Numerous individuals have suggested that former President Joe Biden might have previously died and been replaced with a “clone” version.
Some argue that he may have been replaced by multiple clones, which would explain his bizarre changes in behavior.
President Donald Trump has just sent shockwaves through Washington, D.C. by suggesting in a Truth Social post that Biden actually died in 2020 and was since replaced by a clone version.
Trump shared a post from another user that said Biden was “executed in 2020.”
The theory unsurprisingly went viral, with plenty of people agreeing and just as many criticizing him for saying it, according to the Daily Mail.
It’s important to note that the president did not add his own commentary to the post.
Nevertheless, Trump merely sharing it seemed to be enough to send many over the edge.
The post theorized that Biden had died in 2020 and was replaced by a clone, aided by advanced robotics engineering.
“There is no #JoeBiden – executed in 2020,” wrote Truth Social user llijh.
“#Biden clones, doubles & robotic engineered soulless mindless entities are what you see.
“#Democrats dont know the difference.”
The Daily Mail noted:
“Almost immediately, social media erupted, with supporters and critics alike grappling with the surreal suggestion.”
“We all knew something was completely off,” one commenter wrote.
“Although Trump has said repeatedly that Joe Biden was shot.”
Many of the Truth Social users who didn’t agree or disagree expressed shock that the president shared the post.
Another user proposed additional theories that tied into that one:
“Thank you, do you know how long I’ve been saying this?
“Trump was still our President in his first term, and I knew Joe Biden was gone during his run for president.
“They installed The Biden…an actor (blue eyes & brown eyes),” wrote another.
The post referred to fringe theories that claim noticeable changes in Biden’s eye color are evidence of a body double.
Users across social media had plenty to say about Trump’s reTruthed post.
Users across social media had plenty to say about Trump’s reTruthed post.
If NO JOE, Last 4 Years Can Be Wiped Clean!
Trump: “Remember what I said, the autopen. This government was illegally run for 4 years.”
ReTruthed by Trump: There is no #JoeBiden – executed in 2020.#Biden clones doubles & robotic engineered soulless mindless entities are what… pic.twitter.com/ck5TrFSh23
Olympic women’s boxing gold medalist Imane Khelif has been confirmed to be male, a leaked medical report has revealed.
Khelif has been under intense scrutiny following allegations that he is biologically male, despite competing as female.
The Algerian professional boxer doesn’t claim to be transgender and insists he’s a biological female.
However, a medical report—reportedly stemming from the 2023 World Championships—has emerged, indicating Khelif’s sex test confirms male chromosomes, according to multiple outlets.
The controversy broke just two days after World Boxing announced Khelif would need to undergo sex verification testing to remain eligible for women’s events.
Khelif, who represented Algeria in Paris and won gold, was allowed to compete despite longstanding questions about his eligibility.
“Chromosome analysis reveals male karyotype,” states the document, seen by 3 Wire Sports via Telegraph Sport.
The report, dated March 17, 2023, appears on the letterhead of Dr Lal PathLabs, a reputable New Delhi-based lab accredited by the American College of Pathologists and ISO-certified.
Journalist Alan Abrahamson first brought attention to the allegations at the Paris Games and published the findings that reignited global debate about fairness in women’s sports.
World Boxing has responded by updating its eligibility standards.
In a letter to the Algerian Boxing Federation, the organization declared:
“Imane Khelif may not participate in the female category at the Eindhoven Box Cup, 5-10 June 2025, and any World Boxing event until Imane Khelif undergoes genetic sex screening in accordance with World Boxing’s rules and testing procedures.”
The letter further explained:
“In May 2025, the Executive Board exercised this authority and adopted new eligibility criteria for participation in sex-specific boxing categories.
“These new eligibility rules were developed with the express purpose of safeguarding athletes in combat sports, particularly given the physical risks associated with Olympic-style boxing.”
The new policy mandates that all athletes over 18 must undergo PCR testing for genetic sex verification.
According to World Boxing, “the PCR test is a laboratory technique used to detect specific genetic material, with the SRY gene revealing the presence of the Y chromosome, which is an indicator of biological sex.”
Samples may be taken via swab, saliva, or blood.
Khelif had previously expressed his intent to defend his gold medal at the 2028 Los Angeles Games.
However, World Boxing’s updated “Sex, Age and Weight” policy casts significant doubt on his eligibility moving
forward.
The governing body reiterated its stance:
“…in the event the athlete’s sex certification is challenged by the athlete’s federation or by World Boxing, the athlete shall be ineligible to compete until the dispute is resolved…”
This isn’t the first time Khelif faced questions about his sex status.
He was disqualified by the International Boxing Association (IBA) in 2023 for reportedly failing similar gender eligibility protocols.
Khelif isn’t alone in the Paris controversy.
Taiwan’s Lin Yu-ting also drew criticism after winning gold in the women’s event despite being banned by the IBA in 2023 for posing as female.
Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) is blasting the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) after it approved yet another Covid “vaccine.”
This time it was Moderna’s (mRNA) latest shot, mNEXSPIKE.
The new injection is aimed at Americans 65 and older and those with underlying health conditions.
“Not MAHA at all!!!” Greene posted on X.
Greene’s comment refers to the “Make America Healthy Again” slogan of President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
We announced today that the U.S. FDA has approved mNEXSPIKE®, a new vaccine against COVID-19, for use in all adults 65 and older, as well as individuals aged 12 years through 64 years of age with at least one underlying condition that puts them at high risk for severe outcomes… pic.twitter.com/RJ1CezICKZ
In a move that has sparked outrage among medical experts, lawmakers, and participants, Australia’s Queensland Health has suddenly shut down one of the world’s largest real-world studies comparing Covid “vaccinated” and unvaccinated individuals and ordered the complete destruction of all samples and critical data.
The state’s health officials permanently shut down the QoVAX Safety and Efficacy Trial (QoVAX-SET).
However, the reasoning behind the sudden destruction of all data was not clear.
The announcement came in a letter to participants, in which Metro North Health stated:
“There is no longer a scientific and public health need to retain these biological samples for future
“These samples will be appropriately sterilised and disposed of,” the letter continued.
“All study data… will be archived… [but] will not be accessed or used for any future purpose.”
Critics, meanwhile, say the move is nothing short of scientific sabotage.
Notably, QoVAX was one of the only major global studies with access to a “comparison set” of individuals who had been “vaccinated” but had never contracted COVID-19.
This data pool is considered invaluable to understanding “vaccine” efficacy and potential long-term side effects.
The study included 10,000 adult participants, both vaxxed and unvaxxed, from “86% of Queensland’s postcodes.”
Scientists had collected over 100,000 biospecimens and 11 million data points.
Major institutions — including QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, the University of Queensland, QUT, James Cook University, and Griffith University — contributed to the project.
The study was defunded in 2023 with no official explanation.
The decision derailed the nearly complete research and triggered public backlash.
Since then, a growing chorus of lawmakers and scientists has questioned the state government’s motives.
Senator Gerard Rennick, an outspoken critic of the mass Covid injection rollout and advocate for vaccine-injured Australians, took to Parliament to demand answers:
“Why has the Queensland health department withdrawn funding for its award-winning QoVAX research program studying the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines?” Rennick said.
“QoVAX rapidly enrolled over 10,000 participants…
“The team collected not just basic health data, but also environmental, genomic, and immunological data that could help us understand how these novel mRNA and DNA vaccines affect the immune system.
“Instead of answering vital questions about why highly vaccinated countries like Australia saw such high excess mortality and long Covid rates, the government has chosen to shut down the only study that could deliver real answers.”
QoVAX Director Professor Janet Davies called the decision “incredibly disappointing,” underscoring the study’s global importance.
Senator Malcolm Roberts was even more blunt in a Facebook post:
“Losing the last evidence that could inform a truly objective assessment of the effects of the injections wouldn’t just be a tragedy — it could be a crime.
“I’m putting Queensland Health bureaucrats on notice: do not destroy these samples and evidence.
“Allow the study to complete so that the data can be shared for all Australians.”
Despite the massive scale and participation, all physical evidence will now be sterilized and discarded.
While the data will be legally archived, officials say it will never be accessed or used, effectively burying any possibility of full, independent analysis of Australia’s Covid “vaccine” response.
For many, the destruction of such a rare and robust dataset only confirms what skeptics have long feared: that governments would rather bury the truth than confront it.
The World Council for Health has issued a warning after renowned experts concluded that billions of people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines” are now facing a “ticking time bomb” of looming deaths, disease, and injuries.
While global health bureaucrats and pharmaceutical giants continue pushing Covid mRNA shots, new revelations about the chemical delivery system used in these injections are raising serious red flags.
At the center of the controversy: lipid nanoparticles (LNPs).
LNPs are microscopic synthetic fat particles used to deliver mRNA into human cells.
Originally sold as cutting-edge “safe and effective” technology, these LNPs are now under scrutiny for potential long-term toxicity, metabolic disruption, and triggering of autoimmune or neurodegenerative conditions.
Despite these concerns, after billions were injected with unvetted nano-tech, Pfizer, Moderna, and government regulators are stonewalling even basic safety questions.
One basic question that remains unanswered: How many LNPs are in a single Covid “vaccine” dose?
When eminent German researcher Maria Gutschi tried to find out, she got a disturbing response.
Gutschi hit mRNA “vaccine” maker Moderna with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
Gutschi said she also presented the same question to the UK’s drug regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), but didn’t receive a response.
This lack of transparency has alarmed experts and watchdogs.
According to a report from the World Council for Health (WCH):
“Billions of people have been injected with a poorly characterised chemical delivery system – and now we’re just starting to see the fallout.”
The WCH warns that the injections are “acting like a slow-release poison,” which has created a “ticking time bomb” among the global population.
German researcher Genervter Bürger reports that only one scientific paper includes mass and numerical data of LNPs.
The study detected Moderna’s SM-102, an ionisable lipid, lingering in the bloodstream seven days post-injection, still above background levels.
Keep in mind — this is a synthetic, non-human lipid.
As Bürger explains, comparing it to “background levels” is like saying a trace of arsenic in your coffee is fine.
Meanwhile, Pfizer’s proprietary lipid, ALC-0315, has its own set of issues.
Fresh vials showed 0.19% oxidized impurities, and the most reactive components weren’t even fully tested.
And oxidized lipids? They’re “biological grenades” that:
A landmark scientific review, The Chemical Reactivity of Membrane Lipids, warned:
“When primary amines are present in membranes (e.g., sphingosine), reactive aldehydes can crosslink them, triggering vesicle aggregation.”
In layman’s terms: these particles don’t just deliver mRNA — they can wreak havoc on cell membranes.
From cholesterol ratios that accelerate lipid breakdown to tertiary amines that interfere with cellular receptors, the evidence suggests that slow, systemic toxicity from these particles may be flying completely under the radar.
The unanswered question: Were some batches more toxic than others?
With no batch consistency data released, the public may never know.
“We need transparency from both the vaccine manufacturers and drug regulators,” the WHC warns.
That means batch testing, LNP quantification, oxidation monitoring, and — most critically — long-term follow-up to understand how long these synthetic particles linger and what damage they might cause.
As the World Council for Health continues to push for the withdrawal of these experimental gene therapies, the silence from Big Pharma and public health agencies is deafening — and deeply troubling.
A world-renowned oncologist has issued a major warning to the public about the global surge in deadly “turbo cancers” among those who received “horrible” Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
The warning was issued by Dr. Angus Dalgleish, who warns that the mRNA injections are “not vaccines.”
During an appearance on the Sky News TV network in the UK, Dalgleish revealed that he’s “terrified” about the long-term impact of the global mass “vaccination” campaign.
Dalgleish is a professor of oncology at the prestigious St George’s Hospital Medical School in London.
He has become one of the leading voices in raising concerns about the links between mRNA injections and rapidly spreading aggressive cancers.
“This is Nuremberg trial stuff,” Dr. Dalgleish declared.
“These were not vaccines.
“These were horrible gene therapies that could actually integrate into your genome,” he explains.
“And this is one of the reasons we’re seeing this horrendous rise in turbo cancers.”
“I am terrified about what they have done to our children,” the professor added.
“They were never, ever effective… and they were never, ever safe.”
WATCH: To see the video below click on thhe following weblink below the image…
Professor Dalgleish has long expressed concerns about the link between Covid mRNA shots and an observed increase in certain aggressive cancers.
In his statements, Professor Dalgleish notes that he has observed relapses in melanoma patients who had been stable for years following their Covid mRNA “booster” shots.
He also mentions that other oncologists from around the world have reported similar patterns, including increased incidences of lymphomas, leukaemias, and kidney cancers post-mRNA injection.
Additionally, his colorectal cancer colleagues have reported an “epidemic of explosive cancers,” characterized by multiple metastatic spreads in the liver and elsewhere.
Dalgleish suggests that these occurrences are predominantly in patients who received the Covid shots, often due to travel requirements or work-related mandates.
He believes that T cell suppression following “vaccination” could be a contributing factor, as immunotherapy is typically effective in these cancers.
Dr. Dalgleish also raises concerns about potential DNA plasmid and SV40 integration promoting cancer development.
He has also highlighted reports that the mRNA spike protein may bind to p53 and other cancer suppressor genes.
Dalgleish is not alone in this view, however.
In April, several leading oncologists warned that a devastating “turbo cancer” surge is about to “explode” among people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines,” as Slay News reported.
Some of the world’s most highly respected cancer experts are sounding the alarm over concerns of the looming health crisis.
The warnings were revealed in a special report from John Bowne for InfoWars.
Since the “vaccines” were first rolled out for public use in early 2021, a new phenomenon has emerged that has been dubbed “turbo cancer” by oncologists.
These rapidly developing, aggressive cancers have been soaring among people who received the mRNA injections.
Doctors have revealed that the cancers are so aggressive that seemingly healthy patients can die within a week of being diagnosed.
However, while turbo cancer cases have been skyrocketing, multiple oncologists are warning that the crisis is about to get far worse.
Canada’s liberal government is refusing to rule out plans to begin euthanizing children who have been diagnosed with autism.
It comes as the globalist Canadian government seeks to expand its radical “assisted suicide” laws to include “mature minors” with mental health issues.
Canada’s liberal government is once again raising global eyebrows with the nation’s “Medical Assistance in Dying” (MAiD) program
This time, the government of Prime Minister Mark Carney is using taxpayer money to fund research discussing whether children with severe autism should qualify for euthanasia under the country’s increasingly radical assisted-death laws.
Documents recently obtained by Rebel News reveal that Health Canada has allocated over half a million dollars—$549,068—to Dalhousie University for a four-year study focused on “youth views” regarding euthanasia, palliative care, and MAiD.
The project, cloaked in progressive language, appears to open the door to what critics fear is a slippery slope: the potential state-sanctioned killing of vulnerable children.
One internal email from a Health Canada official in the Indigenous End-of-Life Care team, Heather Davids, directly asks bureaucrats Ian Gillies and Richard Martin:
“How should the department respond to public correspondence about whether severe autism meets the eligibility criteria for MAiD?”
A troubling draft reply, later removed from final versions, read:
“Your position will be carefully considered as the government advances with MAiD legislation.”
The message stops short of endorsing euthanasia for autistic children.
However, it reflects growing concerns among Canadians—and human rights advocates worldwide—that the Canadian government is willing to entertain such dangerous ideas.
Since 2021, the Liberal Party administration has aggressively expanded MAiD access, even passing Bill C-7 to allow those suffering solely from mental illness to apply starting in 2027.
The consequences are already severe.
According to Health Canada’s own numbers, MAiD ranked as the sixth leading cause of death in the country in 2022.
A staggering 13,241 Canadians died via lethal injection that year, up 31.2% from 2021, despite many not being terminally ill.
Critics argue this expansion targets the mentally ill, disabled, and increasingly the young—those most in need of protection, not a state-approved death.
The Conservative Party has repeatedly attempted to halt this moral freefall.
Conservatives introduced Bill C-314, which sought to derail the Left’s eugenics agenda.
However, these efforts have been blocked by the ruling Liberal Party’s allies.
Despite warnings from ethicists and disability advocates, the government continues to push the envelope.
The Canadian government is showing little regard for the sanctity of life or the basic protections owed to its most vulnerable citizens.
As Canada edges further down this disturbing path, many on the right are calling for urgent action to expose and stop what they see as a growing culture of state-sponsored death masquerading as “compassion.”
It comes as the Canadian government has launched a campaign to promote a new push to begin euthanizing children with mental health issues without their parents’ consent.
The new scheme seeks to open up the country’s MAiD program to children.
Carney’s government describes those children who would be eligible for “assisted suicide” using the alarmingly vague term “mature minors.”
According to the Canadian government’s promotional material, children with mental health issues would be euthanized without parental consent under the expanded laws.
The move to expand the eugenics programs to “mature minors” was revealed in flyers distributed by the Canadian government.
The flyers explain that the government of PM Carney, a World Economic Forum (WEF) “agenda contributor,” has recommended that citizens deemed “mature minors” must be allowed to qualify for euthanasia.
“A mature minor is a child or teen who is deemed capable of making a decision for MAiD,” the paper states.
“This would essentially remove the minimum age of eligibility.
“The [government] committee also suggested parents may not be consulted and wouldn’t need to consent to their child’s death via MAiD.”
However, the vagueness of the term “mature” could open up the scheme to children of all ages.
The flyer goes on to argue that, according to the Canadian government, killing children without parental consent is an example of protecting the most vulnerable citizens.
“Children are uniquely vulnerable,” the informational pamphlet says.
“Canada’s first priority must be to provide high-quality medical care for children.”
Shocking new clinical trial data has revealed that the new Bill Gates-funded self-amplifying “replicon” Covid mRNA “vaccines” cause severe blood abnormalities in almost all recipients.
As Slay News has previously reported, the ARCT-154 “vaccine” is marketed as Kostaive.
Kostaive is a self-replicating mRNA (saRNA) injection developed by Arcturus Therapeutics, a Bill Gates-funded company specializing in mRNA-based pharmaceuticals.
One of Arcturus Therapeutics’ senior advisors, former CDC and FDA official Dr. Peter A. Patriarca, also advises the Gates Foundation.
The “self-amplifying” or “replicon” mRNA shots contain the equipment needed to make more of itself once it enters cells.
The injections have been dubbed “replicon” vaccines because they are able to replicate inside the human body to produce more mRNA over time.
Yet, despite pushback, experiments for replicon injections have been advancing in third-world nations.
In newly published study has just revealed alarming data from a Phase 1 trial of the replicon “vaccines” conducted in Uganda.
The large team of researchers behind the study was led by Dr. Jonathan Kitonsa, an internationally recognized medical doctor and research scientist currently working with the MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Unit.
The findings of the peer-reviewed study were published in the MDPI medical journal.
During the clinical trials, the researchers tested a Covid replicon samRNA injection encoding the spike protein in 42 healthy adults.
The findings of the study were analyzed by renowned McCullough Foundation epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH.
According to Hulscher, the “findings were deeply concerning.”
A total of 39 Grade 3 or higher laboratory abnormality adverse events occurred after the second dose of the replicon injection.
This is equivalent to a staggering 93% of the trial’s participants.
Grade 3 events are defined by regulatory agencies as “severe or medically significant.”
In addition, 85.4% of participants experienced systemic adverse events such as muscle pain, joint pain, vomiting, and fever.
Laboratory abnormalities intensified after the second dose, suggesting cumulative toxicity or immune priming.
Concerningly, these adverse events occurred in healthy adults.
Despite these findings, the authors described the vaccine as “well tolerated.”
Yet, this characterization sharply contradicts their own data.
According to a November 2024 analysis by Hulscher, Arcturus Therapeutics is one of at least nine vaccine developers working on self-amplifying mRNA products.
So far, none of the clinical trials for the product have “addressed the major concern of product shedding,” Hulscher said.
It comes as globalists continue to push for U.S. regulators to roll out the replicon injections for use on the American people.
The U.S. has yet to approve a self-amplifying Covid mRNA “vaccine.”
However, last November, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave the green light for Arcturus Therapeutics to launch clinical trials for a replicon mRNA vaccine targeting the H5N1 virus, commonly known as “bird flu.”
As Slay News reported at the time, the trials are funded by the U.S. government and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
“The United States must REJECT this dangerous technology,” Hulscher said.
Renowned American cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough agrees with Hulscher.
“Vaccinologists have made a critical error in the design of genetic vaccines,” McCullough said.
“Injection of the genetic code for any foreign protein, including parts of viruses, causes the body to respond with an immune attack against its own cells.”
“This leads to intense vaccine injury syndromes all through the human body,” he said.
McCullough added:
“Giving the vaccines their own ‘life’ with the ability to reproduce themselves is inhumane, reckless, and from the outset, should be flagged as dangerous and potentially lethal to the recipient.”
Dr. Richard Lindzen, a world-renowned atmospheric physicist and MIT professor emeritus, is sounding the alarm about the globalist push to enforce so-called “Net Zero” policies.
Lindzen is warning the public about the global campaign to comply with “Net Zero” by 2050.
He asserts that “there will be no climate catastrophe” whether “Net Zero” is achieved or not.
In his view, the plan is not only astronomically expensive but virtually useless.
The eminent professor warns that “Net Zero” is a hoax that requires devastating public sacrifices for no environmental benefits.
“If you reach Net Zero by 2050, if you do it worldwide, you avoid about a third of a degree of warming,” says Lindzen in a new interview.
“If it’s just Europe and the Anglosphere, it’s closer to a tenth of a degree.
“So you have avoided a tenth of a degree of warming at a cost of probably tens of trillions of dollars.
“Doesn’t seem like a bargain to me,” he adds.
“How far will the population go in saying, we will sacrifice ourselves for a symbolic gesture?”
Lindzen also pushes back on the apocalyptic rhetoric coming from climate alarmists.
He especially highlights the fals
e claims by those in globalist international institutions, such as the United Nations (UN) and World Economic Forum (WEF).
“When somebody says the change of a tenth of a degree, or when [UN Secretary-General António] Guterres says, if it changes a half-degree, we’re finished as a species, this is an existential threat – people have to ask, what the hell are they talking about?”
He dismisses climate doomsday predictions as political theatrics.
“2030 will pass. 2050 will pass,” he states.
“Fifty years will pass.
“There will be no climate catastrophe.”
Lindzen, a longtime skeptic of climate panic, discusses how the role of CO₂ in warming is limited.
He also critiques the constant linking of weather extremes to human activity.
Lindzen believes policies driven by this narrative are scientifically unfounded and economically destructive.
Over his decades-long career, Lindzen has authored nearly 250 peer-reviewed studies and contributed significantly to the understanding of Earth’s climate systems.
His research spans atmospheric transport, monsoon meteorology, planetary waves, and the dynamics of heat in global weather patterns.
His work was foundational in the development of Hadley Circulation theory and the understanding of small-scale gravity waves.
In addition to holding professorships at Harvard, MIT, Tel Aviv University, and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Lindzen has advised the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
His accolades include the Clarence Leroy Meisinger Award, the Jule Charney Award, and the James B. Macelwane Medal.
He is a member of both the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Lindzen’s perspective offers a sharp rebuke to the mainstream climate agenda.
It questions whether it’s science or ideology driving the push to remake the global economy over what he sees as meaningless “climate” gains.
A chilling alert has emerged from leading experts in Japan over skyrocketing deaths among those who received repeated doses of Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
The evidence emerged during an investigation into the nation’s crippling surge in excess deaths over the last four years.
As Slay News has previouslyreported, Japan, like many other nations, is facing a population crisis amid surging excess deaths and plummeting birth rates.
A new peer-reviewed study published in the JMA Journal raises grave concerns over Japan’s record-setting rate of Covid mRNA “vaccinations” and a corresponding spike in excess deaths.
The team of researchers comprises some of Japan’s most eminent experts, including immunologist Takeshi Nitta (University of Tokyo), epidemiologist Yukari Kamijima (Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University), and virologist Takayuki Miyazawa (Kyoto University).
The researchers hypothesize that repeated Covid mRNA injections caused an unprecedented increase in excess deaths in Japan.
They note that the surge is not caused by the COVID-19 virus itself.
They call for urgent investigations into possible immunosuppressive, cardiovascular, oncological, and chronic infection consequences of mass repeated vaccination.
Japan has administered more Covid mRNA “vaccine” doses per capita than any other nation globally.
The population received a staggering 3.6 doses per person as of March 2024.
Yet after the Omicron variant emerged, the country experienced record-high infection surges and excess deaths.
The nation suffered over 1,400 excess deaths per million in 2023.
Notably, only 10% of these deaths were officially attributed to COVID-19.
However, like many other nations around the world, those deaths were blamed on COVID-19 because those people died with Covid, not from it.
The excess death rate in 2023 was triple the U.S. level and unprecedented in postwar Japanese history.
The authors investigated three hypotheses for this trend:
Underreported COVID-19 deaths
Healthcare system strain
Adverse effects of the “vaccines” themselves
The latter is gaining attention due to Japan’s robust adverse event compensation system.
As of November 2024, the system had paid claims for 903 deaths and over 8,400 injuries linked to Covid “vaccines.”
This far surpasses payouts for all other vaccines combined in the prior 47 years.
While acknowledging that vaccination likely reduced severe outcomes in elderly and vulnerable populations early in the pandemic, the authors critique the aggressive promotion of boosters for low-risk populations, including teenagers and young adults.
They cite early unpublished data from 2021, delayed in publication for over a year, suggesting that vaccination did not significantly reduce viral transmission, undermining arguments for vaccinating low-risk individuals to protect the community.
The paper references growing concerns around adverse events such as myocarditis, blood clots, and autoimmune disease following mRNA vaccination, attributed in part to lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery systems and prolonged spike protein expression.
Excess mortality data from the UK mirrors this trend, showing increases in cardiovascular but not respiratory deaths after the “vaccine” rollout.
Even more concerning, the researchers note an unexplained uptick in deaths from rapidly developing estrogen-sensitive cancers such as breast, uterine, and pancreatic cancer.
They cite peer-reviewed research suggesting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to estrogen receptors and contains a nuclear localization signal, allowing it to potentially interfere with nuclear DNA regulation.
A central focus of the study is a proposed mechanism of post-vaccination immunosuppression, potentially leading to chronic low-level SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The authors cite multiple studies showing an increase in IgG4—an anti-inflammatory antibody subtype—and regulatory T cells following repeated mRNA vaccinations.
These findings suggest repeated dosing may paradoxically dampen immune responses, leaving the host more vulnerable to persistent infection or other health complications.
Kakeya et al. propose that this suppression may explain not only the high level of non-Covid excess deaths but also the synchronicity between infection waves and unrelated mortality peaks.
Wastewater data showing viral presence despite negative PCR tests support this possibility.
The study is particularly critical of Japanese public health authorities.
The nation’s health officials were accused of misclassifying “vaccinated” individuals as unvaccinated due to missing documentation—a mistake later acknowledged.
This error significantly inflated “vaccine” effectiveness estimates.
Once corrected, data showed similar or even higher infection rates among the “vaccinated,” raising further concerns about transparency and scientific integrity.
With Japanese citizens receiving anywhere from zero to eight mRNA doses depending on age and policy phase, the researchers stress that Japan is uniquely positioned to study long-term “vaccine” safety and efficacy across a broad population spectrum.
They urge full release of health and mortality data to enable global health researchers to evaluate possible delayed adverse outcomes from mRNA “vaccine” technology.
The study also cites recent comments by former CDC Director Robert Redfield.
Redfield told The Chris Cuomo Project that the risks outweigh the benefits for healthy, younger adults to receive mRNA “vaccines.”
“There’s prolonged production or impact or negative consequence from spike protein in some people that get the mRNA vaccine,” Redfield stated.
The JMA Journal’s publication of this provocative article marks a rare and urgent academic call from within a highly “vaccinated” society regarding the deadly impact of repeated mRNA “vaccination.”
With Japan’s mortality signals diverging sharply from its Covid case counts, public health institutions worldwide must reassess the long-term safety profile of mRNA-LNP platforms, especially in young, healthy populations.
As data transparency becomes an ethical imperative, researchers and governments alike face mounting pressure to explain Japan’s excess death anomaly before the world proceeds further down the path of repeated mRNA-based immunization.
