World Freedom

Blogger Comment: These are litertally crimes against humanity by the Globalist controlled Government if Canada where Carney was a top Davos Globalist and behind the scenes, still is….it is genocide in any other name, but the Canadian people are told differently and the majority believe their law makers who are basically taken them down a very evil path…

.

Two leading Canadian psychiatrists who helped implement their country’s “assisted suicide” system are now sounding the alarm, warning that the government is now killing patients who should never receive approval to be euthanized.

The psychiatrists, Dr. Gary Rodin and Dr. Madeline Li, delivered the warning in a New York Times opinion article this week, describing a system that has expanded far beyond a last-resort option.

Their concerns strike at the heart of assurances that Canada’s euthanasia regime is carefully controlled.

The warning comes from physicians who support assisted dying, have assessed patients for eligibility, and helped establish the procedures at one of Canada’s largest medical centers.

Now, those same doctors say the system is approving inappropriate cases and failing to give patients opportunities to reconsider before they’re killed with state-backed lethal injections.

Doctors Who Built the System Warn of Dangerous Failures

Rodin and Li are not outside critics of assisted dying.

Both have counseled patients and assessed their eligibility. One has administered the drugs used to end patients’ lives.

Together, they helped design an institutional framework for responding to assisted-death requests.

Their firsthand involvement makes their warning particularly stark.

“But Canada’s system for assisted death is no longer an option of last resort,” Rodin and Li wrote.

“Too many people are receiving the procedure without the opportunity for careful reflection about it with a health provider.

“In some cases, patients are being approved who should not be,” the psychiatrists wrote.

“Reports have emerged of people seeking assisted death in the context of poverty or loneliness, raising concerns that they may feel they have no other options.”

Even among cancer patients, Rodin and Li warned that “there’s a risk of rushing into it and shortening what can be a meaningful period in patients’ lives.”

Their account describes failures with irreversible consequences: people approved for death when they should not be, and others pursuing it while struggling with poverty, loneliness, or the belief that no alternative remains.

Assisted Death Now Accounts for 5% of Canadian Deaths

Rodin and Li described Canada’s system as “one of the most permissive in the world, allowing assisted dying for almost any form of subjectively intolerable suffering that has a medical basis, or even for medically unexplained physical symptoms.”

Assisted dying now accounts for approximately 5% of the country’s annual deaths.

The psychiatrists argued that assisted-suicide activists have largely driven policy, and said other medical professionals share their concerns.

Their warning challenges the portrayal of disturbing cases as isolated exceptions.

The problems they identify concern eligibility, access to counseling, and whether patients are being given meaningful alternatives before approval to end their lives.

Those are central safeguards, and the doctors’ account says they are failing some patients.

Woman Approved to Die After Losing Ability to Cook

One case described by Rodin and Li exposes the stakes.

A woman in her 70s had loved preparing large Sunday dinners for her family.

When she could no longer cook, she felt she had lost her value to them.

She sought assisted dying and received approval.

Counseling then helped her understand that her family valued her presence, rather than her ability to prepare meals.

“She sought and received approval for assisted dying after she lost the ability to cook,” Rodin and Li wrote.

“She felt she had lost her value to her family.

“Through counseling, she came to understand that her family valued who she was, not what she did for them.

“She decided not to go through with ending her life, at least for now.

“That Christmas, her family gathered and she sat proudly at the table, while others did the cooking and serving.”

The woman had already been approved to end her life.

After counseling, she chose to remain with the family she had feared she no longer mattered to.

That Christmas, she was alive to sit at their table.

An Alarm From Inside the Euthanasia System

The case illustrates exactly why the psychiatrists are demanding careful reflection and support before assisted death proceeds.

A patient’s conviction that she had lost her worth changed when someone helped her understand how her family actually saw her.

Yet approval to die had come first.

Rodin and Li’s warning leaves Canada’s euthanasia defenders confronting criticism from doctors who helped put the system into practice.

These physicians support assisted dying.

They have participated in it.

And they are now warning that the system is approving people who should not be approved, with death as the consequence when those failures are not caught in time.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/top-canadian-psychiatrists-sound-alarm-euthanasia-out-control/

And,

READ MORE – Canada’s Euthanasia Deaths Surpass U.S Gun Homicides

Blogger Comment: This is just ONE of the Globalist’s crimes against humanity, and that’s what all this is about…

.

Canada’s euthanasia campaign is escalating into a direct attack on Catholic hospitals, with the nation’s progressive establishment demanding that religious institutions begin euthanizing their patients or leave the healthcare system altogether.

Toronto’s Globe and Mail, the nation’s largest newspaper, published an editorial that presents Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program as an opportunity to secularize religious hospitals.

The demand exposes how the campaign once promoted as a matter of individual choice is now targeting institutions that refuse to participate in ending patients’ lives.

‘Get Out of the Business Altogether’

Andre Picard’s October 6 column, titled “It’s well past time for Catholic hospitals to be secularized,” singled out the country’s Catholic healthcare institutions.

“One hundred and twenty-nine of Canada’s 1,087 hospitals are Catholic,” Picard wrote.

“Most refuse to perform medical assistance in dying, abortion, tubal ligation, hysterectomy, vasectomy, gender-affirming care, or provide birth control to patients …”

The euthanasia advocate also targeted religious facilities caring for elderly and vulnerable residents.

“Many long-term care homes with religious affiliations also refuse to allow MAiD on their premises,” Picard wrote.

His conclusion left little room for those institutions to retain their principles.

“MAiD has become the catalyst for long-overdue change,” Picard wrote.

“Religious hospitals need to either offer care without discrimination or get out of the business altogether.”

The ultimatum turns refusal to participate in euthanasia into grounds for pushing Christian institutions out of healthcare.

Hospitals founded and operated to provide life-saving care are being told that their continued place in the system depends on abandoning convictions that prohibit deliberately ending a patient’s life.

From Personal ‘Choice’ to Institutional Pressure

The demand marks a stark escalation in the euthanasia movement’s ambitions.

The issue is no longer simply whether an individual can request assisted death.

It’s whether hospitals and care homes will be permitted to refuse involvement.

Picard explicitly identified MAiD as the catalyst for removing religious control from those institutions.

That puts the independence of Catholic healthcare providers, and access to facilities that do not administer euthanasia, directly in the campaign’s path.

The Globe and Mail’s role also matters.

Canada’s longtime paper of record has a documented history of using sustained editorial campaigning to push controversial changes onto the national agenda.

In his history of Canada’s abortion debate, F.L. Morton described the newspaper’s alliance with abortion-law reformers.

“Short-term success was unlikely without a sympathetic portrayal by the national media,” Morton wrote.

“Events are not ‘news’ unless they are reported. Reporters, editors, and producers have the discretion to ‘make news’ and to couch issues in either a positive or negative light.

“Normally, the policy recommendations of professional organizations are not front-page news, and politicians rarely feel pressed to respond to much else.

“It was thus the good fortune of the pro-(abortion) forces to find not just a friend but a veritable ally in the Toronto Globe and Mail.

“Beginning in 1961, the Globe and Mail mounted an editorial crusade for abortion law reform.

“Abortion-related news was routinely accorded front-page coverage, while scores of editorials were used to cheer reformers, chide the timid, and castigate the opposition.”

“By the fall of 1967, the Globe’s persistent and partisan coverage had achieved its intended effect,” Morton added.

“It had nudged the abortion issue out of the backwaters of legal and medical journals and onto the centre of Canada’s political agenda.”

The latest column similarly presents a sweeping activist demand as overdue reform: religious hospitals must conform or disappear from the system.

Patients Want Hospitals Where They Are Safe From MAID

The push ignores patients who specifically value institutions that refuse to provide euthanasia.

That concern extends beyond Christians.

Author Catherine Frazee, who has disabilities, explained why she and her partner would welcome care in a religious hospital.

“On the question of religious hospitals, despite being a lesbian couple, Patricia and I would tolerate life-size crucifixes in the treatment room if it meant being safe from MAiD,” Frazee wrote.

Her words expose what the secularization demand threatens to remove: a place where vulnerable patients can receive treatment knowing the institution will not participate in assisted death.

“If in a hundred years Christians are identified as people who do not kill their children or the elderly, we will have done well,” Stanley Hauerwas said.

For patients seeking protection from euthanasia, Catholic hospitals’ refusal is a reason to preserve them.

Picard’s proposal would make that same refusal grounds for forcing them out.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/canadian-establishment-demands-catholic-hospitals-begin-euthanizing-patients-get-out/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Government Euthanizes ‘Young and Healthy’ 26-Year-Old

Blogger Comment: A man from the Future of the Americ a and aptly put too…he is right, as all that Democrats do or progressives which is the big lie, is just dismantle and destroy western economies and this can eisily be seen clearly now throughout what has haopened and happing too the EU…you only have to look on ‘X’ to see this and the destruction throughout the EU….for have a look now and view the countless videos of this destruction going on right now…

.

A French artificial intelligence entrepreneur is warning Americans against voting Democrat, arguing that decades of progressive promises have left France burdened by debt, deteriorating public services, unaffordable housing, and recurring unrest.

Brivael Le Pogam, co-founder of AI company Argil, delivered the message in a viral X post Tuesday that drew support from conservative commentators and billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman.

“I’m French,” Le Pogam wrote.

“I want to talk to Americans who are about to vote Democrat.

“Not to insult you. To warn you.

“I come from your future.”

‘You Don’t Want to Be France’

Le Pogam argues that France’s expansive government spending, approaching 57% of GDP, has failed to deliver the prosperity promised by supporters of free healthcare, free college, and a strong welfare state.

“Here’s what it looks like from the inside,” Le Pogam wrote.

“France hasn’t passed a balanced budget since 1974.

“Our debt is above 3,300 billion euros.

“Interest on that debt is becoming one of the biggest items in the national budget.

“Our hospitals are collapsing despite record funding.

“Our schools rank lower every year.

“Young people with degrees can’t afford an apartment in the city they were born in.

“Our best engineers leave for London, Zurich and San Francisco.

“And the rich you wanted to tax?

“They left too, and took the jobs with them.”

His warning centers on the cumulative consequences of taxes, regulations, and government expansion rather than a single election.

“I love America because it’s the one place on Earth where people still believe they can build something from nothing,” Le Pogam wrote.

“I came to Silicon Valley as a self-taught kid, and it changed my life.

“That spirit is the most precious thing your country has.

“Before you vote, ask yourself one question: is the program you’re voting for making America more like America, or more like France?

“Trust me. You don’t want to be France.”

I’m French. I want to talk to Americans who are about to vote Democrat. Not to insult you. To warn you.

I come from your future.

In France we did everything your progressive politicians promise. Free healthcare, free college, generous welfare, strong unions, heavy regulation,… https://t.co/4q10Gu4NLh

— Brivael Le Pogam (@brivael) October 13, 2026

Ackman shared the post with his own endorsement.

“An important read on how we keep America from becoming France, from a Frenchman,” Ackman wrote.

Government Promises Become a ‘Trojan Horse’

In follow-up posts, Le Pogam challenged responses insisting that Democrats are not socialists and that America could never follow France’s path.

He argued that heavily subsidized sectors, including healthcare, education, and housing, have become increasingly expensive over the past 25 years, while products such as phones and software have become more affordable.

“That’s the Trojan horse,” Le Pogam wrote.

“It always works the same way. A real problem.

“A generous-sounding promise.

“A program that makes things worse.

“Then the failure of that program becomes the argument for the next one.

“People who lived under communism in Poland learned to recognize the lie and the mask the lie wears.

“The lie never presents itself as a lie.

“It presents itself as compassion.”

He urged Americans to examine that pattern rather than dismiss the warning along partisan lines.

“In France we are at the end of that road,” Le Pogam wrote.

“Debt we can never repay.

“Young people who can’t afford a home.

“Our best people leaving.

“And every few years our cities burn.

“Nobody voted for this.

“They voted for one more generous promise, fifty years in a row.

“If you’re a Republican, share this with the Democrat in your life.

“Not to win an argument.

“To start a conversation,” he said.

“If you’re a Democrat, I’m not asking you to switch teams.

“I’m asking you to look at the pattern.

“Wherever the state took over, life became unaffordable.

“Don’t fix the failures of government with more government.

“Stay American. Ask for less state, not more.”

Founder Backs Republicans

Le Pogam stands by his comments, describing the response as “very positive overall.”

He also explicitly endorsed the Republican Party’s approach to economic freedom and entrepreneurship.

“In general, I support the Republicans,” Le Pogam said.

“I believe their platform is currently the one that better protects the dynamism, individual freedom, and entrepreneurial spirit that make America unique — and that Europe (especially France) has largely abandoned.”

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/french-tech-founder-warns-americans-against-voting-democrat/

And,

READ MORE – Europe’s Communist Riots Spread from France to Belgium as ‘Migrants Join Forces with Antifa’

Blogger Comment: Clearly this Burnham guy thinks things up on the hoof or he is being told what to do by his Davos Globalist master…but of course Russia is responsible for everything…my money is on the master’s theory and he is doing as he is told by the Globalists… as he is member of this terrorist group if you did not know and for a very long time…

https://twitter.com/liz_churchill10/status/2069120219511918959/photo/1

British Prime Minister Andy Burnham is alleging that Russia rigged the 2016 Brexit referendum on Britain leaving the European Union as part of an effort to weaken the bloc.

However, the globalist leader has not publicly presented any evidence to support the claims, while one of Burnham’s own ministers says Moscow’s attempts did not succeed.

The allegations come after Burnham, who supported remaining in the European Union, floated the possibility of Britain rejoining the bloc last month.

Britain Unbound, a campaign group supporting British sovereignty, accuses Burnham of undermining the referendum’s legitimacy and insulting the voters who chose independence.

Prime Minister Offers No Details Behind Claim

Speaking during an interview on “The Rest Is Politics,” Burnham said he sought information about Russian activity after entering Downing Street.

“I asked the question coming to Downing Street, was there interference in the 2016 referendum from Russia?” Burnham said.

“And I’ve had the clear answer that yes, there was.

“And these things are important now to put clearly on the record, and I believe help voters in Germany and France understand that some of this politics is instigated via our enemies, namely Russia,” Burnham continued.

He did not explain what Russia allegedly did or provide evidence supporting his assertion.

British Foreign Office Minister Stephen Doughty subsequently told Sky News that Russia attempted to interfere but did not succeed.

“They do attempt to interfere in our processes, have attempted to interfere in a whole number of them, and of course, it’s not just Russia, it’s other countries, too,” Doughty said.

Britons voted 52% to 48% to leave the EU in June 2016.

The country formally departed on January 31, 2020.

Brexit Group Calls Remarks ‘Insulting’

Britain Unbound argues that Burnham’s remarks cast doubt on a democratic decision without establishing that foreign activity changed the result.

“There is no good reason to believe that Russian intervention influenced the outcome of the referendum in 2016,” the group wrote on X.

“It is also insulting to suggest that voters were so easily duped.”

A parliamentary inquiry into disinformation between 2017 and 2019 examined possible Russian interference.

Its report cited the government’s position that it had not seen evidence of the “successful use of disinformation by foreign actors, including Russia, to influence UK democratic processes.”

“It is not that they have not tried, but we have not seen evidence of that material impact,” then-Culture Minister Jeremy Wright told the committee.

Former Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who supported Brexit, also told the BBC in November 2019 that no evidence existed of Russian interference in British politics.

Burnham, by contrast, describes the years since Brexit as a “decade of drift and division” and has raised the prospect of returning to the EU.

Burnham Targets Germany’s AfD

Burnham also says he offered German Chancellor Friedrich Merz support against the right-wing Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party.

He described the populist AfD as a “threat” and relayed an allegation about its relationship with Moscow.

“[Merz] was saying to me that the AfD are clearly linked to Russia, funded, I believe,” Burnham claimed.

Burnham did not provide any evidence to support this allegation.

Following an October 8 meeting in Berlin, Burnham’s office announced a British-German partnership to counter sabotage and cyberattacks against critical infrastructure.

Russia has previously denied interfering in the Brexit referendum. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov issued a sweeping denial in July 2020.

“Russia has never interfered in the electoral processes of any country in the world, not the United States, not Britain, nor any other countries,” Peskov said.

Burnham’s allegations now reopen the political battle over Brexit, but he has yet to publicly prove that Russian activity altered the result, and his own minister says any attempted interference failed.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/british-prime-minister-claims-russia-rigged-brexit-vote-weaken-eu/

And,

READ MORE – UK Police Arrest 15-Year-Old Boy for Mocking Politician’s Clothes on Social Media

Blogger Comment: Zelensky and Piers Morgan…what a combination of intrigue that conjures up and would not trust either as far as I could throw them… for Trump is right here and where western MSM have never told the truth to the people in the West, and why Putin intervened in Ukraine, but where he did not invade to take over Ukraine and for only for one reason, from 2014 over 18,000+ Russian-speaking eastern Ukrainian civilian mothers, children, fathers, elderly people had been slaughtered by the Ukrainian army (mainly the Neo-Nazi Azov regiment where the Ukrainians in WW2 fought alongside with Hitler and the Nazis…and history has recorded all this…and today they are an even greater regiment of Neo-Nazis within Zelensky’s army, we are funding them through western Aid) from 2014 onwards and basically Putin had had enough of the human carnage and genocide against helpless civilians in eastern Ukraine next to the border with Russia… onwards and basically Putin had had enough of the human carnage and geocide against helpless civlians in eastern Ukraine next to the border with Russia…

https://www.rferl.org/a/azov-ukraine-s-most-prominent-ultranationalist-group-sets-its-sights-on-u-s-europe/29600564.html and, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoqZ8gPKKis and, https://odysee.com/@christhrall:2/ukraine’s-‘elephant’-in-the-room-azov:3 and https://odysee.com/@RusEmbIndia:0/about_Ukraine_nationalists_WW2_crimes:4 and, https://odysee.com/@alltheworldsastage:0/TLAV-Azov-Battalion-War-Crimes—Torture,-Murder,-and-Genocide:8

.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky accused President Donald Trump of betraying him during a “Piers Morgan Uncensored” interview, attacking a U.S. diesel arrangement with Russia and pressure on Ukraine to stop targeting Russian refineries.

The remarks follow Trump’s warning that refinery strikes threaten global diesel supplies and his announcement of an energy ceasefire.

Asked whether he felt betrayed, Zelensky answered: “Really, yes, between us.”

Zelensky Accuses Trump of Choosing the ‘Wrong Side’

Zelensky argued that Washington’s approach jeopardizes Ukraine’s relationship with its most important strategic partner.

“But uh I mean it’s a little bit uh more complicated than just my emotions or my feelings. Yes,” Zelensky said.

“It’s it depends not on my not on me.

“I mean this our our country has to survive and we count on our real partners strategic partners United States and President Trump they wanted us not to attack this my opinion was it’s not fair.”

He described the energy ceasefire as “the worst version of peace but anyway it’s some steps to the peace so the escalation.”

Ukraine nevertheless supported it, Zelensky said, “because we we we need our people to live to go through this winter and to stop the war.

“This is what we want.”

Zelensky also asserted that Ukraine had refrained from attacking energy facilities for three days while Russia struck Ukrainian gas facilities and infrastructure.

“Then I said that okay we will we will hold our emotions and we will not respond on diesel but believe me what I said American partners they will attack energy they will do it,” Zelensky said.

‘We Are Losing Strong Partner’

Zelensky portrayed the dispute as a deterioration in Ukraine’s relationship with Washington.

“It’s a pity that we are losing uh we are losing strong partner,” Zelensky said.

Asked whether Ukraine was losing America, he blamed Washington’s direction rather than his own government.

“Yeah. But but not because of us.

“We I mean this we can’t be weak otherwise we can’t survive otherwise we will we will just we are not selling our country.

“Look guys, it’s not about business for us; just our life and this is our country.

“It’s our body,” Zelensky continued.

“So our home, our children and and this is very important for us.

“That’s why it’s painful when President Trump chooses one side not not our side but we are okay that he’s in the middle but if you’re in the middle you have to stay in the middle not on the wrong side.”

He then turned his criticism toward Trump’s advisers.

“I think Trump’s advisers are wrong. I don’t know who is pushing him to the wrong side,” Zelensky said.

“This is not the right side of history.”

“Now Putin is laughing because, I mean this is for him, simple victory. This diesel deal,” Zelensky added.

WATCH:

JUST IN: 🇺🇦🇺🇸 Ukrainian President Zelensky says “Some big guys want to change me because I will never accept Ukrainian land as Russian land.”

He also adds “Not Trump, not Musk, not anybody in the world can choose the president of Ukraine. It’s the people of Ukraine that can do… pic.twitter.com/2GLEGFCZHI

— Megatron (@Megatron_ron) October 14, 2026

Trump Warns Refinery Strikes Threaten Global Supplies

Trump says his administration told Ukraine it could strike other targets but should stop attacking Russian refineries because “that’s a world problem” affecting diesel supplies.

He warned that Zelensky “better damn well stop” the strikes and suggested Ukraine “get a new leader who can make a deal.”

Trump also said Zelensky “could have settled this war many times” but chose not to.

The president subsequently announced a diesel arrangement with Russian President Vladimir Putin and declared an energy ceasefire “effective immediately,” saying both sides had agreed.

Ukrainian officials said they learned of the announcement through social media and had not confirmed mutual agreement beforehand.

The dispute puts Zelensky openly at odds with Trump’s effort to protect diesel supplies and advance an energy ceasefire, with the Ukrainian leader framing Washington’s pressure as a betrayal.

https://slaynews.com/zelensky-melts-down-accuses-trump-betraying-ukraine/

And,

READ MORE – British Prime Minister Claims Russia Rigged Brexit Vote to Weaken EU

Blogger Comment: The overall far-left is not the real destroyer of western civilization, but the Globalists who are using the far-left to do their bidding and a totally alien unheard of thing before, as the far-left once were known for totally hating the Globalist uber-rich and visa versa, so the real doers who are doing the Globalist bidding now in total disguise must be our western politicians who run in all political colours and are selling the people down the river now continuously every minute of the day for the Globalist elites…but where the people just cannot see it for some unfathomable and idiotic reason…

.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio delivered a blistering warning this week that the West’s embrace of the Left’s self-hatred has fueled its decline, leaving nations with open borders, weakened militaries, outsourced industries, and shrinking control over their own futures.

Speaking amid the ruins of Hellenic civilization in Greece, the birthplace of Western democracy, Rubio condemned the transformation of national pride into guilt.

The secretary took aim at those teaching children to be ashamed of their own countries.

“Our prosperity somehow became a word of guilt,” Rubio said.

“We no longer believe that we earned and deserved our greatness.”

Self-Hatred Comes With a Price

Rubio laid out the consequences of that retreat from confidence in Western civilization.

“In the process, we opened our borders, we outsourced our industries, and allowed our militaries to wither and decay,” Rubio said.

“With every passing year, we seem to outsource more of our sovereignty, transferring our decisions to global bureaucracies far beyond the reach of our control.”

His warning targeted more than rhetoric.

It described nations surrendering the industries, defenses, and decision-making authority necessary to remain independent.

The address came amid violence and mass disruption in France and Spain involving organized, unvetted migration from the Middle East and North Africa.

It also followed an attempted terrorist attack against a Royal Air Force base in the United Kingdom involving alleged Islamic radicals.

Rubio spoke on the third anniversary of the October 7 massacre in Israel, when Islamic terrorists murdered, raped, and kidnapped civilians in an attack that killed more than 1,200 people.

Teaching Children to Reject Their Inheritance

Rubio took direct aim at the vilification of nationalism and the campaign to tear down the West’s history.

“The word nationalism became a dirty word,” Rubio said.

“We tore down our monuments.

“We condemned our own history, and in too many places, we taught our children to be ashamed of the countries they would inherit.”

WATCH:

“The word nationalism became a dirty word.”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio says the West turned against the very things that once defined its strength, saying nations grew ashamed of their history, prosperity, and achievements.

“We tore down our monuments. We condemned our own… pic.twitter.com/GUSSu6lkr6

— Fox News (@FoxNews) October 7, 2026

The secretary’s message challenged the Left’s treatment of patriotism as something suspect and Western achievement as something requiring apology.

From the birthplace of Western democracy, Rubio pointed instead to a civilizational inheritance worth defending.

He referenced Greek philosophers whose ideas have shaped the West for more than 2,500 years.

In a separate social media post, Rubio said the West could “awaken from its long slumber – and rekindle the fire that was first lit in ancient Greece millennia ago.”

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/rubio-blasts-lefts-war-western-civilization-open-borders-global-bureaucrats-national-shame/

And,

READ MORE – Texas County Votes Unanimously to Crack Down on Sharia Law: ‘Not American’

Blogger Comment: All part of the Globalist’s 2030 plan to control the people and where Burnham is the new Globalist stooge on the block, to do their savagery on humanity in Britain…for they are the real harm factor doing it to their own people and if Burnham goes, their is another one always waiting in the wings that the Globalists call their chosen few and a doer against the people…always…as these politians are pure evil…as they are doing it to their own people without question and just like what the Nazis did to their own people in the 1930s…an exact carbon copy out of the Gobalist’s playbook…

.

The globalist UK government is preparing sweeping social media restrictions that would force all adults to undergo digital ID checks to access major platforms, extending a crackdown presented as child protection to users across the country.

Ministers are laying the groundwork for rules supposedly intended to keep under-16s off social media.

But the verification requirements would also reach adults, making access dependent on passing an age check rather than simply opening an account.

The proposed methods include passports, driving licenses, credit checks, and facial age estimation.

Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Snapchat, Facebook, and X are among the platforms expected to be targeted.

The restrictions are expected to take effect in spring 2027, with Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy previously identifying March as the launch date.

Adults Face Verification Gate

The government’s plan would require everyone opening a new account on affected platforms to undergo a facial check or upload identification.

That means adults would also face a verification barrier under rules promoted as a way to protect children.

The government’s fact sheet says proving someone is over 18 “could be as simple as a facial recognition check.”

For users unwilling or unable to complete the required checks, the system creates a direct obstacle to accessing social media.

The rules are being introduced through secondary legislation under the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026.

The government is also targeting platform features, extending the scope beyond a fixed list of apps.

Those features include infinite scrolling, autoplay, push notifications, and unsolicited contact.

Nandy said the goal is to “do proper, comprehensive legislation so that it doesn’t just incorporate the specific apps; it incorporates the features that we believe are not safe.”

The result is a broad verification regime affecting adults’ access to services they already use, justified through restrictions aimed at children.

Australia’s Ban Failed to Keep Most Children Off Platforms

The UK push follows evidence that children have widely circumvented similar restrictions in Australia.

More than 60% of children were found to still be using social media months after Australia’s ban took effect.

The British rules apply to platforms rather than directly to users, leaving VPNs as a potential route around the restrictions.

That could trigger another surge in VPN adoption.

When Britain introduced age checks for adult websites in July 2025, some VPN providers reported a 1,800% increase in signups.

The figures expose a central weakness in the approach: users can seek ways around the restrictions while those who comply must submit to additional checks.

Children who bypass the system may continue accessing the same platforms. Adults following the rules face demands to prove their age.

Government ID Checks Raise Data Security Concerns

The push also brings sensitive personal information into the verification process.

Discord suffered a major data leak after introducing age checks, providing a warning about the risks surrounding systems that collect identification documents.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has challenged the premise that universal age verification can reliably protect users’ privacy.

“There remains no reliable, privacy-preserving method of verifying the age of every internet user,” the EFF said.

Passports and driving licenses contain information users cannot simply replace like a compromised password.

Requiring those documents as a condition of online access raises questions about how they are collected, handled, and protected.

Facial checks offer another route through the proposed system, but still require users to undergo verification before gaining access.

Existing Checks Have Already Restricted Adults

Problems with age verification have already affected older British users.

Earlier this year, Apple’s iOS 26.4 age-check system left some UK users unable to prove their age because they lacked a credit card or photocard driving license.

A 67-year-old retired teacher had her browsing filtered because she pays for everything with a debit card.

That case illustrates how an age-check system can restrict an adult even when there is no question that the person is old enough to access the service.

The government is now preparing to extend verification requirements across major social media platforms.

Its stated objective is to keep children off those services.

But Australia’s experience shows that a ban does not guarantee children will stop using them, while Britain’s existing checks demonstrate that adults can be locked out.

The proposed rules would put millions of adults through new verification gates, with digital identification documents and facial scanning checks becoming the price of access to major online platforms.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/uk-government-moves-mandate-digital-id-checks-social-media-users/

And,

READ MORE – Digital ID Nightmare: 170 Million Americans’ and Canadians’ Identity Documents Stolen, Sold on Dark Web

Blogger Comment: Just one of the Globalist’s killing fields and nothing to see here but death as usual, as the Globalists get nearer to their golden year of 2030 and then the real killings start from 8.3 billion to less than 500 million by 2050….as they have said so…in Davos several times…but you have missed ity every time…

“WEF: ‘Big Winners’ Reduce Populations, ‘Substitute Humans with Machines” https://world-freedom.co.uk/2024/05/07/wef-big-winners-reduce-populations-substitute-humans-with-machines/

.

The Canadian government’s euthanasia regime has taken a chilling new turn after taxpayer-funded doctors were given the green light to euthanize a healthy woman because she had “lost her ability to cook,” arguing that the lethal injection was the only appropriate action because she had “lost her value.”

Canada’s socialist healthcare system approved a woman in her 70s for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) after she began believing that her role in her family had become diminished.

The woman ultimately chose to live after counseling helped her understand that her family loved her for who she was.

But approval to die had already been granted, and she was on track to be killed.

The chilling case was exposed by two psychiatrists who helped implement Canada’s assisted dying system.

They are now warning that people are being approved who should not be.

Gary Rodin and Madeline Li detailed the case in their October 5 New York Times opinion article, “We Implemented Canada’s Assisted Dying Law. We’re Concerned.”

Their warning comes alongside a separate family’s devastating accusation that an 83-year-old Christian grandmother was euthanized against her will while pleading for her life.

Approved to Die, Then Discovered Her Family Still Valued Her

The woman described by Rodin and Li had loved preparing large Sunday dinners for her family.

When she started to struggle to cook for large groups, she felt she no longer had anything to offer them.

“She sought and received approval for assisted dying after she lost the ability to cook,” Rodin and Li wrote.

“She felt she had lost her value to her family.

“Through counseling, she came to understand that her family valued who she was, not what she did for them.

“She decided not to go through with ending her life, at least for now,” the psychiatrists wrote.

“That Christmas, her family gathered and she sat proudly at the table, while others did the cooking and serving.”

Counseling changed her decision.

Instead of receiving a lethal injection, she lived to celebrate Christmas with the family she had feared she was failing.

The case exposes a disturbing failure: a woman who needed help understanding her worth had already been approved to end her life.

Doctors Who Built the System Sound Alarm

Rodin and Li support assisted suicide in principle.

Both have “counseled patients about the procedure and assessed whether they were eligible,” the psychiatrists wrote.

One has “administered the drugs to end patients’ lives,” they stated.

Their involvement extended to building the system itself.

Rodin and Li wrote that “together, we created an institutional framework that determined how one of Canada’s largest medical centers would respond to requests for assisted death.”

Now they are warning about its consequences.

“But Canada’s system for assisted death is no longer an option of last resort,” Rodin and Li wrote.

“Too many people are receiving the procedure without the opportunity for careful reflection about it with a health provider.

“In some cases, patients are being approved who should not be,” the psychiatrists wrote.

“Reports have emerged of people seeking assisted death in the context of poverty or loneliness, raising concerns that they may feel they have no other options.”

Even among cancer patients, Rodin and Li warned that “there’s a risk of rushing into it and shortening what can be a meaningful period in patients’ lives.”

These are warnings from doctors who participated in assisted dying, not merely critics observing it from outside.

They describe patients facing death without adequate reflection, inappropriate approvals, and requests shaped by poverty or isolation.

Euthanasia Accounts for Approximately 5% of Deaths

Rodin and Li described Canada’s regime as “one of the most permissive in the world, allowing assisted dying for almost any form of subjectively intolerable suffering that has a medical basis, or even for medically unexplained physical symptoms.”

Assisted dying now accounts for approximately 5% of Canada’s annual deaths.

In 2023, the Medical Assistance in Dying program accounted for 4.7% of deaths nationwide.

The psychiatrists argued that assisted-suicide activists have largely driven policy and said other medical professionals share their concerns.

The woman who chose to live illustrates the stakes of those concerns.

Her belief that she had become worthless was not permanent. Support helped change it.

The approval to end her life had come first.

Family Says Christian Grandmother Begged to Live

A separate case involves Brigitte Stegemann, an 83-year-old Ontario grandmother whose family says she was euthanized against her will.

Stegemann received a lethal injection under Canada’s taxpayer-funded MAiD program on July 10 at The Pearl care home in Canifton.

Her granddaughter and longtime caregiver, Brigitte Kranendonk, says Stegemann was confused, failed a cognitive assessment, and did not clearly consent on the morning of the procedure.

Stegemann had been diagnosed with stage 4 stomach cancer in February.

Doctors were uncertain whether she had six months or as long as two years to live.

Kranendonk said her grandmother had previously rejected assisted dying.

“No, I don’t want that,” Stegemann said, according to Kranendonk.

Her granddaughter said Stegemann’s Christian faith and fear of displeasing God were central to that opposition.

Nevertheless, while Kranendonk was away on a 10-day road trip, the care home informed her that her grandmother would undergo a MAiD assessment.

Confusion and Tears Before Lethal Injection

Kranendonk said she later witnessed a cognitive assessment during which Stegemann gave incorrect answers about her family.

Her grandmother said she had no siblings despite having 13 and incorrectly said none were still alive, according to Kranendonk.

The doctor still declared her eligible for MAiD.

Two days before the procedure, Kranendonk confronted her grandmother with what was scheduled to happen.

“Do you know that you’re going to die on Friday?” Kranendonk asked.

Stegemann cried for 45 minutes, according to her granddaughter.

“I’ve made a mistake,” Stegemann said, Kranendonk recalled.

Kranendonk repeatedly told her she could refuse.

“The doctors are coming on Friday, and you just say no,” Kranendonk recalled telling her grandmother.

Kranendonk described Stegemann’s distress by saying “she was bawling. Inconsolable.”

“I Don’t Want the Death Shot!”

On the day of the procedure, Kranendonk says her grandmother repeatedly removed a medical port intended to provide access to a vein.

“I don’t want the death shot!” Stegemann screamed, according to Kranendonk.

Her granddaughter said Stegemann was unresponsive when the doctor arrived.

According to Kranendonk, the doctor described the injection as medicine and asked whether it was acceptable.

Her grandmother did not open her eyes, nod, or speak, but the doctor proceeded.

Stegemann was pronounced dead within 10 minutes.

The account is the family’s allegation of what happened.

Kranendonk says the experience destroyed her trust in the institutions she expected to protect her grandmother.

“I was flying blind,” Kranendonk said.

The two cases deliver a devastating challenge to Canada’s euthanasia safeguards.

One woman was approved to die because she felt worthless after losing the ability to cook, then chose life after counseling.

Yet, doctors sought to euthanize the patient before treating her.

Another family says their grandmother’s pleas to live were followed by a lethal injection.

And doctors who helped establish the system are now warning that patients are receiving approvals they should never have been given.

https://slaynews.com/canadian-government-euthanizes-woman-losing-ability-cook/

And,

READ MORE – Man Saves Wife from Being Euthanized by Canadian Government, Flees to Texas for Cancer Treatment

Blogger Comment: As the IMF is a Globalist construct like them all, all they are doing here is stoking up the ‘fear’ ratcket in the people brains as usual and because their masters the Globalists create and cause all the disasters for humanity to basically make $ trilions continually….create the disaster like Covid and wars like Ukraine then say that you can fix it…and you have the complete revolving door that never stops and never stops making vast wealth and power…for the Globalists and out of mere fresh air…

.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has issued a stark warning that a collapse in artificial intelligence (AI) stocks could send shockwaves through international markets and trigger a devastating global financial crisis.

The warning comes as soaring valuations and massive borrowing expose the financial system to mounting risks.

In its latest Global Financial Stability Report, the IMF identifies an increasingly dangerous combination: concentrated technology investments, rising corporate debt, and complex financial relationships tying major companies to weaker AI businesses.

A sudden loss of confidence could force investors to sell, drive prices lower, weaken financial institutions, and spread turmoil far beyond Silicon Valley.

Seven Tech Giants Dominate More Than a Third of S&P 500

The IMF highlights the extraordinary concentration of market value in America’s largest technology companies.

Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla, the so-called Magnificent Seven, now account for more than 35% of the S&P 500.

A decade ago, their share was approximately 12%.

Their combined market capitalization has surged more than 50% in just two years, fueled by enormous expectations about AI’s future profitability.

But the IMF questioned whether those expectations will translate into sufficient revenue to justify today’s valuations.

Slower commercial adoption could undermine the assumptions behind the boom.

The organization is also warning that successful AI deployment might not require the enormous infrastructure spending technology giants are undertaking.

That raises questions about whether investors will see the returns they expect from the vast sums pouring into the sector.

Hundreds of Billions in Debt Magnify the Danger

Technology companies are spending heavily on data centers, advanced computing systems, and specialized processors, increasingly relying on borrowing and complicated financing arrangements.

The IMF identified approximately $300 billion in transactions between major infrastructure providers and financially weaker AI companies over the past three years.

Those arrangements were accompanied by approximately $650 billion in debt and an estimated $1.4 trillion in future financial commitments.

If expected AI revenues fail to materialize, those obligations could turn into a source of wider financial stress.

The IMF also flagged hedge funds and individual investors borrowing money to buy technology stocks.

A sharp price decline could force those investors to liquidate holdings, triggering further selling and accelerating losses.

The danger is a chain reaction in which falling shares force sales that drive prices down even faster.

Global Exposure Could Spread the Shock

Athanasios Vamvakidis, deputy director of the IMF’s Monetary and Capital Markets Department, emphasized that international exposure to American financial assets, particularly AI-related investments, has reached unprecedented levels.

Asian markets could suffer substantial repercussions because of their holdings in American technology stocks and their ties to semiconductor production and the wider technology industry.

European markets, including the United Kingdom and the euro area, may be better insulated, but their investors would remain exposed.

An American technology selloff could therefore become an international financial shock, affecting investment and confidence across multiple economies.

Government Borrowing and Cyberattacks Compound Risks

The IMF also identifies rising government borrowing costs and major cyberattacks as threats to financial stability.

Higher borrowing costs could put additional pressure on public finances.

An attack on financial infrastructure could disrupt transactions and undermine confidence at a moment when markets are already vulnerable.

Together, those risks could produce an abrupt tightening in financial conditions.

The IMF’s warning places the stakes of the AI boom in sharp focus as inflated expectations, borrowed money, and vast future commitments could turn a technology-sector reversal into a crisis reaching across global markets.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/imf-warns-ai-stock-collapse-unleash-global-financial-crisis/

And,

READ MORE – Bill Gates: AI Will Unleash Wave of ‘Negative Surprises’

Blogger Comment: The “Warning Man”, as Gates is the Globalist’s warning tool to tell humanity of an impending disaster for them and always has been…as they control him and all the other Tech giants that they have allowd to be created to control us…

.

Billionaire Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates has issued a chilling warning that criminals armed with powerful artificial intelligence (AI) are expected to unleash major cyberattacks, extortion schemes, financial disruption, and trigger widespread blackouts and shortages over the next year.

Gates warned that malicious actors are gaining access to the latest AI models without adequate safeguards, opening the door to increasingly sophisticated attacks on public utilities, businesses, and financial systems.

“When you have bad people, no safeguards, and then the latest models, that’s where, over the next year, primarily in the cyber area, we are going to have a lot of negative surprises,” Gates told CNN’s Jake Tapper on Sunday.

The warning comes as AI-enabled attacks are already surging, with cybersecurity researchers reporting an 89% increase in attacks by AI-enabled adversaries.

Criminals Could Use AI to Extort Businesses and Manipulate Markets

During the “State of the Union” interview, Gates said cybercrime offers attackers an established way to make money from AI-powered disruption.

“The front that we’ll probably see most dramatically in the next year is cyberattacks, because there, there’s a known business model where, you know, you threaten to do something and ask somebody to pay for that, or you create a disruption that changes something in the stock market or some betting thing that you go and do,” Gates said.

His warning extends beyond stolen information.

Criminals could threaten businesses into paying ransoms or deliberately disrupt systems to manipulate financial markets and betting outcomes.

CrowdStrike’s 2026 Global Threat Report found that attacks by AI-enabled adversaries increased 89% year over year in 2025.

The report also found that the average time criminals needed to move laterally through compromised networks had fallen to just 29 minutes.

That leaves defenders facing attackers who can spread through a breached network rapidly while exploiting increasingly powerful technology.

Gates Warns Governments Are Failing to Address Biological Danger

Tapper also pressed Gates over his warning that AI could help terrorists develop deadly biological weapons.

The host cited Gates’s assessment that the risk of a bioterrorist attack could become 50 times greater than that of a natural pandemic.

Asked whether government leaders were doing enough to prevent such an attack, Gates answered bluntly.

“Well, no, we’re not doing enough,” Gates said.

“The real danger right now is not the AI is [getting out of control].

“We need to work on that, but that’s years away in terms of the big impact that might have.”

Gates’s immediate concern is people weaponizing the technology.

Rather than waiting for a future rogue AI system, criminals and terrorists could exploit models already becoming available to carry out attacks.

WATCH:

Warning Fuels Push for Sweeping AI Regulation

Political strategist Oliver Libby responded by calling for government action while arguing that America must remain competitive in AI development.

“The great challenge both for innovators and governments in the coming months is to balance continued progress in AI with smart regulation,” Libby said.

“Leaders who can balance ensuring that America is not left behind, but that no American is left out, will win public trust.”

Libby also advocated federal and international standards, greater platform responsibility, and measures addressing AI-driven workforce disruption.

“Regulation should focus on federal and international standards, platform responsibility, cyber and deepfake penalties, child safety, and ensuring the participation of the population in the economic benefits of this powerful technological revolution — while starting to prepare our society for what could be profound workforce disruption,” Libby said.

Gates’s warning puts a much shorter timeline on the cyber threat, however.

He warns that, within the next year, criminals could use advanced AI to extort businesses and disrupt financial systems while governments remain unprepared for the wider dangers he described.

Folow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/bill-gates-ai-will-unleash-wave-negative-surprises/

And,

READ MORE – Bill Gates: AI Now ‘Powerful Enough’ to Eliminate One Billion Humans