World Freedom

A devastating new peer-reviewed analysis has revealed that every single dose of the experimental Covid mRNA “vaccines” reduces life expectancy, directly linking repeated injections to shortened lives.

The alarming finding systematically dismantles claims that the “vaccines” saved millions of lives and instead confirms the opposite: mortality actually increased with each additional dose.

The study was led by researchers Dr. John Oller, a leading Florida pharmacist, and Dr. Eduardo Santiago, Professor Emeritus at the University of New Mexico.

The paper, “The Oller and Santiago Rebuttal,” reviews global data on excess deaths and vaccine rollout, finding a disturbing correlation between the number of shots administered and a measurable drop in population survival rates.

“Each dose of the COVID-19 shots shortened the lives of recipients,” the authors concluded, noting that excess mortality rose in lockstep with vaccine uptake across multiple countries.

The study was published in the prestigious International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (IJVTPR).

Evidence Hidden in Plain Sight

Oller and Santiago show that governments and health agencies promoted flawed “counterfactual models” to argue that “vaccines” prevented millions of deaths.

However, when actual mortality data is examined, the story flips and reveals that nations with higher “vaccination” rates experienced greater excess deaths after 2021, often timed with booster campaigns.

The researchers argue that the very claim that the shots saved lives was not supported by empirical evidence but by statistical tricks.

In contrast, real-world data on all-cause mortality consistently show the opposite.

A Global Crisis of Trust

The implications of these findings are explosive.

If each additional shot contributes to early death, as the authors argue, then public health officials knowingly pushed a campaign that harmed rather than protected populations.

This conclusion echoes the historic ruling from the Alliance of Indigenous Nations (AIN) International Tribunal.

As Slay News reported last week, the global body declared that mRNA injections meet the definition of biological and technological weapons of mass destruction under multiple international treaties.

The Tribunal, recognized under international law, found that the shots violated the Biological Weapons Convention and set a precedent by issuing a binding order against their use.

When placed side by side, the Tribunal’s declaration and the new mortality data present a damning picture: not only are the injections harmful, but international authorities have already classified them as bioweapons.

Together, they suggest that the campaign to inject billions of people worldwide may represent one of the gravest public health and human rights violations in history.

Demanding Accountability

Critics are now asking why regulators ignored these red flags, why health authorities relied on speculative models instead of real data, and why dissenting scientists were silenced.

The paper insists that the evidence is strong enough to demand a complete halt to the shots:

“It is now clear that the COVID-19 mRNA injections did not extend life — they shortened it, dose by dose.”

This conclusion directly challenges the foundation of global vaccine policy.

The findings represent one of the most catastrophic public health failures in history.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/major-study-confirms-covid-vaccine-dose-shortens-lives-recipients/

And,

READ MORE – Top Scientist: ‘Billions of People’ Have Been Permanently ‘Altered’ by Covid ‘Vaccines’

A new study has claimed that people suffering from asthma are causing “global warming” due to the “carbon emissions” from their inhalers.

Millions of Americans rely on inhalers for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

However, climate activists and their allies in academia are targeting those lifesaving devices as a threat to the planet.

A new JAMA study claims inhalers generate over 2 million metric tons of “carbon emissions” annually.

The “emissions,” the authors say, are equal to the output of 530,000 cars on the road.

The study singles out metered-dose inhalers (MDIs), which use hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellants, as the supposed villains.

MDIs are allegedly responsible for 98% of emissions.

Instead of focusing on affordability, access, or patient outcomes, researchers are urging a shift to “low-emission” alternatives.

Pharmaceutical giants like AstraZeneca are already pledging to replace traditional MDIs with new propellants, aligning with global climate goals rather than patient demand.

Study author Dr. William Feldman of UCLA framed the issue as an opportunity to fight “climate change,” saying:

“Inhalers add to the growing carbon footprint of the US healthcare system, putting many patients with chronic respiratory disease at risk.

“On the upside, there is tremendous opportunity to make changes that protect both patients and the planet by utilizing lower-emission alternatives.”

But critics warn the push reveals how globalist climate agendas are being prioritized over human health.

For patients living with asthma or COPD, inhalers are not optional; they are lifesaving.

Any move that makes them more expensive or harder to access risks prioritizing ideology over patient survival.

The study itself relied on prescription databases and emission models, rather than clinical outcomes.

Researchers now plan to compare “low-emission” and “high-emission” inhalers in different patient populations, while also studying how patents and pricing strategies could accelerate the adoption of “green” inhaler technologies.

“A key first step to driving change is understanding the true scale of the problem,” Feldman said.

“From there, we can identify what’s fueling these emissions and develop targeted strategies to reduce them.”

However, the danger is clear.

Once again, climate politics are being used as a wedge to reshape healthcare.

Instead of prioritizing effective, affordable treatment, regulators and corporations appear eager to impose environmental compliance.

The move could raise costs, limit availability, and shift control from patients and doctors to climate bureaucrats.

This isn’t the first time climate policy has collided with medical care.

Similar arguments have been made about diet, farming, and energy usage in hospitals, with critics warning that the goal isn’t health, but greater centralization and globalist control under the banner of “sustainability.”

For patients struggling to breathe, the last thing they need is government-approved rationing of their inhalers in the name of carbon neutrality.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/study-claims-asthma-inhalers-causing-global-warming/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-newsletter

And,

READ MORE – Scientists Blame ‘Climate Anxiety’ for Plunging Birth Rates Among Covid-Vaxxed

The European Union (EU) is pushing a sweeping new policy that would allow children of any age to legally “change their gender” and punish member nations that refuse to comply.

The unelected European Commission’s “LGBTIQ+ Equality Strategy 2026–2030” was unveiled on Wednesday.

It calls for eliminating age limits and medical safeguards, declaring it will “support the development of legal gender recognition procedures based on self-determination that are free from age restrictions.”

The plan would also ban so-called “talking therapy,” counseling intended to help children struggling with gender issues.

In addition, the globalist Commission is threatening to cut funding from regions that resist the EU’s ideological agenda.

Critics say the proposals represent a radical escalation of gender ideology in European law.

Concerns are growing that eurocrats will use the laws to override parental rights and silence women’s concerns.

‘A Chilling, Sinister Strategy’

Maya Forstater, chief executive of the U.K.-based group Sex Matters, blasted the proposals as dangerous.

“This chilling EU-wide strategy pushes legal gender self-identification for children of any age and a ban on talking therapy for vulnerable children,” Forstater told The Telegraph.

– Advertisement –

“It is a mercy that British campaigners for sex-based rights don’t have to deal with this sinister strategy and the pernicious capture of EU institutions, on top of our own challenges in the U.K.”

The Athena Forum, a European women’s rights coalition, also condemned the proposals, warning that women are being “silenced” by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels.

Punishing Dissent

The Commission made clear that member states that refuse to adopt self-ID laws could face penalties.

“Discriminating regions” that refuse to obey the radical gender policies, by instead relying on biological facts, could lose access to EU funding under the new laws.

The move is effectively strong-arming sovereign governments into submission.

In addition, the globalist Commission is threatening to cut funding from regions that resist the EU’s ideological agenda.

Critics say the proposals represent a radical escalation of gender ideology in European law.

Concerns are growing that eurocrats will use the laws to override parental rights and silence women’s concerns.

‘A Chilling, Sinister Strategy’

Maya Forstater, chief executive of the U.K.-based group Sex Matters, blasted the proposals as dangerous.

“This chilling EU-wide strategy pushes legal gender self-identification for children of any age and a ban on talking therapy for vulnerable children,” Forstater told The Telegraph.

“It is a mercy that British campaigners for sex-based rights don’t have to deal with this sinister strategy and the pernicious capture of EU institutions, on top of our own challenges in the U.K.”

The Athena Forum, a European women’s rights coalition, also condemned the proposals, warning that women are being “silenced” by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels.

Punishing Dissent

The Commission made clear that member states that refuse to adopt self-ID laws could face penalties.

“Discriminating regions” that refuse to obey the radical gender policies, by instead relying on biological facts, could lose access to EU funding under the new laws.

The move is effectively strong-arming sovereign governments into submission.

Although the new laws would only apply to EU member states, experts are warning that the policies could impact neighboring nations that are not under the bloc’s rule.

In the U.K., children as young as 16 can already access gender-transition hormones, though they cannot officially change their medical records until 18.

Critics warn the EU plan would take this even further, stripping away parental oversight and medical safeguards altogether.

Sex-based rights groups argue the strategy will harm women and girls, erase protections for female-only spaces, and put vulnerable children at risk of irreversible medical harm.

“This is not equality,” Forstater said.

“It’s ideology imposed at the expense of women, children, and basic biological reality.”

Follow the link fir the source… https://slaynews.com/news/children-all-ages-including-babies-choose-own-gender-new-eu-laws/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-newsletter

And,

READ MORE – Swiss Man Jailed Over Social Media Post Declaring Only Two Genders

Scientists have issued a warning after a study predicted that global cancer deaths with surge by a staggering 75 percent over the next 25 years.

Major new research was published in The Lancet.

The study, conducted by a large team of international researchers, warns that global cancer deaths could climb to alarming levels by 2050.

They found that cancer cases worldwide have already doubled in the past three decades, from about 9 million in 1990 to 18.5 million in 2023.

During the same period, cancer deaths rose 74%, reaching 10.4 million last year.

By 2050, researchers project annual cancer cases will soar to 30.5 million, a 61% increase.

Annual deaths are expected to skyrocket to 18.6 million.

Demographics, Lifestyle, and Environmental Risks

While much of the increase is tied to an aging global population, the report makes clear that lifestyle and environmental risk factors are driving a massive share of the burden.

Researchers found that 42% of cancer deaths in 2023 could be attributed to 44 “modifiable” risk factors, including smoking, poor diet, high blood sugar, and exposure to toxins.

Tobacco use alone accounted for about 21% of global cancer deaths, according to the findings.

The study examined 47 cancer types across 204 countries between 1990 and 2023, projecting trends through mid-century.

Results show steep differences by region: Lebanon saw the highest rise in incidence and mortality rates (80%), followed by Equatorial Guinea (72%) and Laos (55.8%).

By contrast, the United Arab Emirates reported a 56% drop in incidence, and Kazakhstan recorded the largest mortality decline at 58.2%.

The U.S. and Australia both achieved major gains, reducing cancer deaths by more than 30%.

The U.K. saw a 23.4% decline.

Breast and Lung Cancers Lead

Breast cancer was the most commonly diagnosed cancer globally in 2023.

Tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancers remained the leading cause of cancer deaths.

Researchers warned that the burden will disproportionately hit low- and middle-income countries, which by 2050 are expected to account for more than half of all new cases and nearly two-thirds of cancer deaths.

Warnings From Experts

Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research U.K., said the findings highlight the urgency of stronger preventive measures:

“Smoking remains the leading cause of cancer and death in the U.K.”

She urged lawmakers to pass the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, expand HPV vaccination, and strengthen screening programs.

Dr. Lisa Force, assistant professor at the University of Washington and co-author of the study, cautioned that cancer control remains “underprioritized” in global health.

She pointed to inadequate funding and limited access to diagnosis and treatment in many countries as major obstacles.

Elephant in the Room

Despite mounting scientific and clinical concerns, the Lancet report did not address the role of Covid mRNA “vaccines” in cancer trends.

The omission is striking, given a growing body of research pointing to possible links between mRNA shots and cancer-related conditions.

As Slay News has previously reported, peer-reviewed studies and medical case reports have raised red flags about aggressive “turbo cancers” appearing shortly after “vaccination,” persistent spike-protein-related inflammation, and immune dysregulation that may accelerate tumor growth.

Recent articles have also documented findings from oncologists who warn that cancers once thought to be slow-moving are presenting with unusual speed and severity in “vaccinated” patients.

While The Lancet study emphasizes demographics, tobacco, and diet, the lack of acknowledgment of vaccine-related research highlights an uncomfortable reality: public health authorities continue to downplay or ignore emerging evidence that conflicts with their pandemic-era policies.

The new projections serve as a wake-up call.

But the cancer crisis cannot be addressed honestly or effectively if one of the most politically sensitive medical interventions in modern history, the Covid injection rollout, remains off-limits for open investigation.

Follow the link fir the source… https://slaynews.com/news/lancet-study-warns-global-cancer-deaths-surge-2050/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-newsletter

And,

READ MORE – All Covid ‘Vaccines’ Cause Cancer, Major Study Confirms

A group of scientists is raising the alarm after a major new study confirmed that dangerous “abnormalities” are emerging in healthy young adults who received a Covid mRNA “booster” injection.

Evidence confirming that the “vaccines” cause almost immediate damage in people, the six-month longitudinal study found.

Alarmingly, the “abnormalities” are emerging in healthy young adults with no underlying conditions.

Tracking 68 healthy young adults, the study observed significant health risks that emerged just 48 hours after vaccination.

They warn that the findings signal potential long-term issues that public health authorities must not ignore.

The team of researchers was led by Dr. Waleed M. Bawazir of the King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

The results of the study were published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.

The findings have raised serious concerns regarding the potential biological consequences of receiving a third dose of Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccine.”

The study indicates that young, otherwise healthy individuals experienced troubling biological markers after their third mRNA shot.

Within just two days after the “booster” injection, participants exhibited acute systemic inflammation, coagulation abnormalities, and a significant suppression of key immune markers.

One of the most concerning results was the dramatic spike in inflammation markers.

The C-reactive protein (CRP), a well-known marker for systemic inflammation, increased sharply from 6.12 mg/L to 14.84 mg/L, which is considered a significant rise, with the study showing this change was statistically significant (p < 0.0001).

Similarly, another inflammation marker, high-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP), doubled from 1.47 mg/L to 3.52 mg/L (p < 0.0001).

This surge suggests that even a “booster” dose of the “vaccine” could trigger a heightened inflammatory state in the body.

The researchers warn that the finding is deeply concerning, as chronic inflammation can lead to serious health issues in the long term.

In addition to the inflammation, markers for coagulation abnormalities were also found to have increased.

D-dimers, which are associated with clot formation, rose from 0.20 mg/L to 0.47 mg/L (p < 0.005).

Such increases are indicative of pro-thrombotic activity, meaning the body is more likely to form clots, a concern that could potentially lead to life-threatening conditions such as thrombosis or stroke.

These findings further highlight the severe risks posed by the mRNA “vaccines,” which some critics have long warned about regarding clotting and blood vessel damage.

Even more concerning, the study showed evidence of immune suppression following the third dose. Lymphocyte counts, essential components of the immune system, dropped significantly from 2.34 × 10⁹/L to 1.91 × 10⁹/L (p < 0.0005).

Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), a critical protein involved in antiviral defense, also decreased from 54.7 ng/mL to 46.1 ng/mL (p < 0.05).

These findings suggest that the immune response following a third dose may be blunted, increasing the vulnerability of vaccinated individuals to infections or other diseases due to weakened immune defenses.

The study also pointed out a disruption in the participants’ coagulation profile, which was concerning despite the lack of overt symptoms.

Prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were significantly prolonged, patterns that are often seen in vaccine-induced thrombotic cases such as myocarditis, pericarditis, and other clotting syndromes.

Even in the absence of visible symptoms, this could signal underlying clotting disorders that might not be immediately apparent but could have severe long-term health implications.

This study is the first to document the simultaneous occurrence of immune suppression and clotting activation within just 48 hours of receiving a third mRNA “booster” dose, even in young, healthy adults.

These findings challenge the common narrative that “vaccine” reactions are “mild” and primarily concern localized pain or fever.

In reality, the study suggests that mRNA “boosters” can trigger hidden but dangerous disruptions in inflammation, coagulation, and immune function.

Experts warn that these issues act as a ticking time bomb that may not immediately present obvious symptoms but could lead to significant health consequences over time.

These revelations reinforce the concerns of “vaccine” critics, who argue that the full spectrum of risks from these injections, especially the so-called “boosters,” has not been adequately addressed.

Given these findings, it is crucial to take a closer look at the long-term effects of the Covid mRNA shots and whether their risks outweigh their purported benefits.

For those worried about their health, this study adds to the growing body of evidence that demands more caution and transparency before further mRNA “vaccines” are rolled out for widespread use among the general public.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/scientists-warn-deadly-abnormalities-now-emerging-mrna-boosted/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-newsletter

And,

READ MORE – 5,000 Americans Killed by Covid ‘Vaccines’ Every Week, Insurance Data Shows

One of the world’s leading scientists has issued a chilling warning over the unprecedented damage that Covid mRNA “vaccines” have caused to the “billions of people” who received the injections.

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, world-renowned microbiologist, is sounding the alarm after uncovering evidence that the mRNA shots have permanently “altered” those who received them.

Alarmingly, Bhakdi reveals that the injections have damaged brain cells in a way that destroys willpower and intelligence.

Bhakdi warns that the problem is so severe that there are “billions of people” whose brains have been “destroyed” by the Covid shots.

The award-winning former professor of microbiology argues that people have been permanently “altered” by the experimental injections.

“The mRNA vaccines cause the destruction of brain cells,” Dr. Bhakdi warns.

“Obviously. And that is what we are now experiencing.

“We’re seeing – I’m afraid to say – billions of people whose brains are not working anymore.

“Not as they should be.

“They are altered,” he continues.

“And they don’t have the willpower anymore.

“They don’t have the intelligence anymore…”

WATCH: click on the link to view the video below… Renowned Microbiologist: mRNA ‘Vaccines’ ‘Destroyed the Brains’ of ‘Billions of People’

This is not the first time Bhakdi has raised the alarm about the genetic shots, however.

Bhakdi recently warned that the injections are shortening he lifespan of those who received them.

As Slay News reported, Bhakdi warns that mRNA shots are the leading cause of the global surge in cases of myocarditis, a deadly form of heart inflammation.

Bhakdi asserts that the vaccines are responsible for clinically diagnosed myocarditis in “at least one to two percent” of recipients.

While the number may sound small, the figure translates to millions of cases across populations.

In a chilling message, Bhakdi sounds the alarm to warn the public that mRNA injections “shorten the life of human beings.”

He emphasized that no case of vaccine-induced myocarditis should ever be considered minor, stressing:

“You must not shorten the life of a human being.”

Far from being a rare or trivial side effect, Dr. Bhakdi warns that each instance of myocarditis following vaccination is life-threatening and should be treated with the utmost seriousness.

The veteran scientist also issued a blistering rebuke of medical professionals who continue to downplay or deny the risks.

“Immediately… excluded, not allowed to be a doctor anymore,” he said of those who dismiss the role of the “vaccines” in myocarditis.

WATCH: click on the link to view the video below… Renowned Microbiologist Warns Covid Shots ‘Shorten the Life of Human Beings‘

As Slay News reported last year, Bhakdi also testified that Covid mRNA shots are “life-threatening” to humans.

He warned that pushing the injections onto the public only benefits “infinitely evil” global “elites.”

Dr. Bhakdi issued the warning during testimony before lawmakers in the German Parliament.

“The vaccination turned out to be the greatest blessing for the money and world’s elites, for the pharmaceutical industry and politics,” Bhakdi declared.

“They could pursue their own interests, under the common slogan ‘Everything for public health,’ ‘everything for the well-being of the general public.’

“To achieve this goal, they created the WHO [World Health Organization].

“These non-democratically elected people, basically a private association that is in the process of gaining power over the healthcare system in the 190 Member States.”

“Who hasn’t heard about the mysterious sudden cardiac deaths occurring around the world?” he continued.

“They are just the tip of the iceberg,” he warned.

“Heart disease caused by vaccinations is on the agenda of young and old alike.

Concluding his testimony before German lawmakers, Bhakdi declared:

“Anyone who praises RNA vaccines as safe and effective, anyone who claims that vaccination rarely causes serious side effects, is either incredibly ignorant or infinitely evil – they are committing a crime.

“Just like everyone who actively or passively pursues and supports this vaccination.

“Because it is now scientifically proven that vaccination can only have negative effects, and this to a life-threatening extent.”

Follow the link for the source…

https://slaynews.com/news/top-scientist-billions-people-permanently-altered-covid-vaccines/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-newsletter

And,

READ MORE – Germany Issues Red Alert: mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Triggered Global Population Implosion

Physicians are raising urgent concerns about an alarming rise in severe heart problems among children who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

Experts warn that these conditions were once considered almost unheard of in pediatric medicine before the experimental injections were rolled out for public use in early 2021.

Cases of myocarditis, pericarditis, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac dysfunction are being seen at levels doctors say they have never witnessed in their careers.

Pediatric cardiologist Dr. Kirk Milhoan has documented what he describes as a dramatic escalation of heart inflammation and rhythm disturbances in young patients, warning that these illnesses are appearing in children with no previous risk factors.

“These cases were almost unheard of before 2021,” Milhoan explained, noting that they often arise without the viral triggers typically associated with myocarditis.

Emergency departments and pediatric wards are echoing his concerns, reporting children as young as 12 arriving with dangerously elevated troponin levels, a biomarker for heart injury.

The sudden nature of these cases, often in otherwise healthy kids, has left many clinicians unsettled.

Unvaccinated Children Reportedly Less Affected

Adding fuel to the controversy, Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a nephrologist and long-time critic of mass vaccination policies, has revealed that she is seeing stark differences between “vaccinated” and unvaccinated children.

According to Humphries, unvaccinated children in her circles are showing normal cardiac and developmental outcomes, while their “vaccinated” peers are experiencing higher rates of inflammatory and autoimmune conditions.

Humphries’ findings are resonating with parents and independent practitioners who argue that regulators have ignored critical safety signals.

WATCH: Click on the link to view the video below… Heart Disease Surging Among Covid-Vaccinated Children

Health Agencies Offer Few Answers

Despite the mounting reports, major health authorities continue to downplay the trend, attributing rising pediatric heart issues to “multifactorial causes” such as viral infections and disruptions in care during lockdowns.

But critics argue that this is a convenient deflection that avoids examining possible links to recent medical interventions.

The absence of large-scale, independent studies on long-term cardiac outcomes in children has only deepened mistrust.

Milhoan and Humphries, along with other concerned doctors, are calling for transparent investigations free from pharmaceutical influence, something many parents say is long overdue.

Trust in Public Health at Breaking Point

For families already wary of government narratives, the silence from official bodies is seen as part of a broader pattern of institutional denial and lack of accountability.

Each new report of heart injuries in young people further erodes confidence in the medical establishment.

As the gap widens between real-world clinical observations and the assurances of public health agencies, the public demands to know how many more children must be affected before officials stop dismissing these warnings and start a serious investigation.

The stakes reach beyond pediatric care.

This unfolding crisis is fast becoming a test of whether health authorities can prioritize truth and accountability over protecting their own reputations.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/heart-disease-surging-among-covid-vaccinated-children/

And,

READ MORE – Top Immunologist Sounds Alarm as Colon Cancer Skyrockets Among Covid-Vaxxed Children

A federal appeals court has just handed down a chilling decision, ruling that American citizens have no federal right to challenge draconian Covid “vaccine” mandates.

In its Curtis v. Inslee ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by former PeaceHealth employees who were fired in 2021 for refusing Washington State’s COVID jab requirement for healthcare workers.

The court concluded that the workers had no statutory or constitutional right under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to challenge the mandates, meaning there is no federal pathway for citizens to seek damages over being forced to take the shots or lose their jobs.

No Right to Refuse “Investigational” Covid Injections

The plaintiffs argued that they were coerced into taking what they described as “investigational” emergency-use “vaccines” and were never fully informed of their right to refuse.

They cited a long list of statutes and regulations, including the FDA’s EUA statute, the PREP Act, the ICCPR, and CDC program agreements.

However, the court rejected them all, ruling that none of these sources creates privately enforceable rights under § 1983.

On constitutional grounds, the Ninth Circuit doubled down.

The court ruled that there is no fundamental right to refuse “vaccination” without consequences, citing Jacobson v. Massachusetts and its own recent decision in Health Freedom Defense Fund v. Carvalho.

At-will employment, the court said, is not a protected property right under procedural due process.

Equal protection claims also failed because the mandate had medical and religious exemptions and was deemed to serve a “rational” public-health goal, according to the court.

Workers Left Without Federal Recourse

The ruling means that Washington’s 2021 vaccine mandate, imposed by then-Gov. Jay Inslee and mirrored by PeaceHealth’s employment policy, stands unchallenged in federal court.

State-law claims against Inslee were dismissed outright, while remaining claims against PeaceHealth were punted back to state courts.

The court made clear that so-called EUA and “investigational drug” arguments will not open a federal door to challenge mandates.

It marks a devastating blow to medical freedom advocates.

The Ninth Circuit’s decision reinforces that Covid-era “vaccine” mandates remain legally durable, especially in healthcare settings.

It confirms that federal courts will treat mandates as rational public-health measures, even when exemptions are limited and even when employees lose their livelihoods for refusal.

In short, the ruling effectively leaves workers at the mercy of state policies and employers, with no federal protection for those who resist coerced “vaccination.”

This comes even as mounting evidence links Covid injections to autoimmune disorders, turbo cancers, and DNA contamination, and continues to raise questions about the safety of the shots.

Yet courts remain unmoved, leaning on century-old precedent to uphold mandates at the expense of personal freedom.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/appeals-court-rules-american-citizens-no-federal-right-refuse-vaccine-mandates/

And,

READ MORE – Whistleblower: Biden Admin Told Healthcare Employers Not to Report Covid ‘Vaccine’ Injuries

A bombshell new analysis has concluded that the “safe and effective” narratives used to push mass Covid mRNA “vaccination” onto the general public were based on false information.

The study from leading Canadian researchers has shredded one of the central claims used to justify mass vaccination: that the injections “saved millions of lives.”

The report was published this week by the nonprofit Correlation.

It directly challenges high-profile assertions made by prominent pro-vaccine figures like Dr. Peter Hotez and amplified by corporate media outlets.

Hotez repeatedly cited a 2022 study by Dr. Meagan Fitzpatrick claiming Covid “vaccines” prevented 3.2 million deaths in the U.S. alone.

The numbers were widely parroted by the corporate press and even cited in congressional testimony.

However, according to all-cause mortality experts Denis Rancourt, Ph.D., and Joseph Hickey, Ph.D., those claims are based on “counterfactual theoretical calculations.”

The numbers were essentially plucked out of thin air by computer models built on flawed assumptions that generate what the authors call “fantastic and unverifiable” conclusions.

Rancourt and Hickey declared that these “safe and effective” narratives were, therefore, based on “garbage science.”

‘Politics by science’

Rancourt and Hickey argue the problem is simple: the models don’t rely on real-world evidence.

Instead, they simulate alternate realities based on questionable inputs, such as inflated infection fatality rates and vaccine efficacy figures from Big Pharma’s own clinical trials.

“False claims accepted by government officials and their advisers can have a disastrous effect on public health policy and society,” they wrote.

Rancourt blasted the approach:

“This whole industry of counterfactual calculations is what I would call ‘politics by science.’

“It is equivalent to saying, ‘I’m going to argue that the intervention that we made had a huge benefit without having any empirical evidence to support that claim.’”

According to Rancourt, the entire framework is designed to produce a predetermined conclusion that mass vaccination campaigns were an overwhelming success.

However, excess mortality data shows no such benefit.

In fact, data shows the opposite and reveals that excess deaths surged among the “vaccinated.”

Contrived Assumptions, No Real-World Proof

The Lancet and other medical establishment journals published multiple modeling studies claiming “vaccines” prevented between 3 million and 14 million deaths globally.

Yet, when researchers compared those estimates with real mortality data, the picture collapsed.

Rancourt and Hickey found that the models conveniently showed peaks in “lives saved” exactly when “vaccine” rollouts occurred.

They explain that this is an outcome that would require the virus to have suddenly become far more deadly at those moments.

“To believe the models, you’d have to believe these incredible coincidences where the pathogen suddenly became more virulent,” Rancourt explained

Yet there is no evidence of such changes.

Instead, excess mortality data shows that deaths surged after the vaccines were rolled out in early 2021, and then held steady in subsequent years.

‘Garbage Science’

Despite the lack of proof, journals and public health officials continue to promote the claims that the injections “saved millions of lives.”

Rancourt said the situation exposes a corrupt peer-review system bent on protecting Big Pharma:

“The medical establishment paid by pharma are just worker bees trying to find ways to please their masters by inventing these back propagation methods called counterfactual calculations or simulations.

“It’s garbage science,” he warns.

Vaccines Not Mentioned as a Cancer Risk

The report also highlights a broader trend, revealing that major journals and health authorities continue to sidestep growing evidence of Covid “vaccine” harms, including alarming cancer signals.

As Slay News has reported, recent peer-reviewed research has linked mRNA shots to spikes in aggressive cancers, immune suppression, and inflammatory disease.

Studies from Belgium and Japan have documented troubling rheumatologic and oncological patterns post-vaccination.

However, establishment outlets have refused to connect the dots and continue to smear those raising concerns as “conspiracy theorists.”

By refusing to acknowledge such risks while amplifying speculative modeling studies that paint vaccines as life-saving miracles, health authorities have effectively engaged in narrative management rather than honest science.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/major-study-concludes-covid-vax-safe-effective-narrative-based-garbage-science/

And,

READ MORE – International Tribunal Declares Covid Shots ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction’ Under Global Law

Blogger Comment: The Covid-19 mRNA experimental injections have been officialy recognisded as biological and technological weapons of mass destruction and the WEST’s Main steeamn Media (MSM) is “Silent globally”…so does anyone think that this is highly strange and a worldwide cover-up of epic proportions as this is pure genocide in action…but as the Davos Globalists control nearly all (97%) of western MSM through their powerful control of BlackRoch, Vanguard et al, it is no wonder the people only learn of a one-sided story continually…and not the ‘real’ truth…

.

A globally recognized international tribunal has issued a stunning and historic declaration, officially designating Covid mRNA injections as “biological and technological weapons of mass destruction.”

The Alliance of Indigenous Nations (AIN) International Tribunal announced that the ruling applies globally under international law.

AIN made the unprecedented declaration after reviewing hundreds of pages of scientific evidence, legal filings, and sworn affidavits from leading doctors and experts.

The declaration marks the first time any recognized international judicial authority has formally categorized the injections as biological weapons.

The move could have sweeping legal consequences for governments, pharmaceutical companies, and global health agencies.

Tribunal Ruling: “Worldwide Effect”

AIN’s bombshell ruling was first reported by Dr. Joseph Sansone and Lisa Miron.

In its official declaration, the Tribunal stated:

“This Tribunal finds and hereby declares that the ‘COVID-19 nanoparticle injections’ or ‘mRNA nanoparticle injections’ or ‘COVID-19 injections’ meet the criteria of biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction according to the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, of 1989 18 USC § 175; Weapons and Firearms § 790.166 Fla. Stat. (2023), Canada‘s Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention Implementation Act, 2004, and the International Biological Weapons Convention.

“This Order and Declaration is intended to have immediate worldwide effect.”

The AIN ruling was based on multiple legal and scientific frameworks, including U.S. and Canadian law and the International Biological Weapons Convention.

Canada Formally Recognized Tribunal’s Sovereignty

Adding weight to the judgment, Canada’s Ministry of Crown–Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs formally recognized the Alliance of Indigenous Nations, its Treaty, and its International Tribunal in December 2024.

In a letter dated Dec. 13, 2024, Canada affirmed its “nation-to-nation relationship” with AIN, thereby acknowledging the Tribunal

as a sovereign legal authority under international law.

This recognition gives the declaration international legitimacy and places immediate pressure on governments and public health authorities worldwide.

Expert Evidence Submitted

The Tribunal reviewed expert testimony and affidavits filed in ongoing legal cases, including submissions from:

   • Dr. Francis Boyle, JD, PhD, author of the U.S. Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, who declared as early as 2020 that Covid “vaccines” were bioweapons.

   • Dr. Ana Mihalcea, MD, PhD

   • Dr. Rima Laibow, MD

   • Dr. Andrew Zywiec, MD

   • Dr. Paul Alexander, PhD

   • And several others, including researchers Dr. James Thorp, Dr. Jessica Rose, and Dr. Kevin McKernan.

The declaration also cites a recent peer-reviewed paper by Dr. Zywiec and colleagues.

The paper argues that the mRNA injections violated the Biological Weapons Convention.

Growing Movement Declaring Covid “Vaccines” Bioweapons

The AIN’s ruling follows similar declarations from other bodies, including the World Council for Health Florida chapter and multiple Republican Party organizations across the U.S., including in Idaho and Arizona, which have passed resolutions branding the shots as weapons of mass destruction.

Dr. Joseph Sansone, who helped present evidence to the Tribunal, called the ruling “extraordinary.”

Sansone, who has been leading the battle to formally declare the “vaccines” bioweapons, notes that it sets a historic precedent with global implications.

The Tribunal’s declaration lands at a moment of rising legislative and scientific pushback against the mRNA platform.

Bills like Minnesota’s HF3219 and mounting peer-reviewed evidence have already raised alarms about the risks of the injections.

Now, with an international tribunal formally branding the Covid shots as biological and technological weapons, critics argue the tide is turning against the global establishment that pushed the so-called “vaccines” onto billions of people.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/international-tribunal-declares-covid-shots-weapons-mass-destruction-global-law/

And,

READ MORE – Scientists Discover Hidden ‘Kill Switch’ Created by COVID-19 Virus