The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has announced plans to finally publish federal government data on the deaths linked to Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
On CNN’s “The Lead,” FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary stunned viewers by pledging a forthcoming federal report that will explicitly state how many deaths were caused by the mRNA injections.
Makary said the report will be based on interviews with families, autopsy reviews, and physician adjudication.
He confirmed that there have been unprecedented child deaths linked to vaccination, a claim the report is meant to verify.
It comes as Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is pushing federal agencies for accountability.
As such, Makary’s announcement landed like a bombshell.
If the report is rigorous, it could reset public trust.
For years, Americans were told that Covid shots were “safe,” “effective,” and “essential.”
However, the real risk-benefit assessment shows that the injections were more dangerous than the virus itself, especially among young, healthy adults and children.
The National Academies reviewed nearly 600 studies in 2024.
Their findings admitted a clear causal link between mRNA “vaccines” and the deadly heart condition myocarditis, mostly in young males, while dismissing other harms as unproven or lacking sufficient evidence.
Studies have varied in their estimates, but the myocarditis risk signal remains.
Government surveillance has consistently shown spikes in heart inflammation among young men shortly after their second dose.
According to federal data, the FDA’s BEST program pegged myocarditis incidence in 2023–24 at around 8 per million overall, and as high as 27 per million in males aged 12–24.
Most cases were described as “mild,” but the agency itself recently tightened product labeling to acknowledge the danger.
Children, meanwhile, overwhelmingly faced only mild to moderate illness from Covid itself, with most experiencing no symptoms at all.
What hasn’t been admitted publicly, until now, is whether “vaccination” caused the global surges in deaths.
VAERS, the federal reporting system, logs every post-vaccine death by rule.
However, the database is notoriously underreported, recording only a fraction of vaccine-related deaths and injuries.
In addition, much of the published data shows deaths “reported after” a Covid injection, rather than logging “caused by” the shot.
Nevertheless, Makary promised a tally of confirmed vaccine-caused deaths.
That distinction, moving from “reported after” to “caused by,” could be seismic.
In France, the Covid shot is only recommended for people over age 80 and high-risk. In the UK, it's age 75 and high-risk.
Beware of medical elites claiming absolute consensus when in fact the U.S. has been an international outlier. pic.twitter.com/04FAo8SsED
Three explosive, peer-reviewed studies have just delivered what leading researchers are calling “irrefutable grounds for immediate market withdrawal” of the Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
Nicolas Hulscher, a world-renowned epidemiologist with the McCullough Foundation, is sounding the alarm over the bombshell findings.
Hulscher declared that global scientific evidence has now converged:
“mRNA injections are unsafe, ineffective, contaminated, and in violation of international law,” Hulscher warned.
The first study, titled “COVID-19 Injections: Harms and Damages, a Non-Exhaustive Conclusion,” identified shocking violations of the Biological Weapons Convention.
Researchers found engineered elements in the injections alongside evidence of widespread system damage:
Immune: viral reactivation, autoimmune disease, cancer acceleration
The second study, titled “Regulatory and Safety Assessment of COVID-19 mRNA-LNP Genetic Vaccines in Japan: Evidence for Revocation of Approval and Market Withdrawal,” focused on Japan, where 103 million people were injected without nationwide safety investigations or long-term monitoring.
The authors concluded that the Covid shots were “misclassified as vaccines” rather than gene therapy products, allowing them to bypass stricter regulatory standards.
The paper documents legal and ethical breaches, including concealment of harms, suppression of mortality data, and approvals granted without full clinical trials.
Mounting Global Evidence
These two new papers confirm the conclusions of an earlier landmark report published in Science, Public Health Policy and the Law by Hulscher, Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, and Dr. Peter McCullough.
That study warned the risks of Covid mRNA injections “far outweigh theoretical benefits.”
The numbers paint a grim picture.
VAERS-adjusted estimates suggest over 589,000 deaths in the U.S. alone linked to the shots, with the global toll exceeding 17 million deaths.
Meanwhile, the global scientific and medical community is mobilizing.
More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, and researchers, along with 240 elected officials and 17 public health organizations, have formally demanded that the vaccines be pulled from the market.
Hulscher declared the findings leave no room for doubt:
“Together, these three studies converge on the same conclusion: Immediate global withdrawal of COVID-19 mRNA injections is essential to prevent further loss of life,” he said.
“Now is the time to stand on the right side of history – or be remembered by future generations as complicit in one of the greatest tragedies of our time.”
The warning from Hulscher follows an explosive whistleblower statement earlier this week.
As Slay News reported, a pharmaceutical industry whistleblower has spoken out to allege that a world-renowned professor, Dr. Francis Boyle, was murdered shortly before he was due to testify before a Dutch court that Covid mRNA “vaccines” were developed as deadly “bioweapons.”
As Slay News previously reported, Boyle, a bioweapons expert, wrote the 1989 Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, which was passed by Congress and signed into U.S. law in 1990 by President H. W. Bush.
Boyle, who was one of the most prominent law professors in the world, declared last year that “everyone involved” in pushing Covid mRNA shots onto the public committed “crimes against humanity.”
During an interview last summer, Dr. Boyle asserted that the “frankenshots” were part of a plan to conduct “medical experimentation” on humanity.
He warned the public that COVID-19 was developed in a lab as “an offensive biological weapon.”
Professor Boyle argued that those who pushed the mRNA injections “clearly violated the Nuremberg Code.”
Speaking during an interview with reporter Maria Zeee, Boyle declared that vax pushers are guilty of “murder” for causing deaths through “vaccine” injuries.
“Everyone involved in the development of COVID-19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon and also everyone involved in the manufacture of these COVID-19 ‘frankenshots’ clearly violated the Nuremberg Code on medical experimentation,” Boyle said.
“It was a Nuremberg crime and a crime against humanity.”
Boyle died unexpectedly in Urbana, Illinois, on January 30, 2025, at the age of 74.
Now, a whistleblower has alleged that Boyle was murdered to prevent him from testifying on Covid “vaccines” in the Netherlands.
During a recent interview with journalist Liz Gunn and UK politician Jim Ferguson, retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova raised fresh alarm over the sudden and “suspicious” death of Dr. Boyle.
She noted that he died suddenly just after he had committed to testify in court that the Covid injections are bioweapons.
Meanwhile, the World Council for Health (WCH) has just made an explosive and historic move by officially declaring that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are “biological and technological weapons of mass destruction.”
The bombshell declaration was announced by the global health organization’s Florida wing.
As Slay News has previously reported, the first-of-its-kind bill seeks to criminalize and outlaw the use of mRNA technology under existing state bioweapons laws.
In its official declaration, WCH FL stated:
“mRNA nanoparticle injections are biological and technological weapons of mass destruction that have caused a massive amount of disease, disability, and death, and without intervention, this will continue into the foreseeable future.”
A bombshell report commissioned by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is set to expose key drivers behind America’s autism crisis, with the MMR vaccine and Tylenol use during pregnancy emerging as major culprits.
The forthcoming HHS report, according to sources, will identify low folate levels, acetaminophen use, and childhood vaccination as contributing factors to the skyrocketing autism rates now devastating families nationwide.
Kennedy previewed the findings during a Senate hearing on Friday, citing a buried U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study.
The study revealed a staggering 260% higher rate of autism in boys who received the MMR vaccine on time.
“There is not a single cause, there are many, many — there’s an aggregation of causes,” Kennedy told Fox & Friends last week.
“We are now developing sufficient evidence to ask for regulatory action on some of those, or recommendations.”
WATCH:
🚨 JUST IN: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says the Trump administration is about to reveal the true causes of AUTISM and take REGULATORY ACTION on them. FINALLY.
"This is a crisis, there is not a single cause, there are many, aggregation of causes. We are now developing sufficient… pic.twitter.com/C5EOgjCEey
In 1970, fewer than one in 10,000 children were diagnosed with autism.
Today, according to the CDC, one in every 31 Americans carries an autism diagnosis. Even if some cases are overdiagnosed, Kennedy stressed, the majority of children are severely impaired.
“Most cases now are severe,” Kennedy explained earlier this year.
“Twenty-five percent of the kids who are diagnosed with autism are non-verbal, non-toilet trained,” and exhibit self-harming behaviors like hand-banging.
Whistleblower Exposed CDC Data Destruction
During his Senate testimony on Friday, Kennedy revisited a disturbing scandal involving CDC officials who allegedly destroyed evidence linking the MMR vaccine to autism.
“In 2002, CDC did an internal study of Fulton County, Georgia, children,” Kennedy explained.
“The data from that study showed that black boys who got the vaccine on time had a 260% greater chance of getting an autism diagnosis than children who waited.”
“The chief scientist on that, Dr. William Thompson, the senior vaccine safety scientist at CDC, was ordered to come into a room with four other co-authors by his boss, Frank DeStefano … in order to destroy that data.”
Thompson later came forward as a CDC whistleblower, confirming that the 2004 study had intentionally omitted the alarming data showing a strong correlation between timely MMR vaccination and autism diagnoses among black boys.
‘An Epidemic Caused by Environmental Toxins’
Kennedy insists that while genetic predisposition may play a role, the evidence overwhelmingly points to environmental factors, including vaccines and pharmaceuticals, as the trigger for what he calls a full-blown epidemic.
“It is an epidemic,” Kennedy said.
“Epidemics are not caused by genes.
“Genes can provide a vulnerability, but you need an environmental toxin.
“We know that it is an environmental toxin that is causing this cataclysm, and we are going to identify it.”
He vowed that HHS will “look at vaccines, but we’re going to look at everything.
“Everything is on the table — our food system, our water, our air, different ways of parenting, all the kinds of changes that may have triggered this epidemic,” RFK Jr. said.
The release of the HHS autism report is expected to ignite a firestorm.
It comes as Kennedy pushes for sweeping reforms and accountability measures that could challenge decades of government and pharmaceutical industry denials.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said during a Senate Finance Committee hearing on Thursday that the previous administration of Joe Biden manipulated abortion pill safety data.
This manipulation is resulting in an apparent 22 times higher risk for serious complications than had been reported, Kennedy explained.
During questioning by Sen. James Lankford (R-OK) on the Trump administration’s health care agenda, the ongoing safety review of mifepristone, the first drug in a two-drug abortion regimen used by most women who seek abortions, was addressed.
In April, a study was released that showed nearly 11%, or one in nine women who take mifepristone, have a complication serious enough to seek emergency medical care.
Those complications included sepsis, infection, hemorrhaging, and other adverse events occurring within 45 days following the abortion.
Lankford pointed out that since Biden loosened the restrictions on abortion pills in the wake of Roe V. Wade’s overturning, “there’s all kinds of issues that are happening now on it.”
The abortion drugs are now available without a prescription to make them easier to get, except when state laws prohibit them.
“So the question was: you’d said that there would be a review on that, just to be able to look at it, to make sure we’re following all safety protocols,” Lankford asked.
“Do you know a timing on that review?”
Kennedy said the review was “progressing apace,” according to FDA Commissioner Marty Makary.
“We’re getting data in all the time, new data that we’re reviewing,” Kennedy said.
“And we know that during the Biden administration, they actually twisted the data to bury one of the safety signals with a very high safety signal around 11 percent,” he alleged, referring to the April study.
“So we’re going to make sure that doesn’t happen anymore.
“We’re producing honest science and gold standard science on that.
“I’ll keep you abreast of where we are.”
The new study looked at more than 865,000 pill abortions that used mifepristone and were done between 2017 and 2023.
Kennedy called the study results “alarming” when he was questioned about them in May.
The use of abortion drugs has increased dramatically in recent years.
Back in 2017, 39% of all abortions were done with medication, but in 2023, the most recent year data was available, 63% of abortions were done with medication.
That doesn’t even account for abortions outside the U.S., or in cases where the pills were obtained through underground networks in states where they are banned.
Mifepristone works by blocking the action of progesterone, which causes the unborn child to die of starvation inside the womb.
The second drug, misoprostol, then causes contractions so that the unborn child is expelled.
A team of Japan’s leading medical experts is calling for an immediate ban on Covid mRNA injections and experimental self-replicating “replicon” saRNA “vaccines” as excess deaths and deadly diseases continue surging among the “vaccinated” globally.
The renowned scientists are warning that these products were rushed to market without proper testing.
Dr. Jun Ueda, joined by renowned
oncologist Dr. Masanori Fukushima and other top Japanese scientists, is sounding the alarm as the “vaccines” are now linked to a surge in excess deaths, injuries, and deadly diseases worldwide.
The team has published a blistering critique of how regulators approved and sustained Pfizer, Moderna, and the self-amplifying mRNA vaccine ARCT-154 (marketed as Kostaive) in Japan.
In their paper, the team says these injections were approved under traditional vaccine rules that skipped the kind of rigorous studies normally required for gene-therapy products.
They argue that the shots should have undergone advanced trials, including biodistribution, genotoxicity, and long-term risk evaluations.
The scientists warn that the so-called “vaccines” should never have been authorized under such lenient standards.
As a result, they are demanding that the injections be withdrawn from the market immediately.
The paper identifies five critical failures by regulators and health officials:
Regulatory gaps: Covid genetic shots were treated like conventional vaccines despite behaving more like gene therapies.
Crucial long-term safety testing was never conducted.
Lack of transparency: Japan’s own adverse-event tallies documented surging cases of myocarditis and sudden deaths, but after 2021, public reporting was scaled back.
Most cases were written off as “indeterminable,” with very few autopsies performed.
Effectiveness in question: Data reviewed by the advisory board showed no lasting protection.
In fact, some records suggested higher infection and severity rates among the more heavily “boosted.”
Platform risks: Japan’s new self-amplifying saRNA “vaccine” (Kostaive) was approved merely for being “not worse” than mRNA shots.
However, this means that regulators were effectively rubber-stamping the same dangers.
Early post-marketing deaths have already been reported, yet the rollout continues.
Policy remedy: The authors conclude the evidence is overwhelming and demand that all mRNA and saRNA shots be pulled from the market immediately pending an independent review.
Yet, despite all of the major concerns, the red flags were ignored.
The scientists warn that regulators deliberately avoided classifying these shots as gene therapies, which would have forced deeper safety evaluations, stricter surveillance, and longer-term follow-up.
They also note glaring data access problems: age- and sex-stratified safety reports that were once available disappeared after 2021, leaving independent researchers unable to fully verify risks.
Most damningly, the experts say the Japanese government approved ARCT-154/Kostaive replicon injections with virtually no platform-specific safety evaluation.
This decision sent shockwaves through the scientific community, considering that the injections are the world’s first mass-deployed saRNA “vaccine.”
Dr. Ueda and the team argue that regulators worldwide, not just in Japan, repeated the same mistakes.
They bowed to political and corporate pressure to push novel, poorly tested platforms onto the public.
This mass “vaccination” has had dire consequences on the global population.
This is not simply a Japanese problem, they argue.
This is a global regulatory failure that has cost lives and will continue to do so unless approvals are revoked.
They point to soaring excess mortality rates among heavily “vaccinated” nations as evidencethat the alarm can no longer be ignored.
While critics will dismiss the findings as controversial, the timing could not be more sensitive.
Canada’s radical euthanasia program has exploded at such a pace that the government is now struggling to find enough doctors willing to carry it “assisted suicide.”
The Canadian government’s eugenics program is officially called Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD).
What began in 2016 as a “compassionate” measure for the terminally ill has morphed into one of the most permissive assisted-death regimes on Earth.
MAiD now accounts for one in every 20 deaths in Canada, surpassing fatalities from Alzheimer’s and diabetes combined.
However, the program shows no sign of slowing down as it’s only rapidly expanding.
Soon, MAiD will also include people suffering only from mental illness.
Disturbingly, the Canadian Parliament has floated plans to begin euthanizing minors.
Initially limited to those near death, Canada’s MAiD law has been widened to cover anyone with a “grievous and irremediable” medical condition.
The language is so broad that doctors have euthanized patients who weren’t dying at all.
Some practitioners have performed hundreds of assisted deaths.
Patient “autonomy” is the justification, framed in the progressive language of equality, access, and compassion.
But critics warn that the program’s rapid growth is blurring the line between voluntary choice and societal pressure. In some tragic cases, Canadians have sought euthanasia simply because they couldn’t afford treatment or disability support.
The demand for assisted death has now reportedly outstripped the supply of clinicians trained and willing to provide it.
Doctors are warning that they can’t keep up with the number of citizens they are expected to euthanize.
Some doctors who embraced MAiD from the start have essentially turned it into a specialty, one that keeps them in constant demand.
Without enough practitioners, patients seeking to end their lives face delays, and advocacy groups are pressuring the government to expand the training pipeline.
This is creating a disturbing paradox as Canada’s healthcare system is struggling to treat the sick, but mobilizing resources to ensure they can die more quickly.
As such, the Canadian government is easing pressureon the socialized healthcare system by killing patients instead of treating them.
At the same time, medical professionals who decided early on to reorient their career toward assisted death no longer feel compelled to tiptoe around the full, energetic extent of their devotion to MAID.
Some clinicians in Canada have euthanized hundreds of patients.
Alarming, some doctors are even boasting about the number of people they have euthanized.
Canada’s MAID expansion has triggered ethical alarm bells worldwide.
Opponents say it’s proof of the classic slippery slope.
The program is moving from terminal illness, to chronic conditions, to mental illness and soon to minors.
In the meantime, the human toll keeps climbing.
Families and faith leaders warn that the system risks normalizing death as a solution to suffering, or even inconvenience, in ways that echo the darkest chapters of history.
As the country barrels ahead, one uncomfortable fact stands out: the euthanasia industry in Canada is growing faster than the ability to staff it.
That’s not compassion; that’s a machine that can’t slow down.
The medical establishment in Canada has crossed another chilling line after a prominent doctors’ group sought to justify calls for the government to begin euthanizing babies with severe health problems.
The Quebec College of Physicians has now declared that euthanasia, rebranded by the Canadian government as “Medical Assistance in Dying” (MAiD), is “appropriate treatment” for infants born with severe deformities or syndromes
In a shocking statement, the group announced:
“The CMQ reiterates that medical assistance in dying may be an appropriate treatment for babies suffering from extreme pain that cannot be relieved and who have severe malformations or serious polysymptomatic syndromes that destroy any prospect of survival.”
The college went further, claiming that “parents should have the opportunity to obtain this care for their infant.”
The statement continued by grotesquely describing infanticide as “care.”
This latest push is not an isolated slip, however.
Since Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government legalized assisted suicide in 2016, Canada’s MAiD regime has rapidly metastasized.
Originally sold as an option for the “terminally ill,” it has since expanded to the chronically ill under Bill C-7.
The government now even plans to begin euthanizing the mentally ill in 2027.
Quebec has been at the forefront of these radical expansions.
In fact, just last year, Alberta MP Damien C. Kurek raised alarms in Parliament after Quebec’s own Louis Roy recommended euthanasia for babies up to 12 months old with “severe deformities and very serious syndromes.”
That was dismissed at the time as an extreme suggestion.
However, the province’s medical college is now openly endorsing it.
The grim reality is that infanticide in Canada is not theoretical; it is already happening in hospitals.
A Quebec study revealed that one in ten babies aborted in the second trimester are born alive.
Of those, only 24% are admitted to intensive care, while most are simply left to die.
Five percent receive palliative “comfort care,” while hundreds more are abandoned without treatment.
In one shocking example, former Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s government refused to investigate Statistics Canada data showing that 491 babies born alive after abortions between 2000 and 2009 were left to die.
Canadian courts have also blurred the line.
In 2011, an Alberta judge dismissed a case of a mother strangling her newborn and tossing the body into a neighbor’s yard as essentially a “late-term abortion.”
And Liberal politicians continue to normalize the horror.
In July, Liberal MP Dr. Hedy Fry even claimed that restricting abortion could put “newborns” at risk.
Fry continued by bizarrely equating abortion with infant healthcare.
Abortion and euthanasia advocates are dismantling every boundary protecting life.
The push to normalize euthanasia for babies is the logical extension of a culture that has long denied the humanity of the unborn.
What begins with late-term abortion ends with open infanticide.
A leading oncologist has drawn attention to a major study that confirmed ivermectin is successful in treating multiple cancers after testing its use against 28 types of the disease.
The groundbreaking study was highlighted by Dr. William Makis MD, a renowned radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher.
The study was led by a team of researchers in Mexico led by Dr. Mandy Juarez.
According to Makis, the study’s paper is not available to the public but a summary can be viewed here.
The 2020 study is titled: “Antitumor effects of ivermectin at clinically feasible concentrations support its clinical development as a repositioned cancer drug.”
Ivermectin was tested against 28 different forms of cancer.
The researchers sought to identify the effectiveness of using ivermectin as a cancer treatment.
The study found that ivermectin was successful in treating all of the cancers it was tested against.
While some cancers were more resistant to ivermectin than others, the drug still proved at least useful and also helped to improve the effectiveness of chemotherapy.
The most sensitive cancer cell lines were:
Ovarian
Breast
Glioblastoma
Lung Cancer
Colon Cancer
Uterine SCC
hepatocellular
breast TNBC
Pancreatic
Endometrial
The least sensitive were:
osteosarcoma
gastric
melanoma
Ivermectin was found to be useful in treating both lymphomas and leukemias.
Although lymphoma and leukemia cell lines appear to be more resistant to Ivermectin, the drug has a significant impact on those cells’ ability to form colonies.
Ivermectin also targets cancer stem cells, which tend to be resistant to chemotherapy:
“Ivermectin has a preferential depletion effect on the cancer stem-like cell population,” the researchers note in their study.
“We observed that among all the evaluated cell lines, a decrease in cell viability and clonogenicity is more evident in the cancer stem-like cells than in their parental population.”
At a human dose of 2mg/kg, Ivermectin can achieve anti-cancer effects such as cell cycle arrest (inhibit proliferation), preferential inhibition of cancer stem-like cells, synergize with several chemotherapy drugs, and inhibit tumor growth in a breast cancer mouse model,” the study found.
Responding to the study, Dr. Makis notes:
“Remember: Turbo cancers caused by Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines are very resistant to chemotherapy.
“Ivermectin can overcome this chemoresistance.
“This is the first study I’ve seen that has tested as many as 28 Cancer types with Ivermectin. Incredible.”
NEW ARTICLE: IVERMECTIN Tested against 28 types of Cancer – which cancers were most sensitive to Ivermectin? Which were least sensitive?
A research group from Mexico investigated Ivermectin in Cancer
— William Makis (McGill Medicine) (@MakisMD) August 26, 2024
Doctors and scientists are continuing to stun the scientific community as the “wonder drug” is now being used to treat a growing list of various ailments in humans.
As Slay News recently reported, ivermectin has been proven as a treatment for cancer, Parkinson’s, Covid mRNA “vaccine” damage, epilepsy, and many other diseases.
According to one study of many, ivermectin can be used to treat:
cancer
myiasis
trichinosis
malaria
leishmaniasis
American trypanosomiasis
schistosomiasis
bedbugs
rosacea
asthma
epilepsy
neurological diseases
HIV
tuberculosis
Buruli ulcer
Further, cancer surgeon Dr. Kathleen Ruddy recently made the bombshell announcement that she has successfully cured several cancer patients using ivermectin, as Slay News reported.
Amazingly, she revealed that every terminally ill patient who tried ivermectin made a full recovery that left doctors stunned.
Dr. Ruddy revealed that the so-called “horse dewormer” has stunned doctors by triggering dramatic recoveries in those suffering late-stage cancer.
Ruddy said the drug was tried on three patients who had exhausted all other cancer treatments.
She revealed that the patients went from their deathbeds to making a full recovery and being completely cancer-free in under a year after taking ivermectin.
She said all of the other patients had been told there was nothing more that could be and they all made amazing recoveries after taking ivermectin.
She noted that the probably of the patients recovering coincidentally while taking ivermectin was “zero”
“It’s like winning the lottery on the first three tickets you ever buy,” she explained.
A celebrated medical professor has confirmed that the “wonder drug” ivermectin has successfully been used to treat and cure terminally ill cancer patients.
The bombshell announcement was made by Dr. Paul Marik, an American physician and revered professor of medicine.
Speaking about the breakthrough during a new interview, Marik revealed that doctors have been stunned after seeing that cancer had “disappeared” in patients who received ivermectin.
Marik, a former critical care doctor at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital who also served as chair of the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School in Norfolk, Virginia, revealed that severely ill cancer patients made a complete recovery after they were given ivermectin.
Second to penicillin, Ivermectin is often recognized for having the greatest impact on human health.
Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize.
However, when it was found to treat Covid patients and threatened the rollout of mRNA shots, corporate media propagandists scrambled to convince the public that the wonder drug is nothing more than a “dangerous horse dewormer.”
Yet, major breakthroughs have emerged in recent weeks showing that ivermectin is “very effective against certain cancers.”
Dr. Marik revealed that ivermectin was given to patients as part of a “combination approach” alongside other drugs.
He revealed that the introduction of ivermectin provided astonishing results.
During the new interview with the Epoch Times, Marik announced:
“Patients who had solid tumors, who were given the horse dewormer (ivermectin), and together with some other drugs … the cancer disappeared.”
As Slay News reported, Cancer surgeon Dr. Kathleen Ruddy announced last month that she has successfully cured several cancer patients using ivermectin.
Amazingly, she revealed that every terminally ill patient who tried ivermectin made a full recovery that left doctors stunned.
Dr. Ruddy revealed that the so-called “horse dewormer” has stunned doctors by triggering dramatic recoveries in those suffering late-stage cancer.
Ruddy said the drug was tried on three patients who had exhausted all other cancer treatments.
She revealed that the patients went from their deathbeds to making a full recovery and being completely cancer-free in under a year after taking ivermectin.
One patient had a grim future when the cancer had spread so much that he was expected to soon die.
This man had stage four prostate cancer, Ruddy explains.
He had tried all the conventional protocols before doctors told him that there was nothing more they could do.
When the man had nothing left to lose, he started taking ivermectin and the results were astonishing.
Within six months, the metastatic lesions began to disappear, according to Dr. Ruddy.
In under a year, “he was out dancing for four hours,” three nights per week, she revealed.
A similar scenario unfolded for another man named Eddie.
He was diagnosed with two unresectable esophageal tumors that surgeons were unable to remove.
Eddie couldn’t swallow and had lost 40 pounds in a year and a half.
However, he started taking ivermectin and doctors couldn’t believe the transformation.
“Within a couple of weeks, he sounded stronger,” Ruddy noted.
“He could swallow.
“He had gained six pounds.
“His voice was better.”
A few weeks later, Ruddy told Eddie, “Get a scan.”
“We got the scan,” Ruddy recalled.
“No tumors. Gone. Gone.”
She said all of the other patients had similar stories and made amazing recoveries.
She noted that the probably of the patients recovering coincidentally while taking ivermectin was “zero”
“It’s like winning the lottery on the first three tickets you ever buy,” she explained.
She noted that the patients were not vaccinated for Covid.
As Slay News previously reported, a major study recently confirmed that ivermectin is successful in treating multiple cancers after testing its use against 28 types of the disease.
The groundbreaking study was highlighted by Dr. William Makis MD, a leading radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher.
The study was led by a team of researchers in Mexico led by Dr. Mandy Juarez.
“Remember: Turbo cancers caused by Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines are very resistant to chemotherapy.
“Ivermectin can overcome this chemoresistance.
“This is the first study I’ve seen that has tested as many as 28 Cancer types with Ivermectin. Incredible.”
Doctors and scientists are continuing to stun the scientific community as the “wonder drug” is now being used to treat a growing list of various ailments in humans.
As Slay News recently reported, ivermectin has also been proven as a treatment for Parkinson’s, Covid mRNA “vaccine” damage, epilepsy, and many other diseases.
According to one study of many, ivermectin can be used to treat:
cancer
myiasis
trichinosis
malaria
leishmaniasis
American trypanosomiasis
schistosomiasis
bedbugs
rosacea
asthma
epilepsy
neurological diseases
HIV
tuberculosis
Buruli ulcer
Meanwhile, multiple studies have continued to emerge linking soaring cancer rates to Covid mRNA shots.
As Slay News reported, two new studies have just been published showing links between the deadly disease and the injections.
The two recent studies both confirm warnings from leading experts around the world that spike proteins and damaged autoimmune symptoms are triggering turbo cancers in the vaxxed.
In addition, another leading oncologist has been raising the alarm about the staggering surge in cancer cases among young people.
North Carolina‘s Duke University oncologist Dr. Nicholas DeVito is warning that “every new patient” who now comes to his clinic is under 45 years old.
Ivermectin is continuing to stun the scientific community as the “wonder drug” is being used to treat a growing list of various ailments in humans.
During the pandemic, the corporate media and bureaucratic health officials attempted to smear ivermectin as a “horse dewormer” after it was found to be successful in treating Covid patients.
Despite the reports of cheap and readily available ivermectin being successfully used to treat patients, it posed a threat to the pharmaceutical industry’s Covid mRNA shots and the profits from pushing the injections onto the public.
This smear campaign led to ivermectin, a Nobel prize-winning drug considered to be the second most important medicinal discovery after penicillin, being labeled as “dangerous.”
Ivermectin, a drug derived from a soil microbe, was found to be incredibly effective in treating Covid patients, however.
One prominent case of ivermectin helping a Covid patient involved 80-year-old Judith Smemthiewicz.
After being told there was not much hope left for her, Smemthiewicz made a remarkable recovery after taking the drug in early 2021.
“…[she] was placed on a ventilator in late December,” ABC’s WKBW reported at the time.
“Initially doctors gave her one dose of the controversial drug Ivermectin, and she improved.”
The miracle drug has been found to treat far more serious illnesses than Covid, however.
In 2022, a study found that ivermectin inhibits tumor metastasis.
In the “Abstract” section of the study’s paper, the researchers wrote:
“Tumor metastasis is the major cause of cancer mortality; therefore, it is imperative to discover effective therapeutic drugs for anti-metastasis therapy.
“In the current study, we investigated whether ivermectin (IVM), an FDA-approved antiparasitic drug, could prevent cancer metastasis.
“Colorectal and breast cancer cell lines and a cancer cell-derived xenograft tumor metastasis model were used to investigate the anti-metastasis effect of IVM.
“Our results showed that IVM significantly inhibited the motility of cancer cells in vitro and tumor metastasis in vivo.
“Mechanistically, IVM suppressed the expressions of the migration-related proteins via inhibiting the activation of Wnt/β-catenin/integrin β1/FAK and the downstream signaling cascades.
“Our findings indicated that IVM was capable of suppressing tumor metastasis, which provided the rationale on exploring the potential clinical application of IVM in the prevention and treatment of cancer metastasis.”
Another study revealed that ivermectin can help prevent neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis.
In the “Conclusion” section of the study’s paper, the researchers wrote:
“The results evidenced that IVM and nano-IVM administration is capable of reducing demyelination in mice.”
Demyelination is the loss of myelin in nervous system tissue.
The study aimed to analyze ivermectin’s effects on the phenomenon.
In the “Objectives” section of the study, the researchers note:
“Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease of the central nervous system (CNS) and its cause is unknown.
“Several environmental and genetic factors may have roles in the pathogenesis of MS.
“The synthesis of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) for ivermectin (IVM) loading was performed to increase its efficiency and bioavailability and evaluate its ability in improving the behavioral and histopathological changes induced by cuprizone (CPZ) in the male C57BL/6 mice.”
Additionally, ivermectin has been found to treat injuries caused by Covid mRNA shots.
Dr. Mary Talley Bowden revealed that, in her own clinical practice, ivermectin has offered profound results in treating vaccine injuries.
“I usually start them on ivermectin because it binds the spike protein,” Bowden said.
“It has anti-inflammatory properties.
“It actually has 20 different mechanisms of action, and the reason I start with ivermectin, other than what’s written in the literature, but clinically, I’ve seen some patients with really severe rashes from these shots, and they’ve cleared up pretty dramatically with the ivermectin.”
Ivermectin, AKA “horse dewormer,” has not only been vindicated as an effective treatment for COVID, but now it is proving to be one of the best remedies for vaccine injury.
Dr. Mary Talley Bowden attests to this. In her own clinical practice, ivermectin has offered profound… pic.twitter.com/1aOrpHO5eV
Another study chronicled the history of the drug, its technical characteristics, as well as a long list of ailments it has been documented to treat.
According to the study, ivermectin can be used to treat:
cancer
myiasis
trichinosis
malaria
leishmaniasis
American trypanosomiasis
schistosomiasis
bedbugs
rosacea
asthma
epilepsy
neurological diseases
HIV
tuberculosis
Buruli ulcer
The study explained that the drug can be used to treat a “variety of cancers,” noting:
“There is a continuously accumulating body of evidence that ivermectin may have substantial value in the treatment of a variety of cancers.
“The avermectins are known to possess pronounced antitumor activity, as well as the ability to potentiate the antitumor action of vincristine on Ehrlich carcinoma, melanoma B16 and P388 lymphoid leukemia, including the vincristine-resistant strain P388.
“Over the past few years, there have been steadily increasing reports that ivermectin may have varying uses as an anti-cancer agent, as it has been shown to exhibit both anti-cancer and anti-cancer stem cell properties.
“An in silico chemical genomics approach designed to predict whether any existing drugs might be useful in tackling glioblastoma, lung and breast cancer, indicated that ivermectin may be a useful compound in this respect.”
In an article posted to his Repurposed Drugs Substack, physician, writer, and human rights advocate Justus R. Hope unpacked the latest science on ivermectin.
In addition to fighting viruses, bacteria, and cancer, Hope explains that ivermectin also shows unique neuroprotective benefits.
Citing the work of Dr. William Makis, Hope explains that ivermectin prevents P2X4 receptors from internalizing and overexpressing.
P2X4 expression is a driver of many neurological diseases including dementia (i.e., Alzheimer’s disease), Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis (MS), chronic neuropathic pain, depression, bipolar disorder, and anxiety.
If you suffer from migraines or abuse alcohol, ivermectin may help you as well due to the same P2X4 stabilization effects that provide neuroprotective benefits.
Taking ivermectin could help to reduce cravings for and consumption of alcohol in those with an alcohol abuse disorder.
“If it is neuroprotective, and the evidence is growing that it is, and humanity is being bombarded with various toxins and electromagnetic frequencies each day that compromise our nervous system, perhaps there is reason to consider Ivermectin as a neuro-protective repurposed drug worthy of use during this dangerous time in our history,” Hope contends.
Hope believes that a growing body of evidence points to ivermectin helping to protect the nervous system from EMF damage “during this dangerous time in our history.”
“Ivermectin may not just be the anti-parasitic, anti-cancer, anti-viral repurposed drug we recognize but may have multiple other neuroprotective benefits for humanity in an era where we all may be subjected to neurotoxins – some apparent, and others invisible – like EMF,” Hope writes.
Further, cancer surgeon Dr. Kathleen Ruddy recently made the bombshell announcement that she has successfully cured several cancer patients using ivermectin, as Slay News reported.
Amazingly, she revealed that every terminally ill patient who tried ivermectin made a full recovery that left doctors stunned.
Dr. Ruddy revealed that the so-called “horse dewormer” has stunned doctors by triggering dramatic recoveries in those suffering late-stage cancer.
Ruddy said the drug was tried on three patients who had exhausted all other cancer treatments.
She revealed that the patients went from their deathbeds to making a full recovery and being completely cancer-free in under a year after taking ivermectin.
She said all of the other patients had been told there was nothing more that could be and they all made amazing recoveries after taking ivermectin.
She noted that the probably of the patients recovering coincidentally while taking ivermectin was “zero”
“It’s like winning the lottery on the first three tickets you ever buy,” she explained.
World Freedom 