World Freedom

In a groundbreaking international study, a team of researchers has confirmed that mRNA “vaccines” triggered waves of excess deaths in all nations with high Covid “vaccination” rates.

The study analyzed the official data for 21 countries and confirmed that they all suffered surging excess deaths in 2022.

Alarmingly, many of those countries have not recovered and have seen excess deaths remain persistent or even worsen since then.

The study was led by Dr. Chryso Th. Pallari from the C-MOR Consortium in Cyprus.

The research was conducted in collaboration with universities in Cyprus, Australia, and Europe.

The results of the study were published in the International Journal of Epidemiology.

Following the study, the researchers are sounding the alarm after revealing alarming data about excess mortality following the mass Covid vaccination campaigns of 2022 analyzed mortality trends in 21 countries and concluded that higher vaccination rates correlated with an increase in excess deaths during 2022.

The study’s findings are deeply troubling, suggesting that the pandemic control measures and vaccine campaigns did more harm than good in some countries.

The researchers argue that “vaccines” and government control measures correlate with lower Covid death rates in 2022.

However, while deaths linked to Covid fell, all-cause mortality rates continued to climb dramatically.

According to the research, excess mortalities, deaths above the normal rate, were higher in 2022 than in both 2020 and 2021, the pandemic’s peak year.

Disturbingly, however, the surge in excess deaths began only after the “vaccines” were introduced, not before.

The data suggests a clear connection between mRNA injections and the rising number of non-COVID-19-related deaths, including cardiac events, strokes, and fatal cancers.

These findings cast serious doubts on the long-term safety of Covid “vaccines” and their potential unintended consequences on public health.

The study used age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) and compared national mortality data against a pre-pandemic baseline (2015–2019).

What they uncovered is significant.

The scientists confirmed that all 21 countries involved in the study experienced statistically significant excess deaths in 2022, a year after mass vaccination began.

While the study considered COVID-19 incidence rates, the most striking correlation was found with non-Covid deaths.

The findings suggest that the “vaccination” campaigns may have caused more harm than good.

Cardiac arrest, strokes, and cancers were the primary causes of these unexpected deaths.

The study adds to the growing body of evidence linking all-cause mortality surges to the widespread use of mRNA injections.

The countries hardest hit by excess mortality were the U.S., Georgia, and Estonia, where the death toll in 2022 outpaced the tragic losses of 2020, the peak year of the pandemic.

Strikingly, most of these excess deaths were not directly related to COVID-19, confirming concerns about the health toll of the mass vaccination strategy.

The study also highlights the fact that the non-Covid deaths, which include heart conditions, strokes, and even cancer-related deaths, were not adequately explained by COVID-19 incidence.

Instead, the cause of these all-cause mortality spikes points to the vaccines as the most likely contributing factor.

The most alarming aspect of the study is the persistent and sustained increase in excess mortality linked to mRNA vaccines throughout 2022.

The correlation between mRNA vaccinations and excess deaths is striking, and the non-Covid-related nature of most excess deaths raises urgent questions about the collateral damage caused by the global vaccination campaign.

As global authorities, including the World Health Organization (WHO), continue to push for higher vaccination rates in the face of new variants and ongoing vaccine efforts, the data from this study provides a stark warning that mRNA shots are contributing to rising mortality in ways that need to be urgently addressed.

This study sheds light on an issue that leading independent experts have long warned about: vaccination safety.

The fact that a larger-than-expected number of deaths occurred following mass vaccination must be examined thoroughly by health authorities.

The global push for vaccines may have unintended consequences that we can no longer ignore.

Given the growing number of non-Covid-related deaths, it is vital for public health organizations and governments to launch in-depth investigations into the long-term effects of mRNA “vaccines” on various populations.

These findings should serve as a call to action for both governments and the medical community to reassess “vaccine” safety and consider the potential risks before pushing for further mandates.

This research highlights the urgent need for transparency and accountability in mass vaccination policies.

The increasing evidence of excess deaths tied to mRNA “vaccines” should prompt a reevaluation of the global vaccination campaign and lead to revised guidelines that prioritize patient safety over corporate profits and globalist agendas.

The public health establishment, alongside media outlets and government agencies, must now confront the evidence and acknowledge that the true impact of the Covid mRNA injection rollout on global mortality rates may be far more significant than anyone had previously imagined.

The time for accountability is now.

Follow the link for the article… https://slaynews.com/news/major-study-confirms-covid-vaccines-triggered-excess-death-surge-21-countries/

And,

READ MORE – Scientists Sound Alarm Over ‘Magnetic Nanoparticles’ in Covid ‘Vaccines’

Blogger Comment: Gates is definitely mad and insane, as his own former vaccine adviser has told him that his mRNA injections (so-called vaccines) where he has invested US$10,000 million and expects a 20-fold return US$200,000 million (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YG-8nEQF5zs)…KILLs PEOPLE, but he still wants to kill more (listen to his video speech over deceased funding)…the man is a psychopath and probably the greatest mass murderer of all time and 45-times greater than the Spanish Flu that took 100 million human lives.

Billionaire Bill Gates has accused President Donald Trump’s administration of putting his global “vaccination” agenda “at risk” by cutting off taxpayer funding for his organization GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance.

In a dramatic move that has sent shockwaves through the global vaccination network, Trump’s Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced last month that the United States will halt funding to GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance.

The Trump administration pulled funding from the Gates-founded organization due to mounting concerns over “vaccine” safety.

GAVI announced that it had lost U.S. taxpayer funding during a fundraising event on June 25.

During the event, GAVI shared a video of Kennedy confirming that GAVI had lost funding.

In the video, RFK Jr. stated that the U.S. would be cutting over a billion dollars in future aid.

He continued by criticizing the organization for neglecting to address critical “vaccine” safety issues.

“When vaccine safety issues have come before GAVI, GAVI has treated them not as a patient health problem, but as a public relations problem,” Kennedy said.

The announcement came amid growing scrutiny of GAVI’s role in pushing “vaccines” on developing nations while reaping immense financial benefits.

At the same event, Bill Gates took the stage, lamenting the $30 billion loss in aid caused by the U.S. funding cuts.

With a carefully curated performance aimed at appealing to donors, Gates claimed that “All the progress we’ve made is at risk.”

Gates spoke of “agonizing” situations he claims are now faced by mothers around the world whose children were allegedly unable to access life-saving “vaccines” due to funding cuts.

WATCH: Click on the following link for Gates’s whining words to try and save the conman’s 20-fold return on his investment and what in all TRUTH he is bothered about, not your Health… period… Bill Gates Complains Trump Has Put His Global ‘Vaccine’ Agenda ‘at Risk’

But what Gates failed to acknowledge was the mounting evidence that his “vaccines” are not only ineffective but harmful to children, raising questions about his true motivations.

Gates, who has long profited from vaccine investments, has been promoting a narrative of philanthropic altruism, claiming that GAVI has made vaccines more affordable and accessible.

However, critics argue that the real “progress” Gates refers to is not the health of children, but his personal wealth.

Kennedy’s decision to cut funding comes amid growing concerns over the unregulated and dangerous nature of “vaccine” mandates and the push for universal “vaccination.”

Critics, especially those in the anti-globalist and medical freedom communities, point out the huge profit margins Gates and his corporate allies make from pushing these products onto the most vulnerable populations in the world.

Kennedy, whose stance on vaccine safety has earned him fierce opposition from the medical establishment, criticized GAVI’s business model.

RFK Jr. warns that GAVI and Gates are driven by profit rather than genuine public health.

Gates has touted an extraordinary 20-to-1 return on “vaccine” investments, meaning for every $1 billion invested, there’s an expected $20 billion return in “economic benefits.”

The Microsoft co-founder claims GAVI has “saved over 19 million lives” and “vaccinated over a billion children” over 25 years.

But what Gates doesn’t mention is the millions of children who have been injured by these injections.

Studies have documented harmful side effects, including autism, severe allergic reactions, and even death, something Gates and his partners are failing to address.

Kennedy’s push for transparency and accountability is now taking on greater significance as more families speak out about the harm caused by “gender-affirming care” and experimental “vaccine” trials.

He is not only questioning the safety of childhood shots but also challenging the entire “vaccine” industrial complex.

Gates, who owns a massive stake in the vaccine industry, has profited immensely as a result of these global vaccine campaigns.

While Gates portrays himself as a philanthropist, the reality is that his mass-vaccination schemes have been highly profitable for him and his investors.

The data reveals a troubling pattern as Gates continues to profit off children’s sickness while posing as a benefactor of their well-being.

At the same GAVI event, Gates boasted that GAVI had “saved lives” by making “vaccines” affordable.

However, critics argue the organization’s real purpose is to create dependency on Big Pharma and turn a profit from the global health crisis.

Gates has direct financial stakes in Pfizer, BioNTech, and other major vaccine manufacturers.

He was one of the earliest investors in BioNTech, which later partnered with Pfizer for the Covid mRNA injections.

As Kennedy pointed out in a recent speech, Gates had the foresight to buy over a million shares in BioNTech before the pandemic began, then sold those shares at a massive profit when the stock price skyrocketed.

The GAVI funding cuts are a welcome step toward pushing back against the corporate capture of global health policy.

Gates and his allies continue to leverage the pandemic to drive a global health agenda that lines their pockets while undermining the health and safety of millions of children worldwide.

Gates’ claims that GAVI has generated $250 billion in economic benefits in countries it supports are not backed by verifiable evidence.

This claim, like so many others, is rooted in corporate-speak and misleading narratives designed to silence critics and continue the cycle of profit-making through mass vaccination programs.

The underlying agenda of figures like Gates is the consolidation of global corporate power under the guise of public health.

By pushing for global vaccination programs and leveraging international organizations like GAVI, they have created a powerful network that profits from the health crises they’ve helped create.

Kennedy’s bold stand against GAVI funding cuts is a critical moment in the fight against the global health agenda.

The Trump administration has shown that it’s willing to challenge these systems, but there’s still much work to be done.

As Gates continues to profit from children’s sickness, it’s time for the globalist machine to be held accountable for its actions.

GAVI, Gates, and the global vaccination cartel must be stopped before they further harm innocent lives for corporate gain.

Kennedy’s call for transparency and accountability is a rallying cry for those who want to see a healthier, more transparent world, not one dominated by corporate profits at the expense of the people.

Follow the link for the sirce of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/bill-gates-complains-trump-put-global-vaccine-agenda-at-risk/

And,

READ MORE – WEF & Gates-Funded Scientists Develop Mutant ‘Bird Flu’ That Rapidly Spreads in Humans with 100% Kill Rate

A groundbreaking new analysis has emerged, challenging the mainstream narrative on “global warming” and throwing a wrench in the radical climate agenda.

According to researchers from the University of Exeter, the biggest factor driving global warming since 2001 isn’t the rise in carbon dioxide (CO2) levels, but rather a reduction in sulfur dioxide (SO2) pollution.

The revelation has major implications for the “global warming” debate and for the “environmental” policies that push for costly regulations and collectivist government control.

The researchers found that the decline in SO2 emissions, which have been linked to industrial and maritime pollution, has resulted in darker clouds, causing less solar radiation to be reflected into space.

This means that the Earth is absorbing more heat, leading to “global warming.”

The study, presented at the UK’s Exeter Climate Conference, raises questions about the narrative that CO2 is the primary driver of “climate change” and suggests that a reduction in pollution, rather than an increase in CO2, is behind the warming trend.

The researchers’ analysis of CERES data from 2001 to 2019 reveals a stark correlation between the reduction in sulfur dioxide and a decline in the Earth’s albedo, the planet’s ability to reflect sunlight back into space.

The findings suggest that, contrary to popular belief, less pollution is what’s really driving global warming.

As Professor Peter Cox, a leading climate scientist at Exeter University, put it:

“Two-thirds of the global warming since 2001 is SO2 reduction rather than CO2 increases.”

For years, the globalist climate agenda has hinged on the idea that CO2 emissions are responsible for heating the planet, leading to sweeping policies like the Paris Agreement and carbon taxes that cripple industries and harm everyday consumers.

But this new data puts that theory into serious doubt, exposing the flawed logic behind many climate change policies.

The study emphasizes that sulfate pollution, mostly from industrial emissions and ship exhaust, actually increases cloud brightness, making the clouds more reflective.

These clouds can act as a shield against solar radiation, cooling the Earth.

The reduction in sulfate pollution, largely due to moves away from high-sulfur fuels like coal, has caused clouds to darken, reducing their ability to reflect sunlight.

In essence, we’re seeing a climate shift caused by environmental regulations and policy decisions, not CO2 emissions.

The global push to cut pollution has had unintended consequences, leading to warmer temperatures.

This new information is catastrophic for the globalist “climate change” lobby that has been pushing for massive government intervention based on CO2.

The idea that the real cause of warming might be a decrease in air pollution, not an increase in CO2, is a huge blow to the narrative that the world is on the brink of disaster unless we embrace extreme climate policies.

We are now faced with the uncomfortable truth that decades of climate hysteria, driven by government-backed environmental groups, have been based on incomplete or misleading science.

What does it mean for the Green New Deal, for global carbon taxes, and for the radical policies that push for socialist-style regulation of industries and energy?

Will policymakers finally have the courage to reconsider their climate mandates in light of this new research?

The findings are raising serious doubts about the true motives behind the global push for climate action.

Many believe that the climate crisis narrative is being used as a front to push for a radical socialist agenda that would give governments unchecked power to control the economy.

The drastic measures demanded by environmental groups, like the abolition of fossil fuels and the implementation of massive government subsidies for “green” industries, are not just about saving the planet but about creating big government control.

Is the reduction in pollution really driving “climate change?”

Or is this just another reason to demand more centralized control over global industries, energy, and personal freedom?

As more research surfaces, the case for transparency and honesty in climate science becomes more urgent.

This new data calls for a rethink of the entire climate policy framework.

Perhaps, just perhaps, the global elites have been pushing an agenda that has less to do with saving the planet and more to do with pushing globalism and socialism.

The facts are clear: The real culprit behind any changes in Earth’s temperature may not be the carbon footprint but the decrease in certain pollutants, a discovery that could reshape the entire climate debate.

Let’s hope the truth is finally given the spotlight it deserves, and the push for globalist climate policies is reevaluated with the new evidence in mind.

Folow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/study-most-global-warming-caused-reduction-pollution/

And,

READ MORE – Greta Thunberg Insider Blows Whistle: ‘Climate Change’ Is a ‘Scam’

Blogger’s Comment: The following i being put forward around the world to prohibite mRNA injections…only ‘evil’ western dovernments introduce and make their people take these ‘killer’ so-called vaccines…

I Am Going To War! Will You Join Me? 50 Different State Versions of the ‘Sansone mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act’” – https://josephsansone.substack.com/p/i-am-going-to-war-will-you-join-me?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

“Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and United Kingdom versions of the ‘Sansone mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act’” – https://josephsansone.substack.com/p/canada-australia-new-zealand-and?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

An explosive new alert has emerged from Singapore as the nation’s skyrocketing excess death rate has continued surging among those who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The chilling data has raised serious questions about the true toll of the aggressive global Covid “vaccination” campaign.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states that “excess deaths” are the number of deaths above what would be expected based on historical trends.

According to bombshell data from the Human Mortality Database (HMD) and peer-reviewed studies, the country experienced a sharp and sustained rise in excess deaths immediately following the rollout of Covid “vaccines.”

The spike is an ominous signal that the vaccines may have played a significant role in the surge of mortality.

The data paints a disturbing picture of a country that, despite being one of the most vaccinated in the world, is facing unprecedented levels of death.

In March 2022, excess mortality in Singapore spiked to an astonishing 49.9% above expected deaths.

The broader period between February and April 2022 saw an average of 24.0% higher deaths than usual.

Alarmingly, however, this wasn’t a temporary uptick.

Excess deaths have continued surging long after the pandemic.

As of December 2024, the most recent data reveals that excess deaths in Singapore have stabilized at approximately 25-30% above the historical baseline.

The data suggests that this elevated mortality rate has become the new normal for the fully vaccinated nation.

Despite these chilling statistics, Singapore’s Ministry of Health (MOH) refuses to face the truth.

Acknowledging the excess deaths between January 2020 and June 2022, the MOH downplayed the situation by attributing the deaths to Covid itself or “underlying medical conditions worsened by COVID‑19 infections.”

However, the MOH fails to answer the critical question of why excess deaths only soared in 2021, immediately following the “vaccine” rollout, when the virus had already been circulating in 2020.

If the cause was truly the virus, then the death rate should have surged in 2020, not in 2021, when “vaccines” were supposed to be offering protection.

This glaring discrepancy points to a disturbing possibility: the vaccines, far from providing protection, may have played a direct role in the surge of mortality.

And while the government continues to deflect responsibility, the data is speaking for itself, and it’s impossible to ignore.

Yet, Singapore is not alone as heavily “vaccinated” nations around the world continue to suffer devastating spikes in excess mortality.

As Slay News reported last month, a new analysis of official government data from around the world has revealed that excess deaths are skyrocketing in nations with the highest rates of Covid mRNA “vaccination.”

Excess deaths remain significantly elevated in most Western countries, five years after the pandemic began.

Dr. John Campbell, a medical commentator, is one of the few medical experts asking why.

Campbell raised the alarm on his YouTube show, analyzing excess death data from Our World in Data for 20 countries.

Western nations with high mRNA COVID-19 vaccine usage continue to see unusually high death rates, while countries with lower vaccine uptake or different vaccine strategies are seeing fewer deaths.

“It’s the end of May 2025, and we’re still seeing excess deaths in most Western countries, but not in Eastern countries,” Campbell said.

“What could the difference possibly be?”

In the U.S., from 2020 through early 2025, excess deaths remained at least 10% higher than the pre-pandemic average.

In the second half of 2021 through early 2022, they spiked to a shocking 46%.

However, they only started surging after Covid “vaccines” were rolled out for public use in early 2021, and not before.

“We see excess deaths in the United States a bit above the 10% mark for quite a long period of time,” Campbell said.

“This is an ongoing issue compared to 2015 to 2019 levels.”

Western countries such as Australia, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, New Zealand, the Netherlands, and the U.K. also saw death rates hovering around 10% above normal.

Singapore’s aggressive vaccine mandate pushed nearly the entire population into compliance, with the government implementing strict restrictions on the unvaccinated and relentless propaganda urging people to get vaccinated.

Now, in the wake of the most comprehensive vaccination campaign in the world, we are seeing the horrific aftermath, a country where excess deaths have become the new norm.

For vaccine skeptics and critics of the global vaccine agenda, Singapore’s experience is a warning sign that must not be ignored.

These shocking numbers highlight a reality that many have feared: the vaccination campaigns, backed by powerful global health organizations and governments, could be causing more harm than good.

With deaths continuing to rise above expected levels, it becomes impossible to ignore the possibility that the vaccines, rather than the virus itself, could be responsible for these excess deaths.

Meanwhile, citizens who fail to comply with the Singaporean government’s aggressive “vaccination” push are now facing severe penalties.

As Slay News reported, Singapore has just updated its laws to make it a crime to refuse mandatory “vaccines,” punishable with prison time.

The updates to the nation’s laws open the door to criminal prosecution for members of the public who refuse to submit to government-mandated injections.

New amendments to Sections 47, 65, and 67 of Singapore’s 1976 Infectious Diseases Act (IDA) now mean that people who refuse to get “vaccinated” when directed to by the government would be considered criminals and face prosecution.

Under these new laws, people who refuse “vaccines” may be imprisoned for up to 6 months or receive a fine of up to SGD$10,000 (US$7,738), or both, for a first offense.

Repeat offenders may be jailed for up to 12 months and receive a fine of up to SGD $20,000 (US$15,477), or both.

As governments and global organizations continue to push for mandatory “vaccinations,” it’s more important than ever to scrutinize the true impact of these policies.

Singapore’s experience is not an isolated incident as it’s part of a global trend of unprecedented mortality rates following aggressive “vaccine” rollouts, raising serious questions about the real motives behind these campaigns.

Is this all part of a globalist agenda to enforce compliance, suppress dissent, and push for ever more control over the population?

Singapore’s data gives us a glimpse into the dark side of these policies, where unchecked mandates and big government overreach come with a cost of human life.

The silencing of dissent around the safety of Covid injections has led to an environment where transparency is sacrificed for political gain and power.

Singapore’s excess mortality serves as a red flag that demands an independent investigation into the full scope of vaccine-related injuries and deaths.

The public deserves answers, and accountability is long overdue.

As those raising concerns about the safety of mRNA “vaccines” continue to be labeled as “conspiracy theorists” and alarmists, the facts on the ground are becoming harder to ignore.

Singapore’s experience is a grave reminder that the cost of blind obedience to the government’s health mandates could be far higher than we’ve been led to believe.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/singapore-sounds-alarm-excess-deaths-continue-surging-among-covid-vaxxed/

And,

READ MORE – Japan Confirms Covid ‘Vaccines’ Have Now Killed Over 600,000 Citizens

A group of leading American scientists has uncovered evidence linking Covid mRNA “vaccines” to surging reports of thyroid eye disease (TED), an alarming disorder that leads to blindness.

TED, also known as Graves’ ophthalmopathy, causes the eyes to bulge in their sockets due to a severe swelling of the muscles.

The eyes become bloodshot and crossed, causing double vision and total loss in severe cases.

It causes inflammation and swelling of the eye muscles, eyelids, tear glands, and fatty tissues behind the eyes.

Patients first become aware of the condition when they begin to suffer from the initial symptoms, such as bulging, dry, or watery eyes.

In recent years, cases of TED have inexplicably spiked, raising concern among the medical community.

However, a new study has just linked the surging reports to the mass Covid “vaccination” campaign.

The study was conducted by a team of scientists at Stanford University led by Dr. Andrea L. Kossler in collaboration with Dr. Linus Amarikwa of the Truhlsen Eye Institute’s Department of Ophthalmology at the University of Nebraska Medical Center.

The results of the study were published in the Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology.

The bombshell study sheds new light on the risks posed by the Covid mRNA injections, particularly for individuals with pre-existing hyperthyroidism.

The research team utilized the TriNetX electronic health record network to analyze 373,909 patients with hyperthyroidism and no prior TED diagnosis.

Hyperthyroidism is a condition already linked to an increased risk of TED.

The findings reveal that mRNA “vaccination” significantly increases the likelihood of TED onset, sparking urgent calls for further investigation and clinical vigilance.

According to the study, the risk of TED onset surges dramatically after individuals are injected with an mRNA shot.

After controlling for variables such as age, gender, and other health conditions through propensity score matching, they narrowed the dataset down to 69,378 patients in each comparison cohort: vaccinated versus unvaccinated.

The researchers then compared the incidence rates of TED between Covid-vaxxed patients, those who received the influenza shot, and those who got the Tdap vaccine.

Alarming Findings Reveal a 49% Increase in Risk

The results are startling, with the study revealing that patients with hyperthyroidism who received the Covid mRNA jab had a 49% increased risk of developing Thyroid Eye Disease compared to their unvaccinated counterparts (Relative Risk = 1.49).

This increase in risk was even more pronounced when compared to patients who had received the Tdap vaccine, with a staggering 80% higher risk (Relative Risk = 1.80).

Even when compared to influenza vaccine recipients, the risk of TED in Covid “vaccinated” individuals was 68% higher (Relative Risk = 1.68).

These consistent findings across different vaccine types strongly suggest that the elevated risk of TED is directly associated with the Covid mRNA injection, and not just a result of general vaccine reactivity or healthcare-seeking bias.

In light of these significant findings, the research team is urging the medical community to heighten clinical vigilance for hyperthyroid patients following mRNA “vaccination.”

The study’s authors call for better patient counseling regarding the potential risk of developing TED, emphasizing the need for early detection of symptoms to prevent complications.

Additionally, the study’s authors are recommending prospective studies to better understand the underlying mechanisms driving the increased risk and to assess the absolute risk of TED following vaccination.

They are also calling for a thorough evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio in patients with autoimmune thyroid diseases who may be particularly vulnerable.

The Bigger Picture: A Red Flag for mRNA Vaccines

This study adds to the growing body of evidence questioning the long-term safety of mRNA “vaccines.”

With concerns mounting over side effects ranging from heart conditions like myocarditis to now eye disease in hyperthyroid patients, the need for greater transparency and further research into the full spectrum of vaccine risks has never been more critical.

For those who have been skeptical about the widespread push for vaccination, particularly among vulnerable populations, this study serves as a stark reminder of the unforeseen consequences of rushing medical interventions without a thorough understanding of their long-term effects.

As pressure for universal vaccination continues to rise, this study underscores the urgent need for more personalized approaches to public health, focusing on those most at risk of adverse reactions rather than a one-size-fits-all solution.

The study’s findings reveal a deeply concerning pattern: a significant increase in risk for a serious health condition in individuals with pre-existing thyroid issues following mRNA injection.

This issue requires immediate attention, with clinicians and health authorities urged to prioritize patient education, awareness, and ongoing monitoring.

As the push for global vaccine adoption continues, transparency, medical autonomy, and a thorough understanding of long-term risks must remain the priority.

The health and well-being of individuals should always come before political agendas or corporate interests.

Folow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/stanford-scientists-link-spike-thyroid-eye-disease-covid-vaccines/

And,

READ MORE – Singapore Sounds Alarm as Excess Deaths Continue Surging Among Covid-Vaxxed

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is facing explosive accusations after it emerged that former chairman Klaus Schwab was manipulating data to undermine Brexit and damage the reputation of the United Kingdom in an effort to advance the globalist agenda.

Schwab, the WEF’s founder and the figurehead of the Davos elite, is at the center of the scandal.

He is accused of interfering in the Global Competitiveness Report to ensure that the Brexit vote was seen as a failure.

In a shocking revelation, Schwab, who has long been a kingpin of the globalist elite, allegedly orchestrated a rigging of the figures in the 2017/2018 report.

The WEF’s report tracks the long-term economic health and productivity of nations.

Following a change in methodology, the UK had enjoyed an improvement in its ranking, rising from seventh to fourth.

However, Schwab reportedly intervened to ensure that the UK would not receive any positive recognition, fearing it would be exploited by the Brexit camp.

A leaked internal investigation has shown that Schwab intervened, demanding that the UK’s improvement in global competitiveness be erased.

Schwab cited concerns about Brexit’s potential success.

The final report, which downgraded the UK to eighth place, is now under scrutiny as the WEF’s own internal corruption comes into the spotlight.

The World Economic Forum’s tactics raise serious questions about the organization’s true motives and its disdain for national sovereignty.

Schwab’s alleged manipulation of data has been branded as “anti-democratic” by critics who see this as part of a broader attempt by the global elite to suppress movements that challenge the globalist narrative.

Priti Patel, the UK’s Shadow Foreign Secretary, slammed Schwab’s interference, calling it a “stain on the reputation” of the WEF.

She added, “For such a senior figure in geopolitical affairs to have conspired and manipulated information against Brexit and the democratic outcome of a political process is a stain on the reputation of the WEF and those who are part of that forum.”

The UK’s democratic decision to leave the European Union has been a major point of contention for those who believe in national sovereignty and independence.

And the WEF’s manipulation of facts to downplay Brexit’s potential benefits exposes the elitist global establishment’s hostility toward any efforts that reduce their centralized power.

The WEF’s efforts to suppress national sovereignty don’t stop with Brexit.

The globalist elite have long been pushing for a “one-world government” that disregards national boundaries and identities.

This latest scandal exposes their sinister manipulation in a way that can’t be ignored.

Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, didn’t hold back when discussing the latest revelations, stating:

“Every conspiracy theory about Klaus Schwab now turns out to be true.

“He is a dangerous globalist manipulator.”

Richard Tice, deputy leader of Reform UK, also weighed in, saying:

“No surprise the globalist WEF appears to have distorted facts to prevent sovereignty and independence from being seen as a good thing.

“They are a dreadful organization that Reform will have nothing to do with.”

Lord Frost, who negotiated the Brexit deal that saw the UK officially leave the EU, added that this manipulation by Schwab was “direct evidence” of the global establishment’s hostility to Brexit and a further example of how they attempt to suppress any movement toward national independence.

This disturbing trend is part of a broader effort by the globalist establishment to force nations into submission, quashing any form of populist resistance to their centralized, top-down control.

The WEF’s concerted effort to suppress the benefits of Brexit shows just how deep this agenda runs.

As the “Davos Man” continues to manipulate economic data and influence world leaders, it’s becoming increasingly clear that the global elite’s agenda is to undermine democracy, sovereignty, and independence in favor of a unified global governance system.

This scandal comes as the WEF’s influence continues to grow, but the public is waking up to the reality of its deceptive tactics and covert manipulation.

With the final report on Schwab’s financial dealings and his alleged abuse of power expected soon, the public deserves full transparency into how these global elites are shaping the world to fit their authoritarian vision.

The world is watching as the WEF’s manipulative agenda comes under scrutiny, and the question remains: will we allow the global elite to dictate our future, or will we fight for national sovereignty and democracy?

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/klaus-schwab-rigged-wef-data-brexit-appear-failure/

And,

READ MORE – WEF & Gates-Funded Scientists Develop Mutant ‘Bird Flu’ That Rapidly Spreads in Humans with 100% Kill Rate

Florida’s top health official is calling for a ban on Covid injections, warning that mRNA “vaccines” are not safe for use by “any human beings.”

In a bold and direct challenge to the ongoing push for Covid mRNA shots, Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo has escalated his criticism.

During a press conference, Ladapo declared that the mRNA injections “should not be used in any human beings.”

Ladapo, a vocal advocate for medical transparency and cautious public health policies, has called for a comprehensive investigation into vaccine injuries, echoing growing concerns about the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines, especially among individuals who have been repeatedly “boosted.”

During a press conference in Tampa, Florida, Ladapo commended the recent shift in federal guidance led by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Kennedy announced in May that the Covid “vaccines” would no longer be recommended for healthy children and pregnant women.

This shift represents a dramatic departure from previous public health policies, reflecting mounting skepticism about the safety of these vaccines, especially among vulnerable populations.

Ladapo’s bold assertion that the mRNA “vaccines” are not only ineffective but also potentially increase the risk of severe illness, particularly for those who have received multiple boosters, is not without foundation.

As Florida’s first state to formally recommend against vaccination for healthy children, and more recently, the broader population, the state has taken a stand that continues to challenge the mainstream narrative.

Ladapo’s remarks were pointed and clear.

“These products should not be used in any human beings,” he declared, calling for more investigation into the reports of “vaccine” injuries.

The top health official specifically emphasized that people who have received repeated boosters appear to be at the highest risk of serious illness from COVID-19.

The call for greater scrutiny of vaccine injuries aligns with ongoing concerns about underreporting of adverse effects linked to mRNA shots.

As the global rollout of these vaccines continues, there is growing demand for transparency from health authorities about the full scope of potential risks, especially as reports of long-term complications continue to surface.

However, Ladapo’s statements have ignited sharp backlash from mainstream health organizations.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), both influential in shaping U.S. medical policy, have remained steadfast in their endorsement of the Covid “vaccines.”

These organizations continue to recommend vaccination for pregnant women and children over six months, despite growing concerns from some segments of the medical community.

Dr. Rana Alissa, of the Florida chapter of the AAP, was quick to dismiss Ladapo’s conclusions, stating:

“Honestly, we don’t know where his data are coming from.

“And it’s not going to deter us from continuing to recommend the vaccines.”

Alissa emphasized that decades of research and scientific evidence should not be disregarded based on the opinions of a single individual or group, framing Ladapo’s views as “conspiracy theories” rather than legitimate scientific debate.

ACOG, too, continues to advocate for vaccination, highlighting the increased risks of severe outcomes during pregnancy.

The organization also maintains that the vaccine offers protection to infants after birth, framing its stance as rooted in evidence-based science, though many critics question the transparency and robustness of the data supporting such claims.

Despite the entrenched resistance from leading medical organizations, Florida has remained defiant in its opposition to blanket vaccine mandates.

Since March 2022, Florida became the first state to recommend against Covid vaccination for healthy children, and in 2024, the state expanded that guidance to all populations.

This stance has garnered support from vaccine skeptics who argue that the government’s aggressive promotion of mRNA vaccines lacks sufficient transparency about their long-term effects.

Ladapo’s call for deeper investigations is in line with these concerns, as many continue to question the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, especially in light of ongoing reports of adverse reactions.

The ongoing debate over COVID-19 vaccines is far from settled, and the lawsuit filed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, and the American Public Health Association against Robert F. Kennedy Jr. underscores the intensity of the ideological divide.

The lawsuit, filed in July, claims that the revised vaccine recommendations undermine public trust in the vaccines—a point fiercely contested by many who believe the push for vaccines has been politicized and mishandled by government authorities.

Dr. Ladapo’s unwavering stance serves as a rallying cry for those who believe in medical freedom and demand greater accountability from public health officials.

As more evidence of vaccine-related injuries emerges, the call for a transparent and honest investigation has never been more urgent.

The controversy over mRNA vaccinations is far from over, and as the debate rages on, Florida’s bold stance is sure to continue challenging the status quo.

With medical transparency and patient safety at the forefront, this issue is poised to shape public health policy for years to come.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/floridas-health-chief-calls-mrna-vaccine-ban-should-not-used-human-beings/

And,

READ MORE – Scientists Sound Alarm Over ‘Magnetic Nanoparticles’ in Covid ‘Vaccines’

A major new study is raising the alarm about the deadly long-term risks now faced by people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The massive new study tracked the outcomes of people in Australia for 18 months after they received their injections.

The team of researchers, led by Dr. Lucy Deng from the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance (NCIRS), sought to analyze the long-term risks from potentially fatal conditions caused by mRNA “vaccines.”

Alarmingly, the scientists found that patients were still suffering from a deadly heart condition at the end of the 18-month study, indicating that they could be carrying a ticking time bomb for many years to come.

The study was published in the prestigious Nature’s July 2025 Vaccines medical journal.

The discovery has raised alarming questions about the long-term health risks of the Covid mRNA “vaccines,” particularly for those who suffer from myocarditis, a potentially life-threatening inflammation of the heart muscle.

Often referred to as a “silent killer,” myocarditis restricts the heart’s ability to pump blood.

The dangerous condition can, without warning, trigger a blood clot, stroke, or cardiac arrest, ultimately leading to sudden death.

According to the research, 35% of individuals diagnosed with myocarditis following the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna Covid mRNA injections experienced lingering symptoms 12 to 18 months after their initial diagnosis.

This long-term data reinforces growing concerns among a growing number of experts and advocates of medical transparency about the risks that have been downplayed in earlier stages of the “vaccination” campaign.

The study tracked 256 individuals who had been diagnosed with myocarditis after receiving the mRNA “vaccines.”

The findings indicate that a significant portion of patients continue to experience damaged heart tissue long after the acute phase of the illness has passed.

This is particularly concerning for those who were told the benefits of the mRNA shots outweighed any risks.

The study tracked individuals diagnosed with myocarditis in Australia between April 2021 and July 2022.

The cohort was carefully monitored through national adverse event reporting systems, with clinical confirmation of myocarditis, structured interviews, and standardized health surveys at both 3-6 months and 12-18 months after their diagnosis.

This prospective study design aimed to provide an in-depth look at the long-term impacts of myocarditis linked to the mRNA injections.

The results are deeply concerning for those who have been advocating for a more cautious, transparent approach to “vaccine” safety.

The results paint a troubling picture of the persistent and potentially devastating effects of myocarditis, especially for younger, male patients.

While the majority of myocarditis cases were mild (with a median hospital stay of only two days and no ICU admissions), 35% of patients still reported persistent symptoms 12 to 18 months after their initial diagnosis.

These ongoing symptoms, primarily chest pain, palpitations, and fatigue, highlight the fact that myocarditis is not just a temporary side effect but could lead to long-term health complications.

Notably, 13% of the patients who had myocarditis were still on medication to manage their symptoms, and 8% reported self-imposed restrictions on exercise.

Even more concerning, 5.6% of patients required hospitalization again due to the lingering effects of myocarditis.

These statistics underscore the reality that myocarditis can be a “silent killer,” with long-term risks that could increase the likelihood of sudden death or other severe complications.

This should raise red flags for anyone advocating for the continued use of mRNA shots without proper acknowledgment of the risks involved, particularly for young, healthy individuals who were led to believe the “vaccines” were safe and without consequence.

One of the more concerning aspects of the study was that nearly 23% of patients, despite experiencing myocarditis, chose to pursue revaccination, sometimes with another mRNA jab.

The decision to push additional doses despite the known risks raises serious questions about the long-term safety of continuing to administer mRNA “vaccines” to people who have already suffered from a significant adverse reaction.

This is especially troubling for advocates of medical transparency, who argue that there needs to be much clearer information about the potential risks of revaccination, particularly for those who have already been affected by myocarditis.

Just as important is the need for more transparent data about the ongoing health impacts faced by those who choose to undergo further vaccinations.

This study is an important step toward understanding the long-term risks associated with mRNA vaccines, but it also highlights the glaring gaps in research that still need to be addressed.

The researchers emphasize the need for further exploration into the mechanisms behind persistent symptoms and for more targeted monitoring and risk stratification for those who are most at risk.

The call for medical transparency in the wake of these findings is clear.

As vaccine mandates and boosters continue to be pushed by governments and health authorities, it is critical that patients are fully informed about the long-term risks associated with mRNA vaccines, including the risk of myocarditis and other potential heart complications.

Furthermore, as new data surfaces, health officials must engage in a more honest conversation about the risks and the necessity of monitoring individuals who experience adverse reactions.

This study adds to the growing body of evidence that mRNA vaccines can have serious long-term consequences for some individuals, particularly in terms of cardiovascular health.

With 35% of patients suffering from lingering symptoms of myocarditis 12-18 months after vaccination, it’s clear that the full scope of risks associated with the vaccines has not been adequately communicated to the public.

For those advocating for transparency in medical practices, this study is a wake-up call.

The time has come for a more honest and open conversation about the potential dangers of mRNA “vaccines” and the need for continued research, especially when it comes to young people and vulnerable populations.

Until then, individuals must be fully aware of the risks they face when making decisions about vaccination, and the medical community must step up its commitment to transparency and full disclosure.

Folow the link for thesource of the Article… https://slaynews.com/news/study-exposes-long-term-sudden-death-risk-among-covid-vaxxed/

And,

READ MORE – Scientists Sound Alarm Over ‘Magnetic Nanoparticles’ in Covid ‘Vaccines’

The Netherlands continues to face alarming issues surrounding its euthanasia law, with a new government study revealing disturbing trends in citizens being euthanized without consent.

In addition to euthanasia without explicit consent (LAWER), the report also reveals a surge in unreported “assisted suicide” deaths.

These findings raise serious concerns as the ever-expanding liberal euthanasia policies spiral into a radical eugenics ideology, especially as vulnerable populations remain at risk of being targeted for “assisted death” without their consent.

The data from the Netherlands, known for its controversial euthanasia and “assisted” suicide laws, indicates that there were 9,799 “assisted deaths” in 2021.

Of which, 9,283 were assisted suicides, and shockingly, 517 were cases of euthanasia performed without the explicit request or consent of the individual, also known as LAWER.

This troubling statistic shows that approximately 0.3% of all deaths in the Netherlands that year were people whose lives were ended without consent.

The finding further fuels concerns about the potential for a slippery slope into state-sanctioned medical homicide.

While euthanasia is already a controversial and divisive issue, the phenomenon of “assisted suicide” without consent, especially in vulnerable or incapacitated individuals, raises critical moral, ethical, and legal questions.

In the Netherlands, LAWER has become a consistent issue over the years, with studies indicating that a significant percentage of these cases are not reported.

In 2021, there were 517 LAWER deaths, which mirrors similar figures from the 2015 study, where 431 people were killed without consent.

Even more alarming is the fact that six of these 517 deaths in 2021 were newborns, some of whom were likely victims of the Groningen Protocol, a legal framework in the Netherlands allowing doctors to euthanize newborns with disabilities if deemed “incompatible with life” by the parents and doctors.

The idea of legally terminating the lives of babies, as seen in these cases, should be a chilling warning of how quickly medical euthanasia can expand to justify the killing of vulnerable populations who cannot advocate for themselves.

Perhaps even more troubling than the occurrence of LAWER deaths is the issue of underreporting in the Netherlands.

The 2021 study revealed that there were 2,133 unreported cases of euthanasia, which is roughly 22% of all assisted deaths that year.

This continues a disturbing trend seen in previous years, with underreporting consistently hovering around 20-23% of all assisted deaths since the law’s inception.

These unreported deaths raise serious questions about the accountability and oversight of euthanasia practices in the Netherlands and whether patients’ rights are being trampled under the guise of compassionate care.

The 2021 study’s findings align with the 2015 study, which similarly found that 1,693 assisted deaths were not reported.

Without proper transparency, it’s impossible to know how many of these unreported deaths were performed without consent or were otherwise illegal or unethical.

The data from the Netherlands raises a critical question about whether euthanasia without consent is happening in other countries that have legalized “assisted suicide.”

In Canada, for instance, the practice of euthanasia (known as Medical Assistance in Dying, or MAiD) has rapidly expanded since its legalization in 2016.

Yet, Canada has not commissioned studies like the Netherlands’ five-year reports to assess the full scope of euthanasia abuse.

Evidence from Quebec suggests that underreporting may be happening in Canada as well.

In 2021-2022, a discrepancy of 289 euthanasia deaths was noted, highlighting a seven percent underreporting rate.

While the Canadian government has yet to commission a comprehensive study on euthanasia, the troubling patterns from the Netherlands and Quebec suggest that similar issues could be occurring across the country.

The U.S., with several states legalizing “assisted suicide,” may also be facing similar issues of underreporting. A recent report from Oregon revealed that while 376 assisted suicide deaths were officially reported in 2024, 178 cases had unknown ingestion statuses, meaning it is unclear whether these people actually died from assisted suicide.

Without proper oversight and transparent reporting mechanisms, the potential for abuse is significant.

Legalizing euthanasia and assisted suicide was initially sold as a compassionate choice for terminally ill patients.

However, the Netherlands’ own data from years of experience with the practice paints a far more troubling picture.

As the law expands to include vulnerable populations, including newborns and individuals with disabilities, the risk of state-sanctioned medical homicide grows.

The unchecked rise of euthanasia practices, coupled with persistent underreporting and cases of euthanasia without explicit consent, reveals a darker side of the “right to die” movement, one that risks spiraling into a radical eugenics ideology.

In the Netherlands, euthanasia is not confined to terminally ill patients but has increasingly extended to individuals with disabilities or mental health issues.

As we have seen in the case of newborns under the Groningen Protocol, the potential for euthanasia to be used as a tool for social engineering is real.

The state’s involvement in deciding who lives and dies based on perceived quality of life or disability could pave the way for future justifications of euthanasia for “undesirable” members of society.

The data from the Netherlands, with its alarming rates of euthanasia without consent and widespread underreporting, should serve as a wake-up call.

The normalization of euthanasia, combined with a lack of oversight, is creating a dangerous precedent.

It is clear that euthanasia laws must be carefully scrutinized and implemented with strict safeguards to protect vulnerable individuals from exploitation or coercion.

It is imperative that other nations, including Canada and the U.S., take heed of the Netherlands’ ongoing struggles and consider the long-term consequences of expanding euthanasia laws.

Without robust checks and balances, euthanasia could easily become a tool for political and ideological control, leading us down a slippery slope to a future where the value of human life is increasingly defined by arbitrary standards of productivity, health, and societal worth.

As conservatives, pro-life advocates, and anyone concerned with the integrity of human rights, the public must demand transparency, accountability, and a firm rejection of any ideology that seeks to undermine the sanctity of life in favor of dangerous, radical policies.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/dutch-government-euthanizing-hundreds-citizens-year-without-consent/

And,

READ MORE – Euthanasia Activist Arrested After Dead Woman Found Strangled Inside ‘Suicide Pod’

Leading oncology scientists in Brazil have just announced a major breakthrough in the fight against cancer.

A team of scientists at Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) has discovered that ivermectin nanoparticles destroy cancer cells, massively reducing tumors.

In a groundbreaking preclinical study, researchers led by Drs. Maiara Callegaro Velho and Ruy Carlos Ruver Beck showed that a nano-encapsulated form of ivermectin, when delivered intranasally, reduced glioma tumor volume in rats by over 70%.

The discovery is being hailed as a major development in the fight against glioblastoma, one of the deadliest forms of brain cancer.

The results of the study were published in ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering.

This is the first study to investigate “nose-to-brain IVM delivery using nanotechnology,” the authors noted.

The team tested two ivermectin nanoformulations:

• IVM-NC: Ivermectin encapsulated in poly(ε-caprolactone) nano capsules

• IVM-MCM: Ivermectin within mesoporous silica particles

Only the IVM-NC formulation proved capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier and significantly reducing tumor size.

Rats received a tiny daily dose, just 60 μg/day, for 10 days via a non-invasive intranasal spray.

The result was a tumor shrinkage of more than 70%, along with healthier brain tissue, reduced swelling, and less abnormal blood vessel growth.

The treatment did not cause organ damage or lung toxicity.

These effects were observed at doses nearly 8 times lower than the amount approved for human antiparasitic use.

While ivermectin became a political flashpoint during the Covid pandemic, this study marks an exciting new breakthrough in oncology.

The study is rooted in science-based evidence with no exaggerations, leaving no room for establishment figures to dispute the findings.

The researchers emphasized the challenges of delivering therapeutics to the brain and how polymeric nano-carriers via intranasal delivery may finally offer a solution.

The scientists note that ivermectin’s bioavailability and inability to cross the blood-brain barrier have long hampered its cancer-fighting potential.

But nanoencapsulation may unlock the drug’s multi-target capabilities, especially against hard-to-treat brain tumors.

“This rigorously conducted study stays on an evidence-based science track,” the authors emphasized.

“The researchers avoided hyperbole, grounded the study in mechanistic oncology, and pursued a delivery route… with a growing track record in neurotherapeutics.”

This study signals a serious scientific breakthrough using a well-known, low-cost drug, repurposed in a novel nanoform.

Delivered non-invasively through the nose, ivermectin can be used to fight one of the most lethal cancers known to medicine.

The political noise around ivermectin has distracted from its emerging anticancer profile.

But if these findings hold in humans, intranasal nano-ivermectin could become one of the most accessible and revolutionary therapies for brain cancer in decades.

Further research is needed, but the science is too compelling to ignore.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/scientists-announce-major-breakthrough-ivermectin-nanoparticles-destroy-cancer-cells/

And,

READ MORE – FDA Admits Covid mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Cause Cancer