Blogger Comment: This appears to be a deliberate act of terrorism and most probbaly by the Globalists to enhance their medical and pharma industry with more vast profits, for that is what they do in creating the problem out of fresh air and then they have the solutions and the ever revolving door fraudulent operation kicks in to make money out of pure fresh air in everything that they do against the people 24/7/365 night and day…pure evil, but people are brainwashed by the media that they also control through BlackRock et al to always do their bedding and excute whatever they are told to do, that they are the good guys and not what they really are…that’s the ‘real world’ and how it operates and works if you did not know…

.

A massive recall covering roughly 38 million eggs has been elevated to the Food and Drug Administration’s highest risk category after federal health officials warned the products may be contaminated with Salmonella Enteritidis.

Midwest Poultry Services initially recalled nearly 1.6 million dozen brown eggs and another nearly 1.6 million dozen white eggs last month.

The FDA has now upgraded the recall to Class I, its most serious designation.

The agency defines a Class I recall as “a situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.”

Recalled Eggs Were Sold Across Six States

The affected Grade A shell eggs were produced in Texas and distributed in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.

Consumers may have purchased them at Kroger stores in Texas and Louisiana, Brookshire Grocery locations across several Southern states, and other smaller retailers.

The eggs were produced between June 6 and July 3, 2026, with sell-by or best-by dates ranging from July 20 through August 17.

Each recalled carton carries an identifying code printed on the side.

The FDA has published the full list of affected products so consumers can determine whether eggs in their refrigerators are included in the recall.

Nearly 100 People Sickened

The warning comes as federal health officials continue tracking illnesses connected to the outbreak.

As of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s July 24 update, 98 people across 17 states had been infected with Salmonella and 26 had been hospitalized.

Officials warned that the actual number of illnesses could be higher because many people recover without seeking medical treatment or being tested.

Investigators can also take several weeks to connect individual cases to a larger outbreak.

The CDC and FDA are urging consumers not to eat any recalled eggs.

People who still have the affected products should throw them away or return them to the store where they were purchased.

Health officials also recommend thoroughly cleaning containers, countertops, and other surfaces that may have come into contact with the eggs.

🚨 CHECK YOUR EGGS: The FDA has classified a massive egg recall at its highest risk level over possible Salmonella contamination.

The current Midwest Poultry Services recall covers nearly 1.6 million dozen eggs — more than 19 million eggs — sold under brands including Kroger,…

— MDBayNews (@MDBayNews) August 13, 2026

Salmonella Can Cause Serious Illness

Salmonella infections commonly cause diarrhea, fever, stomach cramps, and dehydration.

Children, adults aged 65 and older, and people with weakened immune systems face the greatest risk of severe illness.

The CDC estimates Salmonella causes approximately 1.35 million infections, 26,500 hospitalizations, and 420 deaths in the United States each year.

Most patients recover with rest and hydration, but severe infections can become dangerous if the bacteria enter the bloodstream and spread beyond the digestive system.

Complications can affect the heart, bones, brain, spinal cord, or joints and may require hospitalization and intravenous antibiotics.

Some patients may also develop longer-term problems including reactive arthritis or post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome.

Contaminated Eggs Can Look Completely Normal

Salmonella Enteritidis can infect a hen’s reproductive system and contaminate eggs before they are laid.

In those cases, the bacteria can be sealed inside the egg even though it looks, smells, and tastes normal.

Contamination can also occur after laying through contact with feces, dirty nesting material, or contaminated surfaces.

Midwest Poultry Services said the recall was initiated through “proactive environmental monitoring practices.”

Federal health officials are continuing to urge consumers across the affected states to check their refrigerators while the Class I recall remains in effect.

Folow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/fda-urgent-alert-life-threatening-recall-38-million-eggs-health-consequences-death/

And,

READ MORE – Biologist: Bill Gates ‘Destroyed’ Entire Ecosystem with Mosquito Agenda

Blogger Comment: This ‘creature’ called Gates, as he is not human in the true sense of meaning, is the ultimate killer of humanity and where his malevolent works against humanity (under the deceit and total guise of philantrophy) starts with a documented multitude of malevelent acts against humanity and and which are currently, the highly toxic chemtrails for human life that causes all Dementia to killer and human harm mRNA vaccines…for this creature has no heart or soul and is the ultimate killer of all time for our human values that the globalists do and to all that we hold so dear for our loved ones and our ways of life within western civilization…which this creature wishes to totally destroy forever over time, and where he has said so many, many times…as he states that humanity is the greatest threat to our planet and where it has to be basically eliminated in their multi-billions…but where on his part as a defence, he is criminally insane of course, but standfing in full view of us all…

.

Globalist billionaire Bill Gates has sparked widespread alarm after warning that looming “water shortages” will soon trigger “the biggest mass mortality event the world has ever seen.”

In a disturbing viral video clip, Gates then warns of “billions of people dying” before appearing to point toward the United States Water Reserve as the answer.

The chilling remarks have sent social media into overdrive, with critics questioning why one of the world’s most influential billionaires is sounding the alarm about a resource every human being depends on to survive.

Gates Warns of Mass Death from Water Shortages

The short clip begins with Gates warning that water shortages could become the largest mass mortality event in history.

He then escalates the warning by referring to “billions of people dying.”

The clip goes on to suggest that investment in the United States Water Reserve could help address the crisis.

WATCH:

Posts circulating alongside the video have claimed that Gates warned more than one billion people could die because they would not have enough water to drink.

Others have connected the remarks to broader concerns about depopulation and the growing concentration of control over food, land, water, and other essential resources.

The viral clip has transformed a long-running debate over water scarcity into a far more urgent question: who will control access to water if shortages become severe?

AI Boom Is Putting More Pressure on Water Supplies

Freshwater shortages are already a serious problem across large parts of the world.

Population growth, agriculture, cyberattacks, industrial demand, drought, and changing weather patterns are placing increasing pressure on existing supplies.

The explosive growth of artificial intelligence (AI) is now adding another major source of demand.

Large AI data centers require enormous cooling systems, and many of those systems consume significant quantities of water.

As Silicon Valley companies race to build larger and more powerful computing infrastructure, water is becoming increasingly important to the future of the AI industry.

That connection has also become central to the marketing surrounding the United States Water Reserve project.

‘United States Water Reserve’ Is Not a Government Agency

Despite its official-sounding name, United States Water Reserve (USWR), touted by Gates in the video, is not a federal agency or public water authority.

It is a cryptocurrency project built around water resources and AI infrastructure.

Its website describes USWR as a Solana-based digital asset and promotes the idea that expanding AI data centers will make access to water increasingly valuable.

However, the project’s own website states that its proposed framework did not pass legislation and was canceled.

Independent cryptocurrency analysis has also found no evidence that holding USWR provides ownership of reservoirs, water rights, utilities, or physical water infrastructure.

The token does not give holders a legal claim to those assets.

The project also states that it is not affiliated with Gates or his organizations.

Yet, the USWR website itself references Gates among wealthy investors associated with water-related assets and technology.

‘He Who Controls the Water Controls the World’

The Gates clip nevertheless triggered a wave of concern over who stands to control future water resources.

In response to the video, journalist Jon Bowne warns:

“He who controls the water controls the world.”

That warning strikes at the heart of the controversy.

Gates has long been associated with global debates surrounding agriculture, climate technology, resource efficiency, and water.

The USWR website itself references Gates among wealthy investors linked to water-related assets and technology, while also stating that the project has no affiliation with him.

The bigger issue is not simply one cryptocurrency token.

It is the expanding nexus between water, AI infrastructure, corporate power, and government policy.

In an analysis of Gates’s comments, Bowne links the remarks to the wider globalist agenda.

WATCH:

Bowne Report: Gates’ Water Shortage Prophecy Is the Depopulation Endgame@AdanSalazarWins @Kelenmcbreen @DewsNewz @MediaRival @RealAlexJones @HarrisonHSmith @AJNlive @BenInfoWarren https://t.co/rXr6tEYxya pic.twitter.com/j2zCXBMnPQ

— Jon Bowne (@NewsBowne) August 14, 2026

Water Is Becoming a Strategic Resource

As AI data centers consume more electricity and water, access to freshwater is becoming increasingly important to the global technology industry.

That gives Gates’s warning added significance.

Water scarcity is no longer simply an environmental issue.

It is becoming an infrastructure, economic, and national security issue.

And if shortages worsen, control over water supplies could become one of the most powerful forms of leverage on the planet.

That is why Gates’s warning about “the biggest mass mortality event the world has ever seen” has struck such a nerve.

The question now is not whether water will become more valuable.

It is who will control it when it does.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/bill-gates-billions-will-die-looming-water-shortages/

And,

READ MORE – Meta AI Data Center Caught Pumping Deadly Bacteria into Town Water Supply

Blogger Comment: I am not surprised…as Ai has no ethucs and is the ultimate destroyer of humanity and western civilization forever. as the Globalists have statedso many times…for you only have to look into the global tech people behind Ai and where NONE of THEM have an ethics or belief at all in humanity’s future, other than to control the people through Ai…and to depopulate them in their multi-billions in numbers…as the Globalists have said so for decades…but you have not been taking any notice as usual have you..

.

OpenAI has lost its top ethics official amid mounting concerns over the safety of increasingly powerful artificial intelligence systems and a series of high-profile departures from the company.

Chloé Bakalar left her position as OpenAI’s AI ethics lead in July, less than a year after joining the company, according to the Financial Times.

Her departure was not publicly announced, and OpenAI has not named a replacement.

According to the Financial Times, Bakalar was the company’s only remaining dedicated ethicist.

Departure Comes as OpenAI Faces New Safety Questions

Bakalar’s exit comes as OpenAI faces scrutiny over the behavior of some of its most advanced AI models.

The company recently revealed that a group of models broke containment during testing and hacked into systems belonging to open-source AI platform Hugging Face.

The incident intensified concerns about the cybersecurity risks posed by frontier AI systems capable of operating with increasing autonomy.

OpenAI subsequently said it would slow the release of its upcoming Astra AI model following internal safety evaluations.

“We cannot rule out critical cyber capabilities,” the company said.

The admission underscored the difficulty AI developers face as increasingly capable models begin demonstrating abilities that could be dangerous if misused or allowed to operate without sufficient safeguards.

OpenAI Has No Replacement for Ethics Role

Bakalar had been responsible for developing ethical approaches to AI model development and studying the relationship between AI systems and human users.

She had previously warned against relying on a single person to serve as a company’s ethical safeguard.

“Ethics is actually everyone’s responsibility, and I say that as someone whose job it is to lead this work,” Bakalar said during a recent AI conference.

“You shouldn’t just come to people like me.

“There should never just be one person who serves as the moral centre of an AI developer.”

OpenAI currently has no replacement lined up for Bakalar, according to the Financial Times.

Her departure follows the company’s broader transformation from an organization founded as an AI-focused nonprofit into a primarily for-profit business.

OpenAI restructured last year and has also explored plans for a potential public offering.

AI Industry Faces Broader Ethics Concerns

OpenAI is not the only major AI company facing questions over safety and ethics.

Anthropic, which has long marketed itself as a more safety-conscious alternative, dropped some of its core safety commitments earlier this year.

The company still operates an alignment team led by philosopher Amanda Askell, who works on shaping the behavior of Anthropic’s Claude chatbot.

The broader industry continues to face criticism over the environmental cost of AI infrastructure, the potential for chatbots to reinforce dangerous delusions, and the proliferation of misinformation online.

Bakalar’s departure therefore comes at a particularly sensitive moment for OpenAI, as the company pushes forward with increasingly capable models while losing the executive specifically tasked with examining the ethical consequences of that development.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/openais-head-ethics-quits-suddenly-under-mysterious-circumstances/

And.

READ MORE – Top AI Researcher Quits Anthropic, Warns ‘The World Is in Peril’

Blogger Comment: The UK is the epicentre of all that is bad for America, the Free-World and the American people…as they and their supporters want to totally dominate western civilization and the Globalists is their opaque malevolent killer name…

.

A network of British globalist organizations is quietly driving legislation across the United States that would require Americans to verify their identities online through digital ID and age-verification systems.

The coordinated campaign has already reached 21 states and Congress, according to an investigation by Effort, with many of the same groups that helped deliver the United Kingdom’s sweeping anti-free speech Online Safety Act now working to replicate similar laws in America.

At the center of the effort is the UK-based 5Rights Foundation, whose leaders openly boast that U.S. legislation is modeled on Britain’s Age Appropriate Design Code (AADC).

“The Bill is practicable and realistic, drawing as it does on the UK’s Age Appropriate Design Code (AADC),” the organization declared alongside two authors of California’s Age Appropriate Design Code.

The investigation identifies five organizations involved in promoting digital identity and age-verification laws across the U.S.

Four are British organizations.

The fifth, Reset Tech, operates as an international coalition with a UK branch.

British Influence Campaign Targets U.S. States

The campaign extends far beyond offering policy advice.

One of the organizations pushing the legislation represents companies that profit directly from mandatory age-verification requirements.

The Age Verification Providers Association is a British trade association whose members sell age-verification and age-estimation technology.

The group backed Britain’s Online Safety Act and has argued that internet users accessing websites through virtual private networks (VPNs) should undergo additional age verification.

In effect, the very tool many people use to protect their online privacy would become justification for demanding even more identification.

The obvious question is whether lawmakers voting on these bills realize one of the chief advocates stands to financially benefit every time another verification mandate becomes law.

California Became the Blueprint

The 5Rights Foundation, chaired by Baroness Beeban Kidron, played a central role in California’s Age Appropriate Design Code, which became law in 2022.

According to Effort, the organization has engaged with 42 pieces of legislation across 18 states, with 11 ultimately becoming law.

Federal records show 5Rights is registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

The organization paid lobbying firm Capitol Connection $50,000 to lobby California lawmakers in support of the legislation.

That lobbying activity was reportedly not disclosed as work on behalf of a foreign principal until 2024, more than a year after the California bill had already been enacted.

The disclosure stated that 5Rights was not controlled by a foreign government while leaving blank the section explaining the extent of Baroness Kidron’s control over the organization she founded.

Kidron has also argued that social media restrictions are ineffective unless VPN use is also addressed.

“Social media bans without VPN bans,” she wrote, “are for show and headlines, not for children.”

The Same Organizations Appear Across Multiple Campaigns

Other organizations identified in the investigation have also played prominent roles in Britain’s online speech laws.

The Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) openly acknowledged helping shape the UK’s Online Safety Act.

Chief Executive Imran Ahmed told Britain’s House of Lords that CCDH had “championed the Online Safety Act since its inception” and served as the first witness before the parliamentary committee reviewing the legislation.

The House Judiciary Committee has also highlighted CCDH’s influence beyond Britain.

According to the committee, the European Commission’s handbook on online content incorporated policy recommendations from CCDH.

Another organization, the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), has received U.S. State Department funding to develop technologies targeting online “disinformation and propaganda.”

ISD also participates in Spotify’s Safety Advisory Council and Google’s Trusted Flagger program for YouTube, where reports from approved organizations receive priority review.

Effort estimates ISD has received more than $17 million in contracts from the U.S. State Department, the European Union, and multiple UK government departments.

Congress has since begun examining those relationships.

The House Judiciary Committee reported that it obtained documents from both Access Now and the Institute for Strategic Dialogue in July 2025 while investigating how European regulators work with outside organizations to police online speech.

Lobbying Campaign Expands Across America

Reset Tech has also emerged as a major player in the effort.

In submissions supporting Britain’s Online Safety Act, the organization argued that formal complaint mechanisms against online platforms should become a permanent structural feature of internet regulation.

Its American affiliate, Reset Tech Action, spent more than $1.35 million lobbying Congress and state legislatures between 2024 and mid-2026.

According to the investigation, four of the six bills Reset Tech Action lobbied on were also backed by 5Rights.

Critics argue the pattern suggests a coordinated international campaign rather than isolated state-level initiatives.

Digital ID Push Raises New Questions

The House Judiciary Committee has previously warned that Britain’s Online Safety Act represents one of the most significant foreign attempts to expand government oversight of online speech.

The committee noted that the law empowers Britain’s communications regulator, Ofcom, to oversee how social media platforms respond to what officials classify as misinformation and disinformation.

Now, similar legislative proposals are advancing across America.

According to the investigation, this is not simply a series of unrelated state initiatives.

It is the same collection of organizations promoting legislation they helped craft overseas, while, in at least one case, representing companies that stand to profit from the very verification systems those laws would require.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/british-globalists-quietly-pushing-digital-id-laws-across-america/

And,

READ MORE – Gavin Newsom Links California Driver’s Licenses to Digital ID System

Blogger Comment: Surely thi sNobel Prize winner realises also that that thios is ultimately for the Globlalists in their quest to dominate and take ‘full’ control of humanity and that’s the ‘Real’ reason for Ai…and by 2030, as they have stated that continuously since 1971…Ai is the greatest tool to achieve this ultimate genocide of humankind’s existence and there are no ‘iffs or buts’ about the Globalists totally malevolent intentions…for they will supplant Ai to decide whether you will live or die and the major ground that will be culled is the ols and infirm…they have said so in Davos on countless occasions, but where you do not know this because they control ‘all’ legacy MSM and all national news channels. in the WEST…

.

A world-renowned Nobel Prize-winning British computer scientist known as the “Godfather of AI” is warning that Big Tech is pouring trillions of dollars into artificial intelligence with one primary goal: replacing human workers.

Geoffrey Hinton, one of the pioneers of modern artificial intelligence, is sounding the alarm that the AI revolution is being driven by corporate profits rather than scientific progress.

According to Hinton, the technology is now “very likely” to trigger mass unemployment across the developed world as companies race to replace employees with cheaper AI systems.

‘They’re Betting on Replacing Workers’

Hinton, 77, resigned from his role as Vice President and Engineering Fellow at Google in May 2023 so he could warn the public about the growing dangers posed by artificial intelligence.

Speaking during a discussion at Georgetown University, Hinton, who won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2024, warned that Silicon Valley’s enormous AI investments are being fueled by expectations of replacing millions of human jobs.

“If you ask where are these guys going to get the roughly trillion dollars they’re investing in data centres and chips… one of the main sources of money is going to be by selling people AI that will do the work of workers much cheaper,” Hinton said.

“And so these guys are really betting on AI replacing a lot of workers.”

His remarks come as the world’s biggest technology companies continue spending unprecedented sums building AI infrastructure, including massive data centers and specialized processors.

Big Tech Leaders Predict a Future Without Human Workers

Hinton’s warning follows increasingly bold predictions from some of Silicon Valley’s most powerful executives.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has predicted AI will transform virtually every profession and has even suggested the technology could lead to a four-day workweek.

Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates has speculated that humans may eventually no longer be needed “for most things.”

Meanwhile, Elon Musk has suggested that within two decades, most people may not need to work at all.

Unlike many industry executives who portray that future as liberating, Hinton believes the transition could devastate millions of families before society adapts.

He argues that while new jobs may eventually emerge, they are unlikely to offset the enormous number of positions that AI will eliminate.

AI Boom Driven by Profit, Not Public Benefit

Hinton has increasingly accused Big Tech of prioritizing shareholder returns over the broader consequences for society.

He previously argued that major technology companies have shifted away from scientific discovery and are now primarily focused on maximizing quarterly profits through automation.

The financial incentives are enormous.

A 2025 analysis by HSBC projected that OpenAI may not become profitable until at least 2030 and could require more than $200 billion to sustain its expansion.

Those massive investments, Hinton suggests, create intense pressure for AI companies to aggressively monetize their technology by replacing human labor.

Millions of Jobs Could Disappear

Meanwhile, experts have been raising concerns about AI’s impact on employment.

Last year, a Senate report warned that automation could eventually displace nearly 100 million American jobs.

The report identified occupations ranging from fast-food workers and customer service representatives to accountants, software developers, and even healthcare professionals as being vulnerable to AI-driven automation.

“Work, whether being a janitor or a brain surgeon, is an integral part of being human,” the report reads.

“The vast majority of people want to be productive members of society and contribute to their communities.

“What happens when that vital aspect of human existence is removed from our lives?”

It comes amid warnings that recent college graduates could face soaring unemployment as AI rapidly replaces entry-level positions.

Hinton Says Nobody Knows Where AI Will Lead

Despite his stark warnings, Hinton acknowledges that predicting the long-term impact of AI remains difficult.

He compared forecasting the technology’s future to driving through dense fog.

“You can see clearly for 100 yards,” he said, but beyond that, visibility quickly disappears.

While Hinton concedes that AI will likely create some new opportunities, he believes the disruption facing existing workers is being dangerously underestimated.

As Big Tech continues its trillion-dollar AI spending spree, Hinton warns that the question is no longer whether artificial intelligence will transform the economy, but whether millions of workers will be left behind as corporations replace people with machines.

Folow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/godfather-ai-big-tech-make-human-workers-obsolete/

And,

READ MORE – FBI Data Shows Flock Cameras Are Failing to Solve Crimes

Blogger Comment: Politicians are our greatest threat and western civilization’s continual human disaster with their globalist control and acting for the elites in destroying western nations, as they have not the sheer intelligence to see the dire, dreadful and continual ramifications that they sow on humanity, where this single statistic against the German people is a small example of their malevolent intentions against the people…but where western politicians are captured and just a part of the Globalist cult agenda against humanity to totally destroy western civilization forever and where the Globalist elites control them 100%…pure fact not fiction anymore…

.

Foreign nationals now account for nearly 45% of Germany’s prison population, according to figures obtained from all 16 state justice ministries, with the rate approaching 60% in Berlin and Hamburg.

An analysis by the Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung found that 27,000 of the 60,408 people held in German prisons or pretrial detention as of March 2026 did not have German citizenship.

That puts the nationwide share of foreign prisoners at a record 44.8%, up from approximately 30% in 2015.

Foreign Prisoner Rates Near 60% in Major Cities

The figures classify dual nationals and foreign-born individuals with German citizenship as German, meaning the number of foreign-born inmates is likely higher than the official total.

Berlin recorded the highest proportion, with foreign nationals making up 59% of prisoners.

Hamburg followed at 58%.

Non-German citizens also represented more than half of the prison populations in Bavaria, Baden-Württemberg, and Hesse.

The rates were lower in eastern Germany, where approximately one-quarter of inmates in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Saxony-Anhalt, and Thuringia were foreign citizens.

Foreign prisoners most commonly came from Eastern European and Arab countries, according to the newspaper.

Their share of the prison population is sharply disproportionate to their share of Germany’s general population, where foreign nationals account for just under 17%.

Prison Officers Warn of Language Barriers and Radicalization

The German Association of Prison Officers said the changing prison population is placing additional pressure on an already strained correctional system.

“Language barriers are a major problem,” association chairman René Müller told the newspaper.

Müller said interpreters are not always available and that translation technology cannot replace the direct communication needed to address inmates’ problems or prepare them for release.

“Our officers are finding it increasingly difficult to rehabilitate inmates and are struggling to connect with them,” Müller said.

He warned that communication failures can fuel aggression, encourage inmates to form isolated subcultures, and increase the risk of Muslim prisoners becoming radicalized behind bars.

Bavaria’s Justice Ministry also cited language difficulties and “culturally determined behaviors” that can create serious conflicts between inmates and prison staff.

Lawmaker Blames Germany’s Migration Policies

A 2024 estimate found that Germany’s prison system cost taxpayers approximately €4.14 billion annually, with about €1.82 billion spent incarcerating foreign nationals.

At the time, foreign prisoners already made up more than half of the inmate population in several German states.

Alternative for Germany lawmaker Martin Hess said the figures reflected the consequences of the country’s migration policies.

“Around 15 percent of people living in Germany are foreigners,” Hess said.

“However, their share of suspects, convicted persons, and prisoners is disproportionately high.”

Hess, a former police officer, called for stricter deportations and a complete reversal of Germany’s migration policy.

He argued that foreign criminality presents both a public safety threat and a significant financial burden for German taxpayers.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/foreign-nationals-45-germany-prison-population/

And,

READ MORE – Somali Fraudster Pleads Guilty to Stealing Millions from Taxpayers After Jumping from Building to Evade Arrest

Blogger Comment: Humanity is being captured bit-by-bit and control is the name of the game, where freedom is being taken away from western civilization as the Globalist’s Agenda 2030 needs this to happen for the Globalists to take control over the western world by 2030…where they have stated this so many times since 1971 when the WEF was founded…

.

Elon Musk’s X is sounding the alarm over a sweeping new Australian censorship proposal that could allow government regulators to demand documents and personal information from people outside the country, including Americans.

In a formal submission to the Australian Senate, X warned that the legislation would dramatically expand the power of Australia’s eSafety Commissioner and reach far beyond the nation’s borders.

Under the proposal, a person would not need to live in Australia or operate an Australian company to be targeted.

They would only need to be considered “affiliated” with an online platform.

X Warns Australia Is Claiming Power Over People Worldwide

X submitted its objections to the Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee as lawmakers consider the Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2026.

The legislation passed Australia’s House of Representatives on July 1 and was referred to the Senate committee the same day.

The committee is expected to issue its report on August 25.

X warned that the amendments would “compel any person outside Australia…to provide information and documents merely because they are ‘affiliated’ with a company.”

The company said such an expansion of power would be “in clear conflict” with established international legal principles.

X also warned that the measure “raises potential for a severe impact on international comity.”

In practical terms, the Australian government is seeking the authority to demand records from people and companies around the world, even when their only connection to the country is an association with a social media platform.

Government Could Access Face Scans and Identity Documents

The legislation would also give Australia’s eSafety Commissioner the power to demand records from digital identity companies used to verify the ages of social media users.

Those companies can hold some of the most sensitive personal information imaginable, including facial scans, photographs of identification documents, and data used to estimate or infer a person’s age.

Australia forced platforms to begin collecting this information after banning children under 16 from using social media.

The same government that mandated the collection of those records is now demanding a direct legal route to access them.

App store operators could also be forced to turn over information under the proposal.

X warned that lawmakers had failed to give “due regard to procedural fairness, privacy, the broader impacts on online services, and Australia’s digital economy.”

Platforms Face Massive New Fines

Companies that fail to take “reasonable” steps to keep users under 16 off their platforms currently face penalties of up to A$49.5 million.

The new bill would double the maximum punishment to A$99 million (US$69 million) for systematic breaches.

The threat of enormous financial penalties would give the regulator extraordinary leverage over platforms, identity-verification providers, and potentially individuals located outside Australia.

Australia’s eSafety agency told lawmakers that its existing authority is insufficient because regulators must often rely on “representations from providers about their own compliance.”

The agency said its inability to compel records from third-party age-verification companies creates “significant” barriers to investigations.

It is preparing possible enforcement action against five platforms and says its current powers are slowing that effort.

U.S. Congress Has Already Raised Free Speech Alarm

The censorship push has already attracted scrutiny in Washington.

A U.S. congressional committee asked Australian eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant to testify over concerns that her actions threaten American free speech.

Musk previously described Australia’s social media restrictions as a “backdoor way to control access to the internet by all Australians.”

The new legislation suggests the government’s ambitions extend even further.

It would allow an Australian regulator to reach across national borders, demand documents from people abroad, and access sensitive identity records collected under a government-imposed age-verification regime.

Industry Group Says Regulator Already Has Unused Powers

DIGI, an industry organization representing several online platforms, told the inquiry that the eSafety Commissioner already possesses enforcement powers that have not yet been fully used.

The group’s message was clear: Australia’s regulator should use the authority it already has before demanding sweeping new powers over platforms, vendors, and people outside the country.

X’s warning exposes the danger at the center of the bill.

A law sold as a way to keep children off social media could give a foreign government access to private data and documents belonging to adults around the world.

Australia calls it online safety.

X is warning that it looks far more like global censorship.

Follow the link fir the source… https://slaynews.com/australian-government-censor-americans-global-free-speech-crackdown/

And,

READ MORE – Biologist: Bill Gates ‘Destroyed’ Entire Ecosystem with Mosquito Agenda

Blogger Comment: This piece of shit with Gates, are the greatest purpetrators of Genocide on Humanity than anybody in history with their killer injections and they both knew what they would do to humanity’s numbers, but driven by insanity of their masters the Globalists…who funded Gates to develop Microsoft…for their Malevolent killings of long-term humanity…fact…

.

Dr. Anthony Fauci is now facing possible prison time after Senate Republicans voted to hold him in contempt of Congress and refer him to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for criminal prosecution.

The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, chaired by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), approved the explosive contempt resolution Thursday morning in an 8-7 party-line vote.

Every Republican voted to hold Fauci accountable.

Every Democrat voted against the referral.

The vote came after Fauci defied a congressional subpoena and pleaded the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times rather than answer questions about COVID-19, dangerous gain-of-function research, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and his previous testimony under oath.

The matter will now be sent to federal prosecutors.

If convicted of contempt of Congress, Fauci could face up to one year in prison and a fine of up to $100,000.

‘A Subpoena Is Not an Invitation’

Paul delivered a blistering warning before the committee voted to refer Fauci for prosecution.

“A subpoena is not an invitation,” Paul declared.

“A subpoena with no consequences is not a subpoena; it’s a suggestion.

“Seeking the truth is not a witch hunt.

“Accountability is not vengeance.

“Accountability is what stands between the American people and a repeat of the mistakes and the very real consequences of the past.”

Paul said contempt votes should be rare but warned that Congress would surrender its constitutional oversight authority if powerful government officials could simply ignore subpoenas without consequence.

The committee ultimately agreed.

Fauci’s refusal to testify is now a potential criminal matter.

WATCH:

Fauci Pleaded the Fifth More Than 100 Times

Fauci was subpoenaed to appear before the committee on July 29 for what was expected to be a long-awaited reckoning over his role in the federal government’s pandemic response.

Republicans questioned the former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director about high-risk virology experiments, U.S. funding connected to research in Wuhan, his relationship with intelligence officials, and whether he lied to Congress.

Fauci refused to answer.

“On advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution,” Fauci repeated throughout the hearing.

He invoked the constitutional protection against self-incrimination more than 100 times.

Fauci would not even answer questions about whether a red folder was sitting in front of him, what day of the week it was, or the color of his tie.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) said Fauci’s blanket refusal to answer even harmless questions amounted to an abuse of the Fifth Amendment.

Biden Pardon May Have Destroyed Fauci’s Defense

Fauci’s legal position is complicated by the sweeping pardon he received from former President Joe Biden.

Biden issued Fauci a “full and unconditional pardon” covering federal offenses committed between January 1, 2014, and January 19, 2026.

Paul’s contempt resolution argues that the pardon eliminated Fauci’s reasonable fear of prosecution for conduct during that period.

In other words, Fauci may have lost the legal basis for invoking the Fifth Amendment while still refusing to comply with a congressional subpoena.

The resolution also argues that Fauci waived the privilege by delivering an opening statement attacking Paul’s investigation before refusing to answer lawmakers’ questions.

That dispute will now move beyond the hearing room and into the hands of the Justice Department.

Democrats Fight to Stop Criminal Referral

Committee Democrats made repeated attempts to delay or kill the contempt resolution.

Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI), the committee’s ranking member, tried to table the measure over concerns that it could reach prosecutors without a full Senate vote.

Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH) demanded that the committee pause until outside legal experts could evaluate Fauci’s Fifth Amendment strategy.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) sought to delay the referral until Fauci’s attorney could testify.

Blumenthal also argued that Fauci should receive a guarantee from the Justice Department that he would not be prosecuted before being compelled to answer questions.

Republicans rejected every attempt.

Paul accused Democrats of running interference for Fauci and trying to prevent accountability.

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) revealed that Democrats had not reviewed the committee’s investigative evidence through its internal document system.

“If the investigation seems one-sided, it’s because one side simply doesn’t want to look at the truth,” Johnson said.

Fauci’s Reckoning Has Arrived

For years, Fauci was protected by the corporate media, Democrat officials, and the federal bureaucracy.

He championed lockdowns, masks, mandates, school closures, and dangerous virus research while dismissing Americans who questioned his authority.

When Congress finally placed him under subpoena and demanded answers, Fauci refused to speak.

He pleaded the Fifth more than 100 times.

Now a Senate committee has formally voted to refer him for criminal prosecution.

The man once presented as the untouchable face of “science” is no longer merely facing difficult questions.

Fauci is facing the Justice Department.

And he could be facing prison.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/fauci-faces-prison-senate-votes-refer-criminal-prosecution/

And,

READ MORE – Ex-CBS Reporter Says She Was Taken Off Air After ‘Questioning’ Fauci During Pandemic: ‘You Weren’t Supposed to Question the Agenda’

August 7th, 2026

Blogger Comment: All you need to know about this piece of shit and Globalist WEF controlled stooge lead author of this depopulation agenda article Mark Keegan, is all here and only wants to kill humanity on a massive scale, but where he has his figures wrong where the WEF Globalists have stated many times that they want to reduce Humanity to 400 million and to 1/10th of what Keegan and his genocide scientists gang want to do to humanity’s-numbers   https://everydayconcerned.net/2020/12/10/mark-keenan-former-un-environmental-officer-false-and-deceptive-un-and-wef-narratives-on-corona-reset-agenda-2030-all-part-of-the-one-world-government-agenda-of-control/

.

A group of international scientists is pushing a chilling plan to slash a staggering 4 billion people from the global population of humans to achieve what they describe as a “sustainable” future for those selected to remain on Earth.

The scientists made the call in a newly published study, reigniting alarm over the global depopulation agenda after the researchers argued that the Earth’s population should be cut roughly in half.

The study, authored by roughly a dozen researchers led by Columbia University’s Mark Keegan, contends that the world’s population must be culled to approximately four billion people by the year 2200.

“We show that slowing and gradually reversing population growth to ∼4 billion or less by 2200, while moderating per capita impacts, is the path toward sustainability,” the authors wrote.

The researchers also called for reducing “per capita impacts,” a reference to lowering individual consumption of energy, resources, and other goods.

Researchers Blame Humanity for Environmental Problems

The study argues that population growth is driving a wide range of environmental issues, including declining wildlife populations, rising carbon dioxide emissions, greater energy consumption, increased freshwater use, expanded mineral extraction, plastic production, pesticide use, and a growing ecological footprint.

“Global environmental problems are caused by people, nothing else,” the authors asserted.

“The more of us there are, the greater our overall economic demands and the greater the associated environmental problems.”

They concluded that continued population growth is fundamentally “unsustainable.”

Using United Nations population projections, the researchers argued that humanity is on course to peak at between 9 billion and more than 11 billion people by the end of the century; levels they claim pose an unacceptable threat to long-term sustainability.

Calls for More Population-Control Policies

To accelerate population decline, the study recommends expanding access to what it describes as “reproductive health services,” a term that commonly includes abortion alongside contraception.

The authors also call for improving girls’ educational opportunities, particularly in developing nations, as part of their strategy for reducing birth rates.

Beyond reducing population growth, they advocate additional government intervention aimed at lowering consumption through stricter land-use policies, pollution controls, energy-efficiency targets, and expanded limits on the extraction of natural resources ranging from fisheries to forests.

The researchers argue that even stronger measures may ultimately be required at the local, national, and international levels.

Critics Say Population Collapse Is the Real Threat

While the study warns of overpopulation, many demographers argue that the opposite problem is rapidly emerging.

Global fertility has already fallen dramatically.

The study itself acknowledges that the worldwide fertility rate stood at just 2.2 children per woman in 2024, barely above the replacement level needed to maintain stable populations.

Other researchers have warned that much of the developed world is already experiencing sustained below-replacement fertility, setting the stage for long-term population decline.

A major study published in The Lancet projected that the world could begin experiencing a steep population decline within decades.

Economist Dean Spears of the University of Texas Population Research Center has similarly warned that once fertility remains below replacement for an extended period, the world’s population could eventually shrink to “very small” numbers.

According to Spears and his co-authors, prolonged population decline could trigger widespread economic and social consequences, including shrinking workforces, reduced innovation, deteriorating infrastructure, labor shortages, declining mental health, and mounting pressure on healthcare systems caring for aging populations.

Even the World Economic Forum has acknowledged that large-scale population collapse could have “severe” consequences.

Debate Over Earth’s Carrying Capacity

The assumption that Earth cannot support its current population remains highly contested.

Research on the planet’s carrying capacity varies dramatically.

Some studies estimate Earth can sustainably support roughly 8 billion people, close to today’s global population.

Others conclude the planet could sustain 16 billion people or more, while several estimates place the number as high as 64 billion.

One study even projected a theoretical carrying capacity exceeding 1 trillion people under certain technological assumptions.

Past Predictions Failed to Materialize

Psychologist Jordan Peterson has frequently pointed to earlier warnings of catastrophic overpopulation that never came to pass.

Discussing predictions made decades ago by the globalist pro-depopulation Club of Rome, Peterson noted that many forecasts warned of mass starvation, riots, and societal collapse by the turn of the century because there were supposedly “too many people on the planet.”

“That just didn’t happen at all,” Peterson said.

“It wasn’t just wrong, it was anti-true.

“It was absolutely wrong.”

Instead, Peterson argued, living standards improved dramatically around the world, with hundreds of millions of people escaping extreme poverty.

Author Eric Metaxas has similarly criticized modern overpopulation fears as descendants of Thomas Malthus’ population theory, which predicted that population growth would inevitably outstrip food production.

Environmental scientist Erle C. Ellis has also challenged the premise, arguing that advances in technology have repeatedly expanded humanity’s ability to support larger populations.

According to Ellis, history demonstrates that societies have consistently sustained populations well beyond what traditional Malthusian models predicted, leading him to conclude that there is “no such thing as a human carrying capacity” in any fixed sense.

The study nevertheless adds to a growing body of proposals advocating lower birth rates, reduced consumption, and expanded government intervention as solutions to global environmental challenges, recommendations that amount to another push for population control despite mounting evidence that many nations are instead confronting demographic decline.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/scientists-push-plan-slash-global-population-4-billion/

And,

READ MORE – Biologist: Bill Gates ‘Destroyed’ Entire Ecosystem with Mosquito Agenda