World Freedom

Blogger Comment: Canada and its political leaders (all World Economic Forum (The WEF) members and some very senior like Carney) are now wanting to euthanize children and even as young as babies, just like the WEF has long stated in some of their addresses in Davos (not on humanitarian grounds either and just because they had something wrong with them when they were born or have been affected by something after birth)…but where, the Canadian children DO NOT have to be “terminally ill” to be eligible for termination, as that is the only word to describe this new political expansion of their euthanasis programme in what they are literally doing now…many say pure evil and asking the pointed question, what has happened in a mere 9-years since Canada introduced euthanasia for the terminal ill ONLY, as it certainly not that now and encompasses a plethora of other reasons to euthanize people that were never envisioned in 2016, which are constantly growing by political will to euthanize even more Canadian people…and not at all linked to being “terminally ill“…therefore the WEF and their loyal servants have a great deal to answer for to humanity here as usual and that is perfectly clear now…former PM Trudeau for bringing the Act into force, with very little checks and balances, to go rogue,  and PM Carney in particular for allowing what appears to be a crime against humanity now !…where even children’s lives at stake now…

Canada is once again facing outrage over its rapidly expanding euthanasia regime, as powerful advocacy groups are now pressuring the federal government to open the door to euthanizing children.

The move comes even as Canada already runs one of the most permissive “assisted suicide” systems on the planet.

The Canadian government no longer requires a terminal illness to euthanize citizens, and that has increasingly targeted society’s most vulnerable.

The poor, the disabled, the chronically ill, people suffering from depression and autism, and even veterans seeking help for PTSD, are all being euthanized by the Liberal government.

Now, activists want to take it even further.

Under current law, adults can apply for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) even if they are not dying, so long as they have a chronic illness, a disability, or they are experiencing “suffering.”

But organizations such as Dying with Dignity Canada are lobbying for a seismic expansion by opening MAiD to children who are determined to be so-called “mature minors.”

Advocates argue that children who can “demonstrate full decision-making capacity” should be eligible for euthanasia.

Their proposal includes parental consent for those 15 and younger, but astonishingly, they claim the government should be allowed to euthanize 16- and 17-year-olds without their parents’ involvement.

Canada’s own lawmakers appear sympathetic.

In February 2023, the Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying made a stunning declaration:

“Eligibility for MAiD should not be denied on the basis of age alone.”

That single line set off alarm bells across the world.

A Disturbing Pattern

This latest push follows the same trend exposed in our earlier reports: every “safeguard” in Canada’s euthanasia law is temporary, and every temporary limit becomes the next political battleground.

Over the past several years:

• Disabled Canadians who couldn’t afford housing were offered MAID instead of support.
• Veterans requesting help for PTSD were encouraged to consider euthanasia by government caseworkers.
• People with treatable illnesses reported being steered toward assisted suicide as a cheaper alternative to care.

And in earlier expansions, authorities insisted these cases were “rare” or “isolated.”

Yet each scandal was followed by new pressure campaigns to widen access even further.

This is why critics warn that allowing child euthanasia is not a hypothetical fear, as it becomes the next logical step in a program that has already moved far beyond its original scope.

The Next Battleground: Mental Illness

The ruling Liberal Party government has not yet officially embraced the “mature minors” expansion.

However, the idea is already expected to resurface in 2027, when MAiD crosses its next chilling milestone.

In 2027, the government begins rolling out an expansion to MAiD laws to begin euthanizing people whose only medical condition is a mental illness.

That expansion has already been delayed multiple times due to public backlash, but activists remain determined to implement it.

Once mental-illness-only MAiD is approved, opponents warn that pressure for teens and young adults suffering from depression, anxiety, trauma, or gender dysphoria could become impossible to contain.

‘Mission Creep’ Has Become the Norm

International human-rights organizations have repeatedly flagged Canada’s euthanasia program as one of the most dangerous in the world, pointing out that “safeguards” disappear with each legislative review.

Proving their point, Canada’s own committees have already adopted language implying that age is not a legitimate barrier, opening the door to the next phase of normalizing state-sanctioned death for minors.

For critics, this is a line that no civilized nation should cross.

As the debate intensifies, it has become clear that every time Canadians are told MAiD expansion will “stop here,” the government’s own bureaucracies quietly prepare for the next round.

The 2027 expansion will be a major turning point that will reveal whether the world’s most aggressive euthanasia system is poised to target children next.

READ MORE – Canadian Man Devastated After Government Euthanizes Both Grandmothers

Blogger Comment: It is the Swiss Davos Globalists who are behind this to change humanity forever for their own purpose, as the control most of the Tech Giants in Silicone Valley and worldwide through BlackRock, Vanguard et al and where their CEO’s are just their corporate pawns and institutional puppets, just like all western leaders now except those that still control their own countries that are, the USA, Hungary, Slovakia and Italy, as all the rest have fallen to the Globalist’s financial and economic power together with blackmail, exposure and criminal sedition behind closed doors…and you should do your own research if you do not know this already…

Silicon Valley power players are bankrolling a new frontier that many experts say crosses every ethical line imaginable: genetically engineered human embryos.

Backed by some of the biggest names in tech, newly funded startups are pushing ahead with research that could one day produce lab-designed children, all while operating in legal gray zones and openly eyeing foreign jurisdictions to dodge U.S. restrictions.

The Wall Street Journal first exposed the rapidly developing effort, revealing that startups like Preventive, founded earlier this year by CRISPR scientist Lucas Harrington, are securing millions to explore embryo editing.

Their pitch is eliminating hereditary diseases.

However, the push is triggering major concerns that it is opening the door to designer babies and a future dictated by tech-driven eugenics.

Millions Flow from Silicon Valley Elites

Preventive has already raised $30 million from elite investors, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong.

The San Francisco–based company calls itself a public-benefit corporation devoted to the “responsible advancement of genome editing technologies applied before birth to benefit humanity.”

Harrington, who trained under Nobel-winning CRISPR pioneer Jennifer Doudna, insists the firm’s mission is humanitarian, targeting devastating genetic illnesses like sickle cell disease and cystic fibrosis.

“We are not trying to rush things,” he told the Journal.

“We are committed to transparency in our research and will publish our findings, whether positive or negative.”

But behind the scenes, sources told the paper that the company has already examined other countries, including the United Arab Emirates, as potential locations where human embryo editing could be performed.

Harrington claimed this was due to U.S. regulatory barriers rather than an attempt to escape oversight.

Tech Billionaires Cheer On Embryo Engineering

Sam Altman’s husband, Oliver Mulherin, reportedly guided their investment.

Mulherin describes the effort as a way to “help families avoid genetic illness.”

Brian Armstrong was even more explicit, declaring on X that he was “excited” to support Preventive.

Armstrong argues that it is “far easier to correct a genetic defect in an embryo than to treat disease later in life.”

The influx of billionaire funding mirrors a larger tech-driven push into reproductive genetics.

Startups such as Manhattan Genomics and Bootstrap Bio are already exploring research paths that would likely require trials outside the United States.

However, American regulators and bioethicists are increasingly sounding the alarm.

Illegal in the U.S.

Genetically engineering embryos intended for pregnancy remains illegal under U.S. federal law.

The FDA is barred from even reviewing applications for such trials.

Most nations worldwide have similar bans in place, specifically to prevent a repeat of the catastrophic He Jiankui incident in China, where CRISPR-edited twins were born in 2018.

The long-term effects on those children are still unknown.

Despite that history, the new Silicon Valley–funded wave is pushing boundaries again.

Experts Warn of Eugenics

Fyodor Urnov, a leading scientist at UC Berkeley’s Innovative Genomics Institute, issued one of the starkest warnings in the Journal:

“They are either lying, delusional, or both.

“These people, armed with very poorly deployed sacks of cash are working on ‘baby improvement’.”

Urnov and other critics argue that commercial embryo editing will inevitably move beyond medical necessity into enhancing traits like intelligence or physical ability.

It’s the exact territory modern society vowed never to revisit.

An Unfolding Nightmare

Harrington and his advisers maintain that the technology will be used only for severe hereditary conditions and not for cosmetic or enhancement purposes.

They argue that for families facing unavoidable genetic diseases, embryo editing represents hope.

But the combination of billionaire money, fledgling regulation, and an industry openly considering offshore trials has raised the alarms of those who warn that Silicon Valley is now attempting to rewrite human biology itself.

Yet, there is no democratic mandate and enormous potential for abuse.

If this trajectory continues, the coming decade may determine whether gene-edited children become a fringe experiment… or an elite-driven reality.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/silicon-valley-elites-pump-cash-banned-genetically-modified-babies-research/

And,

READ MORE – Multiple Experts Predict AI Technology Will Destroy Humanity

Blogger Comment: This is the real insane face of the Davos Globalists who control now all western nation except the USA, Hungary, Slovakia and Italy and what they do for ‘sport’ where you had better get used to it, as it is coming to you by 2039 when they take over the western world by 2030..how do we know, they have stated so since 1971 when the World Economic Forum (WEF) was created and when the most disastrous economic decision was ever made for the American people and humanity when the US Dollar came off the Gold Standard (all planned of course by the Globalist elites in Switzerland) and ever since the Globalists elites (consisting of over 1,235 US$ billionaires including BlackRock, Vanguard et al) have made sure that the USA and the West is destroyed every year since, as their Presidents since 1971 and up to 2016 were all the Globalists’ political puppets, just taking orders from these insane people…come 2030 you will know and see the fullness of these absolutely mad people..for sure…

Chilling details are emerging of a so-called “human safari” in which powerful Western elites paid large sums of money to hunt and kill civilians, including children, during “sniper tourist” trips in Europe.

Italian authorities have launched a shocking investigation into allegations that wealthy individuals from Western nations paid as much as $90,000 for “sniper safaris” during the Bosnian War.

The trips allegedly allowed elite thrill-seekers to shoot unarmed civilians in Sarajevo for sport.

The complaint, filed by journalist Ezio Gavazzeni, describes an almost unimaginable level of barbarism.

Gavazzeni uncovered evidence that foreign elites were allegedly coordinating with Bosnian Serb forces to treat a besieged war zone as a private hunting ground.

During the so-called “sniper tourist” trips, innocent men, women, and even children became human targets.

The civilians were hunted down, shot, and killed for the entertainment of rich and powerful elites.

Gavazzeni began investigating after watching a 2022 documentary.

He said the participants had no ideological motive whatsoever.

“There were Germans, French, English … people from all Western countries who paid large sums of money to be taken there to shoot civilians,” he stated.

He said these individuals were driven purely by depraved pleasure.

“There were no political or religious motivations,” Gavazzeni explains.

“They were rich people who went there for fun and personal satisfaction.

“We are talking about people who love guns who perhaps go to shooting ranges or on safari in Africa.”

According to the allegations, participants could even pay an additional fee to target children.

The organizers are turning the real-life nightmare of the Sarajevo siege into a paid “experience” for the wealthy.

WATCH: Click on the link to view the video below… Wealthy Elite ‘Sniper Tourists’ Paid to Shoot & Kill Civilians During ‘Human Safari’

A spokesperson for the Bosnian Consulate in Milan confirmed they are cooperating with investigators.

In a statement, officials stressed the gravity of the case:

“We are impatient to discover the truth about such a cruel matter in order to close a chapter of history.

“I am in possession of certain information I will be sharing with the investigators.”

The claims echo the darkest depictions of elite depravity.

Observers have compared the allegations to HBO’s Westworld, where ultra-wealthy tourists engage in violence, rape, and murder inside a simulated Old West theme park.

In the show, like the movie it was based on, guests justify their brutality because the victims aren’t human.

However, the story exposes how such moral detachment breeds monstrous behavior.

Here, the parallel is even more horrifying as the alleged “sniper tourists” were not shooting robots or simulations.

They were hunting real human beings.

Those who participated were murdering civilians trapped in one of the 20th century’s most brutal sieges.

Yet, they were treating the killings as recreation.

The accusations reinforce long-standing fears about what happens when unchecked privilege meets total moral decay.

From Jeffrey Epstein’s operation, to whispered rumors of underground “elite” rituals, to scandals involving trafficked victims and unpunished crimes, these revelations fit a disturbing pattern:

When the powerful believe they are untouchable, humanity becomes expendable.

Italian prosecutors are now working to verify the allegations.

If confirmed, this would expose yet another hidden chapter of elite brutality, where war became a playground, human life became currency, and the boundaries of cruelty were pushed far beyond what the public ever imagined.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/wealthy-elite-sniper-tourists-paid-shoot-kill-civilians-human-safari/

And,

READ MORE – Epstein Emails: Hillary Clinton Had Secret Affair with Vince Foster Shortly Before He ‘Committed Suicide’

President Donald Trump’s administration has revealed sweeping fraud inside the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), top officials have announced.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins revealed that at least 186,000 deceased individuals were receiving benefits.

However, the huge number is expected to grow further once data from Democrat-run states is finally disclosed.

Rollins detailed the findings while addressing concerns surrounding SNAP, describing the scale of fraud as staggering.

She explained that on her first day in office, she sent a letter to all 50 states requesting full recipient data.

The requested data includes names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and addresses.

Rollins explained that the federal government had never requested that information before.

In a post on X, Rollins said that she issued the request “so we could make sure illegal immigrants aren’t getting benefits meant for American families,” adding:

“The Democrat Party has turned its back on working Americans and built its entire strategy around protecting illegal aliens.

“They know if the handouts stop, those illegals will go back home, and Democrats will lose 20+ seats after the next census.”

Rollins said that 29 states, mostly red states, complied and submitted their data in February, March, and April.

“29 states — mostly the red states — responded with their data sets, February, March, April; so the numbers that you’re talking through, those are numbers that we have been collecting and analyzing since early summer/late spring,” she said.

What her team discovered was far more alarming than initial reports suggested.

Rollins revealed that early media reports on 5,000 dead people receiving benefits represented only a fraction of the truth.

“The fact that this spotlight shined on SNAP has allowed us to talk about it.

“But here’s the most unbelievable news I have [learned] really just over the last few days:

“That 5,000 dead people, that was just one month; the number is closer to 186,000 deceased men and women and children in this country are receiving a check.

“That is what we are really going to start clamping down on. Half a million are getting two [checks].”

She added that these findings come only from the 29 states that responded.

“But here’s the really stunning thing,” she continued.

“This is just data from those 29, mostly red, states. Can you imagine when we get our hands on the blue state data, what we’re gonna find?

“It’s gonna give us a platform and a trajectory to fundamentally rebuild this program, have everyone reapply for their benefit, make sure that everyone that’s taking a taxpayer benefit through SNAP or food stamps, that they literally are vulnerable and they can’t survive without it.”

WATCH:

BREAKING: Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins to OVERHAUL entire SNAP program after major fraud exposed

– 186,000 dead people receiving benefits– 500,000 recipients are getting double benefits– every recipient will need to reapply to verify “they can’t survive without it”… pic.twitter.com/J2UE23KMTa

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) November 14, 2025Click to accept marketing cookies and enable this content

The Trump administration is now preparing aggressive reforms to eliminate fraud, remove ineligible recipients, and restore SNAP as a program intended for vulnerable Americans, not foreign nationals, duplicate filings, or the deceased.

More announcements are expected as the Department of Agriculture continues analyzing the data and presses remaining states to comply with federal requests.

Folow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/trump-admin-uncovers-huge-number-dead-people-receiving-snap-benefits/

And,

READ MORE – SNAP Beneficiaries Threaten to Loot Stores Over Democrat Shutdown: ‘It Is the Taxpayer’s Job to Pay for My Kids to Eat’

FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi have released explosive new files to Congress showing how Bill and Hillary Clinton’s foundation collected foreign and domestic donations from those seeking influence over the U.S. government.

However, these payments were never investigated fully for influence-peddling schemes.

The files are being called the “Clinton Corruption Files,” and Patel and Bondi plan to make them public in the next week or two once some information related to the whistleblowers is removed.

The evidence will show that there was an effort “to obstruct legitimate inquiries into the Clinton Foundation by blocking real investigation by line-level FBI agents and DOJ field prosecutors and keeping them from following the money,” an official who has seen the files said.

The Clinton Foundation was started after Bill left office in 2000.

However, some of the contributions were received while Hillary served as Secretary of State under Barack Obama.

Cash again started to flow into the organization when Hillary Clinton ran for president in 2016.

Yet, the flood of donations mysteriously stopped when Hillary was defeated by President Donald Trump.

Whistleblowers in 2015 said that some of the documents and evidence were kept from investigators in Little Rock, Arkansas.

The Democrat power couple lived in Little Rock before Bill Clinton became president.

The investigation was soon shut down by order of Obama Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, a Clinton ally.

If the evidence bears out, it appears that former President Joe Biden wasn’t the first powerful executive branch figure to run a pay-to-play scheme out of the White House.

In fact, there were three separate investigations into the Clintons that were all shut down by Yates.

According to Trump officials, the documents show that lower-level FBI agents and prosecutors prevented evidence from getting to decision makers in the multiple investigations of the Clinton Foundation.

It’s not at all surprising that damning evidence about the Clintons was buried so deeply that it never came to light.

Anyone familiar with the speculation surrounding the Clinton Foundation for years will not be surprised by the revelations by Patel and Bondi.

Republicans long thought that the foundation was a corrupt vehicle for influence peddling.

However, they never had any hard evidence until now.

Unfortunately, the statute of limitations on influence peddling is five years.

So, unless there is evidence of a crime without a statute of limitations, the Clintons will once again get off scot-free.

Other than propping up their legacies, the Clintons don’t appear phased by such allegations.

Nevertheless, exposing the scheme would give away the Democrat playbook.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/doj-bombshell-clinton-corruption-files-exposing-foundations-foreign-funding/

And,

READ MORE – Ted Cruz Puts Anti-Trump Activist Judges on Notice

Podcast host Joe Rogan criticized the BBC this week following revelations that the network deceptively edited footage of President Donald Trump’s January 6, 2021, speech.

Rogan is calling the scandal evidence of “the deep rot” within mainstream media.

The controversy stems from a BBC “Panorama” documentary that aired recently about Trump’s remarks before the U.S. Capitol protest on January 6, 2021.

The program has drawn widespread backlash after viewers discovered that editors omitted Trump’s call for supporters to protest “peacefully” and spliced together lines spoken nearly an hour apart, making them appear as a single continuous statement.

Producers also added additional background noise to make the crowd of Trump supporters sound menacing.

Trump’s legal team has since threatened to file a $1 billion lawsuit against the BBC if the “false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements” are not immediately retracted.

The fallout has already led to the resignations of BBC News CEO Deborah Turness and Director-General Tim Davie, both of whom stepped down amid the growing controversy.

Rogan Calls It ‘Propaganda, Not Journalism’

Discussing the issue on his popular podcast, Rogan said the edited documentary represented “not journalism, but full-on lying and propaganda.”

“It seems like these people—this is just my opinion—felt justified for completely lying, because it would lead to an ultimate good,” Rogan said.

“So they lost all journalistic integrity.

“And it is the BBC, which is like the height of journalistic integrity.”

Rogan argued that the scandal undermines public confidence in traditional news organizations.

“If that doesn’t show the rot of mainstream, corporate-controlled media, then nothing does. Because that’s pure rot,” he said.

“At the top of the heap, if someone quoted a source and it was the BBC, I’d think, ‘OK, that’s like The Washington Post or The New York Times.’

“It’s a very official source, so I’d assume, ‘This must be real.’”

Rogan said the incident marked a turning point for how audiences view legacy media outlets.

“They turned it into activism, and they turned it into lying — and they did it in front of everyone, where you could clearly just listen to the full speech and know he didn’t say that,” Rogan said.

“That’s not how he said it at all.”

WATCH: Click on the link to view the video below… Joe Rogan: BBC ‘Felt Justified in Completely Lying’ About Trump

Growing Backlash Over BBC Credibility

The controversy has sparked renewed debate over media ethics and editorial accountability, particularly within publicly funded broadcasters.

Critics argue that the BBC’s editing of Trump’s remarks reflects a broader erosion of trust in major news outlets.

The network has yet to publicly release an unedited version of the footage, though it has issued a brief statement acknowledging “editorial errors” and pledging to “review internal standards.”

The incident follows similar recent controversies involving major Western media organizations accused of selective editing or misrepresentation in politically sensitive coverage.

Trump, for his part, said the BBC documentary was “a deliberate fraud” and accused the network of attempting to “rewrite history” by distorting his remarks about January 6.

The legal demand sent by Trump’s attorneys gives the BBC a limited window to retract or correct the segment before the lawsuit proceeds.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/joe-rogan-bbc-felt-justified-completely-lying-trump-propaganda/

And,

READ MORE – Trump Gives BBC Ultimatum: Apologize for ‘False, Defamatory’ Reporting or Face $1 Billion Lawsuit

Blogger Comment: Yet another scandal with Canada’s Euthanasia programme that is accelerating at rate of knots not seen anywhere else in the world and to their military veterans now who kept the Canadian people safe and put their lives on the line for their nation…what a way to thank them by their Davos Globalist Carney Liberal Government and what they are doing to them is utterly disgraceful, where their government is forgetting what they have done for their nation and where now this appears to be a no holds bar situation to specifically  eliminate them as they are now seen it appears, as a cost to the nation for them to exist…why would anyone do this who has any human moral compass, but where it shows how this euthanasia programmes are manipulated to the governments narrative and unrestricted outcomes…for them in power…

An alarming testimony before Canada’s House of Commons has blown open grave allegations that the Liberal government is ramping up pressure to euthanize military veterans under the nation’s rapidly expanding “assisted suicide” regime.

The explosive allegations were revealed in a parliamentary testimony from Kelsi Sheren, a Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) veteran.

Sheren told MPs during a hearing before the Canadian Veterans Affairs Committee that she has firsthand evidence showing the practice is far more widespread than officials admit.

She told the nation’s top lawmakers that she has evidence that multiple veterans have been pressured into being euthanized under the government’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program.

Sheren testified that “over 20 veterans have confirmed being offered MAiD” instead of more expensive treatments.

“I have the proof, and I have proof of more,” she told lawmakers.

The claims follow recent reports that Canada’s socialized healthcare system is now saving $136 million a year by euthanizing patients instead of treating them.

During the hearing, Conservative MP Blake Richards asked Sheren if she was willing to provide evidence supporting her claims.

Sheren confirmed that the veterans have submitted written testimonies or “actual audio recordings” documenting the unsolicited offers of euthanasia.

According to Sheren, many others remain silent out of fear.

“We also have other individuals who are too afraid to come forward because Veterans Affairs has threatened their benefits,” she said.

Sheren, a Canadian combat veteran and artillery gunner, added that some were even offered non-disclosure agreements and “payouts if they were to take it.”

Veterans Affairs Canada told media outlets that its “employees have no role or mandate to recommend or raise (MAiD).”

Yet similar allegations have surfaced before.

Last year, it was revealed that the federal department responsible for supporting Canadian veterans had apparently acted to suppress documentation on euthanasia practices.

It followed reports that caseworkers attempted to railroad struggling former service members into euthanasia.

Slay News previously published a report highlighting bombshell revelations from Sheren on the treatment of veterans.

Sheren explained on a podcast with Dr. Jordan Peterson last year that the drugs used in MAiD essentially waterboard a person to death.

Assisted suicide was legalized in 2016 by the Liberal government of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

A new report from the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition shows the devastating scale of the program: Canada has euthanized 90,000 people since 2016.

However, some are still hopeful that the Liberal government’s eugenics agenda can be turned around.

Last week, a Conservative MP’s private member’s bill, which would ban individuals with mental illness from being euthanized, received full support from the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.

The revelations point to an alarming reality that Canada’s euthanasia system is no longer confined to edge-case medical situations.

Instead, it is increasingly becoming a state-endorsed “solution” for vulnerable citizens, including those who once served their country.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/bombshell-testimony-exposes-canadian-governments-push-euthanize-veterans/

And,

READ MORE – Canada’s Euthanasia Deaths Surge to Record Highs, Data Shows

A church leader in the UK says police warned him that he may face a criminal investigation because a Bible verse displayed on the back of his campervan could be treated as “hate speech.”

The story is yet another chilling example of how far Britain’s crackdown on religious expression has gone.

Pastor Mick Fleming, 59, who runs an independent church and anti-poverty charity in Burnley, said he was approached by a police officer at a gas station on October 27.

The officer warned Fleming that the Scripture on his vehicle might be considered hateful “in the wrong context.”

The verse was John 3:16, one of the most widely known and quoted passages in the Christian faith:

“For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life.”

According to Fleming, the officer tapped him on the shoulder and quietly issued the warning.

“He was a really nice guy, wasn’t nasty or anything, and he said ‘a bit of advice – the writing could be seen as hate speech in the wrong context. I am just giving you a heads up,’” Fleming said.

The officer allegedly cautioned him that if anyone complained, police would “investigate” and he “could end up in trouble.”

Fleming said the exchange left him stunned.

“I just thought ‘wow’ – I just wondered what people thought … where have we moved to as a country where a bit of Christian scripture on the back of a van can be seen as hateful or spiteful?”

He added:

“Maybe society is moving to a place where they don’t want faith-based people sat around a table in discussion with them … for me it’s an integral message of how real change is possible.”

Fleming, who now lives in the van after giving up his belongings, posted a video describing the encounter and asked viewers for their thoughts.

He says he refuses to remove the verse.

“I’m not going to change it,” he said, insisting the Scripture is not “spiteful or hateful.”

Online commenters overwhelmingly defended him.

One wrote:

“There’s nothing wrong with the sign, it’s all positive, so I don’t get why it’s a problem.

“It’s not offensive in the slightest.”

Another added:

“Hate speech? It’s the complete opposite. It’s love speech.

“In fact, even the word love sells God’s feelings for us so short.”

A Pastor Once Caught in Crime, Now Targeted for His Faith

Fleming’s story from drug dealer and armed “fixer” to pastor serving the homeless is well known in the UK.

He has been featured on the TV show Songs of Praise, and even praised by the Prince of Wales, who said he was “deeply moved” by his work.

Fleming says his transformation began in 2009 when he believed he was visited by an angel, leading him to abandon his criminal life.

Concerns Grow Over Misuse of Hate Speech Law

Lancashire Police claim they have no record of the encounter and stated:

“We would not consider this to be hate speech and would ask the person in question to speak to us directly so that we could look into the matter.”

But free speech campaigners note that police have repeatedly misused hate speech laws to target Christians.

President Donald Trump’s administration even raised alarms in August, warning that Britain was engaged in a broad clampdown on expression, citing “credible reports of serious restrictions on freedom of expression.”

A Bible Verse as a Crime?

Under UK law, displaying Bible verses publicly is typically lawful.

However, authorities have the power to pursue charges if they believe wording could be interpreted as “threatening” or intended to “stir up hatred.”

That discretion has increasingly put ordinary religious individuals in the crosshairs.

Fleming says the entire incident reflects a darker shift.

A country once rooted in free expression and Christian tradition is now warning pastors that Scripture, even the Gospel’s central message, could be a criminal offense.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/uk-police-warn-pastor-investigated-hate-speech-over-bible-verse-camper/

And,

READ MORE – UK Government: First Amendment Doesn’t Protect Americans from British Censorship Laws

Canada’s federal government is quietly moving forward with a national digital ID system, slipping the plan into the depths of its 2025 budget where almost no one would notice.

On page 490 of the massive document, the Liberal Party government proposes to “modernize legislative authorities to support information sharing and digital services” within the Department of Employment and Social Development.

However, the bland language masks a sweeping shift toward centralized digital identification.

The plan begins with a seemingly limited pilot: digital IDs for people applying for Employment Insurance and Old Age Security.

But the budget makes clear the ultimate goal is a fully integrated identity system linking multiple benefit programs under a single government-controlled profile.

“This modernization would benefit all Canadians,” the budget claims.

It continues by promising “efficient and convenient government services” and supposedly helping “seniors, newcomers, persons with disabilities, and rural residents.”

But critics note the pattern and warn that governments always pitch digital ID as “convenience,” only for it to expand into a universal surveillance and control tool once the infrastructure is built.

A Slow Creep Toward a Unified, Centralized ID

The federal bureaucracy has floated digital ID schemes before, only to retreat when public backlash erupted over privacy fears.

This time, the rollout is quieter. Narrower.

It’s framed as “modernizing benefits delivery” instead of erecting a national ID regime.

But behind the scenes, the architecture is already taking shape.

In 2024, Employment and Social Development Canada hired private consultants to explore merging its fragmented benefit systems.

Their conclusion was to mandate integration through a single digital identity, serving as a master key granting access to multiple programs, eliminating paperwork, and centralizing personal data in one place.

The department says the goal is “more integrated and efficient services across government.”

In practice, it means creating the largest single repository of citizens’ most sensitive data.

Massive Privacy Risks, Minimal Transparency

Digital identity systems consolidate everything, such as banking details, biometric data, health records, and government history, into a single target.

One breach exposes everything, and the centralized gatekeepers have control over all of it.

Canada’s own privacy commissioner warned in 2024 that public trust in data protection is collapsing, citing “limited trust” and deep concern about how institutions handle personal information.

The report also highlighted the rise of “state-sanctioned” data breaches, a stark reminder that foreign actors, and even governments themselves, see digital ID as a goldmine.

Yet the government insists participation will remain voluntary and that traditional services, whether they’re in-person, mail, or phone, will continue.

But history shows “voluntary” digital systems eventually become impossible to opt out of as analog options are phased out.

Even the budget admits major obstacles: “Digital literacy gaps among seniors,” “connectivity issues,” and “language barriers” for newcomers.

But these warnings haven’t slowed the rollout.

A Global Push Toward Government-Backed Digital Identity

Canada is not alone.

The move comes as governments worldwide are steering citizens toward centralized identification:

  • UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has revived Britain’s digital ID plans.

  • Australia’s 2024 Digital ID Bill advances a nationwide identity system.

  • The EU’s Digital Identity Wallet aims to link credentials across borders.

Each initiative is framed as modernization.

Each expands state access to personal information.

And each follows an eerily similar script: convenience first, surveillance potential later.

A Major Shift Hidden In Plain Sight

Whether Canada’s proposal becomes the foundation of a national digital ID will depend on how far the government pushes “information sharing” and “integration.”

For now, the changes are buried quietly in the budget, but the direction is unmistakable.

A slow, steady transformation is underway, redefining how Canadians interact with their government, how their identities are authenticated, and how much control the state has over access to everyday services.

And once a digital ID system is built, history shows it rarely stops at “convenience.”

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-government-quietly-advances-plan-national-digital-id/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Man Devastated After Government Euthanizes Both Grandmothers

President Donald Trump is threatening a $1 billion lawsuit against the BBC, accusing the British state broadcaster of publishing “false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements” in a Panorama documentary that deceptively edited key portions of his January 6, 2021, speech.

Trump’s litigation counsel sent a formal notice on Sunday to BBC Chair Samir Shah and general counsel Sarah Jones.

The White House is giving the network until Friday to retract the statements or face legal action.

The letter argues the BBC’s documentary, “Trump: A Second Chance,” intentionally misled viewers by removing Trump’s call for supporters to protest “peacefully and patriotically.”

Portions of the speech were spliced together to make it appear as though Trump was calling on his supporters to turn violent.

The report also added additional sounds to make the crowd appear aggressive.

The controversy has already triggered upheaval inside the BBC: Director-General Tim Davie and BBC News and Current Affairs chief Deborah Turness both stepped down in recent days after intense criticism over the documentary.

BBC Fabricated Content to Influence the 2024 Election

Trump’s attorneys say the Panorama episode spliced together unrelated segments of his Jan. 6 remarks to imply he incited violence, an omission critics say completely reversed the meaning of his speech.

According to Trump’s legal team, the BBC broadcast Trump saying:

“We’re gonna walk down to the Capitol, and I’ll be there with you, and we fight.

“We fight like hell, and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”

But Trump actually told supporters:

“We’re going to walk down, and I’ll be there with you.

“We’re going to walk down, we’re going to walk down any one of you but I think right here, we’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women.”

It further states the BBC edited out a crucial line:

“I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”

Attorney Alejandro Brito wrote that the BBC’s actions constituted defamation under Florida law, arguing that the edited statements “were fabricated and aired by the BBC” and have been “widely disseminated,” causing “overwhelming financial and reputational harm.”

The deceptively edited clips spread widely across social media, fueling anti-Trump sentiment on a global level.

Legal Team: BBC Acted With “Actual Malice”

Trump’s counsel says the BBC has “no viable defense” and displayed “reckless disregard for the truth,” adding:

“Failure to comply will leave President Trump with no choice but to pursue any and all legal rights and remedies available to recover damages… with all rights and remedies being expressly reserved.”

The letter demands a full and prominent retraction, an apology, and compensation, and orders the BBC to preserve all documents related to the documentary.

A BBC spokesperson responded cautiously:

“We will review the letter and respond directly in due course.”

BBC Crisis Deepens After Whistleblower Exposé

The fallout comes after The Telegraph published excerpts from internal documents written by communications adviser Michael Prescott, who was hired to review BBC editorial standards.

The materials sharply criticized the broadcaster’s handling of the Trump documentary, reporting on transgender issues, and accusations of anti-Israel bias in its Arabic service.

Turness cited the mounting controversy when she resigned, saying it “has reached a stage where it is causing damage to the BBC,” adding, “the buck stops with me.”

BBC Tried to “Step on the Scales” of an American Election

Trump reacted Sunday after the executives’ departures, writing on Truth Social:

“The TOP people in the BBC, including TIM DAVIE, the BOSS, are all quitting/FIRED, because they were caught ‘doctoring’ my very good (PERFECT!) speech of January 6th.”

He thanked The Telegraph for exposing the edits, calling the BBC employees “Corrupt ‘Journalists’” and warning that they tried to interfere in a U.S. presidential election, “on top of everything else,” from “a Foreign Country” considered a key U.S. ally.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has also blasted the BBC as “100% fake news” and a “propaganda machine,” telling The Telegraph:

“This purposefully dishonest, selectively edited clip by the BBC is further evidence that they are total, 100% fake news that should no longer be worth the time on the television screens of the great people of the United Kingdom.”

Final Notice: $1 Billion Lawsuit If BBC Doesn’t Comply by Nov. 14

Trump’s legal team concluded their letter with a deadline:

“If the BBC does not comply… by November 14, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. EST, President Trump will be left with no alternative but to… file legal action for no less than $1,000,000,000 (One Billion Dollars) in damages.

“The BBC is on notice.”

The BBC, already destabilized by resignations and internal criticism, now faces a potential legal battle with the president of the United States, one that could have enormous financial and reputational stakes.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/trump-gives-bbc-ultimatum-apologize-false-defamatory-reporting-face-1-billion-lawsuit/

And,

READ MORE – Federal Judge Quits with Anti-Trump Meltdown, Rages Over ‘Angry Attacks on the Courts’