-
Trump Issues Warning to UN: ‘Adapt, Shrink, or Die’
Blogger Comment: The United Nations, the WEF Davos Globalist controlled global body that is destroying humanity for the WEF elites and where most people are unaware of this and the sooner the UN is destroyed and not the western world including the United States of America the better it will be for the people and for the West’s survival, as the UN is the greatest front-man for Davos and you should not forget that for one minute…as all the dictats and orders are for the Globalist elites…and where the UN and the WHO are now a sinister organization and evil Globalist captured organization…just like the WEF’s captured western political leaders puppets where 93% are under the control of the Davos elites and Starmer in the UK…period
.
President Donald Trump’s administration has announced a sweeping restructuring of how U.S. taxpayer dollars are used in United Nations humanitarian programs, warning UN agencies they must “adapt, shrink, or die.”
The warning comes as Washington shifts funding toward efficiency, accountability, and core lifesaving missions.
The State Department said the agreement forces the UN system to consolidate operations, slash bureaucratic overhead, and address what officials described as “ideological creep” inside aid agencies, while still preserving America’s commitment to emergency relief.
“Today’s agreement ushers in a new era of UN humanitarian action and U.S. leadership in the UN system,” said Jeremy Lewin, senior official for Foreign Assistance, Humanitarian Affairs, and Religious Freedom.
“It shifts U.S. funding of UN humanitarian work onto clearly defined, accountable, efficient, and hyper-prioritized funding mechanisms to ensure that every taxpayer dollar spent on humanitarian assistance both advances American national interests and achieves the greatest possible lifesaving impact.”
Lewin said the reforms will save lives and money.
“Over President Trump’s second term, this partnership will save tens of millions of lives all around the world, while also delivering billions in efficiency-oriented savings to American taxpayers,” he added.
Centralized Fund Will Replace Hundreds of Fragmented Grants
Under the reforms, U.S. humanitarian contributions will flow into a centralized fund managed by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), rather than being dispersed across hundreds of individual agency projects.
The previous approach, the State Department said, produced overlapping programs and limited the UN’s ability to redirect resources as conditions changed.
Lewin said the restructuring will eliminate duplication and allow aid to be directed toward the most critical missions.
The United States will initially direct $2 billion to 17 priority countries, including Haiti, Syria, Ukraine, and the Congo.
That figure is lower than recent years, when U.S. contributions peaked at roughly $17 billion, but Lewin rejected claims that the move amounts to a deep cut.
“Before you dismiss it by looking at some chart, $2 billion … means millions of people are gonna get life-saving support,” Lewin said, challenging other donors to step up.
UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher said the agency will work to expand its donor base.
“We did get too reliant on the U.S. as easily our largest donor for many, many years. And it’s important we continue that work to broaden the base,” Fletcher said.
“Adapt, Shrink, or Die”
The State Department said UN agencies will be required to reduce overhead, eliminate waste, and curb ideological mission-drift, or risk losing support.
“‘Adapt or die’ is pretty strong,” Fletcher acknowledged, but said agencies are already adjusting to the administration’s emphasis on measurable outcomes.
He said the broader “Humanitarian Reset” has clarified what qualifies as lifesaving aid and stripped away layers of bureaucracy.
“If the choice is adapt or die, I choose adapt,” Fletcher said, adding that he believes the changes will ultimately save more lives.
U.S. Ambassador to the UN Mike Walz said the restructuring aligns humanitarian spending with American priorities.
“This humanitarian reset at the United Nations should deliver more aid with fewer tax dollars, providing more focused, results-driven assistance aligned with U.S foreign policy,” Walz said.
Lewin: Trump Strategy Focuses on Preventing Wars, Not Funding Their Consequences
Lewin said the shift reflects President Trump’s emphasis on diplomacy and conflict prevention rather than endless emergency spending.
“It’s incalculable the human suffering that’s prevented through the hard work of diplomacy that President Trump is doing to prevent armed conflict,” Lewin said.
He contrasted that approach with prior policy.
“Those costs have ballooned in recent years because the Biden administration sat by and let all of these wars and conflicts fester and get worse,” he said.
“And they said, you know, we’ll throw some humanitarian aid at the problem.”
Lewin argued that preventing displacement is more humane and less costly than managing permanent refugee crises.
“No one wants to be living in a [United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees] camp because they’ve been displaced by conflict,” Lewin said.
“So, the best thing that we can do to decrease costs — and President Trump recognized this, and that’s why he’s the president of peace — is by ending armed conflict.”
Over time, the administration expects all U.S. UN humanitarian funding to move through the new OCHA-directed system.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/trump-issues-warning-united-nations-adapt-shrink-die/
And,
-
UK Government Pushes ‘Cradle to Grave’ Digital ID for Babies Plan
Blogger Comment: Davos Prime Minister Starmer (and Emperor of all he purveys and sees going down the drain that he is making sure that it goes the wrong in his United Kingdom for the Globalists) needs a brain check, as his destructive plan for the British people is not going fast enough to control them by 2030 for his WEF masters…but he will continue to destroy Britain as quickly as he can…as he has much to hide…these puppets now control 93% of all western nations in Europe now…and a controlled western infiltration plan by the Davos elites in capturing all or most of them over the last 25 years starting with Labour (really far-Left in disguise destroying the UK, bit-by-bit) Prime Minister Bliar in 1997…
.
The United Kingdom’s digital identity project is accelerating into what critics warn is a full-blown technocratic surveillance regime, as globalist government ministers are now privately discussing assigning digital IDs to newborn babies at birth, locking citizens into a lifetime “cradle to grave” tracking system before they can even walk.
The shocking expansion, revealed by the Daily Mail, exposes what many see as the real agenda behind the ruling socialist Labour Party’s digital identity scheme.
According to the report, the “sinister” plan is being advanced by government ministers during “secret meetings” without public input.
Despite claims by leftist Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government, the plot is not about border enforcement or fraud prevention, but total population monitoring of the general public for life.
Ministers have justified the digital ID rollout as a tool to curb illegal immigration, which has run rampant in recent years due to the government’s own lax border policies.
Instead, the proposal under discussion would embed the system directly into the birth registry, pairing infants’ health records with permanent digital identifiers controlled by the state.
Critics say the plan represents one of the most aggressive assaults on privacy in modern British history.
The newborn-ID concept reportedly emerged during Cabinet Office meetings led by minister Josh Simons, who invoked Estonia’s digital governance model, where babies receive unique identifiers at birth in order to access public services.
Simons also floated the idea that digital IDs could be used to verify minors logging into social media, aligning the plan with global policy pushes such as Australia’s moves to restrict under-16s from platforms like TikTok.
Starmer, who is listed as one of the World Economic Forum’s “people,” first unveiled the digital identity agenda last September.
The globalist PM branded the plot as a workplace verification system to confirm employment eligibility.
The project is expected to cost UK taxpayers £1.8 billion ($2.4B) and roll out between 2028 and 2029.
However, government officials have refused to release full details, fueling fears of deliberate “mission creep.”
Conservative MPs and civil liberties advocates say the mask has now slipped.
Shadow Cabinet Office minister Mike Wood slammed the government’s direction, stating:
“Labour said their plan for mandatory digital ID was about tackling illegal immigration.
“But now we hear they are secretly considering forcing it on newborns.
“What do babies have to do with stopping the [illegal alien] boats?
“This would be a deeply sinister overreach by Labour – and all without any proper national debate.”
Former Conservative Cabinet minister Sir David Davis issued a stark warning, calling the proposal “creeping state surveillance.”
He added:
“The idea that we should allocate children ID at birth is frankly an affront to centuries of British history, and is being put out by stupid ministers who really don’t understand the technology they are playing with.
“They think they are being clever and modern, but a large number of people will be outraged by this.
“It will end up being hated by a lot of people.”
Davis warns that the ministers behind the scheme are “stupid” and dazzled by their own gadgets.
He further blasted Starmer’s approach as a policy sold on a “bogus premise” and expanded without parliamentary scrutiny, labeling it a “constitutional disgrace delivered in a disgraceful manner.”
Liberal Democrat spokesman Lisa Smart echoed those concerns, warning:
“Reports that ministers may be considering dragging newborn babies into their already over-reaching digital ID scheme would be a frightening development.”
Insiders present at the closed-door discussions described stunned reactions when infant enrollment was raised.
One attendee told the Daily Mail:
“The disturbing prospect of digital IDs for newborn babies shows this has nothing to do with right-to-work checks, immigration, or giving people choices.
“It’s a cradle-to-grave digital file being dishonestly forced on every single Briton.
“This is a shocking, underhand way to massively expand a controversial policy our country has always rejected.”
“You could see jaws dropping around the room,” one source reportedly told The Times.
Privacy watchdogs say the implications are vast, especially as Starmer’s broader biometric identity project grows.
The initiative, marketed as a “Brit Card” tied into the UK One Login platform, would centralize access to work, services, healthcare, benefits, banking, and potentially travel.
Opponents warn that such systems can easily evolve into economic coercion tools, where dissenters risk losing access to employment or public services with the click of a bureaucratic switch.
Big Brother Watch has been among the most outspoken critics.
In a post on X, the group highlighted Big Brother Watch director Silkie Carlo’s testimony opposing the system:
“Nobody believes that a mandatory digital ID is about stopping illegal immigration
“So…what is it really about?
“@silkiecarlo speaks truth to power, giving evidence against digital ID.”
The rollout is being framed as a border-security measure, but government migration figures show the vast majority of inflows occur through legal immigration pathways, not asylum evasion.
Critics say that means the real enforcement impact will fall disproportionately on domestic citizens, while doing little to stem the mass illegal immigration numbers.
A government spokesman attempted to downplay the revelations, insisting:
“The only mandatory area of the programme will be for digital right-to-work checks.
“Only people starting a new job will need to use the scheme.”
But a Whitehall source insisted that the newborn ID proposal remains “hypothetical” pending consultation, a qualifier that observers note does nothing to change the fact that the conversation is actively occurring behind closed doors.
For many Britons, the concern is not theoretical.
Digital identity systems across Europe and Canada have already expanded far beyond their initial scope, in several cases becoming gateways tied to medical care, banking, transportation, and state-administered social scoring.
Critics say the Labour supermajority-controlled UK is moving down the same path, only faster, and with less transparency.
This is not a policy course correction; it is a fundamental restructuring of the relationship between citizen and state.
The British people now face a crossroads:
A future of anonymous private life or permanent biometric tagging beginning at birth.
Unfortunately for the taxpaying public, the globalist government isn’t giving them a say in the matter.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/uk-government-pushes-cradle-grave-digital-id-babies-plan/
And,
-
NYT Demands Mentally Ill Woman Euthanized by Canadian Government
Blogger Comment: Canada and PM Carney (a former DAVOS WEF senior executive) are driving further with helping their people find easy evil ways to kill themselves legally and the government are basically insane with their WEF driven depopulation agenda that accelerates ever further than their insane situation now where over 23,000 Canadians died last year through the Government’s euthanasia programme of making vast numbers of Canadians die and where most are NOT terminally ill, that accounts as the 3rd highest killer of the people of Canada…yes mad and also genocidal in dimension now where no other country in the western world or the world has such high numbers of “non-normal deaths” per capita…nowhere…but it is the Davos Globalists depopulation agenda of course that Carney and Canada are taking orders from…insanely true unfortunately…and extremely sinister for humanity’s future if it has any…
.
The New York Times is demanding that the Canadian government advances it’s rapid expansion of “assisted suicide” laws in order to swiftly euthanize a woman suffering from mental health issues.
It comes as Canada’s spiraling assisted-suicide program is once again under international fire after the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities called on the Canadian government to repeal its planned expansion of euthanasia for those suffering solely from mental illness, a policy critics warn will normalize suicide as “healthcare.”
On March 21, the UN committee published a report urging Canada to repeal “Track 2 MAiD” and halt the scheduled 2027 expansion of assisted death eligibility.
Committee Vice-Chair Rosemary Kayess issued a chilling rebuke, calling Canada’s euthanasia regime a “step back into state-sponsored eugenics.”
Yet just days later, the New York Times ran a nearly 4,000-word feature romanticizing the expansion by presenting the case of 48-year-old comedian Claire Brosseau in a piece titled:
“Claire Brosseau Wants to Die. Will Canada Let Her?”
The framing was unmistakable, and the article bluntly argued that a mentally ill woman with suicidal thoughts now wants the government to affirm, approve, and fund her death.
According to the Times, Brosseau, who describes herself as “deeply loved” and having lived a life full of “riches,” suffers from “debilitating mental illness” and has attempted suicide several times.
When Canada first moved to legalize euthanasia for mental illness, she said she “felt a small, tentative, tendril of relief” that she “could die in a way that did not involve pain or violence, or horror for the people who love her.”
If successful, Brosseau will be euthanized with a doctor-administered lethal injection under Canada’s socialized healthcare system.
The Times downplayed the documented agony endured by families who lose loved ones to assisted suicide, instead echoing the rhetoric of Canada’s powerful euthanasia lobby, Dying with Dignity, portraying Brosseau as an “inadvertent player” in the political fight.
Brosseau is physically healthy, and the Times noted she could live “for decades.”
She has undergone dozens of rounds of treatment for multiple psychiatric diagnoses, including manic depression and chronic suicidal ideation.
She originally planned to apply for euthanasia on March 17, 2023, when eligibility for mental-illness MAiD was first scheduled to begin, before the government postponed the expansion amid intense public backlash and a flood of disturbing euthanasia cases.
Reporter Stephanie Nolen followed Brosseau closely for the feature, documenting that her own psychiatrists cannot even agree on whether she should be approved to die.
University of Toronto psychiatrist Dr. Robinson argued her wish for death is a legitimate choice, even while admitting:
“I would love to change her mind.”
He claimed that refusing assisted suicide would amount to discrimination based on her chronic mental-health condition.
Her other psychiatrist, Dr. Mark Fefergrad, strongly disagrees.
He warned that mental illness is inherently unpredictable, meaning so-called “irremediable suffering” cannot be meaningfully determined.
“I believe she can get well,” Fefergrad said.
Using the common Canadian acronym for medical assistance in dying, he added, “I don’t think MAID is the best or only choice for her.”
Fefergrad said he has watched patients improve in ways no clinician could have anticipated.
“People get better in ways we don’t expect — and surprising, unexpected things happen every day,” he said.
“That doesn’t really happen with a big brain cancer.”
He described a former patient who would likely have qualified for assisted suicide, until an unexpected relationship transformed their life.
Fefergrad also warned of future medical breakthroughs:
“What if Ms. Brosseau chose to die, and then a new drug or procedure was developed that might have been transformative for her.
“That weighs on me as a philosophical question.”
The divide has shaken Canada’s psychiatric community, where many experts oppose MAiD for mental illness and warn that legalizing it will push vulnerable patients toward an irreversible decision at their lowest moments.
The Times report recounts Brosseau’s chaotic history in show business, substance abuse, promiscuity, trauma, and severe depressive episodes, alongside deep distrust of the psychiatric system after a violent hospitalization incident she has refused to process.
Now, Brosseau has withdrawn from loved ones and says:
“I’m not a person. I can’t be in the world.”
Her family still loves her through episodes; none of them wants her to die, but as Nolen noted, they have become worn down by the emotional strain and limited support resources.
To Canada’s euthanasia movement, that reality is treated as justification, rather than an indictment of a broken mental-health system.
Dying with Dignity has reportedly taken Brosseau’s case to court.
If the expansion moves forward, critics warn the floodgates will open — giving suicidal Canadians fast-tracked access to a “solution” from which there is no return.
The Times concludes by directing readers to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline — an ironic coda to a story centered on legalizing suicide for the suicidal.
During the debate over Bill C-218, Conservative MP and suicide survivor Andrew Lawton issued a stark warning to Parliament, citing psychiatrist Dr. John Maher:
“Dr. John Maher testified before Parliament that seven percent of those who attempt suicide die by suicide.
“That means that 93 percent of people who, at one or multiple points, want to end their life eventually get over that.
“The success rate of MAiD is 100 percent.
“By design, this is a policy that will give up on people…
“These are real people.
“There are faces to this. If Bill C-218 does not pass, people will die.”
For critics, including the UN’s disability-rights watchdog, Canada’s euthanasia experiment is no longer about compassion or dignity.
It is about a government that has made suicide easier than treatment, and is now preparing to extend that pathway to those who need help the most.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/nyt-calls-mentally-ill-woman-euthanized-canadian-government/
And,
-
Federal Judge Clears Path for AAP to Sue RFK Jr. Over Vaccine Policy Changes
A federal judge today ruled that a coalition of major medical organizations, including the AAP, can proceed with a lawsuit against U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Children’s Health Defense General Counsel Kim Mack Rosenberg said the ruling fails to account for the medical groups’ conflicts of interest.
Blogger Comment: It has to be stated that organisations like AAP are in reality, a trade organizations representing the vaccine industry et al and are not really independent organizations representing the health of children etc, but Big Business and Big Profits where that is where these so-called medical institutions have so badly gone wrong over recent decades and you must always ‘FOLLOW THE MONEY’. to find out and know whether institutions are compromised, as if you do this and undertake your own ‘independent’ research (not just taking the brainwashing word of ‘legacy’ MSM who are totally controlled by the Globalists for their own control interests, not yours, MOST HAVE…the following is an article by The Defender and by the Defender Staff who are always looking out for the health of children and where this article is printed free of charge and not for any monetary remuneration whatsoever that blurs all scientific and media articles these days 100% for the status quo and big money…Remember Covid-19 and how many of our reverred medical instirtutions toild the people about the dire effects of the injections…NONE… and that should make you really think ?
A federal judge today ruled that a coalition of major medical organizations can move forward with a lawsuit challenging vaccine policy changes under U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Judge Brian Murphy of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts rejected the government’s bid to dismiss the case. Murphy ruled that the plaintiffs — which include the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) — have legal standing to sue.
Murphy dismissed the government’s argument that the groups could not show that the new policies would cause them direct harm. The decision opens the door to legal scrutiny of recent actions taken by federal vaccine officials under Kennedy’s leadership.
At the center of the lawsuit is the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a key federal panel that shapes national vaccine recommendations.
The medical organizations want the court to invalidate all ACIP votes cast since June, when Kennedy dismissed 17 sitting members and replaced them with new appointees that he handpicked.
“Plaintiffs allege that these appointments skewed the composition of ACIP in favor of COVID-vaccine and/or mRNA-vaccine deniers in order to comport with Secretary Kennedy’s personal views,” Murphy wrote.
The groups said they believe Kennedy’s overhaul of ACIP violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which requires advisory panels to be “fairly balanced” and operate in an “open, independent” manner.
Murphy ruled that the plaintiffs have plausibly alleged that ACIP’s current makeup violates the requirements of the act, and that their claims are strong enough to survive the government’s motion to dismiss.
Ruling ‘reflects misperceptions about vaccines and children’s health’
Kim Mack Rosenberg, general counsel for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), said the court’s standing analysis rested on flawed assumptions about pediatric care and the role of major medical organizations.
“While I am somewhat surprised that the court found that plaintiffs have standing to sue here,” the ruling “reflects misperceptions about vaccines and children’s health generally,” Mack Rosenberg said.
She said Murphy’s decision fails to account for what she described as the professional and financial interests of the medical groups. The decision “does not reflect the reality that the American Academy of Pediatrics and other organizations are in many respects trade organizations for their professions — primarily protecting the interests of their members, not children.”
She cited language in Murphy’s order about alleged economic harms to pediatricians, calling it revealing.
“It is telling that one of the alleged financial injuries to doctors discussed in the judge’s order is that pediatricians will have to spend more time discussing vaccines with families and thus will not be able to see as many patients each day,” Mack Rosenberg said.
“In other words, doctors may have to have discussions with patients so that families can have informed consent.”
Mack Rosenberg said the court’s reasoning “tacitly admits that, in many pediatric practices, currently those discussions are not taking place in a meaningful way and families are not having their concerns addressed.”
Policy shifts will result in ‘deaths among pregnant women, unborn children, and all children,’ groups allege
Kennedy, who founded CHD before he was appointed secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), has long questioned vaccine safety and criticized what he describes as regulatory capture within federal health agencies.
Since taking office, he has moved to overhaul vaccine decision-making structures, drawing fierce opposition from entrenched medical organizations.
In May 2025, Kennedy directed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to remove its recommendation for COVID-19 shots for all children ages 6 months and older from the agency’s immunization schedules, and instead use “shared clinical decision-making” between parents and providers.
The following month, Kennedy fired the entire ACIP panel and later appointed new members whom critics describe as more skeptical of mass vaccination policies.
In September 2025, the reconstituted committee voted to recommend COVID-19 vaccines for all ages only through “individual decision-making” between patients and healthcare providers, rather than broad population-wide guidance.
The CDC adopted that recommendation in October 2025 for both pediatric and adult patients, effectively ending its previous blanket endorsement of COVID-19 vaccination.
The AAP and several other organizations first sued Kennedy in July 2025, claiming the committee revised the COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for children based on insufficient evidence.
The groups also criticized COVID-19 vaccine changes for pregnant women in their lawsuit, though no changes had been made to the immunization schedule for pregnant women.
The groups’ 42-page complaint describes the changes as “baseless and uninformed” and alleges they place pregnant women and children at “grave and immediate risk.”
The lawsuit also claims the policy shifts will result in “decreased rates of vaccination, increased rates of transmission, long-lasting illness, and ultimately deaths among pregnant women, unborn children, and all children.”
Kennedy has sparked ‘fear’ in families, AAP president said
In November 2025, the groups filed an expanded complaint seeking to disband ACIP entirely and overturn all recommendations made since June, including a December 2025 vote to remove the long-standing guideline that all newborns receive a hepatitis B vaccine.
They are also seeking to rebuild the committee under court supervision — a step with no clear precedent in federal law.
“Pediatricians have seen firsthand the harm created by the disruptive and politicized decisions to overturn decades of evidence-based federal guidance on immunizations,” AAP President Susan J. Kressly said in a November statement. “These changes have caused fear, decreased vaccine confidence, and barriers for families to access vaccines.”
Kressly argued that the consequences are already unfolding, saying children are suffering “avoidable illnesses and hospitalizations” as federal vaccine processes are disrupted.
Plaintiffs’ lawyer has strong ties to Big Pharma
Richard H. Hughes IV, lead counsel for the plaintiffs, told MedPage Today in November 2025 that ACIP “shouldn’t be making policy” in its current form and said the groups want the panel dissolved and rebuilt.
Hughes served as Moderna’s vice president of public policy from 2020 to 2022, during the rollout of the company’s COVID-19 vaccine, Spikevax. Before that, he worked for Merck.
Critics cite those ties as evidence that the lawsuit is aimed at preserving a pharmaceutical-friendly status quo.
Plaintiffs in the case include the AAP, the American College of Physicians, the American Public Health Association, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Massachusetts Public Health Association, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and a pregnant physician identified as “Jane Doe,” who claims she faces “barriers to access to the vaccine.”
Other defendants named in the lawsuit include HHS, the CDC and its acting director Matthew Buzzelli, National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya and U.S. Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary.
Update: This article has been updated to correct U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy’s name.
Click on the Link for the source of the article and reprouced here… https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/federal-judge-clears-path-aap-lawsuit-rfk-jr-vaccine-policy-changes/?utm_source=cc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20260106
-
Ex-CBS Reporter Blows Whistle on Executives Blocking Reporting on Hunter Biden’s Laptop
Blogger Comment: We with our ear to the ground knew that Hunter Biden was a corrupt operative where even former CBS investigative journalists are turning whistleblowers that their Excaacutive covered up for the Bidens, as Hunter had one of the best teachers in the world on the subject of corruptive practices, his father Joe the US President who studies the subject in depth for 53-years (and even before that in politics before becoming a Senator) in the corruptive school of Washington DC…no better CV really and the best university of its kind in the world…
.
Investigative journalist Catherine Herridge has blown the whistle to reveal that CBS executives actively blocked coverage of the Hunter Biden “laptop from hell” scandal, despite the story being ready to publish well before the 2022 midterms.
Herridge, a longtime national security and investigative reporter who previously served as Fox News’s chief intelligence correspondent, joined CBS in 2019 as a senior investigative correspondent.
She was fired in 2024 after probing the Hunter Biden laptop case.
The backstory of the infamous laptop dates back to April 2019.
At the time, Hunter Bide, reportedly intoxicated, arrived at the Delaware computer repair shop run by John Paul Mac Isaac with three damaged MacBook Pro laptops.
One device was destroyed beyond repair and returned to Hunter.
A second laptop required a keyboard that Mac Isaac loaned to him, a keyboard that was never returned.
The third laptop Hunter left behind for repair.
Hunter Biden never came back to retrieve it.
After repeated unsuccessful attempts to contact him, Mac Isaac lawfully took ownership of the abandoned device under his shop’s policy.
In October 2020, The New York Post published emails from the laptop.
The “October surprise” revealed evidence that Hunter Biden conducted foreign business dealings and acted as a financial conduit for Joe Biden as part of an international influence-peddling operation.
Herridge says CBS executives delayed reporting the story, despite the fact that her investigation was complete ahead of the midterms.
“When we did the story, we did it after the [2022] midterms,” Herridge said.
“I argued against that because it was ready before the midterms, and my training is that you should always do the story when it’s ready to go.
“You should not be dictated by the political cycle.”
According to Herridge, CBS finally aired the laptop story two years after the scandal was already public.
However, executives still moved to shut down further coverage, including a separate story involving Joe Biden.
Herridge says executives and producers even overrode CBS CEO George Cheeks when it came to blocking follow-up reporting.
WATCH: click on the link to view the video below… Ex-CBS Reporter Blows Whistle on Executives Blocking Reporting on Hunter Biden’s Laptop
The revelations add to mounting concerns about corporate media gatekeeping.
It also further exposes the role major broadcast networks played in suppressing a story that critics argue carried major political consequences.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/ex-cbs-reporter-blows-whistle-executives-blocked-reporting-hunter-bidens-laptop/
And,
READ MORE – Whistleblower Exposes Massive Somali Fraud Scam in Ohio
-
Putin Accuses Ukraine of Attacking His Home
Blogger Comment: Zelensky is one of the world’s greatest con men and where he is a Globalist stooge ‘First-Class’ put there on the world stage by these Davos people who made Ukraine the first WEF controlled nation implicitly prior to the Covid-19 pandemic where few people seem to know…but where Trump and Putin has something very much in common with each other being bossom cousins in beiung WEF threats to their global plans for humanity, so better together than apart for the future of humankind as they say, but I would say mainly on the latter person if the Globalists ever tell the truth even when they are lying which they do continually…
WEF Views Trump & Putin as Major ‘Threat’ to Globalist Agenda, Davos Insider Reveals – https://world-freedom.co.uk/2025/03/05/wef-views-trump-putin-as-major-threat-to-globalist-agenda-davos-insider-reveals/
.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has accused Ukraine of attacking his official residence in Russia during targeted strikes.
Putin told President Donald Trump during a phone call on Monday that Ukraine allegedly attempted a drone strike on one of his official residences.
The call was the two leaders’ second conversation in as many days.
However, the claim was immediately denied by Ukrainian officials as false and politically motivated.
According to a Kremlin readout, Putin said Moscow would “adjust” its negotiating posture in response to the reported incident.
The statement signals that Russia may be preparing to take a harder line in ongoing discussions over a potential U.S.- and Ukraine-backed peace framework that has been under quiet negotiation for weeks.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov claimed Russian air defenses intercepted 91 long-range drones.
The drone was allegedly headed toward the Dolgiye Borody presidential residence in Russia’s Novgorod region.
The property is located between Moscow and St. Petersburg.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky rejected the allegation outright, however.
Zelensky is accusing Moscow of manufacturing a false flag narrative to justify further strikes.
In a post on X, Zelensky wrote:
“This alleged ‘residence strike’ story is a complete fabrication intended to justify additional attacks against Ukraine, including Kyiv, as well as Russia’s own refusal to take necessary steps to end the war.
“Typical Russian lies.
“Furthermore, the Russians have already targeted Kyiv in the past, including the Cabinet of Ministers building.”
“Ukraine does not take steps that can undermine diplomacy,” he continued.
“To the contrary, Russia always takes such steps.
“This is one of many differences between us.”
Reuters reported that Lavrov warned Moscow would retaliate over what he described as an attempted strike on Putin’s home in northern Russia.
The exchange comes as Trump and Putin are expected to meet in Alaska for direct discussions.
The engagement is seen as central to Washington’s effort to secure negotiated de-escalation after months of stalled diplomatic movement.
The competing claims highlight the deep distrust now shaping the conflict, even as U.S. officials continue to push for a diplomatic resolution.
Instead of signaling openness to compromise, Moscow’s statements suggest it may be preparing to move in the opposite direction by using the alleged incident to justify a tougher negotiating stance and potential escalation.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/putin-accuses-ukraine-attacking-home/
And,
READ MORE – New York Times: Zelensky ‘Systematically Sabotaged’ Ukraine Anti-Corruption Efforts
-
Disney to Pay $10 Million Settlement for Violating Children’s Privacy Laws
Blogger Comment: The Globalist reach knows no bounds and their Democrat darlings and puppets just take orders from their masters in Davos…never take Disney on face value anymore, as they defioniytely are not worth your trust when you realise what they are into…
.
The U.S. Department of Justice has announced that a federal court has approved a stipulated order resolving allegations that Disney Worldwide Services Inc. and Disney Entertainment Operations LLC violated federal children’s online privacy laws.
According to the Justice Department press release, the government alleged that Disney violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and its implementing regulations.
COPPA prohibits operators of websites or online services from knowingly collecting, using, or disclosing personal information from children under 13 without notifying parents and obtaining verifiable parental consent.
The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, alleged that Disney failed to properly designate certain YouTube video content as being directed toward children.
This failure allegedly resulted in advertisements being targeted to child viewers on the platform.
As a result of that failure, Disney and third parties acting on its behalf collected personal information from children without the required parental notice or consent, in what the government said was a direct violation of COPPA.
The Justice Department release also emphasized the scale of Disney’s YouTube presence, noting that its content has accumulated billions of views in the United States.
Officials argued that the scope of that audience heightened the potential privacy impact because the content in question includes videos appealing to children, such as programming featuring Disney characters, animation, and family-oriented entertainment.
The case represents a COPPA enforcement action administered by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
The FTC has pursued similar actions against other companies over improper data collection involving minors on digital platforms.
Under the stipulated order approved by the court, Disney agreed to pay a $10 million civil penalty to the United States.
The agreement resolves the allegations without an admission of liability by the company.
The order also imposes injunctive relief intended to prevent future violations, prohibiting Disney from operating on YouTube in any manner that contravenes COPPA requirements.
In addition, Disney must implement a comprehensive compliance program to ensure continued adherence to the law, including internal policies, employee training, audits, and procedures for properly identifying and labeling child-directed content.
In a statement, Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate of the Justice Department’s Civil Division said:
“The Justice Department is firmly devoted to ensuring parents have a say in how their children’s information is collected and used.
“The Department will take swift action to root out any unlawful infringement on parents’ rights to protect their children’s privacy.”
The settlement resolves the case without trial and does not include findings of fact beyond the allegations contained in the complaint.
Disney did not issue a public statement quoted in the DOJ press release regarding the settlement or the allegations.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/disney-pay-10-million-settlement-violating-childrens-privacy-laws/
And,
READ MORE – USDA Rolls Out Major Shift for U.S Meat and Egg Labels
-
San Francisco Mayor Secretly Signs Bill That Could Give Black Residents $5 Million Each
Blogger Comment: The Democrat’s destruction of the USA continues unabated and where these people will never stop bringing the USA and its people to their knees for their Globalist masters…how long will it take the American people to realise this and where Trump is not the one either, so how long will it also take the American people to realise that as well…as the only way to get back the American dream now is a new political system that supplants the two incumbent political parties with a new grass-roots political system that works for the people and not the Globalists, where that is a continual recipe for destroying western civilization now and what is the Davos Globalist’s agenda, as they have said so many times over the last 55-years…period…
.
San Francisco’s Democrat Mayor Daniel Lurie quietly approved legislation just days before Christmas, creating a city-sanctioned reparations fund that lays the groundwork for potential future payments that could reach $5 million per eligible black resident.
Lurie signed the Reparations Bill two days before the holiday with little public attention, authorizing the establishment of a reparations fund but without allocating any city money to it.
The ordinance formalizes the fund recommended in the African American Reparations Advisory Committee’s 2023 report.
While the measure does not dedicate financial resources, it creates a framework that could later be funded either through public dollars or private donors.
The advisory committee is tasked with developing “recommendations for repairing harm in our black communities,” according to its website.
San Francisco journalist Erica Sandberg was among the first to highlight Lurie’s low-profile approval of the ordinance.
The committee’s 2023 report proposes what it describes as a $5 million lump-sum payment for each eligible African American adult in order to “compensate the affected population for the decades of harm that they have experienced.”
Roughly 50,000 black residents live in the city, though eligibility standards have not been clearly defined.
That proposal has generated significant backlash.
It is one of more than 100 recommendations in the report, which also include debt relief, debt forgiveness, city-funded housing, and a guaranteed $97,000 annual income for black residents.
In 2023, the Hoover Institution warned that implementing the reparations package would amount to an estimated $600,000 tax burden per non-African American household in San Francisco.
Lurie disputed the feasibility of that outcome, telling the Daily Mail that the city’s fiscal reality makes such spending unrealistic.
“For several years, communities across the city have been working with the government to acknowledge the decades of harm done to San Francisco’s black community,” Lurie wrote.
“While that process largely predates my administration, I am signing the legislation to create this fund in recognition of the work of so many San Franciscans and the unanimous support of the Board of Supervisors.”
Lurie noted that San Francisco is facing a $1 billion budget deficit next year.
“That means identifying key priorities for funding so we can continue delivering those services well,” he explained.
“Given these historic fiscal challenges, the city does not have resources to allocate to this fund.”
He added that the administration remains open to outside financing, stating that “if there is private funding that can be legally dedicated to this fund, we stand ready to ensure that funding gets to those who are eligible for it.”
Critics have questioned the timing and quiet approval of the measure, arguing that city officials advanced a highly controversial policy during the holiday period when many residents were unlikely to notice.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/san-francisco-mayor-secretly-signs-bill-black-residents-5-million-each/
And,
READ MORE – LA Mayor Karen Bass Admits Mishandling Devastating Wildfires
-
Report Exposes Billions in Suspicious Rental Aid Under Biden, Including Payments to Dead People
Blogger Comment: This shows just a little bit of the corruption of Biden and the Democrat Party when in office and even at US$50,000, 000,000 (US$50 billion) just a drop in the ocean of the Democrat Administration corruptive ways in the USA… but where I am now seriously questioning the integrity of Trump and his too close a realationship with the Globalists who he said he was not one of them leading up to the presidential elections in 2016 and reinforced that in the 2020 political retrial for President…but Trump has now let down too many people who believed in his words and what Globalists in Davos do continually, as they have no respect whatsoever for humanity and we know that as they have said so many times…and needs reducing to below 500 million humans…
.
An explosive new report from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has exposed a jaw-dropping misuse of taxpayer money that could make even the most hardened fiscal hawk wince.
The HUD report has exposed that billions in federal rental assistance, distributed during the previous administration, ended up in the hands of questionable recipients, including tens of thousands of deceased individuals and potential non-citizens.
This stunning revelation comes straight from HUD’s fiscal year 2025 Agency Financial Report, a document obtained by the New York Post that paints a troubling picture of oversight gone awry.
During fiscal year 2024, HUD shelled out roughly $50 billion in rental assistance to non-federal entities across the country.
Of that staggering sum, a whopping $5.8 billion was flagged as questionable payments, raising serious concerns about accountability.
The funds disproportionately flowed to areas like New York, California, and Washington, D.C., though payments to deceased recipients were identified in every single state.
Through an automated comparison of its records with a U.S. Treasury database, HUD uncovered that 30,054 deceased tenants were either enrolled in or received rental assistance posthumously.
Additionally, thousands of potential non-citizens also benefited from these funds, highlighting a systemic failure to verify eligibility.
One can’t help but wonder how such a colossal lapse happened under the watch of an administration that promised competence and transparency.
HUD’s internal financial review and analytics brought these issues to light, but the report points a finger at the prior administration for pushing rapid fund disbursement with scant oversight.
According to the findings, the Biden team failed to equip HUD with the necessary tools to ensure compliance with rental assistance guidelines, leaving the program vulnerable to abuse.
In a statement to the New York Post, HUD Secretary Scott Turner said:
“A massive abuse of taxpayer dollars not only occurred under President Biden’s watch, but was effectively incentivized by his administration’s failure to implement strong financial controls, resulting in billions worth of potential improper payments.
“HUD will continue investigating the shocking results and will take appropriate action to hold bad actors accountable,” Turner added, signaling a return to the tougher integrity measures seen in earlier years.
Before any drastic steps are taken, HUD must confirm the extent of potential fraud to decide whether to halt funding or pursue criminal referrals.
With new procedures in the works to pause or revoke payments to problematic recipients, there’s hope that taxpayer dollars will finally serve the vulnerable communities they’re meant for, not phantom tenants or ineligible parties.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/hud-report-exposes-billions-suspicious-rental-aid-under-biden-including-payments-dead-people/
Abd,
-
EU Move to End Social Media Anonymity
Blogger Comment: If you wish to look into the face of evil and want to see the face of evil, you only have to just look at the image above as the Globalist’s puppets are all that, with none of them having any good intensions for their fellow men and women that make up humanity…just for themselves alone and if that means controling them to eventually culling them…then so be it in their insane minds…for all the technologies that the people’s taxation has provided (WWW, social media platforms, lethal virus injections, Digital ID, CBDC digital control money, carcinogen food additives, Chemtrails, 5G when they switch it on for its real purpose not pure communications if you step outside the Narrative… et al) for over the last 80-years has had one purpose and intention, to control humanity and to depopulate the world to down to less than 500 million humans, for we know this as the Davos Globalists have said so many times since 1971 out of their own mouths if you care to do your own investigation using alternative news media platforms and not the Globalist’s controlled MSM of the World Economic Forum (the WEF) and their insane agenda for humankind, as their news is totally suppressed news that you never hear about…for if you do not know this, you will be ignorant until the unimaginable does happens by 2030 through their genocidal “Great Reset” agenda for humanity, where we shall all become controlled and totally suppressed servants (who are left) to the Globalists and their wishes, without fail, as they now control all western nations except four, the USA, Hungary, Slovakia and Italy presently…we have to change thia sand break out of this grip, as currently they have all the EU and UK military power behind them through their puppet political leaders that they have literally “enthroned” within our western governments over the past quarter of a century…
.
Ireland’s incoming leadership role in the European Union is being positioned to advance a sweeping new digital control agenda to end online anonymity and roll out verified identity requirements across social media platforms.
Irish Tánaiste Simon Harris confirmed that Ireland’s government intends to use its EU presidency to push for bloc-wide rules forcing users to confirm who they are before posting or interacting online.
However, critics warn that the would fundamentally transform the internet into a monitored identity-tracking grid.
Speaking to the Irish outlet Extra.ie, Harris framed the proposal as an effort to defend what he called “democracy” from online anonymity and what he described as digital manipulation.
The push will advance in parallel with an upcoming policy from Media Minister Patrick O’Donovan aimed at preventing children from accessing social media.
It’s a plan modeled on Australia’s restrictions and expected to roll out during Ireland’s EU term next year.
To implement the measures, governments would need to rewrite sections of the EU’s already-controversial Digital Services Act, shifting it from platform regulation into a gateway for government-linked identity enforcement across the internet.
Privacy and free speech advocates warn that such a framework would open the door to unprecedented monitoring, blacklisting, and political enforcement against citizens who step outside approved narratives.
Harris insisted the initiative is not driven by personal grievance, but by what he described as concern for public life.
He also signaled confidence that Ireland will not be acting alone.
Pointing to growing alignment among Western leaders, Harris said:
“If you look at the comments of Emmanuel Macron…of Keir Starmer…recently, in terms of being open to considering what Australia have done…
“You know this is a global conversation Ireland will and should be a part of.”
Harris is suggesting a coordinated international movement toward identity-verified speech.
Ireland is home to many of the world’s largest technology firms.
Those companies are already under heavy EU scrutiny, and further regulation is expected to face resistance.
The United States has also increasingly pushed back against European online speech controls, even imposing visa bans on EU officials involved in such regulatory regimes.
Despite that mounting tension, Harris signaled the government plans to move forward while avoiding open confrontation, saying:
“This is a conversation we want to have now.
“We don’t want to have it in an adversarial way.
“Companies require certainty too, right?”
Harris also backed O’Donovan’s age-verification initiative, arguing that restrictions already exist in law but are not enforced.
“We have a digital age of consent in Ireland, which is 16, but it’s simply not being enforced,” he said.
From a civil liberties standpoint, critics warn that eliminating online anonymity would mark one of the most consequential shifts in Western digital policy in modern history.
Anonymous speech has long protected whistleblowers, dissidents, political critics, and citizens speaking under social, cultural, or institutional pressure.
Once identity-tracking systems are embedded into digital infrastructure, they are rarely rolled back and can easily be expanded into speech-scoring, access controls, or political surveillance.
Even Harris appeared to signal that tech platforms could be pushed to implement such measures voluntarily, without legislation, stating:
“These companies are technology companies.
“They have the ability to do more, without the need for laws.”
Harris is suggesting that platforms could deploy internal mechanisms to manage bots, algorithms, and age verification.
Opponents argue that such “voluntary compliance” would in practice amount to government-directed censorship conducted through private platforms, beyond the reach of democratic accountability.
As Ireland prepares to assume its EU leadership role, the country now stands at the center of a rapidly escalating global debate over whether the future of the internet will remain free, open, and anonymous or be transformed into a tightly controlled system where every word is tied to a verified identity and monitored from above.
Follow the link for the source… https://slaynews.com/news/eu-leaders-move-end-social-media-anonymity/
And,
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
World Freedom 