FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi have released explosive new files to Congress showing how Bill and Hillary Clinton’s foundation collected foreign and domestic donations from those seeking influence over the U.S. government.

However, these payments were never investigated fully for influence-peddling schemes.

The files are being called the “Clinton Corruption Files,” and Patel and Bondi plan to make them public in the next week or two once some information related to the whistleblowers is removed.

The evidence will show that there was an effort “to obstruct legitimate inquiries into the Clinton Foundation by blocking real investigation by line-level FBI agents and DOJ field prosecutors and keeping them from following the money,” an official who has seen the files said.

The Clinton Foundation was started after Bill left office in 2000.

However, some of the contributions were received while Hillary served as Secretary of State under Barack Obama.

Cash again started to flow into the organization when Hillary Clinton ran for president in 2016.

Yet, the flood of donations mysteriously stopped when Hillary was defeated by President Donald Trump.

Whistleblowers in 2015 said that some of the documents and evidence were kept from investigators in Little Rock, Arkansas.

The Democrat power couple lived in Little Rock before Bill Clinton became president.

The investigation was soon shut down by order of Obama Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, a Clinton ally.

If the evidence bears out, it appears that former President Joe Biden wasn’t the first powerful executive branch figure to run a pay-to-play scheme out of the White House.

In fact, there were three separate investigations into the Clintons that were all shut down by Yates.

According to Trump officials, the documents show that lower-level FBI agents and prosecutors prevented evidence from getting to decision makers in the multiple investigations of the Clinton Foundation.

It’s not at all surprising that damning evidence about the Clintons was buried so deeply that it never came to light.

Anyone familiar with the speculation surrounding the Clinton Foundation for years will not be surprised by the revelations by Patel and Bondi.

Republicans long thought that the foundation was a corrupt vehicle for influence peddling.

However, they never had any hard evidence until now.

Unfortunately, the statute of limitations on influence peddling is five years.

So, unless there is evidence of a crime without a statute of limitations, the Clintons will once again get off scot-free.

Other than propping up their legacies, the Clintons don’t appear phased by such allegations.

Nevertheless, exposing the scheme would give away the Democrat playbook.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/doj-bombshell-clinton-corruption-files-exposing-foundations-foreign-funding/

And,

READ MORE – Ted Cruz Puts Anti-Trump Activist Judges on Notice

Podcast host Joe Rogan criticized the BBC this week following revelations that the network deceptively edited footage of President Donald Trump’s January 6, 2021, speech.

Rogan is calling the scandal evidence of “the deep rot” within mainstream media.

The controversy stems from a BBC “Panorama” documentary that aired recently about Trump’s remarks before the U.S. Capitol protest on January 6, 2021.

The program has drawn widespread backlash after viewers discovered that editors omitted Trump’s call for supporters to protest “peacefully” and spliced together lines spoken nearly an hour apart, making them appear as a single continuous statement.

Producers also added additional background noise to make the crowd of Trump supporters sound menacing.

Trump’s legal team has since threatened to file a $1 billion lawsuit against the BBC if the “false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements” are not immediately retracted.

The fallout has already led to the resignations of BBC News CEO Deborah Turness and Director-General Tim Davie, both of whom stepped down amid the growing controversy.

Rogan Calls It ‘Propaganda, Not Journalism’

Discussing the issue on his popular podcast, Rogan said the edited documentary represented “not journalism, but full-on lying and propaganda.”

“It seems like these people—this is just my opinion—felt justified for completely lying, because it would lead to an ultimate good,” Rogan said.

“So they lost all journalistic integrity.

“And it is the BBC, which is like the height of journalistic integrity.”

Rogan argued that the scandal undermines public confidence in traditional news organizations.

“If that doesn’t show the rot of mainstream, corporate-controlled media, then nothing does. Because that’s pure rot,” he said.

“At the top of the heap, if someone quoted a source and it was the BBC, I’d think, ‘OK, that’s like The Washington Post or The New York Times.’

“It’s a very official source, so I’d assume, ‘This must be real.’”

Rogan said the incident marked a turning point for how audiences view legacy media outlets.

“They turned it into activism, and they turned it into lying — and they did it in front of everyone, where you could clearly just listen to the full speech and know he didn’t say that,” Rogan said.

“That’s not how he said it at all.”

WATCH: Click on the link to view the video below… Joe Rogan: BBC ‘Felt Justified in Completely Lying’ About Trump

Growing Backlash Over BBC Credibility

The controversy has sparked renewed debate over media ethics and editorial accountability, particularly within publicly funded broadcasters.

Critics argue that the BBC’s editing of Trump’s remarks reflects a broader erosion of trust in major news outlets.

The network has yet to publicly release an unedited version of the footage, though it has issued a brief statement acknowledging “editorial errors” and pledging to “review internal standards.”

The incident follows similar recent controversies involving major Western media organizations accused of selective editing or misrepresentation in politically sensitive coverage.

Trump, for his part, said the BBC documentary was “a deliberate fraud” and accused the network of attempting to “rewrite history” by distorting his remarks about January 6.

The legal demand sent by Trump’s attorneys gives the BBC a limited window to retract or correct the segment before the lawsuit proceeds.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/joe-rogan-bbc-felt-justified-completely-lying-trump-propaganda/

And,

READ MORE – Trump Gives BBC Ultimatum: Apologize for ‘False, Defamatory’ Reporting or Face $1 Billion Lawsuit

Blogger Comment: Yet another scandal with Canada’s Euthanasia programme that is accelerating at rate of knots not seen anywhere else in the world and to their military veterans now who kept the Canadian people safe and put their lives on the line for their nation…what a way to thank them by their Davos Globalist Carney Liberal Government and what they are doing to them is utterly disgraceful, where their government is forgetting what they have done for their nation and where now this appears to be a no holds bar situation to specifically  eliminate them as they are now seen it appears, as a cost to the nation for them to exist…why would anyone do this who has any human moral compass, but where it shows how this euthanasia programmes are manipulated to the governments narrative and unrestricted outcomes…for them in power…

An alarming testimony before Canada’s House of Commons has blown open grave allegations that the Liberal government is ramping up pressure to euthanize military veterans under the nation’s rapidly expanding “assisted suicide” regime.

The explosive allegations were revealed in a parliamentary testimony from Kelsi Sheren, a Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) veteran.

Sheren told MPs during a hearing before the Canadian Veterans Affairs Committee that she has firsthand evidence showing the practice is far more widespread than officials admit.

She told the nation’s top lawmakers that she has evidence that multiple veterans have been pressured into being euthanized under the government’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program.

Sheren testified that “over 20 veterans have confirmed being offered MAiD” instead of more expensive treatments.

“I have the proof, and I have proof of more,” she told lawmakers.

The claims follow recent reports that Canada’s socialized healthcare system is now saving $136 million a year by euthanizing patients instead of treating them.

During the hearing, Conservative MP Blake Richards asked Sheren if she was willing to provide evidence supporting her claims.

Sheren confirmed that the veterans have submitted written testimonies or “actual audio recordings” documenting the unsolicited offers of euthanasia.

According to Sheren, many others remain silent out of fear.

“We also have other individuals who are too afraid to come forward because Veterans Affairs has threatened their benefits,” she said.

Sheren, a Canadian combat veteran and artillery gunner, added that some were even offered non-disclosure agreements and “payouts if they were to take it.”

Veterans Affairs Canada told media outlets that its “employees have no role or mandate to recommend or raise (MAiD).”

Yet similar allegations have surfaced before.

Last year, it was revealed that the federal department responsible for supporting Canadian veterans had apparently acted to suppress documentation on euthanasia practices.

It followed reports that caseworkers attempted to railroad struggling former service members into euthanasia.

Slay News previously published a report highlighting bombshell revelations from Sheren on the treatment of veterans.

Sheren explained on a podcast with Dr. Jordan Peterson last year that the drugs used in MAiD essentially waterboard a person to death.

Assisted suicide was legalized in 2016 by the Liberal government of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

A new report from the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition shows the devastating scale of the program: Canada has euthanized 90,000 people since 2016.

However, some are still hopeful that the Liberal government’s eugenics agenda can be turned around.

Last week, a Conservative MP’s private member’s bill, which would ban individuals with mental illness from being euthanized, received full support from the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.

The revelations point to an alarming reality that Canada’s euthanasia system is no longer confined to edge-case medical situations.

Instead, it is increasingly becoming a state-endorsed “solution” for vulnerable citizens, including those who once served their country.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/bombshell-testimony-exposes-canadian-governments-push-euthanize-veterans/

And,

READ MORE – Canada’s Euthanasia Deaths Surge to Record Highs, Data Shows

A church leader in the UK says police warned him that he may face a criminal investigation because a Bible verse displayed on the back of his campervan could be treated as “hate speech.”

The story is yet another chilling example of how far Britain’s crackdown on religious expression has gone.

Pastor Mick Fleming, 59, who runs an independent church and anti-poverty charity in Burnley, said he was approached by a police officer at a gas station on October 27.

The officer warned Fleming that the Scripture on his vehicle might be considered hateful “in the wrong context.”

The verse was John 3:16, one of the most widely known and quoted passages in the Christian faith:

“For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life.”

According to Fleming, the officer tapped him on the shoulder and quietly issued the warning.

“He was a really nice guy, wasn’t nasty or anything, and he said ‘a bit of advice – the writing could be seen as hate speech in the wrong context. I am just giving you a heads up,’” Fleming said.

The officer allegedly cautioned him that if anyone complained, police would “investigate” and he “could end up in trouble.”

Fleming said the exchange left him stunned.

“I just thought ‘wow’ – I just wondered what people thought … where have we moved to as a country where a bit of Christian scripture on the back of a van can be seen as hateful or spiteful?”

He added:

“Maybe society is moving to a place where they don’t want faith-based people sat around a table in discussion with them … for me it’s an integral message of how real change is possible.”

Fleming, who now lives in the van after giving up his belongings, posted a video describing the encounter and asked viewers for their thoughts.

He says he refuses to remove the verse.

“I’m not going to change it,” he said, insisting the Scripture is not “spiteful or hateful.”

Online commenters overwhelmingly defended him.

One wrote:

“There’s nothing wrong with the sign, it’s all positive, so I don’t get why it’s a problem.

“It’s not offensive in the slightest.”

Another added:

“Hate speech? It’s the complete opposite. It’s love speech.

“In fact, even the word love sells God’s feelings for us so short.”

A Pastor Once Caught in Crime, Now Targeted for His Faith

Fleming’s story from drug dealer and armed “fixer” to pastor serving the homeless is well known in the UK.

He has been featured on the TV show Songs of Praise, and even praised by the Prince of Wales, who said he was “deeply moved” by his work.

Fleming says his transformation began in 2009 when he believed he was visited by an angel, leading him to abandon his criminal life.

Concerns Grow Over Misuse of Hate Speech Law

Lancashire Police claim they have no record of the encounter and stated:

“We would not consider this to be hate speech and would ask the person in question to speak to us directly so that we could look into the matter.”

But free speech campaigners note that police have repeatedly misused hate speech laws to target Christians.

President Donald Trump’s administration even raised alarms in August, warning that Britain was engaged in a broad clampdown on expression, citing “credible reports of serious restrictions on freedom of expression.”

A Bible Verse as a Crime?

Under UK law, displaying Bible verses publicly is typically lawful.

However, authorities have the power to pursue charges if they believe wording could be interpreted as “threatening” or intended to “stir up hatred.”

That discretion has increasingly put ordinary religious individuals in the crosshairs.

Fleming says the entire incident reflects a darker shift.

A country once rooted in free expression and Christian tradition is now warning pastors that Scripture, even the Gospel’s central message, could be a criminal offense.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/uk-police-warn-pastor-investigated-hate-speech-over-bible-verse-camper/

And,

READ MORE – UK Government: First Amendment Doesn’t Protect Americans from British Censorship Laws

Canada’s federal government is quietly moving forward with a national digital ID system, slipping the plan into the depths of its 2025 budget where almost no one would notice.

On page 490 of the massive document, the Liberal Party government proposes to “modernize legislative authorities to support information sharing and digital services” within the Department of Employment and Social Development.

However, the bland language masks a sweeping shift toward centralized digital identification.

The plan begins with a seemingly limited pilot: digital IDs for people applying for Employment Insurance and Old Age Security.

But the budget makes clear the ultimate goal is a fully integrated identity system linking multiple benefit programs under a single government-controlled profile.

“This modernization would benefit all Canadians,” the budget claims.

It continues by promising “efficient and convenient government services” and supposedly helping “seniors, newcomers, persons with disabilities, and rural residents.”

But critics note the pattern and warn that governments always pitch digital ID as “convenience,” only for it to expand into a universal surveillance and control tool once the infrastructure is built.

A Slow Creep Toward a Unified, Centralized ID

The federal bureaucracy has floated digital ID schemes before, only to retreat when public backlash erupted over privacy fears.

This time, the rollout is quieter. Narrower.

It’s framed as “modernizing benefits delivery” instead of erecting a national ID regime.

But behind the scenes, the architecture is already taking shape.

In 2024, Employment and Social Development Canada hired private consultants to explore merging its fragmented benefit systems.

Their conclusion was to mandate integration through a single digital identity, serving as a master key granting access to multiple programs, eliminating paperwork, and centralizing personal data in one place.

The department says the goal is “more integrated and efficient services across government.”

In practice, it means creating the largest single repository of citizens’ most sensitive data.

Massive Privacy Risks, Minimal Transparency

Digital identity systems consolidate everything, such as banking details, biometric data, health records, and government history, into a single target.

One breach exposes everything, and the centralized gatekeepers have control over all of it.

Canada’s own privacy commissioner warned in 2024 that public trust in data protection is collapsing, citing “limited trust” and deep concern about how institutions handle personal information.

The report also highlighted the rise of “state-sanctioned” data breaches, a stark reminder that foreign actors, and even governments themselves, see digital ID as a goldmine.

Yet the government insists participation will remain voluntary and that traditional services, whether they’re in-person, mail, or phone, will continue.

But history shows “voluntary” digital systems eventually become impossible to opt out of as analog options are phased out.

Even the budget admits major obstacles: “Digital literacy gaps among seniors,” “connectivity issues,” and “language barriers” for newcomers.

But these warnings haven’t slowed the rollout.

A Global Push Toward Government-Backed Digital Identity

Canada is not alone.

The move comes as governments worldwide are steering citizens toward centralized identification:

  • UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has revived Britain’s digital ID plans.

  • Australia’s 2024 Digital ID Bill advances a nationwide identity system.

  • The EU’s Digital Identity Wallet aims to link credentials across borders.

Each initiative is framed as modernization.

Each expands state access to personal information.

And each follows an eerily similar script: convenience first, surveillance potential later.

A Major Shift Hidden In Plain Sight

Whether Canada’s proposal becomes the foundation of a national digital ID will depend on how far the government pushes “information sharing” and “integration.”

For now, the changes are buried quietly in the budget, but the direction is unmistakable.

A slow, steady transformation is underway, redefining how Canadians interact with their government, how their identities are authenticated, and how much control the state has over access to everyday services.

And once a digital ID system is built, history shows it rarely stops at “convenience.”

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-government-quietly-advances-plan-national-digital-id/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Man Devastated After Government Euthanizes Both Grandmothers

President Donald Trump is threatening a $1 billion lawsuit against the BBC, accusing the British state broadcaster of publishing “false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements” in a Panorama documentary that deceptively edited key portions of his January 6, 2021, speech.

Trump’s litigation counsel sent a formal notice on Sunday to BBC Chair Samir Shah and general counsel Sarah Jones.

The White House is giving the network until Friday to retract the statements or face legal action.

The letter argues the BBC’s documentary, “Trump: A Second Chance,” intentionally misled viewers by removing Trump’s call for supporters to protest “peacefully and patriotically.”

Portions of the speech were spliced together to make it appear as though Trump was calling on his supporters to turn violent.

The report also added additional sounds to make the crowd appear aggressive.

The controversy has already triggered upheaval inside the BBC: Director-General Tim Davie and BBC News and Current Affairs chief Deborah Turness both stepped down in recent days after intense criticism over the documentary.

BBC Fabricated Content to Influence the 2024 Election

Trump’s attorneys say the Panorama episode spliced together unrelated segments of his Jan. 6 remarks to imply he incited violence, an omission critics say completely reversed the meaning of his speech.

According to Trump’s legal team, the BBC broadcast Trump saying:

“We’re gonna walk down to the Capitol, and I’ll be there with you, and we fight.

“We fight like hell, and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”

But Trump actually told supporters:

“We’re going to walk down, and I’ll be there with you.

“We’re going to walk down, we’re going to walk down any one of you but I think right here, we’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women.”

It further states the BBC edited out a crucial line:

“I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”

Attorney Alejandro Brito wrote that the BBC’s actions constituted defamation under Florida law, arguing that the edited statements “were fabricated and aired by the BBC” and have been “widely disseminated,” causing “overwhelming financial and reputational harm.”

The deceptively edited clips spread widely across social media, fueling anti-Trump sentiment on a global level.

Legal Team: BBC Acted With “Actual Malice”

Trump’s counsel says the BBC has “no viable defense” and displayed “reckless disregard for the truth,” adding:

“Failure to comply will leave President Trump with no choice but to pursue any and all legal rights and remedies available to recover damages… with all rights and remedies being expressly reserved.”

The letter demands a full and prominent retraction, an apology, and compensation, and orders the BBC to preserve all documents related to the documentary.

A BBC spokesperson responded cautiously:

“We will review the letter and respond directly in due course.”

BBC Crisis Deepens After Whistleblower Exposé

The fallout comes after The Telegraph published excerpts from internal documents written by communications adviser Michael Prescott, who was hired to review BBC editorial standards.

The materials sharply criticized the broadcaster’s handling of the Trump documentary, reporting on transgender issues, and accusations of anti-Israel bias in its Arabic service.

Turness cited the mounting controversy when she resigned, saying it “has reached a stage where it is causing damage to the BBC,” adding, “the buck stops with me.”

BBC Tried to “Step on the Scales” of an American Election

Trump reacted Sunday after the executives’ departures, writing on Truth Social:

“The TOP people in the BBC, including TIM DAVIE, the BOSS, are all quitting/FIRED, because they were caught ‘doctoring’ my very good (PERFECT!) speech of January 6th.”

He thanked The Telegraph for exposing the edits, calling the BBC employees “Corrupt ‘Journalists’” and warning that they tried to interfere in a U.S. presidential election, “on top of everything else,” from “a Foreign Country” considered a key U.S. ally.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has also blasted the BBC as “100% fake news” and a “propaganda machine,” telling The Telegraph:

“This purposefully dishonest, selectively edited clip by the BBC is further evidence that they are total, 100% fake news that should no longer be worth the time on the television screens of the great people of the United Kingdom.”

Final Notice: $1 Billion Lawsuit If BBC Doesn’t Comply by Nov. 14

Trump’s legal team concluded their letter with a deadline:

“If the BBC does not comply… by November 14, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. EST, President Trump will be left with no alternative but to… file legal action for no less than $1,000,000,000 (One Billion Dollars) in damages.

“The BBC is on notice.”

The BBC, already destabilized by resignations and internal criticism, now faces a potential legal battle with the president of the United States, one that could have enormous financial and reputational stakes.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/trump-gives-bbc-ultimatum-apologize-false-defamatory-reporting-face-1-billion-lawsuit/

And,

READ MORE – Federal Judge Quits with Anti-Trump Meltdown, Rages Over ‘Angry Attacks on the Courts’

Canada is facing a new wave of public outrage after federal agents slaughtered hundreds of healthy ostriches at a British Columbia (BC) farm last week, an operation supporters describe as “inhumane,” “unnecessary,” and a chilling example of a government that increasingly defaults to force over science.

The late-night raid unfolded at Universal Ostrich Farms in Edgewood, where Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) personnel, aided by Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), opened fire on the birds for hours.

At least two shooters, believed to be CFIA “marksmen” from the agency’s Enforcement Investigation and Services Unit, pumped hundreds of rounds into the flock.

The farm’s owners and supporters watched helplessly as the birds were gunned down by the federal government.

Witnesses say many ostriches were left injured and crying out through the night until CFIA inspectors returned at dawn to decapitate those still alive.

Supporters described scenes of chaos and cruelty.

One person recounted online:

“They were gunned down in the dark, over hours… the gunshots, the agonizing sounds of the birds, the screaming… it was absolutely f**** sickening.”

No Protective Gear Despite CFIA Claiming ‘Pathogenic Risk’

Despite insisting the birds posed a highly pathogenic avian flu danger, the shooters wore no protective equipment beyond balaclavas.

RCMP officers later sifted through blood-soaked debris with bare hands to load carcasses into bins sent to an undisclosed disposal site.

Supporters tracked vehicles amid fears the birds were being moved toward the Surrey port for ocean dumping.

CFIA Refused to Test the Birds

The Canadian government had provided no evidence that the birds posed a bird flu risk.

Universal Ostrich Farms had pleaded for testing for months, saying the flock appeared healthy and had developed antibodies, natural immunity that could provide valuable insight into H5N1 containment.

However, the CFIA refused.

Instead, the agency pushed ahead with “depopulation,” asserting it was following its stamping-out policy under the Health of Animals Act.

The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the farm’s final appeal Thursday.

Farm Owners: ‘Our Hearts Are Empty’

Farm spokeswoman Katie Pasitney, who kneeled in the rain begging agents to stop, described the emotional devastation:

“Our hearts are empty… It doesn’t matter if it’s a chicken or a 35-year-old ostrich; no animal should have to die inhumanely, neglected, tortured.”

The CFIA maintains that shooting hundreds of birds over several hours was “the most appropriate and humane option.”

Yet the agency’s own manuals say shooting should be used only as a “last resort.”

Growing Anger Over Government Overreach

The raid is resonating far beyond British Columbia.

Many Canadians, already wary of federal power after years of aggressive pandemic policies and world-leading euthanasia expansion, now see the ostrich cull as another example of heavy-handed government behavior masquerading as “public health.”

In recent years, Canada has drawn international scrutiny for its rapidly expanding Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) regime, which now permits euthanasia for non-terminal conditions and is slated for another major expansion in 2027.

Critics say Ottawa’s instinct to eliminate problems “at the root,” whether vulnerable people or entire animal populations, reflects a broader shift toward bureaucratic convenience over compassion.

U.S. Figures Call for Investigation

The slaughter also caught the attention of major American figures.

American billionaire John Catsimatidis, a supporter of the farm and outspoken animal advocate, demanded a “thorough investigation,” even urging the U.S. Department of Justice to intervene if Canada refuses.

The farm’s story reached Catsimatidis in May when Pasitney called into his radio program pleading for help:

“The Canadian government wants our farm killed off of two tests… even though they are fully healthy and doing amazingly well.”

President Donald Trump’s administration officials, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., also became involved.

Kennedy pushed for a collaborative immunity study, writing:

“There is significant value in studying this population,” instead of the “indiscriminate” culling.

Dr. Oz even offered to relocate the entire flock to his Florida property, but the farm refused, wanting to keep the operation Canadian.

Ottawa Refused All Alternatives

Despite international proposals, scientific interest, and months of pressure, the CFIA pushed ahead.

By July, Kennedy, Oz, and Catsimatidis appealed directly to liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney for a joint public statement.

Carney never responded.

Justice Minister Sean Fraser instead praised the Supreme Court decision, saying he was “pleased to see” the case dismissed and insisting that the CFIA must “protect the health of the general Canadian public.”

Local Leaders Condemn the Raid

BC Conservative MP Scott Anderson blasted the operation as reckless:

“This operation has cost Canadians millions of dollars… and has turned the once peaceful town of Edgewood into something that looks like a science fiction movie set featuring Area 51.”

‘The People Have to Fight Back’

Pasitney says the fight is far from over:

“There has to be change in Canada.

“This cannot be allowed to continue to happen.

“The people have to fight back.”

With hundreds of carcasses removed, a devastated farm community, and national distrust rising once again, the ostrich massacre is quickly becoming another flashpoint in Canada’s ongoing struggle over transparency, accountability, and the expanding power of federal agencies operating under the banner of “public health.”

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-government-slaughters-hundreds-ostriches-bc-farm-despite-no-evidence-bird-flu/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Government Quietly Advances Plan for National Digital ID

Blogger Comment: Now around 65,000 Canadians have been “euthanized” since 2016 when the Canadian government legalised the system to provide early deaths to eliviate suffering and only a mere 9 years ago when there were zero people euthanized legally in Canada…and where these deaths now accounts as the 3rd highest statistics of Canadian deaths…an enormous number and increasing significantly by the year…but what is the reason for this huge number in a relatively small populated country of 41 million including children, as there cannot be really so many terminally ill people in Canada can there and where that specifically is why the law was brought into being in the first place…nothing else and therefore what has so sadly gone wrong with the legislation…put in place only to help people who had no hope and was to ease their suffering, but where now, many more have been included who are not terminally ill…for the rapidly expanding Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) regime, now permits euthanasia for non-terminal conditions and is slated for another major expansion in 2027?

Newly released government data has revealed a disturbing rise in euthanasia deaths across Canada, with the province of Quebec now recording the highest “assisted suicide” rate in the world.

According to the 2024–2025 Report of the Commission on End-of-Life Care, deaths under the Canadian government’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program accounted for 7.4% of all deaths in Quebec.

The figure marks an alarming 9% increase in just one year.

“The Commission notes that MAiD is in increasing demand and occupies an important place in the public sphere in Quebec,” the report states.

“The Commission rigorously and vigilantly fulfills its mandate to ensure that MAiD requirements are properly applied in Quebec and that MAiD is not chosen as a treatment option when other curative, palliative, or end-of-life care options are unavailable,” it continues.

Despite that assurance, the commission’s findings expose troubling trends.

Half of all of the individuals euthanized had said they felt like a burden to family, friends, or caregivers, while 24% cited loneliness or isolation as reasons for ending their lives.

Even more alarming, the report found that 4% of euthanasia deaths were fulfilled the same day or the next day, leaving little time for medical review or counseling.

The data reveals that the percentage of “assisted suicide” deaths involving a terminal illness is shrinking, while the number of people euthanized for poverty, depression, loneliness, or other non-permanent issues is skyrocketing.

A growing number of people are reporting that they are being pressured or “bullied” into “choosing” euthanasia over more expensive treatments.

As Slay News has previously reported, the Canadian government’s socialized healthcare system is now saving tens of millions of dollars a year by euthanizing patients instead of treating them, creating new incentives under a chilling culture of death.

Lack of Oversight and Transparency

The commission admitted that Quebec has no standardized tools or metrics to evaluate whether palliative care options are being adequately provided.

“There are no management indicators or standardized tools for assessing the quality of palliative and end-of-life care services, how well they meet the needs of patients and families, or how efficiently the system operates,” the report states.

“The Commission therefore cannot determine whether the needs of people who could benefit from such care are being met.”

Despite acknowledging these gaps, the commission stopped short of recommending any halt to euthanasia procedures, stating only:

“We cannot continue to navigate blindly on such a critical issue.”

Quebec Leads the World in Euthanasia Deaths

According to Dr. David Lussier, a geriatrician at the Montreal University Institute of Geriatrics, Quebec now has the highest number of assisted suicide requests globally.

The province has now surpassed both the Netherlands and Belgium, which have long been viewed as world leaders in euthanasia.

Quebec is also pushing to expand access even further.

The province announced plans in 2024 to begin accepting advance requests for euthanasia, allowing individuals to pre-authorize their own deaths, even though such provisions remain illegal under federal law.

One of the province’s newest palliative care centers has also drawn controversy for promoting assisted suicide to terminal and disabled patients, branding it a compassionate “choice.”

National Expansion Under Trudeau’s Liberal Government

The euthanasia surge extends far beyond Quebec.

Since former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Party government legalized assisted suicide in 2016, the number of Canadians killed by lethal injection has skyrocketed.

In 2021, Parliament expanded eligibility to include those who were not terminally ill but living with chronic conditions.

A later proposal to extend euthanasia to those suffering solely from mental illness faced intense opposition from medical, religious, and mental health groups, prompting the government to delay the measure until 2027.

To date, an estimated 65,000 Canadians have died by euthanasia since legalization, including roughly 16,000 deaths in 2023 alone, according to official figures.

Advocates warn the real total may be even higher, given growing concerns over incomplete reporting and opaque data collection.

A Nation on a Dangerous Path

Once justified as an option for the terminally ill, Canada’s euthanasia program has rapidly evolved into one of the most permissive in the world, allowing lethal injections for those suffering from loneliness, poverty, or psychological distress.

As Quebec’s numbers climb and oversight remains lacking, critics argue that what began as a “compassionate choice” has become a system of quiet elimination, targeting society’s most vulnerable under the guise of mercy.

With calls mounting for reform, many are raising concerns about how far Canada will go before the world says it has gone too far.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/canada-euthanasia-deaths-surge-record-highs-data-shows/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Man Devastated After Government Euthanizes Both Grandmothers

Blogger Comment: The European Union’s Digital Control System is nearly with us and those not in the ‘real’ know-world, think that it is for their convenience still, not realising the enormous control it will have on ‘their own money’ once fully implemented and where the EU will control all their “own” money, what you can spend it on and even stop you accessing it completely, just what has happened in Vietnam…step out of line in the EU’s control mindset and thinking will stop you buying food, buying anything really and where they could do NOTHING about it…do these people really want to live in Orwell’s world of 1984, as it is happenimg now in nations around the world where control is everything, as it is power over the people…and once it is in, there is no turning back as our political western leaders except in ‘four’ nations are now (USA, Hungary, Slovakia and Italy) controlled totally by the Davos Globalists through blackmail and financial power, and why all this is being done for their 2030 control of the western world…sounds like madness read up on the WEF on Rumble, where they have been stating this now for over 3-decades and where it appears to be nearing fruition for these elites who wish to be in the old way, masters of the universe…they are clearly mad, but with their puppet political leaders now in place, they appear to be getting there rapidly by the year as they close in on 2030…fast

Europe has taken a major step toward ending financial privacy as the globalist European Union (EU) will officially criminalize large cash payments.

Beginning January 2027, any cash transaction above €10,000 will be outlawed in the EU, making large cash purchases illegal across all 27 member states.

The move is part of the EU’s sweeping new Anti-Money Laundering (AML) package.

Unelected EU officials insist that AML targets criminals but, in practice, places ordinary citizens under full financial surveillance.

Crackdown on Cash & Bitcoin

Under the new rules:

  • Any cash payment over €10,000 becomes a criminal offense.

  • Any crypto transaction above €1,000 without approved identity verification is subject to prosecution.

Meanwhile, anonymous digital wallets, used for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, are banned entirely.

The new laws mandate that every crypto transfer must be linked to a verified digital ID.

Officials claim it’s about “security.”

Critics say it’s about control.

Digital Euro Looms: Programmable, Trackable, and Tied to Identity

The new laws are in preparation for the looming central bank digital currency (CBDC) that is due to soon launch across all EU nations.

The European Central Bank (ECB) has confirmed plans to roll out the Digital Euro by 2029.

The Digital Euro is a fully programmable currency that gives regulators unprecedented power:

  • Limits on how much you can hold

  • Restrictions on what you can buy

  • Expiration dates for digital cash

  • Real-time spending surveillance

Combine that with the EU’s increasingly centralized digital identification systems, and you get a financial architecture where a single bureaucratic decision can freeze accounts, block purchases, or silence dissent.

Global Trend

Europe’s crackdown doesn’t exist in a vacuum.

As Slay News has previously reported, governments around the world are quietly constructing the same system:

Canada is advancing a federal digital ID program under the guise of “modernizing service delivery.”

The United Kingdom, under socialist Prime Minister Keir Starmer, is reviving national digital ID plans once thought politically toxic.

In addition, Australia’s 2024 Digital ID Bill establishes a unified, government-verified identity system, which is currently being rolled out for public use.

The EU’s Digital Identity Wallet, rolling out in phases, aims to link banking access, medical data, travel permits, and online authentication under one government-issued credential.

Each digital ID initiative claims to be “voluntary.”

Yet, each one slowly becomes required to access essential services, travel, vote, or manage finances.

Once a digital ID becomes a prerequisite for banking, linking it to programmable digital cash becomes automatic.

The Blueprint: Control First, “Safety” Later

Once cash is restricted and digital IDs become mandatory, a programmable currency lets governments:

  • Disable transactions in certain industries

  • Set carbon-tracking limits and block “high-emissions” purchases

  • Shut down accounts of political dissidents

  • Impose automatic fines

  • Track every purchase in real time

  • Declare certain transactions illegal without passing new laws

A system like that doesn’t just monitor spending, it manages it.

If the model works in Europe, the rollout expands globally.

Europe Is Only the Beginning

Regulators don’t hide their intentions.

Banking lobbies across the West have repeatedly warned that cash is “inefficient,” that anonymous transactions “pose risk,” and that centralized digital currency is “inevitable.”

The EU law effectively marks the beginning of the end for private transactions.

Starting in 2027, the government will decide what “legal spending” looks like.

By 2029, the government will decide how you spend, where you spend, and if you’re allowed to spend at all.

Critics warn the real threat isn’t money laundering, it’s the quiet construction of an economic system where financial permission replaces financial freedom.

Europe is the pilot program.

The world is next.

Follow the link fir the source… https://slaynews.com/news/europe-criminalizes-large-cash-payments-ahead-digital-euro-launch/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Government Quietly Advances Plan for National Digital ID

Blogger Comment: They don’t do this is in any other western nation to safeguard their people, but they should do as these Globalist controlled corporations will do anything to camouflaging their products to make billions with the manipulation of words that most people don’t know the proper meaning of…and the possible human health risks in eating something that they were not really made aware off…they know what they are doing and it is a blessing that we have a country such as the USA understanding and protecting their people against harm.., and a pity others do not think that way like the EU and UK et al…period

A federal appeals court has ruled that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) improperly allowed certain genetically modified foods to avoid congressionally mandated labeling requirements.

The ruling overturned a key portion of the federal agency’s rules.

U.S. Circuit Judge Daniel Collins wrote that the USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) “committed legal error in concluding that, under ‘the plain language of the amended Act,’ ‘if a food does not contain detectable modified genetic material, it is not a bioengineered food.’”

In his decision, Collins said AMS “relied entirely on the flawed legal premise that the non-detectability of a substance under the regulation was equivalent to its nonpresence.”

Congress passed a 2016 law requiring the agriculture secretary to establish national labeling standards for bioengineered (genetically modified) ingredients.

AMS completed the rulemaking in 2018, and mandatory compliance began on January 1, 2022.

The rules required companies to label foods containing genetically modified ingredients as “bioengineered.”

However, AMS created exceptions for products in which genetic modifications were rendered undetectable during processing.

Citizens for GMO Labeling and several advocacy groups sued.

They are arguing that all foods containing genetically modified ingredients should be labeled, whether they’re detectable or not.

A federal district judge sided with the USDA in 2022, but the Ninth Circuit reversed that part of the ruling.

The three-judge panel found that AMS’s broad exemptions were not supported by the statute and sent that portion of the rule back to the agency for reconsideration.

The ruling noted that AMS may still craft some exclusions consistent with congressional instructions.

The USDA has not issued a comment on the litigation.

George Kimbrell, legal director for the Center for Food Safety, which represented the challengers, called the ruling “a landmark victory for the public’s right to know what they eat and feed their families.”

“We are gratified that the Court has struck down USDA’s loophole for ultra-processed GMO foods, the vast majority of which have been genetically engineered for increased pesticide tolerance,” he said.

The group noted that products such as soda and cooking oil were among those exempted under the existing rules.

The appeals court upheld AMS’s use of the term “bioengineered,” rejecting efforts by the challengers to require more commonly used terms such as “genetically modified.”

The panel also agreed that AMS improperly allowed companies to rely on digital codes, rather than on-package text, to disclose bioengineered ingredients.

It ruled that the district court should have vacated that portion of the rule and sent the matter back with instructions to do so after hearing further arguments from the parties.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/appeals-court-orders-usda-update-genetically-modified-food-labeling/

And,

READ MORE – SNAP Beneficiaries Threaten to Loot Stores Over Democrat Shutdown: ‘It Is the Taxpayer’s Job to Pay for My Kids to Eat’