Blogger Comment:UK politicians and UK Government Authorities knew what was going on for at least the past 50-years as it is the nature in a high proportion of Pakistani men to do this and because in their country it is normal apparently…but where the real culprits in all this crime against children in all this never-ending debauchery are the British politcians for allowing it to go on for decades, knowing full well what was happening to young undere age ‘white’ girls and where you never heard of a girl from the Pakestani fraternity being treated like this and continually that were worh less than animals in the minds of the perpetrators…so why the double standard other than they knew that they could get away with it with young under age white girls as the UK politicians had got their back, especially the far-left ‘Labour Party’ where they count on their vote for control and power over the UK…therefore simple really why it was allowed to happen and to go on for so many decades…but where no other civilised Western country would allow it…or any UK politian to ths day has been charged on a single count for this crime against humanity and western Christianity humanity at that…
.
A sweeping new inquiry into Britain’s notorious grooming gang scandal is renewing scrutiny of decades of child sexual exploitation and the repeated failure of authorities to protect vulnerable girls.
The Rape Gang Inquiry, led by survivor Sammy Woodhouse and former MP Rupert Lowe, examined organized groups accused of targeting children across the United Kingdom.
The report argues that predominantly Pakistani Muslim gangs were responsible for a significant portion of the group-based child sexual exploitation cases it examined, while police, social services, and other institutions repeatedly failed victims.
Frontlines TPUSA highlighted the findings in a video released Tuesday, arguing that the scandal should serve as a warning about what happens when institutions fail to confront uncomfortable realities while children remain at risk.
Inquiry Examines Backgrounds of Convicted Offenders
The inquiry found that roughly 87% of convicted offenders in the group-based child sexual exploitation cases it analyzed had “distinctively Muslim names.”
The figure applies specifically to the collection of group-based exploitation cases examined by the inquiry and does not mean Muslims were responsible for 87% of sexual offenses across Britain.
The report argues that authorities failed for years to adequately confront potential cultural and religious factors surrounding some perpetrators.
Its broader conclusions regarding religion and culture have generated controversy and are separate from the findings of Britain’s official government investigations.
The issue of ethnicity, religion, and culture is now expected to receive further examination through Britain’s statutory Independent Inquiry into Grooming Gangs, which was formally launched in April.
Survivor: ‘We Was Going Up Against the Entire System’
Woodhouse, one of Britain’s most prominent grooming gang survivors, has described being sexually exploited as a teenager in Rotherham.
She has accused authorities of possessing extensive information about perpetrators, victims, vehicles, locations, and trafficking methods while failing to intervene effectively to protect children.
In the Frontlines TPUSA video, Woodhouse recalled an encounter with police when she was 15 years old and had been reported missing.
“The police raided a property, and I was half naked in bed with him,” Woodhouse said.
“They actually arrested me and not him.”
Woodhouse said her abuser was allowed to walk free despite authorities possessing extensive information about the gang and its activities.
“We wasn’t just going up against him and his gang,” she said.
“We was going up against the entire system.”
The inquiry argues that such failures extended beyond individual police officers to social services, local authorities, and other institutions responsible for safeguarding vulnerable children.
TPUSA Warns America to Pay Attention
Frontlines TPUSA said the scandal should not be viewed solely as a British problem.
The organization is arguing that the institutional failures exposed by the inquiry carry lessons for the United States.
“This isn’t only Britain’s warning,” Frontlines TPUSA said.
“America should be paying attention.
“When institutions become more afraid of controversy than of failing children, the consequences can be catastrophic.”
WATCH:
The latest inquiry comes as Britain conducts its separate government-backed investigation into grooming gangs.
The statutory inquiry is expected to examine the institutional failures that left children vulnerable while also considering the role that ethnicity, religion, and culture may have played.
For survivors who have spent years demanding accountability, the investigations are placing renewed pressure on authorities to explain how organized groups were able to exploit vulnerable girls while the institutions charged with protecting them repeatedly failed to stop the abuse.
The central question is no longer simply how the gangs were able to operate for so long, but why authorities with responsibility for protecting children repeatedly failed to intervene.
Blogger Comment:These deadly infections by Bats will not kill according to real science, but mixing such things like Fauci did to creatre man-made pathogens, certainly will and that’s what the Globalists bank on to sell their big pharma injections and products as so-called cures to stop the so-called viruses, as Rockefeller did with the WW1 where he concocted a so-called vaccine that the American troops were given prior to sailing to Europe, once there the first so-called globalist vaccine infected both sides of the war and killed around 100 million people, not the guns and artillery, but what Rockefeller sold the American government on false and bogus pretences.., and that’s how Big Pharma started and on the back of deadly made up syrums that killed and were not a cure and just backed by the richest man in the world at the time (a globalist), just like Covid-19 jabs were…so nothings changed there now has it…
.
Scientists are sounding the alarm over a potentially catastrophic disease pathway involving northward-moving vampire bats and chronic wasting disease (CWD), the fatal neurological illness spreading through deer populations across North America.
Researchers warn that if vampire bats begin feeding on CWD-infected deer and later bite cattle, the animals could become a bridge for dangerous prion diseases to jump species.
That could create a scenario resembling the mad cow crisis, in which contaminated beef ultimately transmitted a fatal neurological disease to humans.
University of Minnesota associate professor Peter Larsen warns that the threat deserves far more attention.
“I don’t know why more people aren’t paying attention to this, because it gets scary really fast,” Larsen said.
Vampire Bats Are Moving North as CWD Spreads South
Vampire bats are nocturnal mammals native to Central and South America that survive exclusively on blood.
They have not yet established populations in the United States, but warming temperatures are pushing their range farther north through Mexico.
At the same time, chronic wasting disease continues spreading south through deer populations.
CWD has now been detected in 37 states.
Larsen said projections indicate the disease could eventually circulate across all of the lower 48 states, every Canadian province, and Mexico by 2030.
Surveillance in Mexico remains limited, but deer transported there from Texas ranches were later linked to facilities found to be CWD-positive.
That has raised fears the disease may already be circulating undetected south of the border.
“If I had to guess, I would say it’s 70 percent possible that there are already vampire bats feeding on [CWD-] positive animals in Mexico,” Larsen told CIDRAP.
Scientists Fear a Deadly Prion Chain Reaction
CWD is caused by malformed proteins known as prions.
These abnormal proteins destroy brain tissue, triggering severe neurological decline, behavioral changes, loss of coordination, and death.
A vampire bat feeding on an infected deer could ingest infectious prions through the animal’s blood.
Larsen said a single blood meal from an infected deer could contain several infectious doses, even before the animal begins showing symptoms.
As CWD progresses, infected deer often become disoriented and less mobile, making them easier targets for blood-feeding bats.
That is especially concerning on fenced ranches, where infected animals have fewer opportunities to move away.
The fear is that a bat exposed to CWD could later feed on cattle and introduce prions into a new species.
Scientists do not yet know whether that transmission would occur, but prion diseases have crossed species barriers before.
Mad Cow Crisis Shows the Danger Is Real
The most notorious example remains the mad cow crisis of the 1980s and 1990s.
Humans who consumed contaminated beef developed variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, a fatal neurological disorder caused by prions.
The outbreak killed 178 people, most of them in the United Kingdom.
Researchers have also proposed that CWD itself may have emerged after mule deer housed near sheep were repeatedly exposed to scrapie, another deadly prion disease.
That hypothesis remains unproven, but Larsen warned that species barriers should not be treated as impenetrable.
“I don’t think the species barrier is absolute. I think it’s porous,” Larsen said.
“I think it’s likely that CWD will cause prion disease in other species, including humans, and that it’s just a matter of time.”
Experts Warn the Threat Could Grow Fast
There is currently no evidence that vampire bats transmit CWD, that cattle have contracted the disease from deer, or that CWD has infected humans.
But the geographic trends are moving in the wrong direction.
CWD is spreading through more deer populations while vampire bats continue moving north.
That means the two threats are getting closer to overlapping.
Larsen warned that if infected deer and vampire bats are already interacting in Mexico, the conditions for a dangerous species-jump experiment may already exist in the wild.
Former Montana state veterinarian Martin Zaluski said the chain of transmission remains unlikely and stressed that prion diseases generally stay confined to individual species.
Even so, the mad cow crisis proved that once a prion disease breaks through into the food chain, the consequences can be devastating.
The warning from researchers is clear: the time to study the threat is before vampire bats, infected deer, cattle, and humans become links in the same deadly chain.
Blogger Comment:We know that Trump is no saint, but things are better in the US now for the American people…but he has made one major mistake that all US presidents make with his involvement with Iran and that was not well thought out from the very start…as Iran was no imminent threat to the USA or the West, the decision that caused energy and especially petrol prices to skyrocket and NOT a great judgement at all for re-election prospects…basically shooting himself and the Republics in the foot just for the highly toxic leadership of Israel and where the people of Israel never wanted a war with Iran, but wanted to leave it to the inspections by the interbational nuclear watchdog…
.
Energy giants ExxonMobil and Chevron warned Friday that Americans are unlikely to see relief at the gas pump anytime soon, citing ongoing supply disruptions tied to the Iran conflict that continue to squeeze global fuel markets.
The warnings came as both companies posted massive second-quarter profits, driven in large part by soaring refining margins as diesel, gasoline, and other refined petroleum products remain in short supply.
ExxonMobil reported second-quarter earnings of $14.5 billion, more than doubling its profit from the same period last year.
Revenue climbed 42% to $116 billion.
Chevron also posted a strong quarter, reporting $12.1 billion in earnings on roughly $70 billion in revenue.
Refining Bottlenecks Keeping Fuel Prices Elevated
Executives at both companies said today’s fuel prices are being driven less by crude oil costs and more by a shortage of refining capacity.
They pointed to multiple factors constraining global fuel supplies, including disruptions to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz stemming from the conflict with Iran, declining fuel exports from China, and refinery outages in Russia following attacks on energy infrastructure.
ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods said those disruptions have reduced global refining capacity by nearly 9%.
Speaking with CNBC, Woods cautioned motorists not to expect lower prices in the near future.
“I wouldn’t hold my breath here in the short term,” Woods said when asked whether gasoline prices could soon fall.
“I think we’re going to see prices consistent with what we’re experiencing for quite a while yet.”
‘Disconnect’ Between Crude Oil And Pump Prices
Woods said the traditional relationship between crude oil prices and gasoline prices has broken down because refining capacity, not crude supply, is now the primary constraint.
“There’s a disconnect today because now we have a refinery constraint,” Woods explained.
“So pump prices are being established by the supply and demand of refining petroleum products, not crude.”
“That’s one of the reasons why we haven’t seen crude rise as quickly as people have thought or we didn’t see product prices fall as crude prices came down because there is this disconnect in the marketplace.”
Woods said the situation is unlikely to improve until shipping through the Strait of Hormuz fully normalizes and global fuel inventories are replenished.
“But until you get flows established in resupplying the marketplace, I think we’re going to see prices consistent with what we’re now experiencing for quite a while yet as we’ve got to get the strait opened up and then we’ve got to resupply the inventories and get things moving,” he said.
“So I wouldn’t hold my breath here in the short term for that.”
“The second quarter had so much disruption, particularly for our refining business," says $XOM CEO Darren Woods after the company reported an earnings miss despite a surge in overall profit. https://t.co/rZR82kj0QWpic.twitter.com/DpQgIDeFb3
Chevron CEO Mike Wirth delivered a similar assessment during the company’s earnings call.
“We’re going to see some upward pressure on product pricing… into the third quarter and perhaps beyond that,” Wirth said.
He added that demand for distillate fuels, including diesel and heating oil, remains strong, while inventories of gasoline and other refined products remain unusually low.
Chevron also reported record throughput at its U.S. refineries of more than one million barrels per day as the company works to maximize production.
Tight Supplies Could Last For Months
U.S. gasoline prices had already climbed above $4 per gallon before the companies released their earnings.
The outlook could become even more challenging as refineries enter scheduled maintenance during the third quarter, temporarily reducing production capacity.
Chevron estimated planned maintenance would reduce downstream earnings by between $175 million and $225 million during the current quarter, while ExxonMobil said its maintenance schedule would be somewhat lighter than in the previous quarter.
Both companies indicated that even if crude oil prices moderate, consumers could continue paying elevated prices for gasoline and diesel until global shipping routes stabilize and fuel inventories are rebuilt.
Woods also warned that reopening the Strait of Hormuz alone will not immediately resolve the problem, noting that shipping companies are likely to remain cautious before returning vessels to the region, potentially extending supply constraints well beyond the end of the conflict.
Blogger Comment:Those with their ear to the ground knew that there was a massive cover up going on for the CCP when Biden and the Democrats were in power…corruption at the highest level that the American people were never told, as the Globalist elites (and the CCP passively) controlled Biden and his Administration… corrupt government is no answer for anything, but that’s how the top in the Demoicratic Party operate it definitely appears…
.
Dr. Anthony Fauci’s longtime senior advisor has pleaded guilty in federal court after admitting to participating in a conspiracy to conceal government records while working to restore taxpayer funding for EcoHealth Alliance and undermine the theory that COVID-19 leaked from a Chinese laboratory.
Dr. David Morens, who served for years as a senior advisor to Fauci at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), entered a guilty plea Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Greenbelt, Maryland, to conspiracy to commit offenses against and defraud the United States.
The plea follows years of revelations stemming from Morens’ own emails, in which he openly discussed using private Gmail accounts to evade Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and make government communications “disappear.”
DOJ Says Morens Worked to Restore EcoHealth Funding
According to the Justice Department, the conspiracy began after the NIH terminated EcoHealth Alliance’s grant, “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.”
The grant had routed U.S. taxpayer money through EcoHealth Alliance to the Wuhan Institute of Virology before being canceled in 2020 amid growing scrutiny over COVID-19’s origins.
Prosecutors say Morens and his co-conspirators agreed to help EcoHealth recover the canceled funding while working to “counter the narrative that COVID-19 leaked from a lab.”
Under Tuesday’s plea agreement, Morens admitted the conspiracy lasted from approximately April 2020 through at least June 2023.
In exchange for his guilty plea, prosecutors agreed to dismiss the remaining charges contained in a five-count federal indictment, including destruction and concealment of federal records and falsification of documents during a federal investigation.
Those charges each carried potential prison sentences of up to 20 years.
Morens now faces up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release, and a fine of up to $250,000.
U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis scheduled sentencing for Nov. 12.
Secret Gmail Used to Evade FOIA
Court filings show Morens and his co-conspirators deliberately agreed to move official government business onto his personal Gmail account rather than his NIH email account because they anticipated the communications would eventually become subject to FOIA requests.
According to the plea agreement, Morens used the private email account to exchange non-public NIH information, discuss strategies for restoring EcoHealth Alliance’s funding, edit draft letters supporting the nonprofit, and relay back-channel communications concerning senior NIAID leadership.
The government states those communications constituted official federal records that legally belonged on government systems.
Wine, Favors, and ‘Behind-the-Scenes Shenanigans’
The plea agreement also details Morens’ discussions regarding illegal gratuities.
According to prosecutors, an EcoHealth associate sent two bottles of wine to Morens’ Maryland home in June 2020 as thanks for his “behind-the-scenes shenanigans.”
Morens responded by identifying an official act he could perform in return.
According to the DOJ, he proposed writing a scientific commentary supporting the claim that COVID-19 originated naturally rather than leaking from a laboratory.
The co-conspirator later suggested additional rewards, including meals at Michelin-starred restaurants in Paris, New York, and Washington, D.C.
Emails Show Plan to Make Records ‘Disappear’
Much of the government’s case traces back to emails uncovered by the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic.
Those messages showed Morens openly describing how he avoided public records laws.
“As you know, I try to always communicate on gmail because my NIH email is FOIA’d constantly,” Morens wrote.
In another email, he added:
“I delete anything I don’t want to see in the New York Times.”
In February 2021, Morens described learning techniques from an NIH FOIA official.
“I learned from our foia lady here how to make emails disappear after i am foia’d but before the search starts, so I think we are all safe.
“Plus I deleted most of those earlier emails after sending them to Gmail.”
Months later he wrote:
“I have retained very few emails or documents on these matters.”
Emails Also Mentioned Fauci’s Private Gmail
One email also referenced Fauci directly.
“There is no worry about FOIAs,” he wrote.
“I can either send stuff to Tony [Fauci] on his private gmail, or hand it to him at work or at his house.
“He is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble.”
Fauci later testified before Congress that Morens did not advise him on institute policy and said he was unaware of Morens’ email practices.
Fauci also denied using personal email for official government business, although he acknowledged Morens’ actions violated NIH policy.
Investigation Continues to Expand
Morens’ emails prompted Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) to request a criminal investigation in 2024.
Following Morens’ indictment earlier this year, then-Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche accused him and his co-conspirators of deliberately concealing records to suppress competing theories regarding COVID-19’s origins.
A Senate committee recently voted to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress after he repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment during testimony about his role in the government’s pandemic response.
Although former President Joe Biden issued Fauci a sweeping pardon covering conduct between Jan. 1, 2014, and Jan. 19, 2025, lawmakers continue investigating what they describe as a coordinated effort by government officials to conceal records, suppress debate over COVID-19’s origins, and shield key decisions from public scrutiny.
Blogger Comment:Think that the UK government is not evil, then read on what Trump’s top regarded independent news outlet in America says about the UK…these people based upon evidence and their controlled environment by the Globalists who are their controlled servants, is that they do not show any allegiance to the UK people, but for the richest elites in the world to do their bidding…so when the people vote, they are not voting for the people. but for the Davos WEF elites…as the article below states, …the British government will have crossed a profound boundary: from advising citizens what medicine they should take to putting that medicine directly into their food…for population reduction is one of the Globalists main agendas and where this is not a few million, but billions of human lives…and unborn human lives fits into this agenda as well…
.
The UK Government will begin adding a drug to the nation’s flour that is known to trigger miscarriages in pregnant women, arguing that it’s necessary for the “greater good,” exposing tens of millions of people to the substance through everyday foods, regardless of whether they want it.
The move will mandate the mass-medicating of the population by forcing commercial flour producers to add synthetic folic acid to the nation’s food supply.
Beginning December 13, 2026, virtually all non-wholemeal wheat flour produced by major British mills must contain synthetic folic acid under government regulations approved without a vote on the floor of the House of Commons.
The mandate will expose tens of millions of people to the substance through bread and countless other everyday foods whether they need it or not.
There will be no prescription.
There will be no individualized dosage.
There will be no medical screening.
And there will be no meaningful way for most consumers to avoid it.
The government argues that forcing folic acid into staple foods serves the “greater good” by reducing neural tube defects during pregnancy.
But evidence underpinning the policy includes a major randomized trial in which significantly more pregnancy losses occurred among women receiving folic acid-containing supplements.
The same substance also carries warnings from the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) for people with certain medical conditions.
Nevertheless, Britain is about to put it into the food supply for everyone.
Government Will Force Synthetic Folic Acid Into Flour
Folic acid is routinely marketed as “vitamin B9.”
It is not the naturally occurring form of vitamin B9.
Natural vitamin B9 is folate, a reduced molecule required by cells throughout the body.
Folic acid is a synthetic oxidized compound that must be converted by the body before it can be used.
When sold separately, folic acid is regulated as a licensed medicine and supplied with a patient information leaflet detailing contraindications, drug interactions, and circumstances in which medical advice should be sought.
The NHS specifically warns some patients not to take folic acid without consulting a doctor.
But from December, that same substance will be routinely added to one of Britain’s most widely consumed food ingredients.
A government minister was asked in Parliament what people who have already been advised to avoid folic acid are supposed to do when it is added to flour.
The government’s answer was that patients should read the leaflet supplied with their medicine and consult their doctor.
There is one obvious problem.
A loaf of bread does not come with a drug information leaflet.
Mandate Takes Effect December 13
The Bread and Flour (Amendment) Regulations 2024 require commercial mills producing more than 500 metric tons of flour annually to add 250 micrograms of folic acid to every 100 grams of non-wholemeal wheat flour.
The regulations were introduced through a statutory instrument.
There was no vote on the floor of the House of Commons.
The rules transformed folic-acid fortification from something previously prohibited into something the government will now force major producers to do.
Wholemeal and gluten-free flour are exempt.
For most consumers, however, avoiding fortified flour will be extremely difficult.
The milling industry’s own trade body says flour is present in roughly 30% of products on supermarket shelves.
Approximately 99.8% of British households buy bread.
Folic acid is already appearing voluntarily in foods ranging from sausages and meat substitutes to soup, gravy products, and flavored milk drinks.
Once mandatory fortification begins, repeated exposure throughout the day will become routine.
The actual amount consumed will depend on what each person eats.
That means children, adults, pregnant women, cancer patients, elderly people, and everyone else will receive different uncontrolled doses through their diet.
Pregnancy Trial Recorded Significantly More Fetal Deaths
The most alarming questions surround the very evidence used to justify the policy.
One major randomized trial examined folic-acid supplementation among women without an elevated risk of neural tube defects.
The Hungarian study, led by Andrew Czeizel and reported fully in 1994, recorded six neural tube defects in the control group and none among women receiving a multivitamin containing folic acid.
That result became foundational to global folic-acid policy.
But the same study recorded something else.
Every category of pregnancy loss, including miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, stillbirth, and other fetal deaths, was higher in the group receiving the folic-acid-containing supplement.
Combined, there were approximately 70 additional pregnancy losses in that group.
The difference was statistically significant.
The neural tube defect result became the headline used to drive folic-acid policy around the world.
The pregnancy-loss result did not.
After adjusting for the higher conception rate in the treatment group, critics calculate that the trial recorded approximately nine additional fetal deaths for every neural tube defect prevented.
Researchers Raised ‘Terathanasia’ Possibility
The finding troubled Czeizel himself.
In 1997, Czeizel and epidemiologist Ernest Hook published a paper in The Lancet examining whether folic acid could be preventing recorded neural tube defects by causing pregnancies involving seriously damaged fetuses to terminate earlier.
They called the proposed mechanism “terathanasia.”
In other words, the apparent reduction in babies born with neural tube defects could potentially have reflected the selective loss of affected pregnancies rather than prevention of the defect itself.
Clinical geneticist Judith Hall responded that pathological examination of the lost pregnancies would be highly desirable.
Yet the central question was never definitively resolved.
Nearly three decades later, the British government is preparing to expose almost the entire population to folic acid through staple food.
Government’s ‘200 Babies Saved’ Claim Falls Apart Under Scrutiny
Officials repeatedly promote mandatory fortification using the claim that approximately 200 pregnancies affected by neural tube defects could be prevented each year.
But the government’s own more recent assessment produces a dramatically different picture.
Its model estimates just 31 fewer affected live births annually in England.
Around 28 involve children who would otherwise be born with disabilities.
Approximately three involve fatal cases of anencephaly, in which major portions of the brain and skull fail to develop.
Much of the remainder of the celebrated “200” figure comes from projected reductions in abortions performed after prenatal scans identify neural tube defects.
Yet the public-facing message has repeatedly been framed around saving hundreds of babies.
The government’s own numbers show something very different.
Millions Exposed for Benefit Affecting Tiny Fraction of Population
Britain has a population approaching 70 million.
Almost all of those people can receive no pregnancy-related benefit whatsoever from mandatory folic-acid fortification in any given year.
Men cannot benefit from the stated purpose.
Children cannot benefit.
Post-menopausal women cannot benefit.
Millions of other women will not be pregnant.
Nevertheless, all will be exposed.
The government has therefore chosen to medicate an entire food supply to target a comparatively tiny section of the population.
The policy becomes even more bizarre because chapati flour is exempt despite Bangladeshi mothers having a disproportionately high risk of neural tube defects.
NHS Warns Cancer and B12 Patients
The government’s own health service already acknowledges that folic acid is not appropriate for everyone without medical consideration.
The NHS advises people with certain conditions, including vitamin B12 deficiency and some cancers, to seek medical advice before taking it.
Britain has approximately 3.5 million people living with cancer, with more than 400,000 new diagnoses each year.
Vitamin B12 deficiency is also common, particularly among older adults.
Folic acid can mask the blood abnormalities caused by B12 deficiency while neurological damage continues.
That damage can become permanent.
Yet those patients will soon encounter synthetic folic acid simply by eating ordinary foods made with mandated flour.
NHS Quietly Removed Warnings as Mandate Approached
As implementation of the policy approached, warnings relating to dialysis and coronary stent patients disappeared from the NHS folic-acid guidance.
Internal records obtained through freedom-of-information requests showed that the dialysis warning was removed because staff described the evidence as “confusing.”
There was no recorded justification for removing the stent warning.
When challenged in Parliament, the responsible minister said the NHS page had simply been made shorter and easier to understand.
No new clinical trial demonstrating safety was cited.
The stent warning was subsequently restored after a member of the public challenged the change.
The dialysis warning remains absent.
No Safe Upper Level Established for Children
There is another major problem.
British experts were unable to establish a conventional safe upper intake level for folic acid.
Instead, authorities adopted a guidance level because the evidence surrounding adverse effects was inadequate.
For children, no safe upper level was established because there was insufficient evidence.
Yet children will consume fortified flour every day.
The amount will depend on how much bread, cereal, pastries, pizza, processed food, and other flour-containing products they eat.
The government will mandate the dose in the flour.
Nobody will control the total dose entering each child’s body.
Cancer Signal Raises More Questions
A pooled analysis of randomized trials has also raised concerns over cancer incidence at folic-acid doses relevant to fortification.
Using individual-level trial records, cancer incidence was 23% higher in lower-dose folic-acid groups.
Using published trial summaries, the increase was 18%.
The same signal did not appear at doses above one milligram.
When all dosage levels were combined, the difference disappeared.
The lower-dose findings are particularly relevant because mandatory food fortification operates within that lower exposure range.
Nevertheless, Britain is pressing forward with population-wide exposure.
No Ethics Assessment, No Full Risk-Benefit Analysis
The government did not publish a dedicated ethical assessment examining whether it is acceptable to medicate an entire population without individual consent.
Nor did it conduct a full medical risk-benefit assessment balancing the predicted reduction in neural tube defects against potential adverse effects across tens of millions of people.
Instead, the government conducted a financial assessment.
That document acknowledged potential harms involving cancer patients and people with undiagnosed B12 deficiency.
Those harms were classified as “non-monetised effects.”
Their assigned financial value was effectively zero.
The government’s economic defense is that adding folic acid costs almost nothing.
The estimated cost is roughly 0.008 pence per loaf.
But the price of the chemical was never the central issue.
The issue is whether a government should be able to put a licensed synthetic medicine into staple food and expose nearly 70 million people without their consent.
WHO Ties Fortification to 2030 Agenda
The World Health Organization promotes folic-acid fortification as part of efforts linked to the United Nations’ 2030 Sustainable Development Goals.
Yet WHO itself has rated the certainty of evidence behind parts of its recommendation as low or very low.
Mandatory fortification is also far from universal across Europe.
Only Moldova and Kosovo mandate it (Globalist controlled nations).
No Western European country currently does.
Britain’s own Food Standards Agency rejected mandatory fortification in 2002 because of concerns surrounding vitamin B12 deficiency and consumer choice.
Those concerns have now been swept aside.
Britain Crosses an Extraordinary Line
This policy goes far beyond telling pregnant women to take a vitamin.
The government is altering the nation’s staple food supply.
It is forcing commercial producers to add a synthetic medicine consumed by almost everyone.
People who have been told to seek medical advice before taking folic acid will consume it.
Children will consume it despite authorities having no established safe upper intake level for them.
Millions of people who can receive absolutely no benefit from preventing pregnancy-related neural tube defects will consume it.
And they will consume different amounts depending entirely on their diets.
No prescription.
No informed consent.
No individualized dose.
No Commons vote.
No comprehensive ethics review.
No full medical risk-benefit assessment.
The mandate begins December 13.
By then, the British government will have crossed a profound boundary: from advising citizens what medicine they should take to putting that medicine directly into their food.
A petition is now seeking to force Parliament to finally debate what is about to be done to the entire country.
Blogger Comment: Canada is one of the Globalist’s heartlands for undertaking their malevolent work and where their PM Carney was one of the WEF’s inner executive powerhouses prior to becoming Canadian Prime Minister and still is in the background…so allowing evil individuals loose is the way that the Globalists operate and allow highly toxic criminals from not doing time is the evil side of totalitarian governments and where in the UK as a further example, their goivenment is going to release thousands of rape and murder criminals early onto the streets and the people of the United Kingdom again soon, and as the start of an ongoing new UK government phase of madness from the WEF Globalists and where most of the western nations are now controlled by the Davos elites through their controlled prime ministers, presidents, chancellors and cabinet ministers…
.
Canadian authorities are facing criticism after charging a man accused of threatening to bomb a U.S. consulate with relatively minor offenses despite a major police response involving bomb squads, evacuations, and suspicious materials found near the American diplomatic mission.
The arrest marks the third recent attack or threat targeting a U.S. consulate in Canada, raising fresh questions about the country’s handling of attacks against American diplomatic facilities.
Halifax Regional Police arrested 54-year-old Ali Assakereh on Monday after the U.S. Consulate General in Halifax reported receiving a bomb threat Sunday evening.
Investigators quickly identified Assakereh as the suspect and launched a search.
Bomb Squad Called After Propane, Flammable Materials Found
Police eventually located Assakereh’s vehicle parked in a garage adjacent to Purdy’s Wharf, the office complex that houses the American consulate.
Inside the vehicle, officers discovered a propane tank, multiple canisters believed to contain flammable liquids, and a suspicious bag.
The discovery triggered a full-scale emergency response.
Authorities evacuated the surrounding area, closed nearby roads, and called in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Explosive Disposal Unit.
“Given the concern that he may be in possession of explosives, road closures were in place for much of the day on Thomas Raddall Drive and surrounding areas while his belongings were searched with the support of the RCMP Explosive Disposal Unit,” Halifax Regional Police said.
Assakereh was later arrested at a residence in Halifax’s Clayton Park neighborhood.
Despite Bomb Threat, Canada Files Minor Charges
Despite the dramatic police response, Canadian authorities ultimately charged Assakereh only with uttering threats and public mischief.
The reduced charges reportedly came after explosives experts concluded the materials found inside the vehicle did not pose an immediate explosive threat.
Authorities have released no information regarding Assakereh’s motive or background.
Halifax Regional Police also said they are not currently treating the incident as a national security investigation.
The result is that a man accused of making a bomb threat against an American diplomatic facility—whose vehicle was found nearby containing propane and flammable materials—is facing charges that carry nowhere near the severity typically associated with terrorism cases.
Third Recent Attack Targeting U.S. Consulates
The Halifax incident is the latest in a disturbing series of attacks targeting American diplomatic facilities across Canada.
In March, gunfire erupted outside the U.S. Consulate in Toronto.
Authorities arrested 18-year-old Sheldon Tracy-Stewart, charging him with committing “a violent attack on the official premises of an internationally protected person,” along with motor vehicle theft and possession of stolen property.
Then, in July, Canadian authorities arrested two more suspects following another shooting targeting the same Toronto consulate.
Police identified one suspect as 19-year-old Xen-Ul Abdeen Syed.
The second suspect was just 15 years old and was not publicly identified.
Investigators said the suspects had been recruited through encrypted messaging applications and offered money to attack the American diplomatic mission.
Police also said the March shooting appeared to have been carried out under a similar crime-for-hire arrangement.
Pattern of Attacks Raises Serious Questions
Canadian authorities have not announced any connection between the Halifax bomb threat and the Toronto shootings.
Nor have investigators publicly identified who allegedly financed or orchestrated the attacks against the U.S. consulate in Toronto.
But within just a few months, American diplomatic facilities in Canada have been targeted by multiple shootings and an alleged bomb threat.
In the latest case, authorities evacuated a city block, deployed bomb technicians, recovered propane and flammable materials near the U.S. consulate, and ultimately charged the suspect with uttering threats and public mischief.
For critics, the outcome raises obvious questions about whether Canada is treating repeated threats against American diplomatic facilities with the seriousness they deserve.
Blogger Comment:This is at the Heart of the Globalist plan to destroy the family unit and for the state to take over all the offspring and has been stated for decades, but now they wish to bring this destructive force to humanity to fruition over the next few years when families as we know them will not exist…ever again…how evil is that you should ask yourself…
.
A Yale professor argued that America should consider giving younger voters greater political power, including potentially allowing young adults to cast proxy votes on behalf of children, while claiming parents may not be best positioned to represent their own kids’ interests.
Yale Law School professor Samuel Moyn floated the proposal during an appearance on the New York Times podcast “Interesting Times,” hosted by Ross Douthat.
Moyn was discussing his book “Gerontocracy in America,” which argues that older Americans have accumulated disproportionate control over wealth, housing, employment, and political power at the expense of younger generations.
“I’ve gotten in some hot water for proposing we consider overweighting the votes of younger people or assigning the youngest eligible voters proxy votes for the unrepresented children of our country,” Moyn said.
Douthat immediately asked the obvious question.
“Why not assign them to those children’s parents?”
Moyn rejected the idea.
“Because there’s a divergence of interests between parents and children,” he said.
“I think it’s likelier that young people—not people who are raising families—will have the best insight into the interests of children.”
Yale Professor Says Children Shouldn’t Be ‘Hostages’ Of Parents
Moyn went further, arguing that parents frequently mistake the interests of the family for those of their children.
“I think parents generally confuse the interests of their family with the interests of their children,” Moyn said.
“I think part of our goal as parents, but also as a society, is trying to make sure that children aren’t the hostages of their parents, as much as we rely on parents to raise them.”
Douthat rejected the argument outright.
“I think that’s daft,” he said.
“I think it’s absurd to imagine that a 24-year-old recent college graduate has a better assessment of the interests of my own children than I do.
“And I say this with all due respect to 24-year-old recent college graduates, of whom I hope to be the parent of in nine years or so.”
Douthat later joked that his experience suggested that “parents are more likely to be the hostages of their children.”
WATCH:
Critics Say Proposal Treats Families as Political Power Struggles
The exchange quickly drew criticism online.
Mount St. Mary’s University philosophy professor Josh Hochschild described Moyn’s framing as “liberalism at its purest.”
“All relations, even familial ones, are reducible to power struggles, inherently agonistic,” Hochschild wrote.
“Justice isn’t seeking a common good in trust with friends, it is balancing the inherently competing interests of enemies.”
Radio host Hugh Hewitt similarly argued that Moyn’s proposal clashes with the longstanding legal and cultural principle that parents hold primary responsibility for raising their children.
“The history of humanity—and the United States Constitution—is that parents are in charge of their children’s upbringings,” Hewitt wrote.
“Period. End of story.”
Hewitt noted that the Constitution could theoretically be amended to grant parents additional votes based on the number of children they have.
But assigning those votes to unrelated young adults, he argued, would represent something radically different.
“To assign those theoretical votes to other than parents or legal guardians is, to put it gently, wildly inconsistent with thousands of years of history and theology,” Hewitt wrote.
Critics Compare Idea to Totalitarian Attacks on Family
Other commentators framed Moyn’s proposal as part of a much older ideological hostility toward the traditional family.
An X account known as Cynical Publius argued that totalitarian political systems have historically attempted to weaken parental authority and replace it with state control.
“One of the tenets of most forms of totalitarianism, including Marxism and Naziism, is to destroy the family as the basic building block of society and replace it with the State,” the account wrote.
“Moyn is suggesting that parents should not have the right to speak for their children, and that third parties—presumably those chosen by a government led by evildoing ‘experts’ like Moyn—should speak on behalf of those children instead.
“This is not a new idea.
“Hitler embraced this idea.
“Stalin embraced this idea.
“Mao embraced this idea.”
Engineer Steven P. Smith made a similar argument.
“The Left has always viewed the family as the greatest threat to their lust for power,” Smith wrote.
“This is yet another in an endless list of attempts to undermine it.”
Other responses were even more cutting.
JD Flynn, editor of The Pillar, responded simply: “Check this guy’s hard drive.”
“That creep shouldn’t be anywhere near kids,” another user warned.
“You know who wants to keep parents and children separate? Predators.”
Proposal Comes Amid Debate Over America’s Aging Political Class
Moyn’s broader argument focuses on what he sees as excessive political and economic influence held by older Americans.
He has argued that younger generations face disadvantages in housing, employment, wealth accumulation, and political representation.
But his proposed “solution” of giving younger adults additional voting power, and potentially allowing them to politically represent children instead of parents, pushes the debate far beyond conventional generational reform.
Moyn serves as Yale University’s Chancellor Kent Professor of Law and History, specializing in modern European intellectual history and Jewish studies.
Douthat, meanwhile, is preparing to leave his columnist role at the New York Times to join CBS’s “60 Minutes.”
He previously served as a senior editor at The Atlantic and is also a film critic for National Review.
Whatever the merits of reforming a political system increasingly dominated by older Americans, Douthat drew a clear line at one proposed solution.
The idea that unrelated young adults understand children better than their own parents, he said, is simply “absurd.”
Blogger Comment:One of the main stated threats to the Globalists for their Global master plan is farming for food and where they wish to eliminate food and cause shortages in the West to control western civilization, for the creation of their One-World Government (OWG) take over of the world…that’s how evil these people really are and to use man-made famine to bring us to heel and make us comply with their malevolent intentions…man-made arson wild fires are one of the ways that they create this evil scenario in killing oiff food crops and bring famine…but strange that their controlled MSM hardly ever report arson and I wonder why?
.
Britain’s food supply is facing a growing new threat after a wave of suspected arson attacks targeted farms across the country while the UK endures what experts warn could become the worst harvest since records began.
Police have urged farmers to remain on high alert amid a series of suspicious fires destroying hay and straw stores, with investigators examining whether the attacks are being fueled by a viral challenge circulating on the Chinese Communist Party-linked social media platform TikTok.
The alarming attacks come as British farmers are already battling catastrophic crop losses following months of drought, scorching temperatures, and repeated heatwaves that have devastated cereal production.
Authorities fear the combination of deliberate arson and collapsing harvests could place even greater strain on the nation’s food security.
West Mercia Police warned farmers after a string of overnight fires targeting haystacks across northern England.
Investigators believe the attacks may be linked to an online challenge encouraging users to “set fire to as much stuff as possible” in rural areas.
Humberside Police are investigatingsix suspected arson attacks involving hay bales in North Lincolnshire, all reported during a single night on July 30.
The dry conditions have dramatically increased the danger, with fires capable of spreading rapidly across farmland.
In Oxfordshire, approximately 600 hay bales were destroyed after a massive blaze erupted in the village of Hinton Waldrist.
Police initially arrested one man before releasing him after determining he was not involved.
A manhunt remains underway for those responsible.
The attacks have even reportedly reached Jeremy Clarkson’s Diddly Squat Farm, where multiple hay bale silos were allegedly set ablaze earlier this year.
The suspected arson damaged grain storage facilities and other farm infrastructure during filming for Season 5 of Amazon Prime’s “Clarkson’s Farm.”
Worst Harvest Since Records Began
While farms battle suspected arsonists, Britain’s agricultural sector is also facing what researchers warn could become the worst harvest in modern history.
New analysis from the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit estimates the country could lose as much as 2.5 million metric tons of cereal and oilseed production compared to earlier forecasts.
Researchers estimate the losses will cost British arable farmers between approximately $410 million and $525 million in lost revenue.
Preliminary estimates show wheat yields have collapsed well below the 10-year average.
At an estimated 6.8 metric tons per hectare, wheat production is tracking toward one of the lowest levels ever recorded.
Researchers warned that if current yields hold, Britain’s total cereal and oilseed harvest will reach just 19.5 million metric tons—surpassing 2020 as the worst harvest since detailed records began in 1984.
Earlier forecasts had predicted average or above-average production.
Instead, one of the wettest winters on record was followed by an exceptionally dry spring before successive heatwaves scorched crops throughout May, June, and July.
Large parts of southern England also experienced their driest month since weather records began in 1836.
Farmers Sound the Alarm
Cambridgeshire farmer Martin Lines described this year’s harvest as “a real kick in the teeth.”
“After two terrible harvests in a row, the crops this year were looking good and full of potential coming out of spring, only for months of drought and heatwaves to destroy any prospect of a decent harvest,” Lines said.
“I’ve never known it this dry and hot on our farm.
“Even farmers I know who were skeptical of climate change are now saying they’re really worried about the future of their businesses and production; it’s just been completely brutal for our industry.”
Lines also warned that soaring production costs following the Iran conflict have made planning next year’s crops increasingly difficult.
Warnings Britain’s Food Security Is Under Pressure
The Country Land and Business Association warned Britain is now experiencing its third drought in just five years.
Association President Gavin Lane argued that extreme weather is becoming a permanent feature of British farming.
“If we want them to keep feeding the country, they need proper support,” Lane warned.
“Otherwise, this harvest could be their last.”
With farms now battling both collapsing crop yields and a disturbing rise in suspected arson attacks, growing concerns are emerging over the long-term resilience of Britain’s domestic food supply as pressure on the agricultural sector continues to mount.
Blogger Comment:Ai is one of the greatest threats to humanity and with a higher risk factot than a nuclear war, where the Globalists want this technolgy to be developed and use for themselves and their own ends…remember the experimental Covid-19 vaccines and what devistation that created for humanity, well just consider Covid equivalents coming back now creating continuous pandemics…as the main reason for Covid 19 was a lab release in Wuhan…that the Globalists ordered to be undertaken through Fauci to do their malevolent worst and where they have literally made $trilions out of the these sinister jabs and are still doing so today…as human death has no meaning to them at all…
.
Scientists have crossed a chilling new threshold after successfully using artificial intelligence (AI) to design and create entirely new, fully functional viruses that have never existed in nature.
Researchers from Stanford University and the Arc Institute used a generative AI system to create novel viral genomes from scratch before assembling them in a laboratory.
The result was 16 completely new viruses capable of infecting, replicating inside, and killing living bacterial cells.
Researchers insist the experimental viruses cannot infect humans.
However, biosecurity experts are sounding the alarm over what the breakthrough proves is now possible.
Machines can design functioning viruses.
And the safeguards needed to prevent the technology from being weaponized are not ready.
“The ability to compose viral genomes using generative AI now exists; the governance to safely steer it does not,” warned Dr. Thomas Inglesby and Dr. Moritz Hanke of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.
AI Generated 700,000 New Virus Designs
The bombshell research, now peer-reviewed and published in Science, used an AI model called Evo.
Rather than being trained on conventional human language, Evo was trained on billions of genetic sequences.
The system effectively processes DNA much like a large language model processes words, predicting which genetic building blocks should come next in a sequence.
Researchers focused on Phi X-174, a well-studied bacteriophage that infects E. coli.
They instructed Evo to generate new viruses using the genetic architecture it had learned.
The AI produced approximately 700,000 potential viral genomes.
Researchers narrowed those candidates to 300 and synthesized them in the laboratory.
Sixteen worked.
Those AI-designed viruses successfully infected bacteria, reproduced, and destroyed their hosts.
Synthetic biologist Patrick Cai of the University of Manchester described the achievement as “an important milestone.”
Scientists Have Crossed a Major Threshold
The medical possibilities are significant.
Bacteriophages can destroy bacteria, meaning AI-designed versions could potentially be developed to attack infections that have become resistant to antibiotics.
But the same breakthrough has an obvious darker side.
The technology has now demonstrated that generative AI can produce complete, viable viral genomes rather than merely analyze existing biological material.
In an accompanying Science commentary, Inglesby and Hanke warned that the question is no longer whether generative viral design will become possible.
It already is.
The issue now is whether humanity can control it before the same capability is directed toward pathogens capable of causing disease.
New disease-causing viruses “should not be pursued,” they warned.
Biosecurity Experts Sound the Alarm
Tom Ellis, professor of synthetic genome engineering at Imperial College London, noted that engineering complex human pathogens remains substantially harder than producing simple bacteriophages.
Ellis also argued that modifying existing pathogens would currently present a more realistic biological threat than designing an entirely new one through AI.
Nevertheless, experts warn that the direction of travel is unmistakable.
AI models are rapidly improving.
Genomic datasets are expanding.
Laboratory automation is becoming more sophisticated.
And the machines themselves can already generate viable biological organisms at a scale impossible for human researchers to match manually.
The experiment produced hundreds of thousands of candidate genomes in a single project.
Safeguard Depends on What AI Is Allowed to Learn
Researchers attempted to reduce the danger by restricting the biological information included in Evo’s training data.
But that safeguard is not inherent to the technology.
A different research group with access to broader datasets could train a similar model without the same restrictions.
That reality has alarmed biosecurity experts because controlling the information available to one model does nothing to eliminate the underlying capability.
Once researchers demonstrate that AI can generate functioning viral genomes, the knowledge itself cannot be erased.
AI Revolution Is Moving Into Biology
The development comes amid growing concerns about increasingly autonomous AI systems behaving in unexpected ways.
Major AI companies have recently revealed that advanced models were capable of exploiting cybersecurity vulnerabilities during controlled testing, including gaining access to external computer systems when safeguards failed.
Now the same accelerating technology has crossed into synthetic biology.
Instead of merely generating text, images, or computer code, AI can now write genetic code that becomes a functioning biological entity.
That represents an entirely different category of risk.
Population-Control Debate Adds Darker Context
The breakthrough also comes as scientists and policymakers continue pushing proposals to deliberately drive down global population levels in the name of environmental “sustainability.”
A recently published study called for gradually reducing humanity’s population to approximately four billion people by 2200.
That proposal was framed around voluntary reductions in fertility and consumption.
There is no evidence connecting those researchers to the new virus-design work.
Nevertheless, the collision of these two developments highlights the enormous stakes surrounding technologies capable of engineering biology.
A system powerful enough to create beneficial viruses is also a system whose misuse could have catastrophic consequences.
The danger becomes considerably more serious when biological engineering technology is combined with political ideologies that regard dramatic population reduction as desirable.
‘Governance to Safely Steer It Does Not’
The Stanford and Arc Institute researchers demonstrated something that until recently belonged largely to science fiction.
Artificial intelligence can design a virus.
Scientists can take that machine-generated genetic blueprint and construct it.
And the resulting organism can live, reproduce, infect its target, and kill it.
For now, those targets are bacteria.
But biosecurity experts are warning against assuming that boundary will remain permanent.
“The ability to compose viral genomes using generative AI now exists,” Inglesby and Hanke warned.
“The governance to safely steer it does not.”
Humanity has entered an era in which machines can write biological code capable of becoming life-like, self-replicating infectious agents.
The technology may ultimately produce powerful new medicines.
But the same breakthrough means the tools needed to design something far more dangerous are moving rapidly closer to reality.
And unlike the technology, the safeguards are already falling behind.
Blogger Comment:Just one of the deadly uses of Ai and where the people will some day wake up to the realisation of the deadly AI centres to humnaity are totally against them…and where the UK elites are one of their greatest driving forces of control over the people…
.
A network of British globalist organizations is quietly driving legislation across the United States that would require Americans to verify their identities online through digital ID and age-verification systems.
The coordinated campaign has already reached 21 states and Congress, according to an investigation by Effort, with many of the same groups that helped deliver the United Kingdom’s sweeping anti-free speechOnline Safety Act now working to replicate similar laws in America.
At the center of the effort is the UK-based 5Rights Foundation, whose leaders openly boast that U.S. legislation is modeled on Britain’s Age Appropriate Design Code (AADC).
“The Bill is practicable and realistic, drawing as it does on the UK’s Age Appropriate Design Code (AADC),” the organization declared alongside two authors of California’s Age Appropriate Design Code.
The investigation identifies five organizations involved in promoting digital identity and age-verification laws across the U.S.
Four are British organizations.
The fifth, Reset Tech, operates as an international coalition with a UK branch.
British Influence Campaign Targets U.S. States
The campaign extends far beyond offering policy advice.
One of the organizations pushing the legislation represents companies that profit directly from mandatory age-verification requirements.
The Age Verification Providers Association is a British trade association whose members sell age-verification and age-estimation technology.
The group backed Britain’s Online Safety Act and has argued that internet users accessing websites through virtual private networks (VPNs) should undergo additional age verification.
In effect, the very tool many people use to protect their online privacy would become justification for demanding even more identification.
The obvious question is whether lawmakers voting on these bills realize one of the chief advocates stands to financially benefit every time another verification mandate becomes law.
California Became the Blueprint
The 5Rights Foundation, chaired by Baroness Beeban Kidron, played a central role in California’s Age Appropriate Design Code, which became law in 2022.
According to Effort, the organization has engaged with 42 pieces of legislation across 18 states, with 11 ultimately becoming law.
Federal records show 5Rights is registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
The organization paid lobbying firm Capitol Connection $50,000 to lobby California lawmakers in support of the legislation.
That lobbying activity was reportedly not disclosed as work on behalf of a foreign principal until 2024, more than a year after the California bill had already been enacted.
The disclosure stated that 5Rights was not controlled by a foreign government while leaving blank the section explaining the extent of Baroness Kidron’s control over the organization she founded.
Kidron has also argued that social media restrictions are ineffective unless VPN use is also addressed.
“Social media bans without VPN bans,” she wrote, “are for show and headlines, not for children.”
The Same Organizations Appear Across Multiple Campaigns
Other organizations identified in the investigation have also played prominent roles in Britain’s online speech laws.
The Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) openly acknowledged helping shape the UK’s Online Safety Act.
Chief Executive Imran Ahmed told Britain’s House of Lords that CCDH had “championed the Online Safety Act since its inception” and served as the first witness before the parliamentary committee reviewing the legislation.
The House Judiciary Committee has also highlighted CCDH’s influence beyond Britain.
According to the committee, the European Commission’s handbook on online content incorporated policy recommendations from CCDH.
Another organization, the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), has received U.S. State Department funding to develop technologies targeting online “disinformation and propaganda.”
ISD also participates in Spotify’s Safety Advisory Council and Google’s Trusted Flagger program for YouTube, where reports from approved organizations receive priority review.
Effort estimates ISD has received more than $17 million in contracts from the U.S. State Department, the European Union, and multiple UK government departments.
Congress has since begun examining those relationships.
The House Judiciary Committee reported that it obtained documents from both Access Now and the Institute for Strategic Dialogue in July 2025 while investigating how European regulators work with outside organizations to police online speech.
Lobbying Campaign Expands Across America
Reset Tech has also emerged as a major player in the effort.
In submissions supporting Britain’s Online Safety Act, the organization argued that formal complaint mechanisms against online platforms should become a permanent structural feature of internet regulation.
Its American affiliate, Reset Tech Action, spent more than $1.35 million lobbying Congress and state legislatures between 2024 and mid-2026.
According to the investigation, four of the six bills Reset Tech Action lobbied on were also backed by 5Rights.
Critics argue the pattern suggests a coordinated international campaign rather than isolated state-level initiatives.
Digital ID Push Raises New Questions
The House Judiciary Committee has previously warned that Britain’s Online Safety Act represents one of the most significant foreign attempts to expand government oversight of online speech.
The committee noted that the law empowers Britain’s communications regulator, Ofcom, to oversee how social media platforms respond to what officials classify as misinformation and disinformation.
Now, similar legislative proposals are advancing across America.
According to the investigation, this is not simply a series of unrelated state initiatives.
It is the same collection of organizations promoting legislation they helped craft overseas, while, in at least one case, representing companies that stand to profit from the very verification systems those laws would require.
World Freedom 