Dr. Richard Lindzen, a world-renowned atmospheric physicist and MIT professor emeritus, is sounding the alarm about the globalist push to enforce so-called “Net Zero” policies.
Lindzen is warning the public about the global campaign to comply with “Net Zero” by 2050.
He asserts that “there will be no climate catastrophe” whether “Net Zero” is achieved or not.
In his view, the plan is not only astronomically expensive but virtually useless.
The eminent professor warns that “Net Zero” is a hoax that requires devastating public sacrifices for no environmental benefits.
“If you reach Net Zero by 2050, if you do it worldwide, you avoid about a third of a degree of warming,” says Lindzen in a new interview.
“If it’s just Europe and the Anglosphere, it’s closer to a tenth of a degree.
“So you have avoided a tenth of a degree of warming at a cost of probably tens of trillions of dollars.
“Doesn’t seem like a bargain to me,” he adds.
“How far will the population go in saying, we will sacrifice ourselves for a symbolic gesture?”
Lindzen also pushes back on the apocalyptic rhetoric coming from climate alarmists.
He especially highlights the fals
e claims by those in globalist international institutions, such as the United Nations (UN) and World Economic Forum (WEF).
“When somebody says the change of a tenth of a degree, or when [UN Secretary-General António] Guterres says, if it changes a half-degree, we’re finished as a species, this is an existential threat – people have to ask, what the hell are they talking about?”
He dismisses climate doomsday predictions as political theatrics.
“2030 will pass. 2050 will pass,” he states.
“Fifty years will pass.
“There will be no climate catastrophe.”
Lindzen, a longtime skeptic of climate panic, discusses how the role of CO₂ in warming is limited.
He also critiques the constant linking of weather extremes to human activity.
Lindzen believes policies driven by this narrative are scientifically unfounded and economically destructive.
Over his decades-long career, Lindzen has authored nearly 250 peer-reviewed studies and contributed significantly to the understanding of Earth’s climate systems.
His research spans atmospheric transport, monsoon meteorology, planetary waves, and the dynamics of heat in global weather patterns.
His work was foundational in the development of Hadley Circulation theory and the understanding of small-scale gravity waves.
In addition to holding professorships at Harvard, MIT, Tel Aviv University, and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Lindzen has advised the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
His accolades include the Clarence Leroy Meisinger Award, the Jule Charney Award, and the James B. Macelwane Medal.
He is a member of both the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Lindzen’s perspective offers a sharp rebuke to the mainstream climate agenda.
It questions whether it’s science or ideology driving the push to remake the global economy over what he sees as meaningless “climate” gains.
A chilling alert has emerged from leading experts in Japan over skyrocketing deaths among those who received repeated doses of Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
The evidence emerged during an investigation into the nation’s crippling surge in excess deaths over the last four years.
As Slay News has previouslyreported, Japan, like many other nations, is facing a population crisis amid surging excess deaths and plummeting birth rates.
A new peer-reviewed study published in the JMA Journal raises grave concerns over Japan’s record-setting rate of Covid mRNA “vaccinations” and a corresponding spike in excess deaths.
The team of researchers comprises some of Japan’s most eminent experts, including immunologist Takeshi Nitta (University of Tokyo), epidemiologist Yukari Kamijima (Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University), and virologist Takayuki Miyazawa (Kyoto University).
The researchers hypothesize that repeated Covid mRNA injections caused an unprecedented increase in excess deaths in Japan.
They note that the surge is not caused by the COVID-19 virus itself.
They call for urgent investigations into possible immunosuppressive, cardiovascular, oncological, and chronic infection consequences of mass repeated vaccination.
Japan has administered more Covid mRNA “vaccine” doses per capita than any other nation globally.
The population received a staggering 3.6 doses per person as of March 2024.
Yet after the Omicron variant emerged, the country experienced record-high infection surges and excess deaths.
The nation suffered over 1,400 excess deaths per million in 2023.
Notably, only 10% of these deaths were officially attributed to COVID-19.
However, like many other nations around the world, those deaths were blamed on COVID-19 because those people died with Covid, not from it.
The excess death rate in 2023 was triple the U.S. level and unprecedented in postwar Japanese history.
The authors investigated three hypotheses for this trend:
Underreported COVID-19 deaths
Healthcare system strain
Adverse effects of the “vaccines” themselves
The latter is gaining attention due to Japan’s robust adverse event compensation system.
As of November 2024, the system had paid claims for 903 deaths and over 8,400 injuries linked to Covid “vaccines.”
This far surpasses payouts for all other vaccines combined in the prior 47 years.
While acknowledging that vaccination likely reduced severe outcomes in elderly and vulnerable populations early in the pandemic, the authors critique the aggressive promotion of boosters for low-risk populations, including teenagers and young adults.
They cite early unpublished data from 2021, delayed in publication for over a year, suggesting that vaccination did not significantly reduce viral transmission, undermining arguments for vaccinating low-risk individuals to protect the community.
The paper references growing concerns around adverse events such as myocarditis, blood clots, and autoimmune disease following mRNA vaccination, attributed in part to lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery systems and prolonged spike protein expression.
Excess mortality data from the UK mirrors this trend, showing increases in cardiovascular but not respiratory deaths after the “vaccine” rollout.
Even more concerning, the researchers note an unexplained uptick in deaths from rapidly developing estrogen-sensitive cancers such as breast, uterine, and pancreatic cancer.
They cite peer-reviewed research suggesting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to estrogen receptors and contains a nuclear localization signal, allowing it to potentially interfere with nuclear DNA regulation.
A central focus of the study is a proposed mechanism of post-vaccination immunosuppression, potentially leading to chronic low-level SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The authors cite multiple studies showing an increase in IgG4—an anti-inflammatory antibody subtype—and regulatory T cells following repeated mRNA vaccinations.
These findings suggest repeated dosing may paradoxically dampen immune responses, leaving the host more vulnerable to persistent infection or other health complications.
Kakeya et al. propose that this suppression may explain not only the high level of non-Covid excess deaths but also the synchronicity between infection waves and unrelated mortality peaks.
Wastewater data showing viral presence despite negative PCR tests support this possibility.
The study is particularly critical of Japanese public health authorities.
The nation’s health officials were accused of misclassifying “vaccinated” individuals as unvaccinated due to missing documentation—a mistake later acknowledged.
This error significantly inflated “vaccine” effectiveness estimates.
Once corrected, data showed similar or even higher infection rates among the “vaccinated,” raising further concerns about transparency and scientific integrity.
With Japanese citizens receiving anywhere from zero to eight mRNA doses depending on age and policy phase, the researchers stress that Japan is uniquely positioned to study long-term “vaccine” safety and efficacy across a broad population spectrum.
They urge full release of health and mortality data to enable global health researchers to evaluate possible delayed adverse outcomes from mRNA “vaccine” technology.
The study also cites recent comments by former CDC Director Robert Redfield.
Redfield told The Chris Cuomo Project that the risks outweigh the benefits for healthy, younger adults to receive mRNA “vaccines.”
“There’s prolonged production or impact or negative consequence from spike protein in some people that get the mRNA vaccine,” Redfield stated.
The JMA Journal’s publication of this provocative article marks a rare and urgent academic call from within a highly “vaccinated” society regarding the deadly impact of repeated mRNA “vaccination.”
With Japan’s mortality signals diverging sharply from its Covid case counts, public health institutions worldwide must reassess the long-term safety profile of mRNA-LNP platforms, especially in young, healthy populations.
As data transparency becomes an ethical imperative, researchers and governments alike face mounting pressure to explain Japan’s excess death anomaly before the world proceeds further down the path of repeated mRNA-based immunization.
A damning new study from the world-renowned Cleveland Clinic has confirmed that flu “vaccines” slash overall life expectancy by increasing the chance of being infected with influenza.
The study found that people who received the seasonal shots have a 26.9% higher chance of getting the flu compared to the unvaccinated.
The findings of the study were highlighted by esteemed British immunologist Dr. John Campbell.
In a video shared on his YouTube channel, Dr. Campbell explains:
“A large study at the Cleveland Clinic found out that the flu ‘vaccine’ – the influenza ‘vaccine’ – over the last Winter, wasn’t that effective.
“In fact, it had a negative efficacy of 26.9%.
“In other words, if you took this flu vaccine, you were 26.9% more likely – more likely – to get influenza.
“Now, unfortunately, the paper doesn’t give us details on how much money the pharmaceutical industry made from selling this ‘vaccine’ with negative efficacy.”
Big Pharma makes $6.3 billion annually on this “vaccine.”
WATCH: Click on the link below the image to view and listen to the video…
Cleveland Clinic researchers published the findings of their study on medRxiv.
The study assessed the flu infection rate among employees who received the flu “vaccine” relative to those who did not receive the shots.
Using a Cox regression model while adjusting for age, sex, clinical nursing job, and location, they found the vaccinated had a hazard ratio of 1.269.
They concluded the vaccinated had a 26.9% higher risk of infection, and thus concluded -26.9% negative “vaccine” effectiveness.
Only employees of the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio who were employed on October 1, 2024, were included.
The cumulative incidence of influenza among those in the vaccinated and unvaccinated states was compared over the following 25 weeks.
Among 53402 employees, 43857 (82.1%) had received the influenza vaccine by the end of the study.
Responding to the findings, Infowars noted that the study shows flu shots caused a “decrease in overall life expectancy.”
The outlet also commented that Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates stated during a 2010 TED Talk that “vaccines” can be used to reduce overpopulation.
This news follows a recent landmark court ruling on flu “vaccines.”
As Slay News previously reported, a U.S. federal court declared that influenza vaccines cause Guillain-Barré Syndrome, an incurable and life-threatening neurological disorder.
The ruling was issued by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.
The court sided with Alan Lien of Wisconsin, who had suffered life-changing injuries caused by a flu shot.
Lien was awarded $500,000 in damages for his vaccine-induced injury.
It marks a significant ruling under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).
In addition, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. warned in March that people who receive flu “vaccines” are “4.4 times more likely” to suffer a non-influenza infection.
Kennedy asserted that, after reviewing the official data, he wouldn’t get a flu shot “in a million years.”
While raising the alarm, Kennedy cited a bombshell Pentagon study by Wolfe.
The study revealed that those vaccinated against the flu were “36% more likely to get coronavirus.”
A world-renowned cardiologist is raising the alarm to warn the public that the “tsunami of vaccine deaths is not over” for those who received Covid injections.
The warning was issued by American cardiologist and epidemiologist Dr. Peter McCullough.
McCullough alerted the public shortly after he testified before the United States Senate as an expert witness on “vaccine” safety last week.
According to McCullough, one of America’s leading experts, subclinical myopericarditis may cause sudden cardiac arrests months to years after Covid “vaccination.”
Subclinical myopericarditis refers to inflammation of both the heart muscle (myocardium) and the sac surrounding the heart (pericardium).
It may be present without noticeable symptoms.
The condition restricts the heart’s ability to pump blood, leading to blood clots, strokes, cardiac arrests, and sudden death.
The first manifestations of micro-inflammatory scars in the heart can be fatal arrhythmias.
McCullough warns that many of the patients dying from subclinical myopericarditis are suffering fatal cardiac arrests that are so severe, doctors cannot resuscitate them.
He notes that even those who suffer cardiac arrests in hospitals cannot be saved, despite the methods of resuscitation available to doctors.
Dr. McCullough issued the chilling warning during an interview on LindellTV.
“We’re talking about Covid ‘vaccine’ myocarditis, which occurs with Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen, and Novavax,” McCullough explains.
“And what America learned is that it’s directly fatal and that, in some cases, patients are even in the hospital, they come in the hospital, and we can’t save them in the hospital.
“I have never seen any drug or biological product that’s that dangerous that it can kill a previously healthy normal person in the hospital, despite all of our resuscitative efforts.
“I’m greatly concerned,” Dr. McCullough noted.
“And the data I presented [to the Senate], that there is subclinical myopericarditis, that is, there’s minor heart injury.
“And that [heart injury] sets up people for the risk of sudden cardiac arrest, months to years after the shots.”
WATCH: Click on the Link below the image below t view the video…
The warning from McCullough comes amid mounting evidence linking Covid “vaccines” to deadly cardiac arrests.
As Slay News previously reported, a significant new study has found that Covid “vaccines” act as a trigger for sudden cardiac arrests in young people.
The study, conducted by some of Saudi Arabia’s most eminent scientists, found that the Covid injections create a ticking time bomb in young, healthy groups not typically associated with cardiac deaths.
The researchers found large numbers of young “vaccinated” people had vaccine-associated myocarditis and/or pericarditis.
Prior to appearing before the Senate last week, McCullough went on the record with explosive testimony under oath to declare that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are causing the “death of children.”
McCullough issued the warning during two public testimonies while urging officials to pull the “vaccines” from public use.
Footage of his testimonies was shared on social media by the McCullough Foundation.
While testifying before the Pennsylvania Senate, McCullough, one of America’s leading medical experts, told the story of two teenage boys who were killed by Covid “vaccines.”
“Two teenage boys who died on days three and four after the Pfizer vaccine,” McCullough recalled.
“The parents were horrified to find the children dead at home.
“Autopsies were performed, and the conclusion was crystal clear.
“The vaccines caused the deaths with massive heart inflammation and evidence of superimposed catecholamine injury on the heart.
“Fatal reports have come in from Choi and from Verma Choi in Korea, Verma from Washington University in St. Louis,” McCullough continued.
“It is clear that a vaccine is being pushed, is being encouraged, and mandated that, in fact, results in death of children.
“Results in death of children,” he emphasized.
“One death is too many.”
McCuullough continued by calling for “all current vaccines to be pulled from the market and undergo a very intensive review on safety and efficacy and figure out where the vaccine program has gone wrong.”
In another powerful testimony before the European Parliament in Strasbourg in France, McCullough warned that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are “not safe for human use.”
During a hearing chaired by MEP Christine Anderson, McCullough testified:
“I submit to you that the COVID-19 vaccines and all of their progeny and future boosters are not safe for human use.
“I implore you as a governing body – European Medicine Agency – to apply all pressure and due urgency to remove the COVID-19 vaccines from the market.”
A new German study has warned that there is a major information gap in the establishment medical industry regarding cases of “post-Covid vaccination syndrome.”
Wüstner found that, despite widespread “vaccination” during the COVID-19 pandemic and rising reports of lingering post-vaccine health issues, there is a surprising lack of scientific research on post-Covid vaccination syndrome (PCVS).
While it is commonly referred to as PCVS, the condition has also been referred to as vaccine-induced AIDS or Vaccine-Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (VAIDS).
However, health officials, corporate media outlets, and so-called “fact-checkers” have sought to label reports on PCVS as “conspiracy theories,” leaving patients in the shadows.
Professor Wüstner’s study sought to determine what peer-reviewed research exists on PCVS and assess the broader implications of its apparent absence.
This was a qualitative literature review and critical commentary.
Wüstner conducted a systematic search across four major academic databases—BASE, PubMed, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO.
She used search terms related to PCVS and patient experience.
The final search, completed on September 27, 2024, filtered out articles not directly focused on patient experience related to PCVS.
Non-peer-reviewed public discourse and commentary from online physician platforms (e.g., DocCheck) were also examined for illustrative purposes.
The study adhered to open science standards and was conducted without external funding or institutional bias.
The literature search revealed a striking vacuum: no peer-reviewed studies were found that directly examined the lived experience of PCVS patients in Germany.
This stands in contrast to robust literature on “long Covid,” vaccine safety, and adverse events of special interest (AESIs) such as myocarditis, thrombosis, and autoimmune phenomena.
The reports include references to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), and post-exertional malaise.
However, systematic clinical research on these patients was absent.
Instead, patient voices appeared primarily in the media, where individuals described symptoms such as chronic fatigue, dizziness, autoimmune disorders, neurological dysfunction, and cardiovascular disturbances.
Yet even in the media, coverage was sporadic.
Sleazy “fact-checkers” often pounce on such reports, likely leading to outlets fearing their reputations will be harmed for reporting on these cases.
Public and professional discourse often minimized PCVS or cast doubt on its legitimacy.
Some physicians are even attributing symptoms to psychological factors, hypochondria, or “misinformation.”
Vaccine-injured patients often experienced the action known as gaslighting, a form of psychological manipulation where someone is made to doubt their own sanity, perceptions, or memory.
An analysis of commentary on medical forums revealed a polarized and, at times, stigmatizing atmosphere.
Some professionals simply dismiss PCVS sufferers and those who acknowledge the lack of support patients face.
Despite more than 11,000 German citizens applying for vaccine injury compensation, and 467 cases officially recognized as of early 2024, most remain unresolved or denied.
The disconnect between political rhetoric promoting “vaccine” safety and patients’ lived experience was highlighted as a major driver of distress, alienation, and loss of trust.
Despite widespread reports of adverse events following Covid “vaccination” and thousands of patients reporting persistent symptoms, Germany has failed to produce research on the lived experience of those affected by post-Covid vaccination syndrome.
However, this issue is not limited to Germany, and it has been reflected in much of the scientific world.
This silence represents more than a scientific oversight; it reflects systemic biases, political discomfort, and institutional inertia.
Patients experiencing PCVS often face skepticism, delayed care, and stigmatization, deepening their suffering and undermining public trust.
The implications are urgent.
Without a scientific understanding of PCVS—its frequency, mechanisms, and treatment needs—affected individuals are marginalized, and vaccine safety oversight remains incomplete.
Public health credibility requires not only robust data collection but also the ethical obligation to listen.
Wüstner calls for immediate investment in PCVS research, healthcare infrastructure to support affected patients, and a more transparent and humane public health dialogue.
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has ordered pharmaceutical giants Pfizer and Moderna to issue warnings that their Covid mRNA “vaccines” carry a high risk of heart damage, particularly for young men.
The new guidance highlights the deadly risk of myocarditis from mRNA injections.
Myocarditis is an immune-driven inflammation of the heart muscle, called the myocardium.
The condition can reduce the heart’s ability to pump blood.
Myocarditis can cause blood clots, strokes, cardiac arrest, and ultimately, sudden death.
Doctors have been warning for some time that myocarditis acts as a ticking time bomb, as it’s often symptomless, meaning sufferers may not be aware that they have the condition until it’s too late.
The new ruling from the FDA has sparked renewed scrutiny over Covid “vaccine” safety policies.
According to a report from CBS News, the new guidelines signal growing federal scrutiny of Covid “vaccine” safety.
The FDA has now formally requested that Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech expand age-based warnings about heart damage caused by their mRNA vaccines.
In letters to the Big Pharma companies, the FDA cited recent data on myocarditis and pericarditis (another form of heart inflammation) that link to these conditions to mRNA injections.
Both manufacturers have been ordered to update product labels to reflect increased risk in males ages 16 to 25, up from the current ranges of 12–17 (Pfizer) and 18–24 (Moderna).
The letters were signed by Richard Forshee, acting director of the FDA’s Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance under the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
The agency’s move follows a 2024 FDA-funded study showing surging myocarditis cases following the second vaccine dose in young males.
The FDA-backed study, published in The Lancet, shows continued abnormalities in heart scans in some patients months after experiencing myocarditis post-vaccination.
The data cited by Forshee shows that nearly 60 percent of patients in a 333-person cohort still exhibited myocardial injury markers five months post-diagnosis.
“The clinical and prognostic significance of these findings is not known,” he wrote.
The new directive requires the vaccine makers to inform patients that the long-term significance of these MRI findings is unknown.
However, the heart abnormalities could reflect unresolved cardiac injury.
The department also emphasized that public awareness of these adverse events must be prioritized across both Pfizer and Moderna mRNA products.
In a statement, a Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson said:
“Americans deserve radical transparency around the safety and efficacy of Covid vaccines, and the FDA is delivering on its promise to do just that.”
The immune-driven condition has prompted fierce debate.
The scale of the crisis was amplified by a recent Senate hearing on “vaccine” safety and dissenting voices within the agency.
Meanwhile, FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and vaccine policy lead Dr. Vinay Prasad announced this week that Covid “booster” recommendations will now be limited to individuals over 65 or those with high-risk conditions.
The new rules continue to further shift the “vaccine” policy landscape.
South Korea is raising the alarm after the nation’s surging excess deaths have been linked to severe adverse events caused by Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
The alert was issued after the South Korean government published the findings of a bombshell new study on skyrocketing mortality rates among the Covid-vaccinated.
The study was conducted by leading scientists at the nation’s equivalent of the U.S. CDC, the Gyeonggi Infectious Disease Control Center (GIDCC).
The GIDCC’s Dr. Min Cheol Song led a team of researchers who hypothesized that the mortality rates are soaring among patients who experienced severe serious adverse events (SAEs) following a Covid “vaccination.”
The researchers investigated patients to see if mortality rates differ depending on whether they received a homologous (same vaccine platform) or heterologous (mix-and-match) prime-boost regimen.
The study was titled “Mortality in Severe Serious Adverse Events Following Heterologous and Homologous Prime-Boost Vaccination Strategies for SARS-CoV-2: A Retrospective Cohort Study.”
The results of the study have just been published in the medical journal PLOS One.
This retrospective cohort study analyzed 358 cases of severe SAEs temporally linked to Covid “vaccines” in South Korea’s Gyeonggi Province.
The researchers analysed official government data from February 2021 to March 2022.
Patients were grouped by vaccination strategy: homologous mRNA (n=220), homologous viral vector (n=75), and heterologous vector/mRNA (n=63).
Only patients who had received two or more doses were included.
Severe SAEs were defined as events resulting in death, ICU admission, life-threatening outcomes, permanent sequelae, or predefined adverse events of special interest.
The study assessed 42-day mortality risk and SAE etiology across the three vaccine strategy groups.
Patients in the heterologous group faced a 72% higher risk of death within 42 days of a severe adverse event compared to those who received homologous viral vector vaccines.
This group also showed significantly more deaths from respiratory (40.9%) and genitourinary (13.6%) conditions.
Mortality was lower among patients vaccinated at centralized centers than among those vaccinated at hospitals or long-term care facilities.
Notably, the heterologous group had more underlying conditions, including stroke, thyroid disorders, and chronic kidney disease.
This large provincial dataset reveals an elevated 42-day mortality risk among patients who experienced severe SAEs following heterologous prime-boost vaccination with a viral vector followed by mRNA.
Notably, deaths due to respiratory and genitourinary causes were disproportionately higher in this group.
This finding prompts questions about immunological overactivation or transient immune suppression post-vaccination.
The researchers warn that these findings underscore the need for risk stratification, especially in vulnerable populations like the elderly or those with pre-existing conditions.
While heterologous vaccination has been shown in multiple trials to enhance immunogenicity, this study suggests it may also raise safety concerns for certain subgroups.
Further investigation into biological mechanisms, such as lymphopenia and hyperreactivity, is warranted.
Renowned McCullough Foundation epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher also weighed in on the findings in a post on Substack.
Hulscher warns that the study reveals a “44.7% case-fatality rate within 42 days for serious COVID-19 vaccine injuries.”
He notes that deaths and SRAs are the “highest” in mix-and-match recipients and long-term care patients.
Out of 358 patients who suffered severe SAEs post-vaccination, 160 died within 42 days, yielding a 42-day case-fatality rate of 44.7%.
Breaking down the data by vaccine strategy, Hulscher notes:
Hulscher also explains that the findings reveal how “vaccine” sites are linked to increased death risk.
Patients vaccinated outside of centralized vaccination centers experienced significantly higher mortality after severe SAEs:
Medical institutions (e.g., clinics/hospitals):
aHR: 2.776 — Nearly 3x higher mortality
Nursing homes / long-term care:
aHR: 4.374 — Over 4x higher mortality
Community health centers:
aHR: 3.945 — Nearly 4x higher mortality
According to this Korean government-backed study, around 45% of those individuals may die within 42 days.
Hulscher notes that the study supports the conservative Covid “vaccine” death estimate of 470,000–600,000 Americans who received a Pfizer mRNA injection.
As Slay News previously reported, the head of Florida’s Department of Health, Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, recently revealed that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccine” killed over 470,000 Americans.
The alarming finding was revealed in Florida’s official data.
Florida’s Health Department collaborated with scientists from the world-renowned Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) to investigate surges in all-cause mortality rates in the state.
The researchers found that Pfizer’s mRNA “vaccine” in particular caused dramatic increases in deaths from all causes, including COVID-19, non-Covid, and cardiovascular.
Alarmingly, the study confirmed that Covid mRNA “vaccines” triggered a global surge in all-cause mortality rates.
The study found that people who got the Pfizer vaccine had a stunning 36% increase in their all-cause mortality when compared to those who received Moderna’s mRNA injection.
This increased risk lasts for at least a year after the “vaccine” was administered.
Yet, this risk was not an increase from the baseline, as all-cause mortality also spiked among those who received the Moderna “vaccines.”
The investigation was a retrospective, matched cohort study involving 1,470,100 noninstitutionalized adult Florida residents.
Republicans are celebrating after passing a provision that bans the use of taxpayer funds to pay for transgender treatments for adults and minors.
Medicaid will no longer pay for so-called “gender-affirming care” thanks to GOP-led legislation, Newsmax reported.
The “big, beautiful bill” passed in the House on Thursday.
It included the eleventh-hour addition banning federal funding for the controversial transgender surgery and other gender treatments.
An earlier version of the bill prohibited treatments for children under Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program.
It bars these federal programs from paying for hormone treatments, puberty blockers, and bodily mutilations for gender-confused minors.
A manager’s amendment later added to the bill extended the prohibition to recipients regardless of age.
The final bill passed 215-214, with all Democrats and just two Republicans voting against it.
House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris (R-MD) skirted the issue by voting “present.”
Predictably, the Left was not pleased with this provision and its implications.
The passage of this bill already triggered leftists as it codified much of President Donald Trump’s agenda.
However, it’s particularly offensive to people like Caleb Smith, director of LGBTQI+ policy at the Center for American Progress, because of the transgender care issue
Smith claims that the expansion is proof that banning gender affirming care outright was the goal all along.
“The bans on coverage for trans medical care were made so much worse, really, in the eleventh hour of this bill,” Smith said in a statement.
“And what a display of how it’s really not just about youth.
“It’s never just been about youth; It’s always been about curtailing access to medical care and bodily autonomy.
“All they had to do was strike ‘under 18′ from the bill, and now it’s everybody,” Smith went on.
“There’s a wildly strong case for this to be discrimination — it is discrimination.
“It really clearly violates equal protection because what we’re saying, essentially, is that if you are a cisgender man and you want access to testosterone, you can have it, but if you are a transgender man and you want access to testosterone, ‘Sorry, we’re not going to cover that,’” Smith claimed.
This discrimination argument would be credible if the treatments being proposed weren’t about genital mutilation and chemical castration.
There’s no reason these should be part of medical treatments, let alone those paid for by the American people, as some Republicans have pointed out.
Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) was the one who pushed through the ban for children after speaking out against it for years.
“The Crenshaw Amendment will become law — and it’s long overdue,” Crenshaw said.
“Gender transition procedures are the lobotomy of our generation.
“So-called ‘gender-affirming care’ isn’t healthcare — it’s fringe science with no proven benefit and massive risks,” Crenshaw asserted.
He touted his addition to the bill in a video posted to X on Wednesday.
“Just a year ago, few believed we could put a stop to the radical gender ideology being pushed on kids—especially the kind masquerading as medicine, funded with your tax dollars,” he said in the caption.
“But now, we’re about to do exactly that.”
Click on the ‘Link’below the ‘X’ image to view and read, as this image does not work to go directly to the ‘X’…
(Blogger Comment: These Globalists like Carney and Trudeau are literally insane and the sooner people recognise this and what the WEF puppets really are, the safer the world will become and be in the future…fact not fiction…)
The globalist Canadian government has launched a campaign to promote a new push to begin euthanizing children with mental health issues without their parents’ consent.
The new scheme seeks to open up the country’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) to children.
Liberal Party Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government describes those children who would be eligible for “assisted suicide” using the alarmingly vague term “mature minors.”
According to the Canadian government’s promotional material, children with mental health issues would be euthanized without parental consent under the expanded laws.
The move to expand the eugenics programs to “mature minors” was revealed in flyers distributed by the Canadian government.
Jasmin Laine, the host of “Over Opinionated,” shared the flyers on social media that are being circulated in Manitoba.
“You have to be a special kind of demonic to advocate for MAID for young, vulnerable people and people who are suicidal.
“Imagine walking into a clinic for help, and being told the world would be better off without you… that you should cave to the lies the devil on your shoulder is telling you, and it would be more affordable for Canada’s healthcare system if you were gone.”
Laine has herself participated in “recovery plans and treatment after trying to end it” after her partner of ten years committed suicide.
“There is nothing compassionate about this—it is pure evil,” she concluded her post.
The flyers explain that the government of PM Carney, a World Economic Forum (WEF) “agenda contributor,” (but a lot higher than that, as he was amember of the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum (WEF)until January 2025 and is even more manevolvent than the Trudeau against humanity…which says a great deal more about the ‘fear’ we should have for Carney the Globalist puppet, just like Trudeau) and has recommended that citizens deemed “mature minors” must be allowed to qualify for euthanasia.
“A mature minor is a child or teen who is deemed capable of making a decision for MAiD,” the paper states.
“This would essentially remove the minimum age of eligibility.
“The [government] committee also suggested parents may not be consulted and wouldn’t need to consent to their child’s death via MAiD.”
However, the vagueness of the term “mature” could open up the scheme to children of all ages.
The flyer goes on to argue that, according to the Canadian government, killing children without parental consent is an example of protecting the most vulnerable citizens.
“Children are uniquely vulnerable,” the informational pamphlet says.
“Canada’s first priority must be to provide high-quality medical care for children.”
Click on the link below the X Image to view and read…
Beginning in March 2027, the government will begin euthanizing Canadians suffering from mental illnesses.
Continuing to bizarrely invert reality, the pamphlet states:
“Hopelessness and a desire to end one’s life can be a symptom of some mental illnesses.”
The flyer continues by promoting suicide as a faster alternative than waiting for medical treatments.
Essentially, the government is advising citizens that suicide is more efficient than the Canadian healthcare system.
“One in 10 people will wait more than 4 months for counselling,” the document reads.
“The waiting period for MAID is only 3 months.
“We are already hearing about people asking for MAID because they do not have the support needed to live.”
The Dying With Dignity Canada (DWDC) website notes that, currently, “Canada’s law on medical assistance in dying (MAiD) requires that applicants must be 18 years of age or older.”
“In many jurisdictions across Canada, mature minors already have the right to make important decisions regarding their healthcare.”
“Dying With Dignity Canada believes mature minors should be allowed the right to choose MAiD,” the site continues.
Next, the website cites a 2023 Ipsos poll claiming that “71% of people across Canada support the ability for mature minors to request and be considered for MAID, if all other criteria are met under the law.”
This troubling push by the Canadian government highlights the anti-human agenda being pushed by the globalist ruling class.
In a landmark ruling, a U.S. federal court has declared that influenza vaccines cause Guillain-Barré Syndrome, an incurable and life-threatening neurological disorder.
The ruling was issued by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.
The court sided with Alan Lien of Wisconsin, who had suffered life-changing injuries caused by a flu shot.
Lien was awarded $500,000 in damages for his vaccine-induced injury.
It marks a significant ruling under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).
The judgment follows Lien’s diagnosis of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS).
The court determined that Lien’s GBS was caused by a flu shot received in October 2019.
Represented by attorney Randy Knutson of the Knutson Casey Law Firm, Lien filed his petition in October 2021.
The Vaccine Court ruled in February 2023 that Lien was entitled to compensation.
A final settlement, agreed upon in March 2025, provides a lump sum payment to cover damages.
Lien received compensation for lost income after he was forced to leave his job as a Frito-Lay driver due to the condition.
“This decision acknowledges the serious, life-changing impact of GBS and helps provide much-needed support to Mr. Lien,” said Knutson.
The VICP was established in 1986.
The program is funded by a federal excise tax on vaccines.
The VICP serves as a no-fault alternative to traditional legal action for vaccine-related injuries.
Cases are adjudicated by the Vaccine Court in Washington, D.C.
The news comes amid growing safety concerns about “routine” flu vaccines.
Following a major study, the world-renowned Cleveland Clinic recently confirmed that influenza vaccines are ineffective at preventing flu cases and only increase the risk of harm.
The verdict on the flu vaccine from the Cleveland Clinic’s large-scale prospective cohort study has delivered a shocking blow to the mass vaccination agenda.
The study found that not only was the vaccine ineffective, but it was also associated with a significantly increased risk of infection.
The findings of the study led by Dr. Nabin Shrestha, the head of the Cleveland Clinic’s Departments of Infectious Diseases, were published in the MedRvix journal.
The study tracked over 53,000 employees during the 2024–2025 respiratory viral season.
The researchers sought to assess whether the influenza vaccine offered protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza infections.
The results raise serious questions about this season’s flu vaccine and the broader assumptions behind annual mandates.
In addition, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. warned in March that people who receive flu “vaccines” are “4.4 times more likely” to suffer a non-influenza infection.
Kennedy asserted that, after reviewing the official data, he wouldn’t get a flu shot “in a million years.”
While raising the alarm, Kennedy cited a bombshell Pentagon study by Wolfe.
The study revealed that those vaccinated against the flu were “36% more likely to get coronavirus.”
World Freedom 