World Freedom

Blogger Comment: The START of the total shut down and CONTROL of ‘Free-SPEECH’ in the United Kingdom and with the Digital ID Laws coming in if the British people allow this draconian Act of Law to be introduced, they can say goodbye to their freedoms forever, as this is the first main stage in controlling the people of the United Kingdom and what the Davos Globalist elites have ordered their western political puppet leaders [(except for only four western nations that are not captured by the Davos Globalists, the USA under Trump (and where Biden would have certainly capitulated and have done it, as he was a top WEF political controlled puppet whilst in Office and before even with Obama as well, and a clear pointer to this fact is what he did with the ‘open’ southern border whilst in power where over 20 million Illegals flooded the USA in a mere 4 years, where many were sadistic criminals, rapists, evil child paedophiles and murderers et al it has now officially been determined and confirmed), together with Slovakia, Hungary and Italy)] to do this so that they can bring in their One World Government (OWG) in the West by 2030 (for without this major 1st step and with the CBDC that comes after…the two evil brothers…the Globalist WEF could not take over the West) and where all dissent will be 100% suppressed by our military and police., as it will be Law and the judiciary will allow it to take place, as they too have been specially chisenb over the decades to do their masters bidding, as the law is not what it was before…totally independent and has been compromised…sounds familiar, well it is and a carbon copy in modern terms of what the NAZIS did to the German people to control them prior to WW2 that killed millions and set the world on fire…

The socialist UK government’s war on free expression has just reached a new low after celebrated British soccer star Joey Barton was found guilty on six criminal counts for posting “offensive” messages on social media.

The conviction of the renowned former UK soccer player and team manager is a chilling reminder of how far the country has fallen into speech policing.

On Friday, a Liverpool Crown Court jury declared the 43-year-old had “crossed the line between free speech and a crime” by expressing wrongtink online.

The court ruled that Barton had turned everyday online insults into prosecutable offenses in a country that once claimed to value liberty.

One of Barton’s supposed crimes was calling TV host Jeremy Vine a “bike nonce” in posts on 𝕏.

The soccer star made the remark after Vine suggested Barton had a “brain injury.”

No charges were filed against Vine, however.

Barton responded bluntly, asking:

“Have you been on Epstein Island?

“Are you going to be on these flight logs?

“Might as well own up now because I’d phone the police if I saw you near a primary school on ya bike.”

Another post the UK government deemed to be a speech crime read:

“Oh @theJeremyVine Did you Rolf-aroo and Schofield go out on a tandem bike ride?

“You big bike nonce ya.”

The comment appeared to be a reference to Rolf Harris, a former children’s TV host who was convicted of child sex crimes.

Barton was also prosecuted for a post warning:

“If you see this fella by a primary school call 999.

“Beware Man with Camera on his helmets cruising past primary schools.

“Call the Cops if spotted.”

Authorities went further, charging Barton with speech crimes for comparing sports commentators Lucy Ward and Eni Aluko to serial killers Fred and Rose West.

Barton wrote they were the “Fred and Rose West of football commentary.”

In court, Barton said he “would probably not do it again if he had his time again.”

He argued that Ward and Aluko are “strong enough” to handle the joke.

But that wasn’t enough for prosecutors intent on making an example of him.

They claimed Barton “targeted and bullied them” and “crossed the line between exercising a democratic right to freedom of expression and a crime” by “sending messages of an extreme, degrading and dehumanizing character.”

According to prosecutors:

“It was not some robust exchange of firmly held views or, as he would like you to believe, an attempt to generate an online debate.

“It was undiluted bullying.

“It was a campaign of such bullying by the deployment of grossly offensive messages — with the intention of sending them to cause distress, anxiety or humiliation.”

The judge even became visibly irritated when Barton wore a Union Jack scarf in court, a striking symbol of the nation now criminalizing speech while bristling at its own flag.

Judge Andrew Menary KC complained:

“He has chosen to adorn himself with a particular flag, which I suppose is a stunt to make a point.

“He will not be permitted to do that on the sentencing date.”

Barton is out on bail but will be sentenced on December 8.

It’s an incredible fall from grace for the failing nation, once the most powerful in the world, where posting edgy jokes online now carries the threat of prison.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/uk-soccer-star-found-guilty-speech-crimes-grossly-offensive-social-media-posts/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-newsletter

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Man Devastated After Government Euthanizes Both Grandmothers

Russia is taking another major step toward a fully state-controlled Internet, with lawmakers advancing a proposal that would make the country’s biometric and digital ID systems mandatory for all online age verification.

If approved, the plan would effectively eliminate online anonymity in Russia.

It will force citizens to verify their identity through government-run systems every time they access “adult” or “potentially harmful” content.

The proposal, discussed on October 28, is being promoted as a child protection initiative.

However, critics warn it’s the latest front in Moscow’s long campaign to bring the internet under total state supervision.

Officials claim the measure is meant to block minors from viewing pornography, violent media, and what they call “propaganda of antisocial behavior.”

But the definition of restricted content is so broad that it could easily encompass political speech, satire, or dissent.

Government-Controlled Verification Network

At the core of the plan is Gosuslugi, the Kremlin’s main digital services portal, already the hub for state identification and citizen tracking.

The system connects directly to Russia’s Unified System of Identification and Authentication (ESIA) and the Unified Biometrics System (UBS).

Both are controlled by the federal government.

State Duma deputy Anton Nemkin, a former FSB officer, said the networks “could be used to verify age without directly transmitting passport data to third-party platforms.”

In practice, that means the state becomes the mandatory middleman between every Russian citizen and the Internet by granting or denying access based on biometric verification.

Digital ‘Sovereignty’ or Total Surveillance?

Digital rights experts say the policy continues a decade-long erosion of online privacy in Russia.

Since 2012, Moscow has justified one new layer of censorship after another under the banner of “protecting children.”

Each expansion has given the state deeper insight into citizens’ private digital activity.

The new proposal aligns with Russia’s drive for “digital sovereignty,” a strategy to isolate and control the country’s Internet ecosystem while cutting off foreign platforms and anonymizing tools.

Andrei Svintsov, Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Information Policy, recently declared that online anonymity in Russia will disappear entirely within “three years, five at most.”

This new system would accelerate that goal by ensuring every citizen’s online behavior is directly tied to a verified digital identity stored in state databases.

A Centralized Record of Private Behavior

If implemented, Russians would be forced to log in through ESIA whenever they view content labeled as adult, even if that label is applied vaguely or politically.

The result would be a permanent, state-controlled record linking personal identities to private browsing and consumption habits, handing authorities unprecedented surveillance power.

Meanwhile, governments in other countries have tested various age-verification technologies.

However, Russia’s model stands apart for its total dependence on centralized biometric databases and direct government oversight.

Analysts say it’s not just about shielding minors; it’s about normalizing constant identity checks, building a digital framework where the Kremlin can monitor, restrict, or punish online behavior at will.

Follow the link for the source of the article… https://slaynews.com/news/russia-moves-mandate-biometric-digital-id-end-online-anonymity/

And,

READ MORE – Visa Launches Biometric Digital ID-Linked Payment System

Three additional Chinese researchers at the University of Michigan have been charged as part of a widening federal investigation into the smuggling of undeclared biohazardous material from China into the United States.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has just announced the arrest of the three scientists who were caught entering the country with undeclared biological material.

Federal prosecutors announced that Bai Xu, Zhang Fengfan, and Zhang Zhiyong were charged in a criminal complaint in the Eastern District of Michigan.

Bai and Zhang Fengfan face conspiracy charges for allegedly smuggling biological materials, while Zhang Zhiyong is accused of making false statements to federal agents.

The three researchers were arrested at New York City’s John F. Kennedy International Airport on October 16.

They were apprehended as they attempted to board a flight to flee to Communist China.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents detained them before departure.

Linked to Earlier Case

The charges are tied to the earlier arrest of Han Chengxuan, a scholar from China’s Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

Han arrived in the United States in June under a J-1 visa and was detained immediately after customs officials discovered she had previously shipped petri dishes containing C. elegans under false declarations.

C. elegans is a regulated biological organism.

Han later pleaded no contest to three smuggling counts and lying to U.S. officials.

She was sentenced to time served and removed from the country on September 11.

Shipments Flagged 

According to the criminal complaint, customs authorities intercepted multiple packages associated with Han and the three charged researchers.

Several shipments were falsely labeled as “plastic plates” or “doc” in an effort to hide their true contents.

However, investigators discovered:

• genetically modified C. elegans in petri dishes
• 28 plasmids—circular DNA molecules used in genetic engineering
• additional live biological samples

All of these qualify under U.S. regulations as biohazardous materials requiring proper declaration, permits, and handling protocols.

Federal officials say Bai refused to cooperate when questioned about an intercepted package last March.

Additional packages sent to “Dylan Zhang,” a false name believed to be Zhang Fengfan, contained more undeclared biological samples, including genetically modified organisms.

Zhang Zhiyong reportedly sent a mislabeled package containing nematodes to the University of Michigan as far back as 2019.

Non-Compliance and University Termination

After Han’s removal from the United States, the University of Michigan began an internal review.

Prosecutors say all three researchers “refused to participate” and were subsequently terminated.

Their J-1 visa records were canceled on October 8, making them ineligible to remain in the country.

Customs interviews conducted at JFK Airport on October 16 revealed that all three identified Han as a member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Prosecutors also noted Han’s academic connections to senior figures at Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

Broader Concerns About Biosecurity

The case comes amid heightened scrutiny of foreign nationals working in U.S. laboratories.

In recent months, multiple smuggling-related prosecutions have originated from the University of Michigan, including a case involving a researcher accused of attempting to import Fusarium graminearum, a fungus capable of destroying major grain crops.

Republican Rep. John Moolenaar (R-MI), who chairs the House Select Committee on the CCP, said the latest charges reflect “an organized network of scholars engaged in illegal activity” tied to broader efforts by the Chinese government to obtain American research and technology.

“These new charges reveal an organized network of scholars engaged in illegal activity on Michigan’s campus,” Moolenaar warned..

“It is part of a broader, coordinated campaign targeting universities across the country, driven by China’s efforts to acquire American technology.”

In a statement this week, Attorney General Pam Bondi said:

“Attempting to smuggle biological materials under the guise of ‘research’ is a serious crime that threatens America’s national and agricultural security.

“We will remain vigilant to threats like these from foreign nationals who would take advantage of America’s generosity to advance a malicious agenda.”

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/chinese-scientists-caught-smuggling-biohazardous-material-america/

And,

READ MORE – Russia Moves to Mandate Biometric Digital ID to End Online Anonymity

Blogger Comment: This is another warning to the people in the UK that control is coming like never before and before the UK government expidites their Globalist masters wishes before 2030, as the UK (and every EU nation except three, Slovakia, Hungary and Italy) is clearly now a captured state of the elite Davos WEF doing all of their bidding and Starmer is just one of the Gloabalist’s puppet political leaders (and where now most of the EU’s po;itical leaders are enthrowned by the Davos elites over the last 30 years and all preplanned of course…

The UK government’s communications regulator Ofcom is facing backlash and a federal lawsuit after asserting that the U.S. Constitution does not protect American citizens from its online censorship laws.

Under the United Kingdom’s sweeping Online Safety Act, Ofcom has been sending enforcement letters to small U.S. platforms, including 4chan and Kiwi Farms.

Ofcom is demanding compliance with British speech regulations and threatening heavy fines for noncompliance.

But the move has triggered what one U.S. attorney calls a “constitutional ambush.”

Preston Byrne, an attorney representing 4chan, Kiwi Farms, and two other American companies, said the regulator’s actions were “frankly asinine.”

“My clients are entirely American,” Byrne said.

“All of their operations are American.

“All of their infrastructure is American, and they have no connection to the UK whatsoever.”

Despite that, Ofcom reportedly threatened the companies with “a £20,000 fine plus £100 daily penalties for 60 days thereafter.”

Byrne responded by filing a federal lawsuit in Washington, D.C., challenging Ofcom’s jurisdiction and accusing it of attempting to export censorship into the United States.

“We Don’t Care What the UK Thinks”

Byrne said the lawsuit was designed to make three points:

• To demonstrate that U.S. companies are prepared to fight back against foreign censorship regimes.
• To assert his clients’ rights in front of a U.S. federal judge.
• To provoke Ofcom into “doing something stupid,” which he said it promptly did.

After the filing, Byrne said Ofcom sent “a 40-page letter of tremendous length, which is deeply unserious.”

According to Byrne, Ofcom’s response included an explicit admission that it does not “think U.S. law applies on U.S. soil” and intends to rely on sovereign immunity.

It’s a position Byrne called self-defeating.

“This rather undermines the British government’s assertions that it’s made time and again, including to the President, to his face, that the British government is not using its sovereign power to censor American citizens,” Byrne said.

In an official notice sent to 4chan, Ofcom made its position clear:

“We also note 4chan’s claim that it is protected from enforcement action taken by Ofcom because of the First Amendment to the US Constitution.

“However, the First Amendment binds only the US government and not overseas bodies, such as Ofcom, and therefore, it does not affect Ofcom’s powers to enforce the Act in this case.”

A Legal Contradiction in Writing

That statement, intended to justify Ofcom’s enforcement, may have undercut its entire legal case.

By asserting that the First Amendment “binds only the U.S. government,” Ofcom admits it stands entirely outside the U.S. constitutional order, yet it simultaneously claims the right to enforce British speech law against U.S.-based companies operating solely on American soil.

If Ofcom claims the U.S. Constitution doesn’t apply to its actions, legal experts say, then neither does the UK’s Online Safety Act, which has no authority beyond Britain’s borders.

Ofcom’s position effectively amounts to asserting foreign jurisdiction inside the United States, something American courts are unlikely to recognize.

“Ultimately, from a global free speech resistance standpoint, and this is something that I think Ofcom really doesn’t understand,” Byrne said.

“We don’t care what the UK thinks in the United States…

“And our objective is really to demonstrate the toothlessness of these global regimes in the United States, where most of the Internet is based.”

U.S. Lawmakers Join the Fight

Byrne said his team has reached out to the White House, both houses of Congress, and several lawmakers are now exploring legislation to block foreign censorship enforcement on U.S. soil.

“I’m advised that there are a number of senators in Congress and representatives in Congress who are looking at introducing a bill to put a stop to this,” he said.

Byrne added that he is also backing a New Hampshire state law that would create a $1 million penalty per occurrence against any foreign regulator that tries to enforce censorship inside the United States, along with a waiver of sovereign immunity in state courts.

Ofcom Defends Skipping Legal Channels

Ofcom, for its part, insists it does not need to use the U.S.–UK Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT).

MLAT is the formal process governments use to request evidence or cooperation across borders.

“There is no requirement in the Act for Ofcom to use the MLAT procedure to serve notices issued under the Act,” the regulator said in its notice.

“The MLAT procedure is not an appropriate method of service for administrative investigations, but reserved for obtaining assistance in the investigation or prosecution of criminal offenses.”

That reasoning has been widely criticized as an attempt to circumvent international law by treating enforcement demands as “administrative” rather than legal.

The plaintiffs argue that Ofcom’s approach amounts to “coercive extraterritorial power,” warning that if the regulator wants information from U.S. companies, it must go through the Department of Justice and the courts, not by “emailing a webmaster and demanding records under threat of criminal penalty.”

The Broader Pattern of Global Censorship

Ofcom’s move follows a growing trend of foreign governments bypassing U.S. legal channels to demand content takedowns and user data from American tech firms.

Brazil’s Supreme Court, led by Justice Alexandre de Moraes, has done the same.

The radical judge’s efforts have prompted the U.S. government to impose sanctions on Brazilian officials over censorship and human rights concerns.

X has publicly warned that such actions “set a dangerous precedent for extraterritorial censorship disguised as regulatory enforcement.”

Ofcom’s Overreach Exposed

Ofcom justifies its letters by claiming that any site with “links to the UK,” such as having British users, falls under its jurisdiction.

In one notice, Ofcom cited 4chan’s seven percent UK user base as evidence that it “targets” Britain.

Legal experts call that argument absurd.

Under such logic, any global website with British visitors could be forced to obey UK speech laws, including American news sites and forums.

In the end, Ofcom’s attempt to act as the world’s speech police may have backfired.

Its strategy, ignoring the U.S. Constitution, dismissing MLAT procedures, and issuing fines it cannot collect, has now become a test case in how far a foreign government can go before hitting the hard limits of American sovereignty.

As Byrne put it: “Our objective is really to demonstrate the toothlessness of these global regimes in the United States.”

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/uk-government-first-amendment-doesnt-protect-americans-british-censorship-laws/

And,

READ MORE – Marco Rubio Announces Visa Restriction for Foreigners ‘Complicit in Censoring Americans’

Blogger Comment: This is all part of the Globalist Davos plan to try and con us into believing this is right, but where the WEF’s real plan in reality is to divide us and to make racial tensions move the world away from compassion and the wellbeing of mutually peaceful societies to ones that are against peace and understanding…one of the Globalist’s mindsets of control…

A new advertisement from Denmark’s state broadcaster is drawing attention for its messaging about genetics and diversity, reigniting discussion about political themes in Western advertising.

The commercial, which promotes a science program titled “Evolution,” features an on-screen “expert” interrupting a white Danish couple as they flirt.

The expert explains that Denmark’s history of war introduced foreign DNA into the national gene pool, which he says “protected them from disease.”

He then compares their relationship to inbreeding because they are both white and suggests they seek partners with more “exotic” genetics.

The woman then smiles as if intrigued by the idea.

The series first aired in 2020 but is now being re-released with the same “inbreeding” advertisements in 2025.

The tone of the new campaign stands in sharp contrast to the nation’s 2014 “Do It For Denmark” ads.

The ad campaign encouraged Danish couples to have more children to address the country’s declining birth rate.

WATCH: Click on the link to view the video below… Danish TV Commercial Shames Citizens for Starting Families with Other White People

Broader Trends in Advertising Representation

Observers have noted that the ad follows a broader trend of political or social themes in Western marketing, with campaigns often promoting messages around “diversity” and “inclusion.”

Data from the UK’s Channel 4 “Mirror” study found that while the UK population is approximately 83% white, black citizens, who make up about 4% of the population, appear in more than half of national television commercials.

Commentators have argued that this reflects a push for greater representation, though critics say it may not reflect demographic realities.

Advertising in both Europe and the United States has increasingly featured interracial couples, who make up roughly 10% of all marriages, according to U.S. and European data.

Social Media and Political Reactions

Public responses to these trends have varied.

Some argue that increased diversity in advertising reflects social progress, while others see it as an overcorrection or a politically motivated effort.

In the United States, controversy erupted earlier this year when American Eagle aired a jeans commercial featuring actress Sydney Sweeney, in which she discussed her “good genes.”

Some online commentators accused the brand and Sweeney of promoting “Nazi propaganda,” calling the language offensive.

The incident drew widespread attention to how advertising narratives, once focused primarily on consumer products, have become touchpoints in broader cultural and political debates.

Advertising as Social Messaging

Industry analysts note that advertising has long mirrored cultural priorities and public discourse.

While it remains a vehicle for selling goods and services, it increasingly serves as a platform for social commentary, reflecting evolving norms, values, and political perspectives.

The Danish advertisement and its reception illustrate how marketing campaigns can provoke debate over national identity, representation, and the

role of ideology in commercial media.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/danish-tv-commercial-shames-citizens-starting-families-white-people/

And,

READ MORE – Arizona Judge Caught Urinating Outside Courthouse: ‘This Is Disgusting’

The Canadian government’s plan to soon begin euthanizing citizens suffering from mental illness is facing a growing uprising from the public, conservative lawmakers, and concerned doctors.

The major backlash is swelling amid growing outrage over how vulnerable citizens, including veterans, are being railroaded into cheap “assisted suicide” instead of more expensive care.

A Conservative MP’s bill to stop Canada’s next planned expansion of assisted suicide is now rapidly gaining momentum, with support from the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition (EPC).

During a press conference in Ottawa, the EPC warned that Canada’s euthanasia program, officially called “Medical Assistance in Dying” (MAiD), has already gone far beyond its original intent.

Campaigners are arguing that it must not be expanded to people suffering from mental illness.

“Our takeaway message is this,” said Gordon Friesen, EPC president.

“No euthanasia for mental illness.”

Friesen said MAiD was initially intended for terminally ill people who “were dying” after exhausting all treatment options and could “freely choose.”

But he argued those safeguards have been eroded.

“Unfortunately, all of those promises have been broken,” Friesen said.

“What fuels support for MAiD is not that people believe that some patients should die, but because they can make free, informed, competent, and adult choices,” he added.

“Euthanasia for the mentally ill does not fit that description.

“For the symptoms of mental illness often make that sort of choice impossible.”

Veteran Exposes “Coercion” in Canada’s Euthanasia System

Among the speakers was Canadian Forces combat veteran Kelsi Sheren.

Sheren said she was pressured into “choosing” euthanasia as an “option” instead of treatment.

“I understood that I might die for my country, but what I didn’t understand was that … one day, my own government would quietly offer to help me do it,” Sheren said.

“When somebody is drowning in trauma and desperation, that’s not a choice, that’s coercion, wearing a polite face,” she continued.

“I’ve spoken with veterans who have reached out for help and asked for therapy, for hope, for treatment, and what they got instead was an offer to end their lives.”

Sheren’s testimony echoes a series of recent reports in which disabled Canadians and veterans say they were encouraged to consider MAiD instead of receiving mental health care or housing assistance.

Conservative Bill Seeks to End Expansion Plans

The legislation at the center of the debate, Bill C-218, was introduced by Conservative MP Tamara Jansen.

It has passed its first reading in Parliament and is now at the second reading stage.

The bill, formally titled An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying), would explicitly prevent the government from expanding euthanasia eligibility to those suffering solely from mental illness.

“Allowing ‘medical assistance in dying’ for those with mental illness is not healthcare, that’s not compassion, it’s abandonment,” Jansen said.

“Mental illness is treatable.

“Recovery is possible, but only if we show up and help.”

The bill states plainly:

“This enactment amends the Criminal Code to provide that a mental disorder is not a grievous and irremediable medical condition for which a person could receive medical assistance in dying.”

Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre praised Jansen’s leadership on the issue, saying she is working “to protect these people and get them proper health care and treatment, not assisted suicide.”

Canada’s Expanding Euthanasia Regime

Since 2016, when euthanasia was first legalized under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, roughly 90,000 Canadians have died under the MAiD program, according to a new report from the EPC.

Originally restricted to the terminally ill, the program was expanded in 2021 through Bill C-7 to include people with chronic conditions.

The ruling Liberal Party government has since sought to extend it again, this time to people whose sole underlying condition is mental illness.

Following backlash from pro-life advocates, medical professionals, and provincial governments, the government delayed the mental illness expansion until 2027.

The government was forced to postpone the plan following a pushback from doctors who refused to euthanize patients for mental illness.

But the EPC warns that delay is not enough.

Proponents of Bill C-218 argue that making euthanasia available to those with mental illness would cross an ethical red line.

It has been transforming Canada’s health system from one meant to save lives into one that facilitates death for people in crisis.

Conveniently, Canada’s socialized healthcare system is saving tens of millions of dollars a year by euthanizing patients instead of treating them.

“No Euthanasia for Mental Illness”

Friesen said the message from Canadians is simple: Stop before it goes any further.

“No euthanasia for mental illness,” he reiterated.

“We must protect the vulnerable, not enable despair.”

Sheren’s story and the EPC’s campaign have amplified growing public concern that Canada’s euthanasia regime has spiraled out of control.

It comes as bureaucrats and health officials are now increasingly treating death as a solution to suffering.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/canadians-rise-up-against-governments-plan-euthanize-mentally-ill-citizens/

And,

READ MORE – Canada Moves to Begin Euthanizing Children Without Parental Consent

Blogger Comment: This is what is now happening all over the western world and has become an epidemic in its nature as though their is a central instrument directing all this new way of dying early and its not even with the teerminal ill anymore, but predominantly people in good health and mind…what is happening to us as the only intelligent species known to exist in science that can think for itself and take alternative pathways in life and make informed decisions…as this goes totally against the modus operadi of human life…for unfortunately the old and frail are easy led by people they have learnt to believe in and trust…like the medical profession and politicians that is driving this phenomena it appears based upon raw evidence…

A Canadian man is sounding the alarm after both of his grandmothers were killed by government-sanctioned euthanasia within weeks in a double tragedy, he says has left deep wounds that will never fully heal.

“We’re here because two of my four grandparents died through euthanasia within two months of each other,” said Benjamin Turland, opening a powerful new video.

Turland told his story in the new short film released through Dying to Meet You, a storytelling project run by Amanda Achtman.

Achtman’s work has spotlighted Canadians who have been pressured into “choosing” euthanasia instead of receiving more expensive care.

Those featured include Roger Foley, who was repeatedly offered MAiD while seeking help, and Christine, an elderly woman who tattooed “Don’t Euthanize Me” on her arm out of fear of the system.

Turland’s testimony adds another devastating layer.

He described the moment his parents told him that his first grandmother had been euthanized under the government’s MAiD program:

“I’ve never had that experience before where I felt like someone punched me in the gut,” he said.

“She was most likely going to die within a few days by natural causes… it just wrecked me.”

Two months later, the grandmother he was closest to was also euthanized by the government.

She wasn’t just a family member; she was his confidant, his friend, even his roommate while he attended university.

They called each other “Bestie.”

Losing her by lethal injection left him questioning everything.

“There’s a strong guilt of like, why didn’t I say something?” he told Achtman.

“The message [her choice of euthanasia] sends to me is, I’m like, did I not love you enough?

“Did I not love you the correct way?

“Did I not make you feel like you are not a burden?”

The questions haunt him.

“If I could have had two more days with you, would I take that?” he said.

“Yes. Over anything.

“Because now I don’t have you…

“Even if you can’t talk… even if I just get to hold your hand.”

For Turland, it wasn’t just the deaths; it was the method.

“It’s the choice of MAiD that hurts,” he said.

“With my grandfathers, I couldn’t have done anything about them passing…

“But when you choose it, I feel like there is something I could have done, and it impacts multiple generations.”

He pleaded with Canadians to talk openly with their elderly loved ones now, before they reach a vulnerable moment and feel pressured toward ending their lives.

According to Turland, these conversations may be difficult, but nothing compares to the pain of losing a grandparent through MAiD.

While supporters of euthanasia frame the procedure as compassionate relief, Turland says the reality is far more complicated: families are left confused, grieving, and wondering if they could have done more.

Activists, he noted, often tell them they aren’t “entitled” to their grief.

He rejects that entirely.

Life, he says, should be anchored in love and presence.

“You’re saying to them: I just want to be with you, for every moment, till every last breath,” he told Achtman.

“I don’t know why that would be a bad thing for them to hear, because they are going to feel so loved.”

WATCH: If the video below does not operate, click on the link here to view on tedirect weblink… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNtjlJ7Wx6U

As Canada prepares to expand euthanasia to include those with mental illness in 2027, stories like Turland’s are becoming increasingly urgent.

They serve as reminders that behind every MAiD statistic is a family left asking why.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-man-devastated-government-euthanizes-both-grandmothers/

And,

READ MORE – Canadian Doctors Boast of Feeling ‘Energized’ After Euthanizing Patients

Blogger COMmEnT: This I believe is another build-up story for the Globalist, who have been warning in their madness in taking control of humanity by 2030 through their OWG agenda that an alien invasion of Earth is coming and to constantly put these thoughts in the subconscious mind of the people through fear and a feeling of surrender to save themselves and humanity where the people believe this fake Globalists agenda…as fear is the prime weapon of the Davos elite who now control NASA and all points South to the hidden constructs within Antarctica, where mystery after mystery surrounds more mysteries, as any CIA controlled entity will tell you…

Astronomers are sounding the alarm after reporting unusual behavior from the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS as it nears the Sun.

The leading scientists tracking the 3I/ATLAS have reported two significant new developments after moving behind the Sun, out of view from Earth.

Behind the Sun, the comet appears to show signs of acceleration beyond what is expected by gravity.

And for reasons not yet clear, it appears to have changed color for a second time as the object approached perihelion.

The second unexplained color change and signs of non-gravitational acceleration are sending shockwaves through the astronomy and astrophysics communities.

The findings have just been revealed in a study published on the pre-print server arXiv.

3I/ATLAS, first identified on July 1 by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS), is only the third confirmed interstellar visitor to pass through our Solar System, following 1I/ʻOumuamua and 2I/Borisov.

Its unusual trajectory, with an eccentricity above 6, confirmed its extrasolar origin.

Since its discovery, astronomers have debated the object’s composition and behavior, noting characteristics that suggest it may be an exceptionally old remnant from a much earlier era of the universe.

Researchers have also struggled to determine which region of the Milky Way it originated from.

As the object approached perihelion on October 29, it moved into a position directly behind the Sun from Earth’s perspective.

The maneuver has limited observational opportunities during a key phase of its journey.

In the new study, scientists used imagery from Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory (STEREO), SOlar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO), and the GOES-19 weather satellite to monitor the object despite the line-of-sight challenges.

Their findings indicate that 3I/ATLAS brightened far more rapidly than typical Oort-cloud comets and underwent a marked shift in color.

The team reports the object brightened to approximately magnitude 9, making it visible through small telescopes.

They note that “color photometry shows the comet to be distinctly bluer than the Sun.”

This is the second known color change, and researchers say they currently lack a definitive explanation for the behavior.

The brightening rate is described as “far in excess” of what is normally observed in comets originating from the outer reaches of the Solar System.

Evidence of Non-Gravitational Acceleration

In separate observations, Davide Farnocchia of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory reported signs of non-gravitational acceleration, meaning the object’s motion cannot be explained by gravity alone.

Harvard University theoretical physicist Avi Loeb summarized the findings, writing that the acceleration was detected at a distance of 1.36 AU from the Sun, roughly 203 million kilometers.

He notes a “radial acceleration away from the Sun of 135 kilometers (=9×10^{-7}au) per day squared” and a “transverse acceleration relative to the Sun’s direction of 60 kilometers (=4×10^{-7}au) per day squared.”

Scientists caution that non-gravitational acceleration does not prove the object is maneuvering; many comets experience additional acceleration due to outgassing, the release of gas and dust as surface ices are heated by the Sun.

Loeb writes that, assuming typical thermal ejection speeds, “the evaporation half-life of 3I/ATLAS is 6 months,” adding that the object could lose around ten percent of its mass over the month surrounding perihelion.

If so, researchers expect a detectable plume of gas during November and December 2025.

The European Space Agency’s JUICE spacecraft may be able to help confirm whether this mass loss is occurring.

Brightening Continues, but Causes Remain Unclear

In their pre-print analysis, the observing team reports that “the comet will likely emerge from conjunction considerably brighter than when it entered,” projecting a geocentric V magnitude of ~9 at perihelion.

They note this may be “driven by prominent, visible gas emission.”

However, they emphasize that major questions remain:

“The reason for 3I’s rapid brightening… remains unclear.”

They note that earlier cooling effects from CO₂ sublimation could have suppressed water-ice sublimation at greater distances, contributing to the unusual brightness surge as the object approached the Sun.

They also note that 3I/ATLAS is moving toward the Sun more rapidly than most comets, which may be influencing its activity.

What Comes Next

Researchers stress that 3I/ATLAS’s post-perihelion behavior is unpredictable.

“Without an established physical explanation, the outlook for 3I’s postperihelion behavior remains uncertain,” they conclude.

They add that the object could plateau, continue brightening briefly, or begin to fade as it moves away from the Sun.

Continued observations in the coming weeks may help resolve the questions surrounding this rare interstellar visitor.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/interstellar-object-3i-atlas-changes-color-begins-accelerating/

And,

READ MORE – Harvard Scientist: NASA Is Hiding Key Evidence on Mysterious Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS

Blogger Comment: The corruption in the former Biden government and their control over the FBI and the Justice Department is an unprecedented chapter in US history and where political syndicate crimes against Americans were non-stop, which showed clearly the blatent and operational modus operanti of crimes against the people of the United States that was in constant action totally against law and order showing clearly how utterly corrupt the ‘DEMOCRAT’ Biden Administration really was with no comparable US Administration ever, as they thrived on crime to contually distort the minds of the American people through lies after lies after lies…period

Jeffrey Epstein allegedly told his former cellmate that federal prosecutors in New York offered to let him walk free if he falsely implicated President Donald Trump in his crimes.

The allegations were revealed in a newly surfaced pardon application.

Epstein, arrested in July 2019 on sex-trafficking and conspiracy charges, briefly shared a cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center with former police officer Nicholas Tartaglione.

At the time, Tartaglione was awaiting trial on a quadruple-murder case.

Tartaglione, 57, now claims Epstein confided that prosecutors pressed him to tie Trump to his crimes.

The allegation is detailed in a July pardon application obtained by The New York Post.

“Prosecutors … told Epstein that if he said President Trump was involved with Esptein’s crimes, he would walk free. in a petition to be pardoned,” Tartaglione wrote.

He also alleges Epstein said that then–lead prosecutor Maurene Comey, the daughter of disgraced former FBI Director James Comey, told him “he didn’t have to prove anything, as long as President Trump’s people could not disprove it.”

The filing further claims Comey said the FBI was “her people, not his [President Trump’s].”

Tartaglione says Epstein insisted:

“President Trump was not involved in Epstein’s crimes.”

The documents do not specify what allegations prosecutors wanted Epstein to make.

Epstein, who had ties across political and corporate circles, faced charges that carried a potential decades-long sentence at the time of his death.

Maurene Comey, who led the prosecution in Tartaglione’s murder case, was fired by the Department of Justice in July.

She has not yet commented on the allegations.

Epstein’s Final Weeks in MCC

Tartaglione and Epstein shared a cell until July 23, 2019, the night the late pedophile was found with bruising on his neck in what officials called a suicide attempt.

Epstein was then moved to suicide watch and later assigned a different cellmate.

On August 10, Epstein was found dead in his cell.

His death was officially ruled a suicide, though persistent security lapses, missing video footage, and conflicting accounts from staff have fueled ongoing public scrutiny.

Tartaglione: Prosecution Manipulated Evidence

Tartaglione, a former Westchester K9 officer, was later convicted of murdering four men after suspecting an employee had stolen drug money. He is now serving a life sentence.

In his pardon request, Tartaglione claims he was framed. He alleges:

• A seized mobile phone was tampered with to add his name as a contact
• Video evidence was “altered, spliced, mutilated, and destroyed”
• A cooperating witness, Joseph Biggs, fabricated details after meeting prosecutors 30 times

Biggs later received a 17-year sentence rather than life after admitting to pulling the trigger in one of the killings and cooperating with the government.

At sentencing, the judge criticized Tartaglione’s conduct, saying he cared more about animals than the people he killed, calling him delusional and citing “overwhelming evidence.”

Safety Concerns After Epstein’s Death

Tartaglione says he has survived multiple attempts on his life inside federal custody since Epstein’s death.

He says the attacks include assaults that left him with a metal plate in his head.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/james-comeys-daughter-offered-release-epstein-return-false-claims-trump/

And,

READ MORE – Experts Reveal Ex-Prince Andrew Now ‘Vulnerable’ to Criminal Charges Over Epstein Ties After Losing Royal Protections

Blooger Comment: The Globalists are going to close down what we are told by our Press and News Platforms and we shall hear what they want us to know, never the truth but pure propaganda and where this article is an example of the what WEF controlled people are doing to ‘truth news’ through the WEF Globalist’s cover-up and Close Down Agenda in the western world and we have to thank God that there is a Trump in at least one non-captured nation now, the USA and where there are only 4 western nations that are now WEF free… Every free citizen of the world should read this article to open up their eyes and minds to what is really going on…as its all about controlling ..YOU and Your Loved Ones…

Stanford University is under congressional investigation over allegations that its Cyber Policy Center has been working with foreign governments and NGOs to censor Americans’ speech.

The censorship effort was revealed in a report from investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) is leading the probe, seeking answers on whether the university coordinated with overseas officials to pressure U.S. platforms into removing content protected under the First Amendment.

In an October 22 letter, Jordan demanded documents from Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center relating to what he described as a “foreign censorship scheme” and a roundtable held last month that “brought together foreign officials who have directly targeted American speech.”

Secret Meeting with Foreign Censorship Officials

According to Jordan, the event’s keynote speaker was Julie Inman-Grant, “the Australian eSafety Commissioner who has explicitly argued that governments have the authority to demand and enforce global takedowns of content.”

The roundtable, which Stanford did not publicly announce, was “secret and only discovered thanks to a whistleblower who provided Jordan’s investigators with the agenda,” Shellenberger reported.

Attendees reportedly included representatives from the European Union, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Brazil.

“By hosting this event, designed to encourage and facilitate censorship compliance with regulators from Australia, Brazil, the EU, and the UK, Stanford is working with foreign censorship officials to vitiate the First Amendment,” Jordan wrote in his letter.

History of Collusion Claims

Shellenberger noted that in 2023, Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center was “caught covering up and lying” about its collaboration with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) during the Biden administration to censor online speech.

Documents released in the Twitter Files revealed that the Stanford Internet Observatory, part of the same center, worked with DHS and Big Tech companies to suppress online posts questioning the government’s pandemic narrative.

Jordan’s letter said the new inquiry is part of a broader effort to determine “how and to what extent foreign laws, regulations, and judicial orders compel, coerce, or influence companies to censor speech in the United States.”

He gave Stanford director Jeff Hancock, Ph.D., until November 5 to comply.

“Weaponizing Foreign Laws” to Bypass U.S. Free Speech

California attorney Greg Glaser warned that the situation represents “a dangerous fusion of academia, government, and corporate power to circumvent constitutional protections.”

Stanford’s prior involvement in content moderation during the COVID-19 era, Glaser said, amounted to a bypass of the First Amendment, using private platforms to do what the government could not legally do itself.

Jordan agreed that a “new threat” is emerging: foreign laws requiring U.S. companies to remove content accessible to Americans.

“The Committee is concerned that Stanford, and specifically its Cyber Policy Center, may be one of the third parties engaged in assisting foreign governments attempting to suppress American speech,” Jordan wrote.

Global Push for Censorship

The European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) and the UK’s Online Safety Act have been cited as examples of international laws with far-reaching censorship implications.

In June, a House Judiciary Committee staff report found that the EU “weaponizes the DSA as a censorship tool that requires the world’s largest social media platforms to engage in censorship of core political discourse.”

Data from X’s 2024 DSA Transparency Report showed that Germany accounted for nearly 90% of all EU requests to identify or censor users accused of posting “illegal or harmful speech.”

The UK, which enacted its own Online Safety Act in October 2023, reportedly made over 12,000 arrests for online speech that year.

The number is higher than arrests in Germany, China, Turkey, and Belarus combined, according to The Times of London.

Australia’s Online Safety Act, enforced by Inman-Grant’s eSafety Commission, carries similar provisions.

Inman-Grant told the World Economic Forum she aims to “coordinate, build capacity… use the tools that we have.”

She added that globalists must “work together with other like-minded independent statutory authorities around the globe.”

Inman-Grant is listed as one of the WEF’s “Agenda Contributors.”

Glaser said such coordination represents “an end-run around Americans’ fundamental rights”, using foreign partnerships to suppress protected speech.

“Stanford’s Internet Observatory Didn’t Die — It Went Global”

Jordan’s letter accused Stanford of once again “attempting to covertly undermine the First Amendment rights of Americans by collaborating with foreign government officials.”

Shellenberger reported that while the Stanford Internet Observatory was widely believed to be dismantled amid prior scrutiny, it was revived under new funding.

The roundtable in question was financed by Frank McCourt, a major donor to the Cyber Policy Center, through his Project Liberty Institute, which promotes “digital governance” and “democratic values.”

“Stanford’s Internet Observatory didn’t die, it went global,” said Seamus Bruner, author of Controligarchs and research director at the Government Accountability Institute.

“The same censorship cartel that policed Americans’ speech during Covid is now hiding behind foreign flags.

“They’re trying to do overseas what the Constitution forbids them to do at home. Congress should treat this as a national sovereignty issue, not just a speech issue,” Bruner said.

Targeting “True Stories”

The Virality Project, housed within the Stanford Internet Observatory, was a key player in monitoring social media content during the pandemic.

According to the Twitter Files, the project tracked and flagged “true stories” as “disinformation.”

Those flagged included posts by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Kennedy was described as producing “a large volume of content that is almost always reportable.”

The documents showed the project worked “in partnership with the CDC” and promoted pro-vaccine narratives, influencing Twitter’s content moderation policies.

In 2022, the Virality Project proposed a “rumor-control mechanism” to manage trending narratives, an idea later mirrored by the FDA’s “Rumor Control” initiative launched the same year.

Taxpayer-Funded “Censorship-Industrial Complex”

Shellenberger told Congress last year that “taxpayers are unwittingly financing the growth and power of a censorship-industrial complex run by America’s scientific and technological elite, which endangers our liberties and democracy.”

The revelations have played a key role in the ongoing Missouri v. Biden lawsuit, which accuses federal agencies of working with private companies to silence protected speech online.

The case remains active in federal court after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to uphold prior injunctions against the defendants earlier this year.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/stanford-caught-colluding-foreign-governments-censor-americans/

And,

READ MORE – Harvard Scientist: NASA Is Hiding Key Evidence on Mysterious Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS