-
Pfizer’s Birth Control Injection Triggers Surge in Brain Tumors
A major new study has found that Pfizer’s popular birth control injection Depo-Provera has triggered surges in deadly and disabling brain tumors among healthy women who received the jab.
The alarming finding confirms long-standing concerns that the pharmaceutical giant allegedly ignored for decades.
The research was led by leading scientists at the Cleveland Clinic and Case Western Reserve University.
Their findings were published in JAMA Neurology.
During the massive study, the researchers analyzed over 61 million U.S. medical records spanning twenty years.
The findings reveal that women using Depo-Provera, also known as depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), were 2.4 times more likely to develop meningioma, a slow-growing but disabling and potentially life-threatening brain tumor.
Millions Exposed, Risks Hidden
Depo-Provera has been marketed for decades as a convenient, long-acting contraceptive.
It is used by roughly one in four sexually active American women.
But the study found that risk was particularly high among women who began using the injections after age 31 or stayed on the drug for more than four years.
In addition, a French study published in The British Medical Journal (BMJ) found that women who used Depo-Provera for over a year had a 5.6 times greater risk of developing a meningioma.
While meningiomas are typically classified as “benign,” their growth can compress the brain, causing vision problems, seizures, cognitive decline, paralysis, and even death if it grows large enough.
Despite these dangers, Pfizer never warned women of the potential tumor link, even as early evidence accumulated for years.
Decades of Warnings Ignored
Court documents reveal that concerns about synthetic hormones and brain tumor growth date back to the 1980s, yet Pfizer pushed Depo-Provera forward for approval.
The FDA repeatedly rejected the contraceptive for nearly four decades due to cancer-related concerns before finally authorizing it in 1992.
When approval came, the agency required only a “black box” warning for bone density loss, but no mention of brain tumors.
More than 1,000 women have now filed over 1,200 lawsuits against Pfizer, alleging that the company concealed tumor risks and misled the public.
“These women all have meningiomas,” Ellen Relkin, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, told NBC News.
“Many have surgery, some have radiation, and they’ve all had their lives greatly impacted.”
WATCH: Follow the link to view the video below… Pfizer’s Birth Control Injection Triggers Surge in Brain Tumors
FDA and Pfizer Deflect Blame
In 2023, Pfizer quietly told regulators that new data “suggested” a possible link between Depo-Provera and meningioma.
However, the company dismissed the findings as “inconclusive.”
Pfizer later argued in court that it had asked the FDA to update the warning label, implying that any missing warnings were the agency’s fault.
The FDA, for its part, reportedly refused the change, claiming the evidence didn’t meet its threshold for an official warning.
That decision has drawn new scrutiny of both Pfizer and federal health regulators, who critics say continue to protect corporate interests over patient safety.
One in Every 1,152 Women at Risk
According to the JAMA analysis, the “number needed to harm” is 1,152, meaning that for every 1,152 women who receive Depo-Provera, one is expected to develop a brain tumor as a result.
When scaled across millions of users, the potential toll is staggering.
A Pattern of Profits Over Patients
Pfizer’s handling of Depo-Provera follows a now-familiar pattern: early warnings ignored, risks minimized, and profits prioritized.
From hormone-based products to mRNA injections, the same story repeats as regulators downplay red flags while millions are exposed.
As the lawsuits mount, researchers say the findings raise urgent questions not just about Pfizer’s transparency, but about the entire system of drug oversight that allowed a known hormonal risk to go unaddressed for decades.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/pfizers-birth-control-injection-triggers-surge-brain-tumors/
And,
-
Scientists Confirm Moderna mRNA ‘Vaccine’ Makes Hidden Changes to Heart
Blogger Comment: Moderna is a Gates’s created company if you did not know it, in front and behind the curtain where it had never done anything at all in Pharma before until Gates came across them as a vessel concern…so how did they con the American people into taking this experimental jab, where Moderna and Gates made billions together …the latter in offshore entities…
.
A newly published peer-reviewed study has confirmed that Moderna’s mRNA COVID-19 injection alters the heart and blood vessels, revealing measurable changes in cardiovascular function that standard medical tests fail to detect.
The research, published in the European Journal of Pharmacology by Dr. Chun-Chao Chen and his team at Taipei Medical University, shows that the Moderna mRNA-1273 shot can cause subtle but detectable stiffness in blood vessels, suggesting hidden, vaccine-induced stress on the cardiovascular system.
Study Overview
Chen’s team analyzed the arterial pulse of 203 adults who received Moderna’s COVID shot at Shuang-Ho Hospital in Taiwan.
Using advanced noninvasive sensors, researchers recorded one-minute readings of each participant’s radial artery pulse both before and after vaccination.
Participants were grouped based on their post-vaccination experience:
- No side effects (n = 18)
- Cardiac side effects (n = 45)
- Vascular side effects (n = 68)
- Combined cardiac/vascular side effects (n = 72)
The scientists then applied two different analysis methods, a self-developed Pulse Distribution Analysis (PDA) and a machine-learning classifier, to extract 40 harmonic indices measuring amplitude, phase, and variability in blood flow.
Findings: “Transient but Measurable Vascular Stiffness”
According to the study, multiple spectral indices of the arterial pulse shifted significantly after Moderna vaccination, indicating changes in vascular elasticity and stiffness.
The research team found that their PDA technique achieved an AUC of 0.76, outperforming the machine-learning model in identifying participants who suffered cardiac or vascular side effects.
In simple terms, Moderna’s shot appears to temporarily alter the natural rhythm and flexibility of the cardiovascular system.
These subtle effects would never be detected by standard clinical exams.
The authors concluded that while the changes seem transient, the findings confirm that mRNA vaccines can subtly influence vascular tone and cardiac performance, particularly in individuals who experience side effects after vaccination.
Implications: Hidden Stress on the Heart
While the study stops short of proving long-term harm, it reinforces growing evidence that mRNA injections trigger measurable physiological reactions in the heart and blood vessels.
These effects cannot be dismissed as a coincidence.
The researchers described their approach as a “noninvasive biomarker” for detecting early cardiovascular stress or microvascular response following immunization, a potential tool for real-time monitoring of vaccine safety.
The authors disclosed no conflicts of interest, and funding came from the Taiwanese Ministry of Science and Technology and Taipei Medical University, confirming the research was government-supported but academically independent.
What It Means
Dr. Chen’s study opens a new frontier in post-vaccine cardiovascular science, showing that the human pulse itself can reveal wAs Chen and colleagues note, “significant post-vaccination changes were observed in multiple spectral indices of the arterial pulse,” highlighting that the mRNA-1273 shot produces “transient but measurable vascular stiffness.”
While health officials continue to insist the mRNA products are “safe and effective,” this study adds to a growing body of research indicating that the shots can subtly alter cardiovascular physiology, raising new questions about long-term safety and risk in sensitive individuals.hat lab tests and public health agencies have overlooked.
As Chen and colleagues note, “significant post-vaccination changes were observed in multiple spectral indices of the arterial pulse,” highlighting that the mRNA-1273 shot produces “transient but measurable vascular stiffness.”
While health officials continue to insist the mRNA products are “safe and effective,” this study adds to a growing body of research indicating that the shots can subtly alter cardiovascular physiology, raising new questions about long-term safety and risk in sensitive individuals.
The findings arrive amid ongoing legal, regulatory, and scientific scrutiny of mRNA technologies, with increasing calls for transparency, informed consent, and post-market safety monitoring using modern digital health tools.
For now, the study stands as a warning, and a window into what scientists are finally beginning to measure: the real biological changes in the human heart after mRNA exposure.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/scientists-moderna-mrna-vaccine-makes-hidden-changes-heart/
And,
-
Florida Sounds Alarm Over Plot to Spread Deadly Meat Allergy Among Public to ‘Fight Climate Change’
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is raising the alarm after uncovering a chilling globalist plot to spread a fatal meat allergy among the general public to supposedly “fight climate change.”
DeSantis has denounced what he calls a “deranged” global agenda to genetically engineer people to develop a red meat allergy.
The Republican governor linked the plan to the World Economic Forum (WEF) and United Nations (UN), both of which are pushing to eliminate traditional diets and control the food supply in the name of “saving the planet.”
DeSantis’s comments came after resurfaced footage showed a New York University bioethicist proposing that humans could be intentionally engineered to become allergic to meat to reduce consumption and fight climate change.
“Genetically engineering humans to become allergic to meat because some elites think people eat ‘too much’ of it is insane,” DeSantis posted on X.
“Human Engineering” to End Meat Consumption
In the 2016 video, Dr. Matthew Liao, director of the NYU Center for Bioethics, told a live audience that ticks could be used to induce an allergy to red meat.
This same idea is echoed by other global bioethicists.
“People eat too much meat,” Liao said.
“And if they were to cut down on their consumption of meat, then it would actually really help the planet.”
“There’s this thing called the lone star tick, where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat.
“So, that’s something we can do through human engineering.”
WATCH: Follow the link to view the video below… WEF Bioethicist Pushes Plan to Spread Deadly Meat Allergy Among Public to ‘Fight Climate Chang
DeSantis blasted the comments as a warning sign of how far unelected global bodies and academic elites are willing to go in pursuit of climate ideology.
“This is an example of why entities like the WEF and WHO are persona non grata in Florida,” he wrote.
Globalist Push to Control Diets
In that talk, Liao said: “Just as some people are naturally intolerant to milk or crayfish, like myself, we could artificially induce mild intolerance to meat by stimulating our immune system against common bovine proteins.”
Sayer Ji, chairman of the Global Wellness Forum and founder of GreenMedInfo, said DeSantis is right to call out the underlying agenda.
“This isn’t dietary advice — it’s social engineering,” Ji said.
“Unelected global organizations have no business dictating what free people eat, especially when they’re demonizing traditional foods that have sustained human health for millennia.”
Scientists Float “Moral Obligation” to Spread Meat Allergy
Adding to the controversy, a recent paper published in the journal Bioethics proposed using the lone star tick to spread alpha-gal syndrome (AGS).
AGS is a condition that triggers a severe red meat allergy.
The authors, Dr. Parker Crutchfield and Dr. Blake Hereth of Western Michigan University, argued that if eating meat is “morally impermissible,” then preventing the spread of AGS would also be morally wrong.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), bites from the lone star tick inject a sugar molecule called alpha-gal into the bloodstream, leading to an allergic reaction to red meat that can cause life-threatening anaphylaxis.
Critics say even framing the idea as a “thought experiment” shows how radical modern bioethics has become.
“Calling it a ‘thought experiment’ doesn’t make it any less disturbing,” said Kendall Mackintosh, a board-certified nutrition specialist.
“The suggestion of using ticks or any biological vector to intentionally spread an allergy is beyond unethical. It’s dangerous, unpredictable, and medically reckless.”
Ji warned that the concept goes far beyond diet.
“This is about whether human beings retain sovereignty over their own bodies, or whether that sovereignty can be overridden by those who believe they know better,” he said.
“The answer to that question will determine whether we remain free.”
DeSantis Pushes Back Against “Lab-Grown Meat” Agenda
DeSantis has repeatedly pushed back against efforts to replace natural meat with synthetic or insect-based alternatives promoted by the WEF.
Last year, he signed a law banning lab-grown meat in Florida, describing it as a stand against “the global elite’s plan to force the world to eat meat grown in a petri dish or bugs to achieve their authoritarian goals.”
“Florida is fighting back,” he said at the time.
To view X PostTweet below, click on the following link… https://t.co/mMZl2n30bn
And, Florida rejects World Economic Forum invitation due to stark opposition to globalist policies https://flvoicenews.com/florida-rejects-world-economic-forum-invitation-due-to-stark-con/
Mackintosh said the push for “alternative” meats is driven by corporate profit, not sustainability.
“The biggest winners in the lab-grown meat push are large food conglomerates, biotech companies, and venture capital investors who own the patents and production technology,” she explained.
“Small farmers and ranchers — the backbone of our food system — lose.
“This is about creating dependence, not sustainability.”
Ji agreed, saying, “Follow the money.
“Biotech corporations and their investors stand to profit massively from patents and market control.”
WEF’s “One Burger Per Week” Vision
The World Economic Forum has repeatedly called for slashing red meat consumption, promoting “alternative proteins” as the path to a sustainable planet.
In a 2019 video, the WEF suggested that in the future, individuals would be limited to “one beef burger, two portions of fish, and one or two eggs per week.”
A WEF white paper published the same year called for “a transformation in the global system for protein provision,” and subsequent articles touted lab-grown meat as a climate solution that “eliminates the need to farm animals for food.”
Meanwhile, Bill Gates, a major WEF partner, has invested heavily in “alternative protein” ventures like Beyond Meat.
– Advertisement –
In his 2021 book “How to Avoid a Climate Disaster,” Gates argued that wealthy nations should switch entirely to synthetic “beef.”
But as sales collapse and consumers reject fake meat, critics say the agenda is failing.
“The War on Meat Is About Control”
Ji said the deeper agenda behind “meat-free” campaigns has little to do with the environment.
“The war on meat has never been about climate,” he said.
“It’s about control — consolidating food production under centralized, patented, technology-dependent systems.
“Meat represents everything the global technocracy fears: decentralized production, nutritional independence, and cultural traditions that resist standardization.
“When people can raise their own food, they’re harder to control.”
As DeSantis put it bluntly:
“The notion that cattle are destroying the planet has always been ridiculous.”
For many Americans, the governor’s message resonates as more evidence emerges that the same institutions pushing lab-grown foods are also entertaining ideas of engineering humanity itself, one “ethics” paper at a time.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/florida-sounds-alarm-over-plot-to-spread-deadly-meat-allergy-among-public-to-fight-climate-change/
And,
READ MORE – Scientists Confirm Moderna mRNA ‘Vaccine’ Makes Hidden Changes to Heart
-
Canadian Doctors Ramp Up Pressure to Euthanize More Disabled Patients
Government-funded doctors in Canada are increasingly pressuring disabled patients to “choose” euthanasia instead of long-term care, according to explosive new testimony before Parliament.
Krista Carr, CEO of a national disability rights organization called Inclusion Canada, revealed that Canadians with disabilities are being urged to “choose” Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD).
Many disabled patients and their families are complaining that they are being bullied into “assisted suicide” instead of receiving long-term treatment or financial support.
As Slay News previously reported, Canada’s socialized healthcare system is now saving tens of millions of dollars per year by euthanizing patients instead of treating them.
Carr testified before the Parliamentary Finance Committee on October 8, warning lawmakers that Canada’s radical expansion of euthanasia laws has turned the country’s healthcare system into a pipeline to premature death.
“Since the bill was brought in around Track 2 MAID … that has certainly changed people’s interactions with the healthcare system,” Carr said, referring to the 2021 expansion that legalized assisted suicide for those who are chronically ill but not terminally ill.
“People with disabilities are now very much afraid in many circumstances to show up in the health care system with regular health concerns,” she explained. “Because often MAID is suggested as a solution to what is considered to be intolerable suffering.”
When asked by Conservative MP Garnett Genuis how often this occurs, Carr said it happens “weekly.”
WATCH:
Disabled and Poor Canadians Targeted
Carr warned that poverty itself is being treated as a reason to die, noting that the system now considers financial hardship “intolerable suffering,” which is a vague legal justification for euthanasia under Canada’s MAiD framework.
Many homeless, poor, or depressed Canadians have been euthanized after being classified by the government as experiencing “intolerable suffering.”
Carr’s remarks echo internal Ontario medical records released in 2024 showing that surging numbers of people were euthanized not because of terminal illness but because they were poor, disabled, or lonely.
In one case, an injured middle-aged worker who could no longer support himself reportedly chose MAiD after telling doctors that he wanted to live, but inadequate government assistance left him with “no choice.”
Another case involved an obese woman who said she felt like a “useless body taking up space.”
A doctor approved her death, arguing obesity qualified as a “grievous and irremediable” condition.
According to Ontario’s chief coroner, 116 of the province’s 4,528 euthanasia deaths in 2023 involved non-terminal patients, and more than three-quarters of those euthanized had been receiving disability benefits.
Nearly 30% of all non-terminal MAiD deaths came from the poorest neighborhoods, even though only 20% of Ontarians live in those areas.
Canada’s Euthanasia Program Expands Rapidly
Under the Liberal government, Canada has expanded its euthanasia program 13-fold since it was first legalized.
The skyrocketing number of cases makes the nation the fastest-growing euthanasia regime in the world.
Today, MAiD is the sixth leading cause of death in Canada, though it is deliberately omitted from official mortality statistics.
Asked why, Statistics Canada said it lists only the underlying illnesses that led to euthanasia, not euthanasia itself, as the cause of death, effectively concealing the scale of the program.
According to Health Canada, at least 13,241 Canadians died by lethal injection in 2022 alone, representing 4.1% of all deaths, marking a 31% increase from the previous year.
Meanwhile, average wait times for medical care have climbed to 27.7 weeks, leaving thousands without timely treatment.
Reports have surfaced of doctors calling elderly or disabled patients “selfish” for refusing euthanasia and continuing to seek care.
“Death Instead of Help”
Carr said that the normalization of euthanasia for the poor and disabled represents a horrifying betrayal of Canada’s most vulnerable citizens.
“What began as a policy of ‘mercy’ has turned into a system where people are being told they’re better off dead than disabled or in debt,” she warned.
Critics say the MAiD expansion reflects a disturbing cultural shift, one that treats human life as a burden on the state rather than a value to protect.
As the Canadian government continues to broaden eligibility for assisted death, including for those with mental illness, advocates are sounding the alarm:
Canada’s healthcare system, they say, has crossed the line from compassion to coercion.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-doctors-ramp-up-pressure-euthanize-more-disabled-patients/
And,
READ MORE – Healthy Father Euthanized Alongside Wife in Washington State
And,
Canadian Government Has Now Euthanized 90,000 Citizens with ‘Assisted Suicide’ Program
-
Study Links Bill Gates’ Fake ‘Meat’ to Depression Spike
Blogger Comment: This Blog faollows on very nicely and ties into the Eugenics drive by the Globalists where Gates is one of the main antagonists of mass Eugenics worldwide, where he was indoctrinated by his mother and father from being a child and where Gates really gets it from and why he’s really like he is , is like he is, as they where debatably, the USA’s top supporters of killing off people who…well were not like them…read what has been going on in Canada since 2016 if you don’t know and where as WEF controlled nation, over 90,000 people have been Euthanized in a mere 8years+ and where in 2015 and before there were NONE, as it was a criminal crime and was illegal…
A major new study has found that Bill Gates–backed fake “meat” products are linked to a sharp rise in depression, raising fresh concerns about the billionaire’s global campaign to replace real food with synthetic “alternatives.”
The study confirmed that hyperprocessed fake “meats” caused dangerous levels of inflammation in the brain, leading to severe neurological disorders that can trigger suicidal feelings.
As plant-based diets have gained traction, Gates and his network of globalist “green” investors have poured billions into ultraprocessed lab-grown “meat,” insect-based proteins, and genetically engineered fake “beef” and “chicken,” marketing them as sustainable solutions to “save the planet” from “climate change.”
But new research suggests these products may be doing serious harm to both mental and physical health, all while advancing Gates’s long-term agenda to centralize control over the global food system.
Using data from the UK Biobank cohort, scientists compared health markers among vegetarians who regularly ate plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) with those who didn’t.
The study, led by Professor Hana F. Navratilova, was conducted by a team of leading bioscientists at the University of Surrey in the UK.
Their paper was published in the scientific journal Food Frontiers.
The findings were alarming:
Those who consumed PBMAs faced a staggering 42% higher risk of depression.
They also showed elevated blood pressure and higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, which are key markers of inflammation.
Even though overall nutrient intake, including sodium, sugar, and fat, was similar between groups, the plant-based meat eaters displayed different immune and metabolic responses, suggesting the damage wasn’t just nutritional but biochemical.
Researchers pointed to the ultraprocessed nature of these lab-created products as a likely cause.
They noted that these “alternative food” products were filled with industrial additives, emulsifiers, and preservatives.
The Gut-Brain Connection
Experts say these findings may trace back to the gut-brain axis, the vital communication network linking gut health to mood and mental function.
Highly processed plant proteins and synthetic additives can disrupt the gut microbiome, triggering chronic inflammation and overactivation of immune pathways that influence the brain.
This low-grade inflammation, marked by high CRP, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and TNF-α, is now understood to contribute to neuroinflammation.
Neuroinflammation is a key driver of depression and anxiety.
In other words, Gates’s lab-engineered “meat” products may not just be unnatural, but they are also chemically altering mood and brain health.
Gates’s Global Food Agenda
This study adds to growing concerns about Bill Gates’s quiet monopoly over global agriculture and food production.
Through investments in companies like Impossible Foods, Beyond Meat, and multiple lab-grown meat startups, Gates has been working to replace traditional farming with synthetic food systems that rely on patented ingredients and industrial processing.
As Slay News has previously reported, Gates has bought up more than 270,000 acres of U.S. farmland, making him the nation’s largest private farmland owner.
At the same time, he has publicly called for Western nations to stop eating real beef and switch to “synthetic alternatives.”
“You can get used to the taste difference, and the claim is they’re going to make it taste even better over time,” Gates said in 2021 while promoting lab-grown meat for climate goals.
Critics argue the move has nothing to do with saving the planet and everything to do with controlling who produces, sells, and eats real food.
By pushing fake meat, Gates and his globalist allies in the World Economic Forum (WEF) are creating a food supply dependent on intellectual property and central regulation.
As such, they are effectively locking small farmers and consumers out of the system.
Hidden Health Costs of “Climate-Friendly” Foods
Studies have already shown that these synthetic products contain high levels of seed oils, chemical flavor enhancers, and isolated soy proteins, which can spike inflammation and disrupt hormones.
Meanwhile, real animal proteins, from pasture-raised eggs and grass-fed beef to wild-caught fish, continue to offer superior nutrient profiles that support brain health, energy, and immune function.
The Bigger Picture
This isn’t just about fake “meat,” it’s about the global transformation of food.
By controlling farmland, funding insect-protein factories, and lobbying for climate regulations that punish ranchers and farmers, Gates and his coconspirators are moving toward a post-agriculture economy where the public is dependent on corporate-engineered food.
While synthetic “meat” is marketed as an ethical or environmental choice, the growing body of evidence paints a darker reality: it’s a processed product that damages the body, weakens the mind, and serves elite control rather than public health.
The science is clear, however, and shows that real food from the Earth nourishes life.
Gates’s fake “meat” may just be the latest globalist experiment with devastating consequences.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/study-links-bill-gates-fake-meat-depression-spike/
And,
And,
Canadian Government Has Now Euthanized 90,000 Citizens with ‘Assisted Suicide’ Program https://world-freedom.co.uk/2025/10/19/canadian-government-has-now-euthanized-90000-citizens-with-assisted-suicide-program/
-
House Oversight Committee Releases Epstein Flight Records and Acosta Transcript
Newly released documents from the House Oversight Committee are pulling back the curtain on Jeffrey Epstein’s shadowy world.
The details are as murky as a swamp on a moonless night.
The committee dropped a bombshell release of flight manifests from Epstein’s private jet alongside a transcript of a late September interview with former U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta.
Acosta brokered the infamous 2008 plea deal for the disgraced financier, Fox News reported.
In 2008, Acosta, then-U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, negotiated a deal that saw Epstein serve just 13 months in jail, register as a sex offender, and pay restitution to victims instead of facing federal charges.
However, Epstein was granted work release and only spent nights in prison.
During these work release periods, Epstein was able to continue abusing victims.
Acosta claimed the case had serious flaws, with many victims unwilling to testify and others offering inconsistent accounts, which could have torpedoed a trial.
“Many victims refused to testify. Many victims had changing stories,” Acosta told the committee, painting a picture of a prosecution on shaky ground.
Yet, while Acosta’s concerns about a weak case may hold water, it’s hard to ignore how this deal let a billionaire skirt the full weight of justice, sending a troubling message about who gets a pass in our system.
Fast forward to the latest release, and those flight manifests are raising eyebrows with names like Prince Andrew, Bill Gates, Walter Cronkite, Richard Branson, and even former President Bill Clinton, who flew multiple times, including a 2002 trip with Secret Service in tow.
The optics aren’t great as they reveal powerful elites hobnobbing with a predator like Epstein.
The issue has long been fueling public skepticism about elite circles and their accountability, a concern that resonates deeply with those fed up with two-tiered justice.
During the interview, Acosta didn’t shy away from defending his 2008 decision.
He argues it was better than the alternative of Epstein walking free, which he claimed Florida’s state attorney was ready to allow.
“Simply put, the Palm Beach state attorney’s office was ready to let Epstein walk free, no jail time,” Acosta insisted, framing his plea deal as a necessary compromise to ensure some punishment.
Call it pragmatism or a cop-out, but Acosta’s stance highlights a frustrating reality: sometimes the system’s flaws force prosecutors into deals that leave a bitter taste, especially when a billionaire’s resources can tilt the scales.
Acosta also took a swipe at Epstein’s defense team.
He is alleging they danced dangerously close to unethical behavior, though he emphasized he pushed back against their tactics.
Looking back as U.S. Secretary of Labor in 2019, Acosta acknowledged the cultural shift in how victims are treated, admitting that today’s standards might have led to a different outcome in handling such a high-profile case.
While it’s refreshing to hear some reflection, it’s cold comfort for those who see the Epstein saga as a glaring example of how wealth and influence can undermine justice, a sentiment that fuels distrust in institutions and skepticism of progressive narratives about systemic fairness.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/house-oversight-committee-releases-epstein-flight-records-acosta-transcript/
And,
READ MORE – Prince Andrew Forced to Give Up Royal Titles, Including ‘Duke of York’
-
Trump Drops the Hammer on UN’s Global ‘Climate Tax’
Blogger Comment: Like him or loathe him, Trump’s previous decision on the UN’s crazy ‘Climate Tax’ and where he knows the whole thing is a complete scam (Co2 only accounts for only 0.04% in our atmosphere according to the UN figures if you look, and has been that for 100s of thousands of years) to make continual $ trillions for “NO PURPOSE” whatsoever for the Globalists deep pockets…as it’s one of the biggest ever cons on Humanity…period
.
President Donald Trump has just dealt a devastating blow to the globalist green agenda and is standing firm against a proposed global “climate tax” being advanced by the United Nations.
The scheme, linked International Maritime Organization (IMO), is part of a UN deal to supposedly cut “global shipping emissions.”
However, Trump blasted the scheme as a “Global Green New Scam Tax” that would punish consumers and surrender U.S. sovereignty to global bureaucrats.
In a post on Truth Social, President Trump said he was “outraged” by the proposal, which aims to force the global shipping industry to hit so-called “Net Zero” emissions by 2050.
“I am outraged that the International Maritime Organization is voting in London this week to pass a global Carbon Tax,” Trump said, urging nations to reject the measure.
“The United States will NOT stand for this Global Green New Scam Tax on Shipping, and will not adhere to it in any way, shape, or form.
“We will not tolerate increased prices on American Consumers OR the creation of a Green New Scam Bureaucracy to spend YOUR money on their Green dreams.”
Global Bureaucrats Target U.S. Shipping and Consumers
The new policy would require large oceangoing vessels, those weighing over 5,000 tons, to comply with strict global fuel standards and emissions limits.
Critics warn it amounts to a global carbon tax, effectively forcing American industries and consumers to pay for an unelected foreign body’s climate agenda.
The Trump administration announced its opposition last weekend in a joint statement from four top Cabinet officials: Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Energy Chris Wright, and Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy.
“Under this framework, ships would have to pay fees for failing to meet unattainable fuel standards and emissions targets,” the statement read.
“These fees will drive up energy and transportation, and leisure cruise costs.”
The secretaries condemned the proposal as a direct assault on U.S. interests, warning it would cripple supply chains, raise prices, and expand global climate bureaucracy.
“Our fellow IMO members should be on notice that we will look for their support against this action and not hesitate to retaliate or explore remedies for our citizens should this endeavor fail,” they wrote.
Global Push for Control
The IMO, which operates under the United Nations umbrella, has 176 member states.
If consensus is not reached, the plan will go to a formal vote, where it would need approval from two-thirds of the 108 nations that previously ratified the organization’s pollution-reduction framework.
If passed, the new regulation would take effect in 2027, marking the first time a global entity imposed greenhouse gas pricing and emission limits across an entire industry.
Trump Draws the Line
Trump’s statement signals a clear warning to globalist institutions seeking to bypass national governments through environmental mandates.
The president made it clear that under his administration, the United States will not bow to international climate taxes or bureaucratic control.
With his message to the IMO, Trump reaffirmed a core principle of his America First agenda.
That agenda asserts that U.S. energy policy and economic sovereignty will never be dictated by foreign elites or the United Nations’ “climate” agenda.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/trump-drops-hammer-un-global-climate-tax/
And,
READ MORE – Trump: ‘Climate Change Is the Greatest Con Job Ever Perpetrated’
-
Scientists Sound Alarm: Global Excess Deaths Driven by ‘Dual Bioweapons’ of Covid & mRNA Shots
Scientists are sounding the alarm to warn the public that mRNA “vaccines” and COVID-19 are acting as “dual bioweapons” that are driving global surges in chronic disease and global sudden deaths.
They warn that humanity is being wiped out by the “toxic synergy” of the injections and the virus they are supposed to tackle.
The public was promised that Covid mRNA shots would protect against the virus.
However, mounting evidence now suggests the opposite.
In a chilling new manuscript, scientists assert the visus and “vaccines” have been working against humanity by fueling an unprecedented global health crisis.
The warning was revealed in a bombshell 380-reference scientific manuscript from the McCullough Foundation.
The paper, titled “Compound Adverse Effects of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination and Coronavirus Infection: A Convergence of Extensive Spike Protein Harms to the Human Body,” details what researchers are calling the “Hybrid Harms Hypothesis.”
McCullough Foundation epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, has been sounding the alarm over the findings.
In a post on Substack, Hulscher explains that “it’s important to understand that humanity was hit with dual biowarfare agents.”
He breaks down these two agents as:
- A manufactured SARS-CoV-2 virus — the product of U.S.–China collaboration, engineered through years of dangerous gain-of-function work.
- mRNA gene therapy “countermeasures” — conceived under DARPA’s pandemic programs over 10 years ago.
“Together, they have unleashed waves of chronic illness, sudden deaths, and unprecedented excess mortality,” Hulscher warns.
“We were told mRNA vaccines would protect us from the virus — yet mounting evidence shows they have done the complete opposite.”
Hulscher further raised the alarm during an interview with Brannon Howser of Worldview Tube.
WATCH: Click on the link to view the video below… Scientists Warn: mRNA Shots and COVID-19 Are ‘Dual Bioweapons’ Driving Global Excess Death
Authored by a multidisciplinary team including Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Stephanie Seneff, and Dr. Jessica Rose, the paper lays out how vaccination and infection work together to produce a dangerous, long-term “toxic synergy.”
This toxic synergy, the scientists found, is leading to chronic illness, sudden deaths, and record excess mortality worldwide.
The findings of the study were published in the Preprints journal.
The report describes five major features of the Hybrid Harms Hypothesis:
• Immune Toxicity: mRNA shots deliver spike protein, inflammatory lipid nanoparticles, and foreign DNA contaminants — all capable of damaging the immune system and potentially integrating into human DNA.
• Body-Wide Spread: The shot’s components do not remain at the injection site, instead circulating to the brain, heart, ovaries, adrenal glands, and even crossing the placental barrier.
• Prolonged Spike Production: Synthetic mRNA can drive spike protein production for months — in some cases, years — creating a prolonged “window of vulnerability” in which reinfections layer new damage on old.
• Cumulative Risk: Each additional dose stacks the total spike burden, altering immune function and weakening defenses against viruses and cancer.
• Overlapping Damage: Both the virus and the vaccine can cause inflammation, immune suppression, and autoimmunity. When combined, these effects are amplified — making post-vaccine infections more dangerous than either alone.
The paper points to data from eight nations showing major COVID-19 case and death surges began only after 75% of the population was “fully vaccinated” during the supposedly “mild” Omicron era.
Those countries were Denmark, Finland, Norway, Iceland, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore.
Protection from the shots fades within months, often flipping into negative efficacy, meaning more doses can actually increase the risk of infection.
A global analysis linked “vaccination” programs with up to 291% more cases and 205% more deaths than projections without them.
In addition, the researchers warn that many cases labeled “long Covid” since 2021 are actually “post-vaccine syndromes” caused by lingering spike protein from mRNA injections.
“Vaccinated” individuals have been found to carry far higher spike antibody levels and suffer more chronic symptoms than unvaccinated peers.
The finding suggests that “vaccine” injury is being misclassified, hiding the true toll of the shots.
Countries with high mRNA “vaccine” uptake have experienced persistent spikes in all-cause mortality, even after Omicron’s lethality dropped.
Many of these deaths were blamed on COVID-19 despite occurring in fully vaccinated or boosted individuals, often months or years after their last shot.
The Hybrid Harms Hypothesis offers a chilling explanation, revealing that prior “vaccination” may be worsening the severity of otherwise mild reinfections, driving fatal outcomes that would not have occurred without the shots.
If correct, millions of people may still be in a prolonged danger zone, at risk of serious illness or death with each new SARS-CoV-2 exposure.
The report concludes that mass mRNA “vaccination,” combined with repeated virus exposure, has created a sustained public health disaster unlike anything in modern history.
Hulscher notes that it is one for which there is still no accountability.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/scientists-sound-alarm-global-excess-deaths-driven-dual-bioweapons-covid-mrna-shots/
And,
-
Florida Bill Requires Full Investigation into Vaccine History for Sudden Deaths of Children, Babies
Blogger Comment: Why isn’t this happening across the world as it is happening in every western nation and in asian nations where they could afford the mRNA Covid 19 injections…
.
Lawmakers in Florida are moving to introduce new laws that will force medical examiners to investigate the vaccination history of any young adult, child, or infant who dies suddenly.
Florida is moving to shine a light on the connection between vaccines and sudden deaths in young, healthy people.
The links have long been a taboo subject that the medical establishment has tried to bury.
State Sen. Ileana Garcia introduced Senate Bill 188 this week, a proposal that would make Florida the first state to require medical examiners to document and report all recent vaccinations when investigating cases of sudden death in children and young people.
– Advertisement –
If passed, the bill would mandate that examiners review immunization records and report any vaccines or “emergency countermeasures” administered within 90 days of death to the CDC’s Sudden Unexpected Infant Death (SUID) and Sudden Death in the Young (SDY) Case Registry.
Medical examiners who fail to comply would face penalties.
Currently, Florida does not even provide medical examiners with a reporting option to flag recent vaccinations in autopsy findings.
“This is about finally looking at the data instead of ignoring it,” said Maija Hahn, a leading pathologist and autism specialist, who authored the bill.
“We’ve seen a massive increase in sudden deaths since the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine.
“If we don’t look, we’ll never know if the association is meaningful.”
Exposing What the CDC Won’t
The CDC already operates a registry to monitor sudden deaths in children, but participation is voluntary, patchy, and far from comprehensive.
Florida is not currently included.
A recent JAMA Network Open study revealed that the CDC underestimates sudden unexplained child deaths and that reporting standards are inconsistent nationwide.
The proposed Florida law would close that gap by forcing uniform reporting, including recent vaccination history, a data point long avoided by federal health authorities.
“Statistics are everything,” Hahn said.
“It’s time we actually collect them.”
Mounting Evidence of a Vaccine Link
The United States continues to record higher infant death rates than other wealthy nations, with Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) ranking as the third leading cause of infant mortality.
Though public health officials continue to blame sleep position and “unseen conditions,” research over decades has pointed to a plausible link between vaccines and SIDS.
SIDS did not appear in U.S. mortality statistics until after mass vaccination programs began in the 1960s.
By 1972, it was the leading cause of neonatal death.
Peer-reviewed studies have documented cases of infants dying within days of vaccination.
Just this year, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) paid $300,000 to parents Abigail and Daniel Sims, whose 11-week-old daughter Anna died after receiving four shots at a routine checkup.
Yet, instead of investigating vaccine risk, government officials pushed public relations campaigns like “Back to Sleep” and, later, “Safe to Sleep,” insisting parents simply needed to place babies on their backs to avoid SIDS.
Florida Leading the Way
Advocates say Florida’s legislation could set a national precedent, forcing uncomfortable questions about vaccines and sudden death into the open.
“This is about courage,” said author and vaccine injury advocate Wayne Rohde, who tracks cases in the VICP.
“Florida is leading the way.
“If we can get real data, other states will follow — and families may finally get answers.”
With the 2026 legislative session approaching, supporters are pushing for a parallel House bill to move alongside SB 188.
For parents who have lost children suddenly and without explanation, the measure represents something long denied to them: accountability and truth.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/florida-bill-requires-full-investigation-vaccine-history-sudden-deaths-children-babies/
And,
READ MORE – Major Study Confirms Every Covid ‘Vaccine’ Dose ‘Shortens the Lives of Recipients’
-
Neurodevelopmental Disorders Surge 550% Among ‘Vaccinated’ Children
Alarming new research has confirmed that chronic diseases, brain damage, and neurodevelopmental disorders are skyrocketing among “vaccinated” children.
The medical establishment has long insisted that today’s crowded vaccine schedule is “safe and effective.”
However, mounting research now tells a different story and points to a silent epidemic of chronic disease, brain damage, and mental health collapse among vaccinated children.
For decades, parents who questioned vaccines have been smeared as “conspiracy theorists” and accused of spreading so-called “disinformation.”.
Now, a series of large-scale studies is vindicating their warnings with hard data.
Troublingly, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and Big Pharma have fought to suppress this data.
The findings are grim.
The reveal that “vaccinated” children are not only far more likely to suffer from asthma, autoimmune disease, and neurodevelopmental disorders like autism and ADHD, but these conditions also fuel a secondary epidemic of depression, anxiety, and even suicide.
The Data Big Pharma Hoped You’d Never See
One of the most explosive revelations comes from The Inconvenient Study, a retrospective birth cohort analysis that tracked 18,468 children.
It compared 1,957 unvaccinated children with 16,511 vaccinated children over ten years.
The results demolish the “safe and effective” mantra:
• Vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to develop a chronic illness.
• They faced a 4.3-fold higher risk of asthma.
• They had a 6-fold higher risk of autoimmune disease.
• Most shocking: vaccinated children were 5.5 times more likely to suffer a neurodevelopmental disorder – a shocking 550% surge.
By age ten, only 43% of vaccinated children were free from chronic illness.
Among the unvaccinated, that figure was 83%.
In other words, most vaccinated kids are getting sicker, younger, and living with diseases their unvaccinated peers avoid.
The Mental Health Fallout
Another large-scale study of 267,000 children uncovered how these neurodevelopmental disorders cascade into mental health breakdowns.
The more conditions a child carried, the more their risk of depression and anxiety skyrocketed.
Children with two neurodevelopmental conditions were nearly 6 times more likely to suffer anxiety.
With five or more conditions, the risk exploded to 13 times higher than their neurotypical peers.
This means vaccination is not just linked to physical illness but also to a spiraling mental health crisis in children and teens.
The so-called “safe” shots are leaving kids burdened with multiple diagnoses that compound into emotional distress, hopelessness, and tragically, suicidal tendencies.
A Generation in Crisis
Health authorities have spent decades gaslighting parents, blaming sleep position for SIDS or inventing “triple-risk models” to explain away sudden deaths.
Meanwhile, evidence tying vaccines to everything from crib death to autism has been brushed aside, censored, or labeled “misinformation.”
But the convergence of rigorous data and lived experience is too stark to ignore: vaccines are reshaping the health landscape of an entire generation, fueling a chronic disease and mental health crisis unprecedented in U.S. history.
Millions of families are living this nightmare.
Their voices are being silenced while Big Pharma rakes in billions.
The mantra of “safe and effective” is collapsing.
These studies reveal that “vaccines” are not only seeding chronic physical conditions, they are also driving an escalating youth mental health epidemic.
It’s no longer enough to “treat the symptoms.”
Society must confront the root cause.
The evidence demands urgent transparency, accountability, and a total reevaluation of the vaccine schedule.
If we continue to ignore it, we are condemning our children to a lifetime of disease, depression, and despair.
It’s a betrayal that future generations will never forgive.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/neurodevelopmental-disorders-surge-550-among-vaccinated-children/
And,
READ MORE – Top Scientist: ‘Billions of People’ Have Been Permanently ‘Altered’ by Covid ‘Vaccines’
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
World Freedom 