

    Follow the link for ther source… https://slaynews.com/news/rfk-jr-unveils-trump-admins-new-maha-dietary-guidelines/

    And,

    READ MORE – CIA Insider: Trump ‘Rescued’ Maduro to Blow Whistle on Democrats

  • Canadian Government Euthanizes ‘Young & Healthy’ 26-Year-Old for ‘Depression’

    Blogger Comment: In Canada now 76% of people Euthanized by their government are not either terminally ill and we are intending to go down this same road as well…for this is not caring or humanitarian in dimension, but killing people legally that should not be and I remember when this was called pure murder…and if the UK’s politicians allow Leadbeater’s Bill to become law, we as a nation will be signing up to illegal genocide in many ways and I do not say this lightly…it is as though many politicians in the UK’s House of Commons and the Lords don’t really know what is happening literally in the Western world and how Euthanasia is being used as an extended arm of human populations with the dire excesses of deaths that are now occurring…where in Canada now, it is the 4th highest reason for people dying and accounting for over 5% of the Canadian human population…every year and growing at an alarming rate…

    .

    Canada’s euthanasia regime has claimed yet another young life after a 26-year-old man suffering from depression was euthanized by the government’s assisted death program, despite previously being rejected for the lethal injection by a doctor who said he was too “young and healthy” to be killed.

    The devastating revelation was shared by his mother, Margaret Marsilla, in a heartbreaking Facebook post, who accused the socialized healthcare system’s doctors of using a “loophole” to kill her son.

    Marsilla announced that her son, Kiano, had been killed through the Canadian government’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) system.

    After previous failed attempts to euthanize Kiano for diabetes and visual impairment, he was eventually killed for “depression,” which was classified as “mental illness,” according to his devastated mom.

    “With a broken heart, I am sharing that my baby boy Kiano passed away … after being euthanized,” Marsilla wrote.

    The death was approved by Ellen Wiebe, a Vancouver abortionist and euthanasia practitioner, according to Marsilla.

    Wiebe, also known as “Dr. Death,” has ended the lives of more than 400 patients. (Blogger additions, just like the UK’s equivalent of Dr. Shipman, but where these deaths were legal and through the Canadian government’s legislation)

    Kiano was first diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes when he was four and later became visually impaired.

    In adult life, he struggled with depression brought on by his condition.

    Four years earlier, his mother successfully intervened to stop a scheduled euthanasia in Ontario.

    “Four years ago, here in Ontario, we were able to stop his euthanasia and get him some help,” Marsilla wrote.

    “He was alive because people stepped in when he was vulnerable and not capable of making a final, irreversible decision.”

    In 2022, Marsilla launched a public petition to halt her son’s planned euthanasia at Toronto’s MAiD House.

    At the time, she expressed disbelief that her son had even been approved.

    “Can you believe it?” she wrote then.

    “The doctor literally has given him the gun to kill himself.”

    Marsilla said she pleaded for real care, treatment for depression, therapy, family involvement, and hope.

    “None of this happened,” she wrote.

    “Just an application that lasted for 90 days, and then approval and MAiD House!

    “There was no attempt to connect with family members, no assistance to get proper help or medication for this young man, just an approval.”

    On September 28, 2022, Kiano confirmed that public pressure had worked.

    He revealed in an interview that after a wave of calls to his doctor, the physician “withdrew his role in my care plan.”

    Kiano then searched for another MAiD assessor and failed.

    One doctor explicitly told him he was “young and healthy” and should not be considered for euthanasia.

    Three years later, that safeguard collapsed.

    “Tragically, the Canadian system later allowed something very different to happen in Vancouver,” Marsilla wrote.

    “A doctor named DR ELLEN WIEBE AKA DR DEATH #2 approved his death based on mental illness.”

    The approval occurred despite euthanasia for mental illness being officially banned in Canada until 2027.

    “Somehow, DR DEATH #2 found a loophole in the system, one that now demands to be exposed so that no other parent has to endure this,” she wrote.

    Marsilla did not hold back in describing what she believes this represents.

    “This is disgusting on every level,” she wrote.

    “No compassion. No protection.

    “No effort to save a life, only to end it.

    “This is not healthcare,” she warned.

    “This is a failure of ethics, accountability, and humanity.”

    She vowed to pursue accountability and to stand with other families harmed by Canada’s euthanasia regime.

    “No parent should ever have to bury their child because a system—and a doctor—chose death over care, help, or love.”

    Dr. Wiebe has previously faced investigations and complaints over her euthanasia practices, including a 2017 incident in which she covertly entered an Orthodox Jewish nursing home and euthanized a patient.

    Despite objections from residents, including Holocaust survivors, regulators ruled she had done nothing wrong.

    Other complaints from coroners and family members have met similar outcomes.

    Kiano’s death has reignited alarm over the direction of Canada’s assisted-death policies, particularly for the mentally ill.

    In response to Marsilla’s post, another mother revealed her family fled Canada altogether after witnessing the trajectory of the MAiD system.

    “We also have a daughter who struggles with mental illness,” she wrote.

    “When I saw and read around 2020 that they were considering this, we gathered the family … and moved back to Hungary with her to save her from this.”

    She described how her daughter received compulsory treatment abroad, stabilized, found work, and is now engaged.

    “In Canada,” she wrote, “citing ‘personal rights,’ this would have been the end.”

    Kiano’s death stands as a grim warning that, in modern Canada, vulnerability is no longer met with protection, but with a lethal injection.

    Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-government-euthanizes-young-healthy-26-year-old-depression/#

    And,

    READ MORE – NYT Demands Mentally Ill Woman Euthanized by Canadian Government

  • Globalists Panic: Trump Is Destroying ‘World Order’

    Blogger Comment: The only people that Trump is making the world more dangerous for is the Globalist WEF elites in Davos and their puppet political leaders in the West (where only four western nation are not now controlled from Switzerland, The USA, Hungary, Slovakia and Italy), and not the people and where Trump is the only one who can save western civilization now from the evil of the Globalist’s insane mindset of depopulation and where genocide is a word nearer to what is coming from these totally sinister people who consider that humans are causing all the harm in the world that will certainly happen after they have taken control in what they call THEIR “Golden Year of 2030″…

    .

    Globalist leaders across Europe are openly panicking as President Donald Trump continues to dismantle the so-called “rules-based international order” that Western elites spent decades constructing.

    Their fear is no longer whispered behind closed doors, as globalist world leaders scramble to preserve the crumbling “world order,” with concerns now being voiced publicly.

    German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier lashed out this week, taking direct aim at Trump’s America-first approach to global diplomacy.

    Steinmeier, who is listed as one of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) so-called “agenda contributors,” is accusing Trump of abandoning the global order that previous U.S. presidents once helped build.

    In a warning to other globalist leaders, Steinmeier declared that Trump’s actions are making the world “more dangerous.”

    Steinmeier’s remarks came just days after Trump ordered a daring U.S. commando operation into Caracas that resulted in the capture of Venezuelan socialist dictator Nicolás Maduro.

    It also comes as the Trump administration renewed its push to acquire Greenland from Denmark.

    According to Reuters, during a symposium at the Koerber Foundation on Wednesday, Steinmeier said:

    “There is the breakdown of values by our most important partner, the USA, which helped build this world order.”

    He warned that Trump’s approach risks turning the world into what he described as “a den of robbers,” where powerful nations take what they want, and weaker states are left defenseless.

    Revealing deep anxiety among European leaders who have relied on U.S. restraint and predictability for decades, Steinmeier added:

    “Attempts are being made to push even medium-sized states — and that includes us — to the margins of history.”

    French President Emmanuel Macron echoed the alarm.

    Macron, a fellow globalist leader and WEF “agenda contributor,” is warning of growing “risks to the international order in which we live.”

    The French president complained that the United States is “turning away from some of its allies” and abandoning international rules it once promoted, whether in trade, security, or global institutions.

    He previously said he did not approve of “the method” Washington used to remove Maduro from power.

    Trump, however, has made clear that he has little interest in seeking approval from global bureaucrats or foreign capitals.

    In an interview with The New York Times published Thursday, the president dismissed the idea that international law restrains him.

    “I don’t need international law,” Trump said.

    “My own morality. My own mind.

    “It’s the only thing that can stop me.”

    The Trump administration has framed its military action in Venezuela as a targeted law-enforcement operation aimed at capturing Maduro.

    Trump has repeatedly accused Maduro of narcotics trafficking and criminal activity.

    Maduro pleaded not guilty in a New York courtroom on Monday, calling himself “a prisoner of war.”

    Meanwhile, Venezuela’s remaining power structure condemned the U.S. raid as a violation of national sovereignty.

    However, despite initial complaints, the nation’s interim leaders are now “cooperating” and have agreed to a new deal with the U.S. on oil and American-made goods, Trump revealed.

    To globalist leaders, Trump’s message is unmistakable as he asserts that the era of U.S. deference to international norms is over.

    To their dismay, America is once again acting like a sovereign power.

    The architects of the old world order are watching it crumble in real time.

    Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/globalists-panic-trump-destroying-world-order/

    And,

    READ MORE – CIA Insider: Trump ‘Rescued’ Maduro to Blow Whistle on Democrats

  • UK Government Expands Censorship Laws to Begin Preemptively Scanning Private Messages for ‘Illegal Content’

    Blogger Comment:The greatest destroyer ever of the British dream and the British people’s quickly approaching unprecedented and ultimate fate in no less than 4-years now…the ubiquitous regime that is the UK’s Labour Party under the control of the Davos appointed WEF Prime Minster Starmer, where by 2030 it will be total suppressed together with their people, when the Globalists have total control of this once proud and strong nation that was once called Great Britain…for this is clear now and one of the final warnings to the rest of the westen world, as you are on the list too for this same outcome and will be fully captive to this most repressive regime of all time in the history of numanity…believe me it is coming now and we had all thought that we had left the 1930s Germany nightmare behind us forever and the genocide of Europe, but not so it now definitely appears, as Europe including the UK as well this time, will be consumed by these dark forces of the Globalist elites and controlleed by their puppet leaders, where only four western nations are free from the stranglehold of the world’s most powerful elites in Davos…

    .

    Britain has taken a major step toward full-scale digital surveillance, with a sweeping expansion of the UK’s Orwellian censorship laws now in force that legally compels tech platforms to scan, detect, and suppress “illegal” user content before anyone can see it.

    The latest expansion is an update to the socialist UK government’s anti-free speech Online Safety Act.

    The new Online Safety Act 2023 (Priority Offenses) (Amendment) Regulations 2025 took effect on January 8, 2026.

    Under the new updates, the government elevates so-called “priority offenses,” including cyberflashing and encouraging or assisting serious self-harm, into the highest enforcement tier under the Act.

    That designation triggers the most extreme compliance requirements in the law.

    Under the new rules, any service that allows user interaction, from private messaging apps and social media platforms to forums and search engines, is now required to monitor communications at scale for “illegal content.”

    Platforms are now under orders to preemptively block prohibited material before users even encounter it.

    This is not moderation after the fact.

    It is preemptive censorship by design.

    To comply, platforms are expected to deploy automated surveillance systems, including AI-driven scanning tools that analyze text, images, and video in real time, even inside spaces traditionally regarded as private.

    The UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) showcased the policy shift in a promotional video depicting a smartphone automatically scanning AirDropped images and issuing a warning that an “unwanted nude” had been detected.

    The message is unmistakable and confirms that private digital communications are now subject to continuous background monitoring.

    In its official announcement, DSIT said the new regulations force companies to “take proactive steps to prevent this vile content before users see it,” framing the move as part of a government pledge to halve violence against women and girls within a decade.

    Technology Secretary Liz Kendall openly celebrated the expansion.

    “We’ve cracked down on perpetrators of this vile crime — now we’re turning up the heat on tech firms,” Kendall said.

    “Platforms are now required by law to detect and prevent this material.”

    So-called “Safeguarding” Minister Jess Phillips echoed the sentiment.

    “By placing the responsibility on tech companies to block this vile content before users see it, we are preventing women and girls from being harmed in the first place,” she said.

    But behind the moral framing lies a structural transformation of the Internet itself.

    To meet the law’s requirements, platforms must perform mass scanning of user-generated content, including private messages, shared images, and uploads, regardless of whether users are suspected of wrongdoing.

    Automated filters are now expected to judge legality, intent, and context instantly, a task they are notoriously bad at.

    However, relying on automation means that false positives are inevitable, lawful speech will be swept up, and “free” expression will be chilled.

    By forcing companies to predict and prevent “illegal content” before it exists in public view, the UK is embedding censorship directly into the infrastructure of online communication.

    This is not about safety after harm occurs.

    It is about continuous surveillance as the default condition.

    Large sections of the digital public square, and private conversation, are now treated as environments to be monitored, filtered, and controlled, with privacy relegated to a secondary concern rather than a fundamental right.

    What the government calls “online safety,” critics increasingly see it as a permanent surveillance regime quietly normalized under the banner of protection.

    Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/uk-government-expands-censorship-laws-begin-preemptively-scanning-private-messages-illegal-content/

    And,

    READ MORE – UK Government Pushes ‘Cradle to Grave’ Digital ID for Babies Plan

  • WEF Member Calls for 86% Reduction in World’s Population

    Blogger Comment: An older Blog, but still extremely important as it details in overview, the Davos Globalist’s thinking on the depopulation of Humanity and we cannot forget what is their mindset as evil and insane as it is…

    .

    A celebrated member of the globalist World Economic Forum (WEF) has called for a staggering 86 percent reduction in the population of humans, arguing that the goal can be achieved “peacefully.”

    The call was made by Dennis Meadows, one of the main authors of the Club of Rome’s 1972 pro-depopulation book “The Limits to Growth.”

    Meadows is an honorary member of the Club of Rome and a member of the World Economic Forum.

    Despite his book being published over 50 years ago, his ideology is still very anti-human.

    Meadows argues that most of the world’s population must be wiped out so that the survivors can “have freedom” and a “high standard of living.”

    During a 2017 interview, Meadows claims that genocide of 86% of the world’s population is “inevitable.”

    However, he insists that a “benevolent” dictatorship could accomplish the mass de-population “peacefully.”

    “We could [ ] have eight or nine billion, probably,” he says of the world’s growing population.

    “If we have a very strong dictatorship which is smart … and [people have] a low standard of living,” Meadows says as he explains how the population reduction agenda could be triggered.

    “But we want to have freedom and we want to have a high standard of living so we’re going to have a billion people.

    “And we’re now at seven, so we have to get back down.

    “I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience.”

    WATCH:

    It’s no coincidence that Meadows’ words echo the words in the 1995 report titled “United Nations Agenda 2030: Global Biodiversity Assessment.”

    The report, first presented at the United Nations “climate change” conference COP1, states:

    An ‘agricultural world’ in which most human beings are peasants, should be able to support 5 to 7 billion people …

    In contrast, a reasonable estimate for an industrialised world society at the present North American material standard of living would be one billion.

    What the advocates of this ideology seem to omit mentioning is that, according to Worldometer, the population of the world is currently over 8 billion.

    In 1972, the Club of Rome’s “The Limits to Growth published the results of computer-simulated forecasts calculated by a team of statisticians recruited from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”).

    It was the culmination of a two-year study undertaken by the MIT team under the nominal heading of Jay Forrester and Dennis Meadows.

    “The Limits to Growth” is arguably the most influential book about “sustainability.”

    It became the blueprint of the new anti-humanist movement that birthed today’s Green New Deal agenda.

    The book is not only Malthusian in principle, but a survey of its bibliography reveals that it is also backed by extensive citations from an array of Malthusian-eugenicists and affiliated institutions that have been dedicated to population control.

    A 2012 article celebrating the book’s 40th anniversary stated: “It is worth revisiting Limits [to Growth] today because, more than any other book, it introduced the concept of anthropocentric [human caused] climate change to a mass audience.”

    Another reason to revisit “The Limits to Growth” is to highlight the influence it had and still has on supranational organizations.

    For decades, New Age guru Barbara Marx Hubbard – who called for one-fourth of the human population to be culled to usher in a New World Order – championed transhumanism and Malthusian sustainable development.

    The ideology is the crux of WEF founder and Chairman Klaus Schwab’s “Great Reset” and “Fourth Industrial Revolution” agendas.

    Hubbard’s Malthusian overpopulation theories were partly inspired by “The Limits to Growth.”

    In fact, in Hubbard’s “Book of Co-Creation,” there are multiple passages that warn of Malthusian “limits to growth” that could lead to ecological catastrophes.

    She also met personally with Club of Rome co-founder, Aurelio Peccei who prompted the World Economic Forum to adopt the Malthusian tenets of “The Limits to Growth” at the WEF’s Third Annual Meeting in 1973.

    And now we have Meadows boldly declaring that he hopes that a dictatorship will slowly and “peacefully” cull 86% of the world’s population.

    This theory hasn’t escaped other members of the World Economic Forum either.

    WEF elites are frequently touring a world with a massively reduced population.

    As Slay News has reported, Yuval Noah Harari, a top WEF member and senior advisor to Schwab, declared last year that “we just don’t need the vast majority of the population” in today’s world.

    According to Harari, most of the general public have now become “redundant” and will be of little use to the global elite in the future.

    Harari, who describes himself as a historian and futurist, argues that modern technologies like artificial intelligence “make it possible to replace the people.”

    And more recently, Harari gloated in September that “climate change” will create a “technological Noah’s Ark” on Earth that will only be beneficial to “elites.”

    Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/wef-member-calls-86-reduction-worlds-population/

    And,

    READ MORE: WEF Advisor: ‘We Don’t Need Vast Majority of Population’

  • Through Her Stupidity and Fanaticism, Kaja Kallas is Threatening Europe’s Vital Interests (and even sentencing Europeans to their ‘Virtual’ Death through their total elimination “within” society…and where the ‘Gateway Pundit’ appears to have got it 100% right)…

    Blogger Comment: The EU’s top bureacrats like their Foreign top dog Kaja Kallas are destroying the EU inside out, just like US Vice-President Vance stated to their face at a security meeting in 2025 and called it the ‘Enemy Within’…where this story revolves around due to its severity and human reach to “all Europeans” now…the outcome of course when her friends the Davos Globalists obtain total control of all Europe in 2030, now controlling all nations (including the UK) except Hungary, Slovakia and Italy (and The USA due to Trump)…

    “The Baud case

    And then there is the Baud case, which has been little discussed, given that Mr. Baud’s administrative excommunication came in the midst of the Russian asset crisis.

    Jacques Baud, a former Swiss army colonel and ex-strategic intelligence agent, was sanctioned by the EU on December 15, 2025. These sanctions, decided by the Council of the EU, target individuals accused of participating in Russian destabilization activities, in particular through the manipulation of information and the dissemination of propaganda in connection with the war in Ukraine—a category so vague that it can encompass almost anything and anyone.

    The EU accuses Jacques Baud of acting as a “spokesperson for Russian propaganda” and spreading conspiracy theories. In particular, he is accused of claiming that Ukraine orchestrated its own invasion to facilitate its accession to NATO. According to the official text, he supported or implemented actions undermining the stability and security of Ukraine through disinformation. This wording criminalizes freedom of expression by administrative decree.

    In concrete terms, the measures include freezing his assets in the EU, banning him from entering or transiting through EU territory, and prohibiting European entities from providing him with funds or doing business with him. A modern arsenal of civil elimination.

    Jacques Baud vigorously contests these accusations, denies any links with Moscow, and has announced his intention to refer the matter to the Council of the EU and the Court of Justice of the European Union. As a resident of Brussels, he is particularly affected by these sanctions, which effectively expel him from society.

    Switzerland, which generally aligns its sanctions with those of the EU for economic and financial measures directly related to the invasion of Ukraine, has not adopted the specific regime relating to “hybrid threats,” according to the EU’s Kafkaesque jargon. The State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) has confirmed that Switzerland does not apply sanctions targeting disinformation and propaganda, as they undermine freedom of expression, which is less negotiable in Switzerland than in Brussels.

    It is important to emphasize that Mr. Baud’s civil death sentence was handed down on a purely administrative basis, without any respect for the rights of the defense.

    The procedure for this type of sanction targeting ‘disinformation’ is based entirely on and requires a proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kaja Kallas, followed by adoption by the Council of the European Union (in this case, decision CFSP 2025/2572 of December 15, 2025).

    Baud is civilly dead in Europe because Ms. Kaja Kallas does not like his ideas.

    It should be noted that Mr. Baud is not accused of any illegal act, only of spreading ideas and opinions that Ms. Kallas finds disagreeable. This is a complete denial of the rule of law and freedom of expression, transforming politics into a court of ideas. It is France in 1793: “We do not negotiate! We kill!”

    In reality, Ms. Kallas is behaving like a hysterical person in the strict Freudian sense: someone who is unable to manage her unacknowledged hatreds and expresses them in delirious outbursts.

    If Europe wants to survive, Kallas must go.

    Click on the link for the source… https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/through-her-stupidity-fanaticism-kaja-kallas-is-threatening/

  • Vaccines – The other side of the vaccine story that ‘YOU’ were never told in detail, but where you need to know for your future and that of your children Aand Loved ones detailed in the following few videos…its your health and you have a need to know…

    https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/videos/vaxxed-2/

    https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/videos/vaxxed-3-or-authorized-to-kill-movie/

    DUTY TO DISOBEY – CHD MIL Documentary Trailer

    Just six videos that shows that our western governments have never told the whole story and very little of the true story that harms us and our families…will things change, only the people can make that happen as most western nations are now captured by the Davos Globalist threat to humanity…only the USA, Hungary, Slovakia and Italy are free of THEIR harm currently…

  • New Peer-Reviewed Report Exposes Flaws in Danish Study Claiming Aluminum in Vaccines Is Safe

    Blogger Comment: This article is a reposted report and derives no financial benefit in doing so, but us exhibited solely to inform the public and how Big Pharma manipulate their findings to distort the actual true facts in their mission to produce massive profits and not to keep the public safe or free from vaccine harm and to keep selling their so-called vaccines to do good…but again, do NOT apparently provide this in this case and all others and research studies that have been undertaken by non-associated scientists to Big Pharma…and that’s the great difference with Big Pharma research studies, as they never compare when their sponsored/paid scientists undertake such studies…I wonder why, but you may have a plausible reason…?

    .

    This Article was researched and produced by a dozen leading scientists and thought leaders in aluminum toxicology and vaccine injuries, concluded that the Danish study failed to establish the safety of aluminum in vaccines. The authors of the new report called for “independent, rigorous and honest” science on the health impacts of aluminum in vaccines.

    by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.

    A study by Danish researchers who said they found no link between aluminum in vaccines and autism was flawed, according to a new peer-reviewed report.

    The report, by a dozen leading scientists and thought leaders in aluminum toxicology and vaccine injuries, concluded that the Danish study failed to establish the safety of aluminum in vaccines.

    The original study, published July 15, 2025, in Annals of Internal Medicine, lacked understanding of aluminum toxicology, was poorly designed, used statistical adjustments that likely obscured aluminum’s actual impact on children’s health outcomes and failed to adequately disclose potential conflicts of interest, according to the new report.

    “These limitations are sufficiently serious to invalidate the authors’ conclusions,” the report’s lead author and associate professor at École Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort, Guillemette Crépeaux, Ph.D., told The Defender.

    Despite the study’s weaknesses, the Danish researchers lauded their work as evidence of vaccine safety. The day before the study was published, lead author Anders Hviid, a professor and department head of epidemiology at the Statens Serum Institut, told MedPage Today, the results “provide robust evidence supporting the safety of childhood vaccines.”

    Mainstream media, including NBC News and STAT, promoted the study as proof that aluminum in vaccines is not tied to increased risk of chronic diseases in kids, including autism and asthma.

    But journalist Jeremy R. Hammond, one of the authors of the new report, said:

    “We are constantly told by the government, mainstream media and medical establishment that science has conclusively proven that vaccines are ‘safe and effective’ and do not contribute to the development of chronic childhood diseases and disorders, including autism.

    “Yet, when looking more deeply into that body of literature … we can see that the hypothesis has never actually been tested, and how studies can be effectively designed to find no association.”

    The new report, “Aluminium adjuvants and childhood health: a call for science,” was published on Dec. 25, 2025, in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology.

    In addition to Crépeaux and Hammond, authors include Christopher Exley, Ph.D., one of the world’s leading experts on the health effects of aluminum exposure; Brian Hooker, Ph.D.Children’s Health Defense (CHD) chief scientific officer; Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., CHD senior research scientist; James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D.Christopher A. Shaw, Ph.D.; Jonathan B. Handley; Lluís Luján, DVM, Ph.D.Marika Nosten-Bertrand, Ph.D.Yehuda Shoenfeld, M.D., Ph.D.; and Lucija Tomljenovic, Ph.D.

    Authors of new report call for independent, ‘honest’ science

    The Danish researchers examined national vaccination records of about 1.2 million children born in Denmark between 1997 and 2018, and tracked the rates of 50 chronic health conditions.

    Using statistical analyses, the researchers concluded there was no link between aluminum content in vaccines and increased risk of developing any of the conditions.

    Aluminum-containing adjuvants are used in many vaccines to create a stronger immune response in the person receiving the shot, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

    Vaccines containing aluminum adjuvants include DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis), hepatitis A, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), HPV and pneumococcal.

    The authors of the new report that criticized the Danish study called for “independent, rigorous and honest” science on the health impacts of aluminum in vaccines.

    “That such a limited and internally inconsistent study was not only published in a high-impact medical journal, but also presented as reassurance in media coverage, raises uncomfortable questions,” they wrote.

    Criticism continues after journal refuses to retract study

    The new report is the latest to push back against the controversial Danish study.

    As soon as the study was published, critics, including Exley, began posting criticisms on the study’s webpage.

    Calls for retraction grew after the Annals of Internal Medicine on July 17, 2025, uploaded corrected supplementary materials, stating that the journal’s editors had “included an incorrect version of the Supplementary Material at the time of initial publication.”

    The corrected data clearly indicated a link between aluminum in vaccines and autism, according to CHD scientists who reviewed the study and the corrected data.

    On Aug. 1, 2025, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. called for the article’s retraction in an op-ed published in Trial Site News. Kennedy outlined at least 10 “fatal deficiencies.”

    Hviid responded with his own op-ed, which included a bullet-point list of the methodological issues Kennedy raised, but without refuting any of them.

    On Aug. 11, 2025, Annals of Internal Medicine refused to retract the article.

    “Since neither authors, reviewers, nor journal would rescind or retract the Danish aluminum study, a review article highlighting its flaws and false claims is prudent scientific discourse,” said Jablonowski.

    ‘No one who was seriously curious about harm would have designed a study this way’

    The Danish study authors failed to use a control group of children who weren’t exposed to vaccine-based aluminum. Instead, they compared kids exposed to high levels of aluminum with kids exposed to a little less aluminum.

    “This is an excellent way to ‘not’ find an effect,” Hooker said.

    The study also never actually measured the amount of aluminum the children received. Instead, the researchers relied on manufacturer reports of how much aluminum the vaccines contained, even though published research showed inconsistency between vaccine batches.

    The authors also didn’t measure the child’s body weight at the time of vaccination.

    “You cannot declare a substance safe when you never measured actual exposure,” Lyons-Weiler said. “If you don’t know how much aluminum a child received, when they received it, or relative to body weight and neurodevelopmental timing, then every risk estimate that follows is numerology, not science.

    The Danish researchers also removed kids from the study who died before age 2 or received an unusually high number of vaccines. “No one who was seriously curious about harm would have designed a study this way,” Jablonowski said.

    Given that the children most likely to have been harmed were removed from the study, the study authors unsurprisingly concluded that aluminum didn’t increase kids’ risk of chronic disease but rather was beneficial to kids’ health.

    “So, if their findings are to be believed, injecting infants with a known neurotoxin protects them from chronic symptoms known to be associated with aluminum toxicity,” Hammond said.

    However, it’s biologically implausible that aluminum would benefit kids’ health, the authors of the new report said. “These unlikely benefits seriously challenge the validity of the whole study and its conclusions.”

    ‘Our children need aluminum adjuvants to be removed from vaccines without delay’

    The study’s statistical analyses also assumed a linear dose-response relationship, meaning that if aluminum is harmful, more aluminum would be linked to a greater prevalence of chronic disease.

    Yet prior research on aluminum has shown non-linear effects, meaning very small doses can still have negative effects, the report said.

    The report authors also said the Danish study authors had potential conflicts of interest that may have skewed their research. They wrote:

    “Several authors are affiliated with the Statens Serum Institut, a national entity involved in vaccine production. One of the authors reported affiliations to VAC4EU, a European vaccine surveillance consortium, and funding from Novo Nordisk Fonden and Lundbeckfonden, both closely linked to Danish health policy and biomedical interests.

    “The Novo Nordisk Foundation, through its wholly owned subsidiary Novo Holdings A/S, maintains a controlling interest in Novo Nordisk A/S, the largest pharmaceutical company in Denmark.”

    Crépeaux, who serves as a reviewer for other journals seeking to publish research on aluminum, said she’s seeing an increase in articles that claim aluminum in vaccines is safe.

    These studies overlook the fact that the toxicity of aluminum adjuvants has been “extensively documented,” she said. “Our children need aluminum adjuvants to be removed from vaccines without delay.”Related articles in The Defender

    Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.

    Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.

    Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D., is a senior reporter for The Defender based in Fairfield, Iowa.

    Click on the link for the source of the article… https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/new-report-flaws-danish-study-claiming-aluminum-vaccine-safety/?utm_source=cc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20260106