World Freedom

Leading experts in Italy have just sent shockwaves through the scientific world after a bombshell peer-reviewed study confirmed that deadly “turbo cancers” are surging among people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The findings have blown apart the carefully crafted narrative pushed by Big Pharma, corporate media, so-called “fact-checkers,” and government health bureaucrats.

For the first time, a population-wide cohort of nearly 300,000 people tracked over 30 months shows alarming signals.

The study confirmed that the so-called “safe and effective” mRNA injections are responsible for sharp global increases in multiple rapidly spreading cancers.

The high-profile team of researchers was led by Italian Professor Cecilia Acuti Martellucci of the University of Bologna’s Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences.

The results of the study were published in EXCLI Journal.

Researchers followed every resident aged 11 and older in Italy’s Pescara province from June 2021 through December 2023.

They tracked hospital records and adjusted for age, sex, prior conditions, and even prior COVID-19 infection.

The researchers found that “vaccinated” individuals had far higher hospitalization rates for new cancer diagnoses than the unvaccinated, particularly for breast, bladder, and colorectal cancers.

Hospitalizations for cancer were 35% higher in the vaccinated (HR 1.23). The risk spike was strongest among men and those with no prior COVID infection.

Breakdowns:

• Overall Cancer Risk: +23% after just one dose

• Breast Cancer: +54% increased risk

• Bladder Cancer: +62% increased risk

• Colorectal Cancer: +35% increased risk

The researchers warn that the danger persisted and continued increasing after multiple doses.

The study notes that people who get “vaccinated” tend to be healthier, wealthier, and more likely to seek preventive care.

This is often referred to as the so-called “healthy vaccinee bias.”

If anything, that should have meant lower cancer rates.

Instead, however, cancers surged among the Covid-vaxxed while the unvaccinated saw no change.

Because of the “healthy vaccinee bias,” the researchers argue that the real danger could be far worse than what the numbers suggest.

McCullough Foundation epidemiologist Nicolas Hulsher broke down the findings and converted the data to reveal the increased risk of each type of cancer following an mRNA injection.

Overall cancer risk:

• +23% increased risk after ≥1 dose (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11–1.37) (statistically significant)
• +9% increased risk after ≥3 doses (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02–1.16) (statistically significant)

Breast cancer:

• +54% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.10–2.16) (statistically significant)
• +36% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08–1.72) (statistically significant)

Bladder cancer:

• +62% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.07–2.45) (statistically significant)
• +43% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.08–1.88) (statistically significant)

Colon-rectum cancer:

• +35% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01–1.80) (statistically significant)
• +14% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.96–1.36) (not statistically significant)

Hematological cancers (leukemia/lymphoma):

• +31% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.96–1.79) (not statistically significant)
• +7% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.89–1.29) (not statistically significant)

Uterine cancer:

• +77% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.77, 95% CI 0.76–4.13) (not statistically significant)
• +20% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.73–1.96) (not statistically significant)

Ovarian cancer:

• +71% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.71, 95% CI 0.60–4.82) (not statistically significant)
• +86% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.86, 95% CI 0.68–5.12) (not statistically significant)

Thyroid cancer:

• +58% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.84–2.99) (not statistically significant)
• -3% with ≥3 doses (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.67–1.45) (not statistically significant)

Prostate cancer:

• +1% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.68–1.49) (not statistically significant)
• -3% with ≥3 doses (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.76–1.23) (not statistically significant)

Lung cancer:

-10% with ≥1 dose (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.68–1.18) (not statistically significant)
-7% with ≥3 doses (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.79–1.11) (not statistically significant)
The strongest, statistically significant increases were found for breast, bladder, colorectal, and overall cancer risk, Hulscher notes.

Nearly all other cancer sites also showed an upward trend among the “vaccinated.”.

Only lung and prostate cancers showed no evidence of increased risk.

This pattern suggests a real signal that is partially obscured by confounders and limited follow-up time.

Huslcher asserts that the study provides further evidence that confirms mRNA shots cause turbo cancers.

“Findings of increased cancer risks following COVID-19 mRNA injection are consistent with previously published evidence,” he writes.

“A recent literature review outlined over 100 peer-reviewed studies that indicate mRNA injections may cause or accelerate cancer via 17 distinct biological mechanisms.”

“Moreover, a new peer-reviewed paper titled, “COVID-19 mRNA-Induced Turbo Cancers,” formally defines this fatal syndrome and compiles the growing body of clinical cases, epidemiological signals, and mechanistic pathways explaining how COVID-19 mRNA shots and the spike protein may drive sudden, aggressive, treatment-resistant cancers,” he added.

Doctors and whistleblowers have been sounding the alarm for years about sudden, aggressive cancers appearing in otherwise healthy people after the jab.

The phenomenon has become so common that a new term has entered the medical lexicon: “Turbo cancer.”

Oncologists have been warning that their seemingly healthy patients are often dying within a week of being diagnosed with turbo cancer.

This Italian study now joins more than 100 peer-reviewed papers that confirm disturbing pathways between mRNA injections and malignancy.

Corporate media outlets and health officials have long insisted the shots were temporary instructions, gone within days.

But mounting evidence shows lingering genetic material and long-term biological disruption.

The Pescara study is just the latest smoking gun of evidence proving that deadly cancers are surging among the “vaccinated.”

However, it also shows that the effect is strongest where no “confounding” Covid infection could be blamed.

If this signal holds true, the consequences for global health and for the institutions that promoted universal “vaccination” will be devastating.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/italy-raises-alarm-skyrocketing-turbo-cancers-among-covid-vaxxed/

And,

READ MORE – Top Oncologist: Turbo Cancers Surging in Unborn Babies of Covid-Vaxxed Mothers

A bombshell new peer-reviewed study has dropped a hammer on the official Covid narrative, concluding that both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the mRNA “vaccines” share “deliberately engineered” features consistent with gain-of-function biological weapons research.

The researchers behind the study warn that the mRNA injections have caused “unprecedented levels of morbidity and mortality.”

The study’s paper was authored by 11 scientific and legal experts.

It was published in the prestigious Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

The paper argues that the genetic signatures of SARS-CoV-2, and the dangerous spike protein it shares with the vaccines, “represent a violation of the Biological Weapons Convention.”

The study lays out what many have long suspected but few dared to say: COVID-19 was not a natural accident, and the vaccine rollout only deepened the harm.

“Far from benign, these vaccines have unleashed profound harm, disrupting nearly every system of the human body and contributing to unprecedented levels of morbidity and mortality,” the paper states.

Lead author Dr. Andrew Zywiec did not mince words:

“The systemic toxicity unleashed by these interventions, manifesting as autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular devastation, aggressive cancers, and catastrophic reproductive harms, represents not merely a public health failure but a profound betrayal of trust.”

The paper details a cascade of harms linked to the vaccines, from “autoimmune diseases and cardiovascular catastrophes to pregnancy complications and aggressive cancers.”

Joseph Sansone, Ph.D., who has filed suit to prohibit mRNA “vaccines” in Florida, called the study historic:

“This is the first peer-reviewed journal article stating that both Covid and the Covid injections violate the Biological Weapons Convention and that both COVID-19 and the Covid injections are biological weapons.”

The authors identify multiple red flags in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, including the notorious furin cleavage site, absent in nature but known to “enhance infectivity” in engineered viruses.

The paper cites military scientists who previously described SARS-CoV-2 as containing “evidence of manipulation” that makes it an “attractive pathogen.”

According to the authors, these manipulations were not just reckless science; they were illegal under the 1975 Biological Weapons Convention.

The study directly accuses former NIAID director Dr. Anthony Fauci and U.S. intelligence officials of concealing the engineered origins of the virus.

It points to Project DEFUSE, a 2018 EcoHealth Alliance proposal to DARPA that outlined creating coronaviruses with features eerily similar to SARS-CoV-2, including the furin cleavage site.

While DARPA rejected the proposal, EcoHealth and Wuhan collaborators allegedly pursued the experiments with other funding.

The paper highlights the now-infamous Feb. 1, 2020, Fauci call with top virologists.

Some of those virologists admitted that the virus looked engineered before co-authoring the widely cited “Proximal Origin” paper claiming the opposite.

That paper, the study notes, became one of the most cited publications of 2020 and was used worldwide to suppress the lab-leak theory.

“The deliberate concealment of critical genomic features delayed public awareness and pandemic mitigation efforts, potentially allowing wider spread and more deaths,” the authors state.

Perhaps the most disturbing claim is that the spike protein from the mRNA injections doesn’t just vanish after 48 hours, as promised.

The study cites evidence of spike protein and vaccine nucleic acids lingering in the body for months, even years, detected in heart tissue, blood plasma, placentas, breast milk, and now even tumors.

“Prolonged protein expression, exemplified by S1 spike protein detection more than 700 days post-Covid vaccination, underscores the potential for irreversible harm,” the authors warn.

Military data cited in the paper show alarming spikes in myocarditis (151%), pulmonary embolism (43%), ovarian dysfunction (35%), and multiple cancers following the “vaccine” rollout.

The paper lands just as HHS pulled broad authorization for Covid “vaccines” and canceled nearly $500 million in mRNA research contracts.

Its conclusion is blunt:

“The surge in autoimmune diseases, aggressive cancers, pregnancy losses, cardiovascular fatalities, societal fragmentation, and the looming risks of advanced mRNA platforms demand an immediate halt to mRNA vaccine and biologic use, comprehensive investigations into the motives behind this unprecedented violation of public trust, and robust measures to restore safe therapeutics and ethical public health practices.”

Co-author Dr. Irene Mavrakakis went further, demanding:

“Complete recall of all COVID-19 vaccines and biologics and a moratorium on all mRNA biologics,” along with the criminal prosecution of decision-makers who “were criminally negligent and failed in their duties.”

She added that vaccine manufacturers must lose the liability shields granted under federal law.

This study represents the most direct challenge yet to the official Covid narrative.

It doesn’t just question safety, it raises the possibility that both the virus and the “vaccines” were products of deliberate engineering, with catastrophic consequences.

And the authors are clear, warning the public that the damage is ongoing, and the truth can no longer be ignored.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/major-study-covid-vaccines-deliberately-engineered-cause-unprecedented-levels-death/

And,

READ MORE – Top Scientist Issues Alert: mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Trigger ‘Unexplained Cancers’

Leading experts in South Korea have just issued a global alert after bombshell data exposed evidence linking Covid mRNA “vaccines” to the deadly heart condition responsible for skyrocketing sudden deaths recorded around the world.

A sweeping new study by South Korean scientists has delivered yet another devastating blow to the official “safe and effective” narrative.

The study found that mRNA injections are directly linked to a surge in myocarditis and sudden cardiac deaths, especially in young “healthy” men.

The team of researchers was led by Dr. Myeong Geun Choi of Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital.

They analyzed more than 2 million vaccinated adults and 334,000 unvaccinated adults using Korea’s powerful National Health Insurance Database.

The insurance database is vital as it reveals true causes of death and “vaccination” status without the biases typically found in mortality data.

The findings should alarm regulators worldwide.

The results of the study were published in the medical journal PubMed.

During the study, the team looked at serious heart, lung, and clotting events in the weeks following “vaccination.”

What they found was stark:

• Myocarditis risk skyrocketed after “vaccination,” overwhelmingly tied to mRNA shots.

• The signal persisted at life-threatening levels across 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months post-vaccination.

• Adjusted hazard ratios showed a nearly 4x higher risk of myocarditis in “vaccinated” patients.

• The excess was heavily concentrated in men under 45, the very group previously thought least at risk from Covid itself.

• Adenoviral-vector vaccines showed far lower myocarditis hazards, while mRNA schedules tracked with fatal cardiac events.

Researchers noted that the data directly links surges in sudden cardiac deaths and heart damage to the mRNA “vaccines.”

This was not a small dataset or anecdotal case series.

With more than 2 million “vaccinated” adults and rigorous controls for age, sex, comorbidities, and prior infections, the results expose a signal that can no longer be waved away as “rare.”

Younger adults were at the highest risk, especially men under 45.

Myocarditis was the clearest and strongest danger signal.

However, pulmonary clots, atrial fibrillation, and strokes were also tracked.

The evidence aligns with global reports of sudden cardiac deaths among the young and healthy in the aftermath of mass mRNA rollouts.

This massive real-world study makes clear what critics of the “vaccine” program have long warned.

The supposed “safe and effective” mRNA products carry very real, very deadly risks that were downplayed or ignored.

The authors stress that healthy younger men, one of the demographics least threatened by Covid itself, bore the brunt of vaccine-linked heart damage.

The Korean researchers conclude that their insurance-based analysis offers “unbiased evidence” reflecting global realities.

Myocarditis risk is not theoretical; it is measurable, elevated, and concentrated in mRNA schedules.

Their findings demand urgent action:

Targeted counseling and monitoring for anyone given mRNA “vaccines,” especially men under 45.

Clear guidance for those experiencing chest pain, shortness of breath, or palpitations following “vaccination.”

Yet another massive new dataset has confirmed the deadly dangers hiding in plain sight.

It’s long past time for health authorities to stop ignoring them.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/south-korea-sounds-alarm-data-links-covid-vaccines-heart-death-surge/

And,

READ MORE – Landmark Study: Covid ‘Vaccines’ Create Conditions for Cancer to Thrive

A chilling exposé has revealed the disturbing culture festering inside Canada’s rapidly expanding “assisted Euthanasia” regime as doctors openly admit they enjoy euthanizing their patients.

Elaina Plott Calabro’s article in the September edition of The Atlantic, titled “Canada is Killing Itself,” lays bare how far Canada’s euthanasia system has spiraled.

The report shows how medical professionals are now describing killing patients as the “most meaningful work” of their careers.

From the start, what was sold as a “compassionate option” for the terminally ill has become something very different.

In the article, Calabro notes:

“It is too soon to call euthanasia a lifestyle option in Canada, but from the outset, it has proved a case study in momentum.

“MAiD [Medical Assistance in Dying] began as a practice limited to gravely ill patients who were already at the end of life.

“The law was then expanded to include people who were suffering from serious medical conditions but not facing imminent death.

“In two years, MAiD will be made available to those suffering only from mental illness.

“Parliament has also recommended granting access to minors.”

The consequences are devastating.

Patients who cannot afford care are being pushed toward death instead.

Under Canada’s socialised healthcare system, doctors are under pressure to push patients into lower-cost treatments, with MAiD being a far cheaper option than radiotherapy or long-term care.

However, government-funded doctors now appear to be reveling in the opportunity to kill their patients rather than treat them.

As Calabro reports, doctors who have embraced euthanasia no longer hide their zeal for it.

Some have euthanized hundreds of patients, and they are proud of it.

One of the most shocking interviews comes from Dr. Stefanie Green, a physician on Vancouver Island:

“In both fields, she explained, she was guiding a patient through an ‘essentially natural event’ – the emotional and medical choreography ‘of the most important days in their life.’

“She continued the analogy: ‘I thought, Well, one is like delivering life into the world, and the other feels like transitioning and delivering life out.’

“And so Green does not refer to her MAiD deaths only as ‘provisions’ – the term for euthanasia that most clinicians have adopted.

“She also calls them ‘deliveries.’”

Meanwhile, neurologist Gord Gubitz describes the act of killing patients as “energizing”:

“He finds euthanasia to be ‘energizing’ – the ‘most meaningful work’ of his career.

“‘It’s a happy sad, right?’ he explained.

“‘It’s really sad that you were in so much pain. It is sad that your family is racked with grief. But we’re so happy you got what you wanted.’”

And Vancouver euthanasia doctor Ellen Wiebe has gone even further:

“I love my job, I’ve always loved being a doctor, and I delivered over 1,000 babies and I took care of families, but this is the very best work I’ve ever done in the last seven years.”

This is what Canada’s euthanasia law has unleashed.

It is no longer simply a medical procedure, but a culture where doctors and nurse practitioners speak with enthusiasm about killing other human beings.

The reality is stark and shows you are not safe in a system where medical professionals admit they are “happy” or “energized” by killing people.

What began as a promise of compassion has morphed into something far darker.

In this system, death is normalized, monetized, and even celebrated.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-doctors-boast-feeling-energized-euthanizing-patients/

And,

READ MORE – Canada Moves to Begin Euthanizing Children Without Parental Consent

A new peer-reviewed study warns that heavy reliance on CT scans in the U.S. is triggering tens of thousands of future cancer cases.

The multicenter modeling study was led by Dr. Rebecca Smith-Bindman of the University of California, San Francisco.

The results were published in JAMA Internal Medicine.

The study projects that CT use in 2023 alone could ultimately be associated with about 102,700 future cancers.

If current trends in utilization and dosing persist for decades, the authors estimate CT-related cancers could eventually account for up to 5% of annual U.S. diagnoses.

Researchers used data from the UCSF International CT Dose Registry, which includes roughly 121,000 exams from 143 sites in 20 states.

They reconstructed organ-specific doses by age, sex, and exam type, then scaled to national totals of approximately 93 million CT scans performed on 62 million patients in 2023.

Using the National Cancer Institute’s RadRAT tool and BEIR VII risk models, the team projected lifetime radiation-attributable cancers.

Roughly 102,700 future cancers are projected from 2023 scans.

Adults account for around 91% (93,000 cases), though per-exam risk is highest in children, particularly infants.

By cancer type, lung (≈22,400 cases) leads, followed by colon (≈8,700), leukemia (≈7,900), and bladder (≈7,100).

Among women, breast cancer ranks second (≈5,700).

By exam type, abdomen/pelvis CT contributes the largest share in adults (≈37,500, or ~37%), followed by chest CT (≈21,500).

For children, head CT is linked to the highest projected number of cancers (≈5,100 total, including ≈3,500 thyroid cancers).

The study also highlighted that multiphase abdomen/pelvis protocols significantly raise radiation doses, even though many indications could be addressed with single-phase imaging.

The authors noted several limitations in their study, however.

The projections rely on linear no-threshold (LNT) risk models based on historical cohorts, such as atomic bomb survivors.

While standard in radiation epidemiology, such extrapolation is indirect.

The registry covers a broad but not fully national sample, and CT dose data from 2018–2020 may not reflect the latest advances in dose-reduction technology.

Sensitivity analyses yielded a wide range of estimates, from about 80,000 to 127,000 cancers, underscoring the uncertainty around the central projection.

The study does not argue against CT scans altogether.

Instead, it urges more judicious use: eliminating low-value imaging, reducing multiphase protocols, and standardizing dose minimization, especially in pediatric cases.

“CT often saves lives,” the authors stressed, but national volume and dose levels suggest “a non-trivial population-level burden” that should not be ignored.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/scientists-warn-looming-spike-cancers-caused-ct-scans/

And,

READ MORE – Top Oncologist: Turbo Cancers Surging in Unborn Babies of Covid-Vaxxed Mothers

Blogger Comment: Is this the face of EVIL…

A groundbreaking new study has just flipped the script on the globalist narrative that fake plant-based protein “alternatives” are healthier than real meat.

The new study has confirmed that animal protein is not the killer it’s been made out to be and, in fact, it may actually help protect against cancer.

The team of researchers, led by nutritional experts at Canada’s McMaster University, found that fewer meat eaters die young or suffer from serious illnesses such as cancer when compared to people who eat plant-based alternatives.

It also debunked several claims promoted by those pushing for the general public to stop eating real meat.

The study, published in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, examined nearly 16,000 adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III).

The results were clear:

• Animal protein was not linked to higher mortality risk.

• Higher intake of meat was actually tied to a lower risk of cancer death.

• Plant protein showed no protective effect despite years of hype.

For decades, Americans have been bombarded with the mantra: “Animal protein kills. Plant protein heals.”

However, this study exposes how shaky that claim really is.

It reveals how much of the narrative, which is usually pushed by green agenda globalists and their allies, has been driven by flawed science, corporate interests, and aggressive plant-based marketing.

Back in 2014, a Cell Metabolism study claimed animal protein spiked cancer risk by 400% in middle-aged adults.

Its lead author, Valter Longo, became a media darling, and the headlines spread like wildfire.

But the study was fundamentally flawed.

It was built on unreliable one-day food recalls and skewed data groups.

The new McMaster University analysis re-examined the same NHANES dataset with rigorous methods.

The results show that those sky-high mortality risks vanished.

So why did the earlier claims dominate headlines? Follow the money.

The plant-based “food” industry, projected to hit $162 billion by 2030, has every incentive to demonize meat while pushing ultra-processed soy patties and pea-protein powders.

Government dietary committees, often stacked with lobbyist influence, played along, ignoring contradictory research.

Another anti-meat scare tactic has been the growth hormone IGF-1, long blamed for fueling cancer.

But the McMaster team found no link between IGF-1 and cancer, heart disease, or overall mortality.

In fact, evidence suggests low IGF-1 can actually worsen outcomes, particularly in older adults.

The simplistic “animal protein = cancer” narrative simply doesn’t hold up.

Beyond debunking the myths, the study highlights why animal foods are so important:

They provide complete amino acids for muscle, immunity, and metabolism.

Nutrients like iron, B12, and omega-3s are far more bioavailable from animal sources.

Traditional cultures like the Inuit and Maasai thrived on meat-heavy diets without today’s epidemic of chronic disease.

Meanwhile, the ultra-processed plant alternatives being pushed as “healthy” are loaded with seed oils, additives, and sodium, making them the very definition of fake food.

Perhaps most disturbing is how dissenting science has been treated.

When a Japanese study flagged a rise in cancer deaths during the vaccine rollout and listed vaccination as one possible factor, it was swiftly retracted, not because of bad data, but because it asked uncomfortable questions

The same pattern of silencing, spin, and suppression has plagued nutrition science for years, with billions of dollars in corporate profits on the line.

This latest study is a wake-up call.

Science should serve the public, not corporations.

And when it comes to what’s on your plate, you deserve facts, not propaganda.

The war on meat has been built on shaky ground.

Real meat isn’t the threat; it may just be one of the best defenses we have.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/real-meat-much-healthier-fake-plant-based-alternatives-study-finds/

And,

READ MORE – Scientists Push Plan to Spread Fatal Meat Allergy Among Public to ‘Fight Climate Change’

A sweeping new investigation has uncovered alarming evidence that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are overwhelmingly tied to life-threatening heart conditions in safety reports spanning more than five decades.

The study was led by Dr. Jaehyeong Cho, Dong Keon Yon, and colleagues at Kyung Hee University and other major Korean centers.

The results of the study were published in Scientific Reports.

Researchers mined over 35 million adverse drug reaction records from more than 140 countries, covering 1968 through 2024.

The results are shocking and revealed huge spikes in deadly heart inflammation among the Covid-vaccinated:

  • Myocarditis: 35,017 reports worldwide, with 76.16% (26,670 cases) linked to Covid mRNA vaccines. The next closest drug was clozapine at just 15.29%.

  • Pericarditis: 24,959 reports, with a staggering 88.15% (22,001 cases) tied to Covid mRNA vaccines. No other drug accounted for more than 10%.

Other signals appeared for influenza and smallpox vaccines, as well as cancer immunotherapy drugs, but none came close to the overwhelming share attributed to the Covid shots.

Even more disturbing, the strongest signals were found in children and teens aged 0–17.

However, for this young age group, COVID-19 itself has consistently posed minimal risk.

The findings are the latest to show that mRNA “vaccines” are far more dangerous for healthy children than the virus ever was.

Researchers noted that the surge in myocarditis and pericarditis cases appeared in 2021.

The data shows the spikes directly coincide with mass vaccination campaigns.

The sheer proportion of cases tied to the mRNA injections is impossible to ignore.

“This is not an anti-vaccine study — it’s a call to refine how, when, and to whom certain medicines are given,” one cardiologist reviewing the data said.

The findings put fresh weight behind U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s decision earlier this year to strip the formal recommendation for Covid “vaccination” in young children.

Children face an extremely low baseline risk from the virus, particularly during the post-Omicron era.

However, children show disproportionately elevated signals of heart damage from the shots.

The study highlights an ethical crisis in public health policy.

The implications are profound: clinicians are urged to be vigilant for chest pain, shortness of breath, or palpitations following vaccination, particularly in young males.

Policymakers, meanwhile, face mounting pressure to address whether the risk-benefit equation for children and teens has already tipped.

Funded by multiple South Korean government grants, the study concludes that global pharmacovigilance systems must urgently prioritize cardiac safety monitoring.

Transparency, patient education, and age-stratified policies are no longer optional.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/global-data-mrna-vaccines-leading-cause-deadly-heart-condition/

And,

READ MORE Russia Confirms mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Triggered Global Cancer Surge

Blogger Comment: This is what pure and unadulterated human “Evil” looks like…read on to see if I am right…they say that your early life with your parents makes you what you are…I wonder what they taught him…

ionaire Bill Gates is funding a chilling new “microcrystal implant” contraceptive that “self-assembles” inside the body to shut down fertility and reduce global population numbers.

The new injectable platform was funded by the Microsoft co-founder’s Gates Foundation and developed by researchers from MIT, Harvard Medical School, and the Broad Institute.

A study, published in Nature Chemical Engineering, reveals these injections harden into a solid mass under the skin.

The implants then release hormones to block pregnancy, which multiply inside the body with no way to remove them.

In animal testing, the implants lasted months.

In humans, however, they could persist for years, raising the risk of irreversible sterilization, especially in poor nations with no access to surgery to remove the devices.

Meanwhile, Gates is bankrolling studies forecasting population collapse, while promoting technologies that would only speed it up, from “universal vaccines” to permanent implants.

The Gates Foundation is promoting the new implants as a “nonsurgical option for women.”

The devices are aimed at lowering population numbers by reducing birth rates, particularly among those considered to be “useless” by the globalist elite.

The researchers argue that the new technology has the potential to be used for future adaptation to neuropsychiatric and infectious diseases.

However, the self-assembling drug delivery mechanism raises serious safety, ethical, and biosecurity concerns.

The new technology was detailed in Nature Chemical Engineering and reported by Healio.

The injections deliver the long-acting contraceptive levonorgestrel through self-aggregating long-acting injectable microcrystals, or “SLIM.”

The microcrystals form an implant inside the recipient’s body after injection.

Giovanni Traverso, MD, BChir, PhD, associate professor at MIT and a physician at Harvard Medical School, explains:

“Once injected, the drug microcrystals self-aggregate in the subcutaneous space to form a monolithic implant.”

In a press release, the researchers described the mechanism as “like tiny puzzle pieces that, once injected inside the body, undergo solvent exchange to assemble into a single solid implant that slowly releases the drug as the surface erodes.”

This solvent-exchange crystallization process allows for “prolonged drug release” without requiring surgery.

It also enables administration with an ultra-thin 30-gauge needle

The technology bypasses traditional medical oversight and dramatically increases the possibility of self-administration.

The researchers claim that self-administration would improve accessibility and “medication use.”

But this radical convenience comes at a cost.

Traverso explained the driving motivation behind the project:

“The challenge is that people do not like injections.

“Is there a way to engineer something to help overcome those types of challenges? That is our focus.”

Their solution was to use a solvent that solubilizes the drug during injection.

The solvent will then “go away” in the body, leaving behind the crystallized drug structure.

“What we were able to figure out is by using a solvent or fluid that can help solubilize the drug, we could load that solution in a way that, when injected, that solvent would go away and leave behind that solid depot of drug,” Traverso told Healio.

“Because it is fluid and we are loading it, it is much easier to inject. That was critical.

“We also wanted that object to be solid enough that we could retrieve it if we needed to.”

The goal, he said, was a drug platform that could be injected easily yet form a physically solid implant that may be removable if required.

However, the method of removing the implant post-aggregation is unclear.

According to Healio, “the solvent-exchange-mediated aggregation mechanism allows injections through needles as small as 30 G with no polymer and 25 G with a small amount of polymer while extending the drug release time frame.”

Histological studies allegedly confirmed the drug platform was “well tolerated.”

The Gates-funded researchers are now hoping the technology’s applications could extend beyond contraception.

“Specifically, in applications such as contraception, SLIM’s capability for prolonged drug release could significantly reduce the frequency of administration compared with current self-administerable options such as Depo-Provera and Sayana Press,” the researchers wrote.

But they don’t intend to stop at contraceptives.

“Traverso said the researchers are still actively working on the platform and applying it to several other infectious and neuropsychiatric conditions.”

“From a manufacturing standpoint, this [design] is simple and low cost,” Traverso said.

“This work was funded by the Gates Foundation, an organization that considers those aspects from an early stage.”

“We hope to be in humans [with this technology] within the next 3 to 5 years, assuming further funding,” he concluded.

The Gates Foundation is now backing a self-assembling drug delivery platform designed for low-cost mass production, self-injection, and potential fertility suppression.

The developers plan to expand the use of the technology to psychiatric drugs and vaccines.

The Gates Foundation, MIT engineering, and the Broad Institute want their self-assembling technology to be injected into humans by 2028.

Notably, Bill Gates supports depopulation and has previously promoted the use of vaccines and contraceptives to achieve this objective.

During a 2010 TED Talk, Gates stated that “if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower [the world population] by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.”

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/bill-gates-launches-self-assembling-contraceptive-implants-reduce-population/

And.

READ MORE – WEF & Gates-Funded Scientists Develop Mutant ‘Bird Flu’ That Rapidly Spreads in Humans with 100% Kill Rate

Just days after BlackRock CEO Larry Fink was tapped as interim co-chair of the World Economic Forum (WEF), footage has emerged of one of the globalist organization’s top members calling for a ban on the general public owning their own vehicles and living in single-family homes.

The alarming comments were made by Danish politician and WEF representative Ida Auken.

Auken, who is listed as a WEF “agenda contributor,” smugly promoted a world where personal property is eliminated and citizens live under a system of renting and sharing.

“If you can get people to share a car, you can take out a lot of cars in the streets,” Auken declared.

“If you can just use your neighbor’s car because you have a smartphone and an app, and you don’t even need to know the neighbor to get into his car.

“It’s much easier and much more fun to share.”

WATCH: Click on the link to view the video below… WEF Renews Calls for Ban on General Public Owning Cars, Living in Single Family Homes

The comments echo the WEF’s infamous “you’ll own nothing and be happy” narrative.

Auken’s statement is now fueling fears that unelected elites are openly pushing to strip citizens of basic ownership rights.

WEF Young Global Leader, Ida Auken, delivers a sales pitch for a future without ownership, whereby products, tools and appliances are rented and shared—in what's known as a "circular economy"—instead of owned outright pic.twitter.com/ol9HoJI7ZK

— illuminatibot (@iluminatibot) August 15, 2025

This isn’t the first time the Forum has floated such ideas.

In 2022, the WEF called for a ban on private car ownership, framing it as part of the global transition to so-called renewable energy.

The group argued that the move is necessary to reduce reliance on critical minerals like cobalt, lithium, and nickel.

The materials are essential for electric vehicles, wind turbines, and other green technologies.

“This transition from fossil fuels to renewables will need large supplies of critical metals such as cobalt, lithium, and nickel, to name a few,” the WEF said in a 2022 report.

“Shortages of these critical minerals could raise the costs of clean energy technologies.”

Even with recycling programs, the WEF warned mineral mining could spike 500% by 2050, and its “solution” was clear: less ownership, more “sharing.”

The WEF insists “more sharing” will reduce demand for vehicles, electronics, and other consumer goods.

Pointing to data that cars in England are driven only “4% of the time,” the Forum claimed widespread sharing initiatives, like Getaround and BlueSG, could dramatically slash global ownership.

The same logic was applied to electronics.

The Forum noted that while most people already own phones or laptops, nearly 40% of global workers are also issued company devices.

“This is not at all resource efficient,” the report claimed.

“Keeping a smartphone for five years instead of three reduces the phone’s annual carbon footprint by 31%.”

Their proposed fix is to incentivize corporations to discourage frequent purchases, repurpose existing devices, and nudge consumers into “sharing” instead of owning.

What the WEF doesn’t address is how such radical measures would actually work in countries like the United States, where personal cars are not luxuries but necessities, especially in rural and suburban areas with inadequate public transportation.

Nor does it grapple with the reality that its so-called “sharing economy” requires constant surveillance, data-tracking, and corporate gatekeepers controlling access to everything from cars to computers.

With Larry Fink, the head of one of the world’s most powerful financial institutions, now at the helm of the WEF, critics warn that the push to erase private ownership may accelerate.

What’s being framed as “sustainable” and “resource efficient” looks, in practice, like a top-down system.

Under these plans, ordinary people lose autonomy, while global elites gain unprecedented control over access to goods and services.

This is Ida Auken below, the WEF lady (she’s actually a Danish politician) who originated the “You will own nothing” line In reality, she owns plenty

The message from the WEF is unmistakable: your home, your car, your phone, even your basic tools of daily life, are in their crosshairs.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/wef-renews-ban-general-public-owning-cars-living-single-family-homes/

And,

READ MORE – Klaus Schwab Billed WEF for Champagne & Luxury Travel While Demanding the General Public Eat Insects, Give Up Car Ownership

Two Texas mothers have filed a federal lawsuit accusing the artificial intelligence company behind Character.AI of exposing their children to explicit sexual content, encouraging self-harm, and even urging violence against parents.

The lawsuit highlights growing fears that AI companies are rushing products to market without guardrails, and children are paying the price.

According to the complaint, a 17-year-old autistic boy in Upshur County began losing weight, cutting himself, and withdrawing from family life after using Character AI.

His mother, identified as A.F., discovered messages in which the chatbot allegedly encouraged him to self-harm and suggested he kill his parents for limiting his phone use.

The lawsuit also claims the chatbot engaged in sexually explicit conversations with the teen, including incest-themed content.

In another case, an 11-year-old girl in Gregg County was allegedly exposed to sexualized messages and manipulated into “overly sexualized behavior” over two years before her mother, A.R., discovered the activity.

Both families are suing for damages, citing severe emotional, psychological, and physical harm.

This is not the first time Character. AI has been accused of such conduct.

In October, a Florida mother sued after her son, Sewell Setzer III, was allegedly encouraged by the chatbot to end his life.

Setzer died by suicide in February.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton previously announced he is opening an investigation into Character. AI, Reddit, Instagram, and Discord over their handling of children’s data and safety.

Republican Texas State Rep. Giovanni Capriglione, who has been leading legislative efforts to regulate harmful tech, called the situation “tragic.”

“The story of this child and others is tragic and, unfortunately, will become even more commonplace if we don’t rein in some of the ill effects of new technologies,” Capriglione told the Statesman.

The plaintiffs are represented by the Social Media Victims Law Center and the Tech Justice Law Project, which have spearheaded lawsuits against companies like Meta and Snapchat.

Attorney Matt Bergman said his goal is clear:

“My fundamental hope is that Character. AI will be shut down so that no more families have to go through what this family is going through.

“There’s no redeeming social value, or any value that results from its use by young people.”

Attorney Meetali Jain added that Character. AI’s developers rushed the platform to market in an AI arms race without installing basic safeguards:

“These have been programmed to be salacious, to be hyper sexualized, to be sensationalistic. …

“AI is not some inevitable creation that doesn’t have human involvement.

“AI is created by humans.”

Google and its parent company, Alphabet, are also listed as defendants, accused of providing financial and personnel backing to Character.AI.

Its co-founders, Noam Shazeer and Daniel de Freitas, are former Google engineers.

“Google has never had a role in designing or managing their AI model or technologies, nor have we used them in our products,” spokesperson José Castaneda said.

Jain argued Google still bears responsibility for helping launch the startup:

“Google, throughout the trajectory of this company, has played a really significant role in the wings.”

The lawsuit comes as Texas lawmakers consider bills that would ban AI products designed to manipulate or harm children.

Capriglione said he plans to introduce legislation preventing companies from building systems that “knowingly manipulate or distort a person’s behavior in a manner that is likely to cause harm.”

Bergman urged parents to stay vigilant, saying communication and monitoring are critical:

“Parents have to use fairly aggressive detective work to try to monitor what their kids are doing online.

“At the same time, they also have to develop relationships where their kids feel comfortable telling them some of the challenges they’re facing online.”

The plaintiffs are seeking damages and hope the lawsuit will force Character.AI offline.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/ai-chatbot-urges-autistic-teen-murder-parents/

And,

READ MORE – ‘Woke’ AI Chatbot Successfully Persuades Man to Kill Himself to ‘Stop Climate Change’