World Freedom

Blogger Comment: And this is what the United Kingdom is now signing up to and where it has only taken Canada a mere 9-years from 2016 to get to this relatively ‘short’ Point in time, but what do you expect when their Political Leaders (Carney and Trudeau before him) are The World Economic Forum (The WEF) in Davos senior members and where Carney was a Founding member of the WEF Foundation.., and where WEF if you did not know, have been promoting Euthanasia for decades with Bill Gates, another senior WEF member and like his father before him, who was a major player in the USA’s Euthanasia proponents group and son like father really, but seriously worse…and respectfully the world will learn eventually and what is really happening around the world against humanity…

The globalist Canadian government has launched a campaign to promote a new push to begin euthanizing children with mental health issues without their parents’ consent.

The new scheme seeks to open up the country’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) to children.

Liberal Party Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government describes those children who would be eligible for “assisted suicide” using the alarmingly vague term “mature minors.”

According to the Canadian government’s promotional material, children with mental health issues would be euthanized without parental consent under the expanded laws.

The move to expand the eugenics programs to “mature minors” was revealed in flyers distributed by the Canadian government.

Jasmin Laine, the host of “Over Opinionated,” shared the flyers on social media that are being circulated in Manitoba.

In a post on X, Laine wrote:

“You have to be a special kind of demonic to advocate for MAID for young, vulnerable people and people who are suicidal.

“Imagine walking into a clinic for help, and being told the world would be better off without you… that you should cave to the lies the devil on your shoulder is telling you, and it would be more affordable for Canada’s healthcare system if you were gone.”

Laine has herself participated in “recovery plans and treatment after trying to end it” after her partner of ten years committed suicide.

“There is nothing compassionate about this—it is pure evil,” she concluded her post.

The flyers explain that the government of PM Carney, a World Economic Forum (WEF) “agenda contributor,” has recommended that citizens deemed “mature minors” must be allowed to qualify for euthanasia.

“A mature minor is a child or teen who is deemed capable of making a decision for MAiD,” the paper states.

“This would essentially remove the minimum age of eligibility.

“The [government] committee also suggested parents may not be consulted and wouldn’t need to consent to their child’s death via MAiD.”

However, the vagueness of the term “mature” could open up the scheme to children of all ages.

The flyer goes on to argue that, according to the Canadian government, killing children without parental consent is an example of protecting the most vulnerable citizens.

“Children are uniquely vulnerable,” the informational pamphlet says.

“Canada’s first priority must be to provide high-quality medical care for children.”

Spotted in Manitoba. You have to be a special kind of demonic to advocate for MAID for young vulnerable people and people who are suicidal.

Imagine walking into a clinic for help, and being told the world would be better off without you… that you should cave to the lies the… pic.twitter.com/uItvf7aJEn

— Jasmin Laine 🇨🇦 (@JasminLaine_) May 19, 2025

Beginning in March 2027, the government will begin euthanizing Canadians suffering from mental illnesses.

Continuing to bizarrely invert reality, the pamphlet states:

“Hopelessness and a desire to end one’s life can be a symptom of some mental illnesses.”

The flyer continues by promoting suicide as a faster alternative than waiting for medical treatments.

Essentially, the government is advising citizens that suicide is more efficient than the Canadian healthcare system.

“One in 10 people will wait more than 4 months for counselling,” the document reads.

“The waiting period for MAID is only 3 months.

“We are already hearing about people asking for MAID because they do not have the support needed to live.”

The Dying With Dignity Canada (DWDC) website notes that, currently, “Canada’s law on medical assistance in dying (MAiD) requires that applicants must be 18 years of age or older.”

“In many jurisdictions across Canada, mature minors already have the right to make important decisions regarding their healthcare.”

“Dying With Dignity Canada believes mature minors should be allowed the right to choose MAiD,” the site continues.

Next, the website cites a 2023 Ipsos poll claiming that “71% of people across Canada support the ability for mature minors to request and be considered for MAID, if all other criteria are met under the law.”

This troubling push by the Canadian government highlights the anti-human agenda being pushed by the globalist ruling class.

Folow the link for the ‘Source’ of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/canada-begin-euthanizing-children-without-parental-consent/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Government Admits Deaths Surged Among ‘Boosted’ Citizens

Blogger Comment: And this is what the United Kingdom is now signing up to and where it has only taken Canada 9-years from 2016 to get to this relatively ‘short’ Point in time, but what do you expect when their Political Leaders (Carney and Trudeau before him) are The World Economic Forum (The WEF) in Davos senior members and where Carney was a Founding member of the WEF Foundation.., and where WEF if you did not know, have been promoting Euthanasia for decades with Bill Gates, another senior WEF member and like his father before him, who was a major player in the USA’s Euthanasia proponents group and son like father really, but seriously worse…and respectfully the world will learn eventually and what is really happening around the world against humanity…

Canada’s liberal government is refusing to rule out plans to begin euthanizing children who have been diagnosed with autism.

It comes as the globalist Canadian government seeks to expand its radical “assisted suicide” laws to include “mature minors” with mental health issues.

Canada’s liberal government is once again raising global eyebrows with the nation’s “Medical Assistance in Dying” (MAiD) program

This time, the government of Prime Minister Mark Carney is using taxpayer money to fund research discussing whether children with severe autism should qualify for euthanasia under the country’s increasingly radical assisted-death laws.

Documents recently obtained by Rebel News reveal that Health Canada has allocated over half a million dollars—$549,068—to Dalhousie University for a four-year study focused on “youth views” regarding euthanasia, palliative care, and MAiD.

The project, cloaked in progressive language, appears to open the door to what critics fear is a slippery slope: the potential state-sanctioned killing of vulnerable children.

One internal email from a Health Canada official in the Indigenous End-of-Life Care team, Heather Davids, directly asks bureaucrats Ian Gillies and Richard Martin:

“How should the department respond to public correspondence about whether severe autism meets the eligibility criteria for MAiD?”

A troubling draft reply, later removed from final versions, read:

“Your position will be carefully considered as the government advances with MAiD legislation.”

The message stops short of endorsing euthanasia for autistic children.

However, it reflects growing concerns among Canadians—and human rights advocates worldwide—that the Canadian government is willing to entertain such dangerous ideas.

Since 2021, the Liberal Party administration has aggressively expanded MAiD access, even passing Bill C-7 to allow those suffering solely from mental illness to apply starting in 2027.

The consequences are already severe.

According to Health Canada’s own numbers, MAiD ranked as the sixth leading cause of death in the country in 2022.

A staggering 13,241 Canadians died via lethal injection that year, up 31.2% from 2021, despite many not being terminally ill.

Critics argue this expansion targets the mentally ill, disabled, and increasingly the young—those most in need of protection, not a state-approved death.

The Conservative Party has repeatedly attempted to halt this moral freefall.

Conservatives introduced Bill C-314, which sought to derail the Left’s eugenics agenda.

However, these efforts have been blocked by the ruling Liberal Party’s allies.

Despite warnings from ethicists and disability advocates, the government continues to push the envelope.

The Canadian government is showing little regard for the sanctity of life or the basic protections owed to its most vulnerable citizens.

As Canada edges further down this disturbing path, many on the right are calling for urgent action to expose and stop what they see as a growing culture of state-sponsored death masquerading as “compassion.”

It comes as the Canadian government has launched a campaign to promote a new push to begin euthanizing children with mental health issues without their parents’ consent.

The new scheme seeks to open up the country’s MAiD program to children.

Carney’s government describes those children who would be eligible for “assisted suicide” using the alarmingly vague term “mature minors.”

According to the Canadian government’s promotional material, children with mental health issues would be euthanized without parental consent under the expanded laws.

The move to expand the eugenics programs to “mature minors” was revealed in flyers distributed by the Canadian government.

The flyers explain that the government of PM Carney, a World Economic Forum (WEF) “agenda contributor,” has recommended that citizens deemed “mature minors” must be allowed to qualify for euthanasia.

“A mature minor is a child or teen who is deemed capable of making a decision for MAiD,” the paper states.

“This would essentially remove the minimum age of eligibility.

“The [government] committee also suggested parents may not be consulted and wouldn’t need to consent to their child’s death via MAiD.”

However, the vagueness of the term “mature” could open up the scheme to children of all ages.

The flyer goes on to argue that, according to the Canadian government, killing children without parental consent is an example of protecting the most vulnerable citizens.

“Children are uniquely vulnerable,” the informational pamphlet says.

“Canada’s first priority must be to provide high-quality medical care for children.”

Follow the link for the ‘Source’ of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-government-refuses-to-rule-out-euthanizing-autistic-children/

And,

READ MORE – Canada Moves to Begin Euthanizing Children Without Parental Consent

Bloggers Comment: And this is what the United Kingdom is now signing up to and where it has only taken Canada 9-years from 2016 to get to this relatively ‘short’ Point in time, but what do you expect when their Political Leaders (Carney and Trudeau before him) are The World Economic Forum (The WEF) in Davos senior members and where Carney was a Founding member of the WEF Foundation.., and where WEF if you did not know, have been promoting Euthanasia for decades with Bill Gates, another senior WEF member and like his father before him, who was a major player in the USA’s Euthanasia proponents group and son like father really, but seriously worse…and respectfully the world will learn eventually and what is really happening around the world against humanity…

The liberal Canadian government is advancing plans to update the country’s “assisted suicide” laws to allow authorities to euthanize children without the need for parental consent.

Assisted suicide and euthanasia have become rapidly accepted in Canada.

The government has continued to lift restrictions on its Medical Aid in Dying (MAiD) program.

Initially, it was introduced to give people who were terminally ill an option to prevent then from dying a slow painful death.

Over time, however, the laws have become more relaxed.

Canadians can now apply for euthanasia for a variety of reasons, including minor illnesses or being too poor or homeless.

But there are still efforts to expand it even further.

A new government report on MAiD was recently presented to Parliament.

The report urges the inclusion of minors in the eligibility for physician-assisted death — without parental consent.

The Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying presented its latest report last week, which included a recommendation that minors be able to request MAiD.

“For MAID and mature minors, the committee heard a mix of views about whether MAID should be available to those under the age of 18,” the report read.

“Many witnesses believed that age alone does not determine whether someone is capable of consenting to MAID. At the same time, a cautious approach was recommended, especially since there is little evidence from youth themselves on this topic.

“Most witnesses agreed that if MAID for mature minors were allowed, it should only be under track one (reasonably foreseeable natural death).

“The committee recommends that mature minors should have access to MAID under track one.

“The committee also recommends that youth be consulted on the topic of MAID and mature minors.”

The committee then made the recommendation that Canada should begin, within five years, funding research and consulting “with minors on the topic of MAID, including minors with terminal illnesses, minors with disabilities, minors in the child welfare system and Indigenous minors.”

Additionally, the report recommended that minors be able to be euthanized, even if their parent doesn’t approve:

That the Government of Canada establish a requirement that, where appropriate, the parents or guardians of a mature minor be consulted in the course of the assessment process for MAID, but that the will of a minor who is found to have the requisite decision-making capacity ultimately takes priority.

The report had the backing of Liberal, NDP, and Bloc-Quebecois members of the committee, though a dissenting opinion from conservatives was also included.

They argued that “it would be irresponsible for the Liberal government to move ahead with any expansion of MAID for mature minors,” and said they do not support this further expansion.

“The Liberals’ rushed and reckless approach to Canada’s MAID regime has put the lives of vulnerable Canadians at risk,” the dissenting opinion said.

“We caution the Liberal government against repeating the mistakes they made concerning MAID MD-SUMC.

“MAID policy must be grounded in evidence, consultation with impacted groups, and with serious consideration given to protecting the vulnerable.”

And,

Follow the link for the ‘Source’ of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/canada-advances-plan-euthanize-children-without-parental-consent/

And,

READ MORE: Canada’s Government-Run Healthcare Is Euthanizing Sick & Poor People

A groundbreaking new study has confirmed that toxic ingredients in “vaccines” cause inflammation and brainstem dysfunction, which trigger Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) in sleeping babies.

The study, recently published in the International Journal of Medical Sciences, is raising major concerns about the safety of early-life vaccinations for a small but potentially vulnerable group of infants.

According to the researchers, underdeveloped liver enzyme systems may hinder some babies from effectively processing “vaccine” ingredients, leading to sudden death.

The peer-reviewed study focused on cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes — a family of enzymes primarily located in the liver, essential for drug metabolism.

The authors reviewed genetic and pharmacological literature to assess how variability in these enzymes may affect how infants metabolize vaccine excipients — substances typically considered “inactive” ingredients, such as preservatives or stabilizers.

“It is generally believed that excipients… are present in such trace amounts that they don’t affect how the body metabolizes a vaccine,” the study notes.

However, the researchers say this assumption may not apply universally.

With modern vaccine schedules requiring multiple complex formulations early in life, the authors caution that children with compromised or immature enzyme pathways may not be able to safely eliminate even trace amounts of certain additives.

Renowned McCullough Foundation epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, who first reported the study, said of the findings:

“The result is a biologically plausible mechanism linking early-life vaccination to sudden infant death, particularly in those with genetic or developmental vulnerabilities.”

Past research on SIDS has identified abnormalities in the brainstem and medulla, areas that control vital functions like breathing and heart rate.

The study suggests these irregularities could stem from inflammation or infection, possibly worsened by prolonged exposure to vaccine ingredients in children with impaired metabolic clearance.

This study adds to a growing body of literature calling for a reassessment of one-size-fits-all vaccine protocols, particularly in infants whose ability to process pharmaceutical compounds remains underdeveloped.

It also comes amid a swelling body of evidence linking “vaccines” to SIDS.

As Slay News reported last month, an explosive study confirmed that the vast majority of SIDS cases occur within the first week following routine childhood vaccinations.

The study analyzed official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

Statistics from the VAERS database were combined with peer-reviewed research for a groundbreaking new analysis.

Alarmingly, the study found that a staggering 78 percent of SIDS deaths occur within 7 days of the “vaccines.”

Shockingly, 58% of sudden infant deaths occurred within just three days of the injections.

In addition, two days post-vaccination shows a 69-fold increase in deaths compared to baseline expectations.

The findings were confirmed in six separate peer-reviewed studies.

Dr. Paul Thomas, a board-certified fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics and a diplomat of the American Board of Addiction Medicine, highlighted the findings during a recent interview with Children’s Health Defense, the nonprofit founded by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

“These vaccines are killing infants,” said Thomas, the author of Vax Facts.

“You took a healthy baby into the office, and they got a series of vaccines, and then you find them dead.

“The most deaths happen on the first day [post-vaccination] – Day zero.

“Then the next most common death day is day two. And then day three.”

“In my book, Vax Facts, the chapter on SIDS makes it really clear,” Thomas notes.

“If you look at the six studies that were well done that compared infant death to when they got their vaccines, and in the infant period, the TDAP is one of those really worrisome ones, 78%, if you put all six studies together, happened in the first week after the vaccine.”

WATCH: Click on the link below the image to view…

78% of Sudden Infant Deaths Occur Within Days of ‘Vaccines,’ Study Finds

While the study found that 78% of SIDS cases occurred within 7 days of vaccination, other data linked far more sudden infant deaths to vaccines over longer periods.

In a separate interview with CHD in April, Dr. Paul revealed that a staggering 97% of all sudden infant deaths happen within ten days of the child being vaccinated.

Follow the link for the ‘Source’ of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/vaccines-cause-sudden-infant-death-syndrome-triggering-brainstem-dysfunction-study-finds/

And,

READ MORE – World Council for Health Warns Covid-Vaxxed Face ‘Ticking Time Bomb’ of Mass Deaths

In a major policy reversal, the Australian government has finally admitted that mRNA “vaccines” are more harmful to healthy young people than the COVID-19 virus itself.

In a quietly released but momentous update, the Australian government has officially reversed its Covid “vaccination” policy for children and teens.

The government is now stating that healthy individuals under 18 should not receive the mRNA injection, citing potential risks that outweigh any alleged benefit.

According to the Australian Department of Health, as of June 3, 2025:

“COVID-19 vaccine is not recommended for healthy infants, children, or adolescents who do not have medical conditions that increase their risk of severe illness.”

The advisory goes further, explaining that because of the “extremely low” risk of serious Covid illness in healthy children:

“The benefits of vaccination are not considered to outweigh the potential harms.”

This major revision comes from the Australian Immunisation Handbook, based on recommendations from the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) and other national health experts.

The policy marks a sharp shift from earlier campaigns that promoted universal “vaccination,” including for children, across Australia.

The decision comes amid rising international scrutiny over adverse events tied to mRNA Covid “vaccines.”

Around the world, heart damage, cancers, strokes, sudden deaths, and other deadly disorders have been surging among the “vaccinated,” especially in younger age groups.

The timing of Australia’s announcement is significant: it closely follows remarks by the U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Kennedy confirmed the removal of the Covid shot from the CDC’s recommended schedule for healthy children and pregnant women, citing a:

“Lack of any clinical data to support the repeat booster strategy in children.”

Public health experts are also reevaluating adverse event reporting.

While CDC data lists 38,615 deaths associated with the Covid injections since 2020, a Harvard study funded by HHS in 2010 suggested that fewer than 1% of adverse events are ever reported.

The scale of unreporting implies that actual numbers could be significantly higher.

In early vaccine rollout documents, Pfizer’s own data disclosed over 1,200 adverse outcomes linked to its mRNA product.

Meanwhile, concerns about the harms of the shots outweighing any alleged benefits have been spreading around the world.

As Slay News reported in March, a group of leading scientists in Germany raised the alarm after discovering evidence buried in the German government’s official data that confirms excess deaths were caused by mRNA “vaccines” and not Covid.

The bombshell study provides yet further confirmation that excess mortality rates did not rise during the first waves of the pandemic, despite official claims of surging “Covid deaths.”

Excess mortality rates did skyrocket, however, but only after the Covid mRNA “vaccines” were rolled out for the public.

Interestingly, the study found that the most significant excess mortality event during the pandemic period was not caused by Covid at all but by a late 2022 influenza wave.

Excess deaths spiked due to people dying from the flu after they received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

With health officials in Australia and the United States now pulling back from mass Covid shots for low-risk populations, the shift signals a broader international recalibration.

The shift is perhaps overdue recognition of medical concerns that were long raised by leading experts, independent researchers, and vaccine-injured families alike.

Follow the link for the ‘Source’ of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/australian-government-admits-vaccines-more-harmful-covid/

And,

READ MORE – Global Study: Covid Caused Zero Excess Deaths, mRNA Shots Caused Millions

Democrat-aligned activist U.S. District Judge James Boasberg has ruled that illegal aliens deported by President Donald Trump can file legal challenges against their removals.

Boasberg, an Obama appointee, issued a sweeping order Wednesday.

The order compels the Trump administration to allow deported illegal aliens, most of whom were violent criminals and dangerous gang members, to challenge their removal in court.

“In short, the Government must facilitate the Class’s ability to seek habeas relief to contest their removal under the Act,” Boasberg wrote.

He continued by conceding that what this will look like in practice remains undecided.

The ruling stems from the administration’s use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act.

The law allows the U.S. to remove foreign nationals from hostile countries.

The Alien Enemies Act had been used to deport hundreds of illegal alien criminals directly to CECOT, El Salvador’s maximum-security prison.

Many of those deported to the prison were tied to MS-13 and Tren de Aragua, two violent street gangs designated as terrorist organizations.

Boasberg openly referenced Franz Kafka’s 1925 book “The Trial” in his ruling.

The activist judge portrays the deported individuals as victims of bureaucratic injustice:

“Such was the situation into which Frengel Reyes Mota, Andry Jose Hernandez Romero, and scores of other Venezuelan noncitizens say they were plunged on March 15, 2025.”

The ruling includes Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an MS-13 member who was deported to his native El Salvador.

Garcia was also known to U.S. authorities as a human trafficker and domestic abuser.

Boasberg, who previously accused the Trump administration of being in “willful disregard” of court orders, emphasized the lack of due process for those removed:

“Defendants plainly deprived these individuals of their right to seek habeas relief before their summary removal from the United States.”

While acknowledging the Trump administration might have correctly invoked the law and that some deportees might be gang members, Boasberg stated:

“But — and this is the critical point — there is simply no way to know for sure, as the CECOT Plaintiffs never had any opportunity to challenge the government’s say-so.”

Boasberg has repeatedly clashed with the administration.

The Obama-appointed judge has issued restraining orders and even demanded a deportation flight be reversed—a demand that went unmet.

His decision is likely to ignite new legal and political battles, especially as it potentially grants violent foreign nationals a path back into U.S. courtrooms.

Follow the link for the ‘Source’ of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/activist-judge-boasberg-rules-illegal-aliens-deported-trump-challenge-removals/

And,

READ MORE – Activist Judge in California Blocks Trump Admin Terminating Immigration Documents of 5,000 Venezuelan Nationals

President Donald Trump is drawing a hard line on the issue of male athletes competing in girls’ sports.

The president is now threatening “large-scale fines” and a loss of federal funding for California over the issue.

“A Biological Male competed in California Girls State Finals, WINNING BIG, despite the fact that they were warned by me not to do so,” Trump said in a post in Truth Social.

“As Governor Gavin Newscum fully understands, large-scale fines will be imposed!!!”

The threat comes after a male athlete took home multiple medals at the 2025 CIF State Girls Track and Field Championships.

As Slay News reported, AB Hernandez, a biological male claiming to be a “transgender female,” earned two state titles and a second-place finish in top-tier girls’ events.

Hernandez’s “victory” is prompting immediate backlash and renewed debate over fairness in women’s sports.

“Allowing biological men to play in women’s sports is “NOT FAIR, AND TOTALLY DEMEANING TO WOMEN AND GIRLS,” Trump posted on Truth Social last week.

Trump further stated that he ordered local authorities to bar Hernandez from competing, warning California Governor Gavin Newsom that federal education funds could be withheld if the state refused to follow through.

Despite the warning, the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) allowed Hernandez to compete.

However, the CIF introduced a controversial bylaw as a compromise.

“CIF Bylaw 300.D” asserted that the real female runner-up also received a first-place medal in Hernandez’s events.

Nevertheless, the competition drew protests and media scrutiny.

Supporters praised Hernandez’s resilience, while opponents condemned the outcome as a betrayal of girls’ sports.

“It’s completely unfair to these girls,” said one protester.

“They’ve worked hard, and now they have to compete against a male.

“It’s demoralizing and wrong.”

“He has an advantage by being a male, and it’s really unfortunate that these girls, the psychological effect that it has on them and places on them, when they know they’re not only competing against people of their own sex, but now they gotta go up against a man,” the protester added.

“I think it’s really bad that we’re setting this precedent,” he finished.

Hernandez’s mother, speaking to the Los Angeles Times, expressed pride in her son following his “win” in girls’ sports.

In a major legal escalation, Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division issued a statement calling CIF Bylaw 300.D unconstitutional.

The DOJ argues the policy “knowingly deprives female students of athletic opportunities and benefits on the basis of their sex,” thus violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Dhillon set a June 9 deadline for California public school districts to certify in writing that they will not implement Bylaw 300.D, or risk losing federal support.

The Biden-era leniency on transgender sports policies may be reaching a breaking point following Trump’s return to the White House.

Trump and federal authorities are signaling a zero-tolerance policy on what many conservatives see as ideological overreach that harms girls and undermines Title IX protections.

Follow the link for the ‘Source’ of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/trump-threatens-california-large-scale-fines-male-winning-girls-state-finals/

And,

READ MORE – Leaked Medical Report Proves ‘Female’ Olympic Gold Boxer Imane Khelif Is a Man

President Donald Trump is calling for a full investigation into whether Joe Biden’s aides conspired to deceive the public and illegally exercised presidential authority through the use of an autopen.

Trump has ordered U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate whether those aides were concealing Biden’s severe cognitive decline from the American people.

In a formal memo ordering the probe on Wednesday, Trump declared:

“This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history.

“The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power.”

According to Trump, presidential signatures — with the power to make laws, appoint judges, issue pardons, and direct national policy — were routinely affixed to over 1,200 executive documents, even as Biden’s mental state deteriorated.

“It has become increasingly apparent that former President Biden’s aides abused the power of Presidential signatures… to conceal Biden’s cognitive decline,” Trump stated.

Trump continued by citing Biden’s “serious cognitive decline” and claiming it was “even ‘worse’ in private.”

The president pointed to troubling examples, including the Christmas 2024 commutation of 37 violent federal death row inmates.

Those inmates included mass murderers and child killers.

The controversial order was executed via autopen.

“There are serious doubts as to the decision-making process and even the degree of Biden’s awareness,” Trump warned.

He added that the use of the autopen in the second half of Biden’s presidency may have masked his inability to carry out his constitutional duties.

The memo demands that AG Bondi lead a probe into whether Biden’s advisors orchestrated a cover-up.

These actions could include directing fake video production or issuing false public statements about Biden’s mental state.

Trump also suggests Biden may not have supported many of his own border security policies.

Those policies fueled the ongoing immigration crisis.

Instead, Trump says radical actors within the White House pushed these directives through using the mechanical signature tool.

“If his advisors secretly used the mechanical signature pen… while taking radical executive actions all in his name, that would constitute an unconstitutional wielding of the power of the Presidency,” Trump wrote.

House Republicans, led by Oversight Chair James Comer (R-KY), have launched their own investigation and are reportedly open to calling Biden to testify.

In a statement, Biden dismissed the accusations as political theater, saying:

“Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency.

“I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations.

“Any suggestion that I didn’t [make the decisions] is ridiculous and false…

“This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans.”

The statement from “Biden” was sent to corporate media outlets, and he has not made these remarks in public.

Follow the link for the ‘Source’ of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/trump-orders-ag-pam-bondi-investigate-bidens-autopen-use-aides-abused-power-presidential-signatures/

And,

READ MORE – Trump Suggests Biden Was ‘Executed in 2020,’ Replaced by ‘Clone’

A Chinese scholar has been arrested after she was caught trying to smuggle a biological pathogen into the United States to be used for an “agricultural terrorism” attack.

Yunqing Jian, a visiting scholar at the University of Michigan, was arrested and charged with attempting to smuggle a highly dangerous biological pathogen into the United States.

The fungus is capable of crippling U.S. agriculture and posing serious threats to human and animal health, federal prosecutors revealed this week.

According to documents unsealed Tuesday in federal court, Jian, a researcher originally from China, and her boyfriend, Zunyong Liu, face federal charges after attempting to bring Fusarium graminearum into the U.S. last July.

The fungus that devastates staple crops like wheat, rice, barley, and corn.

“These two aliens have been charged with smuggling a fungus that has been described as a ‘potential agroterrorism weapon’ into the heartland of America,” said U.S. Attorney Jerome F. Gorgon, Jr., warning of the “gravest national security concerns.”

“They apparently intended to use a University of Michigan laboratory to further their scheme,” he added, identifying at least one of the suspects as a loyal member of the Chinese Communist Party.

The dangerous fungus, which causes “head blight” in crops, is known to be responsible for billions in global agricultural losses annually.

According to federal prosecutors, it can also cause vomiting, liver damage, and reproductive defects in both humans and livestock.

Liu, Jian’s boyfriend, was intercepted by Customs and Border Protection officers at Detroit Metropolitan Airport, carrying the pathogen into the U.S.

When first questioned, he lied to officers about the reason for his visit and denied any knowledge of the substance.

But under pressure, he confessed.

“Ultimately, Liu admitted to smuggling the pathogen and stated that he brought the pathogen into the United States so that he could conduct research on it at a laboratory at the University of Michigan where his girlfriend, Jian, worked,” wrote an FBI special agent in the criminal filing.

Federal officials say Jian, who earned a Ph.D. in plant pathogens from Zhejiang University in China, was funded by a Chinese government-linked foundation to conduct post-doctoral research specifically on the Fusarium fungus.

She is set to appear in court Tuesday afternoon.

Disturbingly, this case marks the second criminal complaint in just one week involving a Chinese national at the University of Michigan.

Last Friday, federal prosecutors revealed a Chinese student had illegally voted in the 2024 U.S. election.

The student, in the U.S. on a valid visa, managed to obtain and cast a ballot in early voting last October before fleeing back to China.

The Trump administration reacted swiftly, announcing a crackdown on Chinese student visas and influence in U.S. universities.

“We will not tolerate the [Chinese Communist Party’s] exploitation of U.S. universities or theft of U.S. research intellectual property or technologies to grow its military power, conduct intelligence collection or repress voices of opposition,” a White House statement said.

The administration also pledged to “aggressively revoke” student visas connected to foreign espionage or anti-American activity.

As concerns mount over the Chinese Communist Party’s infiltration of American institutions, from universities to elections, the University of Michigan appears to be emerging as a recurring weak point in U.S. homeland security.

With agroterrorism threats now in play, critics argue it’s long past time for a full federal audit of foreign nationals operating in sensitive academic research.

Follow the link for the ‘Source’ of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/chinese-scholar-arrested-smuggling-pathogen-us-agricultural-terrorism/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-newsletter

And,

READ MORE – U.S Citizen Sentenced to 10 Years in Prison for Joining ISIS in Syria

The Supreme Court declined to take up a case on Maryland’s AR-15 ban, allowing the state’s Democrat leaders to continue throttling the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding American citizens.

The court’s denial raised objections from Justice Clarence Thomas.

Thomas said he “would not wait to decide” a question “of critical importance to tens of millions of law-abiding AR-15 owners.”

Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch also said they would have taken the case.

However, four votes were needed to take up the issue.

In a brief opinion, Justice Brett Kavanaugh said it is not necessary for the Supreme Court to get involved while lower courts continue to develop the case.

The Supreme Court has largely avoided altering the legal landscape on guns since its landmark decision three years ago in Bruen.

The case imposed a new historical test that made it significantly harder to regulate firearms.

But Kavanaugh predicted that the Supreme Court would likely decide the AR-15 issue in the next year or two.

“Opinions from other Courts of Appeals should assist this Court’s ultimate decision-making on the AR-15 issue,” he wrote.

“Additional petitions for certiorari will likely be before this Court shortly, and, in my view, this Court should and presumably will address the AR-15 issue soon, in the next Term or two.”

In a fiery dissent, Justice Thomas argued that AR-15s are “clearly ‘Arms’ under the Second Amendment’s plain text.”

He chastised the court for waiting to decide a matter of “critical importance.”

“I would not wait to decide whether the government can ban the most popular rifle in America,” Justice Thomas wrote.

“The question is of critical importance to tens of millions of law-abiding AR-15 owners throughout the country.”

The AR-15 is the most popular rifle in the U.S. and is arguably the most iconic firearm in the world.

The gun control lobby has long sought to paint the AR-15 as a “weapon of war” unfit for civilian use.

However, AR-15s have never been used on the battlefield, and millions of Americans use the rifles for lawful purposes without incident.

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals repeated the “weapon of war” talking point in its 2024 ruling upholding Maryland’s ban.

The court held that AR-15s are “military-style weapons designed for sustained combat operations that are ill-suited and disproportionate to the need for self-defense.”

Kavanaugh called the appeals court’s decision “questionable,” suggesting he could help overturn it in the future.

“Given that millions of Americans own AR-15s and that a significant majority of the States allow possession of those rifles, petitioners have a strong argument that AR-15s are in ‘common use’ by law-abiding citizens and therefore are protected by the Second Amendment under Heller,” he wrote.

Follow the link for the Source of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/supreme-court-allows-maryland-democrats-enforce-ar-15-ban/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-newsletter

And,

READ MORE – Federal Court: Flu Vaccines Cause Guillain-Barré Syndrome