Blogger Comment: Are we being constantly ‘conned’ about interstellar cosmic objects and they are man-made to frighten the hell out of us so that we the people will pay out billions and even trillions over the years in equivalent US dollars so that the Globalist controlled space race is merely a great big hoax like ‘Global Warming’ which changed to ‘Climate Change’ because the science just did not add up…where I believe that the Globalists are to keep the people in huge debt on unprecedented science hoaxes and vast lies in the western world…period
Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb has accused NASA of withholding critical evidence, warning that the agency is deliberately concealing a bombshell image of the mysterious interstellar object 3I/ATLAS.
During an interview on “The Joe Rogan Experience” podcast, Loeb said the photograph in question was taken by the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) camera aboard NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO).
The shot reportedly captured the object as it passed within 30 million kilometers of Mars, an exceptionally close encounter for an object entering the solar system from interstellar space.
Loeb, who chaired Harvard’s Department of Astronomy from 2011 to 2020, said that when he tried to obtain the data directly, his request was shut down by NASA.
“I wrote to the principal investigator of HiRISE, asking, ‘Can I get the data? I’m a scientist,’” Loeb said.
He added that he received “no response” from NASA.
The object, officially designated 3I/ATLAS, has displayed several unusual features that have fueled scientific debate and speculation.
Many scientists have warned that 3I/ATLAS doesn’t exhibit several traits typically associated with comets.
According to The New York Post, the object emits jet-like outflows toward the Sun rather than away from it.
Experts note that solar blasts from the Sun should push the outflows away from its surface, not toward it.
This behavior contradicts conventional models of cometary activity.
The object also lacks a visible tail and has been observed emitting nickel without iron, a composition rarely seen in natural solar system bodies.
Loeb has previously suggested that these anomalies might warrant an unconventional explanation.
While he has raised the possibility that 3I/ATLAS could be artificial or of alien origin, he maintains that a more likely explanation is “terrestrial stupidity.”
Even so, he notes that the comet’s non-gravitational acceleration and unusual trajectory leave open questions about its true nature.
“If 3I/ATLAS is a massive mothership, it will likely continue along its original gravitational path and ultimately exit the Solar system,” Loeb wrote in a September blog post.
“In that case, the Oberth maneuver might apply to the mini-probes it releases at perihelion towards Solar system planets.”
“Science Is Guided by Evidence, Not Expectations”
Loeb urged that the only way to uncover the truth is through observation.
“Science is guided by evidence and not by expectations,” he wrote.
“We can find the answer to the above question by monitoring the sky during November and December 2025, and searching for any unusual activity of 3I/ATLAS or any new objects that came out of it.”
For now, Loeb says, the object appears most likely to be a natural comet.
However, he argues that scientists must remain open to unexpected possibilities.
“As of now, 3I/ATLAS appears most likely to be a natural comet,” he added.
“But the remote possibility of an Oberth maneuver must be considered seriously as a black swan event with a small probability, because of its huge implications for humanity.”
Blogger Comment:The EU needs desperately rescuing, as it is dying and with that their western living people…but is this a way of totally destroying western civilization by the Globalists it has to be asked, as they certainly cannot control the free-will of the greatest civilization that has ever lived on this planet and changed it for humanity like no other in its advancement…many think that it is and the USA could very well be next once the EU has fallen to the prey of the Globalist elites…where many are fellow Americans who will be seen as true traitors of the USA and all western civilization soon and the worst that there has even been in the history of the World !
German activist Naomi Seibt, known across Europe as the “Anti-Greta” for her outspoken criticism of globalism and defense of free speech, has filed for political asylum in the United States.
Seibt is claiming persecution in her home country for her political beliefs after she received death threats from the far-left terrorist group Antifa.
The 25-year-old free speech advocate submitted her petition under Section 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
She is asserting that returning to Germany would expose her to imprisonment or physical harm due to her political activism.
“I have now applied for asylum, which means that I’m waiting for an interview,” Seibt said in a statement.
“And, in the meantime, I’m here legally.
“My goal in the meantime is to become an American citizen in the future because this country has given me so much hope.”
Seibt said her decision came after years of harassment and state surveillance in Germany for expressing views at odds with the political mainstream.
“In 2024, I found out that I had been spied on by German intelligence for years,” she said.
“Simultaneously, I keep receiving death threats from Antifa.
“I went to the German police, and they told me that they can’t do anything about it as long as I have not actually been raped or killed.
“I am not getting protection from the German government even though I am at major risk of potentially being killed.”
A Free Speech Asylum Case Under Trump’s Policy Shift
Seibt’s application comes amid President Donald Trump’s refugee and asylum reform, which prioritizes applicants facing persecution for political speech or opposition to government censorship.
Under that policy, individuals from allied nations, including parts of Europe, can seek expedited review if they face credible threats or state retaliation for expressing dissenting opinions.
Seibt’s case appears to be among the first to test that framework.
She argues that Germany’s expanding speech laws and government surveillance have made it impossible for her to live safely in her home country.
“It is illegal to damage the reputation of a politician in Germany,” Seibt said.
“This law was extended under Angela Merkel — Article 188 — and now people are being arrested, and their houses are being raided for just social media posts.
“As soon as I come back to Germany, I feel that they will try to arrest me.”
The Rise of the “Anti-Greta”
Seibt rose to international prominence in 2020 as a conservative counterpoint to Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg.
While Thunberg became the face of the globalist green agenda, Seibt championed what she called “climate realism,” warning against political hysteria and media manipulation.
“I had started becoming known and internationally recognized as the anti-Greta Thunberg in 2020,” she recalled.
“I was barely 19 years old and never expected to be recognized as a right-wing figure.
“The German media called me the anti-Greta — they demonize me as the anti-Greta, like an anti-Christ for Greta Thunberg.”
Seibt said she wants to move beyond the label:
“I’m Naomi Seibt, and want to be recognized as who I am because I’m not just some puppet poster figure for the right wing.”
Connection with Elon Musk
Seibt also claims that her pro-free speech activism caught the attention of Elon Musk, who she says privately encouraged her decision to seek asylum.
“I made a post during the European elections in June 2024, where I said, my name is Naomi Seibt, and I’m voting for the AfD — and that was the very first time that Musk interacted with me,” she said.
“Elon privately messaged me on X about the AfD.”
She added that Musk shared her concerns about the growing climate of fear in Europe:
“Over the course of last year, I was obviously retweeted a lot by Elon Musk, and I interacted with him personally in private messages just about what’s going on in Germany,” she said.
“Elon has been terrified to go to Europe and knows that there is an extremely high threat and has confirmed this to me personally.
“That’s when I made the decision to apply for asylum myself.
“He gave me his approval for that.”
If granted asylum, Seibt would become one of the first high-profile European political dissidents to seek protection in the United States under Trump’s Free Speech Asylum Initiative.
The case marks a new chapter in the global debate over censorship, dissent, and Western democracy.
Blogger Comment: The world has to wake up to what is really happening in the world as the Globalists push their puppets western Political Leaders to commit crimes against humanity on an unprecedented scale never seen before and all because they have all been captured through blackmail like Epstein did for them or vast economic and financial pressure and guaranteed death threats through assassination that these Globalists wheeled on them, but all except the USA, Slovakia (EU) , Hungary(EU) and Italy(EU) currently…
A disturbing new medical study is raising alarm over Canada’s euthanasia regime after researchers praised the Canadian government’s “assisted suicide” program for boosting the organ-harvesting industry.
The study revealed that organs taken from people killed under the country’s “Medical Assistance in Dying” (MAiD) program are now being used in liver transplants, with results comparable to regular donations.
The findings, published in the Journal of Hepatology, are being hailed by liberal medical officials as a “success.”
However, the study is being widely condemned by critics as a chilling step toward normalizing organ harvesting from the euthanized.
The research compared liver transplants from “donations after circulatory death,” a controversial practice already used in Canada, to transplants from euthanasia victims.
“Our study provides the first large-scale Canadian experience, paralleling previous studies from Belgium and the Netherlands, showing that outcomes are positive, while also demonstrating the real impact that MAiD donation can have on the availability of organs,” said co-lead investigator A.M. James Shapiro.
“While not all individuals pursuing MAiD are suitable for donation for various reasons, we hope that our study will allow a better understanding of the potential role of organ donation following MAiD,” he continued.
Shapiro praised what he called “the final act of generosity” from euthanized donors, saying the practice shows “how impactful it can be for saving the lives of many people.”
But critics are warning that this is exactly the kind of rhetoric being used to expand Canada’s already radical euthanasia system.
Canada Leads the World in Harvesting Organs from the Euthanized
Canada now ranks first in the world for organ donations from euthanasia victims, surpassing Belgium and the Netherlands.
Under the Trudeau government’s rapid expansion of MAiD, Canadians who are depressed, sick, or unable to access adequate healthcare are being offered euthanasia, and, increasingly, their organs.
Interest in the practice has surged after reports surfaced of a Canadian man’s heart being harvested after euthanasia and transplanted into an American patient with heart failure.
Meanwhile, as many Canadians languish on waitlists for medical treatment, critics argue that the government’s priorities appear to have shifted from preserving life to profiting from death.
Estimates suggest that the black market value of human organs is staggering, with a heart worth roughly $1 million in the U.S., livers around $557,000, and kidneys approximately $262,000 each.
Human skin, stomachs, and eyeballs also carry high price tags, according to medical trade data cited by multiple outlets.
Experts Warn of Push to Harvest Organs Before Death
Medical ethicists and pro-life advocates have repeatedly sounded the alarm over the disturbing direction of euthanasia-linked organ harvesting.
As Slay News has previously reported, some doctors have openly discussed the idea of removing organs before euthanasia patients are declared dead, in order to keep organs “fresher” for transplant.
Conservative Irish scholar Dr. Angelo Bottone warned against this chilling proposal, writing:
“While donation after euthanasia is already happening in those countries, doctors are now discussing harvesting organs before euthanasia patients are declared dead, in order to preserve organ viability.”
“They propose that organs be removed under general anesthesia before the patient is declared dead, thereby maintaining continuous blood circulation and oxygenation to the organs until the moment of retrieval,” Bottone continued.
“This method could significantly improve the quality and quantity of organs available for transplantation.”
The warning underscores growing fears that euthanasia, once sold as a matter of “choice,” is becoming an industrialized system of state-facilitated organ procurement.
Euthanasia Now a Leading Cause of Death in Canada
According to recent data, euthanasia is now the sixth leading cause of death in Canada, yet it does not appear on the country’s official list of top causes of death.
Statistics Canada has admitted that it does not classify euthanasia itself as a cause of death, instead listing the illnesses that “led” to the decision to die.
Critics say that it is a deliberate way of obscuring the true scale of government-sanctioned killing.
Health Canada reported that in 2022, 13,241 Canadians were euthanized, accounting for 4.1% of all deaths that year.
That figure marked a 31.2% increase from 2021.
What began as a so-called compassionate “choice” for the terminally ill has now become a growing industry, one where Canadians’ deaths are increasingly intertwined with a lucrative organ transplant system.
A Grim Future
As Canada pushes further down this dark path, ethicists warn the world should take note.
The idea of harvesting organs from people intentionally killed by their own government was once unthinkable.
However, it is now being presented as a medical “innovation.”
Critics argue the message is unmistakable: when life becomes inconvenient or costly, the state will find a way to make it profitable.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is blasting NBC News for omitting key details about a violent criminal history in its coverage of an illegal alien’s arrest in California.
An NBC News affiliate described the illegal alien as an “undocumented father” while leaving out his shocking rap sheet, which includes arrests for battery and child sex abuse.
The controversy erupted after NBC Bay Area aired a sympathetic segment on the arrest of 42-year-old Gerardo Rojas-Leyva.
Rojas-Leyva was detained by federal agents in San Jose as he was leaving for work.
“According to the family’s Ring video, Gerardo was in his black truck at 7:45 a.m., about to head out to his construction job when multiple people, who appear to be federal officers, approached his truck and yelled for him to get out,” the report read.
The station added that the suspect’s wife, Idalia, who said she is a U.S. citizen, ran outside to intervene.
“She said a woman, not in uniform, hit her 22-year-old daughter with a baton — the incident, however, is not shown on the footage,” the affiliate reported.
But DHS officials say NBC’s reporting left out crucial information, namely, that Rojas-Leyva is an illegal alien from Mexico with a serious criminal record, including crimes involving a child and domestic violence.
DHS: NBC “Refuses to Tell the American Public” the Truth
Assistant DHS Secretary Tricia McLaughlin publicly rebuked the network in a post on X, accusing it of misleading viewers.
“Of course @NBCNews refuses to tell the American public that this illegal alien from Mexico has a rap sheet that includes: lewd and lascivious acts with a CHILD, battery of a spouse, domestic battery, compensation for prostitution, felony reentry after removal,” McLaughlin wrote.
In a detailed statement, McLaughlin confirmed that federal agents arrested Rojas-Leyva, who has been deported previously and re-entered the United States illegally.
“Rojas-Leyva’s criminal history includes lewd and lascivious acts with a child of 14-15 years old, battery of a spouse, inflicting corporal injury on a spouse/cohabitant, and providing compensation for prostitution,” McLaughlin said.
She added that the suspect resisted arrest and refused to identify himself, forcing an officer to deploy a taser before taking him into custody.
“Under President Trump and Secretary Noem, if you break the law, you will face the consequences,” McLaughlin warned.
“Criminal illegal aliens are not welcome in the U.S.”
NBC’s Pattern of Misleading Coverage
McLaughlin also pointed out that this is not the first time NBC has been accused of smearing federal immigration officers.
Earlier this year, the network ran a report alleging that ICE agents used a 5-year-old girl with autism to pressure her father, an illegal immigrant from Guatemala, to surrender.
McLaughlin blasted the story as a deliberate distortion.
“Keep in mind, these men and women of ICE are fathers and mothers, and they are sons and daughters,” she said on Fox & Friends.
“These are people who just want to go home to their families at night and serve our great nation.”
“It was a disgusting smear of ICE agents,” she added.
DHS: “Law Enforcement Will Continue to Do Its Job”
DHS officials emphasized that federal agents will continue enforcing immigration law despite media criticism and activist pushback.
McLaughlin said the department’s focus remains on removing criminal illegal aliens who pose a threat to public safety, not on appeasing “sanctuary politicians” or news outlets that obscure the facts.
“ICE officers will continue to carry out their duty,” a DHS spokesperson said Thursday.
“Media spin doesn’t change the reality that dangerous offenders have no right to remain in the United States.”
A stunning new report from the House Oversight Committee is sending shockwaves through Washington, D.C., and it could spell the end for Dr. Anthony Fauci, whose sweeping pardon may now be “void” under federal law.
New evidence has emerged that links Fauci to a high-level bribery scheme that sought to bury allegations of a Wuhan lab leak in the early days of the pandemic.
The 91-page document, released Tuesday by House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY), accuses senior aides of running a “shadow presidency” during former President Joe Biden’s final months in office.
Biden’s handlers are also accused of using the president’s autopen to issue official pardons without lawful authorization.
Among those pardons was Fauci’s, quietly approved at 10:30 p.m. in the final hours of Biden’s presidency by then–White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients, with no cameras, no announcement, and no presidential signature in person.
Comer’s team now says that all executive actions signed by autopen are “constitutionally void,” meaning Fauci’s pardon may carry no legal standing.
“We deem void President Biden’s executive actions that were signed using the autopen,” Comer stated, urging Attorney General Pam Bondi to review their legality.
If confirmed, the decision could expose Fauci to renewed criminal liability over alleged misconduct tied to the origins of COVID-19, or as the committee calls it, “Xi Jinping-19.”
New Documents Show Fauci Escorted Into CIA Headquarters — “No Record of Entry”
In what investigators are calling “damning” new evidence, documents released alongside the report reveal that Fauci was escorted by former CIA Director Gina Haspel into CIA headquarters — with no official record of entry or clearance log.
Once inside, Fauci allegedly participated in efforts to bribe CIA analysts to influence the agency’s internal review of the true origins of the virus.
The report states these actions were designed to “influence media narratives and spread misinformation and disinformation,” resulting in widespread public mistrust of legacy outlets that parroted the CIA’s conclusions.
“There was collusion. There was a conspiracy,” the report declares flatly.
The findings directly contradict years of denials from Fauci and intelligence officials who insisted there was “no evidence” linking the virus to U.S.-funded research in Wuhan.
According to internal communications obtained by the committee, Fauci’s pardon was authorized late at night, signed only by autopen, and never publicly disclosed.
“At 10:30 p.m., Dr. Anthony Fauci’s pardon was quietly approved by Biden’s White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients — using the president’s autopen signature,” the report reads.
“No cameras. No statements. Just a signature in the dark.”
That single sentence may now become one of the most consequential lines in recent political history.
Republicans argue that because Biden’s handlers, not Biden himself, executed the pardon, Fauci’s immunity from prosecution no longer applies.
Witnesses Plead the Fifth as Biden Team Implodes
The report also details a systematic effort by Biden’s staff to shield the president’s declining health and stage-manage his actions during the final months of his administration.
Former aides described a president whose schedule was reduced, appearances tightly scripted, and decisions preapproved by a small inner circle.
“These steps ranged from addressing President Biden’s makeup, clothing, schedule, the number of steps President Biden could walk or climb,” the report states, “keeping cabinet meetings to a minimum … and using teleprompters even at small, intimate events.”
Three senior officials, White House physician Dr. Kevin O’Connor, deputy chief of staff Annie Tomasini, and Jill Biden’s chief of staff Anthony Bernal, invoked their Fifth Amendment rights when questioned about Biden’s mental and physical fitness.
O’Connor refused to answer whether he had ever been told to lie about the president’s health or if he believed Biden was unfit for office.
Comer accused him of issuing “grossly misleading medical assessments.”
Democrats Cry Foul as Pressure Mounts
Democrats immediately dismissed the Oversight Committee’s findings as political theater.
“While House Republicans obsess about President Biden’s health, they are ripping away healthcare from 17 million Americans and spiking premiums,” said Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA), the panel’s ranking member.
But Comer said the evidence speaks for itself.
“This is one of the biggest political scandals in U.S. history,” he told reporters.
Legal experts say that although the Justice Department has previously upheld the autopen’s legitimacy, no court has ever ruled on the validity of pardons signed this way, meaning Fauci’s may indeed be legally vulnerable.
The Fall of Fauci
Once hailed by the corporate press as “America’s doctor,” Anthony Fauci now faces the real prospect of prosecution if his pardon is deemed invalid.
What began as an obscure technicality, a signature machine, could unravel the shield protecting him from accountability for his role in covering up the origins of COVID-19 and misleading Congress about U.S. gain-of-function research.
If Comer’s findings hold, Fauci’s pardon was never legitimate.
And if that’s true, then the man who once claimed to “represent science” may soon have to represent himself in court.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has rolled out a sweeping new surveillance initiative that allows the global body to monitor online conversations, media posts, and digital trends in real time.
The WHO insists that the new system will help to crack down on “misinformation” and promote “pandemic preparedness.”
According to the WHO, the system will be used to shut down conversations deemed to be “misleading” while allowing others considered “safe” to continue.
The new system is called Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources 2.0 (EIOS).
It is being presented as an upgrade in global health monitoring.
However, critics warn that it represents a far more concerning evolution.
The platform will serve as a fusion of disease tracking, information control, and social surveillance powered by artificial intelligence.
AI-Powered “Epidemic Intelligence”
Developed in partnership with the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC), EIOS 2.0 scours the internet for “signals” of “misinformation” in the public’s social media posts and comments.
The WHO argues that members of the public repeating “misinformation” should be viewed as potential health threats.
According to the WHO, the platform automatically analyzes social media posts, websites, and news outlets to detect early warnings of disease outbreaks.
However, EIOS’s scope goes well beyond viruses and vaccines.
The WHO’s own documentation admits that the system incorporates tools for “News Article Credibility Detection” and “Misinformation Classification.”
That means the same AI designed to track emerging epidemics is also being trained to flag, filter, and categorize information online.
The system would effectively turn a health monitoring network into a real-time censorship tool.
Fact-Checking on Steroids
The WHO’s collaboration with the JRC links EIOS to the “Misinfo Classifier.”
The machine-learning system was developed in 2020 to detect so-called “fake news” online.
According to the JRC, the classifier determines the credibility of information by analyzing tone, language, and sentiment, boasting an “80% success rate.”
The tool has already been deployed by the European Commission and European Parliament.
The WHO has now integrated similar mechanisms into its public health data infrastructure, effectively merging AI-based censorship with global pandemic surveillance.
Expanding the Surveillance Web
The WHO reports that EIOS now operates in over 110 countries and partners with more than 30 organizations, including national governments and EU institutions.
The platform is being offered “free of charge” to approved users.
The move effectively ties national monitoring systems into a WHO-managed global network that continuously collects, processes, and interprets public data.
The organization describes this process as “social listening.”
It’s defined as analyzing people’s “attitudes, beliefs, and intentions” to guide health communication strategies.
In reality, this allows a global bureaucracy to study and shape public opinion, using artificial intelligence to monitor and interpret human behavior at scale.
The New Face of Global Control
In its October 13 announcement, the WHO called EIOS 2.0 “more open, more agile and more inclusive.”
But beneath that polished language lies a powerful centralized system that blurs the line between health security and digital surveillance.
By merging artificial intelligence with state cooperation and media monitoring, the WHO is building a framework capable of tracking and classifying global discourse in real time, deciding which conversations are “relevant,” “safe,” or “misleading.”
For countries that adopt EIOS, the trade-off may be public health support in exchange for digital sovereignty.
Under the justification of “protecting global health,” the WHO is quietly constructing an always-on AI surveillance grid.
However, this system doesn’t just monitor diseases, but the very conversations that shape public consciousness.
What began as “pandemic preparedness” is rapidly morphing into something far broader: a global infrastructure for social control disguised as science.
Blogger Comment: This is another warning to ‘Humanity’ and this time for our children where more western governments are now lining up because they are all now controlled by the power and wealth of the richest people in the World the Davos Globalists, except 4 western nations, Slovakia, Hungary, Italy and the USA (the UK is falling in right now as you read this article unless the Lords stops them doing this in the lower house if they can), to euthanize them, but NOT humanly as they have no voice or choice if adults state that they have to die…sounds mad and abundantly evil to most intelligent people, but sadly it is very true…wake up world please, as they are now attacking directly our children more out in the open than ever before and that has extremely dark future overtones for humanity and where many within society’s people-loving masses would say are sinister I am perfectrly sure to the extreme for humanity’s future…
A leading expert has issued a stark warning about a rapidly expanding global push to begin euthanizing children.
In a bombshell report, investigative journalist Asra Nomani sounds the alarm about a chilling campaign to normalize the euthanasia of minors.
The new investigation exposes the international network driving the push.
In the report, Nomani uncovers what she describes as a multimillion-dollar global industry to target children. Nomani calls this coordinated movement, which seeks to urge children to embrace euthanasia, “Assisted Suicide Inc.”
“A Fox Digital investigation reveals opponents of euthanasia face a multimillion-dollar global lobby that could be called Assisted Suicide Inc. — a sprawling network changing laws worldwide, developing euthanasia services for funeral parlors, selling ‘suicide pods,’ promoting ‘suicide tourism’ and even training ‘doulas for death,’” Nomani wrote.
Her report, titled “‘Untold Damage’: Global Assisted Suicide Movement Targets Children,” documents how well-funded advocacy groups are now campaigning to extend assisted suicide laws to minors.
A Growing Global Industry
Nomani found that Belgium, Canada, the Netherlands, Colombia, Luxembourg, Spain, New Zealand, Australia, and 11 U.S. states already permit euthanasia or “physician-assisted suicide” under various conditions.
Alarmingly, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Colombia have expanded those laws to include so-called “mature minors.”
However, this vague term of “mature minors” does not specify ages for children, leaving it open to interpretation.
“These groups have a presence on every continent,” Nomani reported, “but are predominantly found in the West, which also faces alarmingly low birth rates.”
She identified 41 organizations in Europe, 31 in North America, and 13 in Oceania, many of which receive major institutional funding.
Targeting Youth Through Policy and Language
Advocates are now using terms like “mature minors” to justify expanding euthanasia to children under 18.
The National Youth Rights Association in the U.S. and the British Columbia Humanist Association in Canada are among the groups campaigning for minors to be eligible for “assisted suicide.”
Critics warn that this language mirrors tactics used in other controversial social movements, reframing moral and medical boundaries as “rights” while concealing the devastating long-term impact.
In Canada, the “Dying with Dignity” organization reported nearly $3 billion in expenses in 2024, including over $800,000 in promotional spending, to push for expanding access to euthanasia for minors.
The Numbers Tell the Story
Nomani’s research reveals a rapidly expanding industry:
In Canada, roughly 15,000 people died in 2023 through Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD), the government’s euthanasia program.
The figure marks a 16% increase from 2022 and makes euthanasia the fifth leading cause of death in the country.
In the Netherlands, where euthanasia has been legal since 2002, the practice accounted for 9,958 deaths in 2024, representing 5.8% of all deaths nationwide.
Dutch law permits doctors to euthanize children as young as one year old, including newborns “suffering unbearably with no prospects of improvement.”
In Belgium, six minors have requested euthanasia since it was legalized for children in 2014.
These figures show how quickly assisted suicide laws can expand once normalized, first for terminally ill adults, then for non-terminal cases, and now, increasingly, for minors.
From Compassion to Commerce
Experts warn that what began as a “compassionate choice” has evolved into a profit-driven industry.
Nomani’s findings show that euthanasia services are now marketed alongside funeral planning and “death tourism” packages, commodifying life-and-death decisions for financial gain.
The expansionary nature of what critics call the suicide industry echoes the trajectory of other highly politicized social causes.
Each new legal “exception” becomes a stepping stone toward broader acceptance and broader markets.
As more governments adopt euthanasia as a medical option, ethical boundaries are eroding.
What once was framed as an individual choice for the terminally ill is now being redefined as a “right” for anyone, including vulnerable young people.
A Global Crossroads
The rise of Assisted Suicide Inc. underscores a deeper moral and social crisis: the increasing willingness of institutions and policymakers to treat death as a solution.
Nomani’s investigation reveals that this global movement is coordinated, well-funded, and expanding rapidly.
What’s being presented as compassion for the suffering is, in practice, an institutional endorsement of despair, and a dangerous shift in how societies define dignity, care, and the value of human life.
A coalition of scientists is calling for a ban on processed meats such as bacon, ham, and sausages, warning that nitrite preservatives used in their production are directly linked to tens of thousands of preventable cancer cases.
The group says inaction from government regulators has allowed a public health crisis to grow while food manufacturers continue using the additives to keep meat pink and long-lasting.
The additives are often included in lower-quality processed meats that are typically imported from foreign sources and require longer shelf lives.
Scientists say the practice carries deadly consequences.
According to data from the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute, approximately 142,000 Americans are diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer each year.
Researchers estimate that thousands of those cases are linked to nitrite-cured meats commonly found in grocery stores.
The warning comes ten years after the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) officially classified processed meats as a Group 1 carcinogen, placing them in the same category as tobacco and asbestos.
Despite that classification, U.S. regulators have failed to impose restrictions on nitrites or require warning labels.
Professor Chris Elliott, founder of the Institute for Global Food Security and a leading voice in the movement to ban nitrites, said the delay has come at a devastating cost.
“A decade on from the WHO report, governments have done virtually nothing to reduce exposure to nitrites — the curing agents that make these products pink and long-lasting but also create nitrosamines, compounds known to trigger cancer,” Elliott said.
“Every year of delay means more preventable cancers, more families affected, and greater strain on healthcare systems.”
The scientists who contributed to the WHO’s 2015 findings have renewed their call for action, urging the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to consider banning nitrites in processed meats and requiring front-of-package warnings about the cancer risk.
Their landmark analysis, which reviewed data from more than 800 studies, found that eating just 50 grams of processed meat a day, about two strips of bacon, increases the risk of colorectal cancer by 18 percent.
Professor Robert Turesky of the University of Minnesota, who co-authored the original WHO report, said the evidence is now overwhelming.
“When the IARC report was published in 2015, evidence linking processed meat to cancer was strong,” Turesky said.
“A decade later, it is even stronger, and many preventable cancers have likely occurred.
“The evidence now calls for public health action.”
Researchers say the combination of nitrates and certain processing methods used in meats like bacon, ham, and sausages can create carcinogenic compounds when consumed.
Up to 90 percent of store-bought bacon in the U.S. contains nitrites, which scientists have linked not only to colorectal cancer but also to breast and prostate cancers.
The coalition is urging the federal government to fund a transition to safer alternatives already used by some smaller producers who make “nitrite-free” or “uncured” bacon, now a small but growing segment of the market.
Professor Elliott said that the meat industry has no excuse for inaction.
“Manufacturers should adopt natural curing alternatives already proven safe and effective,” he said.
“Every year of delay means more preventable cancer, more families affected, and greater strain on healthcare systems.”
Health experts emphasize that the concern lies specifically with processed and chemically treated meats, not with fresh, high-quality, pasture-raised meat.
Unprocessed beef, pork, and poultry that are naturally sourced and properly cooked remain nutritious and safe to eat, providing essential proteins, vitamins, and minerals.
Nutritionists continue to recommend well-sourced meat as part of a balanced diet, while limiting or avoiding industrially processed meats that rely on chemical preservatives.
Both the American Institute for Cancer Research and the World Cancer Research Fund recommend eating very little, if any, processed meat, citing its strong association with cancer risk.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) lists colorectal cancer as the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States.
Common symptoms include changes in bowel habits, persistent diarrhea or constipation, abdominal pain, unexplained weight loss, and blood in the stool.
Recent global data has also revealed a troubling trend, showing that colon cancer is rising sharply among younger adults, particularly those under 50.
Public health experts say the evidence is now too strong to ignore: unless action is taken, thousands more Americans could face a cancer diagnosis linked directly to what’s on their grocery store shelves.
Blogger Comment:For all those who believe that control is not coming to you soon…wake up or you will be eternally in a captured and tortured world order by 2030 when Gates and his other Globalist DAVOS friends will be the new rulers of the world..anything that Gates is involved with has to be pure evil based upon his history in Africa and India where 100s of thousands have died or suffered horrendously from his crimes against humanity…not to mention the 100s of milions around the world from his Covid-19 gadgets…for that’ss all they are killing gadgets and certainly NOT life-giving vaccines for sure… da Silva is positively evil as well as the Brazilian free-thinking people know that as well…two deadly snakes in cess pit here…
.
Brazil’s left-wing government has unveiled a sweeping new “anti-disinformation” online system that will track down dissenters and prosecute those caught using “disrespectful” speech.
Critics are calling the chilling new system, which is driven by artificial intelligence (AI), one of the most dangerous censorship tools in the Western Hemisphere.
The publicly funded project is designed to monitor, track, and criminally prosecute citizens who question radical ideology.
Branded the “Platform of Respect,” the initiative was launched by Brazil’s Ministry of Human Rights in partnership with the NGO Aliança Nacional LGBTI+.
It is funded with R$300,000 ($56K) in taxpayer money through a parliamentary amendment from Erika Hilton, a self-identified transgender politician.
The government claims the program will combat “disrespect,” “hate speech,” and “disinformation.”
But free speech advocates warn it is actually a direct attack on dissent.
The scheme creates a surveillance network that criminalizes speech and thought not aligned with state-sanctioned ideology.
Platform of Respect
At the center of the system is an artificial intelligence program named Aletheia.
According to its website, Aletheia is designed to “track the origin of disinformation, report its impact, and enable accountability for authors and disseminators.”
In practice, the AI is being used to flag citizens who allegedly “misgender” public figures or make statements contradicting gender ideology.
Such offenses can now lead to lengthy prison sentences under the socialist government of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.
Tracking and Prosecuting Speech
According to reports, Aletheia doesn’t just monitor misinformation; it actively identifies individuals for potential prosecution.
One high-profile example cited by local media involves Isabella Cêpa, a feminist activist who was forced to flee Brazil and seek asylum in Europe after referring to Hilton as male.
For that remark, she faced up to 25 years in prison before ultimately being vindicated.
The groundwork for such prosecutions was laid in 2019, when Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court declared that “discrimination against LGBT individuals” was legally equivalent to racism, effectively making “transphobia” a criminal offense.
Since then, the law has been used to punish Brazilians for words and opinions, not actions, that contradict state-approved narratives.
During the September 16 launch event in Brasília, platform coordinator Jean Muksen described how the system functions as a 24/7 surveillance engine.
“We created a platform with several artificial intelligence tools that continuously monitor pages, profiles, websites, and blogs,” Muksen said.
Muksen added that the software interprets “nuances” such as irony and sarcasm.
Once flagged, the content is stored, reviewed by a lawyer hired by the NGO, and then forwarded to the courts for potential prosecution.
Government-Funded Ideological Policing
According to Gp1, the platform operates as both a “fact-checking” and enforcement mechanism, employing legal and communications experts for 18 months to identify “problematic” online behavior.
Muksen confirmed that Aletheia’s surveillance targets citizens, members of Congress, state legislators, journalists, influencers, and news outlets.
Anyone with a public platform who challenges official orthodoxy is a target.
The NGO’s permanent team, consisting of a coordinator, lawyer, journalist, and designer, maintains the system at an annual taxpayer-funded cost of R$140,000 ($26K).
Critics argue that this combination of AI surveillance, activist enforcement, and government funding has created a digital policing regime that blurs the line between justice and ideological control.
Speech as a Crime
Under Brazil’s expanding hate-speech laws, any statement suggesting that biological sex is immutable can now be classified as “discrimination” or “transphobia.”
Analysts warn that the Platform of Respect is not a defensive tool against misinformation; it is a weapon of state power built to erase opposition under the guise of tolerance.
By merging artificial intelligence with ideological enforcement, Brazil has developed a system that effectively turns private thought into a potential criminal act.
Many fear this high-tech model of censorship that could soon spread beyond its borders.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has just made the explosive admission that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are spiked with contaminations that triggered a global surge in cancers.
The federal agency made the admission after an FDA study confirmed that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccine” contains dangerous levels of excess DNA contamination.
As Slay News previously reported, leading scientists have been warning for some time that surges in deadly cancers among the Covid-vaccinated were caused by DNA fragments in the mRNA injections.
Those warnings have now been confirmed in a bombshell study conducted in the FDA’s own laboratory.
Tests conducted at the FDA’s White Oak Campus in Maryland found shocking levels of DNA contamination in the “vaccines.”
The residual DNA levels exceeded regulatory safety limits by 6 to 470 times.
While six times the safe limit would be alarming, 470 times is unprecedented and devastating.
The vaccine vials used during the study were sourced from BEI Resources.
BEI is a trusted supplier affiliated with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), previously headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci.
The findings of the peer-reviewed study were published in the Journal of High School Science.
The study finally shuts down years of dismissals by regulatory authorities, who had previously labeled concerns about excessive DNA contamination as baseless.
The FDA is expected to comment on the findings this month.
However, the agency has yet to issue a public alert, recall the affected batches, or explain how vials exceeding safety standards were allowed to reach the market.
The FDA researchers employed two primary analytical methods:
NanoDrop Analysis – This technique uses UV spectrometry to measure the combined levels of DNA and RNA in the vaccine. While it provides an initial assessment, it tends to overestimate DNA concentrations due to interference from RNA, even when RNA-removal kits are utilized.
Qubit Analysis – For more precise measurements, the researchers relied on the Qubit system, which quantifies double-stranded DNA using fluorometric dye.
Both methods confirmed the presence of DNA contamination far above permissible thresholds.
Kevin McKernan, a former director of the Human Genome Project, described the findings as a “bombshell.”
In a statement, he blasted the FDA for its lack of transparency.
“These findings are significant not just for what they reveal but for what they suggest has been concealed from public scrutiny,” McKernan said.
“Why has the FDA kept these data under wraps?”
In addition to genome integration, McKernan highlighted another potential cancer-causing mechani
sm of DNA contamination in the vaccines.
He explained that plasmid DNA fragments entering the cell’s cytoplasm with the help of lipid nanoparticles could overstimulate the cGAS-STING pathway.
The cGAS-STING pathway is a crucial component of the innate immune response.
“Chronic activation of the cGAS-STING pathway could paradoxically fuel cancer growth,” McKernan warned.
“Repeated exposure to foreign DNA through COVID-19 boosters may amplify this risk over time, creating conditions conducive to cancer development.”
Adding to the controversy, traces of the SV40 promoter were detected among the DNA fragments.
While the authors concluded that these fragments were “non-replication-competent” meaning they cannot replicate in humans, McKernan disagreed.
“To assert that the DNA fragments are non-functional, they would need to transfect mammalian cells and perform sequencing, which wasn’t done here,” McKernan stated.
“Moreover, the methods used in this study don’t effectively capture the full length of DNA fragments,” he added.
“A more rigorous sequencing analysis could reveal SV40 fragments several thousand base pairs long, which would likely be functional.”
McKernan has been one of the leading voices sounding the alarm over the cancer-causing DNA in the Covid “vaccines.”
As Slay News previously reported, McKernan issued a warning to the public last month after discovering traces of Covid mRNA “vaccines” in the rapidly developing cancerous tumors of turbo cancer patients.
Dr. McKernan, a genomics scientist with 25 years of experience in his field, made the discovery during experiments in his Boston lab.
McKernan gene-sequenced a cancerous tumor, matching the genetic sequence to Pfizer’s Covid mRNA injection.
The discovery is being hailed as definitive proof that Covid mRNA “vaccines” cause cancer.
“We’re in the stage where we’re scanning through tumors to look for integration events and looking for evidence of this in cancer biopsies,” McKernan said.
“And we can find them now.”
“They found one that had really high spike [protein] sent to us for sequencing.
“And we can find components of Pfizer’s vaccines inside this thing a year after vaccination.”
Immunology Professor Nikolai Petrovsky, the director of Vaxine Pty Ltd, described the findings from the new FDA study as a “smoking gun.”
“It clearly shows the FDA was aware of these data,” Petrovsky notes.
“Given that these studies were conducted in their own labs under the supervision of their own scientists, it would be hard to argue they were unaware.”
Prof Petrovsky praised the quality of work carried out by the students at the FDA labs.
“The irony is striking,” he remarked.
“These students performed essential work that the regulators failed to do.
“It’s not overly complicated—we shouldn’t have had to rely on students to conduct tests that were the regulators’ responsibility in the first place.”
The SV40 promoter is a DNA sequence derived from the Simian Virus 40 that enhances gene expression in eukaryotic cells by driving the transcription of genes placed under its control.
A growing number of leading experts have warned that SV40 is causing cancers to surge among the Covid-vaccinated.
SV40 has been linked to cancer in humans, including mesotheliomas, lymphomas, and cancers of the brain and bone.
The study comes amid increasing warnings that Covid mRNA injections cause cancer.
A world-renowned professor of oncology has issued a chilling warning about Covid mRNA “vaccines” after concluding that the “evil” injections have triggered a global “explosion” in cases of deadly “turbo cancers.”
The warning was issued by Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, as Slay News reported.
Prof. Dalgleish, who is best known for his groundbreaking contributions to HIV/AIDS research, raised the alarm during an international forum of experts investigating the mass Covid vaccination campaign.
He warned that he has seen an “explosion” of deadly “turbo cancers” in his patients who have received Covid mRNA injections.
While addressing the Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International forum, founded by Dr. Stephen Frost and moderated by Charles Kovess, Dalgleish told the panel of experts:
“We must stop messenger RNA [mRNA] at all costs… it’s not only mad, it’s evil.”
As Slay News previously reported, documents have also emerged showing that Moderna has always known that the pharmaceutical giant’s Covid mRNA shots cause cancer.
Last year, a world-renowned vaccine expert presented evidence during congressional testimony showing that Moderna knew of the cancer links.
Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, testified during a hearing on Capitol Hill led by Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA).
During his testimony, Malone presented the patent for Moderna’s Covid vaccine.
Moderna’s patent shows that its COVID-19 vaccine vials contain billions of DNA fragments.
Those fragments, along with other contaminants, are linked to birth defects and cancer, Malone explained.
In the patent, Moderna admits that contaminants in the shots cause cancer.
“Moderna has a patent on the use of RNA for vaccines,” Malone told the hearing.
“And in that, Moderna explicitly acknowledges that RNA is superior to DNA for vaccine purposes because of problems, including the possibility of insertional mutagenesis that could lead to the activation of oncogenes or the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes.
“FDA says they’re not aware of any concerns, but Moderna in its own patent lays out exactly the same concerns that exist about DNA in insertional mutagenesis and genotoxicity.
“So, Moderna knows it – DNA is a contaminant.
“It is left in because of the way they make it … they use DNA to make RNA, and then they degrade the DNA, and then they have to purify the degraded DNA away from the RNA.
“And the process they are using is apparently not that good.”
Now that DNA contamination of the mRNA vaccines has been verified in an official federal agency’s laboratory and published in a peer-reviewed journal, it is no longer possible to ignore.
World Freedom 