World Freedom

Blogger Comment: The massive increase in excess deaths and in the significant increase in new birth deaths (in or outside the Womb)  in American and all western nations (China was far less significant), should have alerted the Biden Administration and all western governments to look into what is happening, but for some very strange reason this time, none of them have investigated the cause of these millions of deaths throughout all western nations.

America’s birth rate has just plunged to its lowest level in over four decades, according to the latest figures.

The U.S. birth rate is currently sitting far below the “replacement rate” which is required to keep the population at a sustainable level.

According to the data, published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), fewer babies were born in America in 2023 than in any year since 1979.

The data was revealed in a new report from the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics.

There were 3.59 million babies born in 2023, down 2% from 3.66 million recorded in 2022.

This number is the lowest since 1979 when 3.4 million babies were born.

Karen Benjamin Guzzo, director of the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, told The Wall Street Journal that fewer Americans want to have children while many are delaying starting a family.

“People are making rather reasoned decisions about whether or not to have a child at all,” Guzzo said.

“More often than not, I think what they’re deciding is, ‘Yes, I’d like to have children, but not yet.’”

This number is the lowest since 1979 when 3.4 million babies were born.

Karen Benjamin Guzzo, director of the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, told The Wall Street Journal that fewer Americans want to have children while many are delaying starting a family.

“People are making rather reasoned decisions about whether or not to have a child at all,” Guzzo said.

“More often than not, I think what they’re deciding is, ‘Yes, I’d like to have children, but not yet.’”America’s declining total fertility rate peaked at 3.75 births per woman after World War II and has since collapsed to about 1.617, well below the replacement rate of 2.1.

A nation without children is a nation without a future.

Meanwhile, deaths are continuing to rise as births fall.

The intersection of deaths exceeding births per year appears imminent.

A nation without children is a nation without a future.

Meanwhile, deaths are continuing to rise as births fall.

The intersection of deaths exceeding births per year appears imminent.

America’s birth rates for most age groups are all declining, except for women ages 35-39 and 40-44.

Only the Hispanic fertility rate has rebounded.

The total birth rate has been well under the level of replacement since 2007.

Elon Musk has been warning the public about the threat posed to humanity by plunging birth rates around the world.

In a recent interview posted on X, Musk explains:

“There are certainly some big risks that humanity faces.

“Population collapse is a really big deal, but I wish more people would think about…the birth rate is far below what’s needed to sustain civilization at its current level.”

Earlier this month, Musk wrote in a post on X:

“Any nation with a birth rate below replacement will eventually cease to exist.”

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?creatorScreenName=Slay_News_&dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=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%3D%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1779903587276964126&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fslaynews.com%2Fnews%2Fus-birth-rate-plunges-below-sustainable-level%2F&sessionId=b2e85099aa78ccb988c8f98a7957586693dcb018&siteScreenName=Slay_News_&theme=light&widgetsVersion=2615f7e52b7e0%3A1702314776716&width=500px

Follow the Link for the Article… U.S Birth Rate Plunges Below Sustainable Level

And, READ MORE – WEF: Depopulation Will ‘Save Elites’ & ‘Drown the Rest’

And last but the most potent prediction that was in 2017, 

“Why is the influential military arms data firm The Deagel corporation, a minor branch of US military intelligence and one of the many secretive organizations stating that in 2025 there will be a massive decline in populations of every western nation?” – note that Deagel took this web listing prediction down sometime in 2020, but the “Wayback Machine” has still got it…

https://nobulart.com/deagel-2025-forecast

The biggest in the predicted drop in 2017 within Western Nations is the UK (from a population of 65,650,000 in 2017 to a mere 14,517,860 in  2025) followed by the USA (from a population of 326,620,000 in 2017 to a mere  99,553,100 in  2025). These figures seem absolutely mad, but the nearer we get to 2025, things do appear to be accelerating in the alternative Media arena (that is censored, but you can see the other side of the story that we are not told). Therefore immigration does have a purpose therefore if and when these prediction become the truth instead of conspiracies, which basically “Deagel” is not really into as a ‘leading’ military analysist who is in the “intelligence know” working for for the US government (on paper anyway, but ultimately controlled by the Globalists)…and their “2030 Great Reset” 

And,
Leaked Pfizer Docs Expose Plan to Depopulate Earth by 2025

One of the leaders of the World Economic Forum (WEF) has declared that nations with “shrinking populations” are the “big winners” because globalists are pushing to “substitute humans with machines.”

The comments were made by BlackRock CEO Larry Fink during the WEF’s annual summit in Saudi Arabia earlier this week.

Fink also serves on the board of directors at the WEF and is listed as one of the organization’s “agenda contributors.”

As chairman and chief executive of BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, Fink has $10 trillion in global assets under management.

During the WEF’s summit in Riyadh, Fink assured attendees that collapsing populations in nations around the world will not be a problem for the global elite.

In fact, Fink gloated that the collapse of civilization would be an advantage for those “big winners” who have  been “substituting humans” with “machines.”

Fink continues by bluntly declaring that the goal of the globalists is the maximum destruction of the planet’s population.

“I can argue that in developed countries, countries with declining populations will benefit,” Fink said during the WEF panel discussion.

“The big winners are those with shrinking populations.

“That’s something that most people never talked about,” he admitted while saying the quiet part out loud.

“You know, we always used to think a shrinking population is a cause for negative growth.

“But in my conversations with the leadership of these large developed countries, which have xenophobic immigration policies – they do not allow anyone to come – and shrinking demographics, these countries will rapidly develop robotics, AI [artificial intelligence], and technology.

“If the promise of all that transforms productivity, which most of us think it will, we will be able to elevate the standard of living of countries and the standard of living of individuals, even with shrinking populations.

“So the paradigm of negative population growth is going to be changing.

“And, the social problems that one will have when substituting humans for machines is going to be far easier in those countries that have declining populations.”

WATCH: Link to Fink’s Conference Speech https://rumble.com/v4tj3i0-wef-big-winners-reduce-populations-substitute-humans-with-machines.html

Larry Fink Explains the Real Goal of Depopulation is to Make it Easier to Substitute Humans With AI

The comments from Fink come amid growing calls from WEF members to depopulate Earth.

However, the statement from Fink is the first time a WEF member has openly gloated about the economic benefits of population reduction.

In past calls for depopulation, WEF members usually justify the anti-human agenda by claiming it’s necessary to “save the planet” from “climate change.”

During a recent WEF summit, one globalist speaker argued that there are too many “souls on the planet” to stop “global warming,” as Slay News reported.

Sadhguru, a WEF agenda contributor, announced the plans during a meeting with world leaders and global elites.

Globalists praised Sadhguru for his “frankness” when he boasted to world leaders and corporate elites about the depopulation agenda.

WEF members reportedly expressed “relief” when Sadhguru openly stated that the global population of humans needs to be reduced.

Sadhguru said, “They asked me a brilliant question: ‘How do you reduce the human footprint?’

“I said, ‘You have to reduce the number of feet.’”

“All the religious groups are against me because I’m talking about population,” Sadhguru noted.

“They want more souls – I want less [sic] on the planet.”

As Slay News previously reported, a celebrated member of the WEF has called for a staggering 86 percent reduction in the population of humans, arguing that the goal can be achieved “peacefully.”

The call was made by Dennis Meadows, one of the main authors of the Club of Rome’s 1972 pro-depopulation book “The Limits to Growth.”

Meadows is considered an architect of the WEF’s agenda with his theories on population numbers being central to the organization’s anti-human agenda.

Meadows argues that most of the world’s population must be wiped out so that the survivors can “have freedom” and a “high standard of living.”

During a 2017 interview, Meadows claimed that genocide of 86% of the world’s population is “inevitable.”

However, he insists that a “benevolent” dictatorship could accomplish the mass de-population “peacefully.”

“We want to have freedom and we want to have a high standard of living so we’re going to have a billion people.”

He then warned that “we have to get back down” to just one billion people on earth.

More recently, another WEF member upped the ante by calling for more than a 90 percent reduction in humans, as Slay News reported.

English primatologist and anthropologist Jane Goodall, who the WEF lists as one of its “agenda contributors,” pushed the shocking suggestion for meeting the globalist organization’s “Net Zero” targets.

Goodhall told her fellow globalists that they could “save the planet” from the “climate crisis” if the Earth’s population was over 90 percent smaller than it is today.

Goodall argues that all of the WEF’s “problems” would be solved if fewer humans were walking the Earth.

She made the statement during a panel discussion at the organization’s annual summit in Davos, Switzerland.

“We cannot hide away from human population growth,” she told frustrated elites while discussing plans for achieving “Net Zero.”

“Because it underlies so many of the other problems,” she continued.

“All of these problems that we talk about wouldn’t be a problem if there was the size of the population that it was 500 years ago.”

As of May 2024, Earth’s human population is estimated to be 8.1 billion people.

500 years ago, as Goodall, a renowned anthropologist, would know, the population of humans was approximately 435 million.

To satisfy Goodall’s suggestion to solve globalists’ “problems,” 94.6% of humanity would need to go.

READ MORE – Renowned Scientist: All Covid-Vaxxed ‘Will Die in 3 to 5 Years’

A peer-reviewed study has just been published in a prestigious medical journal that warns of the “fatal consequences” of taking Covid mRNA injections.

The peer-reviewed study was published in the world-renowned journal Nature.

The study identifies serious problems with mRNA (modRNA) “vaccine” technology and the “fatal consequences” of being injected with the shots.

However, shortly after it was published, the bombshell study was pulled down and hidden from the public.

Biomedical scientist Dr. Lidiya Angelova, who was able to analyze the non-public study, says the reason this study was hidden might have to do with the fact that its contents are enraging and paint mRNA manufacturers (i.e., Pfizer, Moderna, and BioNTech) in a negative light.

“Is this because there is something in it that may enrage people and make them want to hold those responsible accountable?” Angelova asked after looking at the study, adding that there is “no data to two major issues that could have fatal consequences.”

“COVID vaccines never should have been given to humans,” she further stated.

Angelova says there are “strategies” that people who have taken mRNA injections can use to try to cleanse their bodies of “drug and vaccine toxicity.”

That toxicity, by the way, can include immune disruption (i.e., autoimmunity), nanoparticle reactions, chronic inflammation, cytokine storm, and hypersensitivity.

The article itself, from what we can see, also clearly states that the “clinical use of mRNA in vaccines and drugs is relatively new, which raises important safety concerns that need to be addressed.”

Barack Obama recently appeared at the Stanford Cyber Policy Center to speak about what he sees as the successful implementation of the mass public vaccination agenda.

The Covid vaccine rollout resulted in roughly 70 percent of the world’s population having received at least one mRNA injection.

“We’ve now, essentially, clinically tested the vaccine on billions of people worldwide,” Obama said.

Obama admitted that the mass vaccination plot was basically a forced clinical trial of untested, experimental drugs.

One particular area of research that was never even considered before mRNA shots were unleashed is LNP (lipid nanoparticle) mRNA toxicity.

LNP-mRNA is now being identified as something that causes hypersensitivity reactions, or HSRs, which can manifest as:

• Anaphylaxis

• Myocarditis

• Throat swelling

• Respiratory failure

• Hemodynamic changes

PEGylated lipid is said to be the most potentially reactogenic component of LNP-mRNA.

It turns out that only 1-2 percent of LNP-mRNA actually enters the cells.

The remaining 98 percent is overlooked, spreading throughout the body, particularly in the liver, as an allergenic substance.

LNP-mRNA accumulates in the liver, and it remains unknown how long it takes to break down and be released from the body.

As it sits there, the worry is that it continues to produce toxic byproducts such as aldehydes that produce even more negative effects.

“The LNP-mRNA has many unknown effects on the body,” warns The Exposé (United Kingdom), citing Angelova’s work.

“COVID-19 vaccines should never be given to humans, as has been known since the technology’s initial tests.”

“It’s time for another Nuremberg trial to begin,” wrote someone in the comments about how those who contributed to the unleashing of toxic mRNA injections, such as Bill Gates and Fauci, need to be held liable for their crimes against humanity.

“And a real one this time,” responded another, “not the ‘Paperclip’ fraud version.”

mRNA never should have been released, but greed and bloodlust speak louder than reason.

Follow the Link for the Article… Top Study Exposes ‘Fatal Consequences’ of Covid Shots

The damning new study has uncovered troubling evidence showing that Covid mRNA shots cause long-term kidney failure and renal damage.

The heart-related dangers of COVID-19 vaccines are very well-known at this point.

However, new impacts of the injections are continuing to emerge that are being widely ignored by the corporate media.

According to Dr. Peter A. McCullough, an epidemiologist, cardiologist, and internist, a worrying number of kidney and renal effects are being reported in connection with the vaccine.

McCullough fears that it may be overlooked to the point where these problems are not discovered in patients until it is too late to intervene.

He notes that kidneys receive a quarter of all cardiac output and filter blood on a regular basis.

With studies showing that around half of vaccinated individuals have detectable levels of the COVID-19 vaccine spike protein in their bloodstream, it is not a stretch to posit that the spike protein and mRNA could end up settling within the kidneys and causing an expression of the spike protein there.

A scientific review outlined 28 published mechanisms of renal damage and kidney injury stemming from the jabs, with most pathways related to inflammation from autoimmunity or direct cytokine damage.

This dovetails with a paper that was published on a preprint server last year by scientists from the New Zealand Ministry of Health that showed the vaccine causes kidney injury.

Interestingly, the paper somehow managed to “disappear” from the preprint server before popping up again later in the year in a peer-reviewed journal with some numbers changed to reframe the jab as safe for kidneys.

In an examination of VAERS database information, Steve Kirsch found that just one vaccine in the database’s 30-year history had a signal for acute kidney injury – and it was indeed the COVID-19 vaccine.

Doctors are too afraid to admit the vaccines cause damage

The problem is that many in the medical establishment are so fearful of admitting that the vaccines can cause any damage that they aren’t giving the possibility the weight it deserves.

After being threatened with losing their license, many physicians are hesitant to even suggest something could be wrong with a patient after getting jabbed.

As a result, people may not be getting the tests and treatments they need.

This is something that Dr. McCullough, who is an expert in complications caused by the COVID-19 vaccine and the virus itself, is worried about.

He said that with so many people experiencing “pressing medical problems” such as blood clots, cardiac arrest, myocarditis, and stroke, renal damage might be discovered when it is too late to treat it.

South Korean researchers who explored new-onset kidney diseases following COVID-19 vaccination expressed a similar sentiment.

They looked at cases of people without a history of kidney-related problems who sought medical care following symptoms that arose after COVID-19 vaccination, such as red urine, acute kidney injury, and decreased renal function.

The study was not controlled, which means they cannot conclusively determine causality.

But they did caution: “However, COVID-19 vaccines are known to cause new-onset or relapsing glomerular diseases due to potent immune dysregulation, and various therapeutic responses have been reported.”

In the conclusion of their study, which was published in the journal Vaccines, they wrote:

“Although we could not confirm causality between vaccinations and these phenomena, in this time of mass vaccination, clinicians need to consider the possibility that vaccines may have provoked kidney diseases in patients who have renal symptoms.”

If healthcare providers aren’t allowed to talk about vaccine side effects, they won’t be able to monitor people or identify the causes of their problems so they can provide effective solutions.

The damage has already been done by forcing untested vaccines on people, but now it’s time to acknowledge the very real adverse effects so doctors can be fully informed and help their patients get the treatment they need without fear of professional repercussions.Follow the Link for the Article… Covid Shots Cause Long-Term Kidney Damage, Study Finds

A bombshell new study has warned that Covid “booster” shots block the body’s natural defense from preventing cancers and other deadly diseases.

The scientists behind the study found that the so-called “boosters” shots were linked to higher levels of IgG4 antibodies.

After receiving the injections, the body’s ability to activate white blood cells becomes impaired.

Due to the overproduction of IgG4 antibodies, the Covid mRNA shots destroy the body’s natural defense against all other infections and various cancers.

Additionally, the evidence shows that booster shots impair the most critical facets of the immune system – the function of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

Dr. Alberto Boretti, the paper’s lead author and scientist, used the Google Scholar database to conduct the review.

Boretti, a research professor of mechanical engineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology, did not find adequate evidence to suggest that repeated booster vaccination in immune-compromised individuals is safe or efficacious, as claimed by health officials.

Instead, Prof. Boretti found evidence showing that Covid mRNA boosters are actively impairing the activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

When it comes to surveilling, responding to, and breaking down pathogens, these T cells are two of the most important facets of the immune system.

These T cells also help the body respond to allergens and tumors.

CD4+ T cells are responsible for activating other immune cells.

They coordinate the immune response against other infections and help B cells create antibodies.

The CD8+ T cells help in the recognition and elimination of infected or abnormal cells.

They also prevent excessive inflammation.

However, when mRNA injections block these cells from functioning, it can have deadly consequences.

The suppression of these T cells exacerbates basic infections and allows tumor growth to persist.

The latest study comes amid a growing body of evidence that reveals devastating health risks associated with the Covid mRNA injections.

Nevertheless, the current CDC guidance urges children ages 6 months and older to receive one or two doses of an “updated” vaccine if they are immune-compromised and received an initial two doses before September 12, 2023.

However, Professor Boretti advises against this:

Boretti warns that the CDC ignores the risks linked to the injections and, instead, relies on unproven data.

“While booster doses have been recommended to enhance and extend immunity, especially in the face of emerging variants, this recommendation is not based on proven efficacy, and the side effects have been neglected,” Boretti warns

During the pandemic. immune-compromised individuals were one of the first groups of people prioritized for the experimental Covid mRNA injections.

Yet, according to multiple studies and medical literature, Covid shots actually harm compromised immune systems even further.

As more boosters are pumped into their blood, their immune system is impaired further.

In turn, this destroys their ability to fight off all infections and forces these individuals into a perpetual state of immune failure.

On one hand, a high level of IgG4 antibodies after vaccination could equate to protection against the target infection.

However, the protective effect of high IgG4 is only realized to a certain level.

A growing body of evidence suggests that high levels of IgG4 antibodies from repeat vaccination cause multi-organ inflammation, autoimmune diseases, rapid onset cancers (“turbo cancers“), and autoimmune myocarditis.

In other words, manipulation of the human immune system is extremely dangerous and should be approached with far more caution.

Meanwhile, vaccination with the nRNA shots creates adverse effects on the blood.

IgG4 antibodies are specific proteins made by specialized white blood cells called B cells.

When these levels are artificially forced to abnormal levels, there will likely be autoimmune issues.

As the activation of white blood cells is suppressed, individuals begin to suffer from turbo cancers and the advancement of severe disease following any infection.

This begs the question: Is this issue specific to mRNA vaccines, or do all vaccines prime the immune system for failure?

What role did the over-vaccination of the population before SARS-CoV-2 play in the exacerbation of severe disease and critical outcomes of COVID-19 during 2020 and 2021?

Moreover, how might the aggressive, compounding vaccination of infants set their immune systems up for failure?

Is the systematic destruction of the body’s T cells behind the new-age cancer epidemic in children and young adults?

Follow the Link for the Article… Covid ‘Boosters’ Block Natural Defense against Cancer, Study Warns

A new peer-reviewed study has confirmed that Covid mRNA “booster” shots are causing heart failure to soar in young adults and teenagers.

The study, published in the world-renowned European Heart Journal on February 15, found that a third dose of the Pfizer or Moderna injections is directly linked to the “increased incidence rate of myocarditis.”

Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle (myocardium), according to the Mayo Clinic.

The inflammation can reduce the heart’s ability to pump blood, leading to blood clots, strokes, cardiac arrest, a potentially death.

Myocarditis is a known side effect of the Covid mRNA vaccines but most people are unaware that they have it, making it a potential ticking timebomb for sufferers.

The vaccine-induced heart injury is believed to be the leading cause of the recent spike in sudden and unexpected deaths.

The researchers said the spikes in myocarditis are more apparent in young adults and adolescents, particularly males.

As Slay News has reported, cases of myocarditis have been skyrocketing around the world since the public rollout of the Covid shots in early 2021.

According to the new study, using data from several Nordic nations, researchers evaluated the risk of myocarditis among 12- to 39-year-olds after receiving COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccination.

The study analyzed data from 8.9 million young adults from four nations: Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.

In total, 1,533 cases of myocarditis were identified, which the researchers noted were all caused by the mRNA boosters.

The study concluded that the “booster dose is associated with increased myocarditis risk in adolescents and young adults.”

Among males, a third dose of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine was associated with an “increased incidence rate of myocarditis” within 28 days of inoculation compared to a longer period after the second dose.

The study noted that the association of myocarditis with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines has appeared “strongest in male adolescents and younger males and after the second dose.”

The study was authored by 12 experts from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Swedish Medical Products Agency, Statens Serum Institut, and the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare.

According to a separate study published in late January, cases of myocarditis among vaccinated individuals in the United States spiked within the first year of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign.

The U.S. study looked at data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

“We found the number of myocarditis reports in VAERS after COVID-19 vaccination in 2021 was 223 times higher than the average of all vaccines combined for the past 30 years,” the U.S. study said.

“This represented a [2,500 percent] increase in the absolute number of reports in the first year of the campaign when comparing historical values prior to 2021.”

Roughly 50 percent of myocarditis cases occurred among youths and 69 percent of affected individuals were males.

Out of a total of 3,078 COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis cases as of August 2023, 76 percent resulted in emergency care and hospitalization, and 3 percent died.

New studies are being published looking at reducing myocarditis risk when vaccinating adolescents against COVID-19,

The mounting studies confirm that the risk of heart failure massively escalates each time a person receives an mRNA injection.

A February 14 study in the journal Vaccines found that extending the interval between the first and the second dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines leads to a 66 percent “lower risk of incident carditis among adolescents.”

Carditis is the general term for inflammation of the heart.

The study referred to adolescents as a “vulnerable population” while pointing out that “previous studies indicate an increased carditis risk among adolescents following the two-dose messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine.”

There have been suggestions that COVID-19 infections cause more myocarditis cases than the vaccines.

However, multiple experts and major studies have disputed these claims.

Among those disputing the claim that COVID-19 infections cause myocarditis is world-renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough.

In a post on his website, he described this argument as “a twisted rationale for giving out COVID-19 vaccines, and in a perverted manner, creating more myocarditis in the population.

“If SARS-CoV-2 infection caused myocarditis or inflammation of heart muscle tissue, then it would be seen on autopsy in fatal cases of COVID-19.”

Dr. McCullough cited an October 2022 study involving an autopsy of the hearts of COVID-19-infected individuals.

The analysis “concluded the virus does not infect the heart,” he said.

The cardiologist called claims of the COVID-19 virus infecting the heart and causing myocarditis “false claims made from automated hospital data and not adjudicated, autopsy-proven cases.”

“The COVID-19 vaccines install mRNA in the heart and the Spike protein directly damages and incites inflammation into the heart muscle causing the pathophysiology we see every day in cardiology practice,” he wrote.

Researchers from a Jan. 24 U.S. study who looked into the initial phase 3 trials of Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines found that their estimated harms “greatly outweigh the rewards.”

After determining that the injections do more harm than good, they called on world governments to impose a “global” ban on the COVID-19 vaccines “given the well-documented [serious adverse events] and unacceptable harm-to-reward ratio.”

The authors also recommended an “immediate removal” of COVID-19 vaccines from the childhood immunization schedule.

They pointed out that children are at very low risk of infection.

Follow the Link for the Article… Covid ‘Booster’ Shots Cause Heart Failure in Young Adults, Top Study Confirms

New data published by the UK government has revealed that one million Covid mRNA vaccinated citizens have died suddenly in the past year.

Over the past two years, excess deaths in England have soared.

Officials data shows the spike in sudden deaths is almost exclusively among those “fully vaccinated” for COVID-19.

New government data shows that one million fully jabbed people in England have died since the start of 2022.

About one in three English people never received a single COVID injection.

Based on the high number of excess deaths among the remaining two-thirds of English people who received at least one COVID injection, one would expect there to be far more than just 61,000 unvaccinated deaths if COVID jabs really are “safe and effective” as claimed.

The fact that there were only 61,000 unvaccinated deaths compared to one million vaccinated deaths based on the 1:3 ratio of vaccinated versus unvaccinated across English society shows that the fully jabbed are dying at a significantly higher rate than the unvaccinated.

“According to the UK Government department known as the UK Health Agency (UKHSA), by 3rd July 2022, 18.9 million people had refused the first dose of the COVID-19 injection, 21.5 million people had refused the 2nd dose of the COVID-19 injection, alongside 2.6 million people who had received the first dose but refused the second, and 30.4 million people had refused the third dose of the Covid-19 injection alongside 8.9 million people who had received the second dose but refused the third,” a data report explains.

“According to the UKHSA’s figures, 63.4 million people were eligible for vaccination at this point. Therefore, 18.9 million people refused the COVID-19 vaccine in England and remained completely unvaccinated.

“But on top of this, a further 2.6 million refused a second dose, meaning 21.5 million people were not double vaccinated, and 8.9 million people refused a third dose, meaning 30.4 million people were not triple vaccinated.”

As of July 2022, 30 percent of the population of England remained completely unvaccinated.

Another 34 percent are only single-jabbed, while the remainder are double but not triple-jabbed.

Based on all this, the vaccinated population of England accounted for 95 percent of all COVID deaths between January and May 2023.

The unvaccinated population, conversely, accounted for just five percent of all deaths during this time period.

The vast majority of all COVID deaths in England, around 80 percent, are occurring among the quadruple-vaccinated.

The quadruple-vaccinated also account for 83 percent of all COVID deaths among those who received at least one COVID injection.

Ever since July 2021 at the height of Operation Warp Speed, the vaccinated have far surpassed the unvaccinated in terms of death – and this is true among every age group.

This is despite the fact that 30 percent of the English population never took a single COVID jab.

Between July 2021 and May 2023, a whopping 94 percent of all deaths in England occurred in people who were COVID jabbed at least one.

Conversely, just six percent of all deaths during that same time period occurred in the unvaccinated.

“This more suggests that the Covid-19 injections are deadly, and prove that they are killing people,” reported The Exposé.

“And we can be certain that COVID-19 Vaccination greatly increases mortality.

“So when will the Government discontinue their use?”

“This is a pandemic of the vaccinated,” someone commented, adding to the conversation.

“It would be funny if it were not so sinister an agenda.”

Follow the Link for the Article… 1 Million Vaccinated Brits Died Suddenly in Past Year, Government Admits

Added to Blog on 24 December 2023
DEATHS AFTER RECEIVING THE MRNA COVID-19 JAB
Record-level data showing vaccine timing and death date. There is no confusion any longer: the vaccines are unsafe and have killed, on average, around 1 person per 1,000 doses   https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/12/no_author/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new-zealand-ministry-of-health/ 
MAIN Medicare Data for 5 Nations for Deaths after Covid Vaccination for 

USA, 

New Zealand, 

Israel, 

UK, 

Maldives
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/medicare-death-data-proves-the-covid
The Devastating Data From US Medicare and the New Zealand Ministry of Health

A new study has found that COVID-19 mRNA injections are behind so-called “long Covid.”

In a new paper, scientists behind the study reveal that spike protein has been detected in the bloodstream of people suffering from long Covid.

According to the scientists, the spike protein was found up to two months after Covid mRNA vaccination.

The discovery suggests that spike protein may persist in the body much longer than previously predicted and does not remain at the injection site as claimed by pharmaceutical companies and health officials.

The findings also dispute previous claims that long Covid was caused by the virus as it now appears to be a reaction to the mRNA injections.

The study was published on December 27 in the renowned European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences.

The scientists found vaccine spike protein in two patients at least two months after receiving their second dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.

They also discovered viral spike protein in one subject who previously recovered from infection in a cohort of 81 patients with long Covid syndrome.

Samples gathered from the unvaccinated control group were negative for spike protein.

“This study, in agreement with other published investigations, demonstrates that both natural and vaccine spike protein may still be present in long Covid patients, thus supporting the existence of a possible mechanism that causes the persistence of spike protein in the human body for much longer than predicted by early studies,” the authors wrote.

U.S. regulatory agencies claim vaccinating against COVID-19 can reduce the risk of developing long Covid.

However, research suggests the condition may be caused by an immune overreaction to the spike protein in COVID-19 vaccines used to induce antibodies.

In a February 2023 study published in the Journal of Medical Virology, researchers examined the levels of spike protein and viral RNA circulating in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with and without long Covid.

They found that spike protein and viral RNA were more likely to be present in patients with long Covid.

In patients with long Covid, 30 percent were positive for both spike protein and viral RNA.

None of the individuals without long Covid were positive for both.

When COVID-19 vaccines were first authorized, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said the spike protein produced by the body after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine is a “harmless piece of spike protein.”

Furthermore, the agency stated that spike protein didn’t “last long in the body” and breaks down within a few weeks like other proteins.

The Infectious Diseases Society of America, a resource center funded partly through a cooperative agreement with the CDC, estimated that the spike proteins generated by COVID-19 vaccines only last up to a few weeks in the body.

An early Pfizer biodistribution study showed that the Covid spike protein gets into the blood after vaccination.

Once in the bloodstream, it circulates for several days before accumulating in organs and tissues, including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands, and in high concentrations in the ovaries.

In this study, researchers found vaccine mRNA was present from the day of vaccination and persisted in the bloodstream for weeks after vaccination.

In an August 2023 paper published in Biomedicines, researchers found the design of the Covid mRNA vaccines allows uncontrolled biodistribution, durability, and persistent bioavailability of the spike protein inside the body after vaccination.

This presence of the spike protein could potentially damage tissues and cause disease.

The study group included 20 subjects who received two doses of a Covid mRNA vaccine, 20 who were unvaccinated and tested negative for COVID-19 or antibodies indicating they had previously been infected, and a control group of 20 unvaccinated participants who tested positive for the virus.

Researchers detected specific fragments of spike protein in about 50 percent of subjects who received mRNA vaccines 69 to 187 days following vaccination.

All samples from the unvaccinated control group were negative, including the 20 individuals who had tested positive after contracting COVID-19.

In a January 2023 study published in the Journal of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, researchers found full-length or traces of SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA in some patient samples up to 28 days after Covid vaccination.

This discovery indicates a prolonged production of spike protein and the potential for a “continuous immune response in some persons.”

A study published in March 2022 in Cell found vaccine mRNA in lymph nodes on days 7, 16, and 37 following vaccination.

Immunohistochemical staining for spike antigen in mRNA-vaccinated patient lipid nanoparticles in some individuals showed spike protein antigen was still present as late as 60 days following the second vaccine dose.

A November 2021 study in The Journal of Immunology found exosomes expressing spike protein 14 days after vaccination with Covid mRNA injections.

Levels of spike protein also increased following booster doses.

The rising levels after boosters suggest the amount of spike protein in the body increases with subsequent injections.

A 2021 study in Clinical Infectious Diseases led by researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the Harvard Medical School found circulating SARS-CoV-2 proteins in the plasma of participants vaccinated with Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine.

Spike protein was detected in blood plasma as early as one day following the first vaccine dose.

Follow the Link for the Article… ‘Long Covid’ Caused by mRNA Injections, Scientists Warn

READ MORE: Bill Gates Insider Warns of Massive Population Plunge in ‘Highly Vaccinated Countries’

When the United Nations climate summit drew to its close in mid-December, globalist governments around the world were pledging billions of dollars in taxpayer money to fight the so-called “climate crisis.”

Democrat President Joe Biden’s administration joined other Western governments in pledging billions for climate “reparations” and a “Green Climate Fund.”

The green agenda schemes are aimed at bringing regimes ruling poorer countries to heel.

Self-proclaimed world leaders say that is just the start, however.

Global taxes and “trillions” in funding will ultimately be demanded.

The latest wealth-redistribution schemes come as voters and taxpayers in nations such as Argentina and Holland, among others, increasingly reject the parties, politicians, and policies behind them.

Meanwhile, recent polls show most American adults reject the man-made “climate change” hypothesis.

This put U.S. officials in an awkward position at this climate summit in the major oil-producing nation of Dubai.

Right at the start, Western governments and Japan pledged large sums for what is being portrayed as climate “reparations.”

Dubbed the “loss and damage” fund by the United Nations and its members, the narrative behind it holds that since freer Western peoples developed first, they have put more CO2 into the atmosphere, and therefore must pay Third World governments who misrule poverty-stricken populations for the alleged harm caused.

All of this is based on the dubious hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), known to scientists as the “gas of life,” are “pollution.”

These “carbon emissions” must be reduced to prevent alleged man-made “climate change” and meet the “Net Zero” targets of the World Economic Forum (WEF).

CO2 makes up about 0.04 percent of the atmosphere, with human emissions of the gas — including exhalation — making up just a fraction of that.

The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) claims that reducing this trace gas exhaled by all human beings will prevent “climate change.”

But to compensate alleged victims for the “climate changes” that have already resulted and will still supposedly come from Western CO2 emissions over the last century, this “loss and damage” fund was agreed to in principle at last year’s UN climate summit in Egypt.

With no trial and no jury, Biden and his “climate czar” John Kerry pleaded guilty on behalf of the United States a year ago.

Other Western governments did as well.

This year, the sentencing has been taking place in Dubai.

On the very first day of the 28th Conference of the Parties (COP28) in Dubai, governments began making pledges on behalf of their taxpayers.

The German government pledged $100 million.

The Biden administration pledged $17.5 million to the reparations fund.

The unelected leaders of the European Union (EU) vowed to offer 200 million euros in taxpayer money.

But Third World regimes are demanding at least $100 billion per year just for this new fund.

They claim the cash is needed for what they call “climate justice.”

The fund, which will be housed at the World Bank for now as policymakers try to find a permanent home for it, is separate from the infamous “Green” climate slush fund.

That fund, which has been in existence for years, is being used to bribe Third World governments into keeping their people in poverty by prohibiting abundant energy and restricting resource development.

Biden and Obama have funneled billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars into that one already, in flagrant defiance of federal law.

This comes as Communist China continues increasing its gargantuan CO2 footprint as it ramps up fossil fuel burning to support its growing economy.

“Climate” activists funded by the Kremlin, European taxpayers, and the Rockefeller oil dynasty — infamous for funding racial eugenics and population control — celebrated the “loss and damage” developments.

“The responsibility now lies with affluent nations to meet their financial obligations in a manner proportionate to their role in the climate crisis,” Climate Action Network (CAN) “head of global political strategy” Harjeet Singh was quoted as saying in media reports about the development.

At the 2019 UN climate summit in Madrid, the largest financier of CAN was the Sea Change Foundation, according to the Heartland Institute.

Congressional investigations revealed that the Sea Change Foundation had received almost $25 million from a shell corporation in Bermuda known as “Klein Ltd.”

The corporation is controlled by Putin’s cronies and Russian energy interests.

The Biden administration is already pledging some $3 billion of additional U.S. taxpayer dollars for the “Green” slush fund.

That figure is in addition to $10 billion pledged for the fund by European governments and the Japanese government.

But even all that is just the tip of the iceberg of what the Biden administration has planned to “save the planet” from the “climate crisis.”

“Since day one, President Biden, Vice President [Kamala] Harris, and the entire Biden-Harris Administration have treated climate change as the existential threat of our time,” the White House said in an announcement.

“After spearheading the most significant climate action in history at home and leading efforts to tackle the climate crisis abroad, the United States heads into the 28th U.N. Climate Change Conference (COP28) in Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE) with unprecedented momentum.”

Top officials are making clear that this is just the start of the planetary wealth redistribution.

International Monetary Fund boss Kristalina Georgieva called for governments to impose a global “carbon tax” on humanity, as Slay News reported.

“We are very keen to give the biggest possible incentive for decarbonization, which is putting a price on carbon,” the Bulgarian IMF chief said at the UN summit.

“That price needs to go up, up, up if we are to speed up decarbonization.”

Another supposed benefit of “carbon taxes” (really CO2 taxes) would be raising even more money for the government, declared Georgieva.

“We are a huge proponent of carbon price,” added the IMF bigwig, whose institution has long been groomed to eventually serve as a global central bank.

In addition to “creating liquidity” by issuing “Special Drawing Rights” (SDRs) out of thin air and handing them to member governments, the IMF is also building a globally interoperable system for central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

Leading WEF luminaries have repeatedly expressed hope that digital cash will be used to track and control every individual’s “carbon footprint.”

Journalist Leo Hohmann slammed the IMF chief’s comments.

“Georgieva is a globalist elitist sitting there at COP28 under the banner of the IMF and World Bank, admitting in the wide open that what the globalists want is a global tax that punishes people for driving gas-powered cars, heating their homes, cooking on gas ranges, eating meat, flying on planes, etc.,” he said.

“These are all things that your typical middle-class family sees not as luxuries but as everyday necessities.

“If the globalists get their way, only the rich will be able to afford these things.

“The rest of us will be left to fend for ourselves in cold, dank little apartments, riding our bicycles to work, or catching the bus, while coming home to a dinner of meal worms and crickets. No thanks.”

As Slay News reported, Britain’s King Charles III, who flew to the event in a private jet despite serving as one of the world’s leading climate bullies, demanded at least $5 trillion per year to supposedly stave off a climate crisis.

“How can we bring together our public, private, philanthropic and NGO [nongovernmental organization] sectors ever more effectively, so that they all play their part in delivering climate action?” he asked, warning of “dangerous, uncharted territory” ahead.

Tax money will be key, but the private sector will also be coerced into forking over ever greater sums.

“With the private sector firmly at the table … we could mobilize the trillions of dollars we need, in the order of four-and-a-half to 5 trillion a year, to drive the transformation we need,” the British monarch declared, without specifying who would pay, how they would be forced to pay, or where exactly the gargantuan sums of money would be going.

Estimates suggest the British royal family is worth almost $30 billion, but Charles did not pledge any of that at the summit.

Climate skeptics across the Western world in particular have been slamming the whole UN process as a fraud.

Just this week, U.S. Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) introduced a bill to defund and expel the UN itself.

And around the world, political leaders who reject the “climate” agenda have been performing well in polls.

Most Americans and most Republicans in Congress reject even the man-made “climate change” hypothesis underpinning the whole edifice.

Even establishment voices have been sounding the alarm.

Speaking about the climate summit on Fox News, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said the “whole thing” was merely “an elite ripoff of everyday workers.”

“When John Kerry talks about giving away money, guess what? That’s your money,” declared Gingrich.

“Kerry is cheerful about taking money from you to give to these people he’s never met, who will then, by the way, mostly squander it.…

“It’s an absurdity. And historians will someday look back and say, how could they have been so stupid for so long?”

Whether House GOP lawmakers will provide taxpayer funding for all of the pledges and promises Biden and Kerry are making remains to be seen.

But what is clear is that the public’s tolerance of such schemes is wearing thin.

Only about a third of Americans said in polls that they would be willing to pay even $1 extra per month on their energy bill to fight “climate change.”

Follow the Link for the Article… Biden Pushing ‘Wealth Redistribution’ to ‘Fight Climate Change’

Republicans are raising the alarm about the billions of dollars in taxpayer money that Democrat President Joe Biden is pumping into his so-called “Climate Corps.”

House Republican has responded to Biden’s $30 billion green agenda plan by introducing a bill that targets the scheme.

If Biden’s initiative succeeds, the Climate Corps will train 20,000 young people “for jobs in the clean energy economy,” according to the White House.

These jobs will be focused on “advancing environmental justice, deploying clean energy, implementing energy-efficient technologies, and tackling climate change.”

However, Republicans have slammed Biden’s initiative as an attempt to deploy a “climate army.”

Rep. Bob Good (R-VA) introduced a bill to tackle Biden’s plan called the “No American Climate Corps Act.”

Good warns that the “Climate Corps” is just another example of the Biden administration “furthering its radical anti-American energy agenda.”

In a statement, Good said:

“Americans are struggling to make ends meet because of Bidenomics.

“Instead of recognizing that family budgets are already stretched thin by sky-high energy prices, President Biden is focused on deploying a climate army that will increase regulatory burdens on business owners and drive inflation across the economy even higher.”

Good is not alone, however.

Many have suggested that Biden’s “climate army” is an attempt to intimidate Americans into going along with his fallacious policies.

According to a one-pager explaining Good’s legislation, the bill “prohibits any federal funds from being used for the purposes of creating an American Climate Corps or a similar program.”

Biden announced his Climate Corps program on September 20, as Slay News reported.

The president launched the effort by signing an order after a group of left-wing politicians urged him to establish the program through executive action.

Democrat and left-wing senators and representatives conveniently joined forces to pressure Biden to sign the executive order.

The effort was led by Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) who was joined by Senators:

• Ron Wyden (D-OR)
• Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
• Martin Heinrich (D-NM)

In the House, the effort was led by Reps.

• Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY)
• Judy Chu (D-CA)
• Joe Neguse (D-CO)

They led 44 of their colleagues in the effort.

Conservatives in Congress, meanwhile, say they believe initiatives like this inflict hyperinflation, increase consumer costs, and deplete American energy capacity.

Good’s one-pager explains the initiative as an “attempt to mimic” President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal.

“President Biden and Democrats’ continued climate change-fueled war on American energy independence will cost over $500 billion in climate spending with the passage of bills like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the CHIPS and Science Act, and the Inflation Acceleration Act,” Good’s one-pager warns.

Follow the Link for the Article… Biden’s ‘Climate Army’ Will Severely Hurt Economy, Republicans Warn: ‘Radical Anti-American Energy Agenda’