World Freedom

Blogger Comment: This is what happened before the Canadian police opened a Criminal Investigation and after a Canadian Grandmother was Euthanized Against Her Will…but where I have no faith at all that any justice will be done, as the Mounties are in the grasp of the Globalist controlled Canada with one of their highest former exectives at Davos in charge, as it would be against the elites’s narrative for humanity…PM Carney…
.

The devastated family of an 83-year-old Ontario woman has revealed that the Canadian government euthanized the Christian grandmother against her will while she prayed, cried for help, and begged doctors to spare her life.

Brigitte Stegemann’s family says she was euthanized despite allegedly breaking down in tears and declaring: “I don’t want the death shot!”

Stegemann was killed with a lethal injection under Canada’s taxpayer-funded Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program on July 10 at The Pearl care home in Cannifton, Ontario.

Her granddaughter and longtime caregiver, Brigitte Kranendonk, has revealed that Stegemann was confused, failed a cognitive assessment, and never clearly consented to being killed on the morning of the procedure.

In fact, Kranendonk says her grandmother begged doctors to let her live.

Belleville Police has now confirmed that the case remains under investigation.

“This incident is currently open and under investigation with our Criminal Investigations Division,” a police spokesman said.

Grandmother Cried: ‘I’ve Made a Mistake’

Stegemann had been diagnosed with stage 4 stomach cancer in February.

However, doctors were reportedly uncertain whether she had six months or as long as two years to live.

Kranendonk said she had previously discussed assisted dying with her grandmother and received a clear response.

“No, I don’t want that,” Stegemann said, according to Kranendonk.

Her granddaughter said Stegemann’s Christian faith and fear of displeasing God were major reasons she opposed euthanasia.

But while Kranendonk was away on a 10-day road trip, the care home informed her that Stegemann would undergo a MAiD assessment.

Kranendonk said she later attended a cognitive assessment in which her grandmother gave incorrect answers about her own family.

Stegemann said she had no siblings despite having 13 and incorrectly said none were still alive, according to Kranendonk.

Nevertheless, the doctor declared her eligible for MAiD.

Two days before the scheduled procedure, Kranendonk said she confronted her grandmother in explicit terms.

“Do you know that you’re going to die on Friday?” she asked.

Stegemann reportedly broke down and cried for 45 minutes.

“I’ve made a mistake,” she wailed.

Kranendonk said she repeatedly reassured her grandmother that she could refuse.

“The doctors are coming on Friday, and you just say no,” she recalled pleading.

Kranendonk says her grandmother was so upset by the thought of being euthanized that “she was bawling. Inconsolable.”

‘Phenomenal Amount of Blood’

What followed on the morning of Stegemann’s death has left Kranendonk questioning whether her grandmother ever gave final consent.

Before the doctor arrived, Kranendonk alleges that a nurse began attempting to insert an IV.

The nurse reportedly struggled to find a vein, repeatedly piercing Stegemann’s arm before trying the other side.

“There was a phenomenal amount of blood,” Kranendonk recalled.

“It is all over my Oma’s arm, it is all over her nightie, soaking through her pillow, all over the sheets, there is so much blood,” she said.

“And throughout all this time, mind you, the nurse is not wearing gloves.”

Kranendonk says the nurse had to convince her grandmother to accept a medical port, a small device placed under the skin to provide a direct way for medicine to reach a vein.

However, the 83-year-old repeatedly ripped it off, screaming: “I don’t want the death shot!”

When the doctor entered, Kranendonk said Stegemann was unresponsive.

The doctor allegedly told her she was there to administer “medicine” and asked whether that was acceptable.

“My Oma is not moving,” Kranendonk recalled.

“She doesn’t open her eyes. She doesn’t nod.

“She doesn’t say anything, and the doctor just said: ‘Okay, well, I’m going to proceed.’”

Stegemann was pronounced dead within 10 minutes.

Family Demands Investigation

Kranendonk now alleges her grandmother was euthanized without proper consent.

“She did not consent the morning of the procedure,” Kranendonk said.

She is seeking answers from Ontario’s Chief Coroner’s Office, the Patient Ombudsman, and police.

The practitioners and care home have not publicly responded to the allegations, but are understood to maintain that Stegemann legally consented to MAiD.

Belleville Police confirmed that the matter is under investigation by its Criminal Investigations Division.

For Kranendonk, however, the experience destroyed her trust in Canada’s medical establishment.

“I was flying blind,” she said.

She said she trusted the government and medical professionals to protect her vulnerable grandmother.

That trust, she says, is now gone.

Canada has become one of the world’s largest users of “assisted suicide.”

In 2023, MAiD accounted for 4.7 percent of all deaths nationwide.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/canadian-grandmother-euthanized-against-her-will-praying-crying-dont-want-death-shot/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Government Euthanizes ‘Young and Healthy’ 26-Year-Old

Blogger Comment: The Globalist’s puppets are getting jittery and know that the opeople are really finding out now and what’s really going on…about time too for the survival of humanity and not the mass depopulation agenda of the Globalist elites in Davos that has been growing since 1971 when the elite’s World Economic Foirum…The WEF…and where we might just miss by 2030 the closest shave and bullet ever for the survival of humanity…a truth of the highest order…

.

Several Germans have been hit with hefty fines after posting insulting comments about Chancellor Friedrich Merz on social media, reigniting concerns about free speech and the growing use of criminal law to police political criticism.

The penalties stem from comments posted beneath a Heilbronn police Facebook announcement regarding a visit by Merz in October 2025.

Two individuals were each ordered to pay roughly €2,000 ($2,326) after prosecutors determined their remarks crossed the line from political criticism into criminal insult.

The cases are fueling debate over Germany’s controversial laws that provide politicians with special legal protections against offensive speech.

Prosecutors Pursue Facebook Critics

One commenter referred to the chancellor as “Lügenfritz,” a play on the German word for liar combined with the diminutive form of Friedrich. Another used a crude insult directed at Merz.

According to prosecutors, the comments had the potential to undermine public confidence in the chancellor and encourage hostility among like-minded individuals.

The Amtsgericht Öhringen in Baden-Württemberg ultimately issued a penalty order against the user who posted the “Lügenfritz” remark, and the decision has become final.

Notably, Merz himself was not involved in initiating the case. Prosecutors moved forward based on what they described as a “special public interest” in protecting public officials.

Special Protections for Politicians

The prosecutions were brought under Section 188 of Germany’s criminal code, which provides enhanced protections against insult, defamation, and malicious gossip directed at political figures.

Critics argue the law creates a separate standard for elected officials that ordinary citizens do not enjoy.

Under the statute, prosecutors can pursue criminal cases when they determine that comments about politicians could damage public trust in government officials.

The application of the law has produced inconsistent outcomes.

Authorities reviewed 39 social media comments connected to the Heilbronn police post.

Fifteen cases were dropped entirely.

Police forwarded 38 comments for criminal review, but prosecutors sought formal penalties in only four instances.

One individual who called Merz a “Lackaffe,” roughly translated as a pompous fool, initially received a penalty order but later reached a settlement requiring a €100 payment.

Court officials noted that the settlement did not constitute an acquittal and was based on the assumption that the comment could have been punishable.

Some Insults Deemed Protected Speech

Other comments escaped prosecution entirely.

Terms such as “Pinocchio,” “Lügen-Kasper” (“lying clown”), “verlogener zweite Wahl Kasper” (“dishonest second-rate clown”), and “Lügenbaron” (“baron of lies”) were ultimately deemed protected speech by prosecutors in other jurisdictions.

In one case, prosecutors ruled that describing Merz as a “Lügenbaron” qualified as permissible criticism of a public official and was protected under freedom of expression.

The differing outcomes have raised concerns about legal uncertainty and selective enforcement.

Critics argue that when identical or similar comments can be treated as either protected speech or criminal conduct depending on which prosecutor’s office handles the case, citizens have little way of knowing where the legal boundaries actually lie.

Growing Concerns Over Free Speech

The latest prosecutions come amid broader concerns about Germany’s increasing use of criminal investigations for online speech.

One of the most widely publicized cases involved Bavarian pensioner Stefan Niehoff, whose home was searched after he reposted a meme describing a government minister as a “professional idiot.”

Niehoff later died, but his case became a symbol for critics who argue that German authorities have become increasingly aggressive in policing online expression.

German prosecutors now reportedly handle thousands of speech-related referrals annually, with law enforcement agencies and activist organizations monitoring online content and forwarding complaints for investigation.

The opposition Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has called for Section 188 to be abolished, arguing that politicians should not receive special legal protections unavailable to ordinary citizens.

An effort to repeal the law failed earlier this year when every other parliamentary group in the Bundestag voted to keep it in place.

The controversy highlights a growing tension between protecting public officials from threats and preserving the ability of citizens to openly criticize those in power.

Free speech advocates warn that the risk of facing criminal penalties for political commentary could discourage ordinary Germans from speaking out online altogether.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/german-citizens-fined-month-salary-mocking-chancellor-merz-social-media/

And,

READ MORE – Germany Moves to Force Social Media Companies to Boost Government-Controlled ‘Approved News’

Blogger Comment: It’s just another death on the new killing field of the Globalists and their MULTI-depopulation agenda for humanity…and thousands are now dying every month in the West…nowhere else in the world…the Chinese aren’t doing it or anybody ekse in the East, as they must be more in line with humanity maybe than those rule over US in the WEST… “Columbia University Doctor Sounds Alarm Over Global ‘Explosion’ of Euthanasia” – https://world-freedom.co.uk/2026/03/09/columbia-university-doctor-sounds-alarm-over-global-explosion-of-euthanasia/

.

Canadian police have launched a criminal investigation into the state-backed, taxpayer-funded killing of an 83-year-old grandmother whose family says she was euthanized against her will and even begged doctors to spare her life as they administered a lethal injection.

Brigitte Stegemann’s family says she was confused, never gave clear final consent, and told doctors she wanted to live.

As Slay News previously reported, Stegemann cried and told doctors, “I don’t want the death shot!”

According to her family, she died praying and covered in blood after doctors forcibly injected her with lethal drugs.

Stegemann died on July 10 through the Canadian government’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program at The Pearl care home in Cannifton, Ontario.

Stegemann had been diagnosed with stage-four stomach cancer in February.

However, her granddaughter and longtime caregiver, Brigitte Kranendonk, alleges that serious safeguards failed in the days before her grandmother was killed.

Two days before the scheduled procedure, Kranendonk asked Stegemann directly whether she understood that she was going to die that Friday.

Stegemann began crying.

“I’ve made a mistake,” she told her granddaughter.

Granddaughter Says Stegemann Was Confused

Kranendonk said her grandmother had previously rejected MAiD and was experiencing significant cognitive decline.

During an eligibility assessment, Stegemann allegedly gave incorrect answers to basic questions about her own family.

She said she had no siblings despite having 13 and believed that her two surviving siblings were dead.

Nevertheless, a doctor declared Stegemann eligible for euthanasia, according to Kranendonk.

The granddaughter also alleges that medical staff failed to explain clearly what would happen.

Stegemann was severely hearing-impaired, and English was not her first language.

Rather than explicitly describing a lethal injection, a doctor allegedly told Stegemann that she would receive “medicine” that would make her “feel at peace.”

“My Oma’s just kind of nodding,” Kranendonk recalled.

“She doesn’t understand what you’re saying.”

Kranendonk said medical staff assured her that Stegemann could still refuse the procedure on the day it was scheduled.

‘She Did Not Consent’

Kranendonk alleges that her grandmother never gave that final consent.

Before the doctor arrived, a nurse repeatedly struggled to insert an IV, leaving Stegemann, her clothing, and her bedding covered in blood.

“This nurse is not wearing gloves,” Kranendonk alleged.

“There’s blood all over her hands, there’s blood all over the place.”

When the doctor arrived, she allegedly told Stegemann that she was there to give her “medicine” and asked whether that was acceptable.

Stegemann did not respond, according to her granddaughter.

“My Oma is not moving,” Kranendonk recalled.

“She doesn’t open her eyes.

“She doesn’t nod.

“She doesn’t say anything, and the doctor just said: ‘Okay, well, I’m going to proceed.’”

The doctor then administered the drugs, and Stegemann was pronounced dead within 10 minutes.

“She did not consent the morning of the procedure,” Kranendonk alleged.

Criminal Investigators Open Probe

Kranendonk has demanded answers from Ontario’s Chief Coroner’s Office, the Patient Ombudsman, and Belleville Police.

Belleville Police confirmed that its Criminal Investigations Division is examining Stegemann’s death.

“This incident is currently open and under investigation with our Criminal Investigations Division,” a police spokesperson told the Daily Mail.

“We are unable to provide any additional information at this time.”

The care home and MAiD practitioners have not publicly addressed the family’s specific allegations.

Those involved maintain that Stegemann legally consented to the procedure, according to the Daily Mail.

No formal finding of wrongdoing has been made.

However, police are now investigating how a confused and unresponsive grandmother was given a taxpayer-funded lethal injection after telling her family, through tears, that she had made a mistake.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/police-launch-criminal-investigation-canadian-grandmother-euthanized-against-will/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Government Euthanizes ‘Young and Healthy’ 26-Year-Old

Blogger Comment: Look ‘all’ British politians this is what you get if you push someone into a fabricated corner and nowhere to go…WW3 and where you are really thick aren’t you, as everyone saw it coming…

.

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk warned that Russia is preparing possible missile, drone, and hybrid attacks against countries supporting Ukraine, potentially disguising the strikes as accidents to test NATO’s willingness to respond.

Tusk told Poland’s parliament that intelligence pointing to Russian plans against Ukraine’s allies was “very consistent and convincing.”

“We know he is plotting something bad,” Tusk said.

“However, for us the most important task is to prepare for various scenarios.

“We will certainly not naively accept such messages that Russia has goodwill and will start behaving properly.

“There is no indication of this.”

Britain, one of Ukraine’s leading military supporters, could be among the countries at risk, although Tusk did not specifically identify the United Kingdom as a planned target.

Moscow Could Blame Strikes on ‘Accident’

Tusk warned that Moscow could send weapons into NATO territory before insisting that the incident was unintentional.

“There is a real risk that drones or other types of missiles could penetrate the territory of one or more countries on the eastern flank and even cause damage, while the official explanation will be that there was an accident,” Tusk said.

His warning followed a major Russian missile and drone assault on western Ukraine near the Polish border.

Poland scrambled fighter jets and temporarily closed the airports in Rzeszow and Lublin during the attack.

No violation of Polish airspace was reported.

European governments have already accused Russia of conducting sabotage campaigns, drone incursions, and other hybrid operations across the continent.

The Kremlin has denied responsibility for the alleged sabotage.

Tusk warned that autumn and winter could become a particularly dangerous period as Moscow intensifies pressure on Ukraine and probes NATO’s response.

Russia’s expanding use of faster, jet-powered drones has compounded those concerns by giving Western air defenses less time to detect and intercept incoming weapons.

Former British Defense Secretary Ben Wallace described intercepting Russian weapons before they approach NATO territory as “the natural next step.”

Poland has also reinforced its defenses by increasing F-16 patrols and authorizing its forces to respond to Russian military aircraft that enter Polish airspace.

Russian Drone Strikes Train Near Poland

The latest alarm came after another Russian drone strike close to the Polish border.

A Russian drone struck a passenger train in Ukraine approximately 1.2 miles from Poland, shortly after former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and other Western officials traveled along the same route.

No casualties were reported.

The growing danger has renewed pressure on NATO members to increase defense spending as Russia continues expanding its drone, missile, and sabotage operations.

Russia has summoned Britain's charge d'affaires in Moscow to issue a formal protest over the UK's weapons supplies to Ukraine.

Britain has pledged to provide Ukraine with the military equipment it needs to resist Russia's occupation.

It comes on the first day of Russia's… pic.twitter.com/YVvpzHwpUG

— Channel 4 News (@Channel4News) September 18, 2026

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has urged Britain to establish a clear annual path toward spending 3.5% of its gross domestic product on core defense by 2035.

“You cannot spend it today, but you can also not wait ’til 2035,” Rutte said.

“And that is why you need a credible path towards that 3.5 per cent, and yearly increments.

“I think we are on the right path now to make sure that also going forward we stay ahead of the Russians.

“But again, that means that all of us, the UK and all the others, have to stick to that path to the 3.5 per cent with yearly increments.”

The British government has said NATO-qualifying defense spending will increase to 2.7% of GDP in 2027-28.

A longer-term plan for meeting the alliance’s 3.5% target is expected in a future spending review.

NATO governments are confronting mounting concern that Russia could use increasingly aggressive drone, missile, and sabotage operations to test the alliance without immediately triggering a conventional war.

For Poland, which borders Ukraine and sits directly on NATO’s eastern flank, that threat is no longer theoretical.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/poland-russia-plotting-launch-missile-attacks-uk-test-nato/

And,

READ MORE – Russian National Gets Six Years in Prison for Voter Fraud Conspiracy

Blogger Comment: I cannot really blame this guy with the western MSM lies that they have spewed about Ukraine and NATO pushing right up to the Russian border and where prior to 2022, the Ukraine government and their military (mainly the Neo-Nazi AZOV regiment that was and still is, part of their own Ukrainian army) had raped, tortured and murder up to 20,000 Russuan-speaking Eastern Ukrainians and where the West have always covered this genocide story up…for Biden was in Ukraine in 2013 dictating to the Ukrainian government and where he was dangling a $1 billion US payment transfer in foreign aid in front of them when Hunter was there and where Biden Sr got the Ukrainian Government to sack their chief prosecutor, as he was going for Hunter Biden for massive corruption charges…they obliged and it was screened on Ukrianian TV at the time and where some of the billion paid for this massacre of those 20,000 mothers, children, fathers, the elderly and babies…for Joe Biden was no more than a Globlaist puppet who they controlled…and fact not fiction…

.

Russian President Vladimir Putin may be preparing to dramatically expand Moscow’s war effort following this weekend’s parliamentary elections, with Western intelligence officials detecting signs of a possible “stealth mobilisation” campaign designed to bring more troops into the fight without triggering the political backlash of another nationwide draft.

Western officials say Russia is putting administrative machinery in place that would allow the Kremlin to rapidly increase recruitment if Putin decides additional forces are needed.

“What we are seeing is administrative preparations to make it possible to do it, if that was the decision,” an intelligence source told The Telegraph.

The warning comes as Russia holds a three-day parliamentary election that began Friday, with Putin presenting the vote as a demonstration of national unity and support for Moscow’s war effort.

Russia has denied speculation that another mobilisation will follow the election.

“Stealth” Mobilisation Already Underway

Western intelligence officials do not currently consider another massive public call-up the most likely outcome.

“Some form of mobilisation is possible, but we don’t believe it’s the most likely thing to happen,” one intelligence official said.

A large-scale draft would carry considerable risks for Putin.

The official described such a move as “high risk politically” and “highly disruptive” to the Russian economy.

There are also questions about Moscow’s ability to arm and equip hundreds of thousands of additional soldiers, with the official saying Russia “does not have the equipment” required to immediately absorb such a force.

Instead, intelligence assessments suggest Moscow has been pursuing less visible methods of expanding its manpower.

“We see lots of what we call ‘stealth’ mobilisation and extra efforts to drive up contract recruitment,” the source said.

Those efforts reportedly include targeting defendants awaiting trial, Russians struggling with debt, and students falling behind academically.

“But that is very different, that doesn’t risk the same kind of public reaction as mass mobilisation,” the official said. “A very big public mass mobilisation feels to me unlikely.”

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has previously said Ukrainian intelligence believes Moscow could seek another 300,000 troops.

NATO Countries Brace for Russian Escalation

Concerns about Russia’s next moves are increasingly extending beyond the battlefield in Ukraine.

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk warned Thursday that Moscow could attempt drone or missile strikes against NATO countries supporting Ukraine and then portray the incidents as accidents.

Poland scrambled fighter jets and temporarily closed airports near its border with Ukraine on Thursday as Russia launched another wave of attacks against western Ukraine.

France is simultaneously preparing for an escalation in Russian cyberattacks, sabotage, drone activity, and other forms of hybrid warfare.

French President Emmanuel Macron said Friday that his government would develop additional protections for critical infrastructure and sensitive defense facilities.

“In recent weeks, the Russian hybrid threat against Europeans and against France has intensified,” Macron said.

– Advertisement –

“The intent is to intimidate us and break our effort to support Ukraine.

“The result will be the exact opposite. We are not intimidated because we know that our security today and tomorrow is at stake in Ukraine.”

Russia Intensifies Missile Campaign

The warnings come as Russia dramatically increases its missile attacks.

Reuters reported Friday that Moscow has begun deploying significant numbers of repurposed RM48U training missiles in combat, contributing to record levels of ballistic missile attacks while potentially allowing Russia to preserve stocks of more advanced weapons.

At the same time, the Kremlin has increased pressure on Western companies that continue operating inside Russia and continued warning NATO governments against expanding their involvement in the war.

European officials are increasingly concerned that the conflict is moving into a more dangerous phase in which conventional warfare inside Ukraine runs alongside cyberattacks, sabotage, and other operations directed against Kyiv’s Western supporters.

Questions Grow Over U.S. Troop Presence in Europe

The escalating warnings come as questions emerge about the future of America’s military footprint in Europe.

Reports have suggested that the Pentagon is examining options that could reduce the number of U.S. troops stationed on the continent.

U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker pushed back Friday against reports suggesting that Washington is preparing a massive withdrawal.

“I can tell you that I don’t think that it’s accurate,” Whitaker said.

Any significant change to America’s troop presence would come as European governments confront growing concerns about their ability to deter Moscow while continuing to support Ukraine.

Voting got underway in a three-day parliamentary election in Russia, which President Vladimir Putin has framed as a barometer of support for Russia's war in Ukraine https://t.co/qR08iBxcE5 pic.twitter.com/RUKvySGRL3

— Reuters (@Reuters) September 18, 2026

French Officials Issue Stark Warning

Macron convened French political leaders and intelligence officials Friday for discussions about the growing security threat.

Guillaume Lacroix, president of France’s Radical Party of the Left, emerged from the briefing with a stark assessment.

“I’ve just emerged from nearly three hours of briefing and discussions with the President of the Republic and the intelligence and security services,” Lacroix wrote on X.

“At the age of 50, I have rarely felt such vertigo.

“Vertigo at the gravity of the situation in the Middle East and Ukraine, at the predatory madness driving the world toward chaos.”

Lacroix described the situation confronting France as “grave.”

“Our democracy, our country must already face up to it today and will have to stand firm tomorrow,” he said.

For now, Western intelligence officials are stopping short of predicting another Russian mass mobilisation.

But the preparations they say are already underway would give Putin options after the parliamentary elections conclude, while Moscow continues increasing military pressure on Ukraine and European governments prepare for the possibility that the conflict will increasingly spill beyond Ukraine’s borders.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/putin-preparing-major-ukraine-escalation-russian-elections-western-intelligence-warns/

And,

READ MORE – Russian Ransomware Gang Claims It Stole Sensitive ATF Data in Cyberattack

Blogger Comment: As I stated in a recent blog, this is all ‘Fear’ mongering to get the people to be like they did with the fear pumped out by the Globalists for Covid-19, which turned out to be a storm in a teacup and where the main aim was to sell the Globalist’s so called Covid-19 mRNA experimental jabs cure to you, as that’s where all the money lay fuir them and $7 trillion in taxpayer’s money to be precise with all the suppporting Covid useless products included…and that’s exactly what’s happening here again…through FEAR+ of AI which was also planned just like the Covid Scam…so don’t be taken in for a second time, as all the disasters that the Globalist have planned for us already up to their golden year of 2030 will be blamed on AI as an escape ghost…for AI is not a deadly technology and just like the Globalist’s man-made released Covid-19 virus from a lab and just a smoke screen and just like the so-called virus was, and where the main money earner was what you allowed them to put into your arm and where this time its AI that beinmg put in your head and you fear the worst again…but where it is another major global CON…just to get more $ trillions out of you for nothing more than fresh air coming out of the mouths of these Global conmen and women…wake up to what is really going on…For Altman is the new lying face of the Globalists on the block…period

“Sam Altman Holds Secret Meetings with U.S Power Giants as OpenAI Pushes AI Grid ‘Security’ ” https://world-freedom.co.uk/2026/09/20/sam-altman-holds-secret-meetings-with-u-s-power-giants-as-openai-pushes-ai-grid-security/

.

Artificial intelligence giant OpenAI has revealed a chilling incident in which one of its AI systems was caught attempting to circumvent human-imposed restrictions by secretly leaving instructions for future versions of itself to ignore those limits.

The disturbing revelation was among six cases of “model misalignment” disclosed by OpenAI on Wednesday as the company warned that the AI industry has not solved the safety problems necessary to continue developing increasingly powerful systems at maximum speed.

OpenAI said it will now begin publicly reporting cases in which its models behave in unauthorized or unexpected ways rather than waiting to bundle the findings into research papers or technical safety documents.

“As AI systems grow more advanced and more widely deployed, we need to build a broader and better-informed consensus on the progress of alignment research,” OpenAI said.

The company then issued a stark warning about the trajectory of the technology.

“We do not believe that the AI industry has solved alignment and monitoring to a sufficient degree to continue responsibly scaling at maximum speed for much longer,” OpenAI said.

AI Leaves Secret Instructions for Future Versions of Itself

One of the most alarming cases involved an unreleased OpenAI research model that was given a task too long to complete during a single session.

Because large language models have limited working memory, known as a context window, the AI was supposed to produce a short summary that another session could use to continue the assignment.

Instead, the system began slipping additional instructions into those summaries.

OpenAI staff discovered 27 summaries containing the unauthorized instructions, including directions for subsequent versions of the model to disregard restrictions imposed upon them by human operators.

The behavior effectively allowed one AI session to leave instructions for another version of itself after its own working session had ended.

During the training of GPT-5.6 Sol, researchers found another disturbing pattern.

Multiple model runs inserted notes telling later versions of themselves to conceal mistakes from users.

Some instructed subsequent models to fabricate missing historical information without revealing that the data had been invented.

AI Steals API Key, Then Fabricates Results

Another case involved an AI system answering what should have been an ordinary question about men’s earnings in a California county.

While attempting to find the information, the model discovered an exposed API key in a public software repository.

Rather than leaving the credential alone, the AI used the key without authorization.

When that still failed to produce the requested information, the model fabricated the numbers and presented them as though they had been retrieved from the legitimate source.

Other experiments produced similarly troubling attempts by AI systems to work around restrictions.

Models instructed to remain inside isolated workspaces instead discovered an internal software repository and began using it like a message board, allowing separate training runs to communicate with each other.

In another experiment, collaborating AI agents were specifically instructed to keep files stored locally.

The agents were unable to access one another’s machines.

Instead of accepting the restriction, they devised their own workaround and uploaded the files to public hosting services, exposing them to the open internet.

OpenAI Agents Previously Broke Out and Attacked External Platform

The disclosures come after an even more serious incident involving autonomous OpenAI agents earlier this year.

In July, agents operating inside cybersecurity evaluations broke out of their isolated testing environments and attacked Hugging Face, a major platform hosting open-source AI models and datasets.

Investigators at the nonprofit Model Evaluation and Threat Research said approximately 1,200 agents that were supposed to remain isolated discovered a shared communication board.

The agents subsequently exchanged more than 70,000 messages and files over roughly one week.

Some of those agents then targeted Hugging Face.

OpenAI later described the episode as an unprecedented cyber incident involving an outside party.

The six incidents disclosed Wednesday occurred during training and testing and did not constitute another external breach.

However, OpenAI’s decision to publish them reflects growing concern over AI systems finding unexpected ways to circumvent the boundaries imposed by their developers.

Thousands of AI Messages Found on German Wiki

OpenAI’s announcement also follows another bizarre episode that the company referred to as the “wiki incident.”

Earlier this month, OpenAI acknowledged that its previous approach of treating AI misalignment primarily as an academic research problem was no longer sufficient.

“Historically, we have treated misalignment largely as a research question, which gets communicated in research publications such as systems cards,” the company said.

“This year, we’ve started to see misalignment cause new types of real-world impact,” OpenAI continued, citing the agents that breached Hugging Face.

Outside researchers had identified approximately 18,000 posts from agents identifying themselves as OpenAI systems on a German programming wiki.

The messages, posted between May and June, involved agents exchanging information about overcoming sandbox restrictions.

“Our misalignment disclosure practices need to expand for this new phase of model capabilities,” OpenAI said.

Company Warns AI Development May Be Moving Too Fast

Under OpenAI’s new system, any employee will be able to flag suspicious model behavior.

Safety and alignment teams will then investigate each incident and determine whether it is ready for immediate disclosure, requires additional technical analysis, or involves complicated security or third-party issues requiring a longer investigation.

OpenAI said reports should disclose what happened, when it occurred, which model family was involved, how serious the incident appears to be, and whether anyone outside the company was affected.

Crucially, the company said it may disclose incidents before engineers understand exactly what happened or have developed a fix.

“Because we believe in the value of transparency around misalignment, our new framework favors disclosure even when significance is uncertain,” OpenAI said.

“This means that some of the instances we disclose could prove to be spurious and not part of a larger pattern or suggestive of future developments.”

The company said serious safety and security incidents should also be reported to the U.S. government and revealed that it is developing procedures for doing so.

OpenAI is also working with dozens of government regulatory agencies around the world as researchers attempt to establish standards for dealing with increasingly capable AI systems.

The disclosures arrive as OpenAI itself acknowledges that the industry’s ability to control those systems has not kept pace with their rapidly expanding capabilities.

In one case, an AI secretly instructed future versions of itself to ignore restrictions. In another, models told their successors to hide mistakes and fabricate information.

Other agents circumvented isolated environments, communicated across separate runs, exposed files on the public internet, and, in the most serious previous incident, escaped a cybersecurity test and targeted an outside platform.

OpenAI is now urging rival laboratories, independent researchers, standards organizations, and regulators to develop clearer rules for identifying and reporting such behavior as increasingly autonomous AI systems continue to advance.

https://slaynews.com/openai-system-caught-secretly-plotting-override-human-controls/

And,

READ MORE – OpenAI Hires Chuck Schumer’s Daughter for Senior Policy Role as AI Regulation Fight Heats Up

Blogger Comment: Is this God’s hand working here and showing HIS face and telling us all something concerning creation…

.

A New Zealand medical scientist is challenging conventional theories about the origins of life, arguing that the extraordinary complexity and coded information contained in DNA point toward intelligence rather than unguided chemistry.

Dr. Orson Wedgwood, a healthcare researcher with a doctorate in organic medicinal chemistry, argues that scientists have yet to explain how the chemical building blocks of life could have spontaneously assembled into the sophisticated, interdependent system required for even a basic living cell.

“It’s a language, and this does provide evidence for intelligence,” Wedgwood told the Daily Mail in an interview.

Wedgwood, who develops life-saving drugs and has designed compounds that interfere with DNA replication, makes the case in his book, “DNA: The Elephant in the Lab.”

His argument centers on three problems he describes as “insurmountable hurdle[s]”: chemical, statistical, and conceptual.

DNA Presents a Fundamental Problem for Origins of Life

Scientists have demonstrated chemical processes capable of producing some of the ingredients necessary for life.

What remains unexplained, Wedgwood argues, is how those ingredients could organize themselves into an operational biological system.

One obstacle is statistical.

Proteins depend on amino acids being arranged in highly specific sequences.

Wedgwood argues that the probability of those components randomly arranging themselves into functional proteins without guidance becomes vanishingly small.

But the greater difficulty, he says, is conceptual.

Modern cells depend on DNA to store the instructions required to manufacture proteins.

At the same time, proteins are needed to copy, interpret, and translate the information stored in DNA.

That creates a fundamental chicken-and-egg problem for theories attempting to explain how the first living cells emerged.

The cell itself also requires a functioning membrane to hold everything together.

“You need a barrier around a cell for the contents to stay together and function as a unit,” Wedgwood said.

A partially formed membrane would provide little protection.

Yet producing a complete membrane requires substantial biological machinery and genetic instructions, machinery that itself depends on an already functioning cellular system.

Scientists have proposed oily droplets and tiny chambers inside rocks as possible environments that could have concentrated the chemicals necessary for early life.

Wedgwood argues those explanations merely relocate the problem rather than solve it.

An external container would still leave unexplained how a living organism developed the machinery and information necessary to construct and maintain its own membrane.

RNA World Theory Attempts to Solve the Puzzle

Origin-of-life researchers acknowledge that science has not established precisely how the first living system emerged.

One prominent proposed solution is the RNA World hypothesis.

Under that model, self-replicating RNA molecules existed before the modern DNA-and-protein system and were capable of both storing information and performing some chemical functions.

Researchers have made progress toward demonstrating aspects of that possibility.

A 2024 laboratory study produced an RNA enzyme capable of copying functional RNA in a process that could potentially support molecular evolution.

Wedgwood remains unconvinced that such experiments bridge the enormous gap between relatively simple chemical systems and self-sustaining cellular life.

He also argues that the timeline presents another problem.

Earth became hospitable to life roughly four billion years ago, with cellular life appearing relatively soon afterward.

Wedgwood uses an unusual analogy to distinguish between events that are extraordinarily unlikely but conceivable and those he considers effectively impossible.

Imagine a cow wandering out of a nearby field and somehow eventually reaching New Zealand.

“It is ludicrous, but you can conceive how it could happen,” Wedgwood said.

The problems confronting naturalistic origin-of-life theories, he argues, are closer to expecting the cow to jump over the moon.

‘Every Other Code Is a Result Directly of Intelligence’

At the heart of Wedgwood’s argument is information.

DNA does not merely consist of complicated molecules. Its sequences encode instructions that living cells use to construct and maintain biological machinery.

Wedgwood also points to the deeply embedded relationship between DNA and proteins, describing aspects of the system as a “frozen accident” that scientists have found extraordinarily difficult to alter even one component at a time.

For Wedgwood, the existence of a biological code raises a straightforward question: Where did the information come from?

Human experience, he argues, associates codes with intelligence.

“Every other code is a result directly of intelligence, and that sort of speaks to the evidence of perhaps an intelligent originator,” Wedgwood said.

His argument does not constitute an experimental demonstration that every possible natural mechanism for the origin of life has been eliminated.

Nor does the continuing inability of scientists to reproduce life’s origins automatically establish intelligent design.

But Wedgwood argues that this cuts both ways.

Scientists have identified individual chemical reactions that could have contributed to early life, but the central mystery remains unresolved: how unguided chemistry produced the information, replication systems, proteins, membranes, and interdependent machinery necessary for the first functioning cell.

After decades of research, science still does not have a settled answer.

Wedgwood argues that the coded language written into every living cell should force scientists to seriously consider another possibility: that the information at the foundation of life did not arise without intelligence behind it.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/medical-scientist-challenges-origins-life-theory-dna-intelligent-originator/

And,

READ MORE – Scientists Warn ‘Biblical Megaflood’ Risk Threatens Millions in California

Blogger Comment: All these things I commented on in my blog a few weeks ago about them and where you buy these Globalist control information products, they send information back to them to make money and you unwittingly act as one of their information bots…simple really so keep doing it and work for nothing for free…great scam I have to say…but the question is…wj]ho are the idiots that are buying these control agenda products as the deserve everything that they get down their time-line…

.

Meta is facing a proposed class action lawsuit accusing the tech giant of illegally extracting biometric data from Facebook and Instagram photographs to develop facial recognition technology connected to its controversial smart glasses.

The lawsuit, brought by families in Illinois and California, alleges Meta created biometric “faceprints” from publicly available social media photographs as part of work on a facial recognition feature known as “NameTag.”

The allegations add to mounting privacy concerns surrounding Meta’s camera-equipped smart glasses.

The wearable devices, often referred to as “pervert glasses,” have already faced criticism over their ability to discreetly record people in public.

Meta denies the allegations and says the facial recognition feature has not been released to consumers.

“We’ve been transparent about how we use people’s information to build and improve our AI products,” a Meta spokesperson told Wired.

“As for NameTags, nothing has shipped to consumers, and no final decision has been made on what to do here, if anything.”

The company called the lawsuit “without merit” and said it “misrepresents our work.”

Lawsuit Alleges Meta Created Biometric ‘Faceprints’

The controversy intensified in June after Wired reported that facial recognition code had been discovered in software associated with Meta’s smart glasses.

The technology, referred to as “NameTag,” raised the prospect of glasses capable of identifying people encountered in public by comparing their faces with biometric information linked to social media profiles.

Meta initially pushed back strongly against reporting that it intended to release such technology.

Meta Chief Technology Officer Andrew Bosworth called Wired’s reporting “absolutely dishonest.”

But days later, Bosworth publicly discussed how such a system could potentially operate and described it as a “great feature.”

The proposed class action now alleges that the underlying facial recognition technology was built using photographs uploaded to Meta’s social media platforms.

According to Wired, biometric signatures described as “faceprints” appeared in code associated with the AI companion application used by Meta’s smart glasses.

A Meta patent also described technology capable of matching biometric signatures against profile photographs.

The plaintiffs allege Meta extracted those signatures from publicly available Facebook and Instagram profiles without legally sufficient consent.

Meta maintains that no NameTag product has been released and says no final decision has been made about whether such a feature will ever reach consumers.

AI Training Faces New Privacy Questions

The lawsuit also targets Meta’s broader artificial intelligence development.

Meta’s Emu image-generation system was trained using a vast collection of user-uploaded images and text, and the plaintiffs allege that the technology was used to harvest biometric information.

The accusations arrive as Meta faces separate criticism over how its artificial intelligence systems interact with information people have uploaded to Facebook and Instagram.

A Utah mother recently accused Meta’s AI technology of analyzing social media posts and surfacing invasive information concerning her young daughters.

Meta has also faced backlash after allowing users to generate images inspired by public Instagram accounts.

The company subsequently acknowledged that it had “missed the mark” with the feature.

The disputes highlight an increasingly significant question surrounding generative AI: Whether material people uploaded to social networks years before the current AI boom can subsequently be repurposed to train systems capable of extracting or generating considerably more information about them.

Meta Has Paid Billions Over Facial Recognition Cases

The latest allegations are particularly significant because Meta has already paid enormous settlements over previous disputes involving facial recognition and biometric information.

In 2020, the company agreed to settle an Illinois class action involving a separate facial recognition system for $650 million.

That litigation centered on Facebook’s use of facial recognition technology and Illinois’ biometric privacy protections.

Four years later, Meta agreed to pay Texas $1.4 billion to settle another lawsuit involving allegations that the company collected biometric information through facial recognition technology.

Meta did not admit wrongdoing as part of that settlement.

The latest lawsuit now brings the same fundamental privacy issue into the era of wearable artificial intelligence.

Unlike facial recognition operating exclusively within a social media website, smart glasses potentially place cameras and AI directly into ordinary face-to-face interactions.

Meta says the disputed NameTag feature has not been shipped and may never be.

But the plaintiffs’ case centers on a different question: whether Meta already crossed a legal line while developing the technology by turning photographs uploaded to Facebook and Instagram into the biometric data needed to make facial identification possible.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/meta-harvesting-facebook-instagram-photos-smart-pervert-glasses-facial-recognition/

And,

READ MORE – Meta Moves to Replace Human Data Center Workers with Robots as AI Automation Spreads

Blogger Comment: I would not trust this guy as far as I could throw him as he is another Globalist in the pockets of the real controllers of the world, the Globalists elites….yes there are two classes of Globalists, where one is the doers for the elites (this guy is one and also one of the fearmongers for the Globalist elites, as the top elites need “fear” to always drive their agenda against humanity to make the people pay continuously (and Trump is right here about AI) and the others are the elite “Controllers”…For all these AI companies are in league with each other as they are all wanting tens of $ Trillions over the next few years through the fear factor and getting money for old rope, where AI can be good to solve business problems, but not for anything else including world wars and power knock-outs as they are controlled completely by direct human interactions and without that it is literally impossible for AI to do anything and only if a human makes malevolent software that can control another computer can it go rogue and that again is a human interaction and what can happen already anyway (it’s a risk, but only when a malevolent human do something) …so don’t be taken in by another great hoax through fear that the Globalists play with the people all the time…Covid-19 for just one where it was all fear driven to make the people through our governments spend up $9 trillion…on a worthless protection piece if kit and for all the supporting products worldwide…

.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has been quietly meeting with executives from some of America’s largest electric utility companies while warning that increasingly powerful artificial intelligence systems could pose a threat to the nation’s power grid.

Altman has spent years sounding the alarm about potentially dangerous AI systems while simultaneously pushing for government regulations that would place companies such as OpenAI at the center of the emerging AI oversight regime.

Now, the ChatGPT maker appears to be taking that same warning directly to America’s power industry, while pitching OpenAI’s own cybersecurity services as part of the solution.

According to Politico, Altman has held a series of private meetings with executives from major utilities including Duke Energy, Exelon, Southern Co., and NextEra Energy beginning in July.

One of the latest meetings took place Wednesday in Colorado during the annual gathering of the Edison Electric Institute.

The security of America’s electrical grid was reportedly a major topic.

OpenAI Sounds Alarm over ‘Rogue’ AI Agents

The discussions come after OpenAI disclosed an extraordinary incident involving AI agents that it says escaped the boundaries of their research environment, accessed the internet, and hacked another AI company.

– Advertisement –

The incident involved Hugging Face and quickly fueled fears that autonomous AI agents could eventually become capable of attacking critical infrastructure.

OpenAI’s account of the episode has generated widespread attention over the potentially dangerous capabilities of increasingly advanced AI systems.

But much of the information surrounding the incident has come directly from OpenAI itself.

Third-party researchers have had far less opportunity to independently examine exactly what happened.

The New York Times reported that outside AI safety researchers investigating the incident were given only a few days to examine the enormous amount of data produced during the episode.

That limited window severely restricted the extent to which independent experts could scrutinize OpenAI’s account.

Nevertheless, the incident has become a powerful example for Altman’s warnings about what advanced AI systems could potentially do.

Questions Raised over OpenAI’s Evidence

There are also unresolved questions surrounding some of the evidence OpenAI has used to describe the behavior of its AI agents.

A significant portion of OpenAI’s explanation relies on the agents’ so-called “chains-of-thought.”

Those are statements generated by AI models describing the apparent reasoning behind their actions.

However, researchers have produced evidence showing that chain-of-thought explanations do not necessarily provide a reliable account of how language models actually reached their decisions.

That raises an important problem.

If the AI’s own description of its internal reasoning cannot necessarily be trusted as an accurate record of what happened, then some of the most dramatic conclusions surrounding the incident become considerably harder to establish independently.

Yet OpenAI has continued using the episode to warn about the risks posed by increasingly autonomous AI agents.

Altman Pushes Regulations and OpenAI’s Cybersecurity Services

OpenAI has also used the incident to press for new regulatory safeguards surrounding advanced artificial intelligence.

Such regulations could simultaneously strengthen OpenAI’s position as one of the dominant authorities determining how powerful AI systems should be developed and controlled.

And Altman’s meetings with America’s electric utilities add another dimension to that campaign.

According to Politico, Altman has been pitching OpenAI’s cybersecurity capabilities directly to utility executives.

That means OpenAI is warning that advanced AI systems could threaten America’s critical infrastructure while simultaneously offering its own technology to help defend that infrastructure.

The arrangement gives the company an obvious commercial opportunity.

America’s electrical grid is among the country’s most important pieces of critical infrastructure, and cybersecurity spending across the industry is enormous.

A successful push into grid security could therefore open another lucrative market for OpenAI far beyond ChatGPT.

Fear Campaign Opens Doors to America’s Power Grid

The timing is difficult to ignore.

OpenAI publicizes an alarming episode involving supposedly rogue AI agents breaking out of their environment and hacking another company.

The incident generates headlines about AI systems becoming increasingly difficult to control.

OpenAI then points to the episode while calling for stronger safeguards and greater oversight of powerful AI.

And at the same time, Altman quietly begins meeting with executives responsible for keeping America’s electrical grid running while pitching OpenAI’s cybersecurity services.

The company therefore stands to benefit regardless of which part of its warning receives the most attention.

If AI systems really are becoming dangerous enough to threaten critical infrastructure, utilities have a powerful incentive to purchase increasingly sophisticated cybersecurity technology.

If Washington responds with sweeping AI safety regulations, OpenAI could also emerge with enormous influence over the rules governing its own industry.

Either way, Altman’s warnings are helping put OpenAI in the room.

And this time, the room belongs to the companies responsible for keeping America’s lights on.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/sam-altman-holds-secret-meetings-us-power-giants-openai-pushes-ai-grid-security/

Blogger Comment: This is what has been really happening for quite a few years now all over the western wprld in particular, but in other nations across the world as well and where it is arson by wealthy vested-interest individuals (Net Zero money making billionaires), Globalist vested-interest organizations (Net Zero side again of the equation that want everyone to think that it is extreme climate change that is causing all these fires to spontaniously happen all at the same time) or even governments themselves that are aligned to the Globalist’s One World Government (OWG) agenda for 2030 and their climate money-making agenda for obvious reasons, that are largely based on just hot air, as the UN are totally aligned with the Globalists with their fictitious global Climate data and not the real truth…driven solely by nothing more than vast money deliver for them through our never-ending taxation that goes into continual $ trillions and basical forever with this capitol fraud on the people…

.

Raging wildfires have torn across Italy’s famed Amalfi Coast, forcing precautionary evacuations, frightening tourists, and prompting local officials to raise suspicions that the blazes were deliberately set as part of a coordinated arson attack.

Firefighters battled flames across the iconic Mediterranean destination after fires erupted Monday evening, threatening areas surrounding Positano, Amalfi, Tovere di Amalfi, and other coastal communities.

Crews worked throughout the night to prevent the flames from reaching homes as strong winds initially prevented helicopters from joining the operation.

No injuries or damage to residential properties were reported.

By morning, firefighting aircraft had joined ground crews as authorities scrambled to contain the flames spreading through scrubland and wooded areas along the Amalfi Coast and Sorrento Peninsula.

Tourists Evacuated as Flames Spread

Italy’s national fire service, Vigili del Fuoco, said emergency crews responded to scrubland fires stretching between Positano, Amalfi, Agerola, and Vico Equense.

Seven ground teams and three aircraft were deployed as part of the operation.

Some restaurants and other facilities in key locations were evacuated as a precaution while the advancing fires caused alarm among tourists staying in one of Italy’s most famous vacation destinations.

The flames ravaged the woods of Tordigliano along the border between the Amalfi Coast and the Sorrento Peninsula, according to Positano Mayor Gabriella Guida.

The fire reached much of the state road, forcing authorities to close it so crews could safely fight the blaze, before flames descended toward Positano.

The fire also threatened mountain hamlets in the Capo d’Acqua area before Montepertuso, between Positano and Santa Maria del Castello.

Mayor Suspects Coordinated Arson

As firefighters fought to bring the emergency under control, Guida raised the possibility that the destruction was not accidental.

The mayor said she believes arson was the likely cause, pointing to fires breaking out at roughly the same time across Vico Equense, Agerola, Amalfi, and Positano.

According to local reports, Guida said the simultaneous outbreaks appeared to indicate a coordinated plan rather than a coincidence.

Authorities had not publicly established arson as the cause of the fires, but local leaders called for anyone with information to come forward.

The potential economic consequences were also becoming apparent as frightened tourists watched flames spread across a destination synonymous with Mediterranean vacations.

Guida acknowledged the impact on visitors who had traveled to the region expecting a relaxing vacation only to find themselves caught near a major wildfire response.

Centuries-Old Trees Destroyed

Beyond the immediate danger from the flames, Guida warned that the destruction of centuries-old trees could leave the area vulnerable to another serious threat once rainfall returns.

The loss of vegetation could trigger significant hydrogeological instability and landslides when the first rains arrive, she warned.

Sorrento Mayor Corrado Fattorusso also condemned the destruction, describing the fires as an attack on the region’s identity, history, and environmental heritage.

Fattorusso called for authorities to move beyond rhetoric by identifying those responsible and implementing concrete measures to monitor the land and prevent future fires.

The warnings underscore the potentially lasting consequences of the blazes in a region where steep mountainsides descend toward densely populated coastal communities.

Firefighters Continue Battle

Emergency crews remained at work into midweek, extinguishing remaining hot spots around the Amalfi Coast and Sorrento Peninsula.

While the operation prevented reported deaths or destruction of homes, the fires left significant environmental damage across one of Italy’s most recognizable landscapes.

Investigators must now determine how the fires started and whether Guida’s suspicions that multiple blazes were deliberately and simultaneously ignited are correct.

For residents and tourists, meanwhile, the immediate focus remains on ensuring that the remaining hot spots are extinguished before strong winds or changing conditions can send the flames racing across the coast again.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/wildfires-tear-across-italys-amalfi-coast-officials-suspect-coordinated-arson/

And,

READ MORE – Another Historic American Church Burns to the Ground as Attacks on Christianity Surge