World Freedom

Canada is facing a new wave of public outrage after federal agents slaughtered hundreds of healthy ostriches at a British Columbia (BC) farm last week, an operation supporters describe as “inhumane,” “unnecessary,” and a chilling example of a government that increasingly defaults to force over science.

The late-night raid unfolded at Universal Ostrich Farms in Edgewood, where Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) personnel, aided by Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), opened fire on the birds for hours.

At least two shooters, believed to be CFIA “marksmen” from the agency’s Enforcement Investigation and Services Unit, pumped hundreds of rounds into the flock.

The farm’s owners and supporters watched helplessly as the birds were gunned down by the federal government.

Witnesses say many ostriches were left injured and crying out through the night until CFIA inspectors returned at dawn to decapitate those still alive.

Supporters described scenes of chaos and cruelty.

One person recounted online:

“They were gunned down in the dark, over hours… the gunshots, the agonizing sounds of the birds, the screaming… it was absolutely f**** sickening.”

No Protective Gear Despite CFIA Claiming ‘Pathogenic Risk’

Despite insisting the birds posed a highly pathogenic avian flu danger, the shooters wore no protective equipment beyond balaclavas.

RCMP officers later sifted through blood-soaked debris with bare hands to load carcasses into bins sent to an undisclosed disposal site.

Supporters tracked vehicles amid fears the birds were being moved toward the Surrey port for ocean dumping.

CFIA Refused to Test the Birds

The Canadian government had provided no evidence that the birds posed a bird flu risk.

Universal Ostrich Farms had pleaded for testing for months, saying the flock appeared healthy and had developed antibodies, natural immunity that could provide valuable insight into H5N1 containment.

However, the CFIA refused.

Instead, the agency pushed ahead with “depopulation,” asserting it was following its stamping-out policy under the Health of Animals Act.

The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the farm’s final appeal Thursday.

Farm Owners: ‘Our Hearts Are Empty’

Farm spokeswoman Katie Pasitney, who kneeled in the rain begging agents to stop, described the emotional devastation:

“Our hearts are empty… It doesn’t matter if it’s a chicken or a 35-year-old ostrich; no animal should have to die inhumanely, neglected, tortured.”

The CFIA maintains that shooting hundreds of birds over several hours was “the most appropriate and humane option.”

Yet the agency’s own manuals say shooting should be used only as a “last resort.”

Growing Anger Over Government Overreach

The raid is resonating far beyond British Columbia.

Many Canadians, already wary of federal power after years of aggressive pandemic policies and world-leading euthanasia expansion, now see the ostrich cull as another example of heavy-handed government behavior masquerading as “public health.”

In recent years, Canada has drawn international scrutiny for its rapidly expanding Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) regime, which now permits euthanasia for non-terminal conditions and is slated for another major expansion in 2027.

Critics say Ottawa’s instinct to eliminate problems “at the root,” whether vulnerable people or entire animal populations, reflects a broader shift toward bureaucratic convenience over compassion.

U.S. Figures Call for Investigation

The slaughter also caught the attention of major American figures.

American billionaire John Catsimatidis, a supporter of the farm and outspoken animal advocate, demanded a “thorough investigation,” even urging the U.S. Department of Justice to intervene if Canada refuses.

The farm’s story reached Catsimatidis in May when Pasitney called into his radio program pleading for help:

“The Canadian government wants our farm killed off of two tests… even though they are fully healthy and doing amazingly well.”

President Donald Trump’s administration officials, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., also became involved.

Kennedy pushed for a collaborative immunity study, writing:

“There is significant value in studying this population,” instead of the “indiscriminate” culling.

Dr. Oz even offered to relocate the entire flock to his Florida property, but the farm refused, wanting to keep the operation Canadian.

Ottawa Refused All Alternatives

Despite international proposals, scientific interest, and months of pressure, the CFIA pushed ahead.

By July, Kennedy, Oz, and Catsimatidis appealed directly to liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney for a joint public statement.

Carney never responded.

Justice Minister Sean Fraser instead praised the Supreme Court decision, saying he was “pleased to see” the case dismissed and insisting that the CFIA must “protect the health of the general Canadian public.”

Local Leaders Condemn the Raid

BC Conservative MP Scott Anderson blasted the operation as reckless:

“This operation has cost Canadians millions of dollars… and has turned the once peaceful town of Edgewood into something that looks like a science fiction movie set featuring Area 51.”

‘The People Have to Fight Back’

Pasitney says the fight is far from over:

“There has to be change in Canada.

“This cannot be allowed to continue to happen.

“The people have to fight back.”

With hundreds of carcasses removed, a devastated farm community, and national distrust rising once again, the ostrich massacre is quickly becoming another flashpoint in Canada’s ongoing struggle over transparency, accountability, and the expanding power of federal agencies operating under the banner of “public health.”

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-government-slaughters-hundreds-ostriches-bc-farm-despite-no-evidence-bird-flu/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Government Quietly Advances Plan for National Digital ID

Blogger Comment: Now around 65,000 Canadians have been “euthanized” since 2016 when the Canadian government legalised the system to provide early deaths to eliviate suffering and only a mere 9 years ago when there were zero people euthanized legally in Canada…and where these deaths now accounts as the 3rd highest statistics of Canadian deaths…an enormous number and increasing significantly by the year…but what is the reason for this huge number in a relatively small populated country of 41 million including children, as there cannot be really so many terminally ill people in Canada can there and where that specifically is why the law was brought into being in the first place…nothing else and therefore what has so sadly gone wrong with the legislation…put in place only to help people who had no hope and was to ease their suffering, but where now, many more have been included who are not terminally ill…for the rapidly expanding Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) regime, now permits euthanasia for non-terminal conditions and is slated for another major expansion in 2027?

Newly released government data has revealed a disturbing rise in euthanasia deaths across Canada, with the province of Quebec now recording the highest “assisted suicide” rate in the world.

According to the 2024–2025 Report of the Commission on End-of-Life Care, deaths under the Canadian government’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program accounted for 7.4% of all deaths in Quebec.

The figure marks an alarming 9% increase in just one year.

“The Commission notes that MAiD is in increasing demand and occupies an important place in the public sphere in Quebec,” the report states.

“The Commission rigorously and vigilantly fulfills its mandate to ensure that MAiD requirements are properly applied in Quebec and that MAiD is not chosen as a treatment option when other curative, palliative, or end-of-life care options are unavailable,” it continues.

Despite that assurance, the commission’s findings expose troubling trends.

Half of all of the individuals euthanized had said they felt like a burden to family, friends, or caregivers, while 24% cited loneliness or isolation as reasons for ending their lives.

Even more alarming, the report found that 4% of euthanasia deaths were fulfilled the same day or the next day, leaving little time for medical review or counseling.

The data reveals that the percentage of “assisted suicide” deaths involving a terminal illness is shrinking, while the number of people euthanized for poverty, depression, loneliness, or other non-permanent issues is skyrocketing.

A growing number of people are reporting that they are being pressured or “bullied” into “choosing” euthanasia over more expensive treatments.

As Slay News has previously reported, the Canadian government’s socialized healthcare system is now saving tens of millions of dollars a year by euthanizing patients instead of treating them, creating new incentives under a chilling culture of death.

Lack of Oversight and Transparency

The commission admitted that Quebec has no standardized tools or metrics to evaluate whether palliative care options are being adequately provided.

“There are no management indicators or standardized tools for assessing the quality of palliative and end-of-life care services, how well they meet the needs of patients and families, or how efficiently the system operates,” the report states.

“The Commission therefore cannot determine whether the needs of people who could benefit from such care are being met.”

Despite acknowledging these gaps, the commission stopped short of recommending any halt to euthanasia procedures, stating only:

“We cannot continue to navigate blindly on such a critical issue.”

Quebec Leads the World in Euthanasia Deaths

According to Dr. David Lussier, a geriatrician at the Montreal University Institute of Geriatrics, Quebec now has the highest number of assisted suicide requests globally.

The province has now surpassed both the Netherlands and Belgium, which have long been viewed as world leaders in euthanasia.

Quebec is also pushing to expand access even further.

The province announced plans in 2024 to begin accepting advance requests for euthanasia, allowing individuals to pre-authorize their own deaths, even though such provisions remain illegal under federal law.

One of the province’s newest palliative care centers has also drawn controversy for promoting assisted suicide to terminal and disabled patients, branding it a compassionate “choice.”

National Expansion Under Trudeau’s Liberal Government

The euthanasia surge extends far beyond Quebec.

Since former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Party government legalized assisted suicide in 2016, the number of Canadians killed by lethal injection has skyrocketed.

In 2021, Parliament expanded eligibility to include those who were not terminally ill but living with chronic conditions.

A later proposal to extend euthanasia to those suffering solely from mental illness faced intense opposition from medical, religious, and mental health groups, prompting the government to delay the measure until 2027.

To date, an estimated 65,000 Canadians have died by euthanasia since legalization, including roughly 16,000 deaths in 2023 alone, according to official figures.

Advocates warn the real total may be even higher, given growing concerns over incomplete reporting and opaque data collection.

A Nation on a Dangerous Path

Once justified as an option for the terminally ill, Canada’s euthanasia program has rapidly evolved into one of the most permissive in the world, allowing lethal injections for those suffering from loneliness, poverty, or psychological distress.

As Quebec’s numbers climb and oversight remains lacking, critics argue that what began as a “compassionate choice” has become a system of quiet elimination, targeting society’s most vulnerable under the guise of mercy.

With calls mounting for reform, many are raising concerns about how far Canada will go before the world says it has gone too far.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/canada-euthanasia-deaths-surge-record-highs-data-shows/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Man Devastated After Government Euthanizes Both Grandmothers

Blogger Comment: The European Union’s Digital Control System is nearly with us and those not in the ‘real’ know-world, think that it is for their convenience still, not realising the enormous control it will have on ‘their own money’ once fully implemented and where the EU will control all their “own” money, what you can spend it on and even stop you accessing it completely, just what has happened in Vietnam…step out of line in the EU’s control mindset and thinking will stop you buying food, buying anything really and where they could do NOTHING about it…do these people really want to live in Orwell’s world of 1984, as it is happenimg now in nations around the world where control is everything, as it is power over the people…and once it is in, there is no turning back as our political western leaders except in ‘four’ nations are now (USA, Hungary, Slovakia and Italy) controlled totally by the Davos Globalists through blackmail and financial power, and why all this is being done for their 2030 control of the western world…sounds like madness read up on the WEF on Rumble, where they have been stating this now for over 3-decades and where it appears to be nearing fruition for these elites who wish to be in the old way, masters of the universe…they are clearly mad, but with their puppet political leaders now in place, they appear to be getting there rapidly by the year as they close in on 2030…fast

Europe has taken a major step toward ending financial privacy as the globalist European Union (EU) will officially criminalize large cash payments.

Beginning January 2027, any cash transaction above €10,000 will be outlawed in the EU, making large cash purchases illegal across all 27 member states.

The move is part of the EU’s sweeping new Anti-Money Laundering (AML) package.

Unelected EU officials insist that AML targets criminals but, in practice, places ordinary citizens under full financial surveillance.

Crackdown on Cash & Bitcoin

Under the new rules:

  • Any cash payment over €10,000 becomes a criminal offense.

  • Any crypto transaction above €1,000 without approved identity verification is subject to prosecution.

Meanwhile, anonymous digital wallets, used for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, are banned entirely.

The new laws mandate that every crypto transfer must be linked to a verified digital ID.

Officials claim it’s about “security.”

Critics say it’s about control.

Digital Euro Looms: Programmable, Trackable, and Tied to Identity

The new laws are in preparation for the looming central bank digital currency (CBDC) that is due to soon launch across all EU nations.

The European Central Bank (ECB) has confirmed plans to roll out the Digital Euro by 2029.

The Digital Euro is a fully programmable currency that gives regulators unprecedented power:

  • Limits on how much you can hold

  • Restrictions on what you can buy

  • Expiration dates for digital cash

  • Real-time spending surveillance

Combine that with the EU’s increasingly centralized digital identification systems, and you get a financial architecture where a single bureaucratic decision can freeze accounts, block purchases, or silence dissent.

Global Trend

Europe’s crackdown doesn’t exist in a vacuum.

As Slay News has previously reported, governments around the world are quietly constructing the same system:

Canada is advancing a federal digital ID program under the guise of “modernizing service delivery.”

The United Kingdom, under socialist Prime Minister Keir Starmer, is reviving national digital ID plans once thought politically toxic.

In addition, Australia’s 2024 Digital ID Bill establishes a unified, government-verified identity system, which is currently being rolled out for public use.

The EU’s Digital Identity Wallet, rolling out in phases, aims to link banking access, medical data, travel permits, and online authentication under one government-issued credential.

Each digital ID initiative claims to be “voluntary.”

Yet, each one slowly becomes required to access essential services, travel, vote, or manage finances.

Once a digital ID becomes a prerequisite for banking, linking it to programmable digital cash becomes automatic.

The Blueprint: Control First, “Safety” Later

Once cash is restricted and digital IDs become mandatory, a programmable currency lets governments:

  • Disable transactions in certain industries

  • Set carbon-tracking limits and block “high-emissions” purchases

  • Shut down accounts of political dissidents

  • Impose automatic fines

  • Track every purchase in real time

  • Declare certain transactions illegal without passing new laws

A system like that doesn’t just monitor spending, it manages it.

If the model works in Europe, the rollout expands globally.

Europe Is Only the Beginning

Regulators don’t hide their intentions.

Banking lobbies across the West have repeatedly warned that cash is “inefficient,” that anonymous transactions “pose risk,” and that centralized digital currency is “inevitable.”

The EU law effectively marks the beginning of the end for private transactions.

Starting in 2027, the government will decide what “legal spending” looks like.

By 2029, the government will decide how you spend, where you spend, and if you’re allowed to spend at all.

Critics warn the real threat isn’t money laundering, it’s the quiet construction of an economic system where financial permission replaces financial freedom.

Europe is the pilot program.

The world is next.

Follow the link fir the source… https://slaynews.com/news/europe-criminalizes-large-cash-payments-ahead-digital-euro-launch/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Government Quietly Advances Plan for National Digital ID

Blogger Comment: They don’t do this is in any other western nation to safeguard their people, but they should do as these Globalist controlled corporations will do anything to camouflaging their products to make billions with the manipulation of words that most people don’t know the proper meaning of…and the possible human health risks in eating something that they were not really made aware off…they know what they are doing and it is a blessing that we have a country such as the USA understanding and protecting their people against harm.., and a pity others do not think that way like the EU and UK et al…period

A federal appeals court has ruled that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) improperly allowed certain genetically modified foods to avoid congressionally mandated labeling requirements.

The ruling overturned a key portion of the federal agency’s rules.

U.S. Circuit Judge Daniel Collins wrote that the USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) “committed legal error in concluding that, under ‘the plain language of the amended Act,’ ‘if a food does not contain detectable modified genetic material, it is not a bioengineered food.’”

In his decision, Collins said AMS “relied entirely on the flawed legal premise that the non-detectability of a substance under the regulation was equivalent to its nonpresence.”

Congress passed a 2016 law requiring the agriculture secretary to establish national labeling standards for bioengineered (genetically modified) ingredients.

AMS completed the rulemaking in 2018, and mandatory compliance began on January 1, 2022.

The rules required companies to label foods containing genetically modified ingredients as “bioengineered.”

However, AMS created exceptions for products in which genetic modifications were rendered undetectable during processing.

Citizens for GMO Labeling and several advocacy groups sued.

They are arguing that all foods containing genetically modified ingredients should be labeled, whether they’re detectable or not.

A federal district judge sided with the USDA in 2022, but the Ninth Circuit reversed that part of the ruling.

The three-judge panel found that AMS’s broad exemptions were not supported by the statute and sent that portion of the rule back to the agency for reconsideration.

The ruling noted that AMS may still craft some exclusions consistent with congressional instructions.

The USDA has not issued a comment on the litigation.

George Kimbrell, legal director for the Center for Food Safety, which represented the challengers, called the ruling “a landmark victory for the public’s right to know what they eat and feed their families.”

“We are gratified that the Court has struck down USDA’s loophole for ultra-processed GMO foods, the vast majority of which have been genetically engineered for increased pesticide tolerance,” he said.

The group noted that products such as soda and cooking oil were among those exempted under the existing rules.

The appeals court upheld AMS’s use of the term “bioengineered,” rejecting efforts by the challengers to require more commonly used terms such as “genetically modified.”

The panel also agreed that AMS improperly allowed companies to rely on digital codes, rather than on-package text, to disclose bioengineered ingredients.

It ruled that the district court should have vacated that portion of the rule and sent the matter back with instructions to do so after hearing further arguments from the parties.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/appeals-court-orders-usda-update-genetically-modified-food-labeling/

And,

READ MORE – SNAP Beneficiaries Threaten to Loot Stores Over Democrat Shutdown: ‘It Is the Taxpayer’s Job to Pay for My Kids to Eat’

Blogger Comment:  This is what happens, when they bring in new laws and then clamp down us in every sphere then eventually so that you are watched 24/7/365 and are never really free and if the governments consider that you have crossed the line with ‘free-speech’ et al. you can be stopped from buying things eventually and especially with second stage CBDC coming in to merge with this draconian brother 1^st stage control system…so where if the people allow it in other nations, it will be become literally hell on earth and what the Nazis did prior to WW2 and before the German people really knew what was actually going on….but by then of course it was too late and our WEF controlled political puppet and captured leaders know this well in the West…the people cannot see this great as one of humanity’s greatest threats ever at all and the cesspit that they are going to fall into through the subtle and controlling Digital ID from our WEF ‘aligned’ western political leaders in the EU, UK and all western aligned nations…

.

The Australian government has started rolling out a new test for its integrated digital ID framework as the country pushes to expand its national identity systems.

Governments worldwide continue tightening their grip on citizens through expanding digital identity systems.

Australia has just taken another major step toward a nationwide, integrated digital ID framework.

The federal government has launched a new digital ID trial in the rental sector at the same time officials prepare to impose national online age-verification requirements by the end of the year.

Both programs rely on identity authentication, raising concerns that the systems could eventually merge into a single, far-reaching digital identity network.

Digital ID Moves Into Housing

Under the new trial, tenants can verify their identity and financial information online rather than repeatedly submitting hard copies of passports, driver’s licenses, bank statements, and other sensitive documents to real estate agents.

Finance Minister Katy Gallagher and Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil announced the program as a way to “streamline” rental applications while claiming it will reduce privacy and security risks tied to traditional document sharing.

The project is being run jointly by the Department of Finance and the Treasury.

It integrates the government’s Digital ID system with the Consumer Data Right (CDR) framework, creating a unified verification process for renters.

PropertyMe, one of the country’s largest property management software providers, is overseeing the pilot alongside ConnectID and payments firm Cuscal.

Their goal is to normalize digital ID verification across the entire rental process.

“Right now, renters are asked to upload anything from driver’s licenses and passports to bank statements and payslips, often to several platforms,” said Scott Shepherd, PropertyMe’s Chief Product Officer.

“Products and services now exist that enable us to reimagine that.

“Renters should be able to prove who they are and their ability to pay rent, without handing over additional information.”

REA Group senior economist Eleanor Creagh said the pilot “may help cut red tape for renters while strengthening data security and transparency.”

The pilot comes just months before Australia is expected to introduce mandatory online age-verification laws, a move that will require all citizens to prove their identity to access certain websites and digital services.

Combined with the new rental initiative, critics warn that Australia is building the foundation for a centralized digital identity system capable of authenticating and tracking users across multiple areas of life, from renting a home to banking to accessing content online.

The more interconnected these systems become, the easier it is for governments and corporations to monitor individuals, control access to services, and collect data across sectors.

Part of a Global Push

Australia is far from alone.

The UK, Canada, the European Union, and Singapore have all accelerated digital ID deployments, marketing them as tools for convenience, safety, and “modernization.”

But each step toward integration also expands the scope of what governments and private companies can see and control.

A Broader System on the Horizon

If Australia’s rental digital ID trial proves successful, officials may begin using similar verification systems in other sectors, creating a digital identity infrastructure that spans much of daily life.

As governments worldwide push centralized identification systems deeper into public and private services, concerns over surveillance, data misuse, and personal autonomy continue to grow.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/australia-begins-expanding-digital-id-system/

And,

READ MORE – Visa Launches Biometric Digital ID-Linked Payment System

Blogger Comment: The START of the total shut down and CONTROL of ‘Free-SPEECH’ in the United Kingdom and with the Digital ID Laws coming in if the British people allow this draconian Act of Law to be introduced, they can say goodbye to their freedoms forever, as this is the first main stage in controlling the people of the United Kingdom and what the Davos Globalist elites have ordered their western political puppet leaders [(except for only four western nations that are not captured by the Davos Globalists, the USA under Trump (and where Biden would have certainly capitulated and have done it, as he was a top WEF political controlled puppet whilst in Office and before even with Obama as well, and a clear pointer to this fact is what he did with the ‘open’ southern border whilst in power where over 20 million Illegals flooded the USA in a mere 4 years, where many were sadistic criminals, rapists, evil child paedophiles and murderers et al it has now officially been determined and confirmed), together with Slovakia, Hungary and Italy)] to do this so that they can bring in their One World Government (OWG) in the West by 2030 (for without this major 1st step and with the CBDC that comes after…the two evil brothers…the Globalist WEF could not take over the West) and where all dissent will be 100% suppressed by our military and police., as it will be Law and the judiciary will allow it to take place, as they too have been specially chisenb over the decades to do their masters bidding, as the law is not what it was before…totally independent and has been compromised…sounds familiar, well it is and a carbon copy in modern terms of what the NAZIS did to the German people to control them prior to WW2 that killed millions and set the world on fire…

The socialist UK government’s war on free expression has just reached a new low after celebrated British soccer star Joey Barton was found guilty on six criminal counts for posting “offensive” messages on social media.

The conviction of the renowned former UK soccer player and team manager is a chilling reminder of how far the country has fallen into speech policing.

On Friday, a Liverpool Crown Court jury declared the 43-year-old had “crossed the line between free speech and a crime” by expressing wrongtink online.

The court ruled that Barton had turned everyday online insults into prosecutable offenses in a country that once claimed to value liberty.

One of Barton’s supposed crimes was calling TV host Jeremy Vine a “bike nonce” in posts on 𝕏.

The soccer star made the remark after Vine suggested Barton had a “brain injury.”

No charges were filed against Vine, however.

Barton responded bluntly, asking:

“Have you been on Epstein Island?

“Are you going to be on these flight logs?

“Might as well own up now because I’d phone the police if I saw you near a primary school on ya bike.”

Another post the UK government deemed to be a speech crime read:

“Oh @theJeremyVine Did you Rolf-aroo and Schofield go out on a tandem bike ride?

“You big bike nonce ya.”

The comment appeared to be a reference to Rolf Harris, a former children’s TV host who was convicted of child sex crimes.

Barton was also prosecuted for a post warning:

“If you see this fella by a primary school call 999.

“Beware Man with Camera on his helmets cruising past primary schools.

“Call the Cops if spotted.”

Authorities went further, charging Barton with speech crimes for comparing sports commentators Lucy Ward and Eni Aluko to serial killers Fred and Rose West.

Barton wrote they were the “Fred and Rose West of football commentary.”

In court, Barton said he “would probably not do it again if he had his time again.”

He argued that Ward and Aluko are “strong enough” to handle the joke.

But that wasn’t enough for prosecutors intent on making an example of him.

They claimed Barton “targeted and bullied them” and “crossed the line between exercising a democratic right to freedom of expression and a crime” by “sending messages of an extreme, degrading and dehumanizing character.”

According to prosecutors:

“It was not some robust exchange of firmly held views or, as he would like you to believe, an attempt to generate an online debate.

“It was undiluted bullying.

“It was a campaign of such bullying by the deployment of grossly offensive messages — with the intention of sending them to cause distress, anxiety or humiliation.”

The judge even became visibly irritated when Barton wore a Union Jack scarf in court, a striking symbol of the nation now criminalizing speech while bristling at its own flag.

Judge Andrew Menary KC complained:

“He has chosen to adorn himself with a particular flag, which I suppose is a stunt to make a point.

“He will not be permitted to do that on the sentencing date.”

Barton is out on bail but will be sentenced on December 8.

It’s an incredible fall from grace for the failing nation, once the most powerful in the world, where posting edgy jokes online now carries the threat of prison.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/uk-soccer-star-found-guilty-speech-crimes-grossly-offensive-social-media-posts/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-newsletter

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Man Devastated After Government Euthanizes Both Grandmothers

Russia is taking another major step toward a fully state-controlled Internet, with lawmakers advancing a proposal that would make the country’s biometric and digital ID systems mandatory for all online age verification.

If approved, the plan would effectively eliminate online anonymity in Russia.

It will force citizens to verify their identity through government-run systems every time they access “adult” or “potentially harmful” content.

The proposal, discussed on October 28, is being promoted as a child protection initiative.

However, critics warn it’s the latest front in Moscow’s long campaign to bring the internet under total state supervision.

Officials claim the measure is meant to block minors from viewing pornography, violent media, and what they call “propaganda of antisocial behavior.”

But the definition of restricted content is so broad that it could easily encompass political speech, satire, or dissent.

Government-Controlled Verification Network

At the core of the plan is Gosuslugi, the Kremlin’s main digital services portal, already the hub for state identification and citizen tracking.

The system connects directly to Russia’s Unified System of Identification and Authentication (ESIA) and the Unified Biometrics System (UBS).

Both are controlled by the federal government.

State Duma deputy Anton Nemkin, a former FSB officer, said the networks “could be used to verify age without directly transmitting passport data to third-party platforms.”

In practice, that means the state becomes the mandatory middleman between every Russian citizen and the Internet by granting or denying access based on biometric verification.

Digital ‘Sovereignty’ or Total Surveillance?

Digital rights experts say the policy continues a decade-long erosion of online privacy in Russia.

Since 2012, Moscow has justified one new layer of censorship after another under the banner of “protecting children.”

Each expansion has given the state deeper insight into citizens’ private digital activity.

The new proposal aligns with Russia’s drive for “digital sovereignty,” a strategy to isolate and control the country’s Internet ecosystem while cutting off foreign platforms and anonymizing tools.

Andrei Svintsov, Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Information Policy, recently declared that online anonymity in Russia will disappear entirely within “three years, five at most.”

This new system would accelerate that goal by ensuring every citizen’s online behavior is directly tied to a verified digital identity stored in state databases.

A Centralized Record of Private Behavior

If implemented, Russians would be forced to log in through ESIA whenever they view content labeled as adult, even if that label is applied vaguely or politically.

The result would be a permanent, state-controlled record linking personal identities to private browsing and consumption habits, handing authorities unprecedented surveillance power.

Meanwhile, governments in other countries have tested various age-verification technologies.

However, Russia’s model stands apart for its total dependence on centralized biometric databases and direct government oversight.

Analysts say it’s not just about shielding minors; it’s about normalizing constant identity checks, building a digital framework where the Kremlin can monitor, restrict, or punish online behavior at will.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/russia-moves-mandate-biometric-digital-id-end-online-anonymity/

And,

READ MORE – Visa Launches Biometric Digital ID-Linked Payment System

Three additional Chinese researchers at the University of Michigan have been charged as part of a widening federal investigation into the smuggling of undeclared biohazardous material from China into the United States.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has just announced the arrest of the three scientists who were caught entering the country with undeclared biological material.

Federal prosecutors announced that Bai Xu, Zhang Fengfan, and Zhang Zhiyong were charged in a criminal complaint in the Eastern District of Michigan.

Bai and Zhang Fengfan face conspiracy charges for allegedly smuggling biological materials, while Zhang Zhiyong is accused of making false statements to federal agents.

The three researchers were arrested at New York City’s John F. Kennedy International Airport on October 16.

They were apprehended as they attempted to board a flight to flee to Communist China.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents detained them before departure.

Linked to Earlier Case

The charges are tied to the earlier arrest of Han Chengxuan, a scholar from China’s Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

Han arrived in the United States in June under a J-1 visa and was detained immediately after customs officials discovered she had previously shipped petri dishes containing C. elegans under false declarations.

C. elegans is a regulated biological organism.

Han later pleaded no contest to three smuggling counts and lying to U.S. officials.

She was sentenced to time served and removed from the country on September 11.

Shipments Flagged 

According to the criminal complaint, customs authorities intercepted multiple packages associated with Han and the three charged researchers.

Several shipments were falsely labeled as “plastic plates” or “doc” in an effort to hide their true contents.

However, investigators discovered:

• genetically modified C. elegans in petri dishes
• 28 plasmids—circular DNA molecules used in genetic engineering
• additional live biological samples

All of these qualify under U.S. regulations as biohazardous materials requiring proper declaration, permits, and handling protocols.

Federal officials say Bai refused to cooperate when questioned about an intercepted package last March.

Additional packages sent to “Dylan Zhang,” a false name believed to be Zhang Fengfan, contained more undeclared biological samples, including genetically modified organisms.

Zhang Zhiyong reportedly sent a mislabeled package containing nematodes to the University of Michigan as far back as 2019.

Non-Compliance and University Termination

After Han’s removal from the United States, the University of Michigan began an internal review.

Prosecutors say all three researchers “refused to participate” and were subsequently terminated.

Their J-1 visa records were canceled on October 8, making them ineligible to remain in the country.

Customs interviews conducted at JFK Airport on October 16 revealed that all three identified Han as a member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Prosecutors also noted Han’s academic connections to senior figures at Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

Broader Concerns About Biosecurity

The case comes amid heightened scrutiny of foreign nationals working in U.S. laboratories.

In recent months, multiple smuggling-related prosecutions have originated from the University of Michigan, including a case involving a researcher accused of attempting to import Fusarium graminearum, a fungus capable of destroying major grain crops.

Republican Rep. John Moolenaar (R-MI), who chairs the House Select Committee on the CCP, said the latest charges reflect “an organized network of scholars engaged in illegal activity” tied to broader efforts by the Chinese government to obtain American research and technology.

“These new charges reveal an organized network of scholars engaged in illegal activity on Michigan’s campus,” Moolenaar warned..

“It is part of a broader, coordinated campaign targeting universities across the country, driven by China’s efforts to acquire American technology.”

In a statement this week, Attorney General Pam Bondi said:

“Attempting to smuggle biological materials under the guise of ‘research’ is a serious crime that threatens America’s national and agricultural security.

“We will remain vigilant to threats like these from foreign nationals who would take advantage of America’s generosity to advance a malicious agenda.”

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/chinese-scientists-caught-smuggling-biohazardous-material-america/

And,

READ MORE – Russia Moves to Mandate Biometric Digital ID to End Online Anonymity

Blogger Comment: This is another warning to the people in the UK that control is coming like never before and before the UK government expidites their Globalist masters wishes before 2030, as the UK (and every EU nation except three, Slovakia, Hungary and Italy) is clearly now a captured state of the elite Davos WEF doing all of their bidding and Starmer is just one of the Gloabalist’s puppet political leaders (and where now most of the EU’s po;itical leaders are enthrowned by the Davos elites over the last 30 years and all preplanned of course…

The UK government’s communications regulator Ofcom is facing backlash and a federal lawsuit after asserting that the U.S. Constitution does not protect American citizens from its online censorship laws.

Under the United Kingdom’s sweeping Online Safety Act, Ofcom has been sending enforcement letters to small U.S. platforms, including 4chan and Kiwi Farms.

Ofcom is demanding compliance with British speech regulations and threatening heavy fines for noncompliance.

But the move has triggered what one U.S. attorney calls a “constitutional ambush.”

Preston Byrne, an attorney representing 4chan, Kiwi Farms, and two other American companies, said the regulator’s actions were “frankly asinine.”

“My clients are entirely American,” Byrne said.

“All of their operations are American.

“All of their infrastructure is American, and they have no connection to the UK whatsoever.”

Despite that, Ofcom reportedly threatened the companies with “a £20,000 fine plus £100 daily penalties for 60 days thereafter.”

Byrne responded by filing a federal lawsuit in Washington, D.C., challenging Ofcom’s jurisdiction and accusing it of attempting to export censorship into the United States.

“We Don’t Care What the UK Thinks”

Byrne said the lawsuit was designed to make three points:

• To demonstrate that U.S. companies are prepared to fight back against foreign censorship regimes.
• To assert his clients’ rights in front of a U.S. federal judge.
• To provoke Ofcom into “doing something stupid,” which he said it promptly did.

After the filing, Byrne said Ofcom sent “a 40-page letter of tremendous length, which is deeply unserious.”

According to Byrne, Ofcom’s response included an explicit admission that it does not “think U.S. law applies on U.S. soil” and intends to rely on sovereign immunity.

It’s a position Byrne called self-defeating.

“This rather undermines the British government’s assertions that it’s made time and again, including to the President, to his face, that the British government is not using its sovereign power to censor American citizens,” Byrne said.

In an official notice sent to 4chan, Ofcom made its position clear:

“We also note 4chan’s claim that it is protected from enforcement action taken by Ofcom because of the First Amendment to the US Constitution.

“However, the First Amendment binds only the US government and not overseas bodies, such as Ofcom, and therefore, it does not affect Ofcom’s powers to enforce the Act in this case.”

A Legal Contradiction in Writing

That statement, intended to justify Ofcom’s enforcement, may have undercut its entire legal case.

By asserting that the First Amendment “binds only the U.S. government,” Ofcom admits it stands entirely outside the U.S. constitutional order, yet it simultaneously claims the right to enforce British speech law against U.S.-based companies operating solely on American soil.

If Ofcom claims the U.S. Constitution doesn’t apply to its actions, legal experts say, then neither does the UK’s Online Safety Act, which has no authority beyond Britain’s borders.

Ofcom’s position effectively amounts to asserting foreign jurisdiction inside the United States, something American courts are unlikely to recognize.

“Ultimately, from a global free speech resistance standpoint, and this is something that I think Ofcom really doesn’t understand,” Byrne said.

“We don’t care what the UK thinks in the United States…

“And our objective is really to demonstrate the toothlessness of these global regimes in the United States, where most of the Internet is based.”

U.S. Lawmakers Join the Fight

Byrne said his team has reached out to the White House, both houses of Congress, and several lawmakers are now exploring legislation to block foreign censorship enforcement on U.S. soil.

“I’m advised that there are a number of senators in Congress and representatives in Congress who are looking at introducing a bill to put a stop to this,” he said.

Byrne added that he is also backing a New Hampshire state law that would create a $1 million penalty per occurrence against any foreign regulator that tries to enforce censorship inside the United States, along with a waiver of sovereign immunity in state courts.

Ofcom Defends Skipping Legal Channels

Ofcom, for its part, insists it does not need to use the U.S.–UK Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT).

MLAT is the formal process governments use to request evidence or cooperation across borders.

“There is no requirement in the Act for Ofcom to use the MLAT procedure to serve notices issued under the Act,” the regulator said in its notice.

“The MLAT procedure is not an appropriate method of service for administrative investigations, but reserved for obtaining assistance in the investigation or prosecution of criminal offenses.”

That reasoning has been widely criticized as an attempt to circumvent international law by treating enforcement demands as “administrative” rather than legal.

The plaintiffs argue that Ofcom’s approach amounts to “coercive extraterritorial power,” warning that if the regulator wants information from U.S. companies, it must go through the Department of Justice and the courts, not by “emailing a webmaster and demanding records under threat of criminal penalty.”

The Broader Pattern of Global Censorship

Ofcom’s move follows a growing trend of foreign governments bypassing U.S. legal channels to demand content takedowns and user data from American tech firms.

Brazil’s Supreme Court, led by Justice Alexandre de Moraes, has done the same.

The radical judge’s efforts have prompted the U.S. government to impose sanctions on Brazilian officials over censorship and human rights concerns.

X has publicly warned that such actions “set a dangerous precedent for extraterritorial censorship disguised as regulatory enforcement.”

Ofcom’s Overreach Exposed

Ofcom justifies its letters by claiming that any site with “links to the UK,” such as having British users, falls under its jurisdiction.

In one notice, Ofcom cited 4chan’s seven percent UK user base as evidence that it “targets” Britain.

Legal experts call that argument absurd.

Under such logic, any global website with British visitors could be forced to obey UK speech laws, including American news sites and forums.

In the end, Ofcom’s attempt to act as the world’s speech police may have backfired.

Its strategy, ignoring the U.S. Constitution, dismissing MLAT procedures, and issuing fines it cannot collect, has now become a test case in how far a foreign government can go before hitting the hard limits of American sovereignty.

As Byrne put it: “Our objective is really to demonstrate the toothlessness of these global regimes in the United States.”

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/uk-government-first-amendment-doesnt-protect-americans-british-censorship-laws/

And,

READ MORE – Marco Rubio Announces Visa Restriction for Foreigners ‘Complicit in Censoring Americans’

Blogger Comment: This is all part of the Globalist Davos plan to try and con us into believing this is right, but where the WEF’s real plan in reality is to divide us and to make racial tensions move the world away from compassion and the wellbeing of mutually peaceful societies to ones that are against peace and understanding…one of the Globalist’s mindsets of control…

A new advertisement from Denmark’s state broadcaster is drawing attention for its messaging about genetics and diversity, reigniting discussion about political themes in Western advertising.

The commercial, which promotes a science program titled “Evolution,” features an on-screen “expert” interrupting a white Danish couple as they flirt.

The expert explains that Denmark’s history of war introduced foreign DNA into the national gene pool, which he says “protected them from disease.”

He then compares their relationship to inbreeding because they are both white and suggests they seek partners with more “exotic” genetics.

The woman then smiles as if intrigued by the idea.

The series first aired in 2020 but is now being re-released with the same “inbreeding” advertisements in 2025.

The tone of the new campaign stands in sharp contrast to the nation’s 2014 “Do It For Denmark” ads.

The ad campaign encouraged Danish couples to have more children to address the country’s declining birth rate.

WATCH: Click on the link to view the video below… Danish TV Commercial Shames Citizens for Starting Families with Other White People

Broader Trends in Advertising Representation

Observers have noted that the ad follows a broader trend of political or social themes in Western marketing, with campaigns often promoting messages around “diversity” and “inclusion.”

Data from the UK’s Channel 4 “Mirror” study found that while the UK population is approximately 83% white, black citizens, who make up about 4% of the population, appear in more than half of national television commercials.

Commentators have argued that this reflects a push for greater representation, though critics say it may not reflect demographic realities.

Advertising in both Europe and the United States has increasingly featured interracial couples, who make up roughly 10% of all marriages, according to U.S. and European data.

Social Media and Political Reactions

Public responses to these trends have varied.

Some argue that increased diversity in advertising reflects social progress, while others see it as an overcorrection or a politically motivated effort.

In the United States, controversy erupted earlier this year when American Eagle aired a jeans commercial featuring actress Sydney Sweeney, in which she discussed her “good genes.”

Some online commentators accused the brand and Sweeney of promoting “Nazi propaganda,” calling the language offensive.

The incident drew widespread attention to how advertising narratives, once focused primarily on consumer products, have become touchpoints in broader cultural and political debates.

Advertising as Social Messaging

Industry analysts note that advertising has long mirrored cultural priorities and public discourse.

While it remains a vehicle for selling goods and services, it increasingly serves as a platform for social commentary, reflecting evolving norms, values, and political perspectives.

The Danish advertisement and its reception illustrate how marketing campaigns can provoke debate over national identity, representation, and the

role of ideology in commercial media.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/danish-tv-commercial-shames-citizens-starting-families-white-people/

And,

READ MORE – Arizona Judge Caught Urinating Outside Courthouse: ‘This Is Disgusting’