Blogger Comment:The EU’s top bureacrats like their Foreign top dog Kaja Kallasare destroying the EU inside out, just like US Vice-President Vance stated to their face at a security meeting in 2025 and called it the ‘Enemy Within’…where this story revolves around due to its severity and human reach to “all Europeans” now…the outcome of course when her friends the Davos Globalists obtain total control of all Europe in 2030, now controlling all nations (including the UK) except Hungary, Slovakia and Italy (and The USA due to Trump)…
“The Baud case“
And then there is the Baud case, which has been little discussed, given that Mr. Baud’s administrative excommunication came in the midst of the Russian asset crisis.
Jacques Baud, a former Swiss army colonel and ex-strategic intelligence agent, was sanctioned by the EU on December 15, 2025. These sanctions, decided by the Council of the EU, target individuals accused of participating in Russian destabilization activities, in particular through the manipulation of information and the dissemination of propaganda in connection with the war in Ukraine—a category so vague that it can encompass almost anything and anyone.
The EU accuses Jacques Baud of acting as a “spokesperson for Russian propaganda” and spreading conspiracy theories. In particular, he is accused of claiming that Ukraine orchestrated its own invasion to facilitate its accession to NATO. According to the official text, he supported or implemented actions undermining the stability and security of Ukraine through disinformation. This wording criminalizes freedom of expression by administrative decree.
In concrete terms, the measures include freezing his assets in the EU, banning him from entering or transiting through EU territory, and prohibiting European entities from providing him with funds or doing business with him. A modern arsenal of civil elimination.
Jacques Baud vigorously contests these accusations, denies any links with Moscow, and has announced his intention to refer the matter to the Council of the EU and the Court of Justice of the European Union. As a resident of Brussels, he is particularly affected by these sanctions, which effectively expel him from society.
Switzerland, which generally aligns its sanctions with those of the EU for economic and financial measures directly related to the invasion of Ukraine, has not adopted the specific regime relating to “hybrid threats,” according to the EU’s Kafkaesque jargon. The State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) has confirmed that Switzerland does not apply sanctions targeting disinformation and propaganda, as they undermine freedom of expression, which is less negotiable in Switzerland than in Brussels.
It is important to emphasize that Mr. Baud’s civil death sentence was handed down on a purely administrative basis, without any respect for the rights of the defense.
The procedure for this type of sanction targeting ‘disinformation’ is based entirely on and requires a proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kaja Kallas, followed by adoption by the Council of the European Union (in this case, decision CFSP 2025/2572 of December 15, 2025).
Baud is civilly dead in Europe because Ms. Kaja Kallas does not like his ideas.
It should be noted that Mr. Baud is not accused of any illegal act, only of spreading ideas and opinions that Ms. Kallas finds disagreeable. This is a complete denial of the rule of law and freedom of expression, transforming politics into a court of ideas. It is France in 1793: “We do not negotiate! We kill!”
In reality, Ms. Kallas is behaving like a hysterical person in the strict Freudian sense: someone who is unable to manage her unacknowledged hatreds and expresses them in delirious outbursts.
Just six videos that shows that our western governments have never told the whole story and very little of the true story that harms us and our families…will things change, only the people can make that happen as most western nations are now captured by the Davos Globalist threat to humanity…only the USA, Hungary, Slovakia and Italy are free of THEIR harm currently…
Blogger Comment:This article is a reposted report and derives no financial benefit in doing so, but us exhibited solely to inform the public and how Big Pharma manipulate their findings to distort the actual true facts in their mission to produce massive profits and not to keep the public safe or free from vaccine harm and to keep selling their so-called vaccines to do good…but again, do NOT apparently provide this in this case and all others and research studies that have been undertaken by non-associated scientists to Big Pharma…and that’s the great difference with Big Pharma research studies, as they never compare when their sponsored/paid scientists undertake such studies…I wonder why, but you may have a plausible reason…?
.
This Article was researched and produced by a dozen leading scientists and thought leaders in aluminum toxicology and vaccine injuries, concluded that the Danish study failed to establish the safety of aluminum in vaccines. The authors of the new report called for “independent, rigorous and honest” science on the health impacts of aluminum in vaccines.
A study by Danish researchers who said they found no link between aluminum in vaccines and autism was flawed, according to a new peer-reviewed report.
The report, by a dozen leading scientists and thought leaders in aluminum toxicology and vaccine injuries, concluded that the Danish study failed to establish the safety of aluminum invaccines.
The original study, published July 15, 2025, in Annals of Internal Medicine, lacked understanding of aluminum toxicology, was poorly designed, used statistical adjustments that likely obscured aluminum’s actual impact on children’s health outcomes and failed to adequately disclose potential conflicts of interest, according to the new report.
“These limitations are sufficiently serious to invalidate the authors’ conclusions,” the report’s lead author and associate professor at École Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort, Guillemette Crépeaux, Ph.D., told The Defender.
Despite the study’s weaknesses, the Danish researchers lauded their work as evidence of vaccine safety. The day before the study was published, lead author Anders Hviid, a professor and department head of epidemiology at the Statens Serum Institut, told MedPage Today, the results “provide robust evidence supporting the safety of childhood vaccines.”
Mainstream media, including NBC News and STAT, promoted the study as proof that aluminum in vaccines is not tied to increased risk of chronic diseases in kids, including autism and asthma.
But journalist Jeremy R. Hammond, one of the authors of the new report, said:
“We are constantly told by the government, mainstream media and medical establishment that science has conclusively proven that vaccines are ‘safe and effective’ and do not contribute to the development of chronic childhood diseases and disorders, including autism.
“Yet, when looking more deeply into that body of literature … we can see that the hypothesis has never actually been tested, and how studies can be effectively designed to find no association.”
The new report, “Aluminium adjuvants and childhood health: a call for science,” was published on Dec. 25, 2025, in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology.
Authors of new report call for independent, ‘honest’ science
The Danish researchers examined national vaccination records of about 1.2 million children born in Denmark between 1997 and 2018, and tracked the rates of 50 chronic health conditions.
Using statistical analyses, the researchers concluded there was no link between aluminum content in vaccines and increased risk of developing any of the conditions.
Aluminum-containing adjuvants are used in many vaccines to create a stronger immune response in the person receiving the shot, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Vaccines containing aluminum adjuvants include DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis), hepatitis A, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), HPV and pneumococcal.
The authors of the new report that criticized the Danish study called for “independent, rigorous and honest” science on the health impacts of aluminum in vaccines.
“That such a limited and internally inconsistent study was not only published in a high-impact medical journal, but also presented as reassurance in media coverage, raises uncomfortable questions,” they wrote.
Criticism continues after journal refuses to retract study
The new report is the latest to push back against the controversial Danish study.
As soon as the study was published, critics, including Exley, began posting criticisms on the study’s webpage.
Calls for retraction grew after the Annals of Internal Medicine on July 17, 2025, uploaded corrected supplementary materials, stating that the journal’s editors had “included an incorrect version of the Supplementary Material at the time of initial publication.”
The corrected data clearly indicated a link between aluminum in vaccines and autism, according to CHD scientists who reviewed the study and the corrected data.
On Aug. 1, 2025, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. called for the article’s retraction in an op-ed published inTrial Site News. Kennedy outlined at least 10 “fatal deficiencies.”
Hviid responded with his own op-ed, which included a bullet-point list of the methodological issues Kennedy raised, but without refuting any of them.
On Aug. 11, 2025, Annals of Internal Medicine refused to retract the article.
“Since neither authors, reviewers, nor journal would rescind or retract the Danish aluminum study, a review article highlighting its flaws and false claims is prudent scientific discourse,” said Jablonowski.
‘No one who was seriously curious about harm would have designed a study this way’
The Danish study authors failed to use a control group of children who weren’t exposed to vaccine-based aluminum. Instead, they compared kids exposed to high levels of aluminum with kids exposed to a little less aluminum.
“This is an excellent way to ‘not’ find an effect,” Hooker said.
The study also never actually measured the amount of aluminum the children received. Instead, the researchers relied on manufacturer reports of how much aluminum the vaccines contained, even though published research showed inconsistency between vaccine batches.
The authors also didn’t measure the child’s body weight at the time of vaccination.
“You cannot declare a substance safe when you never measured actual exposure,” Lyons-Weiler said. “If you don’t know how much aluminum a child received, when they received it, or relative to body weight and neurodevelopmental timing, then every risk estimate that follows is numerology, not science.”
The Danish researchers also removed kids from the study who died before age 2 or received an unusually high number of vaccines. “No one who was seriously curious about harm would have designed a study this way,” Jablonowski said.
Given that the children most likely to have been harmed were removed from the study, the study authors unsurprisingly concluded that aluminum didn’t increase kids’ risk of chronic disease but rather was beneficial to kids’ health.
“So, if their findings are to be believed, injecting infants with a known neurotoxin protects them from chronic symptoms known to be associated with aluminum toxicity,” Hammond said.
However, it’s biologically implausible that aluminum would benefit kids’ health, the authors of the new report said. “These unlikely benefits seriously challenge the validity of the whole study and its conclusions.”
‘Our children need aluminum adjuvants to be removed from vaccines without delay’
The study’s statistical analyses also assumed a linear dose-response relationship, meaning that if aluminum is harmful, more aluminum would be linked to a greater prevalence of chronic disease.
Yet prior research on aluminum has shown non-linear effects, meaning very small doses can still have negative effects, the report said.
The report authors also said the Danish study authors had potential conflicts of interest that may have skewed their research. They wrote:
“Several authors are affiliated with the Statens Serum Institut, a national entity involved in vaccine production. One of the authors reported affiliations to VAC4EU, a European vaccine surveillance consortium, and funding from Novo Nordisk Fonden and Lundbeckfonden, both closely linked to Danish health policy and biomedical interests.
“The Novo Nordisk Foundation, through its wholly owned subsidiary Novo Holdings A/S, maintains a controlling interest in Novo Nordisk A/S, the largest pharmaceutical company in Denmark.”
Crépeaux, who serves as a reviewer for other journals seeking to publish research on aluminum, said she’s seeing an increase in articles that claim aluminum in vaccines is safe.
These studies overlook the fact that the toxicity of aluminum adjuvants has been “extensively documented,” she said. “Our children need aluminum adjuvants to be removed from vaccines without delay.”Related articles in The Defender
Blogger Comment:The United Nations, the WEF Davos Globalist controlled global body that is destroying humanity for the WEF elites and where most people are unaware of this and the sooner the UN is destroyed and not the western world including the United States of America the better it will be for the people and for the West’s survival, as the UN is the greatest front-man for Davos and you should not forget that for one minute…as all the dictats and orders are for the Globalist elites…and where the UN and the WHO are now a sinister organization and evil Globalist captured organization…just like the WEF’s captured western political leaders puppets where 93% are under the control of the Davos elites and Starmer in the UK…period
.
President Donald Trump’s administration has announced a sweeping restructuring of how U.S. taxpayer dollars are used in United Nations humanitarian programs, warning UN agencies they must “adapt, shrink, or die.”
The warning comes as Washington shifts funding toward efficiency, accountability, and core lifesaving missions.
The State Department said the agreement forces the UN system to consolidate operations, slash bureaucratic overhead, and address what officials described as “ideological creep” inside aid agencies, while still preserving America’s commitment to emergency relief.
“Today’s agreement ushers in a new era of UN humanitarian action and U.S. leadership in the UN system,” said Jeremy Lewin, senior official for Foreign Assistance, Humanitarian Affairs, and Religious Freedom.
“It shifts U.S. funding of UN humanitarian work onto clearly defined, accountable, efficient, and hyper-prioritized funding mechanisms to ensure that every taxpayer dollar spent on humanitarian assistance both advances American national interests and achieves the greatest possible lifesaving impact.”
Lewin said the reforms will save lives and money.
“Over President Trump’s second term, this partnership will save tens of millions of lives all around the world, while also delivering billions in efficiency-oriented savings to American taxpayers,” he added.
Centralized Fund Will Replace Hundreds of Fragmented Grants
Under the reforms, U.S. humanitarian contributions will flow into a centralized fund managed by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), rather than being dispersed across hundreds of individual agency projects.
The previous approach, the State Department said, produced overlapping programs and limited the UN’s ability to redirect resources as conditions changed.
Lewin said the restructuring will eliminate duplication and allow aid to be directed toward the most critical missions.
The United States will initially direct $2 billion to 17 priority countries, including Haiti, Syria, Ukraine, and the Congo.
That figure is lower than recent years, when U.S. contributions peaked at roughly $17 billion, but Lewin rejected claims that the move amounts to a deep cut.
“Before you dismiss it by looking at some chart, $2 billion … means millions of people are gonna get life-saving support,” Lewin said, challenging other donors to step up.
UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher said the agency will work to expand its donor base.
“We did get too reliant on the U.S. as easily our largest donor for many, many years. And it’s important we continue that work to broaden the base,” Fletcher said.
“Adapt, Shrink, or Die”
The State Department said UN agencies will be required to reduce overhead, eliminate waste, and curb ideological mission-drift, or risk losing support.
“‘Adapt or die’ is pretty strong,” Fletcher acknowledged, but said agencies are already adjusting to the administration’s emphasis on measurable outcomes.
He said the broader “Humanitarian Reset” has clarified what qualifies as lifesaving aid and stripped away layers of bureaucracy.
“If the choice is adapt or die, I choose adapt,” Fletcher said, adding that he believes the changes will ultimately save more lives.
U.S. Ambassador to the UN Mike Walz said the restructuring aligns humanitarian spending with American priorities.
“This humanitarian reset at the United Nations should deliver more aid with fewer tax dollars, providing more focused, results-driven assistance aligned with U.S foreign policy,” Walz said.
Lewin: Trump Strategy Focuses on Preventing Wars, Not Funding Their Consequences
Lewin said the shift reflects President Trump’s emphasis on diplomacy and conflict prevention rather than endless emergency spending.
“It’s incalculable the human suffering that’s prevented through the hard work of diplomacy that President Trump is doing to prevent armed conflict,” Lewin said.
He contrasted that approach with prior policy.
“Those costs have ballooned in recent years because the Biden administration sat by and let all of these wars and conflicts fester and get worse,” he said.
“And they said, you know, we’ll throw some humanitarian aid at the problem.”
Lewin argued that preventing displacement is more humane and less costly than managing permanent refugee crises.
“No one wants to be living in a [United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees] camp because they’ve been displaced by conflict,” Lewin said.
“So, the best thing that we can do to decrease costs — and President Trump recognized this, and that’s why he’s the president of peace — is by ending armed conflict.”
Over time, the administration expects all U.S. UN humanitarian funding to move through the new OCHA-directed system.
Blogger Comment:Davos Prime Minister Starmer (and Emperor of all he purveys and sees going down the drain that he is making sure that it goes the wrong in his United Kingdom for the Globalists) needs a brain check, as his destructive plan for the British people is not going fast enough to control them by 2030 for his WEF masters…but he will continue to destroy Britain as quickly as he can…as he has much to hide…these puppets now control 93% of all western nations in Europe now…and a controlled western infiltration plan by the Davos elites in capturing all or most of them over the last 25 years starting with Labour (really far-Left in disguise destroying the UK, bit-by-bit) Prime Minister Bliar in 1997…
.
The United Kingdom’s digital identity project is accelerating into what critics warn is a full-blown technocratic surveillance regime, as globalist government ministers are now privately discussing assigning digital IDs to newborn babies at birth, locking citizens into a lifetime “cradle to grave” tracking system before they can even walk.
The shocking expansion, revealed by the Daily Mail, exposes what many see as the real agenda behind the ruling socialist Labour Party’s digital identity scheme.
According to the report, the “sinister” plan is being advanced by government ministers during “secret meetings” without public input.
🚨NEWBORN BABIES TO BE GIVEN DIGITAL I.D
Ministers in the Labour Government have now let slip their latest proposal
Despite claims by leftist Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government, the plot is not about border enforcement or fraud prevention, but total population monitoring of the general public for life.
Ministers have justified the digital ID rollout as a tool to curb illegal immigration, which has run rampant in recent years due to the government’s own lax border policies.
Instead, the proposal under discussion would embed the system directly into the birth registry, pairing infants’ health records with permanent digital identifiers controlled by the state.
Critics say the plan represents one of the most aggressive assaults on privacy in modern British history.
🚨 BREAKING 🚨
Newborn babies could be given Digital ID under secretive cradle-to-grave surveillance plans.
The disturbing prospect of digital IDs for newborn babies shows this was never about right-to-work checks, immigration or “choice”.
The newborn-ID concept reportedly emerged during Cabinet Office meetings led by minister Josh Simons, who invoked Estonia’s digital governance model, where babies receive unique identifiers at birth in order to access public services.
Simons also floated the idea that digital IDs could be used to verify minors logging into social media, aligning the plan with global policy pushes such as Australia’s moves to restrict under-16s from platforms like TikTok.
Starmer, who is listed as one of the World Economic Forum’s “people,” first unveiled the digital identity agenda last September.
The globalist PM branded the plot as a workplace verification system to confirm employment eligibility.
The project is expected to cost UK taxpayers £1.8 billion ($2.4B) and roll out between 2028 and 2029.
However, government officials have refused to release full details, fueling fears of deliberate “mission creep.”
Conservative MPs and civil liberties advocates say the mask has now slipped.
Shadow Cabinet Office minister Mike Wood slammed the government’s direction, stating:
“Labour said their plan for mandatory digital ID was about tackling illegal immigration.
“But now we hear they are secretly considering forcing it on newborns.
“What do babies have to do with stopping the [illegal alien] boats?
“This would be a deeply sinister overreach by Labour – and all without any proper national debate.”
Former Conservative Cabinet minister Sir David Davis issued a stark warning, calling the proposal “creeping state surveillance.”
He added:
“The idea that we should allocate children ID at birth is frankly an affront to centuries of British history, and is being put out by stupid ministers who really don’t understand the technology they are playing with.
“They think they are being clever and modern, but a large number of people will be outraged by this.
“It will end up being hated by a lot of people.”
Davis warns that the ministers behind the scheme are “stupid” and dazzled by their own gadgets.
He further blasted Starmer’s approach as a policy sold on a “bogus premise” and expanded without parliamentary scrutiny, labeling it a “constitutional disgrace delivered in a disgraceful manner.”
Liberal Democrat spokesman Lisa Smart echoed those concerns, warning:
“Reports that ministers may be considering dragging newborn babies into their already over-reaching digital ID scheme would be a frightening development.”
Insiders present at the closed-door discussions described stunned reactions when infant enrollment was raised.
One attendee told the Daily Mail:
“The disturbing prospect of digital IDs for newborn babies shows this has nothing to do with right-to-work checks, immigration, or giving people choices.
“It’s a cradle-to-grave digital file being dishonestly forced on every single Briton.
“This is a shocking, underhand way to massively expand a controversial policy our country has always rejected.”
“You could see jaws dropping around the room,” one source reportedly told The Times.
Privacy watchdogs say the implications are vast, especially as Starmer’s broader biometric identity project grows.
The initiative, marketed as a “Brit Card” tied into the UK One Login platform, would centralize access to work, services, healthcare, benefits, banking, and potentially travel.
Opponents warn that such systems can easily evolve into economic coercion tools, where dissenters risk losing access to employment or public services with the click of a bureaucratic switch.
Big Brother Watch has been among the most outspoken critics.
🚨 BREAKING 🚨
Newborn babies could be given Digital ID under secretive cradle-to-grave surveillance plans.
The disturbing prospect of digital IDs for newborn babies shows this was never about right-to-work checks, immigration or “choice”.
The rollout is being framed as a border-security measure, but government migration figures show the vast majority of inflows occur through legal immigration pathways, not asylum evasion.
Critics say that means the real enforcement impact will fall disproportionately on domestic citizens, while doing little to stem the mass illegal immigration numbers.
A government spokesman attempted to downplay the revelations, insisting:
“The only mandatory area of the programme will be for digital right-to-work checks.
“Only people starting a new job will need to use the scheme.”
But a Whitehall source insisted that the newborn ID proposal remains “hypothetical” pending consultation, a qualifier that observers note does nothing to change the fact that the conversation is actively occurring behind closed doors.
For many Britons, the concern is not theoretical.
Digital identity systems across Europe and Canada have already expanded far beyond their initial scope, in several cases becoming gateways tied to medical care, banking, transportation, and state-administered social scoring.
Critics say the Labour supermajority-controlled UK is moving down the same path, only faster, and with less transparency.
This is not a policy course correction; it is a fundamental restructuring of the relationship between citizen and state.
The British people now face a crossroads:
A future of anonymous private life or permanent biometric tagging beginning at birth.
Unfortunately for the taxpaying public, the globalist government isn’t giving them a say in the matter.
Blogger Comment:Canada and PM Carney (a former DAVOS WEF senior executive) are driving further with helping their people find easy evil ways to kill themselves legally and the government are basically insane with their WEF driven depopulation agenda that accelerates ever further than their insane situation now where over 23,000 Canadians died last year through the Government’s euthanasia programme of making vast numbers of Canadians die and where most are NOT terminally ill, that accounts as the 3rd highest killer of the people of Canada…yes mad and also genocidal in dimension now where no other country in the western world or the world has such high numbers of “non-normal deaths” per capita…nowhere…but it is the Davos Globalists depopulation agenda of course that Carney and Canada are taking orders from…insanely true unfortunately…and extremely sinisterfor humanity’s future if it has any…
.
The New York Times is demanding that the Canadian government advances it’s rapid expansion of “assisted suicide” laws in order to swiftly euthanize a woman suffering from mental health issues.
It comes as Canada’s spiraling assisted-suicide program is once again under international fire after the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities called on the Canadian government to repeal its planned expansion of euthanasia for those suffering solely from mental illness, a policy critics warn will normalize suicide as “healthcare.”
On March 21, the UN committee published a report urging Canada to repeal “Track 2 MAiD” and halt the scheduled 2027 expansion of assisted death eligibility.
Committee Vice-Chair Rosemary Kayess issued a chilling rebuke, calling Canada’s euthanasia regime a “step back into state-sponsored eugenics.”
Yet just days later, the New York Times ran a nearly 4,000-word feature romanticizing the expansion by presenting the case of 48-year-old comedian Claire Brosseau in a piece titled:
“Claire Brosseau Wants to Die. Will Canada Let Her?”
The framing was unmistakable, and the article bluntly argued that a mentally ill woman with suicidal thoughts now wants the government to affirm, approve, and fund her death.
According to the Times, Brosseau, who describes herself as “deeply loved” and having lived a life full of “riches,” suffers from “debilitating mental illness” and has attempted suicide several times.
When Canada first moved to legalize euthanasia for mental illness, she said she “felt a small, tentative, tendril of relief” that she “could die in a way that did not involve pain or violence, or horror for the people who love her.”
If successful, Brosseau will be euthanized with a doctor-administered lethal injection under Canada’s socialized healthcare system.
The Times downplayed the documented agony endured by families who lose loved ones to assisted suicide, instead echoing the rhetoric of Canada’s powerful euthanasia lobby, Dying with Dignity, portraying Brosseau as an “inadvertent player” in the political fight.
Brosseau is physically healthy, and the Times noted she could live “for decades.”
She has undergone dozens of rounds of treatment for multiple psychiatric diagnoses, including manic depression and chronic suicidal ideation.
She originally planned to apply for euthanasia on March 17, 2023, when eligibility for mental-illness MAiD was first scheduled to begin, before the government postponed the expansion amid intense public backlash and a flood of disturbing euthanasia cases.
Reporter Stephanie Nolen followed Brosseau closely for the feature, documenting that her own psychiatrists cannot even agree on whether she should be approved to die.
University of Toronto psychiatrist Dr. Robinson argued her wish for death is a legitimate choice, even while admitting:
“I would love to change her mind.”
He claimed that refusing assisted suicide would amount to discrimination based on her chronic mental-health condition.
Her other psychiatrist, Dr. Mark Fefergrad, strongly disagrees.
He warned that mental illness is inherently unpredictable, meaning so-called “irremediable suffering” cannot be meaningfully determined.
“I believe she can get well,” Fefergrad said.
Using the common Canadian acronym for medical assistance in dying, he added, “I don’t think MAID is the best or only choice for her.”
Fefergrad said he has watched patients improve in ways no clinician could have anticipated.
“People get better in ways we don’t expect — and surprising, unexpected things happen every day,” he said.
“That doesn’t really happen with a big brain cancer.”
He described a former patient who would likely have qualified for assisted suicide, until an unexpected relationship transformed their life.
Fefergrad also warned of future medical breakthroughs:
“What if Ms. Brosseau chose to die, and then a new drug or procedure was developed that might have been transformative for her.
“That weighs on me as a philosophical question.”
The divide has shaken Canada’s psychiatric community, where many experts oppose MAiD for mental illness and warn that legalizing it will push vulnerable patients toward an irreversible decision at their lowest moments.
The Times report recounts Brosseau’s chaotic history in show business, substance abuse, promiscuity, trauma, and severe depressive episodes, alongside deep distrust of the psychiatric system after a violent hospitalization incident she has refused to process.
Now, Brosseau has withdrawn from loved ones and says:
“I’m not a person. I can’t be in the world.”
Her family still loves her through episodes; none of them wants her to die, but as Nolen noted, they have become worn down by the emotional strain and limited support resources.
To Canada’s euthanasia movement, that reality is treated as justification, rather than an indictment of a broken mental-health system.
Dying with Dignity has reportedly taken Brosseau’s case to court.
If the expansion moves forward, critics warn the floodgates will open — giving suicidal Canadians fast-tracked access to a “solution” from which there is no return.
The Times concludes by directing readers to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline — an ironic coda to a story centered on legalizing suicide for the suicidal.
During the debate overBill C-218, Conservative MP and suicide survivor Andrew Lawton issued a stark warning to Parliament, citing psychiatrist Dr. John Maher:
“Dr. John Maher testified before Parliament that seven percent of those who attempt suicide die by suicide.
“That means that 93 percent of people who, at one or multiple points, want to end their life eventually get over that.
“The success rate of MAiD is 100 percent.
“By design, this is a policy that will give up on people…
“These are real people.
“There are faces to this. If Bill C-218 does not pass, people will die.”
For critics, including the UN’s disability-rights watchdog, Canada’s euthanasia experiment is no longer about compassion or dignity.
It is about a government that has made suicide easier than treatment, and is now preparing to extend that pathway to those who need help the most.
A federal judge today ruled that a coalition of major medical organizations, including the AAP, can proceed with a lawsuit against U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Children’s Health Defense General Counsel Kim Mack Rosenberg said the ruling fails to account for the medical groups’ conflicts of interest.
Blogger Comment:It has to be stated that organisations like AAP are in reality, a trade organizations representing the vaccine industry et al and are not really independent organizations representing the health of children etc, but Big Business and Big Profits where that is where these so-called medical institutions have so badly gone wrong over recent decades and you must always ‘FOLLOW THE MONEY’. to find out and know whether institutions are compromised, as if you do this and undertake your own ‘independent’ research (not just taking the brainwashing word of ‘legacy’ MSM who are totally controlled by the Globalists for their own control interests, not yours, MOST HAVE…the following is an article by The Defender and by the Defender Staff who are always looking out for the health of children and where this article is printed free of charge and not for any monetary remuneration whatsoever that blurs all scientific and media articles these days 100% for the status quo and big money…Remember Covid-19 and how many of our reverred medical instirtutions toild the people about the dire effects of the injections…NONE… and that should make you really think ?
A federal judge today ruled that a coalition of major medical organizations can move forward with a lawsuit challenging vaccine policy changes under U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Judge Brian Murphy of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts rejected the government’s bid to dismiss the case. Murphy ruled that the plaintiffs — which include the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) — have legal standing to sue.
Murphy dismissed the government’s argument that the groups could not show that the new policies would cause them direct harm. The decision opens the door to legal scrutiny of recent actions taken by federal vaccine officials under Kennedy’s leadership.
The medical organizations want the court to invalidate all ACIP votes cast since June, when Kennedy dismissed 17 sitting members and replaced them with new appointees that he handpicked.
“Plaintiffs allege that these appointments skewed the composition of ACIP in favor of COVID-vaccine and/or mRNA-vaccine deniers in order to comport with Secretary Kennedy’s personal views,” Murphy wrote.
The groups said they believe Kennedy’s overhaul of ACIP violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which requires advisory panels to be “fairly balanced” and operate in an “open, independent” manner.
Murphy ruled that the plaintiffs have plausibly alleged that ACIP’s current makeup violates the requirements of the act, and that their claims are strong enough to survive the government’s motion to dismiss.
Ruling ‘reflects misperceptions about vaccines and children’s health’
Kim Mack Rosenberg, general counsel for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), said the court’s standing analysis rested on flawed assumptions about pediatric care and the role of major medical organizations.
“While I am somewhat surprised that the court found that plaintiffs have standing to sue here,” the ruling “reflects misperceptions about vaccines and children’s health generally,” Mack Rosenberg said.
She said Murphy’s decision fails to account for what she described as the professional and financial interests of the medical groups. The decision “does not reflect the reality that the American Academy of Pediatrics and other organizations are in many respects trade organizations for their professions — primarily protecting the interests of their members, not children.”
She cited language in Murphy’s order about alleged economic harms to pediatricians, calling it revealing.
“It is telling that one of the alleged financial injuries to doctors discussed in the judge’s order is that pediatricians will have to spend more time discussing vaccines with families and thus will not be able to see as many patients each day,” Mack Rosenberg said.
“In other words, doctors may have to have discussions with patients so that families can have informed consent.”
Mack Rosenberg said the court’s reasoning “tacitly admits that, in many pediatric practices, currently those discussions are not taking place in a meaningful way and families are not having their concerns addressed.”
Policy shifts will result in ‘deaths among pregnant women, unborn children, and all children,’ groups allege
Since taking office, he has moved to overhaul vaccine decision-making structures, drawing fierce opposition from entrenched medical organizations.
In May 2025, Kennedy directed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to remove its recommendation for COVID-19 shots for all children ages 6 months and older from the agency’s immunization schedules, and instead use “shared clinical decision-making” between parents and providers.
The following month, Kennedy fired the entire ACIP panel and later appointed new members whom critics describe as more skeptical of mass vaccination policies.
In September 2025, the reconstituted committee voted to recommend COVID-19 vaccines for all ages only through “individual decision-making” between patients and healthcare providers, rather than broad population-wide guidance.
The CDC adopted that recommendation in October 2025 for both pediatric and adult patients, effectively ending its previous blanket endorsement of COVID-19 vaccination.
The AAP and several other organizations first sued Kennedy in July 2025, claiming the committee revised the COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for children based on insufficient evidence.
The groups also criticized COVID-19 vaccine changes for pregnant women in their lawsuit, though no changes had been made to the immunization schedule for pregnant women.
The groups’ 42-page complaint describes the changes as “baseless and uninformed” and alleges they place pregnant women and children at “grave and immediate risk.”
The lawsuit also claims the policy shifts will result in “decreased rates of vaccination, increased rates of transmission, long-lasting illness, and ultimately deaths among pregnant women, unborn children, and all children.”
Kennedy has sparked ‘fear’ in families, AAP president said
In November 2025, the groups filed an expanded complaint seeking to disband ACIP entirely and overturn all recommendations made since June, including a December 2025 vote to remove the long-standing guideline that all newborns receive a hepatitis B vaccine.
They are also seeking to rebuild the committee under court supervision — a step with no clear precedent in federal law.
“Pediatricians have seen firsthand the harm created by the disruptive and politicized decisions to overturn decades of evidence-based federal guidance on immunizations,” AAP President Susan J. Kressly said in a November statement. “These changes have caused fear, decreased vaccine confidence, and barriers for families to access vaccines.”
Kressly argued that the consequences are already unfolding, saying children are suffering “avoidable illnesses and hospitalizations” as federal vaccine processes are disrupted.
Plaintiffs’ lawyer has strong ties to Big Pharma
Richard H. Hughes IV, lead counsel for the plaintiffs, told MedPage Today in November 2025 that ACIP “shouldn’t be making policy” in its current form and said the groups want the panel dissolved and rebuilt.
Hughes served as Moderna’s vice president of public policy from 2020 to 2022, during the rollout of the company’s COVID-19 vaccine, Spikevax. Before that, he worked for Merck.
Critics cite those ties as evidence that the lawsuit is aimed at preserving a pharmaceutical-friendly status quo.
Plaintiffs in the case include the AAP, the American College of Physicians, the American Public Health Association, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Massachusetts Public Health Association, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and a pregnant physician identified as “Jane Doe,” who claims she faces “barriers to access to the vaccine.”
Other defendants named in the lawsuit include HHS, the CDC and its acting director Matthew Buzzelli, National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya and U.S. Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary.
Update: This article has been updated to correct U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy’s name.
Blogger Comment:We with our ear to the ground knew that Hunter Biden was a corrupt operative where even former CBS investigative journalists are turning whistleblowers that their Excaacutive covered up for the Bidens, as Hunter had one of the best teachers in the world on the subject of corruptive practices, his father Joe the US President who studies the subject in depth for 53-years (and even before that in politics before becoming a Senator) in the corruptive school of Washington DC…no better CV really and the best university of its kind in the world…
.
Investigative journalist Catherine Herridge has blown the whistle to reveal that CBS executives actively blocked coverage of the Hunter Biden “laptop from hell” scandal, despite the story being ready to publish well before the 2022 midterms.
Herridge, a longtime national security and investigative reporter who previously served as Fox News’s chief intelligence correspondent, joined CBS in 2019 as a senior investigative correspondent.
She was fired in 2024 after probing the Hunter Biden laptop case.
The backstory of the infamous laptop dates back to April 2019.
At the time, Hunter Bide, reportedly intoxicated, arrived at the Delaware computer repair shop run by John Paul Mac Isaac with three damaged MacBook Pro laptops.
One device was destroyed beyond repair and returned to Hunter.
A second laptop required a keyboard that Mac Isaac loaned to him, a keyboard that was never returned.
The third laptop Hunter left behind for repair.
Hunter Biden never came back to retrieve it.
After repeated unsuccessful attempts to contact him, Mac Isaac lawfully took ownership of the abandoned device under his shop’s policy.
In October 2020, The New York Post published emails from the laptop.
The “October surprise” revealed evidence that Hunter Biden conducted foreign business dealings and acted as a financial conduit for Joe Biden as part of an international influence-peddling operation.
Herridge says CBS executives delayed reporting the story, despite the fact that her investigation was complete ahead of the midterms.
“When we did the story, we did it after the [2022] midterms,” Herridge said.
“I argued against that because it was ready before the midterms, and my training is that you should always do the story when it’s ready to go.
“You should not be dictated by the political cycle.”
According to Herridge, CBS finally aired the laptop story two years after the scandal was already public.
However, executives still moved to shut down further coverage, including a separate story involving Joe Biden.
Herridge says executives and producers even overrode CBS CEO George Cheeks when it came to blocking follow-up reporting.
Blogger Comment:Zelensky is one of the world’s greatest con men and where he is a Globalist stooge ‘First-Class’ put there on the world stage by these Davos people who made Ukraine the first WEF controlled nation implicitly prior to the Covid-19 pandemic where few people seem to know…but where Trump and Putin has something very much in common with each other being bossom cousins in beiung WEF threats to their global plans for humanity, so better together than apart for the future of humankind as they say, but I would say mainly on the latter person if the Globalists ever tell the truth even when they are lying which they do continually…
Russian President Vladimir Putin has accused Ukraine of attacking his official residence in Russia during targeted strikes.
Putin told President Donald Trump during a phone call on Monday that Ukraine allegedly attempted a drone strike on one of his official residences.
The call was the two leaders’ second conversation in as many days.
However, the claim was immediately denied by Ukrainian officials as false and politically motivated.
According to a Kremlin readout, Putin said Moscow would “adjust” its negotiating posture in response to the reported incident.
The statement signals that Russia may be preparing to take a harder line in ongoing discussions over a potential U.S.- and Ukraine-backed peace framework that has been under quiet negotiation for weeks.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov claimed Russian air defenses intercepted 91 long-range drones.
The drone was allegedly headed toward the Dolgiye Borody presidential residence in Russia’s Novgorod region.
The property is located between Moscow and St. Petersburg.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky rejected the allegation outright, however.
Zelensky is accusing Moscow of manufacturing a false flag narrative to justify further strikes.
In a post on X, Zelensky wrote:
“This alleged ‘residence strike’ story is a complete fabrication intended to justify additional attacks against Ukraine, including Kyiv, as well as Russia’s own refusal to take necessary steps to end the war.
“Typical Russian lies.
“Furthermore, the Russians have already targeted Kyiv in the past, including the Cabinet of Ministers building.”
“Ukraine does not take steps that can undermine diplomacy,” he continued.
“To the contrary, Russia always takes such steps.
“This is one of many differences between us.”
Reuters reported that Lavrov warned Moscow would retaliate over what he described as an attempted strike on Putin’s home in northern Russia.
The exchange comes as Trump and Putin are expected to meet in Alaska for direct discussions.
The engagement is seen as central to Washington’s effort to secure negotiated de-escalation after months of stalled diplomatic movement.
The competing claims highlight the deep distrust now shaping the conflict, even as U.S. officials continue to push for a diplomatic resolution.
Instead of signaling openness to compromise, Moscow’s statements suggest it may be preparing to move in the opposite direction by using the alleged incident to justify a tougher negotiating stance and potential escalation.
Blogger Comment:The Globalist reach knows no bounds and their Democrat darlings and puppets just take orders from their masters in Davos…never take Disney on face value anymore, as they defioniytely are not worth your trust when you realise what they are into…
.
The U.S. Department of Justice has announced that a federal court has approved a stipulated order resolving allegations that Disney Worldwide Services Inc. and Disney Entertainment Operations LLC violated federal children’s online privacy laws.
According to the Justice Department press release, the government alleged that Disney violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and its implementing regulations.
COPPA prohibits operators of websites or online services from knowingly collecting, using, or disclosing personal information from children under 13 without notifying parents and obtaining verifiable parental consent.
The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, alleged that Disney failed to properly designate certain YouTube video content as being directed toward children.
This failure allegedly resulted in advertisements being targeted to child viewers on the platform.
As a result of that failure, Disney and third parties acting on its behalf collected personal information from children without the required parental notice or consent, in what the government said was a direct violation of COPPA.
The Justice Department release also emphasized the scale of Disney’s YouTube presence, noting that its content has accumulated billions of views in the United States.
Officials argued that the scope of that audience heightened the potential privacy impact because the content in question includes videos appealing to children, such as programming featuring Disney characters, animation, and family-oriented entertainment.
The case represents a COPPA enforcement action administered by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
The FTC has pursued similar actions against other companies over improper data collection involving minors on digital platforms.
Under the stipulated order approved by the court, Disney agreed to pay a $10 million civil penalty to the United States.
The agreement resolves the allegations without an admission of liability by the company.
The order also imposes injunctive relief intended to prevent future violations, prohibiting Disney from operating on YouTube in any manner that contravenes COPPA requirements.
In addition, Disney must implement a comprehensive compliance program to ensure continued adherence to the law, including internal policies, employee training, audits, and procedures for properly identifying and labeling child-directed content.
In a statement, Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate of the Justice Department’s Civil Division said:
“The Justice Department is firmly devoted to ensuring parents have a say in how their children’s information is collected and used.
“The Department will take swift action to root out any unlawful infringement on parents’ rights to protect their children’s privacy.”
The settlement resolves the case without trial and does not include findings of fact beyond the allegations contained in the complaint.
Disney did not issue a public statement quoted in the DOJ press release regarding the settlement or the allegations.
World Freedom 