World Freedom

A world-renowned Arctic scientist has spoken out to debunk the globalist “climate crisis” narrative and warn the public that the Earth is actually heading for a period of “global cooling.”

Leading polar expert Andrey Fedotov of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences declared that “warming is about to end” and the planet is about to enter an “ice age.”

“We will inevitably transition to an unfavorable cold,” he warned, according to the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS).

According to Fedotov, the director of the Limnological Institute of the RAS, the period of “unfavorable cold” will begin around 2030.

Fedotov issued the warning in a statement that was published by RAS, the country’s leading scientific institution.

According to the statement, Fedotov said:

“Warming is about to end.

“And the cause is not humans, but the interplay between the Sun and Earth.

“Currently, we are in a favorable period, but we will inevitably transition to an unfavorable [cold] one … around 2030-2035.”

Fedotov, a doctor of geological and mineralogical sciences, cited his studies of Lake Baikal and historic climate epochs.

“When the ice age comes, you will feel it immediately,” he warns.

Fedotov is urging the public to make preparations as such levels of cold would have a severe impact on the global food supply.

In an interview with the RAS, Fedotov explained his findings.

EXCERPT:

Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS): “In other words, what awaits us is not warming, but cooling. When?”

Andrey Fedotov: “Now we are in a prosperous period, but let’s move on to a disadvantaged one.

“It’s inevitable. According to my estimates, the transition should occur in 2030–2035.”

RAS: “So the Ice Age has already arrived, but we haven’t felt it yet?”

Fedotov: “No. When it comes, you will feel it immediately.”

RAS: “And what should be done now?

“Prepare felt boots, warm clothes, heaters?”

Fedotov: “I would start with food.

“Hungry in felt boots won’t last long.”

Meanwhile, as Western corporate media outlets continue to push the “climate crisis” narrative onto the public, Russian outlets rarely mention green agenda talking points.

Russian TV viewers would assume that “climate change” is not an established fact.

In doubt-inducing programs regularly aired by Russian state channels in the last decade, audiences are confronted with the message that the climate debate is ongoing.

Theories of imminent global cooling hold equal credibility to the consensus on human-induced warming promoted by the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

A 2020 episode of the show “The Most Shocking Hypotheses” on the state-controlled REN TV network aired claims that “global warming turned out to be a global scam.”

In the episode, the host briefly mentions that information in the show would contradict established science.

However, the host asserted that their purpose was to give the floor to another hypothesis so viewers could make their own conclusions.

“Isn’t it time for the whole world to save humanity from imminent doom?” the narrator asks.

“It turns out things are not so straightforward.

“Perhaps the climate apocalypse exists only in the inflamed minds of people, frightened by global media and the shocking predictions of scientists.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin has also voiced mixed rhetoric on climate during his two decades in power.

In 2003, Putin famously joked that Russians would not need to buy as many fur coats if global warming were real.

In 2019, he said that warming is proven to be caused by humans and argued that “nobody knows the causes of global climate change.”

In May, the RAS’s Eurasian Economic Integration Council said that Earth’s warming is not man-made and is primarily due to the “outflow of potassium isotope from the Earth’s depths.”

According to the council, this is linked to the “increasing emission of natural hydrogen, which creates ozone holes.”

Follow the link for the sourtce… https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-arctic-scientist-debunks-climate-crisis-warns-global-cooling-coming/

And,

READ MORE: Top Climate Scientist Blows Whistle, Admits ‘Crisis’ Is a Hoax

A heavily censored study has confirmed that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are responsible for surges in sudden deaths and deadly diseases.

The study has finally been published in a peer-reviewed medical journal after facing numerous censorship efforts that prevented the explosive findings from being made public.

A damning study has revealed that autopsy data shows Covid mRNA shots have overwhelmingly contributed to all-cause deaths around the world.

The bombshell study found that Covid shots are “directly” linked to a staggering 73.9% of all deaths.

The research team behind the study was made up of some of America’s leading oncologists, cardiologists, doctors, and scientists, including:

• Nicolas Hulscher
• Paul E. Alexander
• Richard Amerling
• Heather Gessling
• Roger Hodkinson
• William Makis
• Harvey A. Risch
• Mark Trozzi
• Peter A. McCullough

The study found that 73.9% of all deaths were “directly due to or significantly contributed to” by Covid mRNA injections.

The autopsy data exposes a direct link “between COVID-19 vaccination and death,” the researchers note in their study’s paper.

After being censored twice censored and blocked from public view, the peer-reviewed study has now been published in the journal Science, Public Health Policy and the Law.

The study was previously censored after it was published in journals such as The Lancet and Forensic Science International, owned by Elsevier.

The latest release of the Dr. McCullough-led study identifies 678 studies.

With a mean age of death at age 70.4 years, the cardiovascular system was the most implicated organ system among cases.

This was followed by hematological (17%), respiratory (11%), and multiple organ systems (7%).

In 21 cases, three or more organ systems were affected by the Covid “vaccines.”

The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days, suggesting temporal association.

Most deaths occurred within a week from the last vaccine administration.

A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as “directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination,” the study confirmed.

Of those vaccine-induced deaths, the primary causes of death include:

• Sudden cardiac death (35%)
• Pulmonary embolism (12.5%)
• Myocardial infarction (12%)
• VITT (7.9%)
• Myocarditis (7.1%)
• Multisystem inflammatory syndrome (4.6%)
• Cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%)

This study has finally been published amid a recent wave of bombshell evidence related to Covid vaccines.

Last week, Dr. McCullough, one of the world’s most revered medical experts, issued a warning to the public that Covid mRNA “vaccines” were created to “strict military criteria” to serve as a “bioweapon.”

The top doctor has been at the forefront of exposing the harms of the Covid mRNA injections.

McCullough raised the alarm in a new interview while revealing the devastating impact on humanity caused by the mass global vaccination campaign.

“As a doctor, I have never seen something so injurious to the human body,” McCullough revealed.

McCullough continued by citing multiple studies, alongside his own findings, that prove the injections have caused unprecedented levels of death and injury.

The mRNA from the injections “invades the brain,” he explains.

“It invades the heart,” he continues.

“It causes brain and heart damage.

“It invades the bone marrow.

“It stimulates antibodies to attack cells and platelets.”

“It causes blood clotting and damage to blood vessels like we’ve never seen.”

He also noted that data from the University of Pittsburgh shows that the “vaccines” cause cancer.

“Since when do we have a protein that actually injures the brain, injures the heart, the bone marrow, the immune system, causes blood clotting, and potentially causes cancer in a single protein?”  McCullough asked.

“It’s a weapon,” he concluded.

“According to strict military criteria, it’s a bioweapon.”

WATCH: Click on the link to view the video below… Renowned Cardiologist Drops Bombshell: Covid ‘Vaccine’ Is a ‘Bioweapon’

Meanwhile, a group of leading cardiologists in New Zealand has just revealed that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are spiked with a deadly “cardiotoxin” which has been identified as the sole cause of surging heart failure and sudden cardiac arrest deaths around the world, as Slay News previously reported.

The explosive revelation was announced during a cardiology meeting in Auckland, New Zealand.

The nation’s most respected heart specialists discovered that the spike protein generated by Covid mRNA injections is responsible for unprecedented spikes in heart failure, sudden deaths, and other deadly diseases.

As a result, New Zealand cardiologists are now recognizing Covid mRNA “vaccines” as a “cardiotoxin” – a substance that causes direct harm to the heart.

According to the cardiologists who made the admission, this toxic protein is the root cause of the alarming increase in heart-related illnesses and deaths.

Since the rollout of Covid mRNA shots in early 2021, heart failure has skyrocketed in both young and old patients.

Many healthcare professionals are now beginning to speak out about a growing public health crisis that the government and health authorities seem determined to ignore.

Folow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/censored-autopsies-study-confirms-covid-vaccines-caused-surge-sudden-deaths/

And,

READ MORE – Dutch Government Official Admits Covid Pandemic Was ‘Military Operation’: ‘Ministry of Health Obeys NATO’

A new warning sign just flashed for anyone paying attention to the rapid, coordinated shift toward synthetic “meat” and “dairy” as the global food supply is about to be flooded with a disturbing new product.

Beginning early next year, a new product will hit supermarket shelves that looks like milk, pours like milk, and is marketed as “real dairy” but was never touched by a cow.

The product, created by Israeli startup Remilk, is a fully lab-produced “milk” manufactured using genetically engineered microbes.

According to The Times of Israel, Remilk has partnered with Gad Dairies to launch two variants: 3% fat “milk” and a vanilla-flavored version under the brand New Milk.

A “Barista” line is also ready for cafés in days.

The fake milk product is set to be released in Israel first before being rolled out globally.

The company insists its cow-free drink tastes “exactly” like the real thing.

It’s sold as lactose-free, hormone-free, and cholesterol-free.

However, critics warn this is just the latest example of a globalist push to replace natural meat and dairy with lab-grown “alternatives” while conditioning the public to see synthetic “food” as normal.

Slay News has repeatedly reported on this trend, including the rise of lab-grown “meat,” insect-based proteins, hyperprocessed synthetic “foods,” and heavily engineered substitutes being quietly normalized and rolled into everyday supply chains.

This latest move is more of the same: a parallel food system built in labs, not farms.

And it’s expanding fast.

Another Step Toward a “Post-Cow Era” Whether Consumers Asked for It or Not

Remilk is one of several Israeli firms racing to build what some call a “post-cow” industry.

Strauss Group is already selling cow-free drinks and cream “cheese” through Imagindairy, using the same gene-edited fermentation techniques.

Supporters claim this is the future.

However, opponents argue that multinational food giants and biotech startups are now working hand-in-hand to phase out natural animal agriculture, and that governments appear eager to help them do it.

Remilk says it is already in talks to enter the U.S. market.

Canada has quietly approved its proteins for use in food manufacturing.

Singapore has opened the door as well.

European regulators, though slower, are preparing test facilities.

And U.S. companies like Brown Foods are developing “UnReal Milk,” a fully lab-grown dairy clone.

Once these products become mainstream, critics warn that the long-term implications for natural farming, food transparency, and public health could be immense.

What Exactly Is Lab-Grown “Milk”?

This so-called “animal-free dairy” is made using either mammary cell cultures or gene-edited microbes engineered to produce casein and whey when fed sugar.

Those proteins are then blended with industrial fats and carbs to create a milk-like substance.

Scientists admit the mixture still lacks key biological components of real dairy, such as immune cells, natural lipids, and other complex structures that living animals produce but labs cannot replicate.

Nevertheless, Remilk’s founders openly call this “real dairy without cows.”

Critics call it something else entirely: the next wave of hyperprocessed food formulas designed by biotech companies, sold by multinational conglomerates, and pushed into the food supply before consumers are fully aware of what they’re eating.

Public Trust Not Guaranteed, Regulators Still Scrambling

The biggest hurdles are obvious:

   • Cost barriers — bioreactors are expensive and rare.

   • Regulatory confusion — governments are scrambling to figure out how to label, regulate, or even define these products.

   • Allergen concerns — because they use identical proteins to real milk, they still trigger dairy allergies.

   • Missing natural components — lab milk may be “nutritionally identical” on paper, but scientists admit it cannot replicate the biological complexity of actual dairy.

And then there’s the public acceptance problem, which biotech companies know will take years to overcome.

Global Push Ignores Consumers

Israel leads the field, with Singapore trailing close behind.

The U.S., meanwhile, has already granted FDA approval for several lab-grown dairy proteins despite ongoing concerns about transparency and safety.

India, one of the world’s largest dairy-consuming nations, is also quietly testing precision-fermented proteins, but cultural attachment to real milk and regulatory uncertainty remain major roadblocks.

Yet, despite the push for such products by globalists, consumers are simply not interested.

Still, the momentum is unmistakable as synthetic dairy isn’t coming. It’s here.

Engineered Food System Built in Plain Sight

As Slay News has previously reported, these lab-grown products, whether synthetic dairy, cultured “meat,” or hyperprocessed insect protein, represent a dramatic shift in how global elites, biotech firms, and corporate-backed NGOs envision the future of food.

Natural farming is being replaced with stainless steel vats.

Living animals are being replaced with engineered microbes.

Essential, nutrient-rich foods are being replaced with lab-designed replicas.

Consumers are told it’s “innovative,” “ethical,” or “efficient.”

But the truth is far simpler, and far more alarming:

The world’s food supply is being flooded with synthetic products at an unprecedented speed, often with no debate, little transparency, and massive corporate pressure behind them.

Remilk’s “cow-free” New Milk is not just a new product.

It’s a signal.

A warning that the era of real, natural food is being quietly pushed aside in favor of a manufactured alternative controlled by a handful of powerful companies, and that this shift is accelerating faster than most people realize.

Slay News will continue exposing this trend as it develops.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/lab-grown-milk-will-soon-flood-global-food-supply/

And,

READ MORE – ‘Cloned Meat’ to Flood Canadian Food Supply Without Safety Reviews or Labeling

Blogger Comment: If anyone ever wanted to know what “very loosely” drafted legislation into Law for ‘assisted dying’ like that introduced into Canada means (Bill C-14 , Medical Assistance in Dying – MAiD – https://www.parl.ca/LegisInfo/en/bill/42-1/C-14 ) , and its latent consequences for the Canadian people have been, should look at Canada’s historical evidence and their skyrocketing change in numbers for those who are NOT terminally ill (what the Bill was initially introduced for ONLY)…as it is totally horrendous now for the reclassification of who is being euthanized and where they are not now predominantly for the terminally ill, but all sorts of other  “non-terminally ill” people…

Canada’s Liberal government has poured millions of taxpayer dollars into euthanizing citizens as the nation pushes to advance the most aggressive state-run eugenics regime since the Holocaust.

The rate at which the Canadian government is expanding and normalizing euthanasia under the socialized healthcare system was exposed in explosive new documents.

Tax dollars continue pouring into the government’s “assisted suicide” program, even as Canadians struggle to access basic healthcare, wait months for treatment, and report being pressured into lethal injections because they are poor, sick, or disabled.

According to government spending figures, Canada has spent over $16 million in taxpayer money on euthanizing citizens.

However, the spending hasn’t been a one-way street.

As Slay News previously reported, the Canadian government’s socialized healthcare system saved a staggering $136 million in 2024 by euthanizing patients instead of treating them.

In addition, Canada’s organ harvesting industry is now booming thanks to the surge of citizens being killed under the government’s “Medical Assistance in Dying” (MAiD) program.

The staggering funding figures were revealed this week in a written response to Conservative MP Tamara Jansen.

They confirm that the government is bankrolling what critics are calling the most aggressive state-run euthanasia regime since the horrors of 20th-century eugenics.

Millions Spent While Healthcare Collapses

The euthanasia agenda was started in 2016 under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

The MAiD program has continued to advance under Trudeau’s successor, Prime Minister Mark Carney.

Both Carney and Trudeau are listed as “agenda contributors” and “Young Global Leaders” by the World Economic Forum (WEF).

According to Health Minister Marjorie Michel’s official reply, the Liberals have spent more than $13 million since 2021 “administering” MAiD, plus an additional $3.4 million on research and practitioner training since 2016.

The breakdown shows a rapidly expanding program:

• $763,435 (2021–22)
• $3,220,911 (2022–23)
• $3,296,527 (2023–24)
• $3,296,527 (2024–25)
• $2,644,350 (2025–26)

This explosion of government spending comes while the average wait time for basic healthcare in Canada has soared to 27.7 weeks, pushing desperate citizens to choose state-sanctioned death over life.

Government Refuses to Track How Many Request Euthanasia Due to Poverty or Lack of Care

When asked what steps the government takes to monitor cases where Canadians seek euthanasia because they cannot access mental health services, palliative care, disability support, or basic assistance, the Liberal minister flatly refused to answer.

Her response: “None of the reasons listed … are among the eligibility criteria for MAID.”

In other words: the government is not tracking it — and doesn’t intend to.

But internal medical documents tell the truth.

Doctors Admit Canadians Are Choosing Death Because They Cannot Afford to Live

Leaked Ontario physician reports from 2024 reveal the real, devastating reasons people are turning to euthanasia:

A middle-aged worker with back and ankle injuries said the lack of government support left him “with no choice but” euthanasia.

An obese woman called herself “a useless body taking up space,” and a doctor claimed obesity counted as a “grievous and irremediable” condition — justifying assisted suicide.

Others cited profound loneliness, poverty, and abandonment by the healthcare system.

Doctors have confirmed that non-terminal people are being approved for euthanasia simply because they are poor, hopeless, or feel like a burden.

Fastest-Growing Euthanasia Program in the World

Since legalization, the Trudeau government has expanded the MAID regime 13-fold, transforming Canada into the global epicenter of state-facilitated death.

Euthanasia is now:

• The 6th-leading cause of death in Canada,
• Accounting for 4.1% of all Canadian deaths in 2022,
• With 13,241 lethal injections that year, a 31.2% increase from 2021.

Yet Statistics Canada refuses to list MAID in the country’s top 10 causes of death, claiming it categorizes “underlying illness,” not the administered lethal injection, as the primary cause.

Patients Who Refuse to Be Euthanized Are Being Shamed as “Selfish”

As healthcare deteriorates, chilling reports continue to surface of elderly and disabled Canadians being urged, pressured, and even guilted into ending their lives, including being called “selfish” for choosing to live.

For many, euthanasia isn’t a “choice.”

It is the only option the government is willing to provide.

New Fear: Canada’s Push to Euthanize Children

From our previous reporting, one of the most disturbing trends is the government’s ongoing push to expand euthanasia access to minors, including teenagers, and, in some proposals, even “mature minors” without parental consent.

Government Has Already Set the Stage

Parliament has repeatedly signaled its intent to:

• Extend MAID to minors with mental illness
• Consider requests from 14- to 17-year-olds
• Evaluate whether parents should be notified only “when appropriate”

These discussions have been accompanied by academic papers and parliamentary committee recommendations openly arguing that youth should be able to request assisted suicide on their own.

Doctors Already Reporting Pressure on Vulnerable Teens

As we previously covered, pediatric specialists have warned of:

• Clinicians “normalizing” euthanasia to depressed teens
• Teens with autism or trauma being evaluated for MAID
• Family members blindsided when doctors raise euthanasia during care planning

Disabled and Sick Children Are Already Being “Prepared”

Parents have come forward saying hospital social workers and mental health staff have raised MAiD during routine consultations for minors with:

• Chronic illnesses
• Mental health struggles
• Developmental disabilities

These are vulnerable kids, not terminally ill children in agony, yet the system is slowly grooming families to accept state-assisted death as part of “care.”

Where the Agenda Heads Next

The same government that:

• Spends millions expanding euthanasia
• Ignores Canadians dying on waitlists
• Refuses to track MAID requests tied to poverty

… is now exploring how to extend lethal injections to children.

This is the logical endpoint of the Trudeau government’s ideology:

A society where choosing death is easier and cheaper than choosing life.

A Modern Eugenics Program, Funded by Taxpayers

With millions poured into MAiD, collapsing healthcare, and growing pressure on the vulnerable, including children, critics warn Canada is no longer offering “assisted dying.”

It is administering death as a state solution.

A system this vast, this funded, and this aggressively expanded is not compassionate care.

It is policy by elimination, and the vulnerable are the ones being eliminated.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-government-spends-millions-tax-dollars-euthanizing-citizens/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Government Forcing Doctors to Euthanize Treatable Patients

Canada’s euthanasia regime is spiraling out of control, and now frontline doctors are coming forward with chilling warnings that the government is railroading treatable patients into “assisted suicide” instead of care.

Several doctors have come forward to lift the lid on the new protocols from Health Canada, the government’s taxpayer-funded healthcare system, that steer patients into the “Medical Assistance in Dying” (MAiD) program.

In a new exposé by filmmaker Frank Panico, three Canadian doctors blow the whistle on the government’s pressure to push patients into “choosing” euthanasia over more expensive treatments under the nation’s socialized healthcare system.

As Slay News has previously reported, the government is now Canadian government is now saving tens of millions of dollars a year by euthanizing patients instead of treating them.

Since euthanasia was first legalized under the Trudeau government in 2016, doctors have come under increasing pressure to relieve the burden on the healthcare system by killing patients.

Dr. Will Johnston of Vancouver, Dr. David D’Souza of Toronto, and Dr. Catherine Ferrier of Montreal revealed that federal protocols now require doctors to discuss euthanasia with vulnerable patients, presenting state-sanctioned death as a “treatment option.”

D’Souza, a family physician and pain specialist, warned that the government’s push is directly influencing patient decisions.

“If a physician is suggesting euthanasia as an option or a treatment option for their pain or their suffering, then that is a very serious thing,” D’Souza said.

“As a patient is more likely to take this option given that a health professional has suggested it.

“I think it does severe harm to the doctor-patient relationship when physicians are now allowed and even suggesting euthanasia as a means to end their suffering.”

His warning centers around Health Canada’s 2023 “Model Practice Standard for Medical Assistance in Dying.”

The guidelines mandate doctors and nurses to pressure patients into “choosing” euthanasia while discussing care, effectively redefining suicide as medicine.

The guideline states practitioners “must take reasonable steps to ensure persons are informed of the full range of treatment options,” explicitly including MAiD.

However, in many cases, patients are being denied access to treatments, leaving them with no other option than to “choose” euthanasia.

“Promises were lies — now doctors are being coerced”

Dr. Johnston, head of British Columbia’s Euthanasia Resistance Coalition, said the new regime breaks every promise Canadians were given when euthanasia was legalized.

“Promises were made that no doctor would ever be coerced to participate in euthanasia, no doctor or nurse would ever lose their job because they wouldn’t cooperate with euthanasia,” Johnston said.

“All of that was a complete fiction. All of those things have now happened.”

Johnston described a system where hospitals, nursing homes, and even palliative care units are being forced to host euthanasia killings, something the government originally insisted would never occur.

Doctors pushing death, not treatment

Montreal geriatric specialist Dr. Catherine Ferrier shared her own disturbing experience: doctors aggressively promoting MAID to a family member with brain cancer.

The first doctor gave him only two options: euthanasia or palliative sedation.

The doctor provided no psychological, social, or restorative alternatives, despite the patient’s vulnerable state.

Ferrier said even the psychiatrist referral focused solely on determining whether the patient was “competent” to choose euthanasia, not on helping him live.

“These two doctors were guys his age, and I’m convinced that they looked at him and said: ‘I wouldn’t want to be in his shoes so he’s better off dead,’” Ferrier said.

Disabled Canadians: Pressured to die because life is “too expensive”

The whistleblowers echoed recent revelations from Inclusion Canada CEO Krista Carr, who confirmed that disabled Canadians are being pushed toward euthanasia during routine appointments.

Her claims match leaked internal reports from Ontario doctors showing:

    • Patients are euthanized because they can’t afford to live

    • Individuals opting for death due to loneliness, poverty, or lack of home care

    • Providers labeling obesity as a “grievous and irremediable” condition to justify euthanasia

    • Injured workers told financial hardship “left them with no choice” but euthanasia

One case involved an obese woman who called herself a “useless body taking up space,” which a doctor claimed qualified her for euthanasia on medical grounds.

Canada’s euthanasia explosion: a global outlier

Since Trudeau’s Liberal government expanded MAiD, Canada has become home to the world’s fastest-growing euthanasia program, now 13 times larger than when it began.

Wait times for actual healthcare now average 27.7 weeks, driving desperate citizens to seek death instead of care.

Some elderly and disabled Canadians who refuse euthanasia say they’ve even been called “selfish” for choosing to live.

Euthanasia is now Canada’s sixth-leading cause of death.

However, Statistics Canada does not list it as such because it records the underlying illness, not the lethal injection, as the cause.

The numbers paint a grim picture

Health Canada confirmed 13,241 euthanasia deaths in 2022, a staggering 4.1% of all deaths, and a 31% jump from 2021.

And doctors warn that unless Canadians confront what’s happening, the trend will only accelerate.

The whistleblowers are sounding the alarm, warning that MAiD has gone from “rare and exceptional” to a government-backed shortcut for suffering, poverty, disability, and medical burnout.

“Assisted suicide” has now become a lethal substitute for actual care.

In a country where patients are waiting months for treatment but can receive euthanasia approval in days, the message is unmistakable:

Canada’s healthcare system is no longer saving lives; it’s eliminating the people who need it.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-government-forcing-doctors-euthanize-treatable-patients/

And,

READ MORE – Canada Pushes to Begin Euthanizing Children

Blogger Comment: When peopl are offered Euthanasia over help and treatment, you know that something has gone horribly wrong…period

Canada’s spiraling euthanasia system is once again under fire as heartbreaking new accounts reveal that a surging number of patients are being forced into “choosing” the government’s “assisted suicide” death program after being denied actual medical care under the nation’s collapsing socialized healthcare model.

An alarming number of Canadians are reporting that they have no other choice but to agree to be euthanized by the government, despite the supposed availability of treatments for their conditions.

As Slay News has previously reported, the government’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program is now saving tens of millions of dollars a year.

In 2024, the government saved over $136 million by euthanizing patients instead of treating them.

The latest chilling case to emerge is that of 84-year-old Cleo Gratton, a retired diamond driller from Chelmsford, Ontario.

Gratton’s story is sending shockwaves across the country.

He died earlier this month of natural causes, but only after being approved for the government’s “assisted suicide” scheme.

His family says the approval came directly after an appalling hospital experience that left him convinced death was preferable to returning to the facility.

Gratton suffered from heart disease and kidney failure.

But instead of receiving dignified care during a recent hospital stay, the CBC reports he spent a night in an emergency room, only to be transferred to a hallway on the seventh floor.

The taxpayer-funded doctors refused to give him the care he needed and convinced him that euthanasia would better serve the greater good.

“There were no lights; all the bulbs in that hallway had been completely removed,” his daughter Lynn said.

“Patients are passing by, nurses are going by, no privacy, no compassion, no dignity.”

She added that nurses had to use headlamps just to examine his feet.

The conditions were so degrading that Gratton told his family he would “rather die than go back.” Days later, he applied for MAiD — Canada’s euthanasia program now infamous for replacing care with chemical death.

Before his natural passing, Gratton pleaded with his family to expose what he endured: “Push, push, push for change… Make people aware of what’s going on.”

His family is honoring that wish.

A Pattern of Patients Being Denied Care — but Approved for Death

Gratton’s story is only the latest in a staggering pattern: Canadians who want medical treatment, home care, or palliative support are being told the only available option is assisted suicide.

Slay News has been tracking these cases for years, and they’re accelerating:

   • Norman Meunier (Quebec): A quadriplegic man who developed severe bedsores after being left on an ER stretcher for four days without a proper mattress. Overwhelmed and denied home care, he “chose” MAiD last year.

   • “Mrs. B” (Ontario): An 80-year-old woman denied hospice and palliative care. After her spouse became overwhelmed, she was assessed for MAiD and lethally injected shortly after.

   • Sathya Dhara Khovac (Winnipeg): A 44-year-old woman who repeatedly begged for home care resources but was refused. In her obituary, she wrote she “could have had more time” if she’d been given help. Instead, she was euthanized in 2022.

   • Sean Tagert (B.C.): A 41-year-old father who battled the system for years to receive home care that would allow him to remain close to his son. Unable to secure the support he needed, he felt he had “no other choice” but euthanasia in 2019.

   • Canadian veterans: A recent testimony revealed a surging number of veterans are being offered MAiD instead of the mental health support they requested.

These aren’t isolated incidents, however.

They’re a systemic feature of a government-run system using euthanasia as a cost-saving pressure valve for an overstretched and underfunded healthcare bureaucracy.

A Healthcare System Pushing Vulnerable Toward Death

Even as Gratton’s family praised the individual doctors and nurses, who they said are overworked and stretched thin, they warned that the system itself is failing.

“Why are they still taking in patients if we have an overcrowding issue and they have no place to put these people?” Lynn asked.

The answer is becoming clearer:

The system has an escape hatch after legalizing euthanasia.

Rather than investing in long-term care, home care, mental health support, or palliative medicine, Canada’s government has built the world’s most aggressive assisted suicide regime.

And it is increasingly used on the elderly, the disabled, the poor, and those simply unable to access basic support.

With the government pushing to expand MAiD to include mental illness, critics warn the system will shift from crisis to catastrophe.

Euthanasia Has Become the Default Option, Not the Last Resort

In a civilized society, assisted suicide would be a tragic last resort.

In Canada, it is becoming a routine substitute for care.

The chilling reality is that the Liberal Canadian government now sees “assisted suicide” as:

• A cost-saving mechanism.
• A release valve for a failing system.
• A quiet way to disappear the vulnerable.

This is not compassion.

It’s coercion through neglect.

And unless Canadians demand change, the stories will only grow more frequent and more horrifying.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/canadians-forced-choosing-euthanasia-denied-treatments/

And,

READ MORE – Canada Pushes to Begin Euthanizing Children

In a stunning rebuke of Britain’s escalating war on free speech, President Donald Trump’s White House is actively considering offering political asylum to UK citizens prosecuted under socialist Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s growing regime of “thought crime” laws.

It comes as the far-left government continued to persecute Britons for wrongthink, including silent prayer, anti-censorship activism, and online dissent.

The move, which insiders describe as serious and already under internal review, would extend America’s protection to British citizens targeted for what the White House views as peaceful expression criminalized by the radical Labour Party government.

According to senior administration sources, the discussions were heavily influenced by Elon Musk.

Musk has repeatedly highlighted the UK’s prosecution of citizens over “thought crimes.”

The tech mogul has been warning that Western free expression is collapsing in real time.

Officials are now evaluating specific cases, including Livia Tossici-Bolt.

Tossici-Bolt was prosecuted in March 2023 simply for holding a sign reading “Here to talk if you want” near a Bournemouth abortion clinic.

Similarly, Adam Smith-Connor, convicted over a silent vigil outside Poole Magistrates Court.

As Slay News recently reported, a pastor also received a warning from police that the bible verse on his camper may lead to his arrest for “hate speech.”

These cases became international flashpoints, illustrating Britain’s descent into speech policing.

A source close to the planning confirmed that the administration is “beginning to consider” extending protection beyond pro-life activists to a wider category of British dissidents, including gender-critical speakers, immigration critics, and even pro-abortion advocates who fall afoul of Starmer’s sweeping “thought crime” directives.

The White House is considering offering political asylum to British “thought criminals”, The Telegraph understands.

Read more here ⬇️

https://t.co/GF3IarnyIX pic.twitter.com/bvfc8UcDwv

— The Telegraph (@Telegraph) November 16, 2025 Click to accept marketing cookies and enable this content

This new asylum strategy mirrors President Trump’s October promise to welcome Europeans persecuted for opposing mass migration, prioritizing those “targeted for peaceful expression of views online.”

The administration has already demonstrated willingness to act.

Earlier this year, Trump granted refugee status to white South Africans, citing racial discrimination, even while pausing most other asylum admissions following his January inauguration.

Trump’s criticism of Europe’s political direction has been blunt and consistent.

At the United Nations, he warned EU leaders:

“You’re destroying your countries.

“They’re being destroyed.

“Europe is in serious trouble.

“They’ve been invaded by a force of illegal aliens like nobody’s ever seen before.

“Illegal aliens are pouring into Europe.”

He added that nations across the continent were “going to hell” because of unchecked mass migration.

WATCH: Click on the link to view the video below… Trump Drops the Hammer on UN Members: ‘Your Countries Are Going to Hell’

Over the weekend, in an interview with GB News, Trump linked Britain’s free speech crisis directly to its immigration meltdown, saying:

“If you don’t get [illegals] out, you’re not going to have a country left…

“You have areas in London where the police don’t even want to go anywhere near those areas.

“You have Sharia Law where they don’t even want to obey the laws of your country.”

The administration is simultaneously preparing to revoke the U.S. visa of Imran Ahmed — head of an NGO tied to Starmer’s chief of staff — after the group lobbied aggressively for online censorship rules. A source revealed that Starmer’s push for a U.S.-UK trade deal nearly collapsed over Tossici-Bolt’s prosecution, with one official warning: “no free trade without free speech.”

This broader asylum initiative follows Trump’s May 2025 deployment of a Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour (DRL) delegation to London, led by senior adviser Samuel Samson, to meet with arrested pro-life activists and reaffirm “the importance of freedom of expression in the UK and across Europe.”

The DRL team also examined cases like Lucy Connolly, who was jailed for a social media post calling for asylum hotels to be set on fire after the Southport murders — a conviction critics say exemplifies Britain’s shift toward policing thoughts rather than actions.

Trump also blasted British media outlet the BBC.

The president argued that he has “an obligation” to sue the outlet for pushing “fake news.”

Trump noted that if the BBC is publishing such blatant propaganda about him, who else are they smearing with false claims?

“Have they done it to your prime minister?” Trump asked.

“Have they done it to [Reform leader] Nigel [Farage]?”

WATCH: Click on the link to view the video below… Trump: ‘I Have an Obligation’ to Fight Back Against Media Propaganda

As Starmer’s Labour government accelerates its crackdown on dissent, from bans on silent prayer near clinics to sweeping online speech restrictions, Trump’s White House is signaling that the United States is prepared to become a refuge for those targeted under Britain’s widening censorship regime.

For many in the UK now facing prosecution for mere expression, America may soon be the only Western nation willing to defend their fundamental liberties.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/trump-considers-asylum-uk-citizens-persecuted-wrongthink/

And,

READ MORE – Trump to Deport UK Government-Linked Anti-Conservative Censorship Lobbyist

Belgium’s government has launched an unprecedented outreach campaign to its youth, sending letters to every 17-year-old in the country encouraging them to consider a year of voluntary military service once they turn 18.

The initiative was announced by Defense Minister Theo Francken.

Francken introduced the proposal earlier this year as a response to long-standing personnel shortages and what he calls the need to bolster Belgium’s reserve forces.

Parliament approved the plan last month, authorizing the Ministry of Defense to send personalized letters directly to minors.

In a post on X, along with photos of boxes filled with envelopes, Francken wrote:

“149,000 letters were sent out yesterday.

“All 17-year-olds in the country are being encouraged to learn about Defense in general and the voluntary military service year in particular. Let’s go!”

149.000 brieven gingen gisteren op de post. Alle 17-jarigen van het land worden warm gemaakt voor Defensie in het algemeen en voor het vrijwillige militaire dienstjaar in het bijzonder.

Let’s go! @BelgiumDefence  pic.twitter.com/UaStbvIHuC

— Theo Francken (@FranckenTheo) November 8, 2025 Click to accept marketing cookies and enable this content

While the program is technically optional, critics say the scale and tone of the initiative suggest Belgium may be preparing the public for a future return to mandatory service.

Francken denied the accusation, insisting that “the army can’t handle that logistically.”

Belgium, like many Western nations, is dramatically expanding its uniformed ranks.

According to the Brussels Times, the country aims to reach 34,500 active personnel, 12,800 reservists, and 8,500 civilian staff over the next decade.

Recruitment targets for 2026 include more than 4,800 new roles across the military, reserves, and support services.

Volunteer applicants aged 18–25 will initially be offered 500 reservist positions at a net monthly salary of €2,000.

A Wider European Trend

Belgium’s move mirrors similar actions across the European Union (EU).

Across the EU, governments are pushing young people toward military roles amid heightened geopolitical tensions.

The Netherlands now sends teenagers questionnaires to gauge interest in defense careers and already operates a voluntary service year.

Sweden brought back conscription in 2017.

Germany is debating a lottery-based requirement for 18-year-old males if voluntary recruitment falls short.

These efforts align with Brussels’ broader push for EU-wide defense expansion, frequently framed as a deterrent against potential Russian aggression.

Moscow rejects that narrative entirely, arguing that Western leaders are stoking fear to distract from internal political problems.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said the EU’s militarization is spiraling due to what he called “Russophobic frenzy,” warning the bloc is drifting toward a “Fourth Reich.”

As Europe accelerates its recruitment and defense integration policies, Belgium’s mass mailing campaign marks one of the clearest signs yet that the continent is preparing the next generation for a dramatically more militarized future.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/belgian-government-teenagers-voluntary-military-sevice/

And,

READ MORE – Pete Hegseth Vows to Restore U.S Military’s Warrior Mentality

A controversial art exhibit in Switzerland is drawing outrage for displaying a hyper-realistic sculpture of President Donald Trump strapped to a cross-shaped execution gurney and dressed in an orange prison jumpsuit.

The half-size sculpture is titled “Saint or Sinner?”

It was created by British artist Mason Storm and depicts Trump with his eyes closed and head tilted to the side, as if he has just been executed by lethal injection.

The piece, which was previously displayed in Vienna, Austria, went on display last Saturday at the Gleis 4 gallery in Basel.

It will remain on display through mid-November, according to Agence France-Presse.

Storm, a London-based artist who conceals his identity behind custom masks, described the work as intentionally ambiguous.

“Half life size Donny Trump, probably the most decisive politicians of the modern era, or past for that matter,” Storm wrote on Instagram.

“Despised by some beloved by others, so is he a saint on a cross or a sinner on the lethal injection gurney? You decide.”

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Mason Storm (@masonstormgenius) Click to accept marketing cookies and enable this content

He added in a statement:

“In a world increasingly driven by polarized narratives, this work offers a moment of reflection, urging us to take responsibility — and to realize that every decision tells a story.”

Despite claiming neutrality, Storm’s online comments make clear his personal animus toward the president.

“He’s not the messiah, he’s a very naughty boy!” he wrote in a separate post.

Gallery Reverses Course After Safety Fears

The sculpture was initially set to appear at Basel’s central train station, but Gleis 4 canceled the pop-up event, citing “expected large crowds and feared disturbances.”

Instead, the gallery quietly installed the piece last week in a display window along Kunstmeile, an indoor pedestrian walkway in downtown Basel.

According to France24, the sculpture has already been purchased by “an internationally renowned figure living in Europe,” whose identity remains confidential.

Bishop Hermann Glettler of the Diocese of Innsbruck condemned the work as “simply deviant.”

Part of a Broader Pattern of Anti-Trump Imagery

The exhibit follows years of violent and demeaning portrayals of President Trump in popular culture.

A 2017 New York theater production staged a mock assassination of Trump in a modern retelling of Julius Caesar.

In a career-destroying moment, comedian Kathy Griffin also infamously posed for a photo holding a prop of Trump’s decapitated head.

This latest display comes as surveys show a disturbing normalization of political violence on the Left.

A poll conducted in April by the Network Contagion Research Institute and Rutgers University’s Social Perception Lab found that 55% of respondents identifying as left-of-center said assassinating Trump would be at least “somewhat justified.”

When asked about the September 2024 assassination attempt at Trump’s Florida golf course, 28% of Democrats said it “would have been better” if the president had been killed.

The recurring pattern of violent imagery and rhetoric toward the president, now extending into European “art” galleries, underscores how anti-Trump sentiment has moved beyond political opposition and into open celebration of harm.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/european-art-exhibition-features-sculpture-trump-crucifix/

And,

READ MORE – Europe Criminalizes Large Cash Payments Ahead of ‘Digital Euro’ Launch

Blogger Comment: Now Canada has gone rogue again in not informing their people that there meat food can be either normal livestock sourced or cloned…as they are not telling the Canadian people on the labels, so they do not know what they are consuming…this is not just unethical in not informing the public-at-large, but health questions, as there has been NO LONG TERM research into the side effects of this transition in food source, just like the mRNA injections that they told us were ‘safe and effective’, but where global research states very differently indeed and where even the inventors of mRNA technology say that it is not safe or effective based upon worldwide research…as previously all vaccines were tested on average for over 10-years before they were released onto the public, after rigorous testing and over a decade in feedback by the medical profession…this is therefore insane, but criminal to say the very least…and not scientific progress, but regressive science with no long-term basis behind it…

“Cloned meat” is about to enter Canadian grocery stores without safety testing, disclosure, or labeling of any kind, after Health Canada quietly dismantled its 22-year policy that protected the public food supply from such products.

The Canadian government’s previous policy treated cloned products as novel foods requiring pre-market review.

The decision removes all oversight and allows cloned “meat” and “milk” products, and the offspring of cloned animals, to be sold to millions of Canadians with no indication whatsoever of their lineage.

The move immediately set off alarm bells in the United States.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved cloned meat back in 2008 and allowed it to flood the food supply without labels.

Many Americans are only now discovering that they have likely been eating cloned products for years.

Online, the reaction has been explosive, with users calling the situation unacceptable and demanding transparency.

Some say they likely purchased cloned products unknowingly, blasting regulators for failing consumers and hiding the true origins of what is being sold on store shelves.

Opposition to cloned meat spans ethical, religious, and safety concerns.

Critics warn of serious animal-welfare issues, pointing to high rates of clone miscarriages, deformities, suffering, and death.

Others warn about potential contamination from antibiotics or hormones used on sick clones, animals that would never survive long enough to enter the food chain directly, but whose offspring do.

Ethical concerns also run deep, with many uncomfortable about the technology itself or warning that its normalization could open the door to attempts at human cloning.

Cloned meat is banned entirely in Europe.

In Europe, cloning farm animals and selling products from their offspring is illegal.

However, Canada is moving in the opposite direction.

Beginning next year, cloned animals and their descendants will no longer be considered novel foods, eliminating all safety assessments and all labeling requirements.

The process begins by creating a genetically identical copy of a “desirable” animal.

That clone is then bred normally, and its offspring enter the food chain, indistinguishable from traditional meat, except consumers are never told what they’re buying.

The decision has sparked strong backlash from producers like duBreton, a major Certified Humane and organic pork supplier.

The company issued a warning to Canadians:

“People have the right to choose for themselves.

“Quietly changing the definition of a novel food takes that choice away.”

Health Canada’s justification mirrors the FDA’s longstanding position that regulators claim cloned meat and milk are “not materially different” from traditional products and therefore do not require labels.

In the U.S., regulators expect that it is mostly the offspring of clones, not the clones themselves, that end up in the food supply.

But without mandatory labeling, American consumers have no reliable way to know whether their purchases come from cloned lineage.

Consumer advocates argue that the lack of transparency is unacceptable and that regulators are pushing cloned meat into stores without giving the public any meaningful way to make informed choices.

The Center for Food Safety blasted the FDA’s stance, saying:

“FDA’s decision flies in the face of massive public opposition to animal cloning, widespread scientific concerns about the risks of eating food from clones, and troubling animal cruelty and ethical concerns associated with the cloning process.

“The FDA admitted in its own risk assessment that a vast quantity of animal clones are unhealthy and would not be suitable for the food supply.”

Meanwhile, cloning technology continues to advance rapidly.

Scientists have successfully cloned rhesus monkeys, including a healthy clone named Retro born in 2020, hailed by researchers as a breakthrough that “turned impossible to possible.”

Last year, China successfully cloned Tibetan goats using the same technique used to clone Dolly the Sheep in 1996.

Now, Canada is preparing to introduce cloned meat into grocery stores without telling the public.

For millions of consumers on both sides of the border, cloned meat is here, and regulators don’t plan to warn you.

Click on the link below to view the source…

‘Cloned Meat’ to Flood Canadian Food Supply Without Safety Reviews or Labeling

And,

READ MORE – Real Meat Much Healthier Than Fake Plant-Based ‘Alternatives,’ Study Finds