World Freedom

Blogger Comment: People just do not realise that the “only” thing that can stop the WEF Globalists in Davos controlling Western Civilization and devastating it” through what they have been undertaking satanically across the world on humanity since 1971 where their ultimate goal is to take our ‘freedom away from us and totally subservant to them forever, is TRUMP…as they know that he can physically destroy them and it only takes a fake war like the Globalists have used in modern-times and before (including Ukraine and all wars across the Middle-East together with what their forerunner Globalists used from JD Rockefeller onwards to do this, for all wars are economic at their base if you undertake your own ‘independent’ in-depth search, as WAR is big Business for the Globalists), with the military intelligence networks that the USA has around the world and at Trump’s disposal…

.

President Donald Trump is preparing to storm the heart of the globalist establishment, bringing his America First agenda directly into the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) annual summit in Davos, Switzerland.

Trump’s appearance at the elite gathering, long synonymous with open borders, free trade absolutism, and unelected global governance, represents a direct challenge to the ideological consensus that has dominated the WEF summit for decades.

This year’s Davos theme, “A Spirit of Dialogue,” rings hollow to critics as the global elite scramble to preserve their image of openness in the face of a U.S. president who has openly rejected multilateralism and global economic central planning.

World Economic Forum CEO Børge Brende confirmed Trump’s attendance during an online press conference.

Brende noted it has been six years since Trump last appeared in person during his first term.

“We’re pleased to welcome back President Trump,” Brende said, claiming the gathering exists to “connect the dots” and identify areas for collaboration.

“Dialogue is not a luxury,” he added.

“Dialogue is really a necessity.”

Trump’s record suggests something very different.

Confrontation, Not Compromise

Trump is arriving in Davos with the largest U.S. delegation in history.

The team includes Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and special envoy Steve Witkoff, who oversees Middle East and Ukraine negotiations.

Rather than signaling accommodation, the lineup underscores Trump’s intent to confront the Davos orthodoxy head-on, dropping the hammer on the globalist elite in person.

Brende himself admitted the summit is unfolding amid “the most complex geopolitical backdrop since 1945,” a reality shaped in part by Trump’s rejection of globalist assumptions about trade, security, and sovereignty.

Economist Karen Harris of Bain & Co. acknowledged the shift bluntly, stating that 2025 will likely be remembered as the year “neoliberal globalization ended.”

She described the emerging order as one in which the United States prioritizes national security and uses economic power strategically, precisely the worldview Trump has championed since 2016.

Global Flashpoints Loom as Trump Returns to Davos

This year’s attendee list includes Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, setting the stage for tension over Ukraine, Iran, Venezuela, Gaza, Greenland, and China.

Trump’s posture toward these conflicts, skeptical of endless entanglements, hostile to global bureaucracies, and unapologetically nationalist, stands in sharp contrast to the Davos consensus.

In a video address to Davos last year following his second inauguration, Trump warned nations to move manufacturing back to the United States or face tariffs.

His message directly challenged decades of global trade dogma.

That stance has only hardened.

Global Institutions Exposed as Tools of Ideological Control

Philippe Dauba-Pantanacce, Standard Chartered’s head of geopolitical analysis, noted that Trump’s worldview amounts to a “broad rejection of multilateral institutions,” which he said are increasingly incompatible with competitive national interests.

Pascal Lamy, former head of the World Trade Organization, admitted Trump has fundamentally altered the trade conversation, even if the global economy has not yet fully absorbed the impact.

Among the 850 CEOs attending Davos are Nvidia’s Jensen Huang and Microsoft’s Satya Nadella, underscoring the forum’s blend of corporate power and political influence, precisely the alliance Trump has long criticized.

Trump’s Davos Appearance Follows Sweeping Global Withdrawal

Trump’s return to the WEF summit comes just days after he withdrew the United States from 66 international organizations, including climate bodies and UN-linked agencies tied to gender policy and urban governance.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio described many of these entities as “redundant, mismanaged, unnecessary, wasteful, and captured by actors advancing agendas contrary to our nation’s sovereignty and prosperity.”

Rubio warned that these institutions have evolved into “a sprawling architecture of global governance dominated by progressive ideology and detached from national interests.”

The move is projected to save billions in taxpayer dollars and marks a decisive rejection of climate mandates, DEI orthodoxy, and sovereignty-eroding frameworks pushed by global bureaucrats.

A Message Davos Cannot Ignore

Trump’s presence in Davos is not about diplomacy or appeasement.

The president is there to make a statement.

By showing up, flanked by a powerhouse delegation, Trump is forcing the global elite to confront a new reality: the United States is no longer willing to subsidize globalist schemes that weaken national sovereignty and hollow out domestic prosperity.

The era of quiet compliance is over.

Davos may preach “dialogue,” but Trump is bringing something far more disruptive: accountability.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/trump-crash-davos-drop-hammer-wef-globalists/

And,

READ MORE – Globalists Panic: Trump Is Destroying ‘World Order’

Blogger Comment: This is what “PEOPLE POWER” does for the people and more of this should happen for the people’s future wellbeing and basically their vey survival in what is coming, come 2030 if the Davos Globalist elites get their way with humanity and their freedom…period

.

A planned Islamic center and mosque in the community of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma was struck down by the city council in a 4-1 vote after months of steep pushback from residents.

The decision followed weeks of public debate, including packed meetings and an investigation announced by the Oklahoma Attorney General. The project, proposed by the Islamic Society of Tulsa (IST), aimed to address overcrowding at its existing Midtown Tulsa mosque, where half of its approximately 1,000 members reside in Broken Arrow.

The proposed development was planned for 15 acres on South Olive Avenue, just south of the Creek Turnpike, land purchased by the IST in 2014 for $625,000 and later deeded to the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT). It would have included a 42,000-square-foot building featuring a mosque for worship, a retail strip mall, and a public clinic.

Initial plans called for more than 700 parking spaces, but this was reduced to around 150-200 in a revised proposal presented to the council. The rezoning sought to change the land from its current designation to commercial use, aligning with the city’s 2019 comprehensive plan, which envisions the area for commercial or high-density residential development.

The Broken Arrow Planning Commission approved the rezoning on December 18, 2025, despite fierce public opposition at that meeting. However, the City Council, in a special meeting held at Northeastern State University’s Broken Arrow campus, rejected the request.

Mayor Debra Wimpee, along with Councilors David Pickel, Lisa Ford, and Justin Green, voted to deny, while Vice Mayor Johnnie Parks voted in favor.The council cited incompatibility with land use standards, including concerns over traffic congestion, stormwater runoff, insufficient infrastructure, and parking adequacy

“My vote to deny the rezoning was based strictly on a lack of sufficient infrastructure on Olive Avenue for the influx of weekly traffic to a mosque,” Mayor Wimpee told local outlet KJRH.

BIG WIN: Broken Arrow Council rejects plan for a 15-acre IsIamic center after residents flooded tonight's meeting

pic.twitter.com/Jgr1zgKNuh

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) January 13, 2026

Community pushback was significant, with over 1,000 people attending the January 12 meeting and more than 400 signing up for public comment. An opposition-only community meeting on January 5, 2026, drew several hundred participants, where supporters were not allowed to speak.

Opponents focused on zoning, traffic, and environmental impacts, though some raised concerns about Islam and potential extremist ties. “When an organization has been repeatedly connected by courtroom rulings, FBI investigations and public officials to extremist groups, caution is not fear-mongering — it’s common sense,” said local resident Linda Russell, according to a report from the Tulsa Flyer.

The Oklahoma chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) framed the opposition as a “witch hunt” and accused detractors of “racism.”

“I sincerely hope they will be guided by questions and conversations about facts as we heard — the traffic and rainwater and sewage — and not about Islamophobic discourse that has unfortunately dominated a lot of the conversation,” said CAIR-Oklahoma Executive Director Veronica Laizure-Henry.

IST spokesperson Aslam Syed indicated that the group will be challenging the decision in court.

Article By Hunter Fielding

.

Note that this article is declared with no financial reward income involved whatsover for the World Freedom Website and only for the people’s information and knowledge…so where the people know what is going on in the world and their respective western government and in this case, The USA…

Blogger Comment: This is how the Democrats brainwash our children these days and into believing that “lies are the truth” and another exposure of why the Democrats are so corrupt and manipulative, even at such an impressionable very young age…it is known by adults as brainwashing, but where this brainwashing last all their lives in the main and why it is so corrosive to a child’s upbringing and their principles when they become adults, that are moulded entirely at this age as truths that they always remember…for the Democrats never let the far-left down, by corrupting the minds of the innocents…

.

Virginia Democrats have filed legislation aimed at setting clear standards for how public schools present the Jan. 6 breach of the U.S. Capitol.

House Bill 333, sponsored by Delegate Dan Helmer (D‑Fairfax), would allow local school boards to teach about the event while requiring that lessons follow specific guidelines.

The measure reflects a growing state role in shaping civic education while leaving day-to-day instructional decisions in the hands of local authorities.

Under the proposed bill, classroom instruction must characterize Jan. 6 as a violent and unprecedented attack on democratic institutions, government infrastructure and elected officials.

Teachers would be prohibited from presenting the day as a peaceful demonstration or treating claims of widespread election fraud that could have altered the 2020 presidential election as credible.

HB 333 is deliberately limited, according to The Center Square.

Schools would not be compelled to include the topic in their lessons, statewide curriculum standards would remain unaffected and private schools would not be subject to its provisions.

Helmer’s office emphasized that the legislation aims to ensure that instruction is based on verified historical facts rather than partisan perspectives, giving educators a framework while protecting local control.

The legislation does not impose criminal penalties or establish enforcement mechanisms. Instead, it sets parameters for how schools that choose to address Jan. 6 may structure their lessons.

Local boards retain discretion over whether and how to cover the events, preserving flexibility in instructional planning.

The bill was submitted ahead of the 2026 Regular Session of the Virginia General Assembly, which begins on Wednesday.

Virginia’s proposal is part of a broader national discussion on teaching recent historical events.

In New York, for example, legislation has been proposed that would require public schools to cover Jan. 6 and its aftermath as part of civic education courses.

Advocates of including these lessons argue that students must understand threats to democratic institutions and learn to critically evaluate misinformation.

Supporters of HB 333 maintain that the bill provides students with accurate, fact-based instruction on a violent attack against government institutions, reducing the risk of partisan interpretation in classrooms.

Critics, on the other hand, warn that mandating specific language could limit teachers’ autonomy, constrain academic freedom and diminish local control over curriculum decisions.

Education policy experts note that K‑12 curriculum decisions have traditionally been managed by local school boards and educators.

Imposing statutory requirements for how recent historical events are described may blur the line between education and political messaging, according to The Wall Street Journal.

HB 333 highlights the ongoing tension between state oversight and local authority in shaping classroom content.

As the General Assembly considers the proposal, observers will be watching to see whether Virginia’s approach influences other states considering similar measures.

The bill touches on broader debates about civic education, the teaching of contemporary history and the appropriate role of state governments in guiding instructional content.

By providing explicit guidance on how Jan. 6 may be addressed, HB 333 seeks to balance educational integrity with factual accuracy.

Lawmakers, educators, and parents alike face the challenge of presenting recent political events responsibly while maintaining local discretion and ensuring students receive a clear understanding of history.

Virginia Delegate Dan Helmer (D) just introduced a bill which would require public schools who teach about January 6th to say it was a violent insurrection to overturn the election results and ban teachers from saying there was election fraud pic.twitter.com/XzQ7rYnoY5

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) January 13, 2026

Article By Reece Walker

.

Note that this article is declared with no financial reward income involved whatsover for the World Freedom Website and only for the people’s information and knowledge…so where the people know what is going on in the world and their respective western government and in this case, The USA…

Blogger Comment: The following is a hot-of-the press article from ‘News Addicts’ and it should send shivers down the spine of all those who love humanity and where there are possible many traitors within the inner sanctums in most Western nations, as only ‘four’ western nations are now free in the West of the Davos Globalist’s chains of freedom control, where western leaders are no more that puppets and servants of the Davos elites, all bought and paid for and that’s why Vance and Trump are so vital to humankind’s future freedom long-term…those western nations free of Globalists control and therefore freedom presently for their people are, The USA, Hungary, Slovakia and Italy…read up yourself in the alternative information arena if you do not know this…

.

The O’Keefe Media Group on Tuesday released a bombshell report detailing how a member of Vice President JD Vance’s protection detail shared sensitive information on Vance’s security with an undercover reporter.

The agent in question is Tomas Escotto, a five-year Secret Service veteran assigned to Vice President Vance’s protective detail. Escotto is described as a holdover from the Biden administration who had voted for the former president in the past.

His role involved direct responsibilities in Vance’s security, including participation in shift rotations, advance planning for movements, and on-site protection during travel. As part of Vance’s detail, Escotto had access to operational details critical to ensuring the safety of the Vice President and his family.

Like most O’Keefe Media Group reports, the agent disclosed information over a series of interactions with an individual he thought was a Tinder date, but was actually an undercover journalist.

Escotto met the journalist under the pretense of casual dating and gradually shared information about Vance’s security arrangements. The shared details included protective formations in the event of an emergency, shift schedules, travel plans and real time locations concerning the vice president’s whereabouts.

Escotto also sent photographs taken during duty, including images from Air Force Two while onboard with Vance, some containing embedded location data. The report notes that these disclosures occurred despite Escotto’s awareness of confidentiality rules, as he had previously signed a non-disclosure agreement.

“We have different shifts,” he said during one of the interactions. He frequently indicated that he could “not say too much” before continuing to disclose sensitive information.

“So we been there ahead of time before him. Just in case. We left, he. Days ahead,” he said in reference to Secret Service security protocols. He also disclosed multiple locations the vice president was set to travel to before he had done so.

Escotto also expressed personal views on related policies, saying, “The Trump admin deploying tactics that shouldn’t be deployed,” and “I don’t agree with that at all.” He also criticized the Trump Administration’s deportation agenda, saying, “I hate that [ICE] sh**.”

BREAKING: U.S. Secret Service Agent Assigned to VP JD Vance Leaks Sensitive Security Information to Undercover Reporter.

Escotto is a holdover from the Biden administration and stated that he voted for Joe Biden, while expressing opposition to ICE & the Trump administration’s… pic.twitter.com/AyAjrt3XY4

— James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) January 13, 2026

Sharing sensitive security information could compromise the safety of protectees by exposing vulnerabilities to potential threats, such as unauthorized tracking or targeted actions, OMG founder James O’Keefe said in narration. In disclosing the information he did, the agent opened himself up to significant disciplinary, and potential legal consequences.

The Secret Service responded promptly after OMG coordinated with them prior to publication, requesting redactions of specific operational details to avoid further risks. Escotto was placed on administrative leave, with his security clearance suspended and access to agency facilities and systems revoked, the agency said.

“The U.S. Secret Service has no tolerance for any behavior that could potentially compromise the safety, privacy or trust of our protectees. This incident is under investigation, and the employee involved has been placed on administrative leave with his clearance suspended and access to agency facilities and systems revoked,” said Deputy Secret Service Director Matthew Quinn.

Quinn also noted in an internal memo that the agency issued an order for all personnel to retake required anti-espionage training. “We sincerely apologize for this incident, which infringed on the privacy of the Vance family,” the Secret Service said in a follow-up statement.

“We will take necessary measures to prevent any recurrence of such violations.”

Article By Hunter Fielding

.

Note that this article is declared with no financial reward income involved whatsover for the World Freedom Website and only for the people’s information and knowledge…so where the people know what is going on in the world and their respective western government and in this case, The USA…

Blogger Comment: This is the end game that the Globalists in Davos would like to see happen and shows that they need to destroy all ‘free-speech’ 100% to control humanity and then to our ultimate demise that would be a nightmare forever for all people in the West and ultimately the Globalist’s plans to reduce humankind to less than 500 million, where they have stated this many times since 1971 with their founding of the insane WEF…period

.

The socialist UK government is mulling plans to ban the social media giant X, owned by Elon Musk, over supposed online safety concerns.

UK Technology Secretary Liz Kendall has voiced support for regulator Ofcom to potentially restrict access to X if the platform fails to comply with national online safety laws.

The nation’s censors are specifically citing the use of X’s artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, Grok, which has been used to manipulate digital images.

The government argues that it is a crime to create AI-generated images of people without their consent.

Ofcom is conducting an urgent assessment of the situation after contacting X on Monday and setting a Friday deadline for the company to explain its actions, to which X has responded.

Downing Street has also criticized a recent change to Grok’s image function, now limited to paid users.

The foreign government claims the change is disrespectful to victims of sexual violence.

The issue has sparked heated debate over digital accountability and the balance between free expression and safety in online spaces.

Grok, X’s AI chatbot, has landed in hot water for enabling users to digitally alter images of prominent individuals.

While critics claims they tools are used for sexual purposes, they are more often being used to mock politicians.

Technology Secretary Liz Kendall didn’t mince words, stating:

“Sexually manipulating images of women and children is despicable and abhorrent.”

X’s response has been to restrict Grok’s image feature to those shelling out a monthly fee, a move Downing Street called “insulting” to alleged victims.

Meanwhile, Ofcom is demanding that X justify its handling of Grok.

An Ofcom spokesperson confirmed:

“We urgently made contact [with X] on Monday and set a firm deadline of today [Friday] to explain themselves, to which we have received a response.”

Now, an expedited review is underway to determine next steps.

Under the UK’s censorship laws, the Online Safety Act, Ofcom holds the power to seek court orders that could kneecap X’s ability to operate or raise funds in the country if it stonewalls compliance.

These measures, while largely untested, signal that regulators mean business.

Elon Musk, never one to shy from a fight, fired back with:

“The UK government wants any excuse for censorship.”

Ofcom’s findings, expected soon, will likely shape whether this escalates to a full showdown.

If a ban looms, expect Musk to push back against government censorship.

For now, the ball is in Ofcom’s court as it weighs X’s response and the broader implications of Grok’s use.

Follow te link fior the source… https://slaynews.com/news/uk-government-threatens-potential-ban-elon-musks-x-ai-use/

And,

READ MORE – Elon Musk Declares ‘War’ After Somali TikToker Threatens His Life

Blogger Comment: This is where AI is leading humanity…having no real purpose at all and what the Globalists have been aiming for over the last 54 years in earnest with the creation of their insane World Economic Forum driving all the gears and world totally against humanity with their insane thinking and mindsets…the problem is, is that we are funding our own demise and principally through our own money…taxation that we all pay to our western governments where our leaders are controlled now by the WEF Globalists in Davos…look it up and do your research if you do not believe it…but sources that are independent knowledge sources of course and NOT from our ‘legacy’ MSM, as they are all owned lock, stock and barrel by the Globalists and only allow you to know what the Globalists will only allow you to know…their own propoganda…but not that it is going to destroy you of course and your loved ones…period

.

Yoshua Bengio, one of the world’s most influential artificial intelligence researchers and a pioneer of modern deep-learning systems, is warning that the rapid advance of AI will eventually make every job category vulnerable to automation, including skilled trades long assumed to be resistant to technological replacement.

Bengio, whose work helped lay the foundation for today’s AI revolution, says it is only a matter of time before artificial intelligence and robotics advance far enough to compete not just with office workers and knowledge-economy professionals, but with plumbers, electricians, construction workers, and other hands-on trades.

Desk jobs, or as Bengio called them, “cognitive jobs, the jobs that you can do behind a keyboard,” will be the first casualties of automation.

“It’s just a matter of time” before all jobs are replaced with AI-driven automation, Bengino stressed on Steven Bartlett’s Diary of a CEO podcast.

“Unless we hit a wall scientifically, like some obstacle prevents us from making progress to make AIs smarter and smarter, there’s going to be a time when they’ll be doing more and more, able to do more and more of the work that people do …

“And then, of course, it takes years for companies to really integrate that into their workflows, but they’re eager to do it.

“So it’s more a matter of time than, is it happening or not?”

His assessment reflects growing concern inside the AI research community that the pace of progress is moving far faster than most policymakers and most workers are prepared to confront.

For years, economists and technologists widely assumed that physical trades would remain insulated from large-scale automation because they require dexterity, improvisation, and the ability to work in unpredictable environments.

Bengio, also known as the “Godfather of AI” due to his pioneering work in the field, now challenges that belief.

He is arguing that once AI is combined with machine vision, robotics, and advanced sensor systems, even complex physical work may become automatable.

Tasks that today seem impossible for machines, he suggests, may become routine sooner than the public expects.

At the heart of Bengio’s warning is a simple economic reality: once automated systems become cheaper, more reliable, and more scalable than human labor, businesses will face overwhelming financial incentives to adopt them.

That calculus applies across industries and job categories, regardless of the social consequences.

Under that framework, Bengio argues, widespread job displacement is not a hypothetical scenario but an eventual inevitability.

The technology will only get smarter as more firms lean on AI and eventually robots, too, he said.

“As companies are deploying more and more robots, they will be collecting more and more data,” Bengio said when asked whether AI will replace all human workers.

“So eventually, it’s going to happen.”

Even young people trying to outsmart automation by ditching degrees or upskilling into trade jobs are destined for the same dead end.

“So if you do a physical job—as Geoffrey Hinton is often saying, you should be a plumber or something—it’s going to take more time [for AI to replace your job], but I think it’s only a temporary thing.”

Such a shift carries far-reaching implications.

If both white-collar professions and blue-collar trades face long-term automation risk, long-standing assumptions about career stability, including the belief that learning a trade offers reliable protection from economic disruption, may no longer hold true.

Education models, workforce planning, and the broader meaning of work itself could be forced to undergo fundamental change.

Bengio does not present a single policy prescription but stresses the urgency of preparing for a future in which traditional employment may no longer serve as the primary foundation of economic security.

Debates over universal basic income, expanded safety net models, and large-scale retraining programs have become more common as governments attempt to anticipate the fallout, although there remains little agreement over how such systems would be funded or implemented.

Critics of Bengio’s outlook point to earlier technological revolutions, arguing that innovation historically created more jobs than it eliminated, even if transitions were difficult.

They contend that AI will augment human work rather than replace it entirely, generating new roles that do not yet exist.

Bengio acknowledges that historical precedent, but cautions that artificial intelligence represents a fundamentally different class of technology, one capable of competing with both human cognitive abilities and physical labor simultaneously.

He and other AI researchers warn that dismissing that distinction could leave societies unprepared for the most disruptive labor transformation in modern history.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/pioneering-ai-scientist-sounds-alarm-matter-time-every-single-job-replaced-automation/

Blogger Comment: This is the chilling story and indictment of the UK under the Labour Government in only one year in power…that is totally confusing our children and how they have to think and where ‘Conservatism’ right thinking is seen as tyrannical through their subtle and passive brainwashing processes, so that it is imbedded into their mind for life and forever…but where the real truth is with this Labour brainwashing process is against all human values and that are literally, crimes against humanity in all truth…as children are just learning right from wrong and when they are taught ‘wrong is right’, their perception of life is destroyed on the altar of far-left manipulation…for we once thjiought tat tghis could only happen in the 1930s and 40s Germany or the former communist controlled USSR…period

.

In a chilling escalation of state-backed indoctrination, the UK government has rolled out a taxpayer-funded program that teaches children to associate skepticism of left-wing policies with terrorism.

At the center of the initiative is “Pathways,” a video game aimed at teenagers that frames mainstream conservative views as warning signs of “far-right extremism.”

The “game” is funded through the UK Home Office under its controversial Prevent counter-terrorism scheme.

Pathways is being introduced to children as young as 11.

The message is blunt and warns children that, if they question mass immigration, discuss British identity, or engage in the wrong online debate, they could be flagged as a potential extremist and referred to counter-terror authorities.

A ‘Game’ That Punishes Wrongthink

Developed by Shout Out UK, Pathways targets 11- to 18-year-olds.

Players guide a character named Charlie, referred to with “they” pronouns, through everyday scenarios that quickly escalate into extremist warnings.

In one scenario, Charlie loses out academically to a black student and must choose whether to accept the outcome or blame immigrants for “stealing jobs.”

Selecting the latter increases an in-game “extremism meter.”

Another sequence presents a video claiming Muslim men are taking housing from veterans and that the government is betraying “white British people.”

Engaging with the content triggers alerts that Charlie is now consuming “harmful ideological messages,” with the game warning that some of the groups involved are “actually illegal.”

Even researching immigration statistics online is portrayed as a dangerous gateway, flooding the screen with material about the alleged “replacement” of white people.

Joining a protest over the “erosion of British values” nearly ends in arrest.

The game goes on to warn players that concerns about “British values” are supposedly driven by racism rather than patriotism.

According to The Telegraph, poor in-game decisions culminate in mandatory counseling for “ideological thoughts” or full Prevent referrals, complete with mentors tasked with correcting a child’s political beliefs.

Defenders Admit the Goal

Matteo Bergamini, founder and CEO of Shout Out UK, defended the program by openly describing it as a tool to shape political thinking.

“Teaching media literacy ensures that all those impacted by our programmes leave with life-long tools and skills to safeguard themselves from these threats,” Bergamini said.

Bergamini added that the game was built “to teach about the concept of extremism and radicalisation and illustrate the scope of online dangers.”

A Home Office spokesman echoed the justification, claiming Prevent has diverted thousands away from “violent ideologies,” including what it now labels “Extreme Right Wing” beliefs.

But critics note that Prevent’s scope has dramatically expanded.

GB News has reported that concerns about mass migration and cultural nationalism are now treated as extremist indicators.

Referrals for right-wing views reached 19 percent in 2024, outpacing Islamist cases, even as MI5 continues to warn that Islamist extremism accounts for the vast majority of terror threats.

A Broader Crackdown on Dissent

The Pathways rollout does not stand alone.

It coincides with mounting pressure from the leftist Labour Party government to regulate or even ban online platforms that allow unfiltered political debate.

Globalist Prime Minister Keir Starmer recently lashed out at X over AI-generated images, declaring, “This is disgraceful.

“It’s disgusting, and it’s not to be tolerated.”

“All options are on the table,” Starmer warned.

Labour MPs have openly argued that platforms like X “have no right to be accessed” if they fail to comply.

At the same time, schools continue to promote radical gender ideology and revisionist history under the banner of “inclusion,” with groups like Stonewall pressuring schools to erase biological language and embed activism across curricula, often in direct conflict with official guidance.

“Fundamentally Undemocratic”

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has warned that these policies amount to grooming a generation to police thought rather than engage in debate.

“If kids are told that questioning net zero or immigration is extremist content, then you are setting a narrative for a future generation that is fundamentally undemocratic,” Farage said, calling Starmer the “biggest threat to free speech” in British history.

X owner Elon Musk has likewise warned that the public must act before the UK’s slide toward censorship becomes irreversible.

Taken together, Pathways and the expanding reach of Prevent paint a stark picture: a state no longer willing to debate dissenting views, but determined to pre-empt them, starting with children.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/uk-government-begins-teaching-kids-associate-conservative-views-terrorism/

And,

READ MORE – UK Government Pushes ‘Cradle to Grave’ Digital ID for Babies Plan

Blogger Comment: This is ‘part’ of the Globalist’s depopulation of humanity as they drive forward their plans to eliminate humans to below 500 million and where they have said so, so this is not a programme of care to prevent suffering, but a system to directly reduce humans, just like Hitler was doing and what the Globalists are doing through throght their wars like in the Ukraine as an example and and man-made pandemics like Covid-19 et al…wake up folks as this is reality and our MSM and all Western political leaders are not telling you, as they are all bought and owned by the Globalists other than four western nations now, The USA, Hungary, Slovakia and Italy which is another reality that the the most people are completely oblivious of what has really happened…

.

“Adolf Hitler: “The Obersalzberg Speech” https://www.bleadon.org.uk/media/other/24400/Hitler-obersalzberg-speech-22August1939.pdf

.

A chilling case now before the Supreme Court of British Columbia could result in religious hospitals and other faith-based facilities being forced into euthanizing their patients.

The landmark could have sweeping consequences for religious freedom and end-of-life care across Canada.

According to the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), the case carries “broad implications for religious freedom, patient choice, and the future of palliative care” nationwide.

At the center of the legal battle is whether faith-based health care institutions can be compelled by the state to provide euthanasia, officially referred to as Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD), even when doing so violates their moral and religious convictions.

MAiD is the Canadian government’s taxpayer-funded “assisted suicide” program that operates under the nation’s socialized healthcare system.

Hospice Granted Intervenor Status in Constitutional Challenge

Canada’s most prominent pro-life elderly care provider, the Delta Hospice Society, has been granted intervenor status in the case.

That designation allows the organization to present evidence and legal arguments in defense of euthanasia-free palliative care.

The JCCF confirmed that the trial began on Monday, January 12, 2026, and will run through February 6, 2026, in Vancouver.

Case Stems From Refusal by Catholic Hospital

The dispute stems from the case of Samantha O’Neill, a 34-year-old woman who was admitted to St. Paul’s Hospital in early 2022.

O’Neill was diagnosed with advanced cervical cancer.

According to the JCCF, O’Neill decided in 2023 that she wanted to be euthanized.

However, the hospital, operated by Providence Health Care Society, refused to carry out the procedure due to its Catholic foundation and adherence to Church teaching.

O’Neill later died in April 2023 while being transferred to another facility willing to administer lethal injections.

Lawsuit Claims Charter Rights Were Violated

Following her death, O’Neill’s mother, Gaye O’Neill, with support from the pro-euthanasia advocacy group Dying With Dignity Canada, launched a lawsuit against Providence Health Care Society and the Province of British Columbia.

The lawsuit alleges that the hospital’s refusal to provide euthanasia on-site caused unnecessary suffering and violated O’Neill’s Charter rights, including freedom of conscience and religion, as well as her rights to life, liberty, and security of the person.

Hospice Defends MAiD-Free Care

The Delta Hospice Society was granted intervenor status by Chief Justice Ronald A. Skolrood, enabling the society to argue that Charter protections require the availability of palliative care spaces free from euthanasia.

“We look forward to confirming section 7 of the Charter for Canadians who seek life-affirming spaces during their illnesses,” said Angelina Ireland, executive director of the society.

She added that patients should not be “deprived of life, liberty, and the security of the person” by being denied euthanasia-free care.

Lawyers Warn of Coercive Medical Culture

Constitutional lawyer Allison Pejovic emphasized that many terminally ill patients wish to spend their final days without pressure to end their lives.

“There are many terminally ill palliative care patients in British Columbia who desire to spend their final days without being asked if they want their life ended by their health care provider,” Pejovic said.

She stressed the importance of ensuring access to MAiD-free environments that uphold dignity, liberty, and bodily autonomy.

Broader Political Context

All intervenors must submit written arguments by March 2026.

The case unfolds amid a dramatic expansion of euthanasia under the Liberal government led by Prime Minister Mark Carney.

The nation has overseen a thirteenfold increase in assisted suicide since legalization in 2016.

Canada now operates the fastest-growing assisted suicide program in the world.

At the same time, Health Canada has advanced research into expanded euthanasia eligibility, while the Liberal government has pursued aggressively pro-abortion policies and weighed revoking charitable tax status from pro-life organizations and churches.

The outcome of this case could determine whether faith-based institutions retain the freedom to offer care rooted in the belief that human life should be protected until natural death, or whether the state can mandate participation in euthanasia against conscience.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-religious-hospitals-forced-begin-euthanizing-patients/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Government Euthanizes ‘Young & Healthy’ 26-Year-Old for ‘Depression’

Blogger Comment: Just another day at the office for the Corrupt Democrat Party that has just been uncovered that was buried…but ONLY $5,690million, so not a big deal I suppose based upon their Biden track record…“Top European Official Blows Whistle: Ukraine Stealing US Aid, Laundering Money Back to the Democrats” https://world-freedom.co.uk/2025/03/05/top-european-official-blows-whistle-ukraine-stealing-u-s-aid-laundering-money-back-to-democrats/

.

Two Senate Republicans are raising a red flag after uncovering a hidden measure in a hefty spending bill that could pour billions into refugee programs with questionable oversight.

Sens. Rand Paul (R-KY) and Mike Lee (R-UT) are firmly against a $5.69 billion provision for refugee assistance that was found buried in the fiscal year 2026 appropriations bill for the Departments of Labor and Health and Human Services (HHS).

This amount, triple what was budgeted before former President Joe Biden’s administration, has sparked fears of rampant fraud and a rollback of hard-won limits on welfare for noncitizens.

As head of the Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee, Paul is gearing up to fight.

He is proposing an amendment to stop this funding and pushing legislation to cut all welfare benefits for immigrants, including refugees.

“The big spenders in Congress are back in DC, hoping to pass a bill that spends billions on refugee benefits despite widespread reports of fraud,” Paul warned.

His sharp critique raises serious questions of why taxpayer dollars are being risked on programs so prone to misuse.

Meanwhile, Lee is championing his SAVE Act to mandate proof of citizenship for voting while calling for tougher immigration enforcement policies.

Opponents of the bill argue that this nearly $6 billion for refugee resettlement undercuts Trump-era measures that used executive action to restrict noncitizen access to federal benefits.

During Biden’s tenure, expansive immigration policies have welcomed hundreds of thousands of refugees, including about 200,000 evacuees from 2021 to 2023, with many from Afghanistan and Somalia.

A chilling case saw an Afghan evacuee charged with shooting two National Guard members near the White House, killing one, just before Thanksgiving, in a tragic example of the dangers of hasty resettlement without strict checks.

Under current rules, resettled refugees can access federal programs like SNAP, HUD assistance, and emergency Medicaid, as noted by the National Immigration Law Center.

Research from the Center for Immigration Studies shows 80% of Somalians resettled in Minnesota rely on public assistance, casting doubt on the long-term viability of such support.

Minnesota has also emerged as a cautionary tale, with state Medicaid programs reportedly exposed to fraud costing billions, amplifying concerns over unchecked federal spending.

Adding to the frustration, the so-called “Big Beautiful Bill” once eliminated Medicaid coverage for refugees and asylees, a protection now seemingly undone by this new proposal.

“New Year’s resolution: stop nonsense like this, pass my SAVE Act to require proof of citizenship to vote, and codify the MAGA agenda, especially on immigration and enforcement,” Sen. Lee urged.

His blunt challenge questions whether Congress prioritizes fiscal responsibility or political posturing.

With billions on the line, the stance of Paul and Lee serves as a reminder that every dollar spent demands scrutiny, especially when past policies aimed at curbing abuse are at risk of being dismantled.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/senate-republicans-challenge-hidden-measure-5-7-billion-refugee-funding/

And,

READ MORE – AG Bondi Deploys Federal Prosecutors to Minnesota to Investigate Somali Fraudsters

Blogger Comment: It appears that the corrupt United Nations thinks that it can force Trump and the American people to pay for their corruption that has been going on for years with no results for the people of the world…but Trump is different and 100% for the people, not the Davos Globalists that the UN serves now in reality…

.

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres issued a warning to President Donald Trump after the White House announced a sweeping withdrawal from dozens of international organizations.

In a message aimed at Trump, Guterres warned Washington that the United States remains legally obligated to pay its U.N. dues.

The Trump administration revealed on Wednesday that the U.S. is withdrawing from 66 international organizations, roughly half of which are affiliated with the United Nations.

The announcement is prompting panic and confusion among senior U.N. officials.

Despite the pullout, Guterres’s office insists that financial obligations remain unchanged.

On Thursday, Guterres spokesman Stéphane Dujarric said:

“Assessed contributions to the UN regular budget and peacekeeping budget, as approved by the General Assembly, are a legal obligation under the UN Charter for all member states, including the US.”

Dujarric added that the affected U.N. programs would continue operating regardless of the U.S. decision.

However, it is unclear how the U.N. expects to force the United States to fund the globalist body’s organizations.

According to U.N. officials, the organization learned of the withdrawals through media reports and White House social media posts, with no formal notification delivered directly to U.N. leadership.

The list of abandoned initiatives reportedly includes major programs focused on promoting radical left-wing ideology, all funded primarily by American tax dollars.

President Trump has said these programs “operate contrary to U.S. national interests.”

The United States remains the single largest contributor to the U.N.’s regular budget, paying the maximum allowed share of 22 percent as the world’s largest economy.

Those contributions are mandatory under the U.N. Charter.

The U.S. currently owes the organization approximately $1.5 billion.

Under U.N. rules, failure to pay could ultimately result in the loss of America’s voting rights in the General Assembly.

“We’re not going to renegotiate the charter,” Dujarric said flatly.

The Trump administration’s move also halts funding for a number of international initiatives not formally tied to the U.N., part of a broader effort to rein in foreign spending since the president began his second term last January.

U.S. officials have openly discussed plans to cut billions of dollars in international aid and funding for global organizations, arguing that taxpayer money should be prioritized for domestic needs.

Other Western nations are also reassessing their commitments.

France and the United Kingdom have signaled they may divert humanitarian funding toward military spending amid growing global instability.

While the administration has made clear it is willing to walk away from institutions it views as hostile to U.S. interests, the U.N.’s leadership is now signaling that disengagement will not exempt Washington from its financial responsibilities, setting the stage for a looming standoff between the Trump White House and the world body.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/united-nations-chief-warns-trump-us-legal-obligation-pay-dues/

And,

READ MORE – Globalists Panic: Trump Is Destroying ‘World Order’