World Freedom

Blogger Comment: When peopl are offered Euthanasia over help and treatment, you know that something has gone horribly wrong…period

Canada’s spiraling euthanasia system is once again under fire as heartbreaking new accounts reveal that a surging number of patients are being forced into “choosing” the government’s “assisted suicide” death program after being denied actual medical care under the nation’s collapsing socialized healthcare model.

An alarming number of Canadians are reporting that they have no other choice but to agree to be euthanized by the government, despite the supposed availability of treatments for their conditions.

As Slay News has previously reported, the government’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program is now saving tens of millions of dollars a year.

In 2024, the government saved over $136 million by euthanizing patients instead of treating them.

The latest chilling case to emerge is that of 84-year-old Cleo Gratton, a retired diamond driller from Chelmsford, Ontario.

Gratton’s story is sending shockwaves across the country.

He died earlier this month of natural causes, but only after being approved for the government’s “assisted suicide” scheme.

His family says the approval came directly after an appalling hospital experience that left him convinced death was preferable to returning to the facility.

Gratton suffered from heart disease and kidney failure.

But instead of receiving dignified care during a recent hospital stay, the CBC reports he spent a night in an emergency room, only to be transferred to a hallway on the seventh floor.

The taxpayer-funded doctors refused to give him the care he needed and convinced him that euthanasia would better serve the greater good.

“There were no lights; all the bulbs in that hallway had been completely removed,” his daughter Lynn said.

“Patients are passing by, nurses are going by, no privacy, no compassion, no dignity.”

She added that nurses had to use headlamps just to examine his feet.

The conditions were so degrading that Gratton told his family he would “rather die than go back.” Days later, he applied for MAiD — Canada’s euthanasia program now infamous for replacing care with chemical death.

Before his natural passing, Gratton pleaded with his family to expose what he endured: “Push, push, push for change… Make people aware of what’s going on.”

His family is honoring that wish.

A Pattern of Patients Being Denied Care — but Approved for Death

Gratton’s story is only the latest in a staggering pattern: Canadians who want medical treatment, home care, or palliative support are being told the only available option is assisted suicide.

Slay News has been tracking these cases for years, and they’re accelerating:

   • Norman Meunier (Quebec): A quadriplegic man who developed severe bedsores after being left on an ER stretcher for four days without a proper mattress. Overwhelmed and denied home care, he “chose” MAiD last year.

   • “Mrs. B” (Ontario): An 80-year-old woman denied hospice and palliative care. After her spouse became overwhelmed, she was assessed for MAiD and lethally injected shortly after.

   • Sathya Dhara Khovac (Winnipeg): A 44-year-old woman who repeatedly begged for home care resources but was refused. In her obituary, she wrote she “could have had more time” if she’d been given help. Instead, she was euthanized in 2022.

   • Sean Tagert (B.C.): A 41-year-old father who battled the system for years to receive home care that would allow him to remain close to his son. Unable to secure the support he needed, he felt he had “no other choice” but euthanasia in 2019.

   • Canadian veterans: A recent testimony revealed a surging number of veterans are being offered MAiD instead of the mental health support they requested.

These aren’t isolated incidents, however.

They’re a systemic feature of a government-run system using euthanasia as a cost-saving pressure valve for an overstretched and underfunded healthcare bureaucracy.

A Healthcare System Pushing Vulnerable Toward Death

Even as Gratton’s family praised the individual doctors and nurses, who they said are overworked and stretched thin, they warned that the system itself is failing.

“Why are they still taking in patients if we have an overcrowding issue and they have no place to put these people?” Lynn asked.

The answer is becoming clearer:

The system has an escape hatch after legalizing euthanasia.

Rather than investing in long-term care, home care, mental health support, or palliative medicine, Canada’s government has built the world’s most aggressive assisted suicide regime.

And it is increasingly used on the elderly, the disabled, the poor, and those simply unable to access basic support.

With the government pushing to expand MAiD to include mental illness, critics warn the system will shift from crisis to catastrophe.

Euthanasia Has Become the Default Option, Not the Last Resort

In a civilized society, assisted suicide would be a tragic last resort.

In Canada, it is becoming a routine substitute for care.

The chilling reality is that the Liberal Canadian government now sees “assisted suicide” as:

• A cost-saving mechanism.
• A release valve for a failing system.
• A quiet way to disappear the vulnerable.

This is not compassion.

It’s coercion through neglect.

And unless Canadians demand change, the stories will only grow more frequent and more horrifying.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/canadians-forced-choosing-euthanasia-denied-treatments/

And,

READ MORE – Canada Pushes to Begin Euthanizing Children

In a stunning rebuke of Britain’s escalating war on free speech, President Donald Trump’s White House is actively considering offering political asylum to UK citizens prosecuted under socialist Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s growing regime of “thought crime” laws.

It comes as the far-left government continued to persecute Britons for wrongthink, including silent prayer, anti-censorship activism, and online dissent.

The move, which insiders describe as serious and already under internal review, would extend America’s protection to British citizens targeted for what the White House views as peaceful expression criminalized by the radical Labour Party government.

According to senior administration sources, the discussions were heavily influenced by Elon Musk.

Musk has repeatedly highlighted the UK’s prosecution of citizens over “thought crimes.”

The tech mogul has been warning that Western free expression is collapsing in real time.

Officials are now evaluating specific cases, including Livia Tossici-Bolt.

Tossici-Bolt was prosecuted in March 2023 simply for holding a sign reading “Here to talk if you want” near a Bournemouth abortion clinic.

Similarly, Adam Smith-Connor, convicted over a silent vigil outside Poole Magistrates Court.

As Slay News recently reported, a pastor also received a warning from police that the bible verse on his camper may lead to his arrest for “hate speech.”

These cases became international flashpoints, illustrating Britain’s descent into speech policing.

A source close to the planning confirmed that the administration is “beginning to consider” extending protection beyond pro-life activists to a wider category of British dissidents, including gender-critical speakers, immigration critics, and even pro-abortion advocates who fall afoul of Starmer’s sweeping “thought crime” directives.

The White House is considering offering political asylum to British “thought criminals”, The Telegraph understands.

Read more here ⬇️

https://t.co/GF3IarnyIX pic.twitter.com/bvfc8UcDwv

— The Telegraph (@Telegraph) November 16, 2025 Click to accept marketing cookies and enable this content

This new asylum strategy mirrors President Trump’s October promise to welcome Europeans persecuted for opposing mass migration, prioritizing those “targeted for peaceful expression of views online.”

The administration has already demonstrated willingness to act.

Earlier this year, Trump granted refugee status to white South Africans, citing racial discrimination, even while pausing most other asylum admissions following his January inauguration.

Trump’s criticism of Europe’s political direction has been blunt and consistent.

At the United Nations, he warned EU leaders:

“You’re destroying your countries.

“They’re being destroyed.

“Europe is in serious trouble.

“They’ve been invaded by a force of illegal aliens like nobody’s ever seen before.

“Illegal aliens are pouring into Europe.”

He added that nations across the continent were “going to hell” because of unchecked mass migration.

WATCH: Click on the link to view the video below… Trump Drops the Hammer on UN Members: ‘Your Countries Are Going to Hell’

Over the weekend, in an interview with GB News, Trump linked Britain’s free speech crisis directly to its immigration meltdown, saying:

“If you don’t get [illegals] out, you’re not going to have a country left…

“You have areas in London where the police don’t even want to go anywhere near those areas.

“You have Sharia Law where they don’t even want to obey the laws of your country.”

The administration is simultaneously preparing to revoke the U.S. visa of Imran Ahmed — head of an NGO tied to Starmer’s chief of staff — after the group lobbied aggressively for online censorship rules. A source revealed that Starmer’s push for a U.S.-UK trade deal nearly collapsed over Tossici-Bolt’s prosecution, with one official warning: “no free trade without free speech.”

This broader asylum initiative follows Trump’s May 2025 deployment of a Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour (DRL) delegation to London, led by senior adviser Samuel Samson, to meet with arrested pro-life activists and reaffirm “the importance of freedom of expression in the UK and across Europe.”

The DRL team also examined cases like Lucy Connolly, who was jailed for a social media post calling for asylum hotels to be set on fire after the Southport murders — a conviction critics say exemplifies Britain’s shift toward policing thoughts rather than actions.

Trump also blasted British media outlet the BBC.

The president argued that he has “an obligation” to sue the outlet for pushing “fake news.”

Trump noted that if the BBC is publishing such blatant propaganda about him, who else are they smearing with false claims?

“Have they done it to your prime minister?” Trump asked.

“Have they done it to [Reform leader] Nigel [Farage]?”

WATCH: Click on the link to view the video below… Trump: ‘I Have an Obligation’ to Fight Back Against Media Propaganda

As Starmer’s Labour government accelerates its crackdown on dissent, from bans on silent prayer near clinics to sweeping online speech restrictions, Trump’s White House is signaling that the United States is prepared to become a refuge for those targeted under Britain’s widening censorship regime.

For many in the UK now facing prosecution for mere expression, America may soon be the only Western nation willing to defend their fundamental liberties.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/trump-considers-asylum-uk-citizens-persecuted-wrongthink/

And,

READ MORE – Trump to Deport UK Government-Linked Anti-Conservative Censorship Lobbyist

Belgium’s government has launched an unprecedented outreach campaign to its youth, sending letters to every 17-year-old in the country encouraging them to consider a year of voluntary military service once they turn 18.

The initiative was announced by Defense Minister Theo Francken.

Francken introduced the proposal earlier this year as a response to long-standing personnel shortages and what he calls the need to bolster Belgium’s reserve forces.

Parliament approved the plan last month, authorizing the Ministry of Defense to send personalized letters directly to minors.

In a post on X, along with photos of boxes filled with envelopes, Francken wrote:

“149,000 letters were sent out yesterday.

“All 17-year-olds in the country are being encouraged to learn about Defense in general and the voluntary military service year in particular. Let’s go!”

149.000 brieven gingen gisteren op de post. Alle 17-jarigen van het land worden warm gemaakt voor Defensie in het algemeen en voor het vrijwillige militaire dienstjaar in het bijzonder.

Let’s go! @BelgiumDefence  pic.twitter.com/UaStbvIHuC

— Theo Francken (@FranckenTheo) November 8, 2025 Click to accept marketing cookies and enable this content

While the program is technically optional, critics say the scale and tone of the initiative suggest Belgium may be preparing the public for a future return to mandatory service.

Francken denied the accusation, insisting that “the army can’t handle that logistically.”

Belgium, like many Western nations, is dramatically expanding its uniformed ranks.

According to the Brussels Times, the country aims to reach 34,500 active personnel, 12,800 reservists, and 8,500 civilian staff over the next decade.

Recruitment targets for 2026 include more than 4,800 new roles across the military, reserves, and support services.

Volunteer applicants aged 18–25 will initially be offered 500 reservist positions at a net monthly salary of €2,000.

A Wider European Trend

Belgium’s move mirrors similar actions across the European Union (EU).

Across the EU, governments are pushing young people toward military roles amid heightened geopolitical tensions.

The Netherlands now sends teenagers questionnaires to gauge interest in defense careers and already operates a voluntary service year.

Sweden brought back conscription in 2017.

Germany is debating a lottery-based requirement for 18-year-old males if voluntary recruitment falls short.

These efforts align with Brussels’ broader push for EU-wide defense expansion, frequently framed as a deterrent against potential Russian aggression.

Moscow rejects that narrative entirely, arguing that Western leaders are stoking fear to distract from internal political problems.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said the EU’s militarization is spiraling due to what he called “Russophobic frenzy,” warning the bloc is drifting toward a “Fourth Reich.”

As Europe accelerates its recruitment and defense integration policies, Belgium’s mass mailing campaign marks one of the clearest signs yet that the continent is preparing the next generation for a dramatically more militarized future.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/belgian-government-teenagers-voluntary-military-sevice/

And,

READ MORE – Pete Hegseth Vows to Restore U.S Military’s Warrior Mentality

A controversial art exhibit in Switzerland is drawing outrage for displaying a hyper-realistic sculpture of President Donald Trump strapped to a cross-shaped execution gurney and dressed in an orange prison jumpsuit.

The half-size sculpture is titled “Saint or Sinner?”

It was created by British artist Mason Storm and depicts Trump with his eyes closed and head tilted to the side, as if he has just been executed by lethal injection.

The piece, which was previously displayed in Vienna, Austria, went on display last Saturday at the Gleis 4 gallery in Basel.

It will remain on display through mid-November, according to Agence France-Presse.

Storm, a London-based artist who conceals his identity behind custom masks, described the work as intentionally ambiguous.

“Half life size Donny Trump, probably the most decisive politicians of the modern era, or past for that matter,” Storm wrote on Instagram.

“Despised by some beloved by others, so is he a saint on a cross or a sinner on the lethal injection gurney? You decide.”

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Mason Storm (@masonstormgenius) Click to accept marketing cookies and enable this content

He added in a statement:

“In a world increasingly driven by polarized narratives, this work offers a moment of reflection, urging us to take responsibility — and to realize that every decision tells a story.”

Despite claiming neutrality, Storm’s online comments make clear his personal animus toward the president.

“He’s not the messiah, he’s a very naughty boy!” he wrote in a separate post.

Gallery Reverses Course After Safety Fears

The sculpture was initially set to appear at Basel’s central train station, but Gleis 4 canceled the pop-up event, citing “expected large crowds and feared disturbances.”

Instead, the gallery quietly installed the piece last week in a display window along Kunstmeile, an indoor pedestrian walkway in downtown Basel.

According to France24, the sculpture has already been purchased by “an internationally renowned figure living in Europe,” whose identity remains confidential.

Bishop Hermann Glettler of the Diocese of Innsbruck condemned the work as “simply deviant.”

Part of a Broader Pattern of Anti-Trump Imagery

The exhibit follows years of violent and demeaning portrayals of President Trump in popular culture.

A 2017 New York theater production staged a mock assassination of Trump in a modern retelling of Julius Caesar.

In a career-destroying moment, comedian Kathy Griffin also infamously posed for a photo holding a prop of Trump’s decapitated head.

This latest display comes as surveys show a disturbing normalization of political violence on the Left.

A poll conducted in April by the Network Contagion Research Institute and Rutgers University’s Social Perception Lab found that 55% of respondents identifying as left-of-center said assassinating Trump would be at least “somewhat justified.”

When asked about the September 2024 assassination attempt at Trump’s Florida golf course, 28% of Democrats said it “would have been better” if the president had been killed.

The recurring pattern of violent imagery and rhetoric toward the president, now extending into European “art” galleries, underscores how anti-Trump sentiment has moved beyond political opposition and into open celebration of harm.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/european-art-exhibition-features-sculpture-trump-crucifix/

And,

READ MORE – Europe Criminalizes Large Cash Payments Ahead of ‘Digital Euro’ Launch

Blogger Comment: Now Canada has gone rogue again in not informing their people that there meat food can be either normal livestock sourced or cloned…as they are not telling the Canadian people on the labels, so they do not know what they are consuming…this is not just unethical in not informing the public-at-large, but health questions, as there has been NO LONG TERM research into the side effects of this transition in food source, just like the mRNA injections that they told us were ‘safe and effective’, but where global research states very differently indeed and where even the inventors of mRNA technology say that it is not safe or effective based upon worldwide research…as previously all vaccines were tested on average for over 10-years before they were released onto the public, after rigorous testing and over a decade in feedback by the medical profession…this is therefore insane, but criminal to say the very least…and not scientific progress, but regressive science with no long-term basis behind it…

“Cloned meat” is about to enter Canadian grocery stores without safety testing, disclosure, or labeling of any kind, after Health Canada quietly dismantled its 22-year policy that protected the public food supply from such products.

The Canadian government’s previous policy treated cloned products as novel foods requiring pre-market review.

The decision removes all oversight and allows cloned “meat” and “milk” products, and the offspring of cloned animals, to be sold to millions of Canadians with no indication whatsoever of their lineage.

The move immediately set off alarm bells in the United States.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved cloned meat back in 2008 and allowed it to flood the food supply without labels.

Many Americans are only now discovering that they have likely been eating cloned products for years.

Online, the reaction has been explosive, with users calling the situation unacceptable and demanding transparency.

Some say they likely purchased cloned products unknowingly, blasting regulators for failing consumers and hiding the true origins of what is being sold on store shelves.

Opposition to cloned meat spans ethical, religious, and safety concerns.

Critics warn of serious animal-welfare issues, pointing to high rates of clone miscarriages, deformities, suffering, and death.

Others warn about potential contamination from antibiotics or hormones used on sick clones, animals that would never survive long enough to enter the food chain directly, but whose offspring do.

Ethical concerns also run deep, with many uncomfortable about the technology itself or warning that its normalization could open the door to attempts at human cloning.

Cloned meat is banned entirely in Europe.

In Europe, cloning farm animals and selling products from their offspring is illegal.

However, Canada is moving in the opposite direction.

Beginning next year, cloned animals and their descendants will no longer be considered novel foods, eliminating all safety assessments and all labeling requirements.

The process begins by creating a genetically identical copy of a “desirable” animal.

That clone is then bred normally, and its offspring enter the food chain, indistinguishable from traditional meat, except consumers are never told what they’re buying.

The decision has sparked strong backlash from producers like duBreton, a major Certified Humane and organic pork supplier.

The company issued a warning to Canadians:

“People have the right to choose for themselves.

“Quietly changing the definition of a novel food takes that choice away.”

Health Canada’s justification mirrors the FDA’s longstanding position that regulators claim cloned meat and milk are “not materially different” from traditional products and therefore do not require labels.

In the U.S., regulators expect that it is mostly the offspring of clones, not the clones themselves, that end up in the food supply.

But without mandatory labeling, American consumers have no reliable way to know whether their purchases come from cloned lineage.

Consumer advocates argue that the lack of transparency is unacceptable and that regulators are pushing cloned meat into stores without giving the public any meaningful way to make informed choices.

The Center for Food Safety blasted the FDA’s stance, saying:

“FDA’s decision flies in the face of massive public opposition to animal cloning, widespread scientific concerns about the risks of eating food from clones, and troubling animal cruelty and ethical concerns associated with the cloning process.

“The FDA admitted in its own risk assessment that a vast quantity of animal clones are unhealthy and would not be suitable for the food supply.”

Meanwhile, cloning technology continues to advance rapidly.

Scientists have successfully cloned rhesus monkeys, including a healthy clone named Retro born in 2020, hailed by researchers as a breakthrough that “turned impossible to possible.”

Last year, China successfully cloned Tibetan goats using the same technique used to clone Dolly the Sheep in 1996.

Now, Canada is preparing to introduce cloned meat into grocery stores without telling the public.

For millions of consumers on both sides of the border, cloned meat is here, and regulators don’t plan to warn you.

Click on the link below to view the source…

‘Cloned Meat’ to Flood Canadian Food Supply Without Safety Reviews or Labeling

And,

READ MORE – Real Meat Much Healthier Than Fake Plant-Based ‘Alternatives,’ Study Finds

Blogger Comment: Canada and its political leaders (all World Economic Forum (The WEF) members and some very senior like Carney) are now wanting to euthanize children and even as young as babies, just like the WEF has long stated in some of their addresses in Davos (not on humanitarian grounds either and just because they had something wrong with them when they were born or have been affected by something after birth)…but where, the Canadian children DO NOT have to be “terminally ill” to be eligible for termination, as that is the only word to describe this new political expansion of their euthanasis programme in what they are literally doing now…many say pure evil and asking the pointed question, what has happened in a mere 9-years since Canada introduced euthanasia for the terminal ill ONLY, as it certainly not that now and encompasses a plethora of other reasons to euthanize people that were never envisioned in 2016, which are constantly growing by political will to euthanize even more Canadian people…and not at all linked to being “terminally ill“…therefore the WEF and their loyal servants have a great deal to answer for to humanity here as usual and that is perfectly clear now…former PM Trudeau for bringing the Act into force, with very little checks and balances, to go rogue,  and PM Carney in particular for allowing what appears to be a crime against humanity now !…where even children’s lives at stake now…

Canada is once again facing outrage over its rapidly expanding euthanasia regime, as powerful advocacy groups are now pressuring the federal government to open the door to euthanizing children.

The move comes even as Canada already runs one of the most permissive “assisted suicide” systems on the planet.

The Canadian government no longer requires a terminal illness to euthanize citizens, and that has increasingly targeted society’s most vulnerable.

The poor, the disabled, the chronically ill, people suffering from depression and autism, and even veterans seeking help for PTSD, are all being euthanized by the Liberal government.

Now, activists want to take it even further.

Under current law, adults can apply for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) even if they are not dying, so long as they have a chronic illness, a disability, or they are experiencing “suffering.”

But organizations such as Dying with Dignity Canada are lobbying for a seismic expansion by opening MAiD to children who are determined to be so-called “mature minors.”

Advocates argue that children who can “demonstrate full decision-making capacity” should be eligible for euthanasia.

Their proposal includes parental consent for those 15 and younger, but astonishingly, they claim the government should be allowed to euthanize 16- and 17-year-olds without their parents’ involvement.

Canada’s own lawmakers appear sympathetic.

In February 2023, the Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying made a stunning declaration:

“Eligibility for MAiD should not be denied on the basis of age alone.”

That single line set off alarm bells across the world.

A Disturbing Pattern

This latest push follows the same trend exposed in our earlier reports: every “safeguard” in Canada’s euthanasia law is temporary, and every temporary limit becomes the next political battleground.

Over the past several years:

• Disabled Canadians who couldn’t afford housing were offered MAID instead of support.
• Veterans requesting help for PTSD were encouraged to consider euthanasia by government caseworkers.
• People with treatable illnesses reported being steered toward assisted suicide as a cheaper alternative to care.

And in earlier expansions, authorities insisted these cases were “rare” or “isolated.”

Yet each scandal was followed by new pressure campaigns to widen access even further.

This is why critics warn that allowing child euthanasia is not a hypothetical fear, as it becomes the next logical step in a program that has already moved far beyond its original scope.

The Next Battleground: Mental Illness

The ruling Liberal Party government has not yet officially embraced the “mature minors” expansion.

However, the idea is already expected to resurface in 2027, when MAiD crosses its next chilling milestone.

In 2027, the government begins rolling out an expansion to MAiD laws to begin euthanizing people whose only medical condition is a mental illness.

That expansion has already been delayed multiple times due to public backlash, but activists remain determined to implement it.

Once mental-illness-only MAiD is approved, opponents warn that pressure for teens and young adults suffering from depression, anxiety, trauma, or gender dysphoria could become impossible to contain.

‘Mission Creep’ Has Become the Norm

International human-rights organizations have repeatedly flagged Canada’s euthanasia program as one of the most dangerous in the world, pointing out that “safeguards” disappear with each legislative review.

Proving their point, Canada’s own committees have already adopted language implying that age is not a legitimate barrier, opening the door to the next phase of normalizing state-sanctioned death for minors.

For critics, this is a line that no civilized nation should cross.

As the debate intensifies, it has become clear that every time Canadians are told MAiD expansion will “stop here,” the government’s own bureaucracies quietly prepare for the next round.

The 2027 expansion will be a major turning point that will reveal whether the world’s most aggressive euthanasia system is poised to target children next.

READ MORE – Canadian Man Devastated After Government Euthanizes Both Grandmothers

Blogger Comment: It is the Swiss Davos Globalists who are behind this to change humanity forever for their own purpose, as the control most of the Tech Giants in Silicone Valley and worldwide through BlackRock, Vanguard et al and where their CEO’s are just their corporate pawns and institutional puppets, just like all western leaders now except those that still control their own countries that are, the USA, Hungary, Slovakia and Italy, as all the rest have fallen to the Globalist’s financial and economic power together with blackmail, exposure and criminal sedition behind closed doors…and you should do your own research if you do not know this already…

Silicon Valley power players are bankrolling a new frontier that many experts say crosses every ethical line imaginable: genetically engineered human embryos.

Backed by some of the biggest names in tech, newly funded startups are pushing ahead with research that could one day produce lab-designed children, all while operating in legal gray zones and openly eyeing foreign jurisdictions to dodge U.S. restrictions.

The Wall Street Journal first exposed the rapidly developing effort, revealing that startups like Preventive, founded earlier this year by CRISPR scientist Lucas Harrington, are securing millions to explore embryo editing.

Their pitch is eliminating hereditary diseases.

However, the push is triggering major concerns that it is opening the door to designer babies and a future dictated by tech-driven eugenics.

Millions Flow from Silicon Valley Elites

Preventive has already raised $30 million from elite investors, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong.

The San Francisco–based company calls itself a public-benefit corporation devoted to the “responsible advancement of genome editing technologies applied before birth to benefit humanity.”

Harrington, who trained under Nobel-winning CRISPR pioneer Jennifer Doudna, insists the firm’s mission is humanitarian, targeting devastating genetic illnesses like sickle cell disease and cystic fibrosis.

“We are not trying to rush things,” he told the Journal.

“We are committed to transparency in our research and will publish our findings, whether positive or negative.”

But behind the scenes, sources told the paper that the company has already examined other countries, including the United Arab Emirates, as potential locations where human embryo editing could be performed.

Harrington claimed this was due to U.S. regulatory barriers rather than an attempt to escape oversight.

Tech Billionaires Cheer On Embryo Engineering

Sam Altman’s husband, Oliver Mulherin, reportedly guided their investment.

Mulherin describes the effort as a way to “help families avoid genetic illness.”

Brian Armstrong was even more explicit, declaring on X that he was “excited” to support Preventive.

Armstrong argues that it is “far easier to correct a genetic defect in an embryo than to treat disease later in life.”

The influx of billionaire funding mirrors a larger tech-driven push into reproductive genetics.

Startups such as Manhattan Genomics and Bootstrap Bio are already exploring research paths that would likely require trials outside the United States.

However, American regulators and bioethicists are increasingly sounding the alarm.

Illegal in the U.S.

Genetically engineering embryos intended for pregnancy remains illegal under U.S. federal law.

The FDA is barred from even reviewing applications for such trials.

Most nations worldwide have similar bans in place, specifically to prevent a repeat of the catastrophic He Jiankui incident in China, where CRISPR-edited twins were born in 2018.

The long-term effects on those children are still unknown.

Despite that history, the new Silicon Valley–funded wave is pushing boundaries again.

Experts Warn of Eugenics

Fyodor Urnov, a leading scientist at UC Berkeley’s Innovative Genomics Institute, issued one of the starkest warnings in the Journal:

“They are either lying, delusional, or both.

“These people, armed with very poorly deployed sacks of cash are working on ‘baby improvement’.”

Urnov and other critics argue that commercial embryo editing will inevitably move beyond medical necessity into enhancing traits like intelligence or physical ability.

It’s the exact territory modern society vowed never to revisit.

An Unfolding Nightmare

Harrington and his advisers maintain that the technology will be used only for severe hereditary conditions and not for cosmetic or enhancement purposes.

They argue that for families facing unavoidable genetic diseases, embryo editing represents hope.

But the combination of billionaire money, fledgling regulation, and an industry openly considering offshore trials has raised the alarms of those who warn that Silicon Valley is now attempting to rewrite human biology itself.

Yet, there is no democratic mandate and enormous potential for abuse.

If this trajectory continues, the coming decade may determine whether gene-edited children become a fringe experiment… or an elite-driven reality.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/silicon-valley-elites-pump-cash-banned-genetically-modified-babies-research/

And,

READ MORE – Multiple Experts Predict AI Technology Will Destroy Humanity

Blogger Comment: This is the real insane face of the Davos Globalists who control now all western nation except the USA, Hungary, Slovakia and Italy and what they do for ‘sport’ where you had better get used to it, as it is coming to you by 2039 when they take over the western world by 2030..how do we know, they have stated so since 1971 when the World Economic Forum (WEF) was created and when the most disastrous economic decision was ever made for the American people and humanity when the US Dollar came off the Gold Standard (all planned of course by the Globalist elites in Switzerland) and ever since the Globalists elites (consisting of over 1,235 US$ billionaires including BlackRock, Vanguard et al) have made sure that the USA and the West is destroyed every year since, as their Presidents since 1971 and up to 2016 were all the Globalists’ political puppets, just taking orders from these insane people…come 2030 you will know and see the fullness of these absolutely mad people..for sure…

Chilling details are emerging of a so-called “human safari” in which powerful Western elites paid large sums of money to hunt and kill civilians, including children, during “sniper tourist” trips in Europe.

Italian authorities have launched a shocking investigation into allegations that wealthy individuals from Western nations paid as much as $90,000 for “sniper safaris” during the Bosnian War.

The trips allegedly allowed elite thrill-seekers to shoot unarmed civilians in Sarajevo for sport.

The complaint, filed by journalist Ezio Gavazzeni, describes an almost unimaginable level of barbarism.

Gavazzeni uncovered evidence that foreign elites were allegedly coordinating with Bosnian Serb forces to treat a besieged war zone as a private hunting ground.

During the so-called “sniper tourist” trips, innocent men, women, and even children became human targets.

The civilians were hunted down, shot, and killed for the entertainment of rich and powerful elites.

Gavazzeni began investigating after watching a 2022 documentary.

He said the participants had no ideological motive whatsoever.

“There were Germans, French, English … people from all Western countries who paid large sums of money to be taken there to shoot civilians,” he stated.

He said these individuals were driven purely by depraved pleasure.

“There were no political or religious motivations,” Gavazzeni explains.

“They were rich people who went there for fun and personal satisfaction.

“We are talking about people who love guns who perhaps go to shooting ranges or on safari in Africa.”

According to the allegations, participants could even pay an additional fee to target children.

The organizers are turning the real-life nightmare of the Sarajevo siege into a paid “experience” for the wealthy.

WATCH: Click on the link to view the video below… Wealthy Elite ‘Sniper Tourists’ Paid to Shoot & Kill Civilians During ‘Human Safari’

A spokesperson for the Bosnian Consulate in Milan confirmed they are cooperating with investigators.

In a statement, officials stressed the gravity of the case:

“We are impatient to discover the truth about such a cruel matter in order to close a chapter of history.

“I am in possession of certain information I will be sharing with the investigators.”

The claims echo the darkest depictions of elite depravity.

Observers have compared the allegations to HBO’s Westworld, where ultra-wealthy tourists engage in violence, rape, and murder inside a simulated Old West theme park.

In the show, like the movie it was based on, guests justify their brutality because the victims aren’t human.

However, the story exposes how such moral detachment breeds monstrous behavior.

Here, the parallel is even more horrifying as the alleged “sniper tourists” were not shooting robots or simulations.

They were hunting real human beings.

Those who participated were murdering civilians trapped in one of the 20th century’s most brutal sieges.

Yet, they were treating the killings as recreation.

The accusations reinforce long-standing fears about what happens when unchecked privilege meets total moral decay.

From Jeffrey Epstein’s operation, to whispered rumors of underground “elite” rituals, to scandals involving trafficked victims and unpunished crimes, these revelations fit a disturbing pattern:

When the powerful believe they are untouchable, humanity becomes expendable.

Italian prosecutors are now working to verify the allegations.

If confirmed, this would expose yet another hidden chapter of elite brutality, where war became a playground, human life became currency, and the boundaries of cruelty were pushed far beyond what the public ever imagined.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/wealthy-elite-sniper-tourists-paid-shoot-kill-civilians-human-safari/

And,

READ MORE – Epstein Emails: Hillary Clinton Had Secret Affair with Vince Foster Shortly Before He ‘Committed Suicide’

President Donald Trump’s administration has revealed sweeping fraud inside the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), top officials have announced.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins revealed that at least 186,000 deceased individuals were receiving benefits.

However, the huge number is expected to grow further once data from Democrat-run states is finally disclosed.

Rollins detailed the findings while addressing concerns surrounding SNAP, describing the scale of fraud as staggering.

She explained that on her first day in office, she sent a letter to all 50 states requesting full recipient data.

The requested data includes names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and addresses.

Rollins explained that the federal government had never requested that information before.

In a post on X, Rollins said that she issued the request “so we could make sure illegal immigrants aren’t getting benefits meant for American families,” adding:

“The Democrat Party has turned its back on working Americans and built its entire strategy around protecting illegal aliens.

“They know if the handouts stop, those illegals will go back home, and Democrats will lose 20+ seats after the next census.”

Rollins said that 29 states, mostly red states, complied and submitted their data in February, March, and April.

“29 states — mostly the red states — responded with their data sets, February, March, April; so the numbers that you’re talking through, those are numbers that we have been collecting and analyzing since early summer/late spring,” she said.

What her team discovered was far more alarming than initial reports suggested.

Rollins revealed that early media reports on 5,000 dead people receiving benefits represented only a fraction of the truth.

“The fact that this spotlight shined on SNAP has allowed us to talk about it.

“But here’s the most unbelievable news I have [learned] really just over the last few days:

“That 5,000 dead people, that was just one month; the number is closer to 186,000 deceased men and women and children in this country are receiving a check.

“That is what we are really going to start clamping down on. Half a million are getting two [checks].”

She added that these findings come only from the 29 states that responded.

“But here’s the really stunning thing,” she continued.

“This is just data from those 29, mostly red, states. Can you imagine when we get our hands on the blue state data, what we’re gonna find?

“It’s gonna give us a platform and a trajectory to fundamentally rebuild this program, have everyone reapply for their benefit, make sure that everyone that’s taking a taxpayer benefit through SNAP or food stamps, that they literally are vulnerable and they can’t survive without it.”

WATCH:

BREAKING: Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins to OVERHAUL entire SNAP program after major fraud exposed

– 186,000 dead people receiving benefits– 500,000 recipients are getting double benefits– every recipient will need to reapply to verify “they can’t survive without it”… pic.twitter.com/J2UE23KMTa

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) November 14, 2025Click to accept marketing cookies and enable this content

The Trump administration is now preparing aggressive reforms to eliminate fraud, remove ineligible recipients, and restore SNAP as a program intended for vulnerable Americans, not foreign nationals, duplicate filings, or the deceased.

More announcements are expected as the Department of Agriculture continues analyzing the data and presses remaining states to comply with federal requests.

Folow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/trump-admin-uncovers-huge-number-dead-people-receiving-snap-benefits/

And,

READ MORE – SNAP Beneficiaries Threaten to Loot Stores Over Democrat Shutdown: ‘It Is the Taxpayer’s Job to Pay for My Kids to Eat’

FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi have released explosive new files to Congress showing how Bill and Hillary Clinton’s foundation collected foreign and domestic donations from those seeking influence over the U.S. government.

However, these payments were never investigated fully for influence-peddling schemes.

The files are being called the “Clinton Corruption Files,” and Patel and Bondi plan to make them public in the next week or two once some information related to the whistleblowers is removed.

The evidence will show that there was an effort “to obstruct legitimate inquiries into the Clinton Foundation by blocking real investigation by line-level FBI agents and DOJ field prosecutors and keeping them from following the money,” an official who has seen the files said.

The Clinton Foundation was started after Bill left office in 2000.

However, some of the contributions were received while Hillary served as Secretary of State under Barack Obama.

Cash again started to flow into the organization when Hillary Clinton ran for president in 2016.

Yet, the flood of donations mysteriously stopped when Hillary was defeated by President Donald Trump.

Whistleblowers in 2015 said that some of the documents and evidence were kept from investigators in Little Rock, Arkansas.

The Democrat power couple lived in Little Rock before Bill Clinton became president.

The investigation was soon shut down by order of Obama Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, a Clinton ally.

If the evidence bears out, it appears that former President Joe Biden wasn’t the first powerful executive branch figure to run a pay-to-play scheme out of the White House.

In fact, there were three separate investigations into the Clintons that were all shut down by Yates.

According to Trump officials, the documents show that lower-level FBI agents and prosecutors prevented evidence from getting to decision makers in the multiple investigations of the Clinton Foundation.

It’s not at all surprising that damning evidence about the Clintons was buried so deeply that it never came to light.

Anyone familiar with the speculation surrounding the Clinton Foundation for years will not be surprised by the revelations by Patel and Bondi.

Republicans long thought that the foundation was a corrupt vehicle for influence peddling.

However, they never had any hard evidence until now.

Unfortunately, the statute of limitations on influence peddling is five years.

So, unless there is evidence of a crime without a statute of limitations, the Clintons will once again get off scot-free.

Other than propping up their legacies, the Clintons don’t appear phased by such allegations.

Nevertheless, exposing the scheme would give away the Democrat playbook.

Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/doj-bombshell-clinton-corruption-files-exposing-foundations-foreign-funding/

And,

READ MORE – Ted Cruz Puts Anti-Trump Activist Judges on Notice