World Freedom

A group of scientists has just issued an explosive warning after discovering the presence of “magnetic nanoparticles,” which penetrate the brain and “manipulate thoughts,” in the bodies of people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

Alarmingly, the scientists also link the nanoparticles to surges in “turco cancer,” prion diseases, and sudden deaths.

The study was led by Dr. John W. Oller Jr. of the University of New Mexico, and Okinawa Christian University’s Professor Daniel Santiago and Dr. Daniel Broudy.

Their paper was published in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science.

The experts are raising alarms about a terrifying possibility that Covid mRNA “vaccines” may enable brain-targeted “mind-control” interfaces.

This bombshell review argues that magnetic elements found in the “vaccines” could be part of a biotechnological delivery method called “magnetofection,” a concept linked to DARPA’s research into mind-control interfaces.

The study, released in July 2025, exposes how previously unnoticed magnetic nanoparticles could be used for deeply intrusive purposes, including the theoretical development of “brain-targeted” technologies capable of controlling human thoughts and actions.

This raises disturbing questions about the true intentions behind the rapid deployment of mRNA “vaccines” and their long-term implications on personal freedom.

The Alarming Evidence of Magnetofection

The authors of the review analyze data from multiple studies, including a pivotal 2024 ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry) study by Diblasi et al.

This study found 55 undeclared elements, including ferromagnetic metals like iron, nickel, cobalt, and rare earth metals such as gadolinium and lanthanum, in Pfizer and Moderna mRNA “vaccine” vials.

The review highlights how these elements could be used for magnetofection, a delivery method designed to use magnetic nanoparticles to penetrate cellular and even neurological barriers.

These findings starkly contrast with statements from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC).

The CDC has denied the presence of magnetic components in mRNA injections.

As the study points out, there are glaring discrepancies between what the public has been told and the scientific evidence now surfacing about the actual contents of these vaccines.

DARPA’s Mind-Control Capabilities and Vaccine Technology

What’s even more disturbing is the link between this new research and prior DARPA-funded projects on brain interfaces.

The review cites over 60 peer-reviewed publications discussing the use of magnetic nanoparticles for neuromodulation, which is a technique for manipulating brain activity.

According to the authors, the same technology DARPA has researched could now be present in the mRNA vaccines, offering a possible explanation for the unexpected neurological side effects seen in some vaccine recipients.

DARPA’s research into non-surgical brain interfaces and mind-control technologies has long been controversial.

The idea that vaccine ingredients could be designed to tap into this research raises the possibility that the government and pharmaceutical companies could be experimenting with invasive neurological technologies under the guise of public health.

Concerning Findings: Evidence of Post-Vaccine Adverse Effects

The study also points to previous reports of bodily magnetism in vaccinated individuals, with several claims documenting people who have exhibited unusual magnetic properties after receiving the vaccine.

Coupled with reports of strange and devastating post-vaccine side effects such as “turbo cancer,” prion diseases, and sudden deaths, the review raises the question of whether these adverse events could be linked to the magnetic properties of the nanoparticles in the shots.

The authors argue that the CDC and other public health agencies have misled the public by denying the presence of ferromagnetic and paramagnetic elements in the jabs.

They believe that this failure to disclose the full truth about the contents of the injections may be a deliberate attempt to hide the potential for neurological manipulation.

What’s at Stake: The Need for Transparency and Accountability

This latest study adds fuel to the fire of concerns about the unregulated use of advanced technologies in public health initiatives.

Paired with this new evidence, the rapid rollout of mRNA “vaccines” raises serious questions about the transparency, accountability, and ethical implications of such high-risk biological experimentation.

While some may dismiss the idea of mind-control capabilities as a conspiracy theory, the potential applications of magnetofection are too significant to ignore.

If these nanoparticles can reach and affect the brain, they could be used not only for medical purposes but also for far more sinister applications, including behavioral modification and thought control.

Conclusion: A Wake-Up Call for Safety and Oversight

As governments and pharmaceutical companies push forward with more widespread use of mRNA “vaccines,” the public deserves answers.

The review calls for immediate, independent forensic analysis of vaccine contents and robust regulatory oversight to ensure that these technologies do not become tools of mass control.

The unsettling possibility that mRNA shots may contain materials designed for neurological manipulation is not something that can be dismissed lightly.

With the risks of potential abuse on such a large scale, it’s more crucial than ever to demand transparency, rigorous safety testing, and a pause in the unchecked use of these technologies.

The question now is whether the scientific community and government agencies will take these warnings seriously.

Will they prioritize the health and freedoms of the public, or continue pushing forward with their untested, and potentially dangerous, experiments?

The future of individual rights and autonomy may depend on the answer.

Click on the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/scientists-sound-alarm-magnetic-nanoparticles-covid-vaccines/

And,

READ MORE – Major Study: mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Permanently Destroy Eye Cells

A former green agenda activist who was part of Greta Thunberg’s inner circle has blown the whistle to expose the entire “climate change” movement as a “scam.”

A decade ago, Lucy Biggers was a rising star in the “climate crisis” movement.

Biggers was a self-described “sustainability influencer” working for progressive media outlet NowThis Entertainment.

She pushed the green agenda to millions of young Americans.

Today, she’s calling it what she believes it really is: a scam built on fear, guilt, and anti-human ideology.

In a striking reversal, Biggers is now publicly dismantling the very movement she once championed.

She is warning that the “global warming” narrative is weaponized not to protect the planet, but to control people, demonize Western prosperity, and undermine national sovereignty, all under the banner of “saving the Earth.”

“I had so much guilt and shame for being a modern human,” Biggers told Just the News, describing how the climate movement distorted her worldview.

“I didn’t want to pass that guilt and shame on to my son.”

However, Biggers’ transformation didn’t happen overnight.

In her twenties, she fully embraced the climate orthodoxy, producing viral videos for NowThis that praised “sustainable” lifestyles, condemned fossil fuels, and elevated far-left voices like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Greta Thunberg.

One of her videos, a dramatized clip supporting Standing Rock pipeline protests, racked up over 17 million views online.

She even traveled to the protest site and interviewed climate activist celebrities.

Her work earned praise from “environmentalist” groups and cemented her image as a voice for the “climate” agenda.

But the deeper she got, the more cracks she saw.

It was during the Covid lockdowns, when the global economy was forcibly shut down, that Biggers began asking dangerous questions.

Despite the world grinding to a halt, “carbon emissions” barely budged.

The green utopia she had envisioned looked less like progress and more like a dystopia.

“If we have to shut down the entire world and emissions go down only a little, what does the climate movement want us to do?” she asked.

“Would I want to live in that world?”

After leaving NowThis in 2020, Biggers took time to reflect.

The birth of her son was a turning point.

She realized she didn’t want to raise a child under a worldview that taught him to be ashamed of modern life, technology, prosperity, or the very energy that makes civilization possible.

In 2024, she published a piece in The Free Press titled “Losing My Religion,” outlining how the climate movement had become a secular cult, complete with its own rituals of guilt, shame, and submission.

The piece struck a chord.

Soon, Biggers was posting videos on TikTok and X, calling the climate movement a “scam” and warning others to stop living in fear.

Unsurprisingly, the backlash from the Left was swift and vicious.

Biggers was smeared as a “sellout,” accused of being paid by oil companies, and even mocked by the same activists who once cheered her work.

Notably, Gasland director Josh Fox, whose infamous anti-fracking documentary was widely debunked, falsely claimed credit for Biggers’ old videos and dismissed her change of heart as irrelevant.

But few critics addressed her actual arguments.

“Do fossil fuels cause our planet to warm? Yes,” Biggers wrote.

“But they also make modern life possible… something that the ‘keep it in the ground’ climate activists never acknowledge.”

“Renewables are not ready.

“And they have their own environmental costs.”

Biggers’ story isn’t just a personal journey; it’s an indictment of a broader agenda.

What began as genuine concern for the environment has morphed into an international movement increasingly obsessed with central planning, forced austerity, and population control.

Her videos, now posted across Instagram and X, don’t just challenge climate orthodoxy.

They challenge the very foundation of the globalist green agenda: that the West must abandon its wealth, its energy independence, and its individual freedoms for the sake of the planet.

“You’re so empathetic to everybody else’s problems that you don’t prioritize yourself,” Biggers said.

“You start to just feel guilty for being alive.”

Biggers has now joined a growing number of climate dissidents, scientists, and former insiders warning that the movement is no longer about science, it’s about power.

A global reset dressed up in green.

Her message to young people is clear: You don’t have to carry the weight of manufactured guilt.

You don’t have to fear the future.

And you don’t have to sacrifice human flourishing at the altar of carbon credits and solar subsidies.

As Biggers now says, from experience, the “climate change” movement is not saving the planet.

It is, however, taking aim at the freedoms that made the modern world possible.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/greta-thunberg-insider-blows-whistle-climate-change-is-a-scam/

And,

READ MORE – Scientists Sound Alarm After Detecting Mysterious Radio Waves Coming from Beneath Antarctica Ice

Alarming official data in Europe has revealed that a devastating drop in birth rates is only impacting women who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

A growing body of data is fueling alarm after researchers uncovered a steep and unexplained drop in birth rates across Europe.

The evidence reveals a powerful direct correlation between the rollout of Covid injections and severely declining fertility.

In the Czech Republic, birth rates began plunging sharply in January 2022.

By the end of the year, it became undeniable: the country’s total fertility rate (TFR) had collapsed.

Worryingly, the data shows that birth rates continued plummeting through 2024.

And it wasn’t just in the Czech Republic.

Similar patterns were observed in the Netherlands, Norway, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Sweden, all countries that had aggressively promoted mass Covid “vaccination” campaigns.

What sets the Czech data apart is that it now includes an unprecedented official breakdown of births by the mother’s “vaccination” status.

Released only after repeated Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and political pressure, the data provides the clearest view yet into what happened.

According to the figures, women who had received at least one Covid “vaccine” dose prior to giving birth conceived about one-third fewer children than would be expected based on their share of the population.

Unvaccinated women, by contrast, conceived at rates consistent with pre-pandemic trends.

The trend coincided almost precisely with the timeline of mass Covid vaccination campaigns.

Despite claims that the drop in fertility was due to demographics, the TFR, a measure that corrects for age and population, dropped sharply only after widespread “vaccine” rollout.

Even more striking, the data reveals that “vaccinated” women who became pregnant during or after vaccination saw disproportionately lower conception rates, suggesting a biological or environmental factor may be at play.

While critics of the official narrative have long raised concerns about the unknown effects of mRNA “vaccines” on fertility, this newly released dataset appears to back their warnings with hard numbers.

The Czech data is now publicly available and includes a breakdown by month and vaccination status for women aged 18–39.

The findings raise serious questions:

Why did the fertility rate only fall among vaccinated women?

Why did the timing align so closely with vaccine rollout?

If the vaccines were unrelated, why did the TFR across entire countries drop so suddenly and dramatically, and continue falling?

Meanwhile, corporate media and government health officials have largely ignored or downplayed the data.

Explanations pointing to stress, demographics, or even war in Ukraine fail to account for the timing and specificity of the decline, which overwhelmingly affected only the “vaccinated.”

Data from other European countries echoes the Czech findings.

Sweden, Slovakia, and the Netherlands all saw their fertility rates take sharp downturns in 2022.

In contrast, countries with lower vaccine uptake or delayed rollouts saw more stable trends.

Despite repeated attempts, researchers have been denied access to more granular data from many Western governments.

Meanwhile, multiple top scientific journals rejected this study without review.

Critics are now asking whether global health authorities are deliberately suppressing findings that challenge their narrative.

With Europe facing a demographic crisis of historic proportions, questions about the long-term impact of mass vaccination campaigns are only growing louder.

If fertility continues to collapse at the current pace, the implications for population sustainability, economic stability, and national security will be profound.

And if these declines are indeed linked to the vaccines, as the data suggests, the fallout could dwarf the initial crisis the shots were supposedly intended to prevent.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/europe-sounds-alarm-birth-rates-plunge-among-covid-vaxxed/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-newsletter

And,

READ MORE – Life Expectancy of Covid-Vaxxed Plunges by 30 Years

Official U.S. federal government data has revealed that Covid “vaccines” have caused a staggering 4.7 times as many deaths as the virus they were supposedly meant to tackle.

Veteran broadcaster Steve Gruber is among a growing chorus of media figures expressing major concerns about the soaring deaths, disease, and injuries caused by Covid “vaccines,” long after public demand has plummeted and serious questions have mounted.

Gruber recently hosted renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough on his show on Real America’s Voice.

Dr. McCullough gave a blunt and chilling assessment when asked if anyone should be taking these shots anymore: “No.”

McCullough, one of the most cited physicians in the world on COVID-19, went further, breaking down what he called the devastating math behind the Covid response: the deaths attributed to the virus itself versus those caused by the so-called vaccine.

The official CDC figure claims 1,229,590 deaths “with COVID-19,” meaning anyone who tested positive via PCR or antigen at any time before death.

But McCullough emphasized that without proper adjudication to review medical records and determine if SARS-CoV-2 actually caused the death, that number is deeply misleading.

According to McCullough’s estimate, only about 10% of those deaths would be found to be caused by the virus, putting the actual number closer to 122,959.

He cited data from the National Center for Health Statistics showing that more than half of these records didn’t even list pneumonia, a hallmark of severe COVID-19, in the final diagnosis.

Then he turned to “vaccine” deaths.

McCullough broke down the official figures to reveal the true cost of the mass “vaccination” campaign.

WATCH: Click on the link below the image below to view and watch video…

Official Data: ‘Vaccines’ Caused Far More Deaths Than Covid

Vaccine Deaths Far Outpace Virus Deaths, McCullough Warns

As of now, 19,417 deaths have been reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID-19 vaccination, many submitted by doctors who believe the vaccine was the direct cause of death.

However, public health experts, including those testifying before the FDA, have long acknowledged that VAERS captures only a fraction of adverse events.

Dr. David Wiseman, in FDA testimony, noted that a conservative underreporting multiplier of 30x should be applied.

When McCullough did the math:

30 x 19,417 = 582,510 estimated deaths following COVID vaccination.

That’s over 4.7 times more deaths than the virus itself, according to McCullough’s adjusted estimates.

Despite the staggering potential toll, the federal government continues to purchase more shots and pressure Americans into “booster” campaigns, even as millions of doses sit unused or are destroyed.

Gruber, echoing the concerns of many Americans, expressed disbelief that taxpayer dollars are still funding what critics now call a deadly and failed experiment.

And McCullough’s verdict is unflinching: “No more shots. Not for anyone.

“The risk-benefit profile has completely collapsed.”

This latest analysis is part of a growing outcry from doctors, researchers, and former federal officials demanding a full investigation into the true death toll linked to Covid “vaccines.”

As Slay News previously reported, explosive official government data from New Zealand has also shown that “Covid deaths” only surged among the “vaccinated.”

According to figures from Our World in Data, a staggering 99% of New Zealand’s so-called “Covid deaths” happened after 75% of the population had received two doses of mRNA “vaccines.”

These figures do not reflect the alleged “safe and effective” narrative.

Australia has followed a near-identical path.

Deaths were flat before the jab rollouts, then exploded once the population was convinced they should “trust the science.”

In just nine months following mass “vaccination,” Australia saw a 6.9x increase in “Covid deaths.”

For New Zealand, it was even worse, showing a 63x increase.

Even Japan’s top RNA scientist, Professor Yasufumi Murakami of Tokyo University, reviewed data on 18 million people and reached a chilling conclusion, as Slay News reported.

“The more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die,” Professor Murakami concluded.

While media outlets and government agencies continue to downplay VAERS data, whistleblowers and clinicians insist it’s irresponsible, even dangerous, to ignore the signals.

For now, Americans are left with a haunting possibility: that the cure was deadlier than the disease, and those who warned us were silenced for telling the truth.

Follow the link for the source of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/official-data-vaccines-caused-far-more-deaths-than-covid/

And,

READ MORE – Bombshell Study: Covid Shots Triggered VAIDS Spike in Children

Scientists have issued a stomach-churning warning after discovering that people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines” face a long-term risk of suffering sudden and catastrophic brain damage.

The alert was issued by a group of Italy’s leading scientists, who are warning the public of the devastating long-term health risks faced by the Covid-vaccinated.

The experimental medicine researchers found that people who received the injections face persistent neurological symptoms.

In their study, the researchers reveal that mRNA “vaccines” initiate abnormal immune responses.

The immune responses can suddenly trigger deadly damage in the brain, creating long-term risks.

The study was led by Drs. Alireza Hajabbas Farshchi, Andrea De Maria, and Simona Sivori.

The renowned Italian medical experts conducted the study at the Università degli Studi di Genova’s Department of Experimental Medicine.

The results of the peer-reviewed study were published in the UNITesi medical journal.

The team sought to explore immune mechanisms underlying persistent post-vaccination symptoms following surging reports of brain damage among the mRNA-vaccinated.

The study investigates Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination (PASC-vac).

The scientists hypothesized that persistent neurological symptoms following Covid mRNA “vaccination” are linked to abnormal immune responses.

These immune responses include autoantibody generation and innate immune dysregulation.

This observational study analyzed 71 patients diagnosed with PASC-vac alongside 19 healthy controls.

Subjects underwent detailed immunological profiling, including flow cytometry of lymphocyte populations, serum antibody characterization, and tissue analysis for nerve fiber density.

Special attention was paid to levels of anti-idiotype antibodies and the role of inflammatory precursor cells (CD34+ DNAM-1^bright CXCR4+), believed to be involved in post-vaccination immune disruption.

The PASC-vac cohort commonly exhibited peripheral neurological symptoms, such as paresthesia, dysautonomia, and vasomotor disturbances.

The scientists found that the “vaccinated” cohort suffered persistent neurological symptoms and also faced the risk of long-term damage.

Immunological analysis revealed elevated anti-idiotype antibody levels and significant disruption in peripheral lymphocyte populations compared to controls.

Evidence also indicated expansion of inflammatory precursor cells linked to chronic immune activation.

Skin biopsies confirmed reduced small nerve fiber density, supporting a link to small fiber neuropathy (SFN).

These observations suggest that PASC-vac may be driven by maladaptive humoral and innate immune responses following Covid mRNA “vaccination.”

The findings imply that “vaccines” have caused widespread harm and created long-term risks for those who received the injections, including those who may not have developed symptoms yet.

The study adds to growing concern over deadly “post-vaccine syndromes.”

As Slay News previously reported, leading scientists from the world-renowned Yale University recently came to similar conclusions following a landmark study.

The Yale University School of Medicine study confirmed that Covid mRNA “vaccines” cause vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (VAIDS).

The study found that mRNA injections alter human biology to create long-term spike protein production that increases over time.

The scientists warn that the Covid mRNA vaccines alter T cell immunophenotypes, which triggers VAIDS – or “vaccine-induced AIDS.”

Like the Italian study, the Yale researchers also determined that the injections cause long-term “post-vaccine syndromes.”

Two of the study’s co-senior authors, Harlan Krumholz and Akiko Iwasaki, have been leaders in investigating mRNA shots’ links to so-called “Long Covid.”

Krumholz and Iwasaki believe the disorder should be renamed “Long Vax.”

The study investigates whether individuals experiencing chronic symptoms after Covid vaccination exhibit distinct immunological and antigenic signatures.

The condition is referred to as “post-vaccination syndrome” (PVS).

The authors hypothesize that persistent antigenemia, immune dysregulation, and viral reactivation (e.g., Epstein-Barr Virus) contribute to PVS pathophysiology.

Journalist Alex Berenson, who has been reporting on the research for some time, commented that the study has exposed the link between Covid mRNA “vaccines” and VAIDS.

Journalist Alex Berenson, who has been reporting on the research for some time, commented that the study has exposed the link between Covid mRNA “vaccines” and VAIDS.

https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1892196539147202839?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1892196539147202839%7Ctwgr%5Ef1845859a6cb25b0bc45e1184a2d349d40350659%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fslaynews.com%2Fnews%2Fscientists-warn-covid-vaxxed-face-long-term-risk-sudden-brain-damage%2F

Meanwhile, a shocking new peer-reviewed study has just confirmed that so-called “long Covid” is actually a side effect of the mRNA “vaccines” and not the virus.

The explosive study has just detonated one of the biggest lies of the pandemic era, revealing that neurological and psychiatric symptoms blamed on “long Covid” are now showing up in people who were never even infected with the virus, but who were heavily “vaccinated.”

The team of researchers behind the study was led by Dr. Yi-Chun Chen of the Department of Neurology at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and College of Medicine at Taiwan’s Chang Gung University.

The results of the peer-reviewed study were published in the world-renowned Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection.

The study confirms what critics of the shots have warned all along: It is not the virus causing long-term health issues but the so-called “vaccines” themselves.

Follow the link for the source of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/scientists-warn-covid-vaxxed-face-long-term-risk-sudden-brain-damage/

And,

READ MORE – 99% of ‘Covid Deaths’ Were ‘Vaccinated,’ Official Data Reveals

Blog Comment: And there has not beena single major enquiry into these experimental mRNA injections by any Western policician or Leader…the big question ios WHY?

Heavily Covid-vaccinated populations have been hit with devastating news after a study found that the average life expectancy of people who received at least two doses of mRNA “vaccines” has plummeted by a staggering 30 years.

The alarming study found that the mRNA injections reduce a person’s lifespan by a whopping 37%.

The bone-chilling figure means that “vaccinated” people will loose roughly 30 years of their life.

In the United States, the average life expectancy in 2019 was 78.79 years.

A 37% reduction from 78.79 equals a loss of just over 29.15 years.

The average life expectancy in the Western world, generally encompassing Europe, North America, and parts of Asia and Australia, is around 80-83 years.

This means that between 29.6 to 30.71 years have been wiped from the average life expectancy in Western nations.

The team of leading Italian researchers who conducted the explosive study was led by Professor Marco Alessandria of the University of Turin.

The bombshell findings of Prof. Alessandria and his team were published in the renowned Swiss medical journal MDPI.

The study has further confirmed warnings from leading experts about the long-term impact of the Covid mRNA injections.

The researchers found that the Covid-vaxxed suffered a “statistically significant” loss of life expectancy after two or more doses.

Following a detailed analysis of the study, the McCullough Foundation confirms that those who received two doses of the shots have lost 37% of their life expectancy.

The Foundation, founded by eminent American cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, reported:

“The subjects vaccinated with two doses lost 37% of life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population during the follow-up considered.”

Further, the study found so-called “booster” shots are completely “ineffective.”

This is not some “conspiracy theory,” however.

This conclusion is now documented in peer-reviewed literature.

Steve Kirsch, the MIT computer scientist and data expert who founded the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF), responded the the explosive study in an interview.

Kirsch breaks down what this tragic news could mean for young people.

WATCH: Click on the Link to view and hear the Video below – 3 Decades Wiped from Life Expectancy of Covid-Vaxxed

The results of the study further confirm previous warnings about the Covid mRNA injections.

As Slay News first reported in 2023, a separate study found that Covid-vaccinated members of the public have lost an estimated 25 years of their life expectancy.

However, for the previous study, researchers analyzed government data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Cleveland Clinic Data, and insurance company risk assessment data.

The analysis uncovered a disturbing trend showing life spans plummetting in those who had multiple doses of the shots.

The latest Cleveland Clinic Data and the latest U.S. data were analyzed by Josh Stirling, founder of Insurance Collaboration to Save Lives and former #1 ranked Insurance Analyst.

Stirling’s study shows an incredibly disturbing trend.

The damage to health caused by each vaccine dose does not lessen over time, as it appears to continue indefinitely.

The data shows that every year, excess deaths are soaring dramatically as all forms of mortality accelerate, despite the level of injections people take going down.

The issue is not isolated to the United States, however, and is impacting nations all around the world.

Recent government data out of Australia shows that the excess deaths in 2022 were 5162% higher than in previous years.

According to the study based on Cleveland’s government data, the average age of a man is around 80 years if he’s unvaxxed.

Yet, the rate of vaxxed deaths is growing in comparison to unvaxxed.

The study found that someone who’s had 4 or 5 shots and is 30 years old today can now expect to live to 55 at the oldest.

However, according to the latest study, based on newer figures, life expectancy may be reducing.

37 percent of an 80-year-old’s life equates to 29.6 years.

This means 30-year-olds who received two or more shots can now expect to live to around 50.

Meanwhile, Stirling’s study aligns with a recent admission from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

As Slay News reported, the FDA revealed that people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines” are at risk of suffering a sudden and unexpected death for up to 15 years after they received their last injection.

According to the FDA, the mRNA “vaccines” have created a sudden death ticking time bomb due to the massively increased risk of “vaccinated” people suffering from a deadly blood clot.

The shocking admission was revealed in a new peer-reviewed study published in the prestigious International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science.

According to the study, the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research admits that the “regulatory window of concern” for a novel genetic product, such as Covid mRNA “vaccines,” is 5-15 years.

Worryingly, the admission suggests that the vaccinated population may be facing a wave of surging blood clots as the Covid shots were only rolled out for public use roughly four years ago.

Follow the link for the source of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/life-expectancy-covid-vaxxed-plunges-30-years/

And,

READ MORE – Japan Issues Global Alert as Excess Deaths of Covid-Vaxxed Explode

Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair is calling on his globalist allies in the UK’s socialist government to begin rolling out digital IDs for the general public.

According to Blair, pushing citizens into adopting a digital ID and “wallet” will help the ruling Labour Party “flush out” populism among the population.

Blair, a World Economic Forum (WEF) “agenda contributor,” claims that digital ID and artificial intelligence (AI) are the golden ticket to what he calls “the holy grail of governing.”

Along with his ally, current Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Blair is pushing for the UK to advance the rollout of digital IDs.

Starmer is now pledging to transform the UK into an “AI superpower.”

Speaking to The Times, Blair laid out his vision for the public to be tied down with AI-driven technology.

“You’ve got to reorder the Government around this technology revolution,” Blair proclaimed.

Of course, Blair insists that he’s only pushing an AI-powered digital “wallet” for “efficiency.”

“You should be able to have a state that is smaller, more strategic, and providing greater efficiency at lower cost,” he explained.

Blair added that technology is “the instrument that allows you to do it.”

He’s calling on Starmer to push the government to make digital identity systems a cornerstone of its modernization efforts.

Stamer’s government has already announced plans to roll out a digital “wallet” in June.

The “wallet” will allow people to store official documents—like driving licenses—on their phones.

However, this is just the beginning, according to Blair.

“There’s a big debate coming down the line,” he warned.

“How much privacy are you prepared to trade for efficiency?”

Blair is confident the public will happily surrender their personal freedom in exchange for smoother interactions with the state.

“My view is that people are actually prepared to trade quite a lot,” he declared.

Blair envisions this new digital ID regime as a multi-purpose tool to control immigration, ensure public services are accessed only by those entitled to them, and prevent unauthorized migrants from gaming the system.

“It’s sending a signal that there’s no point in thinking you’re going to come here and disappear into a kind of grey economy,” he told The Times.

However, after touting the “efficiency” benefits of his plan, Blair then revealed that digital ID can be used as a weapon to “flush out” his party’s opponents.

“It will also flush out a lot of people who want to talk about issues like immigration or benefit fraud but don’t actually have the means to get to the end,” he mused.

The real utility of digital ID, beyond supposed “efficiency,” is to expose and eliminate populism.

Meanwhile, Starmer’s government is pressing forward with its digital initiatives.

The push for digital IDs, biometric tracking, and centralized data systems has always been justified by appeals to security, efficiency, and progress.

And yet, history tells us that governments rarely — if ever — tighten their grip on information without also tightening their grip on power.

Blair’s vision is clear: a frictionless, AI-powered governance model where the state operates like a tech giant, and the citizen is merely a user navigating its services.

Whether the public is as enthusiastic about this brave new world remains to be seen.

Follow the link for the source of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/uk-government-roll-out-digital-id-flush-out-populism/

And,

READ MORE – UN Pushes Digital IDs to Fight ‘Global Warming’by Forcing ‘Behavior Change’ Among Public

Blogger Comment: Western poltical leaders for the past 35 years have cause western civilization to fail and they are still doing it for their vastly wealthy Globalist masters in Davos and where I cannot understand why people think that western social and economic decline and destruction is natural and the only thing that I can think of is, that they are completely ignorant of what is happening and fully brainwashed by our leaders in the West and the Globalist controlled MSM..

In a move that reads more like Orwell than Westminster, the British government has officially labeled nearly half of its own population as extremists.

However, the aggressive label was not for plotting violence, but for holding the audacious belief that Western civilization is worth preserving.

The UK’s Prevent anti-terrorism program now classifies “cultural nationalism,” the idea that mass migration and lack of cultural integration are threatening British identity, as a gateway to terrorism.

Yet, that’s not a fringe conspiracy theory.

That’s in government training materials, which warn that citizens who believe Western culture is “under threat” should be treated as potential radical extremists requiring “intervention.”

Welcome to the UK in 2025, where patriotism is now probable cause.

“This is a matter of serious concern,” wrote Lord Toby Young, general secretary of the Free Speech Union, in a letter to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper.

Young slammed the government for expanding the definition of extremism to include perfectly lawful, mainstream views.

And it’s not just hypothetical.

Young noted that even former Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick, who warned against “excessive, uncontrolled migration,” and Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who said immigration could turn Britain into “an island of strangers,” would now be flagged as radicals.

Britain’s own government leaders would be deemed terrorist-adjacent under their own anti-radicalization rubric.

The UK’s program, which failed to stop mass killer Axel Rudakubana despite multiple referrals, has instead turned its sights on political dissenters, retirees, and anyone who values British heritage.

Among those flagged by the scheme were:

• Julian Foulkes, a retired police officer, was arrested for a social media post and interrogated for having a “very Brexity” book collection. He later received £20,000 in compensation and an apology.
• Allison Pearson, a Daily Telegraph columnist, was questioned by police over a tweet criticizing pro-Hamas protests.
• A 24-year-old autistic man was referred to Prevent for visiting right-leaning comedy sites and reading anti-trans content.
• And in 2024 alone, the UK government arrested 1,177 people for “offensive” online posts under the Communications Act 2003, with penalties reaching up to seven years in prison.

One woman in Cheshire was arrested for an immigration post deemed “inaccurate.”

A man near Liverpool was charged with “racial hatred” over a post on X.

Neither of them threatened violence, however.

“The police showed up at my door like I was a terrorist,” the woman told The Telegraph.

Meanwhile, British authorities let Hamas flag-wavers and leftist street rioters march freely, claiming it’s all protected expression.

But don’t think this insanity stops on British soil, as America has been right behind.

Former President Joe Biden’s administration was also quietly laying the groundwork for its own domestic “thought police” regime:

• A 2022 DHS bulletin flagged Americans with “grievances over immigration or cultural change” as potential violent extremists, without citing any crimes.
• A 2023 FBI whistleblower revealed “threat tags” created to track conservatives, parents at school board meetings, and Covid policy skeptics.
• The White House worked directly with Big Tech to flag posts for removal. In 2021, then-Press Secretary Jen Psaki boasted, “We’re flagging problematic posts for Facebook.”
• A 2024 House Judiciary report confirmed Biden’s team pressured Meta and X to silence conservative voices, medical experts, and dissenters, even when no laws were broken.

“I was shadowbanned for questioning mask mandates,” said Dr. Jane Ruby, a medical commentator with 300,000 X followers.

“No warning. No explanation. Just silenced.”

Even travelers weren’t safe.

The TSA’s “Quiet Skies” program used algorithms to tag Americans for enhanced screening based on “ideological beliefs” and social media posts, again, with no criminal wrongdoing required.

In a 2024 post on X, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) sounded the alarm:

“Biden’s DHS is treating dissent like terrorism.

“It’s a gross overreach.”

The UK has gone full dystopia under the far-left socialist Labour Party.

The nation’s government is branding traditional values and national pride as precursors to terror.

Meanwhile, officials are excusing actual extremists in the streets.

When loving your country becomes evidence of extremism, free society isn’t just under threat, it’s already been breached.

The transnationalist elite would rather criminalize concern than admit failure.

But Americans should take the UK’s fate as a warning: If you don’t stand up for liberty, you’ll be arrested for exercising it.

Follow the link for the source of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/uk-government-flagged-almost-half-own-citizens-terrorist-ideology/

And,

READ MORE – UK Government Urged to Roll Out Digital IDs to ‘Flush Out’ Populism

A new Covid “vaccine” is advancing through clinical trials in the United States, but this time it’s not a shot in the arm, it’s a “breathable” mist that “vaccinates” people by entering the lungs.

In what researchers are calling a “first-of-its-kind” study, a team at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, led by Dr. Paul Spearman, has released early trial results on a Covid “vaccine” spray.

The study was funded by CyanVac LLC and published in Science Advances.

The candidate, called CVXGA1, is delivered via nasal spray, directly into the mucous membranes.

The atomized “vaccine” is being touted as the next frontier in pandemic “prevention.”

However, while legacy media and government researchers call the results “encouraging,” the trial and the technology behind it raise major concerns about safety, transparency, and future public health policy, particularly among Americans who’ve already been burned by broken vaccine promises.

The study involved just 72 people, aged 12–53, and aimed to test how the human body responds to live virus vectors sprayed directly into the respiratory system.

Participants received either low or high doses of the nasal vaccine and were monitored for adverse events and immune responses.

Among those who received higher doses, mild side effects such as runny nose (25%), headache (25%), and nausea (8%) were most common.

According to the study authors, no fevers or grade 3 adverse events were reported, and no hospitalizations occurred.

But even with the optimistic headline, the details paint a more complicated picture.

While researchers highlight a 67% relative reduction in symptomatic infections in high-dose recipients compared to the low-dose group, serum antibody levels were modest, and neutralizing antibodies, the ones that matter most, were rare, showing up in less than 13% of participants.

That means most of the immune “response” touted by researchers came not from traditional antibodies, but from mucosal immunity (IgA/IgG in the nose) and T-cell activation.

These responses are far more difficult to measure and far less understood in terms of long-term protection.

In short, the vaccine may be generating immune “activity,” but it’s unclear what kind, for how long, or whether it translates to meaningful protection.

Meanwhile, the trials are raising serious concerns about efforts to roll out “airborne vaccines.”

The use of live virus vectors to deliver genetic material into the respiratory system poses serious ethical and safety questions, particularly when viral RNA was detected in recipients’ nasal passages just two days after administration.

While researchers insist the vaccine strain remained “genetically stable,” the fact that viral genetic material was detectable at all will alarm those already concerned about shedding, unintended exposure, or mandated transmission-based vaccine delivery.

Moreover, CVXGA1 is based on a parainfluenza virus vector, which raises the possibility of repurposing or expanding similar delivery systems for other vaccines, or potentially even non-consensual public health interventions in the future.

The trial was fully funded by CyanVac LLC, and several of the authors are either employees or equity holders in the company.

One researcher has accepted grants or consulting fees from major pharmaceutical players, including Moderna, GSK, and Sanofi.

This isn’t an independent study.

It’s corporate-funded research conducted by those who stand to benefit from the product’s success.

Even more concerning was that the trial lacked a placebo group, and participants were not randomized.

Many had prior Covid infections or mRNA “vaccinations,” which muddies the waters on what immune responses came from the nasal “vaccine” and which came from previous exposure.

Without a proper control group, how can Americans trust the claims being made?

Intranasal vaccines represent a paradigm shift in how public health officials and pharmaceutical companies could approach vaccination in the future.

These tools don’t just target disease; they target behavior.

If nasal sprays become normalized, it raises the risk of bypassing medical consent, eroding bodily autonomy, and potentially enabling population-wide exposure through aerosols.

And with larger trials already underway, including one aimed at over 10,000 participants by 2027, there’s no sign this is slowing down.

The trial for CVXGA1 may be promoted as a success, but beneath the headlines lies a troubling trend: new, poorly understood “vaccine” technologies with limited transparency and fast-tracked regulatory backing.

For vaccine-injured individuals and those who’ve fought for medical choice, the message is clear: the fight isn’t over, and airborne vaccine delivery may be the next battleground.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/new-breathable-covid-vaccine-advances-through-us-clinical-trials/

And,

READ MORE – Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ‘ZERO’ Evidence Proving ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’

Chilling data is sending shockwaves through armed forces and health circles alike after evidence from the official military database revealed that deaths and injuries are surging among American service members who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

American attorney Todd Callender is sounding the alarm over the discovery, warning that the death rate among U.S. military service members jumped an astonishing 1,100% in the first 10 months of 2021.

Callender has been working with Scott Davison, CEO of the insurer OneAmerica, to investigate internal insurance industry data.

They have uncovered evidence of surging deaths and injuries among the general public since the mass vaccination campaign was rolled out in early 2021.

Excess mortality in the U.S. military started skyrocketing shortly after the Biden administration was forcing experimental mRNA Covid shots on young troops.

Callender points directly to data from the Pentagon’s own Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) as proof that something catastrophic happened after the vaccine mandates were rolled out.

And the numbers, he says, don’t lie.

During an interview on TruNews, he reveals that the data shows that excess deaths spiked dramatically in 2021, when compared to 2020, and continued surging from there.

“We know from the DMED database, the military’s database… that in 10 months of 2021, so not even the complete year, all causes of morbidity and excess mortality had increased, according to the military’s own numbers, by 1100% over 2020,” Callender explained in a recent video.

According to the attorney, the deaths and medical conditions occurred primarily in young, healthy military members between the ages of 18 and 40.

He added that despite criminal complaints being filed on behalf of roughly 20,000 servicemen, no real investigation has been launched by the Department of Defense or any federal agency.

“That’s called a conspiracy; it’s a very grand conspiracy,” Callender declared.

The timeline raises serious questions: Reports of myocarditis, a deadly form of heart inflammation, began surfacing in early 2021.

The reports exploded just weeks after Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA shots were authorized for use.

Israel had already warned of myocarditis risks in February of that year.

The Pentagon said it was reviewing at least 14 cases.

However, to this day, no formal admission or accountability has come from military leadership.

One Navy surgeon, Dr. Lee Merritt, went public in August 2021 to sound the alarm about what she was seeing in real-time, as Slay News reported.

“Dr. Merritt recently addressed the American Frontline Doctors and discussed how all through 2020 there were only 20 deaths among all active duty military personnel related to Covid,” reported Vaccine Impact.

“However, there are now many reports of tumors and over 80 cases of myocarditis… following the COVID-19 shots given to the military.”

Merritt didn’t hold back:

“With the vaccine program, we’ve ostensibly killed more of our young active duty people than Covid did.”

And Callender, backed by years of legal and scientific scrutiny, didn’t mince words either.

“This is genocide; we said it from the beginning,” Callender said.

“One of the easy ways to look at this is really simple.

“If you look at all the documentations, Pfizer documentation, we did mass spectrometry on their vials, we know what’s in these things…”

He alleges the use of lipid nanoparticles was no accident.

Lipid nanoparticles are microscopic delivery systems.

Callender warns that they were designed to “bypass” the immune system and deliver gene-altering proteins.

“They couldn’t slip this lipid nanoparticles… little bombers that carry pathogenic proteins to effectuate gene modification in the individual,” he says.

“In order to get those lipid nanoparticles past cellular defense, your body’s natural defense, they have to disarm your immune system. And they did that.”

Callender then delivered perhaps the most explosive statement yet:

“Our expert… call[s] it autoimmune deficiency syndrome; it’s basically ‘vaccine AIDS.’

“And right now they’re coming to understand this, people showing up HIV positive, people with three shots have no immune system left whatsoever.

“There is no other way to characterize this other than intentional homicide… which makes it genocide!”

WATCH: Click on the link below the image to view…

Deaths Skyrocket Among Covid-Vaxxed Military Members

Despite the gravity of these allegations, corporate media outlets remain silent.

No major network has covered the DMED revelations, and neither the CDC nor the Department of Defense has publicly addressed the catastrophic surge in military medical data.

The silence is deafening.

As more insiders come forward, the question grows louder: How many lives were sacrificed in the name of “public health”?

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/deaths-skyrocket-among-covid-vaxxed-military-members/

And,

READ MORE – Major Study: ‘Long Covid’ Caused by ‘Vaccines,’ Not Virus