Blogger Comment:This is all part of the Globalist Davos plan to try and con us into believing this is right, but where the WEF’s real plan in reality is to divide us and to make racial tensions move the world away from compassion and the wellbeing of mutually peaceful societies to ones that are against peace and understanding…one of the Globalist’s mindsets of control…
A new advertisement from Denmark’s state broadcaster is drawing attention for its messaging about genetics and diversity, reigniting discussion about political themes in Western advertising.
The commercial, which promotes a science program titled “Evolution,” features an on-screen “expert” interrupting a white Danish couple as they flirt.
The expert explains that Denmark’s history of war introduced foreign DNA into the national gene pool, which he says “protected them from disease.”
He then compares their relationship to inbreeding because they are both white and suggests they seek partners with more “exotic” genetics.
The woman then smiles as if intrigued by the idea.
The series first aired in 2020 but is now being re-released with the same “inbreeding” advertisements in 2025.
The tone of the new campaign stands in sharp contrast to the nation’s 2014 “Do It For Denmark” ads.
The ad campaign encouraged Danish couples to have more children to address the country’s declining birth rate.
Observers have noted that the ad follows a broader trend of political or social themes in Western marketing, with campaigns often promoting messages around “diversity” and “inclusion.”
Data from the UK’s Channel 4 “Mirror” study found that while the UK population is approximately 83% white, black citizens, who make up about 4% of the population, appear in more than half of national television commercials.
Commentators have argued that this reflects a push for greater representation, though critics say it may not reflect demographic realities.
Advertising in both Europe and the United States has increasingly featured interracial couples, who make up roughly 10% of all marriages, according to U.S. and European data.
Social Media and Political Reactions
Public responses to these trends have varied.
Some argue that increased diversity in advertising reflects social progress, while others see it as an overcorrection or a politically motivated effort.
In the United States, controversy erupted earlier this year when American Eagle aired a jeans commercial featuring actress Sydney Sweeney, in which she discussed her “good genes.”
Some online commentators accused the brand and Sweeney of promoting “Nazi propaganda,” calling the language offensive.
The incident drew widespread attention to how advertising narratives, once focused primarily on consumer products, have become touchpoints in broader cultural and political debates.
Advertising as Social Messaging
Industry analysts note that advertising has long mirrored cultural priorities and public discourse.
While it remains a vehicle for selling goods and services, it increasingly serves as a platform for social commentary, reflecting evolving norms, values, and political perspectives.
The Danish advertisement and its reception illustrate how marketing campaigns can provoke debate over national identity, representation, and the
The Canadian government’s plan to soon begin euthanizing citizens suffering from mental illness is facing a growing uprising from the public, conservative lawmakers, and concerned doctors.
The major backlash is swelling amid growing outrage over how vulnerable citizens, including veterans, are being railroaded into cheap “assisted suicide” instead of more expensive care.
A Conservative MP’s bill to stop Canada’s next planned expansion of assisted suicide is now rapidly gaining momentum, with support from the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition (EPC).
During a press conference in Ottawa, the EPC warned that Canada’s euthanasia program, officially called “Medical Assistance in Dying” (MAiD), has already gone far beyond its original intent.
Campaigners are arguing that it must not be expanded to people suffering from mental illness.
“Our takeaway message is this,” said Gordon Friesen, EPC president.
“No euthanasia for mental illness.”
Friesen said MAiD was initially intended for terminally ill people who “were dying” after exhausting all treatment options and could “freely choose.”
But he argued those safeguards have been eroded.
“Unfortunately, all of those promises have been broken,” Friesen said.
“What fuels support for MAiD is not that people believe that some patients should die, but because they can make free, informed, competent, and adult choices,” he added.
“Euthanasia for the mentally ill does not fit that description.
“For the symptoms of mental illness often make that sort of choice impossible.”
Veteran Exposes “Coercion” in Canada’s Euthanasia System
Among the speakers was Canadian Forces combat veteran Kelsi Sheren.
Sheren said she was pressured into “choosing” euthanasia as an “option” instead of treatment.
“I understood that I might die for my country, but what I didn’t understand was that … one day, my own government would quietly offer to help me do it,” Sheren said.
“When somebody is drowning in trauma and desperation, that’s not a choice, that’s coercion, wearing a polite face,” she continued.
“I’ve spoken with veterans who have reached out for help and asked for therapy, for hope, for treatment, and what they got instead was an offer to end their lives.”
Sheren’s testimony echoes a series of recent reports in which disabled Canadians and veterans say they were encouraged to consider MAiD instead of receiving mental health care or housing assistance.
Conservative Bill Seeks to End Expansion Plans
The legislation at the center of the debate, Bill C-218, was introduced by Conservative MP Tamara Jansen.
It has passed its first reading in Parliament and is now at the second reading stage.
The bill, formally titled An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying), would explicitly prevent the government from expanding euthanasia eligibility to those suffering solely from mental illness.
“Allowing ‘medical assistance in dying’ for those with mental illness is not healthcare, that’s not compassion, it’s abandonment,” Jansen said.
“Mental illness is treatable.
“Recovery is possible, but only if we show up and help.”
The bill states plainly:
“This enactment amends the Criminal Code to provide that a mental disorder is not a grievous and irremediable medical condition for which a person could receive medical assistance in dying.”
Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre praised Jansen’s leadership on the issue, saying she is working “to protect these people and get them proper health care and treatment, not assisted suicide.”
Canada’s Expanding Euthanasia Regime
Since 2016, when euthanasia was first legalized under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, roughly 90,000 Canadians have died under the MAiD program, according to a new report from the EPC.
Originally restricted to the terminally ill, the program was expanded in 2021 through Bill C-7 to include people with chronic conditions.
The ruling Liberal Party government has since sought to extend it again, this time to people whose sole underlying condition is mental illness.
Following backlash from pro-life advocates, medical professionals, and provincial governments, the government delayed the mental illness expansion until 2027.
The government was forced to postpone the plan following a pushback from doctors who refused to euthanize patients for mental illness.
But the EPC warns that delay is not enough.
Proponents of Bill C-218 argue that making euthanasia available to those with mental illness would cross an ethical red line.
It has been transforming Canada’s health system from one meant to save lives into one that facilitates death for people in crisis.
Conveniently, Canada’s socialized healthcare system is saving tens of millions of dollars a year by euthanizing patients instead of treating them.
“No Euthanasia for Mental Illness”
Friesen said the message from Canadians is simple: Stop before it goes any further.
“No euthanasia for mental illness,” he reiterated.
“We must protect the vulnerable, not enable despair.”
Sheren’s story and the EPC’s campaign have amplified growing public concern that Canada’s euthanasia regime has spiraled out of control.
It comes as bureaucrats and health officials are now increasingly treating death as a solution to suffering.
Blogger Comment:This is what is now happening all over the western world and has become an epidemic in its nature as though their is a central instrument directing all this new way of dying early and its not even with the teerminal ill anymore, but predominantly people in good health and mind…what is happening to us as the only intelligent species known to exist in science that can think for itself and take alternative pathways in life and make informed decisions…as this goes totally against the modus operadi of human life…for unfortunately the old and frail are easy led by people they have learnt to believe in and trust…like the medical profession and politicians that is driving this phenomena it appears based upon raw evidence…
A Canadian man is sounding the alarm after both of his grandmothers were killed by government-sanctioned euthanasia within weeks in a double tragedy, he says has left deep wounds that will never fully heal.
“We’re here because two of my four grandparents died through euthanasia within two months of each other,” said Benjamin Turland, opening a powerful new video.
Turland told his story in the new short film released through Dying to Meet You, a storytelling project run by Amanda Achtman.
Achtman’s work has spotlighted Canadians who have been pressured into “choosing” euthanasia instead of receiving more expensive care.
Those featured include Roger Foley, who was repeatedly offered MAiD while seeking help, and Christine, an elderly woman who tattooed “Don’t Euthanize Me” on her arm out of fear of the system.
Turland’s testimony adds another devastating layer.
He described the moment his parents told him that his first grandmother had been euthanized under the government’s MAiD program:
“I’ve never had that experience before where I felt like someone punched me in the gut,” he said.
“She was most likely going to die within a few days by natural causes… it just wrecked me.”
Two months later, the grandmother he was closest to was also euthanized by the government.
She wasn’t just a family member; she was his confidant, his friend, even his roommate while he attended university.
They called each other “Bestie.”
Losing her by lethal injection left him questioning everything.
“There’s a strong guilt of like, why didn’t I say something?” he told Achtman.
“The message [her choice of euthanasia] sends to me is, I’m like, did I not love you enough?
“Did I not love you the correct way?
“Did I not make you feel like you are not a burden?”
The questions haunt him.
“If I could have had two more days with you, would I take that?” he said.
“Yes. Over anything.
“Because now I don’t have you…
“Even if you can’t talk… even if I just get to hold your hand.”
For Turland, it wasn’t just the deaths; it was the method.
“It’s the choice of MAiD that hurts,” he said.
“With my grandfathers, I couldn’t have done anything about them passing…
“But when you choose it, I feel like there is something I could have done, and it impacts multiple generations.”
He pleaded with Canadians to talk openly with their elderly loved ones now, before they reach a vulnerable moment and feel pressured toward ending their lives.
According to Turland, these conversations may be difficult, but nothing compares to the pain of losing a grandparent through MAiD.
While supporters of euthanasia frame the procedure as compassionate relief, Turland says the reality is far more complicated: families are left confused, grieving, and wondering if they could have done more.
Activists, he noted, often tell them they aren’t “entitled” to their grief.
He rejects that entirely.
Life, he says, should be anchored in love and presence.
“You’re saying to them: I just want to be with you, for every moment, till every last breath,” he told Achtman.
“I don’t know why that would be a bad thing for them to hear, because they are going to feel so loved.”
Blogger COMmEnT: This I believe is another build-up story for the Globalist, who have been warning in their madness in taking control of humanity by 2030 through their OWG agenda that an alien invasion of Earth is coming and to constantly put these thoughts in the subconscious mind of the people through fear and a feeling of surrender to save themselves and humanity where the people believe this fake Globalists agenda…as fear is the prime weapon of the Davos elite who now control NASA and all points South to the hidden constructs within Antarctica, where mystery after mystery surrounds more mysteries, as any CIA controlled entity will tell you…
Astronomers are sounding the alarm after reporting unusual behavior from the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS as it nears the Sun.
The leading scientists tracking the 3I/ATLAS have reported two significant new developments after moving behind the Sun, out of view from Earth.
Behind the Sun, the comet appears to show signs of acceleration beyond what is expected by gravity.
And for reasons not yet clear, it appears to have changed color for a second time as the object approached perihelion.
The second unexplained color change and signs of non-gravitational acceleration are sending shockwaves through the astronomy and astrophysics communities.
The findings have just been revealed in a study published on the pre-print server arXiv.
3I/ATLAS, first identified on July 1 by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS), is only the third confirmed interstellar visitor to pass through our Solar System, following 1I/ʻOumuamua and 2I/Borisov.
Its unusual trajectory, with an eccentricity above 6, confirmed its extrasolar origin.
Since its discovery, astronomers have debated the object’s composition and behavior, noting characteristics that suggest it may be an exceptionally old remnant from a much earlier era of the universe.
Researchers have also struggled to determine which region of the Milky Way it originated from.
As the object approached perihelion on October 29, it moved into a position directly behind the Sun from Earth’s perspective.
The maneuver has limited observational opportunities during a key phase of its journey.
In the new study, scientists used imagery from Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory (STEREO), SOlar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO), and the GOES-19 weather satellite to monitor the object despite the line-of-sight challenges.
Their findings indicate that 3I/ATLAS brightened far more rapidly than typical Oort-cloud comets and underwent a marked shift in color.
The team reports the object brightened to approximately magnitude 9, making it visible through small telescopes.
They note that “color photometry shows the comet to be distinctly bluer than the Sun.”
This is the second known color change, and researchers say they currently lack a definitive explanation for the behavior.
The brightening rate is described as “far in excess” of what is normally observed in comets originating from the outer reaches of the Solar System.
Evidence of Non-Gravitational Acceleration
In separate observations, Davide Farnocchia of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory reported signs of non-gravitational acceleration, meaning the object’s motion cannot be explained by gravity alone.
Harvard University theoretical physicist Avi Loeb summarized the findings, writing that the acceleration was detected at a distance of 1.36 AU from the Sun, roughly 203 million kilometers.
He notes a “radial acceleration away from the Sun of 135 kilometers (=9×10^{-7}au) per day squared” and a “transverse acceleration relative to the Sun’s direction of 60 kilometers (=4×10^{-7}au) per day squared.”
Scientists caution that non-gravitational acceleration does not prove the object is maneuvering; many comets experience additional acceleration due to outgassing, the release of gas and dust as surface ices are heated by the Sun.
Loeb writes that, assuming typical thermal ejection speeds, “the evaporation half-life of 3I/ATLAS is 6 months,” adding that the object could lose around ten percent of its mass over the month surrounding perihelion.
If so, researchers expect a detectable plume of gas during November and December 2025.
The European Space Agency’s JUICE spacecraft may be able to help confirm whether this mass loss is occurring.
Brightening Continues, but Causes Remain Unclear
In their pre-print analysis, the observing team reports that “the comet will likely emerge from conjunction considerably brighter than when it entered,” projecting a geocentric V magnitude of ~9 at perihelion.
They note this may be “driven by prominent, visible gas emission.”
However, they emphasize that major questions remain:
“The reason for 3I’s rapid brightening… remains unclear.”
They note that earlier cooling effects from CO₂ sublimation could have suppressed water-ice sublimation at greater distances, contributing to the unusual brightness surge as the object approached the Sun.
They also note that 3I/ATLAS is moving toward the Sun more rapidly than most comets, which may be influencing its activity.
What Comes Next
Researchers stress that 3I/ATLAS’s post-perihelion behavior is unpredictable.
“Without an established physical explanation, the outlook for 3I’s postperihelion behavior remains uncertain,” they conclude.
They add that the object could plateau, continue brightening briefly, or begin to fade as it moves away from the Sun.
Continued observations in the coming weeks may help resolve the questions surrounding this rare interstellar visitor.
Blogger Comment:The corruption in the former Biden government and their control over the FBI and the Justice Department is an unprecedented chapter in US history and where political syndicate crimes against Americans were non-stop, which showed clearly the blatent and operational modus operanti of crimes against the people of the United States that was in constant action totally against law and order showing clearly how utterly corrupt the ‘DEMOCRAT’ Biden Administration really was with no comparable US Administration ever, as they thrived on crime to contually distort the minds of the American people through lies after lies after lies…period
Jeffrey Epstein allegedly told his former cellmate that federal prosecutors in New York offered to let him walk free if he falsely implicated President Donald Trump in his crimes.
The allegations were revealed in a newly surfaced pardon application.
Epstein, arrested in July 2019 on sex-trafficking and conspiracy charges, briefly shared a cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center with former police officer Nicholas Tartaglione.
At the time, Tartaglione was awaiting trial on a quadruple-murder case.
Tartaglione, 57, now claims Epstein confided that prosecutors pressed him to tie Trump to his crimes.
The allegation is detailed in a July pardon application obtained by The New York Post.
“Prosecutors … told Epstein that if he said President Trump was involved with Esptein’s crimes, he would walk free. in a petition to be pardoned,” Tartaglione wrote.
He also alleges Epstein said that then–lead prosecutor Maurene Comey, the daughter of disgraced former FBI Director James Comey, told him “he didn’t have to prove anything, as long as President Trump’s people could not disprove it.”
The filing further claims Comey said the FBI was “her people, not his [President Trump’s].”
Tartaglione says Epstein insisted:
“President Trump was not involved in Epstein’s crimes.”
The documents do not specify what allegations prosecutors wanted Epstein to make.
Epstein, who had ties across political and corporate circles, faced charges that carried a potential decades-long sentence at the time of his death.
Maurene Comey, who led the prosecution in Tartaglione’s murder case, was fired by the Department of Justice in July.
She has not yet commented on the allegations.
Epstein’s Final Weeks in MCC
Tartaglione and Epstein shared a cell until July 23, 2019, the night the late pedophile was found with bruising on his neck in what officials called a suicide attempt.
Epstein was then moved to suicide watch and later assigned a different cellmate.
On August 10, Epstein was found dead in his cell.
His death was officially ruled a suicide, though persistent security lapses, missing video footage, and conflicting accounts from staff have fueled ongoing public scrutiny.
Tartaglione: Prosecution Manipulated Evidence
Tartaglione, a former Westchester K9 officer, was later convicted of murdering four men after suspecting an employee had stolen drug money. He is now serving a life sentence.
In his pardon request, Tartaglione claims he was framed. He alleges:
A seized mobile phone was tampered with to add his name as a contact
Video evidence was “altered, spliced, mutilated, and destroyed”
A cooperating witness, Joseph Biggs, fabricated details after meeting prosecutors 30 times
Biggs later received a 17-year sentence rather than life after admitting to pulling the trigger in one of the killings and cooperating with the government.
At sentencing, the judge criticized Tartaglione’s conduct, saying he cared more about animals than the people he killed, calling him delusional and citing “overwhelming evidence.”
Safety Concerns After Epstein’s Death
Tartaglione says he has survived multiple attempts on his life inside federal custody since Epstein’s death.
He says the attacks include assaults that left him with a metal plate in his head.
Blooger Comment:The Globalists are going to close down what we are told by our Press and News Platforms and we shall hear what they want us to know, never the truth but pure propaganda and where this article is an example of the what WEF controlled people are doing to ‘truth news’ through the WEF Globalist’s cover-up and Close Down Agenda in the western world and we have to thank God that there is a Trump in at least one non-captured nation now, the USA and where there are only 4 western nations that are now WEF free… Every free citizen of the world should read this article to open up their eyes and minds to what is really going on…as its all about controlling ..YOU and Your Loved Ones…
Stanford University is under congressional investigation over allegations that its Cyber Policy Center has been working with foreign governments and NGOs to censor Americans’ speech.
The censorship effort was revealed in a report from investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) is leading the probe, seeking answers on whether the university coordinated with overseas officials to pressure U.S. platforms into removing content protected under the First Amendment.
In an October 22 letter, Jordan demanded documents from Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center relating to what he described as a “foreign censorship scheme” and a roundtable held last month that “brought together foreign officials who have directly targeted American speech.”
Secret Meeting with Foreign Censorship Officials
According to Jordan, the event’s keynote speaker was Julie Inman-Grant, “the Australian eSafety Commissioner who has explicitly argued that governments have the authority to demand and enforce global takedowns of content.”
The roundtable, which Stanford did not publicly announce, was “secret and only discovered thanks to a whistleblower who provided Jordan’s investigators with the agenda,” Shellenberger reported.
Attendees reportedly included representatives from the European Union, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Brazil.
“By hosting this event, designed to encourage and facilitate censorship compliance with regulators from Australia, Brazil, the EU, and the UK, Stanford is working with foreign censorship officials to vitiate the First Amendment,” Jordan wrote in his letter.
History of Collusion Claims
Shellenberger noted that in 2023, Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center was “caught covering up and lying” about its collaboration with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) during the Biden administration to censor online speech.
Documents released in the Twitter Files revealed that the Stanford Internet Observatory, part of the same center, worked with DHS and Big Tech companies to suppress online posts questioning the government’s pandemic narrative.
Jordan’s letter said the new inquiry is part of a broader effort to determine “how and to what extent foreign laws, regulations, and judicial orders compel, coerce, or influence companies to censor speech in the United States.”
He gave Stanford director Jeff Hancock, Ph.D., until November 5 to comply.
“Weaponizing Foreign Laws” to Bypass U.S. Free Speech
California attorney Greg Glaser warned that the situation represents “a dangerous fusion of academia, government, and corporate power to circumvent constitutional protections.”
Stanford’s prior involvement in content moderation during the COVID-19 era, Glaser said, amounted to a bypass of the First Amendment, using private platforms to do what the government could not legally do itself.
Jordan agreed that a “new threat” is emerging: foreign laws requiring U.S. companies to remove content accessible to Americans.
“The Committee is concerned that Stanford, and specifically its Cyber Policy Center, may be one of the third parties engaged in assisting foreign governments attempting to suppress American speech,” Jordan wrote.
Global Push for Censorship
The European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) and the UK’s Online Safety Act have been cited as examples of international laws with far-reaching censorship implications.
In June, a House Judiciary Committee staff report found that the EU “weaponizes the DSA as a censorship tool that requires the world’s largest social media platforms to engage in censorship of core political discourse.”
Data from X’s 2024 DSA Transparency Report showed that Germany accounted for nearly 90% of all EU requests to identify or censor users accused of posting “illegal or harmful speech.”
The UK, which enacted its own Online Safety Act in October 2023, reportedly made over 12,000 arrests for online speech that year.
The number is higher than arrests in Germany, China, Turkey, and Belarus combined, according to The Times of London.
Australia’s Online Safety Act, enforced by Inman-Grant’s eSafety Commission, carries similar provisions.
Inman-Grant told the World Economic Forum she aims to “coordinate, build capacity… use the tools that we have.”
She added that globalists must “work together with other like-minded independent statutory authorities around the globe.”
Inman-Grant is listed as one of the WEF’s “Agenda Contributors.”
Glaser said such coordination represents “an end-run around Americans’ fundamental rights”, using foreign partnerships to suppress protected speech.
“Stanford’s Internet Observatory Didn’t Die — It Went Global”
Jordan’s letter accused Stanford of once again “attempting to covertly undermine the First Amendment rights of Americans by collaborating with foreign government officials.”
Shellenberger reported that while the Stanford Internet Observatory was widely believed to be dismantled amid prior scrutiny, it was revived under new funding.
The roundtable in question was financed by Frank McCourt, a major donor to the Cyber Policy Center, through his Project Liberty Institute, which promotes “digital governance” and “democratic values.”
“Stanford’s Internet Observatory didn’t die, it went global,” said Seamus Bruner, author of Controligarchs and research director at the Government Accountability Institute.
“The same censorship cartel that policed Americans’ speech during Covid is now hiding behind foreign flags.
“They’re trying to do overseas what the Constitution forbids them to do at home. Congress should treat this as a national sovereignty issue, not just a speech issue,” Bruner said.
Targeting “True Stories”
The Virality Project, housed within the Stanford Internet Observatory, was a key player in monitoring social media content during the pandemic.
According to the Twitter Files, the project tracked and flagged “true stories” as “disinformation.”
Those flagged included posts by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Kennedy was described as producing “a large volume of content that is almost always reportable.”
The documents showed the project worked “in partnership with the CDC” and promoted pro-vaccine narratives, influencing Twitter’s content moderation policies.
In 2022, the Virality Project proposed a “rumor-control mechanism” to manage trending narratives, an idea later mirrored by the FDA’s “Rumor Control” initiative launched the same year.
Taxpayer-Funded “Censorship-Industrial Complex”
Shellenberger told Congress last year that “taxpayers are unwittingly financing the growth and power of a censorship-industrial complex run by America’s scientific and technological elite, which endangers our liberties and democracy.”
The revelations have played a key role in the ongoing Missouri v. Biden lawsuit, which accuses federal agencies of working with private companies to silence protected speech online.
The case remains active in federal court after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to uphold prior injunctions against the defendants earlier this year.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced a nationwide crackdown on unapproved and potentially risky prescription fluoride products being sold for children, warning that many have been in circulation for decades without proper review or authorization.
In a notice issued to manufacturers, the agency told companies selling ingestible fluoride drugs that it plans to remove unapproved products from the market.
“We are providing this notice to allow your company time to assess your products and take appropriate corrective actions,” regulators wrote.
Decades of Unapproved Use
According to a new FDA analysis, ingestible fluoride products, such as pills and drops prescribed to prevent cavities, have been used in the U.S. since the 1940s but were never formally approved.
While the analysis found the products may help reduce tooth decay in permanent teeth, it also determined there is no proven benefit for younger children.
The agency also highlighted several health risks, including tooth discoloration and potential harm to the gut microbiome.
“Overall, out of an abundance of caution, it would be prudent to limit use of ingestible fluoride drug products to children aged three years and older who are at high risk of tooth decay,” the FDA stated.
That includes children with a history of cavities or limited access to fluoridated water, the agency said.
Trump Administration Targets “Outdated Science”
The move comes as part of President Donald Trump’s “Make America Healthy Again” initiative, which seeks to reevaluate long-standing public health practices.
“This Halloween, the FDA is driving a stake through the heart of outdated science and protecting our kids from the risks associated with ingestible fluoride,” said Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who oversees the FDA.
“It’s scary that these products have been used for decades without approval.
“Today’s action raises public awareness, informs medical professionals, and builds on President Trump’s commitment to Make Our Children Healthy Again.”
FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary said newer science shows the products can interfere with healthy gut bacteria.
“There are better ways to protect children’s teeth than taking unapproved ingestible fluoride, which is now recognized to alter the gut microbiome,” Makary said.
“The microbiome is increasingly recognized to be central to a child’s health and development.”
Products Under Scrutiny
The crackdown targets chewable tablets and drops made by Method Pharmaceuticals, Bryant Ranch Prepack, and Winder Laboratories.
Method manufactures drops marketed for children as young as six months old, while the tablets are sold for children ages three to sixteen.
None of the companies has publicly responded to the FDA’s notice.
Fluoride Debate Intensifies
The FDA first announced plans in May to phase out ingestible fluoride drugs, citing new evidence linking fluoride consumption to disruption of gut microbiota.
“Ending the use of ingestible fluoride is long overdue,” Kennedy said at the time.
Fluoride remains a common additive in water and toothpaste.
However, health officials under the Trump administration have questioned the long-standing assumption that systemic fluoride is universally beneficial.
Kennedy has also said that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will stop recommending the addition of fluoride to drinking water.
Although the agency has not yet updated its guidance.
Blogger Comment:People believe that the UK’s BBC is an honest and truthful World News Organization, but the truth is that they are organ of the WEF Globalists at their very base and do as the Davos elites tell them what they can report, or more importantly, what can they CANNOT report and why they are a controlled Global news institution that you should take their news coverage with a pinch of salt, as they cover-up and in the main spread disinformation to the masses, but sublimely, subtlely and psychologically in the world of corrupt mind control that the military and CIA use that is straight out of the pocketbook of the misinformation brainwashing of years gone by like what the Nazis did to their people through their centralised controlled news propaganda organization that worked, as there were concentrated into a single overriding national concern such as the modern day BBC today…for once the people had a single entity run by government, the people never heard the truth a the real truth on the other side of the coin…that’s where we are really heading with all this government censorship in all western nations, but four now…for the worst thing that an intelligent nation can ever have is a national propaganda news outlet that the UK clearly now has and its getting worse by the year as 2030 WEF year comes ever nearer…
The White House has slammed the BBC after an internal report revealed that the UK taxpayer-funded broadcaster had deceptively edited footage of President Donald Trump’s January 6, 2021, speech, falsely portraying him as calling for violence.
According to a 19-page dossier obtained by The Daily Telegraph, former BBC adviser Michael Prescott accused the network of “completely misleading” viewers during an episode of Panorama that aired one week before the 2024 election.
Prescott, who served three years as an independent adviser to the BBC before leaving last June, said his repeated warnings to the broadcaster’s standards watchdog were “dismissed or ignored.”
Report Alleges Edited Footage and Misleading Audio
The internal report alleges that Panorama spliced together two separate portions of Trump’s January 6 speech to make it appear as though he urged supporters to march to the U.S. Capitol and “fight like hell.”
In reality, the president said he would accompany supporters “to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”
The dossier further claims that the edited clip added crowd noise to make Trump’s supporters appear “more menacing.”
“The program made Trump ‘say’ things [he] ‘never actually said’ by editing together footage from the start of his speech with something he said nearly an hour later,” the document states.
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson condemned the BBC’s actions in a statement.
“Trust in the media is at an all-time low because of deceptive editing, misleading reporting, and outright lies,” Jackson said.
“This is yet another example, of many, highlighting why countless Americans turn to alternative media sources to get their news.”
BBC Faces Political Backlash
The allegations have sparked a political storm in the United Kingdom, where the BBC faces renewed scrutiny over its editorial standards and political neutrality ahead of funding negotiations tied to its Royal Charter renewal in 2027.
Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said the network’s conduct was “a total disgrace.”
“The BBC has doctored footage of Trump to make it look as though he incited a riot — when he in fact said no such thing,” Johnson said.
“We have Britain’s national broadcaster using a flagship program to tell palpable untruths about Britain’s closest ally.
“Is anyone at the BBC going to take responsibility — and resign?”
Nigel Farage, leader of the Reform Party, added:
“It’s no wonder that fewer people are paying the BBC license fee every single year.”
“Profound and Unresolved Concerns”
In his memo to BBC leadership, Prescott said he was motivated by “despair at inaction by the BBC executive when issues come to light.”
“I departed [from the advisory role] with profound and unresolved concerns about the BBC,” Prescott wrote.
“My view is that the executive repeatedly failed to implement measures to resolve highlighted problems, and in many cases simply refused to acknowledge there was an issue at all.”
He also criticized the reaction of BBC executives Jonathan Munro, senior controller of news content, and Deborah Turness, chief executive of BBC News.
“Firm and transparent action plans to prevent the re-occurrence of problems are in short supply – and so, as you can see, errors are repeated time and again,” Prescott wrote.
Reactions from Trump Allies
Donald Trump Jr. reacted to the controversy on X, writing:
“The FAKE NEWS ‘reporters’ in the UK are just as dishonest and full of s— as the ones here in America!!!!”
The BBC responded in a statement, saying:
“While we don’t comment on leaked documents, when the BBC receives feedback, it takes it seriously and considers it carefully.
“Michael Prescott is a former adviser to a board committee where differing views and opinions of our coverage are routinely discussed and debated.”
Blogger Comment:This is not at all surprising and in Carney (and WEF Trudeau before him), the Canadian people unawares voted in a key WEF Davos inner circle king-pin and where this article details what eventually happens to all western nations controlled by the Davos Globalists
Former WEF Man former Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau
WEF Top Inner Executive and Current Canadian Prime Minister Charney
Where now only a mere 4-western nations are not controlled by the literally ‘insane’ WEF Globalists, The USA, Hungary, Slovakia and Italy…do your own research if you do not believe this statement) and where they eventually, as they were preordained in Davos, will end up on the scrap heap of history and as it will do, if the people in the West do not start fighting back before their ringed year of 2030 is here where they have proclaimed that they will have destroyed all western nations as they are today and have taken control of humanity under their “One World Government” (OWG)… and when the major culling of humanity will really start, from slightly less than 8 billion now through the Globalist’s (Gates, Soros et al) Covid jabs to less than 400 million humans eventually…they have stated this and it is really coming if they are not stopped now…
Canadians were hit with another gut punch this week after Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem admitted the country’s economy is deteriorating and warned citizens to prepare for a “lower standard of living.”
During a Wednesday update in which Macklem also slashed Canada’s interest rate to 2.25 percent, the central bank chief effectively told working families that the days of prosperity are over.
“What’s most concerning is, unless we change some other things, our standard of living as a country, as Canadians, is going to be lower than it otherwise would have been,” Macklem told reporters.
“Unless something changes, our incomes will be lower than they otherwise would be.”
The bleak admission marks one of the clearest warnings yet that years of reckless government spending, high taxation, and runaway inflation under Liberal leadership have pushed the Canadian economy to the brink.
“Not Just a Cyclical Downturn”
Macklem tried to soften the blow but conceded that what Canada is facing “is not just a cyclical downturn.”
Pressed by reporters to explain what that meant, he pointed the finger at U.S. protectionist policies, including tariffs designed to protect American manufacturing.
However, analysts say Canada’s internal policies are the real culprit.
“Part of it is structural,” Macklem said, adding:
“The U.S. has swerved towards protectionism.”
“It is harder to do business with the United States.
“That has destroyed some of the capacity in this country. It’s also adding costs.”
He stopped short of uttering the word “recession” but acknowledged that growth is now “pretty close to zero.”
Liberal Overspending and Inflation Spiral
While Macklem blamed U.S. trade barriers, the economic reality is that Canada’s financial crisis has been years in the making.
It was fueled by Liberal Party overspending and money printing since 2015, first under Justin Trudeau and now under Prime Minister Mark Carney.
Inflation continues to rage at decades-high levels, eating away at wages and savings, while taxpayers are being crushed by some of the highest tax burdens in the world.
Canadian families now spend, on average, 42 percent of their income on taxes, which is more than they spend on food and shelter combined.
Meanwhile, the government continues to funnel taxpayer money overseas and into ideological pet projects, even admitting that funding Ukraine comes directly at “taxpayers’ expense.”
Millions More for “Gender” and “Pride” Spending
Carney has doubled down on his progressive agenda.
Earlier this week, he announced that his upcoming 2025 budget will include millions more for “SLGBTQI+ communities,” “gender equality,” and “pride safety” initiatives.
The radical plans are all funded by Canadian taxpayers, many of whom are struggling to pay their grocery bills.
The Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) blasted the Carney government for wasting $13 million since 2022 on frivolous promotional items such as “climate change card games,” “laser pens and flying saucers,” and “bamboo toothbrushes.”
“Lower Living Standards”
For many, Macklem’s words confirm what everyday Canadians already feel as the standard of living is collapsing, and the political class doesn’t seem to care.
As inflation soars, taxes rise, and real wages fall, the Bank of Canada’s message is clear: citizens should simply “accept less” while Ottawa continues to spend more.
With growth at zero and the cost of living skyrocketing, it’s little wonder so many Canadians are asking whether this economic decline was inevitable or engineered.
Acclaimed artist and sculptor Jackie Ferrara has been euthanized despite reportedly being in “good health.”
Ferrara is the latest celebrity to be killed by “assisted suicide,” continuing the disturbing trend of liberal media outlets glamorizing what should be treated as a tragedy, not a fashionable lifestyle choice.
Ferrara was killed via lethal injection on October 22 at age 95.
By all accounts, Ferrara was in “good health.”
She simply decided that she was “ready to go,” and didn’t want to “depend on anybody.”
“I don’t want a housekeeper,” she told The New York Times shortly before her death.
“I never wanted anybody.
“I was married three times.
“That’s enough,” she added.
Because Ferrara was healthy, she did not qualify for “assisted suicide” anywhere in the United States.
Instead, she traveled to Pegasos in Basel, Switzerland, a well-known suicide clinic, where she was euthanized by lethal injection.
Ferrara’s work is featured in the Museum of Modern Art, and her death was quickly praised by liberal media outlets.
People magazine confirmed her death through her estate and legacy advisor, Tina Hejtmanek.
But the tone of the coverage raised alarms.
The publication even used the Canadian acronym “MAiD” (Medical Assistance in Dying), a euphemism designed to sanitize the word “suicide.”
“Assisted suicide” sounds dramatic, while “MAiD” does not.
The use of gentle language isn’t accidental.
It’s part of a growing cultural campaign to mainstream euthanasia, particularly through the deaths of beloved public figures.
Just weeks before Ferrara’s death, on September 23, Holocaust survivor Ruth Posner and her husband were both euthanized at the same Swiss clinic.
Posner, who survived Treblinka and went on to become an actress, dancer, and memoirist, was widely celebrated by the press for her decision, not mourned for her death.
The coverage of such deaths seems like a deliberate attempt to mainstream and glamorize death by lethal injection.
And in Canada, children’s author Robert Munsch, famous for The Paper Bag Princess and Love You Forever, told The New York Times that he had been approved for euthanasia.
He will be killed by the Canadian government due to “mental decline.”
Munsch stated that he wants to die before dementia makes him “a lump” his wife must “be stuck with.”
He is currently in good health, however.
A Chilling Double Standard
The same media that mourned the suicide of Anthony Bourdain in 2018, calling it a “tragedy,” now treats euthanasia as “empowering” or “dignified.”
However, if Ferrara, Munsch, and Posner were found hanging from a rope, their deaths would be recognized as tragedies.
But once doctors or bureaucrats are involved, the moral compass shifts.
When the government begins euthanizing people with lethal injections, their deaths are suddenly praised as a form of “healthcare” rather than suicide.
A Dangerous Glamorization of Death
While suicide was once treated as a shocking moral failure, it is now marketed as compassion.
Yet behind the soft language and “beautiful death” headlines lies something much darker: a cultural campaign that devalues life itself (Blogger comment added – just like the Nazi thinking that now the Globalists have adopted through their controlled western political leaders who have put this process in flow for their Davos masters, where most of the senior WEF executives are descendants of the former Nazi hierarch… Schwab and van der Leyen for only two when you check into their Nazi heritage backgrounds)
When governments and suicide clinics become arbiters of who lives and who dies, even among the healthy, society crosses a moral line that can never be uncrossed.
The growing acceptance of euthanasia and assisted suicide is not compassion; it’s a slow, clinical erasure of the sanctity of human life.
World Freedom 