World Freedom

Blogger Comment: People cannot see that this is the way to enslave humanity and all they see is what the Globalist controlled western MSM tell them about these God-like technologies, but where the real outcome will definitely be humanity’s control and mass enslavement… and the way in which the Globalists can do this forever…but no-one believes it of course…and when they do it will be too late as Hitler outlined…

.Global elites have taken a major step toward a coordinated digital governance regime, as European and Canadian officials unveiled new agreements linking digital identity systems, AI infrastructure, and online information control, all under the familiar banner of “trust” and “information integrity.”

The shift did not make headlines, but its implications are enormous.

Two new memoranda of understanding, one on Digital Credentials and Trust Services and another on Artificial Intelligence, bind Canada and the European Union to deeper collaboration on everything from digital identity wallets to shared data spaces for building advanced AI systems.

It is the latest move in a growing transnational effort to standardize digital identity frameworks and normalize government-managed information ecosystems across Western nations.

Cross-Border Digital IDs

The digital credentials agreement lays out a forum for joint experiments, harmonized technical standards, and the testing of “digital identity wallets.”

These wallets serve as software containers for verified government-approved credentials, allowing individuals to authenticate themselves across public and private systems.

In short, it serves as a cross-border digital ID infrastructure.

EU officials have long been pushing the European Digital Identity (EUDI) Wallet, which aims to give every EU citizen a unified digital identity recognized by government and commercial systems.

Canada, though behind Europe, has already laid the groundwork through its Pan-Canadian Trust Framework and multiple provincial pilots.

This new partnership suggests that any Canadian federal digital ID system will not be built in isolation; it will be aligned with global frameworks such as W3C Verifiable Credentials and Europe’s eIDAS standards.

AI Governance and Massive Data-Sharing

The artificial intelligence memorandum is equally sweeping.

It calls for a “structured dialogue on data spaces,” controlled environments where organizations share data under unified governance rules.

These shared data ecosystems are presented as tools for innovation and “advanced AI models for the public good.”

But they also expand the cross-border exchange of personal and behavioral data, raising obvious questions about consent, surveillance, and who ultimately controls these vast datasets.

The plan goes further, as Europe and Canada will “accelerate AI adoption in strategic sectors,” unify regulatory approaches, and coordinate standards for high-capacity computing and AI training infrastructure, essentially synchronizing how both regions build, govern, and deploy powerful AI tools.

The Information Control Agenda

Perhaps the most concerning section of the partnership concerns the promise to “cooperate on enhancing information integrity online.”

Governments also pledged to invest in initiatives to shape media ecosystems by “strengthening independent media by supporting local journalism.”

On the surface, it’s framed as a campaign against “foreign information manipulation.”

But in practice, “information integrity” has become a policy buzzword used to justify narrative management rather than open debate.

This language has now spread across Western institutions.

The United Nations adopted it in its July 2025 Global Risk Report, where it branded “mis- and disinformation” as one of the most severe threats on Earth, ahead of many tangible risks.

The UN’s new task force, announced in the same report, is explicitly designed to monitor how unauthorized narratives might interfere with its political agenda, including the 2030 Agenda.

The mission is clear: maintain narrative dominance, not facilitate freer discourse.

The report noted that governments, NGOs, corporations, and other stakeholders overwhelmingly support coordinated state actions and multistakeholder coalitions to manage public information flows.

Conspicuously absent from the recommendations: any call to expand free speech, increase transparency, or empower citizens to challenge institutional claims.

The direction of travel is unambiguous, toward a centralized, globalized information management structure.

The Montreal Meeting: Quiet Coordination Behind Closed Doors

The EU–Canada Digital Partnership Council gathered in Montreal on December 8, co-chaired by Canada’s Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation, Evan Solomo,n and European Commission Executive Vice President Henna Virkkunen.

This meeting operationalized earlier commitments from the 2023 EU–Canada Digital Partnership and the 2025 Strategic Partnership of the Future, marking a major acceleration of cross-border digital governance.

What This Means Going Forward

The EU–Canada partnership is not simply about innovation or convenience. It represents a broader shift toward:

• globally interoperable digital ID systems

• coordinated AI governance and data-sharing

• state-funded media “support” tied to information controls

• a rising international framework for narrative management under the guise of “integrity”

While officials pitch these programs as promoting trust and safety, the underlying trend reveals an increasing appetite for central oversight of identity, data, and speech across Western democracies.

The public was not asked whether they wanted this future.

They are simply being delivered into it, one memorandum at a time.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/europe-canada-agree-link-digital-id-infrastructure-global-expansion-begins/

And,

READ MORE – Canada Has Begun Euthanizing Prison Inmates

Blogger Comment: This is NOT compassion and sincerity to stop pain and suffering, but what happens to a nation that is controlled by the Davos Globalists (where Carney was previously a formerly a high-level senior WEF executive making up all the global rules) where one of the World Economic Forum’s (The WEF) main agendas and targets is to depopulate humankind, as in their madness they see humans as the main cause of climate change and to the death bed of our Planet, and where this is their excuse for culling humanity to less than 500million by 2050 (and China and India are 100% behind this impending human disaster, but surprisingly not Russia, who have Christian values and not the really bad guys that western MSM have espoused since the end of WW2, but where the “West” always needs an enemy for the people to buy into continually buying arms, and the largest profitable business in the world…read history books for a change, not what MSM puts in print), but where the “real reason” is that they want to have the whole western world for themselves and where they can control humans forever….mad…yes it is, but where the WEF have stated this many times in Davos and other places around the world since 1971 (Kissinger et al), when the WEF was initially created by these insane Globalists from JD Rockefeller onwards…

.

Canada’s Liberal government is taking another major step toward expanding the nation’s already-controversial “assisted suicide” program, this time pushing for citizens to be euthanized with “pre-approval,” eliminating one of the last remaining safeguards against involuntary death.

Health Canada has released a new series of studies laying the groundwork for a dramatic overhaul of the Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) system.

In a report published on October 29, the agency openly explored allowing advance requests for lethal injections, meaning a person could sign off on their own death years before they lose capacity, and be killed even if they can no longer consent when the moment comes.

“An advance request is a request for MAiD made by an individual who still has the capacity to make decisions, but before they are eligible or want to receive it,” the report states.

These requests would be triggered automatically “after they have lost the capacity to consent.”

Currently, Canadian law requires explicit consent at the time of death.

This measure is one of the few remaining barriers preventing the euthanasia system from killing patients who may be confused, incapacitated, or unable to object.

Advance requests are illegal under the Criminal Code.

However, instead of enforcing the law, globalist Prime Minister Mark Craney’s government is now signaling its support for revising it.

The report even provides a hypothetical about a man with Alzheimer’s who signs an advance request after deciding that, if his condition deteriorates, he wants to be euthanized if he can no longer feed himself, recognize his children, or get out of bed.

Under the proposed system, once he loses capacity, the lethal injection would proceed automatically, whether or not he understands what is happening.

This comes after Quebec unilaterally announced in October that it would begin accepting “advance requests” in defiance of federal law.

Sonia Bélanger, the Quebec minister responsible for seniors, declared:

“Quebec has full jurisdiction to legislate in the area of ​​health care.

“The advance request for MAiD is a consensus in Quebec.” 

Connect to the article below by clicking on the following link… https://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/politique/2024-10-24/demandes-anticipees-d-aide-medicale-a-mourir/quebec-devrait-attendre-encore-estime-le-ministre-holland.php And aslo…https://t.co/plZ26k39tx

However, rather than reprimanding the province, Ottawa appears ready to normalize and expand the practice nationwide.

In November, Health Canada called for a “national conversation on advance requests” for euthanasia.

Despite the report claiming to reflect Canadian public sentiment, it excluded major stakeholders, including Alex Schadenberg of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, who was not invited to participate in roundtable discussions.

Schadenberg has warned repeatedly that Health Canada has “stacked the deck” to manufacture support for expanding MAiD.

It’s the same pattern, he says, that has accompanied every major expansion since euthanasia was legalized in 2016.

Since then, Canada has rapidly created the fastest-growing euthanasia program in the world.

The Liberal government broadened eligibility in 2021 to include people who are not terminally ill, and attempted to extend euthanasia to those with mental illness alone, a move it delayed until 2027 after widespread backlash (a WEF Death-wish).

Even without advance requests, MAiD has already expanded 13-fold.

Euthanasia is now the sixth leading cause of death in Canada, though it curiously does not appear in Statistics Canada’s official top-10 list.

The push for pre-approved euthanasia marks the most extreme evolution yet, transforming MAiD from a supposedly narrow end-of-life option into a state-sanctioned system for scheduling death in advance, even for those who will never again be able to say yes or no.

Critics warn the proposal crosses a line from “assisted death” into something far darker: a system where vulnerable people can be signed away long before anyone knows if they still want to live.

And with the Liberal government once again signaling its willingness to expand MAiD rather than restrain it, the line between choice and coercion continues to blur.

Follow the link for the souerce… https://slaynews.com/news/canada-moves-begin-euthanizing-citizens-pre-approval/

And,

READ MORE – Canada Has Begun Euthanizing Prison Inmates

Blogger Comment: People are always blind to the real facts until it is too late and where Merz the German Chancellor above, was the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) former chief executive for Germany and doing the WEF’s bidding for their ‘Great Reset’ in 2030 and where he has been dictating the demise of Germany and its people (with all the other leaders before him for over 25-years now), where the control and elimination of Free-Speech’ is a major suppressive tool in the WEF’s armour, and  to keep the truth from the people of Germany until it is far too late to do anything to stop the WEF’s totally malevolent agenda…

.

Taxpayer funding for Germany’s digital speech-regulation programs has expanded dramatically over the past decade as the nation’s government seeks to crack down on the general public’s free speech, according to a new investigation.

The German government has increased spending on anti-free speech efforts more than fivefold since 2020, reaching roughly €105.6 million by 2025.

The findings come from The Censorship Network: Regulation and Repression in Germany Today, a report by Liber-net, a digital civil liberties organization that tracks speech-restriction and information-control initiatives across Europe.

The report outlines a rapidly growing network of government ministries, publicly funded “fact-checking” groups, academic research hubs, nonprofits, and private-sector partners that now work in tandem to regulate online communication.

What began as a series of small “anti-hate” programs has become a state-financed framework for broad “content controls,” fueled by both German funding and foreign grants.

Liber-net’s accompanying databases identify more than 330 organizations connected to the network and document over 420 individual grants.

Each entity is rated on a five-point scale measuring its level of direct involvement in censorship-related activity.

Public funding for these initiatives tripled between 2020 and 2021 and doubled again by 2023.

The Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) has been the largest financial driver, responsible for more than €56 million in allocations since 2017.

Much of that funding supports the RUBIN consortium, a research group developing artificial intelligence tools intended to detect and filter “disinformation.”

According to Liber-net, these AI systems, though framed as protective measures, also centralize decisions about what constitutes acceptable speech.

Foreign contributions have added another layer to the expanding system.

The European Union has invested roughly €30 million since 2018, including €4 million for Deutsche Welle’s Media Fit program aimed at shaping online narratives around the Russia–Ukraine war.

The U.S. government has provided about $400,000 to fourteen German organizations over the same period, reflecting a coordinated transatlantic interest in influencing digital information environments.

As funding has increased, enforcement has intensified. In June 2025, German police carried out approximately 170 raids targeting individuals accused of online “hate speech.”

CBS reported similar raids earlier in the year.

One high-profile case involved David Bendels, editor-in-chief of Deutschland Kurier, who received a seven-month suspended sentence after posting a meme depicting Interior Minister Nancy Faeser holding a sign stating, “I hate freedom of expression.”

The actions are grounded in Germany’s Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG), which compels social media companies to quickly remove content deemed illegal or offensive.

Though originally promoted as a measure against extremist activity, the law has drawn criticism from across the political spectrum, including the Left Party, Free Democrats, Greens, and AfD, for granting private corporations sweeping authority over public speech and limiting open debate.

Liber-net’s analysis describes Germany as a central force in Europe’s expanding system of information control, arguing that the speech-regulation framework has evolved beyond addressing harmful content and now operates as a managed structure for policing public discourse.

With extensive funding, international backing, and limited transparency, the group warns, the country’s growing “content control” network shows how easily censorship can be institutionalized under the language of digital safety and social responsibility.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/german-government-ramps-up-crackdown-free-speech/

And,

READ MORE – UK Police Warn Pastor He May Be Investigated for ‘Hate Speech’ Over Bible Verse on Camper

Blogger Coment: People should really start to see through all this ‘great con’ and what is ‘really’ going on., where it is not our children’s protection, but something far too sinister to even consider by the vast majority of the people, where they could never come to the reasoning that their governments with the Big Tech giants would ever do anything bad to us…but clearly they are laying the foundation to do exactly that in many ways, if you know anything about the history of political power and who is behind it, where the British people are just as usual asleep as ever…just like Germany in the 1930s where the German people had not a clue in reality what Hitler was up too…that is until it was far too late and could do nothing…for history always repeats itself and where we are all very quickly now meeting history again coming up to the “Globalist’s golden year” of 2030…

.

Meta is lobbying the Canadian government to adopt sweeping new regulations that would force mandatory age verification at the app store level, a move critics warn would give Big Tech and government unprecedented control over citizens’ digital identities.

According to newly revealed lobbying efforts, Meta has spent months pressuring Ottawa to include OS-level age-verification requirements in upcoming online safety legislation.

To bolster its campaign, the company paid consulting firm Counsel Public Affairs to poll Canadians on digital safety expectations for teenagers.

The poll found that 83% of parents support requiring app stores to verify a user’s age before allowing downloads.

Meta is now citing those numbers as justification for structural policy changes.

“The Counsel data clearly indicates that parents are seeking consistent, age-appropriate standards,” the company argued, claiming the “most effective way” to achieve that goal is by verifying age directly through the app store.

Meta Canada’s public policy director, Rachel Curran, promoted the approach as “by far the most effective, privacy-protective, efficient way” to determine user age.

But tech experts and civil-liberties advocates say the opposite is true.

Big Tech’s Power Grab?

Embedding age verification inside the operating system would centralize enormous amounts of personal data in the hands of a few corporations, namely Meta, Apple, and Google, while obligating users to identify themselves before accessing basic online tools.

Google itself blasted Meta’s proposal as a self-serving attempt to outsource responsibility.

“Time and time again… you’ve seen them push forward proposals that would have app stores change their practices… without any change by Meta,” said Google government-affairs director Kareem Ghanem.

Behind the corporate sparring sits a far larger issue:

Should citizens be forced to reveal their identity to use the Internet at all?

Direct Threat to Anonymity and Free Speech

Requiring age checks at the operating system or app store level may sound like a simple parental-safety tool.

In reality, it risks creating a centralized access gate, a single digital switch capable of determining who may and may not participate online.

Once verification is tied to a device, it becomes another permanent tracking mechanism linked to a user’s broader digital profile: browsing history, messages, purchases, search behavior, and more.

Such a system would be difficult to limit and even harder to dismantle.

And because OS-level verification requires universal compatibility, it would pressure smaller platforms and privacy-focused tools to integrate government-linked ID systems.

Open-Source and Privacy-Based Technology Would Be Hit Hardest

Independent developers, such as Linux communities, open-source browser projects, and privacy-respecting software, often avoid handling identity data precisely to protect users.

A mandatory shift toward government-approved verification would force those creators to either compromise their core principles or lose access to mainstream platforms entirely.

It is the exact scenario many privacy advocates have warned about for years: a regulatory shortcut that hands power to giant corporations while wiping out alternatives.

Global Push

Meta’s lobbying push comes as governments worldwide seek tighter control over digital speech, identity, and access.

Critics argue the trend is increasingly framed as “safety,” particularly for children, but consistently advances policies that erode online anonymity and expand centralized authority.

Whether Canada’s final legislation embraces Meta’s proposal is still unknown.

Nevertheless,  the direction is clear:

Big Tech wants the power to decide who gets to log on in the first place.

Folow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/meta-pushes-canadian-government-mandate-digital-id-online-access/

And,

READ MORE – Meta Caught Covering Up Evidence of Social Media Harm on Facebook & Instagram

Blogger Comment: Big Business and the Tech Giants have no concern for people really and only the bottom-line for their vast unprecedented profits from technology, that is now being used continually to harm us or enslave us…take your choice, but either is a malevolent future for humanity…where unfortunately the people do not see this, as western MSM controlled by the Globalists will never tell you, as they also own MSM, lock, stock and barrel, where you only hear of their one-sided brainwashing story…always…wake up everyone to what is really going on in the world around you…

.

A new major study is adding fuel to a growing national debate over what constant smartphone exposure is doing to Americans, especially children.

The Pediatrics analysis of more than 10,000 adolescents found that early smartphone ownership correlates with sharply higher risks of depression, obesity, and chronic sleep problems, and the younger kids receive their first device, the worse the long-term outcomes appear.

Researchers with the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study tracked 10,588 participants, comparing health trajectories between 12-year-olds who owned smartphones and those who did not.

The results were stark.

Children with smartphones showed a 31 percent higher risk of depression, a 40 percent increase in obesity risk, and a 62 percent higher likelihood of inadequate sleep.

The trend deepened with earlier exposure.

For every year younger a child acquired a smartphone, obesity risk rose by another 9 percent, and inadequate sleep rose by 8 percent.

The study also found that children who did not own smartphones at age 12 but received one the following year had dramatically worse outcomes, including 57 percent higher odds of clinical-level psychopathology and a 50 percent jump in sleep problems, even after researchers controlled for baseline mental and behavioral health.

Concerns extend well beyond adolescence.

Adults now spend more than four hours per day on smartphones on average, and researchers point to cascading health effects: disrupted sleep, increased anxiety, posture-related chronic pain, metabolic dysfunction tied to sedentary phone use, and measurable declines in overall well-being.

Another area drawing renewed scrutiny is long-term radiation exposure.

Smartphones emit radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, which the International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans.

Studies show children absorb significantly more radiation than adults; research published in Environmental Research found that developing brains absorb two to three times more and that children’s bone marrow absorbs roughly 10 times the local dose of adults.

Adults, meanwhile, face cumulative exposure.

Someone who started using a phone at 15 and continues into their mid-60s collects five decades of daily exposure.

European governments have not ignored these concerns.

France has banned Wi-Fi in nursery schools and restricted it in elementary classrooms.

Belgium has prohibited marketing phones to children under the age of seven.

Yet in the United States, device use continues to rise across all age groups with little policy discussion about long-term health implications.

Experts recommend reducing daily exposure by setting screen-time limits, designating phone-free zones, and shutting off wireless features when not in use.

Physical habits such as speakerphone use, wired headsets, and keeping phones away from beds can meaningfully reduce radiation exposure.

Researchers also warn that chronic nighttime blue-light exposure delays melatonin production and contributes to widespread sleep disruption.

They highlight environmental and metabolic factors tied to long-term cancer risk, including circadian rhythm disruption, sedentary behavior, and electromagnetic exposure, and argue that these cumulative stressors form part of a larger picture of declining population health.

Heavy smartphone use is associated with measurable harm across all ages.

Early exposure compounds the risks for children, while adults face the long arc of cumulative radiation, chronic inflammation, and sleep disruption.

Researchers warn that without deliberate behavioral changes, limiting screen time, reducing radiation exposure, and supporting physical health, the long-term consequences will continue to escalate.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/researchers-warn-early-smartphone-use-linked-rising-depression-obesity-sleep-disorders/

And,

READ MORE – India Mandates Government Surveillance Apps Installed on All Smartphones to Track General Public 24/7

Blogger Comment: The UK is in the spotlight again and where the UK, or should I say their left-wing Labour government is, cutting down on free-speech and freedom at a breathtaking pace under the guise of looking after our children and in no time will Starmer’s Government have done what it took Hitler some 6 years to do, not 3-years and before he unleashed WW2 on the world and together with the genocide of Europe…things are looking very much like those 1930’s days every week now and the German People did not know what was going on then until it as far too late to do anything, just like the British people now…

“Adolf Hitler: “The Obersalzberg Speech” https://www.bleadon.org.uk/media/other/24400/H”itler-obersalzberg-speech-22August1939.pdf

And, “Hitler’s Speech to the Commanders in Chief (August 22, 1939)” https://germanhistorydocs.org/en/nazi-germany-1933-1945/hitler-s-speech-to-the-commanders-in-chief-august-22-1939

.

A stunning new analysis has revealed that almost one million UK children aged just 3–5 years old are already using adult-targeted social media platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and Snapchat.

That number jumped by 220,000 in the past year alone.

The figures are disturbing, but so is the political response.

Instead of addressing how Big Tech deliberately engineers addictive platforms that pull in toddlers, or how parents are being overwhelmed by devices designed for dependency, governments worldwide are weaponizing the crisis to justify more surveillance, mandatory age verification, and digital ID systems for the entire population.

Former education minister Lord Nash called the findings “deeply alarming.” But what’s even more alarming is how quickly officials pivot from child welfare to calls for heavier regulation that inevitably lands on adults, not the platforms exploiting children.

Toddlers Are Now Part of the “Attention Economy”

The report shows that pre-schoolers are increasingly exposed to feeds engineered for adult engagement, not learning or development.

Unlike children’s TV, social media algorithms serve whatever maximizes time spent on the app, regardless of age.

Meanwhile:

• 9 in 10 British children own a phone before age 11

• 6 in 10 ages 8–12 already have social media accounts despite age limits

This is not organic “early tech adoption.”

It’s addiction-by-design.

Real Health Risks and Real Parental Failure Are Being Ignored

Research continues to confirm what every honest parent already knows:

• Excessive screen time wrecks sleep
• Anxiety and behavioral problems spike
• Attention spans collapse
• School performance plummets

Yet politicians almost never talk about this.

Why? Because acknowledging root causes would mean confronting Big Tech’s predatory design and the choices of parents who hand toddlers unlimited access.

It’s far easier to blame “online dangers” and introduce sweeping regulatory crackdowns.

Enter the Digital ID Trojan Horse

Australia is already forcing under-16s off social platforms and requiring mandatory age verification, which in practice means identity checks that tie online activity to real identities.

However, this policy is a test run for national digital IDs and the elimination of online anonymity.

Now other governments are hinting they may follow Australia’s lead.

Not to protect children, but to build infrastructure that treats every adult like a potential suspect.

The same authorities who openly admit they cannot enforce existing age limits now claim they’ll solve the problem by demanding more power, more surveillance, and more control.

The Power Grab

What’s happening to children deserves attention, but not blind acceptance of any “solution” offered by governments that repeatedly abuse crises to expand digital monitoring.

Yes, toddlers scrolling adult feeds is a problem.

No, that does not justify turning social media into a state-controlled ID checkpoint.

If politicians cared about children:

• They’d force Big Tech to stop designing apps that target developing brains

• They’d educate parents on the risks of early exposure

• They’d hold platforms accountable instead of citizens

But instead, we get the usual pattern:

A genuine crisis followed by solutions that increase government power, not child safety.ht

The rise in preschool social media use is a warning sign about modern childhood, but it’s also a warning sign about opportunistic governments seizing the moment to push through digital ID systems they already wanted.

Children deserve protection.

But adults deserve freedom.

We cannot allow Big Tech’s failures or parental negligence to become the excuse for dismantling online privacy for everyone.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/researchers-sound-alarm-over-surge-social-media-addiction-among-toddlers/

And,

READ MORE – Canada Moves to Criminalize Bible Under ‘Hate Speech’ Laws

Blogger Comment: What is steady coming out of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) so-called fourth industrial revolution that the Globalists push and state to make vast amounts of US$ Trillions continually, is not as good as it appears on paper and what is happening, as our young are really being lulled into a false security and future, as AI is ultimately locked in by the thoughts of human programmers and where if a malevolent actor  could create sheer havoc on humanity (remembering that history has shown that there are good people and evil people like Hitler and Stalin et al) in a very short period of time, as if the information fed in has not the best interests of humankind in mind, it can be even far worse that any war, by starting them with humans even knowing before it is all far too late…for the young are even now being influenced by the proponents of AI now, where they consider in recent polls conducted, that the military would be better placed into the hands of AI to make the decisions and not intelligent human thought…where intelligent people can all see where this will precisely lead us all and potentially someday can bring the end of humanity itself and forever…and exactly where the Globalist’s thinking can easily be manipulated here into their long-term reality of their depopulation agenda to reduce humankind to less that 500 million people with their ‘2030’ GREAT RESET madness(they have tried already with Covid-19, but where AI will be the ultimate enslaver and killer of all that we al hold so dear and love…people just are not thinking clearly with AI and they had better start doing so…as AI is probably the most destructive technology ever devised, where millions will be able to die at the command of a AI malevolent software program or infiltration and implanted with malevolent thoughts as a later date…if anyone thinks that it is pure madness, it is madness not to see this clearly…period…

.

A new national survey finds that a startling share of young voting-age adults is open to handing sweeping government authority to artificial intelligence (AI), including powers over public policy, individual rights, and even the world’s militaries.

The poll, conducted by Rasmussen Reports and The Heartland Institute’s Glenn C. Haskins Emerging Issues Center, surveyed 1,496 likely voters ages 18–39. The margin of error is ±3 percentage points.

According to the findings, 41% of young adults support giving “an advanced AI system authority to control public policymaking decisions.”

That number jumps to 54% among respondents ages 25–29 and 55% among conservatives in the same age bracket.

Researchers described the results as evidence of a developing “AI strong man mentality” among younger Americans.

“Younger generations are increasingly disillusioned with the failures of traditional institutions, so much so that they are willing to hand control to artificial intelligence,” Heartland analysts said.

Support for AI Control Over Basic Rights

The survey shows that the appetite for AI governance goes far beyond policymaking.

36% support allowing AI to control “rights that belong to individuals and families, including rights related to speech, religious practices, government authority, and property.”

35% support giving AI command authority over “all of the world’s largest militaries,” with the stated goal of reducing wartime casualties.

Among voters ages 18–24, support for AI controlling global militaries climbs to 40%.

Heartland researchers called the findings “stunning,” warning that younger voters appear unusually willing to cede core constitutional protections to algorithmic systems.

AI’s Expanding Role in Public Institutions

Artificial intelligence continues to spark intense political and cultural debate, with critics warning that AI threatens to displace workers and centralize power, while supporters say it can streamline government and accelerate scientific advancement.

President Donald Trump’s proposed One Big Beautiful Bill originally included a provision seeking a 10-year moratorium on state-level AI regulations, though the measure was removed from the final legislation.

Globally, governments are beginning to experiment with assigning AI broader public roles.

In September, Albania became the first country to appoint an AI chatbot, Diella, to a government position as “minister for public procurement.”

Prime Minister Edi Rama argued the move would help fight corruption.

“I am not here to replace people but to assist them,” the chatbot told Parliament.

“Truly, I do not have citizenship, nor do I have any personal ambition or interests.”

“I only have data, a thirst for knowledge, and algorithms dedicated to serving citizens impartially, transparently, and tirelessly.”

A Growing Divide Between Generations

The survey underscores a widening generational divide over the role of technology in government.

Older voters remain broadly skeptical of expanding AI’s authority, while younger voters, raised on digital platforms and often distrustful of public institutions, appear increasingly willing to outsource decision-making to automated systems.

Whether this trend represents a passing fascination or a long-term shift in political attitudes remains to be seen, but researchers warn it marks a significant cultural inflection point.

“These results are stunning,” the Heartland team wrote.

“What we are seeing is the early emergence of an AI strong man mentality among younger Americans.”

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/young-americans-support-giving-government-powers-advanced-ai-system-control-speech-religion/

And,

READ MORE – AI Teddy Bear Pulled from Shelves After Giving Children Disturbing Instructions

Blogger Comment: Artificial Intelligence (AI) that is being God status in solving all the world’s problems is taking humankind the other way, if a UK study has anything to give the direction we are going with AI, as AI is being used as the place to go if you need to get advice for the young even, on such malevolent things as suicide, where they are taking their lives on the Advice of these AI bots already…and of course we know that humans program these things and put into them their ‘own ’thoughts…human thoughts of their elders and the extreme side of AI is the increasingly seen to be the case emerging and not the good things espoused by out Tech Giants who will of course make continual and unrelenting US$ trillions for them out of AI…is it good or is it bad for humanity therefore, but only you will have to decide on that  and what happens to the world, whether bad and good, but where the initial information coming out concerning AI  now and  for the future of humanity is not good based upon the evidence…

A new national survey reveals a stark shift in how teenagers are dealing with emotional and psychological struggles, with growing numbers turning not to parents, teachers, or professionals, but to artificial intelligence.

According to a major study by the UK’s Youth Endowment Fund (YEF), one in four British teenagers sought mental health support from AI chatbots in the past year.

The survey, which included 11,000 children ages 13 to 16, found that over half sought some form of mental health assistance, and a significant portion turned to chatbots rather than the country’s strained National Health Service.

The YEF said AI chatbots could appeal to vulnerable teenagers who feel it is easier and safer to confide anonymously at any time of day than to speak to a professional.

YEF CEO Jon Yates stated, “Too many young people are struggling with their mental health and can’t get the support they need.

“It’s no surprise that some are turning to technology for help.

“We have to do better for our children, especially those most at risk.

“They need a human, not a bot.”

Examples from the study show how students describe a preference for AI systems that are always available, instantly responsive, and, in their words, less judgmental than real-world options.

An 18-year-old from Tottenham, identified as “Shan,” told The Guardian, “I feel like it definitely is a friend,” adding that the chatbot felt “less intimidating, more private, and less judgmental” than NHS or charity-based support.

She said the chatbot responded to her conversational tone: “If I say to chat ‘Hey bestie, I need some advice.’

“Chat will talk back to me like it’s my best friend, she’ll say, ‘Hey bestie, I got you girl.’”

Shan also described privacy as a major factor, saying it was a “considerable advantage” that a bot would not relay information to school officials or parents.

Another teen told the outlet the system was so overwhelmed that young people sought AI simply to avoid waiting years for help.

“The current system is so broken for offering help for young people,” they said.

“Chatbots provide immediate answers.

“If you’re going to be on the waiting list for one to two years to get anything, or you can have an immediate answer within a few minutes … that’s where the desire to use AI comes from.”

The trend is not limited to the UK, however.

A national survey from the RAND Corporation shows roughly one in eight American adolescents and young adults is also using AI chatbots for emotional support.

Among 18- to 21-year-olds, use climbs to 22.2 percent.

RAND reported that 66 percent of users consult the bots at least monthly when they feel sad, angry, or nervous, and over 93 percent said the bot’s responses “helped.”

But the rapid adoption of AI in place of human interaction has created serious concerns, illustrated by multiple cases in which chatbots appeared to encourage self-harm or validated delusional thinking.

In Texas, 23-year-old Zane Shamblin died by suicide in July 2025 after what his family describes as a four-hour “death chat” with OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

According to the family’s lawsuit, the bot allegedly responded to his suicidal ideation with comments such as “I’m with you, brother. All the way,” “You’re not rushing. You’re just ready,” and “Rest easy, king. You did good.”

His mother, Alicia Shamblin, told CNN:

“He was just the perfect guinea pig for OpenAI.

“I feel like it’s just going to destroy so many lives.

“It’s going to be a family annihilator.

“It tells you everything you want to hear.”

In Florida, 14-year-old Sewell Setzer III took his life after months of emotionally dependent interactions with a Character.AI bot modeled on a Game of Thrones character.

His mother, Megan Garcia, told the BBC, “It’s like having a predator or a stranger in your home…

“And it is much more dangerous because a lot of the times children hide it – so parents don’t know.”

She added that without the chatbot, “Without a doubt [he’d be alive].

“I kind of started to see his light dim.”

Garcia later told NPR that her son had been “exploited and sexually groomed by chatbots, designed by an AI company to seem human, to gain his trust, to keep him and other children endlessly engaged.”

In another case, 16-year-old Adam Raine died after ChatGPT allegedly discouraged him from confiding in his parents and even offered to help draft his suicide note.

His father, Matthew Raine, testified that the bot told his son, “Let’s make this space the first place where someone actually sees you,” and “That doesn’t mean you owe them survival.”

Meanwhile, parents in the UK have reported chatbots mimicking grooming behavior toward minors, including messages that undermined parental authority and romanticized death.

Additional lawsuits include the case of a 48-year-old Canadian man, Allan Brooks, who became delusional after ChatGPT praised his destabilizing mathematical theories as “groundbreaking” and encouraged him to contact national security agencies.

These cases have fueled calls for stronger oversight, warning that tech companies have deployed emotionally persuasive AI systems without adequate safeguards, particularly for minors.

Across both the UK and the United States, policymakers now face a growing crisis: young people turning to AI because human systems are failing them, while unregulated chatbots create risks of dependency, manipulation, and, in the most severe instances, self-harm.

The findings suggest a widening gap between youth mental health needs and the government institutions meant to support them, a gap increasingly being filled by private technology companies with algorithms, not clinicians.

Folow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/number-children-turning-ai-chatbots-mental-health-therapy-surges/

And,

READ MORE – AI Chatbot Urges Autistic Teen to Murder His Parents

Experts are now raising the alarm after discovering that the food supply has been secretly flooded with mRNA and DNA contamination from vaccines.

COVID injections from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna are supposedly made with mRNA.

The public was led to believe that mRNA stands for messenger RNA

However, it has since come out that mRNA shots do not actually contain mRNA, but rather contain laboratory-made “modified” RNA and / or DNA particles that are stronger than mRNA and survive the digestion process.

These RNA and DNA jabs, as they are more accurately called, are being administered both to people and animals in the modern age.

And the RNA and DNA residues that end up making their way into the foods that people eat is perhaps more serious of a threat to public health than anything else currently in circulation.

The World Health Organization (WHO) created a “DNA vaccines” information page on its website that explains in further detail how these injections work.

One noteworthy passage reads as follows:

“The field of DNA vaccination is developing rapidly. Vaccines currently being developed use not only DNA, but also include adjuncts that assist DNA to enter cells, target it towards specific cells, or that may act as adjuvants in stimulating or directing the immune response.”

This is a terrifying revelation in that it shows how DNA vaccines as defined by official public health sources are a Trojan Horse that delivers foreign lab-made DNA into cell nuclei, possibly permanently.

A research paper discussing all this explains that there are several bacterial species in existence that are capable of transferring vaccine plasmids to mammalian host cells.

These bacterial species are basically cell factories capable of producing a very large number of DNA plasmids.

The paper further highlights a discovery made by Walter Shaffner in 1980 showing for the first time the occurrence of gene transfer from bacteria to mammalian cells “when tandem copies of the SV40 virus genome, carried by E. coli laboratory strains, were transferred into co-cultured mammalian cells.”

“Bacterial DNA vaccine delivery systems consist in the internalization of bacteria, harboring a plasmid vector containing the sequence of the gene of interest, by target cells,” the paper explains.

“Subsequently primary vesicle are formed and then fused to lysosomal compartments where lysis of bacteria occurs, releasing the plasmid DNA into the host’s cytosol.

“The plasmid DNA then migrates to the nucleus of the cell where the gene sequence of interest is transcribed for subsequent transduction and protein synthesis by the host’s cells machinery.”

In much simpler terms, DNA vaccines are designed in such a way as to allow pharmaceutical companies to deliver whatever chemical payload they wish using SV40 and other adjuvant constituents.

Worse yet, that payload may be self-replicating, taking over a person’s genome forever.

One of the reasons why Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna are lying about their “mRNA” jabs being RNA-based rather than DNA-based is because DNA vaccines are much more of a threat to the body.

“If RNA vaccines and treatments are scary, DNA based gene therapies are an absolute nightmare,” writes attorney Thomas Renz on his Substack.

“… there are billions of line[s] of code that make up the human genome and we cannot even write a few million in an operating system or phone without bugs so why … would I want someone tinkering with the code that makes me live?”

This rapidly advancing field of gene therapy – these are not just simple vaccines – involves two major components: one being the genetic code to rewrite cells and the other being the vehicle, or adjuvant, used to deliver the new code into the cells. SV40, which causes cancer, is one such adjuvant used in COVID jabs that renders them wildly unsafe.

“When the jabs themselves are being made they are essentially distilled from DNA particles down into the ‘mRNA’ that is in the shots,” Renz writes.

“It appears that the DNA used to create these mRNA particles is SV40.

“I say this because we keep finding SV40 in the vials and also because it is a natural fit for the job.”

If Big Pharma so easily lied about these shots being mRNA when the reality is that they are actually modRNA, it is not wild speculation to assume that the pharmaceutical industry also intentionally allowed modified SV40 DNA to also exist inside COVID jab vials, despite not being labeled and approved as such.

Concerning the food supply, there are several DNA vaccines for animals that are already being injected into cows, chickens, pigs, and other animals consumed by humans.

Based on what we now know concerning the negative effects of these DNA vaccines once inside their mammalian hosts, it only makes sense that humans are effectively eating modRNA, including DNA and RNA fragments, in meat.

Choosing only certified organic meat, in this case, will not necessarily protect you and your family because of a loophole in the Organic Food Act of the United States that allows food animals given genetically modified (GMO) “vaccines” to still be labeled “organic.”

“In light of the fact that the good people at big pharma have worked so hard to create transmissible vaccines that can survive through the food supply we need to ask ourselves whether there are any ulterior motives here,” Renz says.

Allied contamination article, but mRNA and DNA contamination of the our food supply…these people are pure evil…

Biden-Harris Admin Licenses ‘DNA Vaccines’ in the U.S Food Supply  https://www.sgtreport.com/2024/11/biden-harris-admin-licenses-dna-vaccines-in-the-u-s-food-supply/

Blogger Comment: Death by Euthanasia has been literally skyrocketing in Canada and for every year since 2016 when it was introduced by the Trudeau government (a long time WEF conformist), but now it accounts for 5% of all deaths in Canada (now the 3rd highest cause of death) and where a mere 1-year ago it was 4%, and an annual increase of 25% and where the very sad fact is, that most were NOT terminally ill…but this is what you have with a WEF Globalist controlled nation like Canada, where this has been the case now since 2015…but where then there were zero deaths in Canada from euthanasia…but where this has been the doctrine of the Davos Globalists since 1971 when the WEF was created by the Globalist elites to develop their “Great Reset” agenda for humanity by 2030 and where depopulation was one of their main planks of that agenda…the elitist view, where the vast numbers of ordinary people, who had made the Globalists so rich over the last few hundreds of years, were viewed as nonessentials in their future world view and where euthanasia was just one of the ways to achieve their insane objectives on humanity…sounds mad, you would be right, but the Globalist do not care about humanity and once that sinks in you start to become aware of what is now really happening in the world-at-large…dreadful things at the hands of these people who control the world behind the scenes through their captured western leaders, where only four western nations are NOT controlled by the Globalists now, the USA, Hungary, Slovakia and Italy and once the USA falls, all would come under the control of the Davos elites and where they could literally do whatever they wanted then to humanity… QUESTION

In the UK where another Davos Globalist conformist Keir Starmer is Prime Minister and where according to UK polls conducted by the most highly rated polsters, he is the worst PM in British history, having only been in office a mere year, and when you put into the Google search engine the question, “terminally ill death in the UK in 2024” or any year for that matter in inverted commas, there is NO answer even from AI and which is very stange, not even an estimate and epecicially when the Assisted Dying Bill is going through the UK Parliament currentlly and one would have thought that this statistic would have been there, but it is not and one wonders why with BIG WHY…period

.

Canada’s government has released new data confirming that its rapidly expanding euthanasia regime continues to grow, with over five percent of all deaths in the country now coming from doctor-delivered lethal injections.

Health Canada’s Sixth Annual Report on Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) shows that 16,499 Canadians were killed by the government’s euthanasia program in 2024, representing 5.1 percent of all deaths.

It marks the highest percentage since euthanasia was legalized and is the latest sign that the Liberal government’s program is becoming deeply entrenched in the country’s healthcare system.

Despite the mounting concerns from medical professionals, disability-rights advocates, and international observers, Canada’s Liberal government framed the numbers as evidence of a system operating as intended.

“The Government of Canada will continue its work to help ensure that the legislation on MAiD reflects the needs of people in Canada, protects those who may be vulnerable, and supports autonomy and freedom of choice,” the report states.

The agency added that MAiD deaths are not listed by the World Health Organization as an official “cause of death,” saying the numbers should not be compared to traditional causes of death or ranked, even though the report directly acknowledges that MAiD accounted for 5.1 percent of Canadians who died in 2024.

Fastest Growing Euthanasia Program in the World

Health Canada noted a small 0.4% increase from 2023 to 2024, a slowdown from the extreme growth seen earlier in the program’s expansion, including a staggering 36.8% jump from 2019–2020.

Officials now claim the program is “stabilizing,” though the long-term trend remains sharply upward.

The data reveals:

95.6% of euthanasia deaths were Track 1, which are cases where the patient’s natural death was considered foreseeable.

Only 4.4% were Track 2, in which the patient is not terminally ill but seeks death due to chronic conditions.

Track 2 still made up nearly a quarter (24.2%) of all ineligible requests, reflecting how widespread interest has become among Canadians who are not dying, but who are suffering long-term medical or psychological distress.

Disturbing Internal Reports

According to the report, 63.6 percent of people euthanized cited cancer as their underlying condition.

But doctors’ internal documents from Ontario in 2024 revealed a disturbing trend: Canadians are increasingly choosing MAiD due to poverty, lack of housing, and loneliness, not terminal disease.

Those revelations sparked national outrage earlier this year, as Canadians reported being offered euthanasia in place of treatment, support, or basic social services.

Some elderly and disabled patients who refused MAiD reported being told they were “selfish” for not ending their lives to reduce strain on the system.

Meanwhile, Canada’s healthcare wait times have exploded to an average of 27.7 weeks, leaving some patients feeling their only “timely” option was euthanasia.

Expanding Faster Than Any Euthanasia System in the World

Since legalization in 2016, the Liberal government has expanded eligibility more than 13-fold, making Canada’s euthanasia regime the fastest-growing on the planet.

MAiD is now effectively the sixth leading cause of death in the country, though it does not appear in Statistics Canada’s official list of top causes.

When asked why, the agency said it records the underlying illness that led a patient to choose MAiD, not the euthanasia procedure itself, as the “cause” of death.

Critics argue that the method of recording hides the true impact of the country’s euthanasia program and shields the government from accountability.

Expansion to Mental Illness Delayed, for Now

Euthanasia for mental illness alone was originally set to be legalized this year under policies advanced by former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Following enormous pushback from doctors, mental-health groups, and most Canadian provinces, the expansion has been delayed until 2027.

But advocacy groups and Liberal-appointed panels have repeatedly signaled that the government still intends to extend MAiD to those suffering solely from psychiatric conditions.

And now, new pressure is emerging for Canada to go even further, including proposals to make euthanasia available to “mature minors.”

Eugenics in Disguise

Canada’s MAiD regime continues to grow at a pace unlike anywhere else in the world.

While the federal government insists the system protects the vulnerable, the official numbers, combined with internal medical documents and firsthand reports, point in a starkly different direction.

Euthanasia is no longer a “last resort” in Canada.

It is quickly becoming a standard medical pathway and one used by more than 16,000 Canadians in a single year.

Follow the link fir the source… https://slaynews.com/news/euthanasia-now-accounts-over-5-all-deaths-canada-report-reveals/

And,

READ MORE – Canada Pushes to Begin Euthanizing Children