World Freedom

A new German study has warned that there is a major information gap in the establishment medical industry regarding cases of “post-Covid vaccination syndrome.”

The study was led by Dr. Kerstin Wüstner, a psychology professor at Berlin School of Economics and Law.

Wüstner found that, despite widespread “vaccination” during the COVID-19 pandemic and rising reports of lingering post-vaccine health issues, there is a surprising lack of scientific research on post-Covid vaccination syndrome (PCVS).

While it is commonly referred to as PCVS, the condition has also been referred to as vaccine-induced AIDS or Vaccine-Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (VAIDS).

However, health officials, corporate media outlets, and so-called “fact-checkers” have sought to label reports on PCVS as “conspiracy theories,” leaving patients in the shadows.

Professor Wüstner’s study sought to determine what peer-reviewed research exists on PCVS and assess the broader implications of its apparent absence.

This was a qualitative literature review and critical commentary.

Wüstner conducted a systematic search across four major academic databases—BASE, PubMed, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO.

She used search terms related to PCVS and patient experience.

The final search, completed on September 27, 2024, filtered out articles not directly focused on patient experience related to PCVS.

Non-peer-reviewed public discourse and commentary from online physician platforms (e.g., DocCheck) were also examined for illustrative purposes.

The study adhered to open science standards and was conducted without external funding or institutional bias.

The literature search revealed a striking vacuum: no peer-reviewed studies were found that directly examined the lived experience of PCVS patients in Germany.

This stands in contrast to robust literature on “long Covid,” vaccine safety, and adverse events of special interest (AESIs) such as myocarditis, thrombosis, and autoimmune phenomena.

The Paul-Ehrlich-Institut had received over 1,500 PCVS-related reports.

The reports include references to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), and post-exertional malaise.

However, systematic clinical research on these patients was absent.

Instead, patient voices appeared primarily in the media, where individuals described symptoms such as chronic fatigue, dizziness, autoimmune disorders, neurological dysfunction, and cardiovascular disturbances.

Yet even in the media, coverage was sporadic.

Sleazy “fact-checkers” often pounce on such reports, likely leading to outlets fearing their reputations will be harmed for reporting on these cases.

Public and professional discourse often minimized PCVS or cast doubt on its legitimacy.

Some physicians are even attributing symptoms to psychological factors, hypochondria, or “misinformation.”

Vaccine-injured patients often experienced the action known as gaslighting, a form of psychological manipulation where someone is made to doubt their own sanity, perceptions, or memory.

An analysis of commentary on medical forums revealed a polarized and, at times, stigmatizing atmosphere.

Some professionals simply dismiss PCVS sufferers and those who acknowledge the lack of support patients face.

Despite more than 11,000 German citizens applying for vaccine injury compensation, and 467 cases officially recognized as of early 2024, most remain unresolved or denied.

The disconnect between political rhetoric promoting “vaccine” safety and patients’ lived experience was highlighted as a major driver of distress, alienation, and loss of trust.

Despite widespread reports of adverse events following Covid “vaccination” and thousands of patients reporting persistent symptoms, Germany has failed to produce research on the lived experience of those affected by post-Covid vaccination syndrome.

However, this issue is not limited to Germany, and it has been reflected in much of the scientific world.

This silence represents more than a scientific oversight; it reflects systemic biases, political discomfort, and institutional inertia.

Patients experiencing PCVS often face skepticism, delayed care, and stigmatization, deepening their suffering and undermining public trust.

The implications are urgent.

Without a scientific understanding of PCVS—its frequency, mechanisms, and treatment needs—affected individuals are marginalized, and vaccine safety oversight remains incomplete.

Public health credibility requires not only robust data collection but also the ethical obligation to listen.

Wüstner calls for immediate investment in PCVS research, healthcare infrastructure to support affected patients, and a more transparent and humane public health dialogue.

Follow the Link for the Source of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/german-study-warns-major-cover-up-post-vaccine-syndrome/

And,

READ MORE – South Korea Sounds Alarm as Death Surge Linked to Covid ‘Vaccines’

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has ordered pharmaceutical giants Pfizer and Moderna to issue warnings that their Covid mRNA “vaccines” carry a high risk of heart damage, particularly for young men.

The new guidance highlights the deadly risk of myocarditis from mRNA injections.

Myocarditis is an immune-driven inflammation of the heart muscle, called the myocardium.

The condition can reduce the heart’s ability to pump blood.

Myocarditis can cause blood clots, strokes, cardiac arrest, and ultimately, sudden death.

Doctors have been warning for some time that myocarditis acts as a ticking time bomb, as it’s often symptomless, meaning sufferers may not be aware that they have the condition until it’s too late.

The new ruling from the FDA has sparked renewed scrutiny over Covid “vaccine” safety policies.

According to a report from CBS News, the new guidelines signal growing federal scrutiny of Covid “vaccine” safety.

The FDA has now formally requested that Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech expand age-based warnings about heart damage caused by their mRNA vaccines.

In letters to the Big Pharma companies, the FDA cited recent data on myocarditis and pericarditis (another form of heart inflammation) that link to these conditions to mRNA injections.

Both manufacturers have been ordered to update product labels to reflect increased risk in males ages 16 to 25, up from the current ranges of 12–17 (Pfizer) and 18–24 (Moderna).

The letters were signed by Richard Forshee, acting director of the FDA’s Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance under the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.

The agency’s move follows a 2024 FDA-funded study showing surging myocarditis cases following the second vaccine dose in young males.

The FDA-backed study, published in The Lancet, shows continued abnormalities in heart scans in some patients months after experiencing myocarditis post-vaccination.

The data cited by Forshee shows that nearly 60 percent of patients in a 333-person cohort still exhibited myocardial injury markers five months post-diagnosis.

“The clinical and prognostic significance of these findings is not known,” he wrote.

The new directive requires the vaccine makers to inform patients that the long-term significance of these MRI findings is unknown.

However, the heart abnormalities could reflect unresolved cardiac injury.

The department also emphasized that public awareness of these adverse events must be prioritized across both Pfizer and Moderna mRNA products.

In a statement, a Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson said:

“Americans deserve radical transparency around the safety and efficacy of Covid vaccines, and the FDA is delivering on its promise to do just that.”

The immune-driven condition has prompted fierce debate.

The scale of the crisis was amplified by a recent Senate hearing on “vaccine” safety and dissenting voices within the agency.

Meanwhile, FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and vaccine policy lead Dr. Vinay Prasad announced this week that Covid “booster” recommendations will now be limited to individuals over 65 or those with high-risk conditions.

The new rules continue to further shift the “vaccine” policy landscape.

Follow te Link to the Article…https://slaynews.com/news/fda-orders-covid-vaccine-makers-warn-public-heart-damage-risk/

And,

READ MORE – Global Study: Covid Caused Zero Excess Deaths, mRNA Shots Caused Millions

South Korea is raising the alarm after the nation’s surging excess deaths have been linked to severe adverse events caused by Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The alert was issued after the South Korean government published the findings of a bombshell new study on skyrocketing mortality rates among the Covid-vaccinated.

The study was conducted by leading scientists at the nation’s equivalent of the U.S. CDC, the Gyeonggi Infectious Disease Control Center (GIDCC).

The GIDCC’s Dr. Min Cheol Song led a team of researchers who hypothesized that the mortality rates are soaring among patients who experienced severe serious adverse events (SAEs) following a Covid “vaccination.”

The researchers investigated patients to see if mortality rates differ depending on whether they received a homologous (same vaccine platform) or heterologous (mix-and-match) prime-boost regimen.

The study was titled “Mortality in Severe Serious Adverse Events Following Heterologous and Homologous Prime-Boost Vaccination Strategies for SARS-CoV-2: A Retrospective Cohort Study.”

The results of the study have just been published in the medical journal PLOS One.

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 358 cases of severe SAEs temporally linked to Covid “vaccines” in South Korea’s Gyeonggi Province.

The researchers analysed official government data from February 2021 to March 2022.

Patients were grouped by vaccination strategy: homologous mRNA (n=220), homologous viral vector (n=75), and heterologous vector/mRNA (n=63).

Only patients who had received two or more doses were included.

Severe SAEs were defined as events resulting in death, ICU admission, life-threatening outcomes, permanent sequelae, or predefined adverse events of special interest.

The study assessed 42-day mortality risk and SAE etiology across the three vaccine strategy groups.

Patients in the heterologous group faced a 72% higher risk of death within 42 days of a severe adverse event compared to those who received homologous viral vector vaccines.

This group also showed significantly more deaths from respiratory (40.9%) and genitourinary (13.6%) conditions.

Mortality was lower among patients vaccinated at centralized centers than among those vaccinated at hospitals or long-term care facilities.

Notably, the heterologous group had more underlying conditions, including stroke, thyroid disorders, and chronic kidney disease.

This large provincial dataset reveals an elevated 42-day mortality risk among patients who experienced severe SAEs following heterologous prime-boost vaccination with a viral vector followed by mRNA.

Notably, deaths due to respiratory and genitourinary causes were disproportionately higher in this group.

This finding prompts questions about immunological overactivation or transient immune suppression post-vaccination.

The researchers warn that these findings underscore the need for risk stratification, especially in vulnerable populations like the elderly or those with pre-existing conditions.

While heterologous vaccination has been shown in multiple trials to enhance immunogenicity, this study suggests it may also raise safety concerns for certain subgroups.

Further investigation into biological mechanisms, such as lymphopenia and hyperreactivity, is warranted.

Renowned McCullough Foundation epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher also weighed in on the findings in a post on Substack.

Hulscher warns that the study reveals a “44.7% case-fatality rate within 42 days for serious COVID-19 vaccine injuries.”

He notes that deaths and SRAs are the “highest” in mix-and-match recipients and long-term care patients.

Out of 358 patients who suffered severe SAEs post-vaccination, 160 died within 42 days, yielding a 42-day case-fatality rate of 44.7%.

Breaking down the data by vaccine strategy, Hulscher notes:

• Heterologous “Mix n’ Match” (viral vector + mRNA): 36 deaths / 63 cases = 57.1% mortality
• Homologous viral vector: 34 deaths / 75 cases = 45.3%
• Homologous mRNA (Pfizer/Moderna): 90 deaths / 220 cases = 40.9%

Hulscher also explains that the findings reveal how “vaccine” sites are linked to increased death risk.

Patients vaccinated outside of centralized vaccination centers experienced significantly higher mortality after severe SAEs:

• Medical institutions (e.g., clinics/hospitals):
  • aHR: 2.776 — Nearly 3x higher mortality
• Nursing homes / long-term care:
  • aHR: 4.374 — Over 4x higher mortality
• Community health centers:
  • aHR: 3.945 — Nearly 4x higher mortality

According to this Korean government-backed study, around 45% of those individuals may die within 42 days.

Hulscher notes that the study supports the conservative Covid “vaccine” death estimate of 470,000–600,000 Americans who received a Pfizer mRNA injection.

As Slay News previously reported, the head of Florida’s Department of Health, Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, recently revealed that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccine” killed over 470,000 Americans.

The alarming finding was revealed in Florida’s official data.

Florida’s Health Department collaborated with scientists from the world-renowned Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) to investigate surges in all-cause mortality rates in the state.

The researchers found that Pfizer’s mRNA “vaccine” in particular caused dramatic increases in deaths from all causes, including COVID-19, non-Covid, and cardiovascular.

Alarmingly, the study confirmed that Covid mRNA “vaccines” triggered a global surge in all-cause mortality rates.

The study found that people who got the Pfizer vaccine had a stunning 36% increase in their all-cause mortality when compared to those who received Moderna’s mRNA injection.

This increased risk lasts for at least a year after the “vaccine” was administered.

Yet, this risk was not an increase from the baseline, as all-cause mortality also spiked among those who received the Moderna “vaccines.”

The investigation was a retrospective, matched cohort study involving 1,470,100 noninstitutionalized adult Florida residents.

Follow the Link for the Source of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/south-korea-sounds-alarm-death-surge-linked-covid-vaccines/

And,

READ MORE – Global Study: Covid Caused Zero Excess Deaths, mRNA Shots Caused Millions

Republicans are celebrating after passing a provision that bans the use of taxpayer funds to pay for transgender treatments for adults and minors.

Medicaid will no longer pay for so-called “gender-affirming care” thanks to GOP-led legislation, Newsmax reported.

The “big, beautiful bill” passed in the House on Thursday.

It included the eleventh-hour addition banning federal funding for the controversial transgender surgery and other gender treatments.

An earlier version of the bill prohibited treatments for children under Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program.

It bars these federal programs from paying for hormone treatments, puberty blockers, and bodily mutilations for gender-confused minors.

A manager’s amendment later added to the bill extended the prohibition to recipients regardless of age.

The final bill passed 215-214, with all Democrats and just two Republicans voting against it.

House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris (R-MD) skirted the issue by voting “present.”

Predictably, the Left was not pleased with this provision and its implications.

The passage of this bill already triggered leftists as it codified much of President Donald Trump’s agenda.

However, it’s particularly offensive to people like Caleb Smith, director of LGBTQI+ policy at the Center for American Progress, because of the transgender care issue

Smith claims that the expansion is proof that banning gender affirming care outright was the goal all along.

“The bans on coverage for trans medical care were made so much worse, really, in the eleventh hour of this bill,” Smith said in a statement.

“And what a display of how it’s really not just about youth.

“It’s never just been about youth; It’s always been about curtailing access to medical care and bodily autonomy.

“All they had to do was strike ‘under 18′ from the bill, and now it’s everybody,” Smith went on.

“There’s a wildly strong case for this to be discrimination — it is discrimination.

“It really clearly violates equal protection because what we’re saying, essentially, is that if you are a cisgender man and you want access to testosterone, you can have it, but if you are a transgender man and you want access to testosterone, ‘Sorry, we’re not going to cover that,’” Smith claimed.

This discrimination argument would be credible if the treatments being proposed weren’t about genital mutilation and chemical castration.

There’s no reason these should be part of medical treatments, let alone those paid for by the American people, as some Republicans have pointed out.

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) was the one who pushed through the ban for children after speaking out against it for years.

“The Crenshaw Amendment will become law — and it’s long overdue,” Crenshaw said.

“Gender transition procedures are the lobotomy of our generation.

“So-called ‘gender-affirming care’ isn’t healthcare — it’s fringe science with no proven benefit and massive risks,” Crenshaw asserted.

He touted his addition to the bill in a video posted to X on Wednesday.

“Just a year ago, few believed we could put a stop to the radical gender ideology being pushed on kids—especially the kind masquerading as medicine, funded with your tax dollars,” he said in the caption.

“But now, we’re about to do exactly that.”

Click on the ‘Link’ below the ‘X’ image to view and read, as this image does not work to go directly to the ‘X’…

https://x.com/DanCrenshawTX/status/1925258300104614139?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1925258300104614139%7Ctwgr%5E554b56c9eb183e454c124b1b862efb84018d09a2%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fslaynews.com%2Fnews%2Frepublicans-pass-bill-provision-banning-taxpayer-funded-transgender-treatments-minors-adults%2F

The issue of transgender medicine has been divisive, but limiting government spending on it is long overdue.

These procedures are barbaric and ghastly, and it’s about time someone put the brakes on them, even if it’s just through cutting some of the funding.

Follow the ‘Link’ below for the ‘source’ of the Article…

Republicans Pass Bill Banning Taxpayer-Funded Transgender Treatments for Minors and Adults

And,

READ MORE – Transgender Maniac Who Murdered a Baby Blames Trump for ‘Transphobic’ Attacks in Prison

(Blogger Comment: These Globalists like Carney and Trudeau are literally insane and the sooner people recognise this and what the WEF puppets really are, the safer the world will become and be in the future…fact not fiction…)

The globalist Canadian government has launched a campaign to promote a new push to begin euthanizing children with mental health issues without their parents’ consent.

The new scheme seeks to open up the country’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) to children.

Liberal Party Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government describes those children who would be eligible for “assisted suicide” using the alarmingly vague term “mature minors.”

According to the Canadian government’s promotional material, children with mental health issues would be euthanized without parental consent under the expanded laws.

The move to expand the eugenics programs to “mature minors” was revealed in flyers distributed by the Canadian government.

Jasmin Laine, the host of “Over Opinionated,” shared the flyers on social media that are being circulated in Manitoba.

In a post on X, Laine wrote:

“You have to be a special kind of demonic to advocate for MAID for young, vulnerable people and people who are suicidal.

“Imagine walking into a clinic for help, and being told the world would be better off without you… that you should cave to the lies the devil on your shoulder is telling you, and it would be more affordable for Canada’s healthcare system if you were gone.”

Laine has herself participated in “recovery plans and treatment after trying to end it” after her partner of ten years committed suicide.

“There is nothing compassionate about this—it is pure evil,” she concluded her post.

The flyers explain that the government of PM Carney, a World Economic Forum (WEF) “agenda contributor,” (but a lot higher than that, as he was a member of the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum (WEF) until January 2025 and is even more manevolvent than the Trudeau against humanity…which says a great deal more about the ‘fear’ we should have for Carney the Globalist puppet, just like Trudeau) and has recommended that citizens deemed “mature minors” must be allowed to qualify for euthanasia.

“A mature minor is a child or teen who is deemed capable of making a decision for MAiD,” the paper states.

“This would essentially remove the minimum age of eligibility.

“The [government] committee also suggested parents may not be consulted and wouldn’t need to consent to their child’s death via MAiD.”

However, the vagueness of the term “mature” could open up the scheme to children of all ages.

The flyer goes on to argue that, according to the Canadian government, killing children without parental consent is an example of protecting the most vulnerable citizens.

“Children are uniquely vulnerable,” the informational pamphlet says.

“Canada’s first priority must be to provide high-quality medical care for children.”

Click on the link below the X Image to view and read…

Click on the “Link” below to view… https://x.com/JasminLaine_/status/1924486812883366302?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1924486812883366302%7Ctwgr%5E0eb7a21a99f54d511ff93863e5a10c60e1ca157c%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fslaynews.com%2Fnews%2Fcanada-begin-euthanizing-children-without-parental-consent%2F

Beginning in March 2027, the government will begin euthanizing Canadians suffering from mental illnesses.

Continuing to bizarrely invert reality, the pamphlet states:

“Hopelessness and a desire to end one’s life can be a symptom of some mental illnesses.”

The flyer continues by promoting suicide as a faster alternative than waiting for medical treatments.

Essentially, the government is advising citizens that suicide is more efficient than the Canadian healthcare system.

“One in 10 people will wait more than 4 months for counselling,” the document reads.

“The waiting period for MAID is only 3 months.

“We are already hearing about people asking for MAID because they do not have the support needed to live.”

The Dying With Dignity Canada (DWDC) website notes that, currently, “Canada’s law on medical assistance in dying (MAiD) requires that applicants must be 18 years of age or older.”

“In many jurisdictions across Canada, mature minors already have the right to make important decisions regarding their healthcare.”

“Dying With Dignity Canada believes mature minors should be allowed the right to choose MAiD,” the site continues.

Next, the website cites a 2023 Ipsos poll claiming that “71% of people across Canada support the ability for mature minors to request and be considered for MAID, if all other criteria are met under the law.”

This troubling push by the Canadian government highlights the anti-human agenda being pushed by the globalist ruling class.

Follow the link for the ‘source’ of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/canada-begin-euthanizing-children-without-parental-consent/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Government Admits Deaths Surged Among ‘Boosted’ Citizens

In a landmark ruling, a U.S. federal court has declared that influenza vaccines cause Guillain-Barré Syndrome, an incurable and life-threatening neurological disorder.

The ruling was issued by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.

The court sided with Alan Lien of Wisconsin, who had suffered life-changing injuries caused by a flu shot.

Lien was awarded $500,000 in damages for his vaccine-induced injury.

It marks a significant ruling under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).

The judgment follows Lien’s diagnosis of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS).

The court determined that Lien’s GBS was caused by a flu shot received in October 2019.

Represented by attorney Randy Knutson of the Knutson Casey Law Firm, Lien filed his petition in October 2021.

The Vaccine Court ruled in February 2023 that Lien was entitled to compensation.

A final settlement, agreed upon in March 2025, provides a lump sum payment to cover damages.

Lien received compensation for lost income after he was forced to leave his job as a Frito-Lay driver due to the condition.

“This decision acknowledges the serious, life-changing impact of GBS and helps provide much-needed support to Mr. Lien,” said Knutson.

The VICP was established in 1986.

The program is funded by a federal excise tax on vaccines.

The VICP serves as a no-fault alternative to traditional legal action for vaccine-related injuries.

Cases are adjudicated by the Vaccine Court in Washington, D.C.

The news comes amid growing safety concerns about “routine” flu vaccines.

Following a major study, the world-renowned Cleveland Clinic recently confirmed that influenza vaccines are ineffective at preventing flu cases and only increase the risk of harm.

The verdict on the flu vaccine from the Cleveland Clinic’s large-scale prospective cohort study has delivered a shocking blow to the mass vaccination agenda.

The study found that not only was the vaccine ineffective, but it was also associated with a significantly increased risk of infection.

The findings of the study led by Dr. Nabin Shrestha, the head of the Cleveland Clinic’s Departments of Infectious Diseases, were published in the MedRvix journal.

The study tracked over 53,000 employees during the 2024–2025 respiratory viral season.

The researchers sought to assess whether the influenza vaccine offered protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza infections.

The results raise serious questions about this season’s flu vaccine and the broader assumptions behind annual mandates.

In addition, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. warned in March that people who receive flu “vaccines” are “4.4 times more likely” to suffer a non-influenza infection.

Kennedy asserted that, after reviewing the official data, he wouldn’t get a flu shot “in a million years.”

While raising the alarm, Kennedy cited a bombshell Pentagon study by Wolfe.

The study revealed that those vaccinated against the flu were “36% more likely to get coronavirus.”

Follow the Link for the Source of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/federal-court-flu-vaccines-cause-guillain-barre-syndrome/

And,

READ MORE – Global Study: Covid Caused Zero Excess Deaths, mRNA Shots Caused Millions

Dr. James Thorp, a highly respected obstetrician and gynecologist, has testified before the United States Senate on the surging miscarriages he’s seen among women who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

Thorp testified that the number of miscarriages has now spiked so dramatically that he likens the Covid injections to “chemical abortion drugs.”

The doctor had been called to testify as an expert witness on the adverse events caused by mRNA “vaccines.”

Thorp is a board-certified OB-GYN and maternal fetal medicine specialist with over 44 years of clinical experience.

As a U.S. veteran and widely published physician, he has testified internationally and served as a peer reviewer for leading medical journals.

He is a board member of the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine and an examiner for the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In an opening statement before the Senate, Thorp asserted that it is “difficult to conceive of a more egregious breach of medical ethics by the government-controlled medical-industrial complex than the promotion of COVID-19 vaccines to pregnant women.”

“This campaign was not accidental,” said Dr. James Thorp.

“It was calculated. Pregnant women were targeted deliberately.”

He explained that this was done to persuade the American people that the Covid mRNA “vaccine” was “safe and effective.”

If pregnant women “could be convinced that the vaccine was safe and effective, it would imply that it was safe and effective for everyone,” he noted.

“From the outset of the pandemic, this vaccine campaign was never grounded in biological science, but rather in behavioral science, specifically the manipulation of public perception through influence, fear, and persuasion,” said Thorp.

“The federal government outsourced much of this psychological operation to NGOs, which disseminated emotionally-charged and misleading messaging.

“These entities falsely assured pregnant women that the vaccines were proven safe and essential for maternal and fetal newborn health despite the fact that early evidence indicated quite the opposite.”

Dr. Jay Winston, an initiative director at Harvard’s School of Public Health, expressed the same view in a 2020 CBS News interview.

The government’s “vaccine” marketing strategy was to “go for the low-hanging fruit, those easiest to pick and harvest,” according to Dr. Winston.

“And the ‘fruit,’ tragically, were pregnant women,” he added.

Thorp cited a misleading study published in April 2021 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The study claimed the miscarriage rate was 12.6 percent.

However, Thorp disclosed that “the raw data revealed an 82% miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during the first trimester.”

“This figure mirrors the effects of chemical abortion drugs such as RU486,” Thorp shockingly noted.

Thorp asserted that “publications were riddled with conflicts of interest and deliberate misrepresentations intended to coerce pregnant women into taking vaccines.”

“These publications are fundamentally compromised by serious conflicts of interest, ranging from biased funding sources and institutional mandates, and even threats to their medical licenses and board certifications,” he continued.

“Between 2020 and 2022, pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at leading medical journals — The New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, Lancet, and BMJ — thus corrupting the peer review process.”

“Conversely, countless independent researchers with no conflicts of interest published findings that contradicted the false narratives and the pharmaceutical industry narratives, only to be rewarded by persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications,” said Thorp.

“This is not hypothetical. It happened to me,” he said.

“This catastrophic public health failure was financed with taxpayer dollars and channeled through federal agencies to medical gatekeepers such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine.

“These organizations have abandoned their ethics and responsibilities to physicians and patients and must be held accountable,” he insisted.

“I urge the government to immediately halt all funding to these entities and to end every promotional campaign that coerces or recommends experimental mRNA therapies to pregnant women.

“This must stop now,” he concluded.

WATCH: Click on the “weblink” below the image below to access the video…

Top Doctor Testifies on Surging Miscarriages: Covid ‘Vaccines’ Are ‘Chemical Abortion Drugs’

Thursday’s Senate hearing on Covid “vaccine” adverse events was chaired by Senator Ron Johnson (R–WI).

The hearing coincided with the publication of Johnson’s interim Senate report.

The report accused former President Joe Biden’s administration officials of having been well aware of multiple major risks associated with the injections.

However, Biden officials “opted to withhold issuing a formal warning to the public for months about the safety concerns, jeopardizing the health of young Americans.”

“The full extent of the Biden administration’s failure to immediately warn the public about all COVID-19 vaccine adverse events must be completely exposed,” declared Johnson’s report.

Follow the Link for the Source of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/top-doctor-testifies-surging-miscarriages-covid-vaccines-chemical-abortion-drugs/

And,

READ MORE – Global Study: Covid Caused Zero Excess Deaths, mRNA Shots Caused Millions

A world-renowned data expert has dropped explosive new evidence confirming the link between Covid mRNA “vaccines” and global mass deaths.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) computer scientist Dr. Steve Kirsch, the founder of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF), used advanced artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to identify the cause of surging global excess deaths.

Kirsch, the inventor of the optical computer mouse, used the algorithms to produce an all-cause mortality analysis method.

This novel, simple method proves that Covid mRNA “vaccines” killed far more people than they saved, Kirsch revealed.

During an interview on the Alex Jones Show, Kirsch explained that his analysis shows that the “safe and effective vaccine” narrative is false.

Instead, he said Covid mRNA injections have killed millions of people around the world.

Kirsch noted that pharmaceutical companies are “killing people” with their “vaccines.”

He argued that Big Pharma executives should not “get a pass” when it comes to criminal charges.

“You can’t just look away like that when people are telling you that your product is murdering people,” he noted.

“That is indefensible.”

Kirsch referenced his data while responding to the explosive Senate hearing on Covid “vaccine” safety that has been taking place this week.

Several leading experts have testified about the unprecedented harms caused by the mass “vaccination” campaign.”

He noted that Democrat Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) produced charts during the hearing showing “how many lives that the Covid virus had killed.”

“And the second chart behind [Blumenthal] is ‘How many lives the Covid vaccines have saved.’

“This is like blatant propaganda that is completely false,” Kirsch declared.

“It’s very shameful.”

“The guy needs to be brought up on charges at Nuremberg 2.0,” Jones added about Blumenthal.

WATCH: Click on te link below the ‘image snip’ below….

MIT Scientist Drops Bombshell Evidence Linking Covid ‘Vaccines’ to Global Mass Deaths Surge

Kirsch also noted that Blumenthal is “not acknowledging the vaccine harms, or that it’s caused any deaths at all.”

Jones added that the senator is a “certified fraud.”

Later in the interview, Jones explained:

“We’ve got government numbers out of Europe, government numbers out of New Zealand,” showing surging all-cause deaths and injury among young people.

“Then we see overall mortality worldwide exploding – This isn’t even like a signal, this is the Ten Commandments written in stone,” he added.

Kirsch noted that his method proves these death surges are caused by Covid injections.

He notes that his method can also be used to prove that “vaccines cause autism.”

FULL INTERVIEW:

GLOBAL BOMBSHELL: Using Advanced AI Algorithms, Renowned Tech Inventor & COVID Expert Steve Kirsch Reveals Incontrovertible Evidence That The COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Have Caused Mass Death & Illness

Kirsch Also Responds To The New Senate Report & Hearings That Document How The… pic.twitter.com/i1VtaGhygI

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) May 22, 2025

Kirsch published his “super simple, amazingly powerful method” on his Substack:

You pick a start of study date (e.g., when 70% of your population (which you divide up into same age groups, e.g., born in 1950-54) has been vaxxed) which defines who is in the intervention vs. control groups. Next, your look for a time period after the start date when no external stress relative to the intervention is present, e.g., the 3 months just after June 1 in the Czech Republic when there was no COVID). You start cumulating event counts at that point in each cohort to establish a relative baseline rate in the two groups while under normal external stresses.

This start date for cumulation will ideally be as close to the start date as possible, e.g., the same as the study start date.

Now all you do is plot the Ratio of (cum intervention events) / (cum control events) on the y-axis vs. time and look at the slope. The observation time period should include times when the external stress is applied so our two counters reflect the differential outcome response in the two cohorts. The slope of a line drawn between the cumulative ratio at the start of observation time till the end of observation time (typically 1 year later but could be any time period of interest where the external common mode stress is “supposed to” produce a differential outcome count, i.e., ACM deaths per week lowered in the vaxxed v. unvaxxed) tells the story of benefit or harm:

Slope up—> vaccine is clearly killing people. Flat slope —> no change. Slope down —> net mortality benefit.

There are two caveats to be aware of if you are dealing with a vaccine intervention *AND* your outcome is DEATH:

1. If there is a healthy vaccinee effect (HVE) observed in the two raw event count lines vs. time (it appears like merging traffic lanes that are later parallel and is very obvious), you must start count accumulation when the lanes have been merged. Below is what it would look like if present (it isn’t present in our dataset since most people were vaxxed way before the start point). Typically, you’d only see this in real life if you are looking at time series data where the deaths are relative to the time of the shot. See these Medicare time series death plots for the COVID vaccine showing the effect is gone 30 days post shot and is exponentially declining in impact (deaths rise quickly at t=0, slower as t increases and you’re at actual mortality by t=30 days or earlier). The slopes post that time are due to seasonality impacts (look at ALL the graphs and you’ll see that), not “long term HVE” which there is no such thing. See also the Pneumococcal vaccine curve (Medicare 2021 all ages) showing the HVE effect is gone in ~14 days.
2. If there is a non-negligible absolute negative slope in the control group, you need to subtract that slope from the answer which will alway reduce the harm or increase the benefit. This adjusts for the depletion effect in the unvaccinate cohort which behaves (mortality wise) like a group of people 10 years older than the age group you are looking at. So it always applies to cohorts of age 75 or older due to the depletion effect (older people’s absolute weekly mortality becomes comparable or greater than their annual increase in baseline mortality).

“That’s it!!! Simple and objective,” Kirsch said of his method.

“You can calculate confidence bounds from the 4 numbers in the ratio using the normal methods.

“You can shift the observation start time and window size to show you that the result is robust.”

Follow the Link for the Surce of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/mit-scientist-drops-bombshell-evidence-linking-covid-vaccines-global-mass-deaths-surge/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-newsletter

And,

READ MORE – Renowned Oncologist: Covid ‘Vaccines’ Caused Deadliest Cancer Crisis in History

Blogger’s Comment: This is what the Globalists in Davos have done and our EU political leaders are covering up for them, as they have been captured and bought and sold before they were elected, just like Starmer before he became prime minister, where he was at the Davos Annual Conference and openly stated in a high power interview that he was a Davos man, not a Westminster man… “”Davos or Westminster?” Starmer: “Davos” – https://rumble.com/v26nmnl-davos-or-westminster-starmer-davos.html

Germany has just issued an alert after recording surges in non-Covid deaths across Europe among people who received mRNA “vaccines.”

The alarming findings were revealed following an investigation into skyrocketing excess deaths, which spiked globally after the Covid “vaccines” were rolled out for public use in early 2021.

The major peer-reviewed study was conducted by Dr. Günter Kampf of the University Medicine Greifswald in Germany and Maarten Fornerod of the Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands.

The results of the study were published in the Journal of the Academy of Public Health.

During their study, the researchers analyzed publicly available mortality data from England.

The researchers confirmed that elevated age-adjusted non-COVID-19 mortality rates are soaring dramatically among individuals who received mRNA “vaccines” compared to the unvaccinated.

The study presents temporal patterns and dose-related mortality spikes that link Covid mRNA injections to surging excess deaths observed across Europe since 2021.

According to Kampf and Fornerod, Covid “vaccines” have caused an estimated 12.3 million global deaths so far.

Using mortality and vaccination data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) in England covering April 2021 to May 2023, the researchers conducted an exploratory, non-pre-registered analysis comparing non-COVID-19 death rates among unvaccinated individuals and those vaccinated with one to four doses (with each dose given at least 21 days prior).

The study standardized mortality rates by age group but lacked adjustments for critical covariates such as comorbidities, socioeconomic status, and sex.

The authors used the unvaccinated group’s non-Covid mortality as a baseline, assuming that COVID-19 vaccination should not significantly affect mortality from unrelated causes.

Their goal was to investigate whether any consistent, dose-dependent, or age-related mortality patterns could be detected outside of COVID-19-specific deaths.

The study found that non-COVID-19 mortality was consistently higher across nearly all age groups following dose 1, especially among the elderly.

The largest spikes were up to 5.7-fold increases compared to unvaccinated counterparts.

These larger spikes occurred shortly after the “vaccine” rollout in mid-2021 among individuals aged 60 to 89.

Similarly, after dose 2, soaring mortality rates reappeared, notably in the winter of 2021–2022.

The death surge correlated perfectly with the second wave of “vaccine” campaigns.

Among younger adults aged 18–39, the study observed a sharp increase in non-Covid mortality after dose 4.

Among young people who received four doses, deaths were up to 16.7 times higher than their unvaccinated peers.

This finding raises major concerns despite this group’s typically low baseline mortality risk.

Across all groups, the timing of mortality spikes tracks closely with “vaccine” rollout schedules.

Importantly, these trends were not mirrored in COVID-19-specific mortality, especially before the emergence of the Omicron variant.

However, the “vaccine” didn’t appear to have any impact on COVID-19 deaths, with the researchers finding little difference between the “vaccinated” and unvaccinated groups.

This discrepancy deepens the mystery.

It confirms that COVID-19 does not explain the rising mortality patterns.

The news comes after another startling discovery recently emerged from Germany.

As Slay News recently reported, a group of leading German scientists raised the alarm in March after discovering evidence buried in the German government’s official data that confirms excess deaths were caused by mRNA “vaccines” and not Covid.

The bombshell study provides yet further confirmation that excess mortality rates did not rise during the first waves of the pandemic, despite official claims of surging “Covid deaths.”

Excess mortality rates did skyrocket, however, but only after the Covid mRNA “vaccines” were rolled out for the public.

Interestingly, the study found that the most significant excess mortality event during the pandemic period was not caused by Covid at all but by a late 2022 influenza wave.

Excess deaths spiked due to people dying from the flu after they received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

In addition, Canada also recently confirmed that Covid mRNA “booster” shots triggered a surge in deaths among people who received the “vaccines.”

As Slay News reported, the Canadian government’s admission was made in a report from the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC).

In a parliamentary response, the PHAC’s report reveals that deaths spike dramatically in individuals who were “boosted” with a third and fourth Covid mRNA “vaccine.”

Citizens who were “boosted” suffered far higher mortality compared to the unvaccinated, the PHAC response reveals.

Follow the link for the source of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/germany-covid-vaccine-deaths-surging-across-europe/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-newsletter

And,

READ MORE – Top HHS Medical Advisor Blows Whistle: mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Cause Cancer

The scientific community has been left stunned after a group of leading scientists presented evidence showing alarming physiological mutations among people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The explosive findings of the new study were presented to scientists at the 2025 American Physiology Summit.

The breakthrough research was led by Dr. Sarwat Amin and colleagues from Purdue in collaboration with physIQ Inc.

Dr. Amin and her team uncovered early evidence that Covid mRNA “vaccines” produce distinct patterns of nervous system and inflammatory response.

The chilling mutations were revealed in data from wearable sensors tracking heart rate variability (HRV).

The research has exposed measurable changes in activity in the autonomic nervous system, which regulates heart rate, digestion, and inflammation.

The scientists believe these changes could be responsible for physiological injuries that lead to sudden cardiac arrests and other severe adverse events.

The findings of the study have been published in the American Physiological Society journal.

Using chest-worn wireless devices (VitalPatch RTM), researchers tracked heart rate variability (HRV), skin temperature, and activity levels in two small participant subsets (10 and 20 people each).

The participants were monitored after their second dose of a Covid mRNA “vaccine.”

They grouped participants based on their skin temperature response and whether they experienced systemic side effects like fever, chills, or fatigue.

By mapping three-dimensional HRV changes (including high, low, and very-low frequency components) over 72 hours, they generated a tool they call 3D HRV cartography.

The tool creates a dynamic physiological fingerprint of post-Covid “vaccine” response.

Those who experienced “vaccine” side effects showed distinct HRV patterns compared to those who didn’t.

The findings suggest that immune reactions can be objectively tracked via the autonomic nervous system.

The algorithm achieved up to 80% accuracy in distinguishing “vaccine” responders from non-responders using unsupervised machine learning.

Crucially, the HRV changes were negatively associated with inflammation.

This data reinforces that sympathetic-parasympathetic imbalance may be part of the inflammatory cascade post-vaccination.

The researchers warn that these vaccine-related autonomic shifts are likely responsible for life-threatening injuries, such as autoimmune disorders, cancers, and heart damage, all of which have soared among the Covid-vaccinated.

The news comes after a group of world-renowned American doctors and scientists issued a warning after alarming new data emerged revealing “molecular chaos” in people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The warning was issued earlier this week during a new interview featuring bioscientist Dr. John Catanzaro, cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, and epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH.

During this groundbreaking discussion, the leading experts present new molecular data on patients impacted by Covid mRNA “vaccination.”

The data was uncovered during a joint investigation by Catanzaro’s Neo7Bioscience and the University of North Texas Genomics & Biodiscovery Institute.

The alarming findings of the study have exposed a concerning pattern of biological disruption.

The results support mounting evidence of reverse transcription, immune destabilization, and tumor-promoting gene dysregulation in mRNA-injected individuals.

During the interview, the experts warn that the findings are evidence that the Covid mRNA “vaccines” are behind surging cases of aggressive cancers and devastating immune system collapse.

Meanwhile, a world-renowned toxicologist has warned that millions of people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines” have been impacted by a devastating injury, including himself.

The chilling warning was issued by the associate professor of pharmacology and toxicology at the University of Western Australia, Dr. Phil Burcham.

In a blistering critique published in the May 2025 edition of the journal Quadrant, Burcham raises urgent questions about the chemical design and safety testing of Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The top professor notes that his own debilitating trigeminal nerve injury was caused by a Covid mRNA “vaccine.”

Follow the Link for the Source of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/heart-rhythm-data-exposes-alarming-physiological-mutations-among-covid-vaxxed/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Government Begins Testing Inhaled Covid mRNA ‘AeroVax’