Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair is calling on his globalist allies in the UK’s socialist government to begin rolling out digital IDs for the general public.
According to Blair, pushing citizens into adopting a digital ID and “wallet” will help the ruling Labour Party “flush out” populism among the population.
Blair, a World Economic Forum (WEF) “agenda contributor,” claims that digital ID and artificial intelligence (AI) are the golden ticket to what he calls “the holy grail of governing.”
Along with his ally, current Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Blair is pushing for the UK to advance the rollout of digital IDs.
Starmer is now pledging to transform the UK into an “AI superpower.”
Speaking to The Times, Blair laid out his vision for the public to be tied down with AI-driven technology.
“You’ve got to reorder the Government around this technology revolution,” Blair proclaimed.
Of course, Blair insists that he’s only pushing an AI-powered digital “wallet” for “efficiency.”
“You should be able to have a state that is smaller, more strategic, and providing greater efficiency at lower cost,” he explained.
Blair added that technology is “the instrument that allows you to do it.”
He’s calling on Starmer to push the government to make digital identity systems a cornerstone of its modernization efforts.
Stamer’s government has already announced plans to roll out a digital “wallet” in June.
The “wallet” will allow people to store official documents—like driving licenses—on their phones.
However, this is just the beginning, according to Blair.
“There’s a big debate coming down the line,” he warned.
“How much privacy are you prepared to trade for efficiency?”
Blair is confident the public will happily surrender their personal freedom in exchange for smoother interactions with the state.
“My view is that people are actually prepared to trade quite a lot,” he declared.
Blair envisions this new digital ID regime as a multi-purpose tool to control immigration, ensure public services are accessed only by those entitled to them, and prevent unauthorized migrants from gaming the system.
“It’s sending a signal that there’s no point in thinking you’re going to come here and disappear into a kind of grey economy,” he told The Times.
However, after touting the “efficiency” benefits of his plan, Blair then revealed that digital ID can be used as a weapon to “flush out” his party’s opponents.
“It will also flush out a lot of people who want to talk about issues like immigration or benefit fraud but don’t actually have the means to get to the end,” he mused.
The real utility of digital ID, beyond supposed “efficiency,” is to expose and eliminate populism.
Meanwhile, Starmer’s government is pressing forward with its digital initiatives.
The push for digital IDs, biometric tracking, and centralized data systems has always been justified by appeals to security, efficiency, and progress.
And yet, history tells us that governments rarely — if ever — tighten their grip on information without also tightening their grip on power.
Blair’s vision is clear: a frictionless, AI-powered governance model where the state operates like a tech giant, and the citizen is merely a user navigating its services.
Whether the public is as enthusiastic about this brave new world remains to be seen.
Blogger Comment: Western poltical leaders for the past 35 years have cause western civilization to fail and they are still doing it for their vastly wealthy Globalist masters in Davos and where I cannot understand why people think that western social and economic decline and destruction is natural and the only thing that I can think of is, that they are completely ignorant of what is happening and fully brainwashed by our leaders in the West and the Globalist controlled MSM..
In a move that reads more like Orwell than Westminster, the British government has officially labeled nearly half of its own population as extremists.
However, the aggressive label was not for plotting violence, but for holding the audacious belief that Western civilization is worth preserving.
The UK’s Prevent anti-terrorism program now classifies “cultural nationalism,” the idea that mass migration and lack of cultural integration are threatening British identity, as a gateway to terrorism.
Yet, that’s not a fringe conspiracy theory.
That’s in government training materials, which warn that citizens who believe Western culture is “under threat” should be treated as potential radical extremists requiring “intervention.”
Welcome to the UK in 2025, where patriotism is now probable cause.
“This is a matter of serious concern,” wrote Lord Toby Young, general secretary of the Free Speech Union, in a letter to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper.
Young slammed the government for expanding the definition of extremism to include perfectly lawful, mainstream views.
And it’s not just hypothetical.
Young noted that even former Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick, who warned against “excessive, uncontrolled migration,” and Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who said immigration could turn Britain into “an island of strangers,” would now be flagged as radicals.
Britain’s own government leaders would be deemed terrorist-adjacent under their own anti-radicalization rubric.
The UK’s program, which failed to stop mass killer Axel Rudakubana despite multiple referrals, has instead turned its sights on political dissenters, retirees, and anyone who values British heritage.
Among those flagged by the scheme were:
Julian Foulkes, a retired police officer, was arrested for a social media post and interrogated for having a “very Brexity” book collection. He later received £20,000 in compensation and an apology.
Allison Pearson, a Daily Telegraph columnist, was questioned by police over a tweet criticizing pro-Hamas protests.
A 24-year-old autistic man was referred to Prevent for visiting right-leaning comedy sites and reading anti-trans content.
And in 2024 alone, the UK government arrested 1,177 people for “offensive” online posts under the Communications Act 2003, with penalties reaching up to seven years in prison.
One woman in Cheshire was arrested for an immigration post deemed “inaccurate.”
A man near Liverpool was charged with “racial hatred” over a post on X.
Neither of them threatened violence, however.
“The police showed up at my door like I was a terrorist,” the woman told The Telegraph.
Meanwhile, British authorities let Hamas flag-wavers and leftist street rioters march freely, claiming it’s all protected expression.
But don’t think this insanity stops on British soil, as America has been right behind.
Former President Joe Biden’s administration was also quietly laying the groundwork for its own domestic “thought police” regime:
A 2022 DHS bulletin flagged Americans with “grievances over immigration or cultural change” as potential violent extremists, without citing any crimes.
A 2023 FBI whistleblower revealed “threat tags” created to track conservatives, parents at school board meetings, and Covid policy skeptics.
The White House worked directly with Big Tech to flag posts for removal. In 2021, then-Press Secretary Jen Psaki boasted, “We’re flagging problematic posts for Facebook.”
A 2024 House Judiciary report confirmed Biden’s team pressured Meta and X to silence conservative voices, medical experts, and dissenters, even when no laws were broken.
“I was shadowbanned for questioning mask mandates,” said Dr. Jane Ruby, a medical commentator with 300,000 X followers.
“No warning. No explanation. Just silenced.”
Even travelers weren’t safe.
The TSA’s “Quiet Skies” program used algorithms to tag Americans for enhanced screening based on “ideological beliefs” and social media posts, again, with no criminal wrongdoing required.
In a 2024 post on X, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) sounded the alarm:
“Biden’s DHS is treating dissent like terrorism.
“It’s a gross overreach.”
The UK has gone full dystopia under the far-left socialist Labour Party.
The nation’s government is branding traditional values and national pride as precursors to terror.
Meanwhile, officials are excusing actual extremists in the streets.
When loving your country becomes evidence of extremism, free society isn’t just under threat, it’s already been breached.
The transnationalist elite would rather criminalize concern than admit failure.
But Americans should take the UK’s fate as a warning: If you don’t stand up for liberty, you’ll be arrested for exercising it.
A new Covid “vaccine” is advancing through clinical trials in the United States, but this time it’s not a shot in the arm, it’s a “breathable” mist that “vaccinates” people by entering the lungs.
In what researchers are calling a “first-of-its-kind” study, a team at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, led by Dr. Paul Spearman, has released early trial results on a Covid “vaccine” spray.
The study was funded by CyanVac LLC and published in Science Advances.
The candidate, called CVXGA1, is delivered via nasal spray, directly into the mucous membranes.
The atomized “vaccine” is being touted as the next frontier in pandemic “prevention.”
However, while legacy media and government researchers call the results “encouraging,” the trial and the technology behind it raise major concerns about safety, transparency, and future public health policy, particularly among Americans who’ve already been burned by broken vaccine promises.
The study involved just 72 people, aged 12–53, and aimed to test how the human body responds to live virus vectors sprayed directly into the respiratory system.
Participants received either low or high doses of the nasal vaccine and were monitored for adverse events and immune responses.
Among those who received higher doses, mild side effects such as runny nose (25%), headache (25%), and nausea (8%) were most common.
According to the study authors, no fevers or grade 3 adverse events were reported, and no hospitalizations occurred.
But even with the optimistic headline, the details paint a more complicated picture.
While researchers highlight a 67% relative reduction in symptomatic infections in high-dose recipients compared to the low-dose group, serum antibody levels were modest, and neutralizing antibodies, the ones that matter most, were rare, showing up in less than 13% of participants.
That means most of the immune “response” touted by researchers came not from traditional antibodies, but from mucosal immunity (IgA/IgG in the nose) and T-cell activation.
These responses are far more difficult to measure and far less understood in terms of long-term protection.
In short, the vaccine may be generating immune “activity,” but it’s unclear what kind, for how long, or whether it translates to meaningful protection.
Meanwhile, the trials are raising serious concerns about efforts to roll out “airborne vaccines.”
The use of live virus vectors to deliver genetic material into the respiratory system poses serious ethical and safety questions, particularly when viral RNA was detected in recipients’ nasal passages just two days after administration.
While researchers insist the vaccine strain remained “genetically stable,” the fact that viral genetic material was detectable at all will alarm those already concerned about shedding, unintended exposure, or mandated transmission-based vaccine delivery.
Moreover, CVXGA1 is based on a parainfluenza virus vector, which raises the possibility of repurposing or expanding similar delivery systems for other vaccines, or potentially even non-consensual public health interventions in the future.
The trial was fully funded by CyanVac LLC, and several of the authors are either employees or equity holders in the company.
One researcher has accepted grants or consulting fees from major pharmaceutical players, including Moderna, GSK, and Sanofi.
This isn’t an independent study.
It’s corporate-funded research conducted by those who stand to benefit from the product’s success.
Even more concerning was that the trial lacked a placebo group, and participants were not randomized.
Many had prior Covid infections or mRNA “vaccinations,” which muddies the waters on what immune responses came from the nasal “vaccine” and which came from previous exposure.
Without a proper control group, how can Americans trust the claims being made?
Intranasal vaccines represent a paradigm shift in how public health officials and pharmaceutical companies could approach vaccination in the future.
These tools don’t just target disease; they target behavior.
If nasal sprays become normalized, it raises the risk of bypassing medical consent, eroding bodily autonomy, and potentially enabling population-wide exposure through aerosols.
And with larger trials already underway, including one aimed at over 10,000 participants by 2027, there’s no sign this is slowing down.
The trial for CVXGA1 may be promoted as a success, but beneath the headlines lies a troubling trend: new, poorly understood “vaccine” technologies with limited transparency and fast-tracked regulatory backing.
For vaccine-injured individuals and those who’ve fought for medical choice, the message is clear: the fight isn’t over, and airborne vaccine delivery may be the next battleground.
Chilling data is sending shockwaves through armed forces and health circles alike after evidence from the official military database revealed that deaths and injuries are surging among American service members who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
American attorney Todd Callender is sounding the alarm over the discovery, warning that the death rate among U.S. military service members jumped an astonishing 1,100% in the first 10 months of 2021.
Callender has been working with Scott Davison, CEO of the insurer OneAmerica, to investigate internal insurance industry data.
They have uncovered evidence of surging deaths and injuries among the general public since the mass vaccination campaign was rolled out in early 2021.
Excess mortality in the U.S. military started skyrocketing shortly after the Biden administration was forcing experimental mRNA Covid shots on young troops.
Callender points directly to data from the Pentagon’s own Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) as proof that something catastrophic happened after the vaccine mandates were rolled out.
And the numbers, he says, don’t lie.
During an interview on TruNews, he reveals that the data shows that excess deaths spiked dramatically in 2021, when compared to 2020, and continued surging from there.
“We know from the DMED database, the military’s database… that in 10 months of 2021, so not even the complete year, all causes of morbidity and excess mortality had increased, according to the military’s own numbers, by 1100% over 2020,” Callender explained in a recent video.
According to the attorney, the deaths and medical conditions occurred primarily in young, healthy military members between the ages of 18 and 40.
He added that despite criminal complaints being filed on behalf of roughly 20,000 servicemen, no real investigation has been launched by the Department of Defense or any federal agency.
“That’s called a conspiracy; it’s a very grand conspiracy,” Callender declared.
The timeline raises serious questions: Reports of myocarditis, a deadly form of heart inflammation, began surfacing in early 2021.
The reports exploded just weeks after Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA shots were authorized for use.
Israel had already warned of myocarditis risks in February of that year.
The Pentagon said it was reviewing at least 14 cases.
However, to this day, no formal admission or accountability has come from military leadership.
One Navy surgeon, Dr. Lee Merritt, went public in August 2021 to sound the alarm about what she was seeing in real-time, as Slay News reported.
“Dr. Merritt recently addressed the American Frontline Doctors and discussed how all through 2020 there were only 20 deaths among all active duty military personnel related to Covid,” reportedVaccine Impact.
“However, there are now many reports of tumors and over 80 cases of myocarditis… following the COVID-19 shots given to the military.”
Merritt didn’t hold back:
“With the vaccine program, we’ve ostensibly killed more of our young active duty people than Covid did.”
And Callender, backed by years of legal and scientific scrutiny, didn’t mince words either.
“This is genocide; we said it from the beginning,” Callender said.
“One of the easy ways to look at this is really simple.
“If you look at all the documentations, Pfizer documentation, we did mass spectrometry on their vials, we know what’s in these things…”
Lipid nanoparticles are microscopic delivery systems.
Callender warns that they were designed to “bypass” the immune system and deliver gene-altering proteins.
“They couldn’t slip this lipid nanoparticles… little bombers that carry pathogenic proteins to effectuate gene modification in the individual,” he says.
“In order to get those lipid nanoparticles past cellular defense, your body’s natural defense, they have to disarm your immune system. And they did that.”
Callender then delivered perhaps the most explosive statement yet:
Despite the gravity of these allegations, corporate media outlets remain silent.
No major network has covered the DMED revelations, and neither the CDC nor the Department of Defense has publicly addressed the catastrophic surge in military medical data.
The silence is deafening.
As more insiders come forward, the question grows louder: How many lives were sacrificed in the name of “public health”?
Blogger Comment: Euthanasia is what the Government of the United Kingdom is presently signing up to and where it has only taken Canada 9-years from 2016 to get to this relatively ‘short’ period in time where tens of thousands a year are being euthanized from zero in 2016, but what do you expect when their Political Leaders (Carney and Trudeau before him) are The World Economic Forum (The WEF) in Davos senior members and where Carney was a Founding member of the WEF Foundation and only good at counting your money as a central bank governor and obeying the WEF’s commands in every detail…, and where WEF if you did not know, have been promoting Euthanasia for decades with Bill Gates, another senior WEF member and like his father before him, who was a major player in the USA’s Euthanasia proponents group and son like father really, but seriously worse…and respectfully the world will learn eventually and what is really happening around the world against humanity…where the WEF have stated that they want to reduce humanity down to a mere 500 million from 8.23 billion now…
The Canadian government is preparing to euthanize a disabled woman because she can’t afford housing that is suitable for her condition.
The disabled 32-year-old woman, known only as Denise to protect her identity, is now in the final stages of the process and is preparing for her medically assisted death appointment.
Doctors will soon pull the plug on Denise after she suffered seven futile years of applying for affordable housing in Toronto.
Exposure to chemicals that commonly linger in households, like laundry detergents and air fresheners, triggers debilitating symptoms.
Her skin develops rashes, she suffers blinding headaches that can provoke temporary paralysis, and the constant risk of an anaphylactic episode looms over her.
It is possible for a person with her condition to live an almost-normal life if the correct precautions are taken and her home is modified to reduce contamination and exposure.
However, modifying a home in this way and receiving treatment for the condition can be costly.
Yet, for Denise, who is on a low income, securing suitable housing has become a seemingly impossible pursuit.
Due to Denise being unable to afford the right housing for her condition, doctors have put her forward for Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program.
Denise’s story first emerged in a CTV National News article published this spring.
But now, it’s beginning to dull and she has lost hope of finding a home, leaving her to continue on the path to euthanasia.
“I’ve been given this quasi hope where I see a way that I could survive now … the pieces just aren’t adding up and the money is the clock,” she said.
More than 1,000 donors raised money in the spring to help Denise secure permanent housing in a wheelchair-accessible space with uncontaminated air.
But six months later, she is still searching for a home.
She says her funds are now running out and the clock is ticking as pressure mounts for her to agree to “assisted suicide.”
“I currently have two months left,” Denise said, nodding to her remaining pool of money.
“I have requested final approval for MAiD,” she said.
Denise said there is only final paperwork standing between her and a medically-assisted death.
Funeral arrangements have been made and a power of attorney has been signed.
Once the forms are filed, Denise will enter a 90-day wait period before MAiD takes place.
“It’s the only option,” Denise said.
Slay News has previously reported on Canada’s radical euthanasia laws.
MAiD was legalized in Canada in 2016 for candidates whose natural death was imminent and that wanted to die quickly, rather than live through the pain.
However, it was later amended to include Canadians enduring an “intolerable” and “irreversible” illness, disease, or disability.
The laws are now being expanded to include people with minor conditions, mentally ill patients, and those who are poor or homeless.
A recent case was recently reported in which a man was euthanized against his family’s wishes over a problem with his hearing.
Aside from bouts of depression over his hearing, Alan Nichols, 61, was otherwise healthy.
However, his brother claimed doctors railroaded Nichols into killing himself.
The age limit is also changing to expand the program from adults to also include “mature” children.
Meanwhile, as Canada continues to expand its euthanasia laws, plans to start euthanizing infants are also gaining support.
Recently, Live Action News reported that the Quebec College of Physicians has made a recommendation that infants who experience “grave malformations” where life expectancy is “basically nil” should be eligible for euthanasia under Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) laws.
A report from the National Post reveals that some parents are already asking for their children to be euthanized.
According to the Post, some Canadian doctors have said, “that specific and explicit requests for MAID have come from parents involving very young children.”
Dr. David Lysecki, a pediatric palliative care specialist at McMaster University’s department of pediatrics said that some parents are seeking death for their child, even though with surgery and life support “we can sometimes keep their body alive for years.
“But that child would never be able to process the outside world in a cognizant way.”
“Some families ask, ‘If they’re going to die at the end of this anyway, maybe three weeks from now, and we don’t believe they’re going to have meaningful positive experiences between then and now, why must we all have to go through this period of waiting,’” he said.
It is now so easy for a person to be euthanized in Canada, that allegations are emerging that the Canadian government-run socialized healthcare system is now euthanizing the country’s sick and poor people rather than treating them.
Blogger Comment: Euthanasia is what the Government of the United Kingdom is presently signing up to and where it has only taken Canada 9-years from 2016 to get to this relatively ‘short’ period in time where tens of thousands a year are being euthanized from zero in 2016, but what do you expect when their Political Leaders (Carney and Trudeau before him) are The World Economic Forum (The WEF) in Davos senior members and where Carney was a Founding member of the WEF Foundation and only good at counting your money as a central bank governor and obeying the WEF’s commands in every detail…, and where WEF if you did not know, have been promoting Euthanasia for decades with Bill Gates, another senior WEF member and like his father before him, who was a major player in the USA’s Euthanasia proponents group and son like father really, but seriously worse…and respectfully the world will learn eventually and what is really happening around the world against humanity…where the WEF have stated that they want to reduce humanity down to a mere 500 million from 8.2 billion now…
Left-wing newspaper The New York Times has called for mentally ill people to be euthanized, arguing that the expansion of “assisted suicide” is “moral progress.”
In a recent article, the NY Times makes its case for people “suffering from psychological torture” to be put out of their misery.
Ironically, while pushing for expanded “suicide” laws, the Times also admits many who experience intense mental suffering eventually “find themselves grateful for their lives once the suicidal moment or attempt has passed.”
The piece, titled “Medical Assistance in Dying Should Not Exclude Mental Illness,” was penned by Canadian writer Clancy Martin.
Martin begins by describing his own personal suicide attempts when he was younger.
“My first attempt to kill myself was when I was a child,” he writes.
“I tried again as a teenager; as an adult, I’ve attempted suicide repeatedly and in a variety of ways.”
Despite his failed efforts, the author admits to being grateful for having survived each attempt.
“And yet, as a 55-year-old white man (a member of one of the groups at the highest risk for suicide in America) and the happily married father of five children, I am thankful that I am incompetent at killing myself,” he writes.
Martin, who serves as a professor of philosophy at the University of Missouri in Kansas City, expressed his belief that “almost every suicide can be prevented, including my own, with access to good behavioral health systems.”
“I have talked many, many people ‘off the ledge,’” he added.
Martin notes how Canada has been rapidly expanding the legal right to request medical assistance in dying (MAID).
Slay News has previously reported on Canada’s radical euthanasia laws.
MAID was legalized in Canada in 2016 for candidates whose natural death was imminent and that wanted to die quickly, rather than live through the pain.
However, it was later amended to include Canadians enduring an “intolerable” and “irreversible” illness, disease, or disability.
The laws are now being expanded to include people with minor conditions, mentally ill patients, and those who are poor or homeless.
A recent case was recently reported in which a man was euthanized against his family’s wishes over a problem with his hearing.
Aside from bouts of depression over his hearing, Alan Nichols, 61, was otherwise healthy.
However, his brother claimed doctors railroaded Nichols into killing himself.
The age limit is also changing to expand the program from adults to also include “mature” children.
Meanwhile, as Canada continues to expand its euthanasia laws, plans to start euthanizing infants are also gaining support, as Slay News reported.
Recently, Live Action News reported that the Quebec College of Physicians has made a recommendation that infants who experience “grave malformations” where life expectancy is “basically nil” should be eligible for euthanasia under Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) laws.
A report from the National Post reveals that some parents are already asking for their children to be euthanized.
According to the Post, some Canadian doctors have said, “that specific and explicit requests for MAID have come from parents involving very young children.”
In his article for the NY Times, Martin describes the acceptance of such legislation — which “has been spreading” to many other countries and districts — as “moral progress.”
“When a person is in unbearable physical agony, suffering from a terminal disease, and death is near, surely it is compassionate to help end the pain, if the person so chooses,” he writes.
He then highlights the current debate in Canada surrounding the inclusion in MAID of those “living with severe, incurable mental illness” — a part of the law scheduled to take effect next year.
Yet, despite Martin admitting that “many people who want to end their lives because of intense mental suffering find themselves grateful for their lives once the suicidal moment or attempt has passed,” he still promotes the idea of euthanizing those suffering from mental illness.
“One might expect that as someone who has repeatedly attempted suicide and yet is happy to be alive, I am opposed to euthanasia on psychiatric grounds,” he writes.
“But it is because of my intimacy with suicide that I believe people must have this right.”
Though requests for euthanasia on psychiatric grounds should be treated with “particular care” because of our uncertainty surrounding psychological suffering, Martin insists that the lack of clarity “is in fact a reason to endorse a prudent policy of assisted suicide for at least some psychiatric cases.”
“When people are desperate for relief from torment that we do not understand well enough to effectively treat, giving them the right and the expert medical assistance to end that misery is caring for them,” he writes.
He also notes that major depression “is one of the psychiatric diagnoses most common to suicidal people, and approximately two-thirds of people who die by suicide are depressed at the time of their death.”
In addition, he claims, “the knowledge that there is a way out may alleviate the terrifying claustrophobia so common to suicidal people like me and to people in acute suffering more generally.”
According to Martin, when people are given the right to physician-assisted suicide, “they may opt not to use it.”
“People should be granted the right to this assistance,” he argues.
“It does not follow they will exercise that right.”
“If we are willing to help people end their physical suffering by assisting their death, can we in good conscience deny them that help for their mental suffering?” he asks.
Canadian religious leaders have expressed growing concern over the looming activation of new policies that would allow those suffering from mental illness to be euthanized with considerable speed.
The policies will see people killed just 90 days after two doctors approve a request for assisted suicide.
In November, leading Canadian fashion retailer La Maison Simons launched an ad campaign titled “All Is Beauty” that was accused of “promoting” and “romanticizing” assisted suicide.
WATCH:
Canadian clothes retailer Simons is marketing their products with suicide. Normalizing assisted suicide as a treatment for mental illness, PTSD and even children with defects is the next step for depopulation. pic.twitter.com/EFwsJaSpaY
In the roughly three-minute clip, a now-deceased terminally-ill woman in her 30s named Jennyfer describes her coming to grips with the choice to end her life.
She talks about seeing the “beauty” all around as she presents euthanasia as “the most beautiful exit.”
Blogger Comment: And this is what the United Kingdom is now signing up to and where it has only taken The Netherlands 23-years from 1st April 2002 to get to this relatively ‘short’ point in time, but what do you expect when the EU Commission Leaders are The World Economic Forum (The WEF) in Davos senior members and where Ursula von der Leyen (from a German aristocratic family, not from the common people and were her grandfather Joachim von der Leyen, was a prominent figure in the Nazi regime. He served as the highest civilian administrator in the District of Galicia during the Holocaust. He was involved in the atrocities committed against the Jewish population, including overseeing forced labor camps, extermination camps, and the Lviv Ghetto, where an estimated 540,000 people were murdered – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_der_Leyen_(family_from_Krefeld)#:~:text=Von%20der%20Leyen%20was%20informed,der%20Leyen%20II%20in%201970 ) is in fact a senior executive member of the WEF.. and where WEF members if you did not know it, have been promoting Euthanasia for decades with Bill Gates, another senior WEF member and like his father before him, who was a major player in the USA’s Euthanasia proponents group and son like father really, but seriously worse…and respectfully the world will learn eventually and what is really happening around the world against humanity…
Several Dutch citizens who had autism or other intellectual disabilities have been euthanizedby doctors in the Netherlands under the authority of the nation’s globalist government.
In recent years, a number of Dutch patients have died by physician-assisted suicide after doctors determined their afflictions were untreatable obstacles to a normal life, researchers found.
According to a Kingston University investigation of Dutch euthanasia cases, nearly 40 people who were identified as being autistic or intellectually disabled were legally euthanized in the Netherlands between 2012 and 2021.
The UK study found that five people younger than 30 who were killed had cited autism as the sole or major reason for their decision to go through with euthanasia.
With those cases, experts have questioned whether the law allowing doctors to kill suicidal patients via lethal injections has strayed too far from its initial intentions when passed in 2002.
When the laws were first introduced, they were meant to offer terminally ill patients an option when their life had become too unbearable due to the pain of their untreatable illness.
Kasper Raus, an ethicist and public health professor at Belgium’s Ghent University, said the types of patients seeking out physician-assisted suicide have changed greatly over the past two decades in both the Netherlands and Belgium, where it is also legal.
As Slay News has reported, Belgium has now euthanized a staggering 27,000 citizens since its laws were relaxed.
When the Netherlands became the first country to legalize human euthanasia, the debate focused on people with cancer — not those with autism, Raus said.
Patients must meet strict requirements including suffering from an incurable illness that causes “unbearable” physical or mental anguish to be eligible for euthanasia.
However, doctors ultimately decide who qualifies.
In the roughly 10-year period the study focused on, nearly 60,000 people decided to die via euthanasia in the Netherlands, according to the Dutch government’s euthanasia review committee.
Of those deaths, the committee has released documents and data on 900 cases in an effort of transparency.
Kingston University researchers looked at those 900 cases and found 39 of them had autism or an intellectual disability.
Of the 39, 18 were younger than 50 years old.
Many of the patients cited a number of mental, physical, and age-related ailments as the reason for ending their lives — including unbearable loneliness.
Eight people, however, named the sole cause of their suffering as factors related to their intellectual disability — such as social isolation, a lack of coping strategies, an inability to adjust to change, or oversensitivity to stimuli.
One of the report’s main authors Irene Tuffrey-Wijne, a palliative care specialist at Kingston University, questioned the ethics of ending the lives of the autistic.
“There’s no doubt in my mind these people were suffering,” she said.
“But is society really OK with sending this message, that there’s no other way to help them and it’s just better to be dead?”
One of the eight people cited in the study was an autistic man in his 20s.
He reported feeling unhappy since childhood and was regularly bullied, according to his case notes.
The man “longed for social contacts but was unable to connect with others” and eventually decided he wanted to die because “having to live on this way for years was an abomination.”
Dutch psychiatrist Dr. Bram Sizzo was disturbed by the trend.
“Some of them are almost excited at the prospect of death,” Sizoo said.
“They think this will be the end of their problems and the end of their family’s problems.”
In a third of cases, Dutch doctors determined that there was “no prospect of improvement” for people with autism and intellectual disabilities, according to the study.
The director of Cambridge University’s Autism Research Centre, Simon Baron-Cohen, worried that people with such disabilities may not fully grasp the decision to end their lives.
He called it “abhorrent” that they were not offered more support and were instead euthanized.
Blogger Comment: This is not over the top that many ignorant and uninformed people will think, but even the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and its Intel agency DEAGEL have known about this world changing event right back to 2013, when the CIA Agency published their projections of the unprecedented population decline by the end of 2025 in western nations, where those in the East would not be affected on bit and the reason for that is as we now know, only ‘WESTERN’ nations received the vast majority of these untested and experimental mRNA “Vaccines”, as the West was the only nation that could afford and pay for them…therefore western nations were targeted by our own governments and our own top health chiefs for their controllers and that was not the people who voted these people into power…
One of the world’s leading vaccinologists is warning the public that Covid mRNA “vaccines” were the trigger for a looming global mass depopulation event.
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, a former Gates Foundation “vaccine” scientist, warns that the human race is facing a deadly “spectacular wave of hyperacute systemic disease” that will wipe out billions of people who received mRNA injections.
Bossche reveals that Covid mRNA shots were designed with a “delay” that triggers an “evolutionary mechanism.”
He warns that the coming devastation caused by Covid injections will be “unprecedented in the history of clinical virology and underappreciated by our public health authorities.”
Bossche is sounding the alarm over a looming collapse of immunity among those who received the Covid mRNA injections.
According to Bossche, the long-term results of the “vaccines” will be a widespread global wave of turbo cancer, heart attacks, strokes, and ultimately death.
He warns that countries with the highest vaccination rates will be most impacted by the looming “wave” of death and disease.
Bossche warned that the world is heading for a serious reckoning in a new essay.
He argues that the global Covid vaccination strategy set global populations up for more serious illness in the future, triggering a mass extinction event.
However, he doesn’t call this a prophecy, noting that it’s simply biology.
At the beginning of his essay, Dr. Bossche acknowledges that his warning will mostly be “met with scorn” by the establishment.
“Many people think I’m an idiot or a conspiracy theorist,” he predicts.
“I understand that if you haven’t really dug into the complex dynamics of this immune escape pandemic, it’s almost impossible to see that my predictions are actually based on rational, scientific reasoning,” he adds.
“On the flip side, those with whom I feel aligned in terms of mindset and aware of the damage caused by this large-scale interference in population immunity often call me a ‘visionary.’
“They seem amazed by how easily they think I can ‘see the future.’
“That label, though, because calling it ‘visionary’ kind of downplays all the years of scientific insights, careful reasoning, and hard-earned knowledge behind it.”
The theory behind Bossche’s warning is that people who received Covid mRNA injections have suffered long-term damage to their immune system.
While those people may seem fine for now, they will be vulnerable to waves of disease that will emerge in the next few years.
“Disturbances in natural balance” may not immediately “transition into full-blown chaos or system breakdown,” he explains.
Bossche expects this wave of deadly disease to begin five to six years after the mass “vaccination” campaign began in early 2021.
“Without mechanisms for adaptation or resilience, there’s a very real risk that systems collapse — suddenly and irreversibly,” he writes.
“Where it is currently most obvious—at least to me—that we are running out of the ability to adapt or remain resilient is in the ongoing immune escape pandemic: after 5–6 years of increasingly disruptive influences — mainly irrational infection-control measures followed by poorly thought-out mass vaccination — the population’s immunity has largely lost its ability to effectively adapt to continued viral immune escape.”
“In this high-entropy phase of modern civilization, further viral evolution in highly C-19 vaccinated populations is the most likely factor to trigger societal collapse,” he adds.
“This non-linear collapse would likely prevent the breakdown of other already-strained systems.
“This might be the only positive element in an otherwise bleak scenario.”
He also notes that deaths, chronic illness, and injuries have already surged among vaccinated populations.
However, he suggests the excess death rates already seen are only the tip of the iceberg of what is to come.
“Beyond the well-documented direct side effects of the mRNA-based ‘vaccine’ injections, highly vaccinated C-19 populations are now increasingly witnessing excess mortality due to vaccine-associated immune dysregulation,” he notes.
Governments, pharmaceutical companies, and health officials “have orchestrated a large-scale gain-of-function experiment on the human species, leading to convergent evolution of dramatic immune dysregulation and catastrophic viral immune escape,” the top scientist adds.
He concludes by warning that “there is little immune buffer capacity left to delay a spectacular wave of hyperacute systemic disease in highly C-19 vaccinated populations.”
He also adds that the threat to the mRNA-vaccinated masses “may be relatively harmless to the unvaccinated population.”
Dr. Bossche has been speaking out to warn the public about the injections for some time now, as Slay News previously reported.
The top scientist issued a similar warning during an interview with vaccine expert and investigator Steve Kirsch.
Similarly, he warned the public that a “wave” of “unprecedented deaths” is looming for those who received Covid mRNA injections.
Bossche declared that a coming “wave of morbidity” and “mortality” will wipe out the Covid-vaccinated.
The Bill Gates insider warned that population numbers worldwide will soon experience a “completely unprecedented” plunge.
Bossche predicts that “up to 30-40%” of the general public will soon die “in highly vaccinated countries.”
He also notes that Covid is impossible to tackle with mRNA injections because it will always continue to mutate.
“The mutations are no longer restricted to spike protein, which indicates enhanced activity of CTLs (cytotoxic T cells) to diminish viral infectiousness,” Bossche explained to Kirsch.
“And that CTL activity is responsible for the decline of T cells that in fact boost the neutralizing antibodies that prevent virulence.”
For this same reason, Bossche has previously warned that it was a mistake to roll out a vaccine for public use in the middle of a pandemic.
The vaccinologist notes that vaccinating large portions of the public will only make viruses stronger, rather than defeating them.
Bossche explained that waves of serious illness are increasing in developed, highly vaccinated countries.
“Ultimately, this evolution would inevitably lead to the emergence of a highly virulent variant that would cause waves of hospitalizations and severe disease in highly vaccinated countries – of course, always the same, only in highly vaccinated countries,” Bossche stressed.
The expert then warned that these highly vaccinated countries will soon see “unprecedented” numbers of deaths.
“In my humble opinion, what we will see is something completely, completely unprecedented in terms of the magnitude of the wave of morbidity and unfortunately mortality that we will see,” he said.
Kirsch asked Bossche for specifics about what this “completely unprecedented” future phenomenon would entail.
He responded by predicting that over one-third of all people will die as a direct result of the Covid mRNA injection rollout.
“In some of the highly vaccinated populations … I would not be surprised that we will be dealing with serious decimation of the population, in some populations, maybe up to 30 or 40 percent,” Bossche commented.
WATCH: Click on the link below the image to view video…
In addition, Bossche previously warned the public during a separate interview that a “massive tsunami” of “chaos” and “death” is about to decimate the global Covid mRNA-vaccinated population.
As Slay News reported, Bossche warned that a “huge, huge wave” of illness and deaths among those vaccinated for Covid is now “imminent.”
The top scientist says this “massive tsunami” will collapse hospitals and cause financial, economic, and social “chaos.”
“What I am predicting is a massive, massive tsunami” of illness and death among highly vaccinated populations with compromised immune systems, Bossche said.
“You will see what will happen, for example, in the next coming weeks…is more and more cases of more serious long Covid…
“They will start to replace the surge of the cancers…now we have a more chronic phase.
“It will end with a hyper-acute phase, a huge, huge wave…
“I’ve been studying this now for four years.
“I know what I’m talking about,” Bossche asserted.
“The thing I want your audience to understand, what we will be facing in the hyper-acute Covid crisis that is imminent, is that we will have to build a completely new world…” Bossche continues.
“It is very very clear that when this starts, our hospitals will collapse.
“And that means the chaos in all kinds of layers of society — financial, economic, social, you name it — will be complete.”
“This will be something that will be reported in history for many, many generations to come,” he noted.
Blogger Comment: Euthanasia is what the Government of the United Kingdom is presently signing up to and where it has only taken Canada 9-years from 2016 to get to this relatively ‘short’ period in time where tens of thousands a year are being euthanized from zero in 2016, but what do you expect when their Political Leaders (Carney and Trudeau before him) are The World Economic Forum (The WEF) in Davos senior members and where Carney was a Founding member of the WEF Foundation and only good at counting your money as a central bank governor and obeying the WEF’s commands in every detail…, and where WEF if you did not know, have been promoting Euthanasia for decades with Bill Gates, another senior WEF member and like his father before him, who was a major player in the USA’s Euthanasia proponents group and son like father really, but seriously worse…and respectfully the world will learn eventually and what is really happening around the world against humanity…where the WEF have stated that they want to reduce humanity down to a mere 500 million from 8.2 billion now…
According to Health Canada‘s recent report on government-assisted suicide, euthanasia made up 4.1 percent of deaths nationwide last year.
The figure is a significant increase from 3.3 percent in 2021.
The 2022 report on Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) was released last October.
It revealed that euthanasia has claimed the lives of an estimated 45,000 Canadians since it was first legalized in 2016.
Some 1,018 Canadians were killed by government-assisted suicide in 2016.
By 2022, that figure had skyrocketed to an alarming 13,241.
This means an average of 36 people were euthanized per day in Canada last year.
It also means that there has been an average yearly growth rate of 31.1 percent since 2019.
According to data, at least 81 percent of written requests for MAID were granted.
However, of the remaining 19 percent, only 3.5 percent of applicants were considered ineligible for MAID, a number which has been declining since 2019.
Many people denied government-assisted suicide were refused because of a lack of patient capacity.
Alarmingly, they would have otherwise been euthanized if there were enough beds available.
According to the Association for Reformed Political Action Canada (ARPA Canada), Quebec and British Columbia have the highest rates of euthanasia, constituting 6.6 percent and 5.5 percent of all deaths in those provinces, respectively.
Meanwhile, Newfoundland and Labrador and Manitoba have the lowest rates, with euthanasia accounting for only 1.5 percent and 2.1 percent of all deaths, respectively.
According to Health Canada, in order to be eligible for MAID, a person must experience “intolerable physical or psychological suffering that is caused by their medical condition or their state of decline and that cannot be relieved under conditions that the individual finds acceptable.”
A survey of MAID recipients has shown that the main source of their “intolerable suffering” is the “loss of [their] ability to engage in meaningful life activities.”
86 percent of the respondents are experiencing this.
At least 82 percent reported that they have lost the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL).
Additionally, those surveyed were able to select more than one option, making the total exceed 100 percent.
Life advocate Amanda Achtman said that this confirms that “euthanasia is mainly [an] existential issue, not a pain-management or medical one.”
By March 17, 2024, people with mental illness as their sole underlying medical condition will be eligible for MAID.
However, some health experts argue that mental illness alone should not be a criterion for assisted death.
Sonu Gaind, the chief psychiatrist at Toronto’s Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, explained that it can sometimes be difficult to determine whether a mental illness is truly irremediable, as the law requires, and to differentiate between pathological suicidality and a rational desire to die.
Gaind added that even health experts don’t fully understand the biology of most mental illnesses.
Meanwhile, activists have warned that Canada’s expansion of assisted death puts individuals with intellectual and physical disabilities, low incomes, or other vulnerabilities at risk.
In an interview, Michelle Hewitt, co-chair of the advocacy group Disability Without Poverty, cited as an example the widely reported case of Sean Tagert.
He opted for medically assisted death in 2019 after he struggled to get 24-hour care.
Tagert was very clear on what he wanted, which was more care hours at home.
When he was told that he would have to move to a care facility away from his family, especially his young son, he opted for euthanasia.
According to heartbreaking social media posts by his family, finding care was “a constant struggle and source of stress” for Tagert.
As of 2022 and early 2023, reports reveal that military veterans have also been offered government-assisted suicide by Veterans Affairs officials.
In one case, a Canadian Forces veteran seeking treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury was shocked when he was offered MAID by a Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC) employee.
Several sources confirmed that the combat veteran never raised the issue nor asked about MAID and was “deeply disturbed by the suggestion.”
While there have been follow-up calls from the agency, who wanted to apologize to the veteran, sources say the calls only took place after the veteran filed several complaints with the VAC.
In a statement, the VAC acknowledged that its employee discussed MAID with the veteran inappropriately.
The agency is currently investigating the incident and will conduct “appropriate administrative action.”
However, the VAC declined to discuss the nature of the ongoing investigation or the specifics of what consequences the employee might face due to privacy concerns.
The department has also declined to answer questions about how many times assisted dying has been offered to veterans through its employees, or what guidance these employees have been given about providing such shocking “advice.”
World Freedom 